defending parents

36
DEFENDING PARENTS Building a Healthy Child Welfare System

Upload: cadman-wilson

Post on 02-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Defending Parents. Building a Healthy Child Welfare System. Starting from the Beginning. Colorado Children’s Code C.R.S. §19-1-102 Legislative Declaration: The general assembly declares that the purposes of this title are: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Defending Parents

DEFENDING PARENTSBuilding a Healthy Child Welfare System

Page 2: Defending Parents

Starting from the BeginningStarting from the Beginning

Colorado Children’s Code C.R.S. §19-1-102Legislative Declaration: 1.The general assembly declares that the purposes of

this title are:a) To secure for each child subject to these provisions such

care and guidance, preferably in his own home, as will best serve his welfare and the interests of society;

b) To preserve and strengthen family ties whenever possible, including improvement of home environment…

2.To carry out these purposes, the provisions of this title shall be liberally construed to serve the welfare of the children and the best interests of society.

Page 3: Defending Parents

Department InvestigationDepartment Investigation

Page 4: Defending Parents

Defense Tip: Appeals of Defense Tip: Appeals of Department FindingsDepartment Findings

How it can help family once court involved: Volume 7.202.604, Notice to the Person Found to be Responsible for Child Abuse or Neglect

7.202.605 State-Level Appeal Appeal forms online at www.colorado.gov/cs/satellite/DPA-OAC/OAC/1214473755413

Page 5: Defending Parents

Founded Reports: Several Choices for Founded Reports: Several Choices for the Departmentthe Department

Voluntary case Involuntary case, or court action Remove or not remove Court action See Volume 7.202.5 Investigation

Procedures See Volume 7.202.62, Provision of

Ongoing Child Protection Services

Page 6: Defending Parents

Defense Tip: Colorado Defense Tip: Colorado Assessment ContinuumAssessment Continuum

What is it? Three instruments used by Department workers according to Volume 7 policy:

Safety Assessment Risk Assessment North Carolina Family Assessment Scale (NCFAS and NCFAS-R)

Who completes it? Safety Assessment: Typically, the intake worker Risk Assessment: Either the intake worker or the ongoing work NCFAS: Ongoing worker

When is it completed? Safety Assessment: Completed within 7 days of contact, documented in Trails

within 30 days of referral. Required in all cases, except abandonment. Risk Assessment: Also in Trails within 30 days of referral. Used in cases with

goals of remain home or return home. Must be completed prior to return home or when closing the case.

NCFAS: Must be done within 30 days of assignment. Used with return home or remain home goals. The NCFAS-R (reunification), is completed prior to reunification

How can we use it? Treatment plan development, Reunification, Increasing services

Page 7: Defending Parents

Court ActionCourt Action

Governing Law: Colorado Children’s Code (C.R.S. Title 19).

First Hearing: Shelter Hearing, Temporary Protective Custody Hearing, Preliminary Protective Proceeding Purpose

This first hearing is to review the ex parte court hold, or a police hold, if the child was removed, or any ex parte temporary protective orders that the court issued.

Timing The hearing happens within 72 hours, excluding

weekends and holidays. Police holds must be reviewed within 48 hours.

Page 8: Defending Parents

AdjudicationAdjudication

Purpose: Court will determine whether to sustain or dismiss the petition. If the petition is sustained, then the child is adjudicated

dependent or neglected.

Timing: Adjudicatory hearings must be held as quickly as possible, and

not later than 90 days after the petition has been served. If any child on the petition is younger than six, then the adjudicatory hearing must be held within 60 days unless the court finds that it is in the child’s best interest to grant a delay.

Evidence: At the Adjudicatory hearing , the Department must prove by a

preponderance of the evidence the allegations in the petition. If it is an ICWA  case, then the standard of proof is clear and convincing evidence as to certain findings the court must make, including expert testimony.

Page 9: Defending Parents

Treatment Plan/ Dispositional Treatment Plan/ Dispositional HearingHearing Purpose:

The purpose is to determine a treatment plan that is reasonable, intended to address the condition or conditions that led to the adjudication, and to address every party.

Timing: The dispositional hearing, also called the treatment plan

hearing, can either follow immediately after the finding of adjudication or it can be continued for up to 30 days after adjudication in an expedited permanency planning (EPP) case (45 in a regular case).

Evidence: The evidence at the treatment plan hearing is the treatment

plan written by the caseworker. NCFAS

Page 10: Defending Parents

Expedited Permanency Expedited Permanency PlanningPlanning Any child on petition under the age of 6 Faster timelines

For example, the adjudicatory hearing has to happen within 60 days of service of the petition. The dispositional, or treatment plan hearing, has to happen within 30 days. In addition, the child has to be in a permanent placement within 12 months of removal from his or her home

Page 11: Defending Parents

Permanency Planning Permanency Planning HearingHearing Purpose:

At the permanency planning hearing, the court must choose one of 4 permanent options for the child: reunification with the parents, adoption, allocation of parental rights (APR)/guardianship, or other planned permanency living arrangement .

Timing: The permanency hearing typically happens about 90 days after

the dispositional hearing in all cases, but is only required this quickly in EPP cases. In all other cases the court is required to have a permanency hearing within 12 months of when the child entered foster care.

In cases where the disposition is that no treatment plan can be devised, then a permanency hearing must be held within 30 days. No treatment plan is appropriate in certain serious cases, such as repeated child sexual abuse.

Page 12: Defending Parents

Termination of Parental Termination of Parental RightsRights C.R.S. § 19-3-602  Purpose:

The Department or the GAL may also choose to file a motion to terminate the parent-child legal relationship and free the child for adoption.

Timing: This requires a separate motion and a separate hearing within

120 days, unless good cause is shown. Evidence:

The Department has the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, the cause of action for termination.

In an ICWA case, the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt that continued custody of the child by the parent is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child, proven by expert testimony.

Page 13: Defending Parents

Child Welfare System Child Welfare System StakeholdersStakeholders Department

Caseworkers, supervisors, managers General v. Specialized:

Each county will organize its workers in its own way, but most counties separate workers into areas of specialty, such as an adolescent unit, an investigation or intake unit, an ongoing unit, etc. Some counties, however, prefer to have all workers do all aspects of case management – so the workers are generalists.  

Training: Caseworkers complete 40 hours of training up front and then 40 hours per year.

Counsel for the Department Who They Are:

The larger Departments are represented by the County Attorney’s office. In smaller counties the legal work for the Department is often handled by a

contracted prosecutor.

Role: Agency Model: the attorney represents the Department Prosecutorial Model: the attorney represents the State or the People

Training: Twice a year; not public.

Page 14: Defending Parents

Children’s AdvocatesChildren’s Advocates GALS

Who They Are: Guardians ad litem (GAL) are lawyers appointed to represent what is in the

best interests of the child client who is the subject of a dependency and neglect (D&N).

Further definition of the GAL role coming in People v. Gabriesheski. Role:

Represent child’s best interests Training:

Must be experienced practitioner, ongoing training offered by OCR

CASA Who They Are:

Court appointed special advocates, or CASAs, are lay volunteers generally appointed to work with the children.

Role: Advocate for the child’s best interests

Training: Varies, but typically 40 hours before assigned to first case

Page 15: Defending Parents

Judicial Officers and Court Judicial Officers and Court StaffStaff Who They Are:

District court judges, magistrates, law clerks and division clerks, family court facilitators Some districts have judicial officers dedicated to the juvenile

law docket, while others, particularly in smaller jurisdictions, have judges with general civil dockets.

Role: Many of the larger courthouses use magistrates for most types of

hearings, except for jury trials and termination hearings. Family court facilitators play different roles. In some jurisdictions

they are used administratively while in others they mediate dependency and neglect cases as well.

Training: Judicial conferences and annual trainings Colorado Dependency and Neglect Judicial Institute

Page 16: Defending Parents

Professional CultureProfessional Culture

Collaboration: CIP, Best Practice Teams, Lead Judges Court Improvement Program (CIP) – federally funded

grant administered by State Judicial to improve outcomes for children, youth and families through collaboration of child welfare stakeholders at the local and state levels.

Best Practice Court Teams (BPC Teams) – Each judicial district in Colorado has a multi-disciplinary, judge-led team of local child welfare stakeholders who effect systems change in dependency and child welfare arenas.

Lead Judges – are dependency court judicial officers appointed in each judicial district by the Chief Judge. It is the Lead Judge who organizes and convenes BPC Teams.

Page 17: Defending Parents

Professional Culture, continued Institutional players Informality Low pay, high caseloads Confidentiality – protecting privacy or

creating lack of accountability?

Page 18: Defending Parents

Colorado Practice StandardsColorado Practice Standards

Colorado Standards for RPC Training Competent Representation Communication Documentation

Page 19: Defending Parents

Colorado Practice StandardsColorado Practice Standards, continued

Investigation: facts and timing Agency Advocacy: services and placements Client Location: keeping track Cultural Awareness: impact on case

success Appeals

Page 20: Defending Parents

Client LocationClient Location

Several sources: Federal parent locator service:

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/newhire (accessible by DSS)

Colorado Corrections: www.doc.state.co.us/oss. Need DOB or DOC number.

Criminal background checks: www.cbirecords.com

To find any person: www.switchboard.com ICON access at:

https://www.jbits.courts.state.co.us/pas/pubaccess/index.cfm 

Page 21: Defending Parents

General Principle:

Understand and protect the parent’s rights to information and decision-making while the child is in foster care.  

ABA Standards of Practice forAttorneys Representing Parents

Page 22: Defending Parents

Relationship With The Relationship With The Client:Client: Advocate for the client’s goals and empower the

client to direct the representation and make informed decisions based on thorough counsel.

  Provide the client with contact information in

writing and establish a message system that allows regular attorney-client contact.

  

Page 23: Defending Parents

Relationship With ClientRelationship With Client, continued

Meet and communicate regularly with the client well before court proceedings. Counsel the client about all legal matters related to the case, including specific allegations against the client, the service plan, the client’s rights in the pending proceeding, any orders entered against the client and the potential consequences of failing to obey court orders or cooperate with service plans.

Page 24: Defending Parents

Relationship With ClientRelationship With Client, continued Work with the client to develop a case timeline and tickler

system.

Act in a culturally competent manner and with regard to the socioeconomic position of the parent throughout all aspects of representation.

Take diligent steps to locate and communicate with a missing parent and decide representation strategies based on that communication.

Be aware of the unique issues an incarcerated parent faces and provide competent representation to the incarcerated client.

Be aware of the client’s mental health status and be prepared to assess whether the parent can assist with the case.

Page 25: Defending Parents

Investigation and DiscoveryInvestigation and Discovery

Conduct a thorough and independent investigation at every stage of the proceeding.

Review the child welfare agency case file. Obtain all necessary documents, including copies

of all pleadings and relevant notices filed by other parties, and information from the caseworker and providers.

Page 26: Defending Parents

Court AdvocacyCourt Advocacy

Develop a case theory and strategy to follow at hearings and negotiations.

Engage in case planning and advocate for appropriate social services using a multidisciplinary approach to representation when available.

Aggressively advocate for regular visitation in a family-friendly setting. We will talk about visitation throughout the training.

Identify, locate, and prepare all witnesses. Identify, secure, prepare, and qualify expert

witness when needed. When permissible, interview opposing counsel’s experts.

Page 27: Defending Parents

Court AdvocacyCourt Advocacy, continued

Actively participate in jury selection and drafting jury instructions.

Request closed proceedings in appropriate cases.

Request the opportunity to make opening and closing arguments.

Prepare proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and orders when they will be used in the court’s decision or may otherwise benefit the client.

 

Page 28: Defending Parents

Post Hearings/Appeals:Post Hearings/Appeals:

Review Make a record What is an appealable order?

Adjudication not appealable until disposition: C.R.S. Section 19-1-1-9(2)(c), People in the Interest of E.A., 638 P.2d 278 (Colo. 1981).

Discuss options for appeal with client File: C.A.R 3.4 requires Notice of Appeal and Designation of

Record be prepared and signed by trial counsel. Notice of Appeal must be signed by client or specifically

authorized. Appeal must be filed even without regard to the

likelihood of success on appeal

Page 29: Defending Parents

National SupportNational Support

The National Project to Improve Representation for

Parents Involved in the Child Welfare System A collaboration between the American Bar Association

Center on Children and the Law, Casey Family Programs, the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Child Welfare Fund, and the Steering Committee for the National Parents’ Counsel Organization.

www.abanet.org/ child/parentrepresentation National Listserv: [email protected]

Page 30: Defending Parents

MissionMission

To strengthen representation of parents in the child

welfare system through: training and technical assistance for parents’

attorneys, courts and legislators; networking opportunities --a listserv and national

conference focused on parent representation; providing resources to improve parent

representation; and supporting system reforms that ensure parents

and their attorneys are given a voice in the child welfare system.

Page 31: Defending Parents

child/parent representation

www.abanet.org/

Page 32: Defending Parents

Parent SupportParent Support

Parent advocates and mentors: National Coalition for Parent Advocacy in Child Protective Services: http://www.parentadvocacy.org

RISE magazine: www.risemagazine.org

Others in the community

Page 33: Defending Parents

Colorado System ReformColorado System Reform

Colorado Court Improvement Project Respondent Parent Task Force 2005-2007: Statewide Needs Assessment, April 2007 (online at http://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/File/Court_ Probation/Supreme_Court/Committees/Court_ Improvement/CORPCFinalNeedAssesExeSum.pdf)

Listserv: contact Bill Delisio at [email protected]

Page 34: Defending Parents

Consider Self Evaluation

Can lead to improved practice Greater job satisfaction Helps identify system barriers

Page 35: Defending Parents

How to Do a Self Evaluation

Elizabeth Thornton, “Tools for Evaluating Parent Attorney Performance,” Peer, judge, and client surveys; Activity logs focused on compliance with

practice standards; and Data review and comparisons of case

outcomes for your clients.

Page 36: Defending Parents

Overview of the Child Welfare Overview of the Child Welfare SystemSystem

ReviewQuestions and Answers