decisión de la national labor relations board en caso ikea puerto rico 2014
TRANSCRIPT
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 1/13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE N TION L L BOR REL TIONS BO RD
SUBREGION 24
SARTON DOMINICANA, S.A.S./IKEA
and
Cases 12-CA-129677
CENTRAL GENERAL DE TRABAJADORES
2-CA-131346
12-CA-133226
and
ANDRES CORCHADO-MILLAN, An Individual
ase 12-CA-130545
ORDER CO NSOLIDATING CASES
CONSOLID TED COMPL INT ND NOTICE OF HE RING
Pursuant to Section 102.33 of the Rules and Regulations of the National Labor Relations
Board (the Board) and to avoid unnecessary costs or delay, IT IS ORDERED THAT Cases 12-
CA-129677, 12-CA-131346 and 12-CA-133226, which are based on charges filed by Central
General de Trabajadores (the Union) against Sarton Dominicana, S.A.S./IKEA (Respondent)
and Case 12-CA-130545, which is based on a charge filed by Andres Corchado-Millan, an
Individual (Corchado), against Respondent, are consolidated.
This Order Consolidating Cases, Consolidated Complaint and Notice of Hearing, which
is based on these charges, is issued pursuant to Section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations
Act (the Act), 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. and Section 102.15 of the Board s Rules and Regulations,
and alleges that Respondent has violated the Act as described below.
1
The charges in the above cases were filed by the respective Charging Parties, as set
forth in the following table, and served on Respondent on the dates indicated, by regular mail:
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 2/13
Case No.
Amend
ment
harging Party
Date Filed
Date Served
12-CA-129677
Union
May 29, 2014
May 30, 2014
12-CA-129677
Amended
Union June 11, 2014 June 12, 2014
12-CA-130545
Corchado
June 11,2014 June 11,2014
12-CA-130545
First
Amended
Corchado
August 5, 2014
August 5, 2014
12-CA-130545
Second
Amended
Corchado September 25, 2014
September 25, 2014
12-CA-131346
Union
June 23 2014
June 24, 2014
12-CA-133226 Union
July 22 2014
July 22, 2014
12-CA-133226
Amended Union
September 25, 2014
September 25, 2014
2.
(a)
At all material times, Respondent has been a corporation with an office and place of
business in Carolina, Puerto Rico, herein called Respondent's Carolina facility, and has been
engaged in the retail sale of furniture and related products.
(b)
Respondent in conducting its operations described above in paragraph 2(a),
purchased and received at its Carolina, Puerto Rico facility goods valued in excess of 50,000
directly from points outside the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
(c)
At all material times, Respondent has been an employer engaged in commerce
within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and (7) of the Act.
3.
At all material times, the Union has been a labor organization within the meaning of
Section 2(5) of the Act.
2
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 3/13
4
At all material times, the following individuals held the positions set forth opposite their
respective names and have been supervisors of Respondent within the meaning of Section
2(11) of the Act and agents of Respondent within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the Act):
Santos Celpa
upervisor
Omar Garcia
upervisor
Lizardo Lopez
arehouse Manager
Sandra Olivar-Castro
irector of Human Resources
Ernie Pena
upervisor
William Rosario
ssistant to the Director of Human Resources
5
(a)
The following employees of Respondent (Unit A) constitute a unit appropriate for
purposes of collective-bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act:
All regular full-time warehouse employees who work at the Employer s
warehouse in Carolina, Puerto Rico; excluding all other employees, guards and
supervisors as defined in the Act.
(b) On January 21, 2014, the Union was certified as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of Unit A.
(c)
At all times since January 21, 2014, based on Section 9(a) of the Act, the
Union has been the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of Unit A.
6
(a)
The following employees of Respondent (Unit
B
constitute a unit appropriate for
purposes of collective-bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act:
All regular part-time warehouse employees who work at the Employers
warehouse in Carolina, Puerto Rico; excluding all other employees, guards and
supervisors as defined in the Act.
(b)
On February 18, 2014, the Union was certified as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of Unit
B.
3
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 4/13
c) At all times since February 18, 2014, based on Section 9 a) of the Act,
the Union tias been the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of Unit B.
7.
Since on or about February 1, 2014, Respondent has maintained the following rules in
its Employee Handbook:
Conduct that requires disciplinary action, suspension or discharge.
Although it is not possible to give a list of all conduct that could be considered
unacceptable, the following are violations of the code of conduct that due to the
severity and negative impact on the operations of the company could require
disciplinary action suspe nsion or discharge .
34. Solicit or engage in any solicitation activity during working hours, inside
company premises or that interferes with the work of other employees.
40. Distribute printed material or material of any kind not related to the work
performed in the company to other employees while they are performing their
tasks during working hours and/or in working areas.
8.
a)
On or about a date in late April or early May, 2014, Respondent, by Ernie Perla, at
its Carolina facility, threatened to discharge employees because they chose to be represented
by the Union and engaged in union activities.
b)
On or about May 13, 14 and 15, 2014, Respondent, by Santos Celpa, at its Carolina
facility, threatened employees with closer supervision and discharge because of their activities
on behalf of and sympathies for the Union.
9.
a)
On or about May 23, 2014, Respondent discharged its employee Andres Corchado-
Milian.
b)
Respondent engaged in the conduct described above in paragraph 9 a) because the
named employee of Respondent formed, joined, and assisted the Union and engaged in
conce rted activities and to discourag e employees from engag ing in these activities.
4
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 5/13
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 6/13
(c)
Respondent exercised discretion in imposing the discharge described above in
paragraph 9(a).
(d)
The subject set forth above in paragraphs 9(a) and 9(c), relates to wages, hours,
and other terms and conditions of employment of Unit A and is a mandatory subject for the
purposes of collective bargaining.
(e)
Respondent engaged in the conduct described above in paragraphs 9(a) and 9(c)
without prior notice to the Union and without affording the Union an opportunity to bargain with
Respondent with respect to this conduct.
10
(a)
Since on or about June 23, 2014, the Union has designated Andres Corchado-Millan
as a member of its bargaining committee and its agent for the purposes of negotiating a
collective-bargaining agreement with Respondent with respect to the wages, hours and other
terms and conditions of employment of Unit A and Unit B.
(b)
Since on or about June 23, 2014, Respondent has failed and refused to meet and
bargain with the Union as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of Unit A and Unit B
unless Andres Corchado-Millan ceased to be a member of the Union s bargaining committee.
11
By the conduct described above in paragraphs 7, 8(a) and 8(b), Respondent has been
interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in
Section 7 of the Act, in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act.
12
By the conduct described above in paragraphs 9(a) and 9(b), Respondent has been
discriminating in regard to the hire or tenure or terms or conditions of employment of its
employees, thereby encouraging membership in a labor organization, in violation of Section
8(a)(1) and (3) of the Act.
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 7/13
13.
By the conduct described above in paragraphs 9(a), 9(c), 9(e) and 10(b), Respondent
has been failing and refusing to bargain collectively and in good faith with the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of its employees, in violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of
the Act.
14.
The unfair labor practices of Respondent described above affect commerce within the
meaning of Section 2 6) and 7) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, as part of the remedy for the unfair labor practices alleged above, the
General Counsel seeks an Order requiring Respondent s representative to read the Notice to
Employees in Spanish during working time in the presence of a Board Agent at a meeting or
meetings scheduled to ensure the widest possible attendance. Alternatively, the General
Counsel seeks an order requiring that Respondent permit a Board Agent to read the Notice to
Employees in Spanish during work time in the presence of Respondent s representative at a
meeting or meetings scheduled to ensure the widest possible attendance.
As a further remedy for the unfair labor practices alleged above, the General Counsel
seeks an Order requiring Respondent to bargain in good faith with the Union, on request, for the
period required by
Mar-Jac P oultry 136 NLRB 785 1962), as the recognized bargaining
representative of Unit A and Unit B.
The General Counsel further seeks all other relief as may be just and proper to remedy
the unfair labor practices alleged.
NSWER REQUIREMENT
Respondent is notified that, pursuant to Sections 102.20 and 102.21 of the Board s
Rules and Regulations, it must file an answer to the consolidated complaint. The answer must
be
received by this office on or before October 14 2014 or postmarked on or before
6
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 8/13
October 13 2014.
Respondent should file an original and four copies of the answer with this
office and serve a dopy of the answer on each of the other parties
An answer may also be filed electronically through the Agency s website. To file
electronically, go to www.nlrb.00v, click on E-File Documents enter the NLRB Case Number,
and follow the detailed instructions. The responsibility for the receipt and usability of the answer
rests exclusively upon the sender. Unless notification on the Agency s website informs users
that the Agency s E-Filing system is officially determined to be in technical failure because it is
unable to receive documents for a continuous period of more than 2 hours after 12:00 noon
(Eastern Time) on the due date for filing, a failure to timely file the answer will not be excused
on the basis that the transmission could not be accomplished because the Agency s website
was off-line or unavailable for some other reason. The Board s Rules and Regulations require
that an answer be signed by counsel or non-attorney representative for represented parties or
by the party if not represented. See Section 102.21. If the answer being filed electronically is a
pdf document containing the required signature, no paper copies of the answer need to be
transmitted to the Regional Office. However, if the electronic version of an answer to a
complaint is not a pdf file containing the required signature, then the E-filing rules require that
such answer containing the required signature continue to be submitted to the Regional Office
by traditional means within three (3) business days after the date of electronic filing. Service of
the answer on each of the other parties must still be accomplished by means allowed under the
Board s Rules and Regulations. The answer may not be filed by facsimile transmission. If no
answer is filed, or if an answer is filed untimely, the Board may find, pursuant to a Motion for
Default Judgment, that the allegations in the consolidated complaint are true.
NOTICE OF HE RING
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on
December 10 2014 at 9:30 a.m. at the NLRB
Hearing Room La Torre de Plaza Plaza Las Americas Mall Suite 1002 525 F.D.
Roosevelt Ave. San Juan Puerto Rico
and on consecutive days thereafter until concluded, a
7
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 9/13
hearing will be conducted before an administrative law judge of the National Labor Relations
Board. At the hearing Respondent and any other party to this proceeding have the right to
appear and present testimony regarding the allegations in this consolidated complaint. The
procedures to be followed at the hearing are described in the attached Form NLRB-4668. The
procedure to request a postponement of the hearing is described in the attached Form NLRB-
4338.
Dated this 30
t day of September 2014.
cug
Margaret J. az Regid al Directcr
National Labor Relations Board R
201 E. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 530
Tampa
L
33602-5824
12
Attachments
8
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 10/13
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
Case
ate Filed
12-CA-129677
une 11,2014
Form NLR B -501 (2-08)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
AMENDED CHARGE AGAINST EMPLOYER
INSTRUCTIONS:
•
• •,, thk
fh MI PR PAninnI flirpc tnr in whic.h the allened unfair labor oractice occurred or is occunin
.
. EMPLOYER AGAINST WHOM CHARGE IS BROUGHT
a. Name of Em ployer
SARTON DOMINICANA, SAS/IKEA
b.
Tel. No.
787-750-4519
c.
Cell No.
d.
Address (street, city, state ZIP code)
PO BOX 8700
CAROLINA, PR 00982
e.
Employer Representative
SANDRA OL1VAR CASTRO, HUMAN
RESOURCES DIRECTOR
f.
Fax No.
g.
h.
Dispute Location (City and State)
San Juan, PR
i.
Type of Establishment (factory, nursing home,
hotel)
RETAIL
j.
Principal Product o r S ervice
IMPORT, EXPORT SALE AND
DISTRIBUTION
k.
Number of workers at dispute location
20
I. The above-named employer has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of section 8(a), subsections (1)
and 5)
of
the National Labor Relations Act, and these unfair abor practices are practices affecting commerce within the meaning of the Act, or these unfair
labor practices are unfair practices affecting commerce within the meaning of the Act and the Postal Reorganization Act.
2.
Basis of the Charge
set forth a clear and concise statement of the facts constituting the alleged unfair labor practices)
On or about May 23, 2014, the Employer, through its officers, agents and representatives, terminated the employee
Andres Corchado Milian without prior notification and/or bargaining with Central General de Trabajadores.
3.
Full name of party filing charge
If labor organ ization, give full name , including local name and num ber)
CENTRAL GENERAL DE TRABAJADORES
4a. Address (street and number, city, state, and ZIP code)
PO BOX 192901
SAN JUAN, PR 00919-2901
4b.
Tel. No.
787-250-8074
4c.
Cell No.
787-348-7616
4d.
Fax No.
4e.
5.
Full name of national or international labor organization of which it is an affiliate or constituent unit
to be filled in when charge is filed by a labor
organization)
6. DECLARATION
eclare that I have read the above charge and that the statements are true to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Tel. No.
787-250-8074
Jose B udet, Representative
Office, if any, Cell No.
787-348-7616
(signature of r esentative or person making charge)
rint Name an d Tit le
Address: S
s 4a
ate: 6/11/2014
Fax No.
WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS ON THIS CHARGE CAN BE PUNISHED BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT U.S. CODE, TITLE IS, SECTION 1001
PRIV CY CT ST TEME NT
Solicitation of the information on this form is authorized by the National Labor Relations Act NLRA ), 29 U.S.C. § 151
et seq
The principal use of the information is
assist the National Labor Relations Board NLR B) in processing unfair labor practice and related proceedings or litigation. The routine uses for the information are fu
set forth in the Federal Register, 71 Fed. Reg. 74942-43 Dec. 13, 2006). The NLRB will further explain these uses upon request. Disclosure of this information to the
NLRB is voluntary; however, failure to supply the information will cause the NLRB to decline to invoke its processes.
-10819865
022.1-81600 8d NVIIr N V.
;101D]el
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 11/13
Form NLRB - 501 2-08)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
CHARGE AGAINST EMPLOYER
INSTRUCTIONS
DO NOT W RITE IN THIS SPACE
Case
ate Filed
12-CA-131346
une 23, 2014
tonal Director in which the alleged unfair labor practice occurred o r is occurring.
1. EMPLOYER AGAINST WHOM CHARGE IS BROUGHT
a. Name of Em ployer
SARTON DOMINICANA, SAS/ IKEA
b.
Tel. No.
787-750-4519
c.Cell No.
d.
Address street, city, state ZIP code)
P O B O X 8700
CAROLINA, PR 00982
e Employer Representative
SANDR A OLIVAR CASTRO, HUMAN
RESOURCES DIRECTOR
f.Fax No.
g.
h.Dispute Location City and State)
i Type of Establishment factory, nursing home,
hotel)
RETAIL
j. Principal Product or Service
IMPORT, EXPORT SALE AN D
DISTRIBUTION
k. Number of workers at dispute location
20
I . The above-nam ed em ployer has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of section 8 a), subsections 1) 5) of the
National Labor Relations Act, and these unfair labor practices are practices affecting commerce within the meaning of the Act, or these unfair labor
practices are unfair practices affecting com m erce within the meaning o f the Act and the Po stal Reorganization Act.
2.
Basis of the Charge
set forth a clear and concise statem ent of the facts constituting the alleged unfair labor practices)
Since about June 23, 2014, the Employer has failed to bargain collectively and in good faith with the Union
Central General de Trabajadores, CGT by refusing to meet and bargain with designated representatives of
the Union, including Pedro Torres, Carmelo Cora, Hector Rosario and Andres Corchado.
3.Full name of party filing charge if labor organization, give full name, including local name and numb er)
CENTRAL GENERAL DE TRABAJADORES
4a. Address street and number, city, state, and ZIP code)
PO BOX 192901
SAN JUAN, PR 00919-2901
4b. Tel. No.
787-250-8074
4c.
Cell No.
787-348-7676
4d.
Fax No.
4e. e-Mail
5.
ull name of national or international labor organization of which it is an affiliate or constituent unit to be filled in when charge:IL:filedifix a labor
organization)
c_ L
_
6. DECLARATION
I declare that I have read the above charge and that the statements are true to the best of
my knowledge and belief
Tel. No.
= - i
r
z
\
o
-
-
-c c _ _ •
co , — 7:
)
By:
armelo Cora, Union Delegate
Office, if any, Cell
D
...: - • ---
939-287
o.
1 3
. : . -
•.
)
i
signature of representative or person making charge)
rint Name and Title
Address: same
ame as 4 a)
ate: 6/23/2014
Fax No.
-
-
•--
1
..)
yanmichae1007@
il.com
WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS ON THIS CHARGE CAN BE PUNISHED BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, SECTION 1001)
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Solicitation of the inform ation on this form is authorized by the National Labor Relations Act NL RA), 29 U.S.C. § 151
et seq.
The principal use of the inform ation is t
assist the National Labor Relations Bo ard NL RB ) in processing unfair labor practice and related proceediags or litigation. The routine uses for the inform ation are ful
set forth in the Federal Register, 71 Fed. Reg 74942-43 Dec. 13, 2006). The N LR B will further explain these uses upon request. Disclosure of this inform ation to the
NL RB is voluntary; however, failure to supply the inform ation will cause the NLR B to decline to invoke its processes.
-109063449
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 12/13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
AMENDED CHARGE AGAINST EMPLOYER
INSTRUCTIONS:
File an original of this charge with NLRB Regional Director in w nich the alleged unfair labor
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
Case
Date Fi led
12 CA 133226
25 014
practice occurred or is occurring.
1. EMPLOYER AGAINST WHOM CHARGE IS BROUGHT
a. Name of Employer
SARTON DO MINICANA, SAS/IKEA
b.Tel. No.
787-750-4519
c.
Cell No.
d.
Address (street, city, state ZIP code )
PO BOX 8700
CAROLINA, PR 00982
e.
Employer Representative
SANDRA OLIVAR CASTRO, HUMAN
RESOURCES DIRECTOR
f.
Fax No.
g.
h.Dispute Location (City and State)
San Juan, PR
i.
Type of Establishment (factory, nursing home.
hotel)
RETAIL
j Principal Product or Service
IMPORT, EXPORT SALE AND
DISTRIBUTION
k. Number of workers at dispute location
20
I . The above-named employer has eng aged in and Is engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of section 8(a), subsections (1)
f the
National Labor Relat ions Act, and these unfair labor practices are practices affecting commerce within he meaning of the Act, or these unfair labor practices
are unfair practices affecting commerce within the meaning of the Act and the Postal Reorganization Act.
2.
Basis of the Charge
set forth a clear and concise statement of the facts constituting the alleged unfair labor practices)
Since on or abou t the past six months the Employer ha s maintained an ove rly broad no distribution/no solicitation rule in its
employee manu al.
3.
Full name of p arty f iling charge
if labor organization, give full name, including local name and number)
CENTRAL GENERAL DE TRABAJADORES
4a. Address (street and num ber, city, state, and ZIP code)
PO BOX 192901
San Ju an, PR 00919-2901
4b.
Tel. No.
787-250-8074
4c. Cell No.
4d. Fax No.
4e.
e-Mall
5.
Full name of national or international labor organization of which it is an affiliate or constituent unit
to be filled in when charge is filed bye labor
organization)
6.
DECLARATION
I declare that I have read the above charge and that the statements
are true
to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Tel. No.
787 220 0316
Jose Budet, Union
By.
Representative
Office, if any, Cell No.
787 348 7616
(sign
of representative or person making charge)
rint Name and Tit le
Add
: Same as 4a
ate:
Fax No.
WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS ON THIS CHARGE CAN BE PUNISHED BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, SECTION 1001)
PRIVACY AC7 STATEM ENT
Solicitation of the information on this form is authorized by the National Labor Relations Act NLRA ). 29 U.S.C. § 151
l s q
The principal use of the information is to
assist the National Labor Relations Board NLRB) in processing unfair labor practice and related proceedings or li tigation. The routine
us s
for the information are fully
set forth in the Federal Register, 71 Fed. Reg. 74 942-43 Dec. 13, 200 6). The NLRB will further explain these uses upon request. Disclosure of this information to the
NLRB is voluntary; however, failure to supply the information will cause the NLR B to decline to invoke its processes.
L
„ e?
,y1/07
•
F 6 1 7
02z
8/10/2019 Decisión de la National Labor Relations Board en caso IKEA Puerto Rico 2014
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/decision-de-la-national-labor-relations-board-en-caso-ikea-puerto-rico-2014 13/13
- 501
.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
SECOND AMENDED CHARG E AGAINST EMPLOYER
INSTRUCTIONS:
File an original of this charge with NLRB Regional Director in which the alleged unfair labor
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SP CE
s
Case
Date Filed
12-CA-130545
SEP 25
014
practice occurred or is occurring.
1. EMPLOYER AGAINST WHOM CHARGE IS BROUGHT
a. Name of Employer
SARTON DOMINICANA, SAS/ IK EA
b.
Tel. No.
787 750 4519
c.
Cell No.
d.
Address (street, city, state ZIP code)
PO BOX 8700
CAROL INA, PR 00 982
e.
Employer Representative
SANDRA OLI VAR CASTRO, HUMAN
RESOURCES DIRECTOR
f.
Fax No.
g.
h.
Dispute Locat ion (City arid S tate)
San Juan, PR
i.
ype of Establishment (factory, nursing home,
hotel)
RETAIL
j.Principal Product or Service
IMPORT, EXPORT SALE AND
DISTRIBUTION
k.
Numbe r of workers at dispute locat ion
20
I . The above-named employer has engaged In and Is engaging in unfair labor practices within the m eaning of sect ion 8(a), subsections (1) and (3) of the
National Labor Relations Act, and these unfair labor practices are practices affecting commerce within the meaning of the Act, or these unfair labor practices
are unfair practices affecting_commerce within the meaning_of the Act and the Postal Reorganization Act.
2.
Basis of the Charge
set forth a
clear and con cise statement of the facts constituting the alleged unfair labor practices)
Since on or about A pri l 22, 2014, the E mployer, through its off icers, agents and representatives, has interfered with,
restrained, and coerced its employees by threatening em ployees with discharge and w ith unspecif ied threats of reprisals
in order to discourage union activit ies or m embe rship.
On or abou t May 23, 201 4, the Employer, through its off icers, agents and representatives, terminated the employee
Andres C orchado Mil ian because of his support of Central General de Trabajadores and be cause he expressed h is
preferences to be part of the barga ining unit represented by Central Gene ral de Trabajadores by resigning to his team
leader po sit ion.
3.
Full name o f party f i ling charge
if labor organization, give full name, including local name and number)
Andres Corchado Mil ian
4a. Address (street and numbe r, c ity, state, and ZIP code)
Urb. Interamericana Gardens
AC 31 ca l le 15
Trujillo Alto,
PR00976
4b.Tel. No.
787-220-0316
4c.
Cell No.
4d.
Fax No.
4e.
5.
Full name of national or international labor organization of which it is an affiliate or constituent unit
to be filled in when cha rge is filed by a labor
organization)
6.
DECLARATION
I declare that I have read the above charge and that the statements are true to the best of
my knowledge and
belief.
Tel. No.
787-348-7616
Jose Budet, R epresentative
Office, if any, Cell No.
By.
(signatj4 of representat ive or person m aking charge)
rint Name and Title
Add
PO BOX 1 92901, San Juan, PR 00919-2901
ate:
Fax No.787-282-6122
WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS ON THIS CHARGE CAN BE PUNISHED BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, SECTION 1001)
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Solicitation of the information on this form is authorized by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 1 51
s s g
The principal use of the information is to
assist the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) m processing unfair labor practice and related proceedings or litigation. The routine uses for the Information are fully
set forth in the Federal Register, 71 Fed. Reg. 74942-43 (Dec. 13,
MO.TherNp1B-will fitrthe
explain these uses upon request. Disclosure of this information to the
NLRB is voluntary; how ever, failure to supply the informa tion will caUle'the Thfifi isi•dectitie t'd inirac'e its
-
processes.
•
LE:6 1
7
n7
P.o1D7-j