dealing with addictions in the workplace march 2012

50
Dealing with addictions in the workplace by Toronto Training and HR March 2012

Upload: timothy-holden

Post on 20-Feb-2017

515 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Dealing with addictions in the workplace

by Toronto Training and HR

March 2012

Page 2: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Contents3-4 Introduction to Toronto Training and HR5-6 Definitions7-9 Disregarding beneficial interventions10-11 Primary motivators12-13 Chronic pain14-15 Risk factors16-17 Treatments at the acute phase18-22 Recent cases23-24 Drugs25-26 The big five27-28 Job performance indicators29-30 The nature of addiction31-32 Continuum of substance use33-34 Causes of addiction35-37 Who is the substance abusing or

dependent employee?38-39 Signs and symptoms40-41 Workplace factors associated with higher levels of addiction42-43 Options available44-46 Legal drugs that can impair reaction time 47-48 Drug testing49-50 Conclusion and questions

Page 3: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 3

Introduction

Page 4: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 4

Introduction to Toronto Training and HR

• Toronto Training and HR is a specialist training and human resources consultancy headed by Timothy Holden

• 10 years in banking• 10 years in training and human resources• Freelance practitioner since 2006• The core services provided by Toronto Training and HR

are:- Training event design- Training event delivery- Reducing costs- Saving time- Improving employee engagement &

morale- Services for job seekers

Page 5: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 5

Definitions

Page 6: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 6

DefinitionsWhat is an addiction?

SubstanceSubstance useSubstance abuseSubstance dependence

Page 7: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 7

Disregarding beneficial interventions

Page 8: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 8

Disregarding beneficial interventions 1 of 2

50% of all medications are not taken as prescribedOnly 20% of people follow their doctor-recommended low-salt diet35% of deaths can be attributed to smoking, poor diet, inactivity and alcohol—behaviours that are well known to be unhealthy

Page 9: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 9

Disregarding beneficial interventions 2 of 2

Only 3% of the population routinely follows four primary healthy behaviours (not smoking, maintaining a healthy weight, being active and eating five servings of fruits and vegetables daily)

Page 10: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 10

Primary motivators

Page 11: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 11

Primary motivatorsPleasureAvoidance of pain

Page 12: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 12

Chronic pain

Page 13: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 13

Chronic painThe prevalence of chronic pain in the general population has been estimated at about 30%One in eight workers loses five hours per week of productive time (excluding missed days) from painReduced productivity while at work, combined with lost workdays, equated to $61.2 billion in estimated lost productivity for the U.S.

Page 14: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 14

Risk factors

Page 15: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 15

Risk factorsTRANSITION FROM ACUTE PAIN TO CHRONIC PAIN TO LONG-TERM DISABILITYFear-avoidanceCatastrophizing (focusing on negative outcomes)Other physical or mental health comorbiditiesLack of social supportJob dissatisfactionSubstance abuse Compensation status

Page 16: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 16

Treatments at the acute phase

Page 17: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 17

Treatments at the acute phase

DECREASE PAIN, INCREASE FUNCTION AND LESSEN DISABILITYMedical managementPatient educationNutrition counsellingPhysiotherapyBiofeedbackOccupational therapyPsychological counselling

Page 18: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 18

Recent cases

Page 19: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 19

Recent cases 1 of 4Syncrude v Donald (ALBERTA)

Page 20: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 20

Recent cases 2 of 4LOCKERBIE caseFactors the Court sets out to evaluate whether a company has an “employment” relationship with an individual under human rights laws, i.e., whether that person can sue for employment discrimination:The existence of another employer;Who controls and directs the work;Who pays the wages and does the payroll;

Page 21: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 21

Recent cases 3 of 4LOCKERBIE caseWho the individual perceives to be his employer; andThe extent to which the individual is part of your organization

Page 22: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 22

Recent cases 4 of 4Irving Pulp & Paper, Limited v. Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada (NEW BRUNSWICK)

Page 23: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 23

Drugs

Page 24: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 24

DrugsBarbiturates and benzodiazepinesCocaine, methamphetamine and other stimulantsMarijuana and hashishNarcotics and opioids

Page 25: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 25

The big five

Page 26: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 26

The big fiveAlcoholCocaineGamblingMarijuanaSex

Page 27: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 27

Job performance indicators

Page 28: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 28

Job performance indicatorsGeneralLatenessAccidentsMoraleAbsenteeism

Page 29: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 29

The nature of addiction

Page 30: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 30

The nature of addictionPhysical factorsPsychological factorsSocial factorsSpiritual

Page 31: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 31

Continuum of substance use

Page 32: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 32

Continuum of substance useUseMisuseAbuseDependencyAddiction

Page 33: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 33

Causes of addiction

Page 34: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 34

Causes of addictionBiological predispositionSocial primingEarly childhood attachmentTrauma experiencesBio psychosocial model encompasses all elements and recognizes synergistic interaction between them

Page 35: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 35

Who is the substance abusing or dependent

employee?

Page 36: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 36

Who is the substance abusing or dependent

employee? 1 of 2The vast majority of substance dependentpeople hold down employmentMost of these people are not identified as having aproblem (est. 70% remain unnoticed)Have higher rates of absenteeism, presenteeism, accidents, illness and disability claimsCan make the workplace vulnerable to theft/fraudor costly mistakes

Page 37: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 37

Who is the substance abusing or dependent

employee? 2 of 2Often negatively impact morale amongst teams(“covering”)Contribute to higher rates of turnover amongst employeesMay impair the company reputation or “brand” ifaddiction is public

Page 38: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 38

Signs and symptoms

Page 39: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 39

Signs and symptomsObviousSubtle signsBehavioural and healthPerformance

Page 40: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 40

Workplace factors associated with higher

rates of addiction

Page 41: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 41

Workplace factors associated with higher rates

of addictionRepetitive jobs with little sense of control/inputWorking independently or with little directsupervisionCo-workers who condone or encouragesubstance useJobs that allow the employee to be highly mobileHigh stress jobs with no opportunity todebrief/receive supportLack of official policy or company position onsubstance use

Page 42: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 42

Options available

Page 43: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 43

Options availableThe substance abusing employeeThe dependent employeeFor all substance involved employees

Page 44: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 44

Legal drugs that can impair reaction time

Page 45: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 45

Legal drugs that can impair reaction time 1 of 2

Anti-anxiety medicationAmphetaminesBarbituratesStimulantsNarcotic pain medicationsBlood sugar medicines

Page 46: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 46

Legal drugs that can impair reaction time 2 of 2

AntidepressantsTranquilizersAnti-seizure medicinesSedativesMedicines containing alcoholAntihistamines

Page 47: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 47

Drug testing

Page 48: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 48

Drug testing ReasonablenessTesting prior to employment“For cause” testingTesting on a random basisWhat policies should containPolicy breaches

Page 49: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 49

Conclusion and questions

Page 50: Dealing with addictions in the workplace March 2012

Page 50

Conclusion and questionsSummaryVideosQuestions