decompositions of graphs into closed trails of even sizes sylwia cichacz agh university of science...
TRANSCRIPT
Decompositions of graphs into closed trails of even sizes
Sylwia Cichacz
AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
Decompositions of pseudographs
Decompositions of complete bipartite digraphsand even complete bipartite multigraphs
Part 2
Part 3
Part 1
Part 4
Definition
Problem
• graph G of size ||G||
Decomposition
• sequence (t1,...,tp) ||||1
Gtp
ii
•
there is a closed trail of length in (for all ).it G i•
Df. 1. G is ,
arbitrarily decomposable into closed trails
iff G can be edge-disjointly decomposed into closed trails (T1,...,Tp) of lengths (t1,...,tp) resp.
• graph G of size ||G||=12
Example
• sequence (6,6) • sequence (4,4,4)
• there are closed trails of lengths 4,6,8 in G
G
• sequence (4,8)
Observation
If G is arbitrarily decomposable into closed trails,
then G is eulerian.
• there is a closed trail of length 3 in K4
K4 can not be edge-disjointly
decomposed into closed trails of lengths (3,3).
K4
Irregular coloring
1
1
1
22
2
}1,1,1{
}2,2,2{
}2,1{
1
}1,1{
}1{
2
}2,1{
2}2{
1}2,2,1{
1
}1,1{
2}2,2,1{
3
}3,1{
}3,2,1{
1
1
12
2 2}1,1,1{
}2,2,2{
1 1
2
2}1{
}2{
}2,1{
}1,1{
}2,2{
}2,2,1{
}2,1,1{
)(Gc
G
- irregularnumber
2)( Gc
Results
• 2-regular graph of size
ptt CCG 1
ntGp
ii
1
T.1. [M. Aigner, E. Triesch, Zs. Tuza, 1992]:
)1(8)( nGc
T.2. [P. Wittmann, 1997]:
)1(2)( nGc
ptt ,,1 - even
T.3. [S. C., J. Przybyło, M. Woźniak, 2005]:
nn 2,12 n2 12, n
)(Gc
)(Gc
nGc 2)(
Results
2
nL• n is odd, or , or3
2
n
L
.22nn
L
• n is even, - irregular number for proper coloring
)(' Gs
,1
p
iitLT.4. [P.N. Balister, 2001]. Let .3it
nKThen we can write same subgraph of as an edge
ptt ,,1 disjoint union of circuits of lengths iff either:
T.5. [P.N. Balister, B. Bollobás, R.H. Schelp,2002] Let G be a 2-regular graph of order n. Then
242)(' nGs
Results
ptt CCG 1
• ptt ,,1 - even•
L.1. If , then we can edge-disjointlyk
p
ii Lt
1pack closed trails of lengths into .kLptt ,,1
L.2. If , then is edge-disjointlyk
p
ii Lt
1kL
decomposable into closed trails of lengths .ptt ,,1
k )6( k- even•
The graph is edge-disjointly decomposablebaK ,
into closed trails of lengths iff:q ,,1
T.5. [M. Horňák, M. Woźniak, 2003]:
ba, - even• baq
jj
1
•
j baK , j• there is a closed trail of length in (for all ).
4it•
ProofL.2. If , then is edge-disjointlyk
p
ii Lt
1kL
decomposable into closed trails of lengths .ptt ,,1
kL
2kL
4kL4L2,2 kK4,4 kK
Proof:
2k4k
Proof
L.1. If , then we can edge-disjointlyk
p
ii Lt
1pack closed trails of lengths into .kLptt ,,1
L.2. If , then is edge-disjointlyk
p
ii Lt
1kL
decomposable into closed trails of lengths .ptt ,,1 k
p
ii Lt
1
•
21
k
p
ii Lt•
6L
Application
ptt CCG 1
• ptt ,,1 - even•
kGc )(
2kLkL1kL
ntGp
ii
1
•
kkGc ,1)(
n n
nn 2,12 n2 12, n
n2
k )6( k- even•
Definitions
- digraph obtained from graph G by replacing each edge by the pair of arcs xy and yx.)(, GEyx G�
- multigraph where each edge xy occurs with multiplicity r.Gr
Reminder
,1
p
iitLT.4. [P.N. Balister, 2001]. Let .3it
nKThen we can write same subgraph of as an edge
ptt ,,1 disjoint union of circuits of lengths iff either:
2
nL• n is odd, or , or3
2
n
L
.22nn
L
• n is even,
,2
21
p
ii
nt ,2it
nK�
,,,1 ptt
.3it
then can be decomposed as edge-disjoint
except in the case when n=6 and all
T.7. [P.N. Balister, 2003] If
union of directed closed trails of lengths
,2
,31
p
ii
nrtn
.2it
of closed trails of lengths iff either ptt ,,1 n
r KThen can be written as edge-disjoint union
T.8. [P.N. Balister, 2003] Assume
a) r is even, or
2 2it
i
ntb) r and n are both odd and
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 T.9. The digraph is edge-disjointly decomposablebaK ,
�
bratp
ii
1
•
Results
j baK , j• there is a closed trail of length in (for all ).
.
The graph is edge-disjointly decomposablebaK ,
into closed trails of lengths iff:q ,,1
T.6. [M. Horňák, M. Woźniak, 2003]
ba, - even• baq
jj
1
•
it - even• batp
ii
2
1•
T.10. Let
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 The multigraph is edge-disjointly decomposableba
r K ,
• r - odd • a,b - even it - even•
abtit
i 2
• if 4, baabtt
ii ti
ti
)4(mod2)4(mod0)2(• if a=2 or b=2
• we fix the number of the vertex set B and will argue on induction on a
Proof
Proof:
• bK ,1
�• 2ainto closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 T.9. The digraph is edge-disjointly decomposablebaK ,
�
it - even• batp
ii
2
1•
bK ,1
�baK ,
�baK ,1
�baK ,
�
Proofinto closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 T.9. The digraph is edge-disjointly decomposablebaK ,
�
it - even• batp
ii
2
1•
k
ii btk
12: (t1,…tk) (tk+1,…tp)
bK ,1
�baK ,1
�
Proof
bK ,1
�
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 T.9. The digraph is edge-disjointly decomposablebaK ,
�
it - even• batp
ii
2
1•
k
ibtk
11 2: and
1
11 2
k
ibt ''' kkk ttt
1
12'
k
iki btt 2'',' kk tt
'',' kk tt - even
)',,...,( 11 kk ttt ),...,,'( 1 pkk ttt
baK ,1
�
bK ,1
�baK ,1
�
'kT
''kT
v ww
baK ,
�
kT
into closed trails of lengths iff:qtt ,,1 T.9. The digraph is edge-disjointly decomposablebaK ,
�
it - even• batp
ii
2
1•
The multigraph is edge-disjointly decomposable
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1
Observation 11. Let r be even.
bar K ,
Results
it - even• abrtp
ii
1•
Proof
The multigraph is edge-disjointly decomposable
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1
Observation 11. Let r be even.
bar K ,
it - even• abrtp
ii
1
•
Proof:
• we consider as an edge-disjoint union of and
bar K ,
baK ,2
bar K ,
2
T.9. (digraphs) induction on r
T.10. Let
• a,b - even• r - odd bratp
ii
1• it - even•
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 The multigraph is edge-disjointly decomposableba
r K ,
abttii t
it
i )4(mod2)4(mod0
)2(• if a=2 or b=2
abtit
i 2
• if 4, ba
Proof
6),62,6,2( )1(
2 bbbr
barK ,)2( 2
1
rab
b
r K ,2
The multigraph is edge-disjointly decomposableba
r K ,
T.10. Let • a,b - even• r - odd bratp
ii
1• it - even•
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 abtt
ii ti
ti
)4(mod2)4(mod0)2(• if a=2 or b=2
abtit
i 2• if 4, ba
Proof
• we consider as an edge-disjoint union of and ba
r K ,1
bar K ,
baK ,
• Case 1. a=2 or b=2
• Case 2. 4, ba
T.6. [M. Horňák, M. Woźniak] Ob.11. (for even multiplicity)
The multigraph is edge-disjointly decomposableba
r K ,
T.10. Let • a,b - even• r - odd bratp
ii
1• it - even•
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 abtt
ii ti
ti
)4(mod2)4(mod0)2(• if a=2 or b=2
abtit
i 2• if 4, ba
Proof
• Case 1. a=2 or b=2 mtiMij
,...,1)4(mod0:1
rmtiMij
,...,12:2
rmtiMij
,...,1)4(mod2:3
Let be the smallest integer such thatrk 2)2(
11
k
rii
m
ii jj
tt
2'',2' iii jjj ttt for i=r+1,…,k
The multigraph is edge-disjointly decomposableba
r K ,
T.10. Let • a,b - even• r - odd bratp
ii
1• it - even•
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 abtt
ii ti
ti
)4(mod2)4(mod0)2(• if a=2 or b=2
abtit
i 2• if 4, ba
Proof
• Case 1. a=2 or b=2 mtiMij
,...,1)4(mod0:1
rmtiMij
,...,12:2
rmtiMij
,...,1)4(mod2:3
2'',2' iii jjj ttt for i=r+1,…,k
bK ,2b
r K ,21
The multigraph is edge-disjointly decomposableba
r K ,
T.10. Let • a,b - even• r - odd bratp
ii
1• it - even•
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 abtt
ii ti
ti
)4(mod2)4(mod0)2(• if a=2 or b=2
abtit
i 2• if 4, ba
Proof
ptt ...1
Let be the smallest integer such thatpk abtk
ii
1
1
12
k
ii abt '',' kk tt - even
)',,...,( 11 kk ttt ),...,,''( 1 pkk ttt
abttttt k
k
iikkk
':'''
1
1
0'',4' kk tt
baK , bar K ,
• Case 2. 4, ba
The multigraph is edge-disjointly decomposableba
r K ,
T.10. Let • a,b - even• r - odd bratp
ii
1• it - even•
into closed trails of lengths iff:ptt ,,1 abtt
ii ti
ti
)4(mod2)4(mod0)2(• if a=2 or b=2
abtit
i 2• if 4, ba
Proof
ptt ...1
1
12
k
ii abt
'',' kk tt - even
)',,...,( 11 kk ttt ),...,,'( 21 pkk ttt
2',6' 1 kk tt
baK ,ba
r K ,
1
• Case 2. 4, ba
2',2' 11 kkkk tttt
baK ,ba
r K ,1
'kT '1kT kT
1kT
Problem• sequence (t1,...,tp), .3it
• graph Ln, n>2.
itf
30 it41 it
52
ii t
t
Necessity:
p
ini Lt
1•
p
ii ntf
1)(•
IT IS NOT ENOUGH?
Problem• sequence (t1,...,tp), .3it
• graph Ln, n>2.
Necessity:
p
ini Lt
1•
p
ii ntf
1)(•
Example
,186 L (3 , 3 , 6 , 6 )
6)(4
1
iitf
6L