deformation behaviour of asymmetrically f ti c l d m t lli...
TRANSCRIPT
Deformation Behaviour of Asymmetrically Deformation Behaviour of Asymmetrically F ti C l d M t lli M t i lF ti C l d M t lli M t i lFatigue Cycled Metallic MaterialsFatigue Cycled Metallic Materials
by
Krishna DuttaNational Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India
Krishna Dutta
and
K. K. Ray and
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
BrassBrassIF IF SteelSteel
Al alloyAl alloyAl alloyAl alloy
For all the abovementioned applications oneFor all the abovementioned applications one damage parameter is most important-
FATIGUEFATIGUEFATIGUEFATIGUE.
Fatigue damage may happen by SYMMETRIC or ASYMMETRIC type ofSYMMETRIC or ASYMMETRIC type of loading.
+ σ σm = 0σmax
iσ
t-
εσmin
Symmetric Loading
σ+
σmax = - σmin
σ
σ
σmax
Asymmetric σm ≠ 0
εσ t-
σmax ≠ - σmin
σminLoading
max min
εmaxεmin Max stress
σmax
tress
,σεmaxεmin σmax= Max. stress
σmin = Min. stress
σm = Mean stress
St
σa
m
σa = Stressamplitude
εr = Ratcheting εr
σm
r gstrain
Plastic Strain, εP
( )/σminεr = (εmax + εmin )/ 2
σ = (σ - σ i )/ 2σ = (σ + σ i )/ 2 σa = (σmax - σmin )/ 2σm = (σmax + σmin )/ 2
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
Eff t f t t lit d i tEffect of mean stress, stress amplitude, maximum stressand stress ratio on the nature of strain accumulation hasbeen studied by a few earlier investigators.y g
Year Author Control ParameterMaterial Test Parameters
1949 Lazan Copper Effect of Temperature1990 Yoshida SUS304 stainless steel Effect of Stress ratio1996 Xia et al ASTM A 516 Gr 70 steel Effect of mean stress1996 Xia et al. ASTM A 516 Gr. 70 steel Effect of mean stress.2004 Feaugas and
Gaudin316L Stainless steel Effect of maximum
stress.2005 Kang et al 25 CDV 4 11 steel and SS304 Effect of mean stress2005 Kang et al. 25 CDV 4.11 steel and SS304
stainless steelEffect of mean stress and stress amplitude.
2005 Chen and Hui Polymer General2009 Lim Copper alloy General2009 Lim Copper alloy General
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
SystematicSystematic informationinformation onon subsub--structurestructure formationformation duedue toto thetheaccumulationaccumulation ofof strainstrain underunderdifferentdifferent testtest conditionsconditions areare lackinglacking..
InformationInformation relatedrelated toto variationsvariations ininInformationInformation relatedrelated toto variationsvariations inindeformationdeformation behaviourbehaviour duedue totoaccumulationaccumulation ofof plasticplastic strainstrainareare lackinglacking..
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
gg
ToTo developdevelop anan understandingunderstanding aboutabout thethenaturenature ofof strainstrain accumulationaccumulation underunderasymmetricalasymmetrical cycliccyclic loadingloading withwith respectrespecttoto attendantattendant variationsvariations inin substructuresubstructureformationformation..
ToTo studystudy thethe eeffectffect ofof strainstrain accumulationaccumulationonon possiblepossible variationsvariations inin deformationdeformationbehaviourbehaviour ofof thethe investigatedinvestigated materialsmaterials..
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
Aluminum alloy
Interstitial free (IF) steel
α - brass
Materials ElementsMaterials ElementsC Mn Si P S Cr Ni Mg N Al Fe
Aluminumalloy*
– 0.04 0.610.61 – – 0.001 – 0.50 – Bal. 0.12alloy*
IF Steel** 0.0030.003 0.13 0.009 0.012 0.009 – 0.01 – 0.0034 0.06 Bal.
CuCu Zn Ni Sn
* Ti – 0.012, Zn – 0.006, Cu – 0.004, V – 0.005, ** Ti – 0.052, Nb – 0.001, Mo – 0.001, V – 0.001
CuCu Zn Ni Sn
α- brass 68.8268.82 30.6430.64 0.013 trace
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
50 μm 200 μmAl alloy IF steel
Material Grain size (μm)
Aluminum alloy 33 ± 3.6
200 μmα brass
IF Steel 64 ± 1.3
α - Brass 19 ± 2.4
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
200 μmα - brass
250250
150
200
250
ress
, MPa
150
200
250es
s, M
Pa
50
100
150
ngin
eeri
ng st
r
Material: IF Steel50
100
ng
inee
ring
stre
0 10 20 30 40 500
En
Engineering strain, %
Material: IF Steel
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
M ate ria l: A l a llo y
E n gin eerin g stra in %
En
3 0 0
3 5 0
Strain rate: 1.0x10-4s-1
Temperature: 300 K1 5 0
2 0 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
ng s
tres
s, M
Pa
Temperature: 300 KGauge length: 30 mmGauge diameter: 6 mm
0
5 0
1 0 0
1 5 0
Engi
neer
i
M a te r ia l: B ra s s
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0
E n g in e e r in g s tra in , %
MaterialMaterial YS (MPa)
UTS (MPa)
%eu %et n K (MPa)
Al llAl ll 140 220 6 8 18 2 0 10 309Al alloyAl alloy 140 220 6.8 18.2 0.10 309
IF SteelIF Steel 94 238 34.6 45.2 0.40 537IF SteelIF Steel 94 238 34.6 45.2 0.40 537
αα -- BrassBrass 103 323 88.7 96.7 0.49 608
n = strain hardening exponent, K = strength coefficient
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
sφ 7
Stre
ss
Time
σa
σm110
φ
1335 35
φ11
Time
σσmm >> 00Asymmetric
35 35
Specimen design
/
σσmm 00cycling
Waveform: Triangular Stress rate: 50 MPa/s
σ ≠ σσmax ≠ - σmin7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno,
Czech Republic
MaterialMaterial σσmm (MPa)(MPa) σσaa (MPa)(MPa)10 130 140 150
Aluminium
10 130,140,150
20 130,140,150
30 130 140 15030 130,140,150
IF Steel
10 130,140,150
20 130,140,150, ,
30 130,140,150
10 90, 110, 130
α - brass 30 90, 110, 130
50 90, 110, 130 , ,
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
100
150 σmax = 0.62σUTS IF Steel
20
40
60
80
100M
Pa Aluminium alloyσmax = 0.64 σUTS
50
100
150 σmax = 0.62σUTS IF Steel
, MPa
50
100
MPa
-60
-40
-20
0
20
Stre
ss,
-100
-50
0
Stre
ss,
0
ress
, M-0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15-80
Strain, %0 1 2 3 4
-150
Strain, %
200 σmax = 0.6 σUTS
Brass
-100
-50Str
50
100
150
ess,
MPa
StrainStrain accumulationaccumulationisis insignificantinsignificant inin thetheAlAl alloyalloy upup toto thethe
0 1 2 3 4-150
100
0.0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.2
-100
-50
0
Stre
AlAl alloyalloy upup toto thetheinvestigatedinvestigated numbernumberofof cyclescycles..
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
Strain, %0.0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.2
Strain, %
6 σm = 10MPa, σa = 130 MPa
0 3
0.4
0.5
stra
in, %
σa=130 MPa σa=140 MPa σa=150 MPa
σm= 20 MPa
4
6 σm 10MPa, σa 130 MPa
σm = 10MPa, σa = 140 MPa
σm = 10MPa, σa = 150 MPa
g st
rain
, %
0.1
0.2
0.3
Rat
chet
ing
2
R
atch
etin
g
0 20 40 60 80 100Number of cycles
0 20 40 60 80 1000
Number of cycles
2
3
4
g st
rain
, %Al alloyAl alloy IF SteelIF Steel
0
1
2
σm = 50MPa, σa = 90 MPa σm = 50MPa, σa = 110 MPa σm = 50MPa, σa = 130 MPaR
atch
etin
g
BrassBrass
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
0 20 40 60 80 1000
Number of cycles
σa = 130 MPa σa = 150 MPa
Strain accumulation increases due to increased dislocation densityincreased dislocation density
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
σa = 130 MPaσa = 90 MPa
Strain accumulation increases due to increased dislocation densityincreased dislocation density
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic
300
Pa Ratcheted
200
250tr
ess,
MP
100
150
erin
g St Undeformed
0
50 σm = 10MPa, σa = 130 MPa σm = 10MPa, σa = 140 MPa σm = 10MPa, σa = 150 MPaEn
gine
e
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160 m a
Engineering Strain, %
Loading condition*
Tensile strength (MPa)
% Increase
in strength
% Uniform
elongation
% Decrease in uniform elongation
%Total elongation
%Decrease in total
elongation
Unratcheted 220 - 6.8 - 18.2 -
M10A130 261 18.6 4.6 32.4 13.9 23.6
M10A140 263 19 5 3 7 45 6 16 1 11 5M10A140 263 19.5 3.7 45.6 16.1 11.5
M10A150 268 21.8 5.0 26.5 15.3 15.9
M20A130 266 20.9 4.5 33.8 15.9 12.6
M20A140 262 19.1 3.5 48.5 16.2 11.0
M20A150 263 19.5 4.5 33.8 15.5 14.8
M30A130 268 21.8 3.9 42.6 16.9 7.1
M30A140 261 18.6 3.7 45.6 16.1 11.5
M30A150 270270 22 722 7 4 7 30 9 15 1 17 0M30A150 270270 22.722.7 4.7 30.9 15.1 17.0
280280
200
240
, MPa
200
240
280
, MPa
120
160
Stre
ngth
YSUTS 120
160
200
Stre
ngth
YSUTS
80
120
Mean stress MPa302010
UTS
Stress amplitude: 140 MPa
Un-ratcheted80
120
Stress amplitude MPa150140130
UTS
Mean stress: 30 MPa
Un-ratcheted
Mean stress, MPa Stress amplitude, MPa
60 60
50
60
n, M
Pa 50
60
n, M
Pa
30
40
Elon
gatio
n
% uniformation elongation % total elongation 30
40
Elon
gatio
n
% uniformation elongation % total elongation
Mean stress: 30 MPa
20
30
302010
%E
Stress amplitude: 140 MPa
Un-ratcheted
20
150140130%
EUn-ratcheted
Mean stress, MPa Stress amplitude, MPa
200 N = 100N = 80N = 2 N = 6 N = 48N = 24
100
150
Pa
0
50
ress
, M
-100
-50
20 M P 140 M P
St
1 .5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5-150 σ m = 20 M Pa, σ a = 140 M Pa
Strain, %,
Accumulation of ratcheting strain (εr) increases with increasingstress amplitude (σa) at any constant mean stress (σm) in all theinvestigated materials. The observed increase in straininvestigated materials. The observed increase in strainaccumulation can be qualitatively correlated with increaseddislocation density in the ratcheted samples.
Accumulation of ratcheting strain leads to improved yield andtensile strength of the investigated materials associated withreduction in their %uniform elongation, compared to that ofunratcheted samples. The increase in strength can be correlatedwith increased cyclic damage as well as cyclic hardening of thematerials.
On the other hand, %total elongation of the samples aregoverned by characteristic post-necking elongation dictated bythe substructural features of the ratcheted material.
7th International Conference on Materials Structure and Micromechanics of Fracture, MSMF 7, July 1 – 3, 2013, Brno, Czech Republic