defining a governance model

59
Defining a Governance Model Intranets, Extranets & Websites 1 Toronto | Ottawa | Calgary | Regina | New York

Upload: nlcmarketing

Post on 02-Jul-2015

302 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Defining a Governance Model

Defining a Governance Model

Intranets, Extranets & Websites

1Toronto | Ottawa | Calgary | Regina | New York

Page 2: Defining a Governance Model

What is (CMS) governance?

2

Ask 20 people, get 20 answers.

1. A set of policies, roles, responsibilities and

processes to guide, direct and control how

your CMS is used to accomplish business

goals

2. A set of workflows and permissions implemented in

your CMS

3. The authoritative administrative structures that set

policy and standards for Web product management

Page 3: Defining a Governance Model

Don‟t forget why you implemented a CMS (and a website) in the first place!

Common reasons

1. To remove the IT bottleneck

2. To empower distributed content authors to

manage their own content

3. To enforce standards across your web properties

4. To automate processes for greater efficiency

5. To manage web content as a proper digital asset

and your website as a proper channel

3

Page 4: Defining a Governance Model

4

A thought experiment

Page 5: Defining a Governance Model

5

The Problem

Two different departments

have critical events

happening at the same time

and both want to be on the

homepage. There‟s not

enough room.

Who decides what goes on

the homepage?

Page 6: Defining a Governance Model

6

The Problem

You are considering changing

the way you label navigation

on your website.

Who is responsible for

looking at search analytics to

determine the vocabulary

your visitors actually use?

Page 7: Defining a Governance Model

7

The Problem

There is a clear business case

for a new faceted search

engine.

It will benefit almost every

group that produces content in

the organization.

What budget does it come

from? Who authorizes the

purchase?

Page 8: Defining a Governance Model

8

The Problem

The number of online

registrations has dropped by

25%. (Increasing

registrations is a key

objective of the website)

Who reacts?

Page 9: Defining a Governance Model

9

The Problem

A series of untrue, near-

slanderous blog posts are

made about your

organization and retweeted.

Who is responsible for

knowing this is happening?

Who decides how to

respond?

Page 10: Defining a Governance Model

What can we do?

10

Today, I hope to …

1. Draw a bigger circle around WCM governance

that goes beyond workflows and permissions

2. Provide you some helpful examples for aligning

the right people in the right place(s)

3. Offer some suggestions for the tough questions

Page 11: Defining a Governance Model

What happens if you don‟t put “good” governance in place?

• Messy, uncontrolled growth of content

• Organizational conflict

• Poor adoption and resistance to change

• Operational inefficiency

• Loss of credibility

• Risk of litigation

11

Page 12: Defining a Governance Model

Typical governance FAIL

• No senior champion

• Project is an IT-driven initiative

• Web team has limited budget and power

• No consideration for change management

• No plan or vision

• Assuming the technology will handle everything

• Greatest barrier to success = politics

• Greatest key to success = senior champion12

Page 13: Defining a Governance Model

Recap: what types of governance models exist?

• Decentralized (common in larger orgs)

• No single owner

• Driven by policies and guidelines

• Organic growth, sometimes leading to site sprawl

• Centralized (common in smaller orgs)

• Single owner/department

• Bureaucratic

• Highly controlled

13

Page 14: Defining a Governance Model

What types of governance models exist?

• Collaborative

• Executive champion

• Steering committee / council

• Decentralized content ownership

• Centralized platform

14

Page 15: Defining a Governance Model

15

But first…consider the complexities of the modern corporate website

Page 16: Defining a Governance Model

16

Base web content

Global taxonomy

Analytics and key performance indicators

Extranet functionality/social and user-generated content

Content sharing/integration with business systems (CRM, DAM, intranet)

“Web engagement management” – personalization, marketing automation, content profiling

Multiple channels (RSS, mobile)

Content and website lifecycle

Page 17: Defining a Governance Model

17

A collaborative WCM governance model for a large, distributed organization

Executive sponsor

Web steering team

Web team

Content authors

Page 18: Defining a Governance Model

The executive team/sponsor

Roles and responsibilities

1. Defining the overall strategy and priorities for the

website.

2. Allocation of funds

3. Ensuring that the right people are in the right positions

for online success

4. Reviewing and approving brand guidelines

5. Sets high-level policies

6. Acting as a the final authority for resolving conflicts

18

Page 19: Defining a Governance Model

A committed sponsor

• Doesn‟t just sign the cheque

• Takes responsibility for the project

• Wants to see the project succeed

• Is fully informed and educated on the project

19

Page 20: Defining a Governance Model

Some tips

• The business case should sell itself

• Education is key

• Provide the sponsor with ongoing status and goal

updates

• Do not hide shortcomings

• Consider quick wins to show immediate value and

maintain support

20

Page 21: Defining a Governance Model

The web steering team

Advice:the Internet Strategy Forum (2009)

1. The role of internal online strategist has shifted:

more than 60% of such positions are within two

levels of the CEO

2. The importance of the internet is growing in

many organizations – the introduction of senior

executive roles responsible for online execution

3. Recommendation: Create a separate Internet

strategic management function (do not force into

IT or marketing as they exist)

21

Page 22: Defining a Governance Model

The web steering team

Roles and responsibilities

1. Resolve questions of conflicting priorities based on

objectives set by ES

2. Brand enforcement - has power to deny proposals

3. Define internal and external content; create policies

on content lifecycle

4. Coordinate activities, reducing duplication

5. Decide how best to address new regulatory or

legislative requirements

6. Review metrics and using these to drive decisions

22

Page 23: Defining a Governance Model

The web steering team

Committees and membership

1. Break down role into multiple committees

reporting to the WST

2. Members may be VP-level or middle

management – ensure a decisions are made in an

effective and timely manner

3. Members should represent a healthy cross-

section of departments with an interest in the

website >> recall the website layer cake!

23

Page 24: Defining a Governance Model

The web team

Roles and responsibilities

1. Undertake ongoing analysis of user behaviour and report on this behaviour to ES and WST

2. Content approval, workflow and permissions decisions

3. Provide training and support to content creators

4. Monitor and tune the site search engine

5. Implement search engine optimization tactics

6. Staying on the “cutting edge” as appropriate

24

Page 25: Defining a Governance Model

Knowledge half-life

• The half life of knowledge in a given field is how

long it takes for half of industry current expertise

to become irrelevant or incorrect

25

Industry Knowledge Half-Life

Mechanical Engineering 20 years

Medicine 10 years

Traditional Marketing 7 years

Internet Marketing 3 years

Social Media Marketing 1 year or less

Page 26: Defining a Governance Model

Content contributors

Roles and responsibilities

1. Creation and editing of content

2. Entry of content into WCM

26

Page 27: Defining a Governance Model

Competencies for online success

27

Technology

Strategy & Direction

Social Media

Outreach

Content Creation

Education &

Mentoring

Page 28: Defining a Governance Model

Map competency tasks to teams

28

Web team Web Steering Team

ExecutiveTeam

External expertise

Technology

Support of daily operations

X

New technology deployments

X

Business analysis X

Page 29: Defining a Governance Model

29

Content governance: Where the rubber hits the road

Page 30: Defining a Governance Model

Effective CMS content governance

• Flows naturally from people alignment

• Provides the right balance of guidance and

empowerment

• Is key to a successful CMS deployment

30

Page 31: Defining a Governance Model

Key ingredients: your content governance plan

• Owned by web team.

• Build an authorship model

This determines who will be allowed to create and edit content for

each area of the site, including tagging, personalization and forms

• Create an authorization and permission model

Documents the types of users and their access privileges – including

those administering ongoing business functions such as A|B testing

and analytics reporting. Can be as granular as text editor buttons.

31

Page 32: Defining a Governance Model

More ingredients

• Develop a workflow model

Content approval prior to publishing, including user-generated and

social content.

• Publication strategy

How frequently content will be published to the live web server, how

exceptions will be handled and who can accelerate publishing

• Define an archiving strategy

When and how is content removed from the site? What freshness

checks can be put in place?

32

Page 34: Defining a Governance Model

Extranet user management

• An entirely separate set of permissions and workflows

• Often requires business input:

• channel relationships (clients, partners, constituents)

• business system/portal integration (e-commerce, account management

systems)

• Ensure your web steering team has adequate

representation from these stakeholders

• Ensure your web team has the right skillsets and

enough resources to manage these elements

34

Page 35: Defining a Governance Model

Extranet community

• May or may not allow subsite/feature provisioning

• Communities, blogs, forums

• If so, lean towards an intranet governance model

• Add a community manager or curator to your web

team.

• They will need extra support if user-generated content is to be

closely monitored.

35

Page 36: Defining a Governance Model

Advice from the trenches

Page 37: Defining a Governance Model

Advice from the trenches

• Align your people BEFORE your implementation

starts!

• Before technical planning

• Before information architecture

• Maybe even before web strategy

• If you‟ve already got a mess on your hands…

• All the more reason. Decision-making structure should be

crystal clear when wading through a mess.

37

Page 38: Defining a Governance Model

Advice from the trenches

• Prepare people for governance sessions

• Use your information architecture

• When in doubt, keep it simple.

• Educate people on CMS concepts:

workflow, permissions, publication and other content-related

processes.

38

Page 39: Defining a Governance Model

The Colouring Exercise

Homepage

About Us

History

Philosophy

Careers

Products

Widget

Doodad

Thingy

Press Room

Press Releases

Videos

39

Page 40: Defining a Governance Model

Children (and adults) like boundaries

• Give people clear guidelines

• Alignment with brand and company messaging

• What's considered inappropriate and what's okay to share

• How people read and scan web content

• Visual design guidance – restricting # words

• Search engine optimization principles

• Your CMS can help you here…

• Build in help text and guidelines on every field

40

Page 41: Defining a Governance Model

Supplementary skillsets can help too…

• The web is a distinct and unique medium –

consider adding a content strategist to your

team

• What is a content strategist?

• Rachel Lovinger: A content strategist is a [role] with specialized

focus on using words and data to create unambiguous content

that supports meaningful, interactive experiences.

• Can play an important role in content lifecycle

41

Page 42: Defining a Governance Model

How to encourage adoption

• Engage evangelists and spread the word

• Training – people fear the unknown

• Support structure

• Involve users as early as possible

• People will change if the change is worthwhile

• Restrict as much as possible, within reason

42

Page 43: Defining a Governance Model

Act it out

43

Workshop – 20 minutes duration

1. Select some small object to represent a piece of

content

2. Choose individuals or teams to represent ownership

within the website

3. Act out a process from start to end, including all

approval steps and exchanges of information

4. Repeat until your point is made

Page 44: Defining a Governance Model

Sketch it out

Visual is powerful

1. Creating simple pictures is an incredibly powerful

way to discover ideas and solve problems

2. Get everyone up to the whiteboard!

3. Very effective in sessions where team members

sketched out their ideal homepage

44Credit: Dan Roam

Page 45: Defining a Governance Model

Use some persuasion

45

Human Behaviour 101

1. One of the best ways to get people to do

something? Turn it into a game and add some

competition. We just can‟t resist.

2. 50 insights into human behaviour that can be

applied not only to web design, but also to

business processes.

3. Getmentalnotes.com (Stephen Anderson)

Page 46: Defining a Governance Model

The $100 Game

46

Activity: Around 20 minutes

1. You are provided with a list of priorities and $100

to „spend‟.

2. Distribute the money across the priorities

according to how important those features.

3. Explain and defend why you have divided your

money in this way.

Page 47: Defining a Governance Model

47

The Problem

You are considering changing

the way you label navigation

on your website.

Who is responsible for

looking at search analytics to

determine the vocabulary

your visitors actually use?

Page 48: Defining a Governance Model

A good answer

• The web team is responsible for monitoring

analytics and reporting findings to the web

steering team.

48

Page 49: Defining a Governance Model

49

The Problem

Two different departments

have critical events

happening at the same time

and both want to be on the

homepage. There‟s not

enough room.

Who makes this decision?

Page 50: Defining a Governance Model

A good answer

• The web steering team makes the call.

• Does not need to be escalated to the executive team unless

absolutely necessary

50

Page 51: Defining a Governance Model

51

The Problem

There is a clear business case

for a new faceted search

engine.

It will benefit almost every

group that produces content in

the organization.

What budget does it come

from? Who authorizes the

purchase?

Page 52: Defining a Governance Model

A good answer

• The executive team makes the funding decision

and allocates budget as required.

52

Page 53: Defining a Governance Model

53

The Problem

The number of online

registrations has dropped by

25%. (Increasing

registrations is a key

objective of the website)

Who reacts?

Page 54: Defining a Governance Model

A good answer

• The executive team pays attention to this and

imposes an appropriate strategy and reaction

chain through the steering and web teams

54

Page 55: Defining a Governance Model

55

The Problem

A series of untrue, near-

slanderous blog posts are

made about your

organization and retweeted.

Who is responsible for

knowing this is happening?

Who decides how to

respond?

Page 56: Defining a Governance Model

A good answer

• Marketing and/or communications might take

responsibility for this

• Social media monitoring

56

Page 57: Defining a Governance Model

Eva

lua

tio

n

Ne

two

rk P

ipe

lin

e

MonitoringUpon discovering a comment

about the initiative, first

determine the channel:

Social Media Response MatrixCreated by non~linear creations, December 2009

Active Channels-Twitter

- YouTube

- Flickr

Neutral Channels- Blogs

- Open Forums

Closed Channels

- Facebook

- MySpace

-Closed Forums

Is this person in your

network?

(Twitter follower,

YouTube subscriber,

Flickr contact)

Check their stream. Do

they post a lot about

related topics?

Invite them to connect

Y

N

Y

N

Ac

tion

s

Monitor

(See Notes)

Is comment positive / neutral?

Let Stand

(See Notes)

Concur, Add or Thank

(See Notes)

Fix

(See Notes)

Reach Out

(See Notes)

Is it something you can

respond to?

Is the comment off-topic for them

or clearly just meant to

antagonize?

Is it a rage piece? Are they venting

or ranting without a cohesive

argument?

Is there a factual error? Is the

comment misguided but rational?

Does the commenter have a

specific concern or issue that can

be addressed?

Is it something you can otherwise

respond to?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

Page 58: Defining a Governance Model

Takeaways

• Invest in people alignment

• It’s worth the time, effort and expense

• There are good and effective ways to structure everyone and

everything for online success

• Form teams spanning traditional silos

• IT should not drive CMS initiatives

• Ensure your governance model spans the website

“layer cake”

• There is much more than just web content to consider58

Page 59: Defining a Governance Model

Add NLC closing slides

59