degc budget analysis

15
=)).E'alu))(')) CKOCH :IKF?R( DK, YaL:8F 8H8FRLM &161' 002"c.43 :CMR:INH:CF 8HH? G8KC? F8HA8H 8LLCLM8H%@CL:8F 8H8FRLM &1/1' 002q/.45 @aL:8F 8H8FRLCL ;COCLCIH :fcXdTe 8 Rfle\ GleaVagTc:XekXi 0 PffWnTiW 8mXelX, LNakX0/5 ;Xkif(k, GaV_a\Te 25003 @)8Q, &1/1' 002q0451 BS/fca VV)k(jVTc7VcWX$if$$ ie6 lj MI6 AXfi\X DTVbjfe( Di,( JiXjaWXek ;Xkifak ?VfefdaV Aifnk_ :figfiTkafe ;8M?6 Cimae :ficXo( Di,( @ajVTc 8eTcojaj ;aiXVkfi EI))E GTo 4(0./1 @KIG6 K?6 0./1)0./2 9lW\Xk 8eTcojaj 8kkTV_XWaj fli UlW\Xk TeTcojaj iX\TiWae\ ofli WXgTikdXek%j UlW\Xk Yfi k_X lgVfdae\ 0./1)0./2 @ajVTcRXTi, JcXTjX UX giXgTiXW kf iXjgfeW kf k_X ajjlXj-hlXjkafej iTajXW ae fli TeTcojaj Wliae\ ofli jV_XWlcXW _XTiae\ fe /43217&017 (-& )'(, 16 (( .'' T,d, PX nflcW k_Xe TggiXVaTkX T niakkXe iXjgfejX kf k_X ajjlXj-hlXjkafej Tk ofli XTicaXjk VfemXeaXeVX jlUjXhlXek kf ofli UlW\Xk _XTiae\, JcXTjX YfinTiW T Vfgo fY ofli iXjgfejXj kf k_X :fleVac dXdUXij TeWk_X :ako :cXib%j IYYaVX, JcXTjX VfekTVklj aYofl _TmXTeo hlXjkafej iX\TiWae\ fli UlW\Xk TeTcojaj, M_Teb ofl Yfi ofli VffgXiTkafe aek_aj dTkkXi, 8kkTV_dXekj VV6 :fleVacdXdUXij :fleVac ;amajafej 8lWakfi AXeXiTc%jIYYaVX AcXe Ffe\( ;?A: :_aXY @aeTeVaTc IYYaVXi Eiajj 8eWiXnj( Jif\iTd GTeT\Xi DTVbGTikae(:_aXY @aeTeVaTc IYYaVXi :_Xioc Df_ejfe( @aeTeVX ;aiXVkfi 9iXek BTikpXcc(CekXiad9lW\Xk ;aiXVkfi @cfoWLkTecXo(;Xglko 9lW\Xk ;aiXVkfi KXeXX L_fik( GTeT\Xi CC)9lW\Xk 8WTd BfccaXi(GTofi%j IYYaVX .BI4.4N/1'/3 AfRZTeaCO\.\TdJBIGCDEB'DCB'CC: $&/3-RcP

Upload: ryan-felton

Post on 22-Nov-2015

55 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Detroit City Council Fiscal Analysis Division review of the DEGC's proposed budget for FY 2013.

TRANSCRIPT

  • =)).E'alu))('))CKOCH:IKF?R( DK,

    YaL:8F 8H8FRLM&161' 002"c.43

    :CMR:INH:CF 8HH? G8KC? F8HA8H8LLCLM8H%@CL:8F 8H8FRLM

    &1/1' 002q/.45@aL:8F 8H8FRLCL ;COCLCIH

    :fcXdTe 8 Rfle\ GleaVagTc:XekXi0 PffWnTiW 8mXelX, LNakX0/5

    ;Xkif(k, GaV_a\Te 25003@)8Q,&1/1' 002q0451

    BS/fca VV)k(jVTc7VcWX$if$$ie6 lj

    MI6 AXfi\X DTVbjfe( Di,( JiXjaWXek;Xkifak ?VfefdaV Aifnk_ :figfiTkafe

    ;8M?6

    Cimae:ficXo( Di,( @ajVTc8eTcojaj ;aiXVkfi EI))EGTo 4(0./1

    @KIG6

    K?6 0./1)0./2 9lW\Xk 8eTcojaj

    8kkTV_XWaj fli UlW\Xk TeTcojaj iX\TiWae\ ofli WXgTikdXek%jUlW\Xk Yfi k_X lgVfdae\0./1)0./2 @ajVTcRXTi,

    JcXTjX UX giXgTiXW kf iXjgfeW kf k_X ajjlXj-hlXjkafej iTajXW ae fli TeTcojaj Wliae\ofli jV_XWlcXW _XTiae\ fe /43217&017 (-& )'(, 16 (( .'' T,d, PX nflcW k_XeTggiXVaTkXT niakkXe iXjgfejX kf k_X ajjlXj-hlXjkafej Tk ofli XTicaXjk VfemXeaXeVXjlUjXhlXek kf ofli UlW\Xk _XTiae\, JcXTjX YfinTiW T Vfgo fY ofli iXjgfejXj kf k_X:fleVac dXdUXij TeWk_X :ako :cXib%j IYYaVX,

    JcXTjX VfekTVklj aYofl _TmXTeo hlXjkafej iX\TiWae\ fli UlW\Xk TeTcojaj,

    M_Teb ofl Yfi ofli VffgXiTkafe aek_aj dTkkXi,

    8kkTV_dXekj

    VV6 :fleVacdXdUXij:fleVac ;amajafej8lWakfi AXeXiTc%jIYYaVXAcXe Ffe\( ;?A: :_aXY@aeTeVaTcIYYaVXiEiajj 8eWiXnj( Jif\iTd GTeT\XiDTVbGTikae(:_aXY@aeTeVaTcIYYaVXi:_Xioc Df_ejfe( @aeTeVX;aiXVkfi9iXek BTikpXcc(CekXiad9lW\Xk ;aiXVkfi@cfoWLkTecXo(;Xglko 9lW\Xk ;aiXVkfiKXeXX L_fik( GTeT\Xi CC)9lW\Xk8WTd BfccaXi(GTofi%j IYYaVX

    .BI4.4N/1'/3 AfRZTeaCO\.\TdJBIGCDEB'DCB'CC: $&/3-RcP

  • Detroit Economic Growth CorporationlEconomic Development CorporationlDowntown Development Authority

    FY 2013-2014 Budget Analysis by the Fiscal Analysis Division

    Detroit Economic Growth Corporation (DEGC)

    The DEGC is a private nonprofit development organization of public, business, laborand community leaders established to assist business in expanding or locating inDetroit. The DEGC provides staff and other administrative services to the DowntownDevelopment Authority (DDA), Local Development Financing Authority (LDFA), theEconomic Development Corporation (EDC), and the Detroit Brownfield RedevelopmentAuthority (DBRA). These development entities do not contain any staff.

    The DEGC receives funding primarily from the City of Detroit through its Planning andDevelopment Department (POD), the DDA, the EDC and corporate contributions. TheDDA, LDFA, EDC and DBRA contributions to the DEGC's budget serve asreimbursement to the DEGC for staff services, office space, and operating expenses.

    In the proposed 2013-14 budget for POD, POD requested a contribution of $850,000 tothe DEGC, but the Mayor recommends a contribution of $700,000, a 17.6% reductionfrom POD's request (see Attachment I). The chart below shows the City's contributionsto the DEGC since 2007-08:

    City of Detroit's Contribution to the Detroit Economic Growth Corporationfrom Its Planning and Development Department

    Recom-mended

    FY FY FY FY FY FY FY2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

    Contri-butionAmount $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $850,000 $850,000 $700,000

    The DEGC feels the City's contribution helps the organization provide citywide proactivebusiness attraction and retention efforts, work on vital economic development projects,and continue to work with the POD during pre-development stages on City projects.

    The chart below shows the proposed 2013-2014 budget for the DEGC as compared tothe current year's budget. The DEGC desires a budget for next fiscal year that includesPOD's request of $850,000:

  • KUkUcjU

    9Yin 9dcigQSi;:9 9dcigQSi;:9 LjeeaUbUci::7 9dcigQSiE:?7 9dcigQSi:8K7 9dcigQSiIgYkQiULUSidgEUWQaKUQaadSQiYdcHiXUg 9dcigQSihBciUgUhiBcSdbULUgkYSU?UUh-HiXUgBcSdbU8jTWUi :UVYSYi

    MdiQaKUkUcjU

    ;meUchUh

    IUghdccUa9dcigQSi LUgkYSUhMgQkUa-FUUiYcWh-FQg_UiYcWKUcNNiYaYiYUhaachjgQcSUBciUgUhi;fjYebUciHiXUg

    MdiQa

    &/' &0':;@9

    :;@9 IgdedhUT?P 0./0)0./1 ?P 0./1)0./2

    8jTWUi 8jTWUi

    "63.(... "63.(...1..(... 1..(...63.(... 63.(...

    /(3..(... /(3..(.../03(... /03(...03.(... 03.(...1..(... 1..(...

    . 02.(...1.(... 1.(...3(... .

    13(... 1.(.... .

    "2(023(... "2(253(...

    &/ ')&0':YVVUgUcSU

    ".

    02.(...

    &3(...'

    &3(...'

    "01.(...

    9dbbUciKUVUgUcSUEUiiUg

    &7'&8'&9'&:'(#F&?'&@'&@/'&A'&B'

    &C'

    "1(12/(... "1(362(... "021(... &D'/41(... /3.(... &/1(...' &E'/.0(... /.0(... . &F'2.5(3.. 2.5(3.. . &G'

    . . . (YF//.(... //.(... . ($F/0/(3.. /0/(3.. . &J'

    "2(023(... "2(253(... "01.(...

    &7' 7eeQgUcian(iXU :;@9 lQcih iXU 9YinSdcigYRjiYdcid gUbQYciXU hQbU QhiXUSjggUci VYhSQanUQgYcdgTUgid egdkYTUQc QTUfjQiU aUkUadVUSdcdbYSTUkUadebUcihUgkYSUhQcT iQ_Udc Qcn bdgU VjcSiYdchVgdb iXU 9Yin,

    &8' KUegUhUcih ;:9%h gUYbRjghUbUci id :;@9 Vgdb 9YinSdcigYRjiYdc,MXUFQndgegdedhUh Q0/,4$ Sji YciXU 9Yin%h;:9 SdcigYRjiYdc, LUU cUmihUSiYdcVdgbdgUTUiQYah,

    &9' ;:9 hjeeaUbUci YhQTdcQiYdcid :;@9%h deUgQiYdchVgdbUYiXUg;:9%h aYcUdVSgUTYi&Ycbdhi SQhUh'(egd\USihUgkYSUVUUh(dg gUhUgkUh&RjYaije Vgdbegd\USi-hUgkYSUVUUhVgdb YhhjYcWBcTjhigYQaKUkUcjU 8dcTh', MXYhgUkUcjU cUmiVYhSQanUQgYcSajTUhegd\USiVUUhVdgiXU 9QhYcd:UkUadebUci ?jcT( iXUOQiUgVgdci;Qhi KUSaQbQiYdcegd\USi(QhlUaaQhdiXUghUgkYSUVUUhQcT adQcgUeQnbUcihSdchYhiUcilYiX iXU SjggUci VYhSQanUQg,MXUegd\USiVUUhQgUiUbedgQgnhdjgSUh dVgUkUcjU, 7iiQSXbUci BBgUegUhUcih;:9%h idiQadeUgQiYcWRjTWUiVdgiXU SjggUci

    $

  • fiscal year, and it provides the project fee sources. The EDC board approves thisbudget. Council approves the City contribution and project fees stemming fromcontracts your Honorable Body approve between the EDC and the City of Detroitfor a particular project/fund, such as the Casino Business Fund. The EDCsupplement remains the same as the current year.

    (D) Represents DDA's reimbursement to DEGC for staff cost and indirect expenses(rent, utilities, supplies, etc.). DDA's contract level is the same as the current fiscalyear.

    (E) The LDFA budget is based upon tax increment revenues, service fees, Cityreimbursement, and interest/other income drawn down from the MichiganEconomic Development Corporation (MEDC) in prior years. The LDFAcontribution remains the same as the current year. See Attachment III for LDFA'scurrent year's budget that was approved by Council.

    (F) The Environmental Affairs Department has entered into a contract with the DBRAto reimburse the DEGC for DEGC administrative services. See Attachment IV forDBRA's operating budget for the current fiscal year, adopted by the DBRA board.

    (G) Private sector contributions are expected to remain the same as the current year.

    (G1) With the approval of the Boards of the various Authorities that DEGC administers,the DEGC has hired an in-house General Counsel. Funding for the position andassistance is received through the reallocation of the existing legal budgets of thevarious Authorities. This is done at a much lower rate than if the DEGC were stillusing an external law firm as its General Counsel, resulting in a net savings to theAuthorities.

    (H) The DEGC has entered into contractual agreements to provide administrativeservices (such as accounting and financial reporting services) for Eastern Marketand the former Next Detroit Neighborhood Initiative (this organization will berenamed), both Michigan non-profit corporations.

    (I) The DEGC includes interest income in the Services/Other Fees revenue line item.

    (J) The DEGC expects to receive this level of service fees from the Detroit IndustrialRevolving Loan Fund (DIRLF). The DEGC has received permission from thefederal Economic Development Administration (EDA) to utilize this fund forcommercial projects as well. Formerly, the EDA Title 9 monies, which support theloan fund, could be used only for industrial projects. The DIRLF can now provideup to $200,000 in commercial loan funds. In addition, due to interest rates and thetiming of cash receipts, the DEGC is no longer able to capture any real interestincome in a given year.

    Please note that the remaining explanations relate to expenditures.

    (K) The DEGC continues to operate with 38 employees and 2 consultants (last yearthe DEGC had 3 consultants). In addition, the DEGC has hired an internal General

    3

  • Counsel, and a new Office Manager who is doubling as a Legal Assistant. Fringescost remains about 29% of payroll, but cost go up due to normal increases inhealth care and the addition of the general counsel and office manager positions.

    (L) The DEGC is cutting back on legal services as it realizes some savings bringing anin-house general counsel. Professional services go down due to reduced funding.

    (M) The travel/meetings/marketing budget remains the same.

    (N) The rent/utilities/insurance budget remains the same.

    (0) The DEGC's line of credit is fully exhausted and no interest payment is expected in2013-14.

    (P) The equipment budget remains the same.

    (Q) "Other" includes postage, building maintenance, delivery, supplies, printing, dues,publications & subscriptions, processing fees, special projects, advertising,governmental relations/fund raising and other miscellaneous expenses. Thisbudget remains the same.

    The DEGC is organized so that its employees can be more functionally oriented ratherthan departmentally oriented. This way, staff can use their skills to work on a broadspectrum of citywide projects rather than on projects related to a specific area, such ascommercial development. The DEGC has clarified, however, whom employees reportto, thereby, maintaining accountability.

    Attached is DEGC's most recent organizational chart (Attachment V).

    Economic Development Corporation (EDC)

    In the proposed 2013-14 budget for POD, POD requested a contribution of $255,000 tothe EDC, but the Mayor recommends a contribution of $200,000, a 21.6% reductionfrom POD's request (see Attachment I). The chart below shows the City's contributionsto the DEGC since 2007-08:

    City of Detroit's Contribution to the Economic Development Corporationfrom Its Planning and Development Department

    RecommendedFY FY FY FY FY FY FY2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 I 2012-13 2013-14

    ContributionAmount $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $255,000 $255,000 $200,000

    Additionally, as indicated earlier, the EDC does traditionally supplement DEGC's budgetfrom EDC's project service fees and reserves (see EDC's Supplement per DEGC'sbudget in the chart above).

    4

  • The chart below shows the proposed 2013-2014 budget for the EDC as compared tothe current year's budget.

    EDC POD'sEDC Proposed Proposed Comment

    FY 2012- FY 2013- FY 2013-13 14 14 Reference

    Revenue Budget Budget Allocation Difference Letter

    City Contract $255,000 $255,000 $255,000 $0

    Expenses

    Contractual Services-DEGC $250,000 $250,000 $0 (A)Legal/Audit Services-EDC 5,000 5,000 0

    Total $255,000 $255,000 $0

    (A) Represents EDC's reimbursement to DEGC for DEGC staff time and indirect costsallocated to EDC related activity.

    The DEGC hopes to maintain the same level of City contribution in order for the EDC toprovide an adequate amount economic development project services.

    However, again at Attachment II, the current year's operating budget for the EDCdescribes in more detail other revenues captured by the EDC and what expendituresthey pay for.

    Downtown Development Authority (DDA)

    The DDA, a public corporation for the City of Detroit, was established for the purpose ofpromoting and developing economic growth in the City of Detroit's downtown businessdistrict. The DDA has been authorized to fund its General Fund (operating) budget byan ad valorem tax of one mill on real and tangible personal property not exempt by lawin the downtown development district, and by a levy on the increased assessed value ofa tax increment district, and the issuance of negotiable revenue and tax incrementbonds to finance the development activities of the DDA.

    Note: the DDA could receive two mills on real and personal property for operatingpurposes based on the 2010 Census count results.

    Unlike the DEGC and EDC, the DDA does not receive a General Fund contribution.Therefore, the DDA feels they do not need to come before Council during any DEGCand EDC budget hearing. The DDA has expressed that they would be willing toaddress any DDA concerns that Council may have when their operating budget is

    5

  • presented to them in June. Attachment VI represents the current year's operatingbudget for the DDA City Council approved in July 2012.

    Council will recall as well that pursuant to State Public Act No. 197, Council approvesthe Tax Increment Finance Plan, which delineates the anticipated development projectsin the downtown area. Whenever the TIF Plan is amended, the DDA board must firstapprove the amendments, and then the amendments come before Council for approval.This process additionally gives Council an opportunity to review the DDA's policies,plans, and procedures as they relate to development activity in the downtown area.

    Attachment VII represents an excellent chart from the most recent Capital Agendashowing the relationship of the DEGC and related development entities (DDA, EDC,etc.) commonly known as the "alphabet soup". The Capital Agenda also contains briefdescriptions on these development entities with past and pending projects.

    Issues and Questions

    DEGC

    Please describe the impact of the Mayor's proposed 17.6% cut to the City's contributionto the DEGC, going from $850,000 to $700,000, on DEGC services.

    Please describe the DEGC's understanding of Planning and Economic Developmentand City Planning Commission functions consolidating with the DEGC and this willimprove service delivery.

    Please provide the most recent accomplishments by the DEGC, including bothdowntown and neighborhood development projects.

    What major new economic projects the DEGC anticipates working on in 2013-14 forboth downtown and neighborhood development?

    Does the DEGC anticipate the DDA board approving any modifications to the TaxIncrement Financing Plan and Development Plan for Development Area No.1 soon forCouncil's approval?

    Please describe the impact of the Mayor's proposed 21.6% cut to the City's contributionto the DEGC, going from $255,000 to $200,000, on EDC services.

    Please provide the most recent schedule of the Casino Business Development Funddollars, showing budget versus actual revenues and expenditures, with balances. Ifavailable, please provide an explanation of individual program expenditures to date.

    What major industrial projects you have on the horizon?

    BRDA

    6

  • Please provide the most recent spreadsheet of brownfield redevelopment projects withanticipated investment and job creation levels.

    What is causing the lower number of brownfield redevelopment projects in the last yearcoming before Council?

    LDFA

    Is the Local Development Finance Authority generating sufficient tax incrementrevenues to meet debt service requirements?

    Is the Downtown Development Authority generating sufficient tax increment revenues tomeet debt service requirements?

    Other

    Please provide a copy of the June 30, 2012 audited financial statements for the DEGCand affiliates, EDC, LDFA, DBRA, and the DDA.

    IC: 1\2013-14\IC\DEGC-EDC-DDA 13 14.doc

    Attachments

    7

  • .p~,-h~t ....r .rCITY OF DETROIT

    Planning and Development DepartmentFinancial Detail by Appropriation and Organization

    2012-13 2013-14 2013-14Redbook Dept Final Mayor's

    Community Development Request Budget RecCommunity Development FTE AMOUNT FTE AMOUNT FTE AMOUNT

    APPROPRIA TlONORGANIZA TION

    00014 - Community Development360130 - Community Development 0 $219,357 0 $271,782 0 $181,966

    APPROPRIATION TOTAL 0 $219,357 0 $271,782 0 $181,966

    00595 - Economic Development Corporation360134 - Economic Development Corporation 0 $255,000 0 $255,000 0 $200,000

    APPROPRIATION TOTAL 0 $255,000 0 $255,000 0 $200,000

    00597 - Economic Growth Corporation360135 - Economic Growth Corporation 0 $850,000 0 $850,000 0 $700,000

    APPROPRIATION TOTAL 0 $850,000 0 $850,000 0 $700,000

    05797 - Eight Mile Boulevard BG360600 - Eight Mile Boulevard BG 0 $22,700 0 $22,700 0 $22,700

    APPROPRIATION TOTAL 0 $22,700 0 $22,700 0 $22,700

    11134 - Office of Neighborhood Development - PO363125 - Office of Neighborhood Development 1 $125,764 0 $0 0 $0

    APPROPRIATION TOTAL 1 $125,764 0 $0 0 $0

    11302 - ONCR Project363138 - ONCR Project 0 $40,000 0 $0 0 $0

    APPROPRIATION TOTAL 0 $40,000 0 $0 0 $0

    12368 - DTC Loan Repayment364046 - DTC Loan Repayment 0 $147,000 0 $147,000 0 $147,000

    APPROPRIATION TOTAL 0 $147,000 0 $147,000 0 $147,000

    13529 - Section 108 Loans364082 - Garfield Sec 108 Loan 0 $260,603 0 $251,805 0 $251,805

    364083 - Stuberstone Sec 108 Loan 0 $35,658 0 $34,485 0 $34,485

    364084 - Ferry Street Inn Sce 108 Loan 0 $266,426 0 $332,888 0 $332,888

    364085 - New Amsterdam Sec 108 Loan 0 $842,321 0 $843,545 0 $843,545

    364086 - Mexicantown Mercado Sec 108 Loan 0 $0 0 $574,130 0 $574,130364087 - Garfield II Sce 108 Loan 0 $487,710 0 $485,755 0 $485,755

    364088 - Vernor Lawndale See 108 Loan 0 $97,489 0 $545,874 0 $545,874

    364089 - Book Cadillac Sec 108 Loan 0 $921,323 0 $1,623,003 0 $1,623,003

    36-9

  • ~J. n\ (IV) +: 7/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF

    DETROITOPERATING BUDGET

    JULY 1, 2012 TO JUNE 30, 2013

    Proposed BudgetJune 3D, 2013

    REVENUE

    City of DetroitTSF From Waterfront ReclamationTSF From Other ProjectsTSF From Casino Development FundTSF From Wayne State UDAGTSF From Trizec AnnuityOther Revenue & Service Fees

    255,000200,000140,000350,00050,000

    350,00025,000

    TOTAL REVENUE 1,370,000

    EXPENSES

    Detroit Economic Growth CorpDetroit Economic Growth Corp Special ProjOther Projects Administrative FeesLegal ServicesAuditMiscellaneous

    650,000500,000140,00033,00027,00020,000

    TOTAL EXPENSES 1,370,000

    Operating Surplus/(Shortfall) o

    Debt Service(Increase)/Decrease in Reserve

    oo

    NET SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL) o

  • II ~Lh rYl.fVl r 'firLOCAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY

    OPERATING BUDGETJULY 1,2012 TO JUNE 30,2013

    Proposed BudgetJune 30, 2013

    REVENUE

    TAX INCREMENT REVENUES RELEASED CURRENT YEARCITY REIMBURSEMENTINTEREST/OTHER INCOME

    150,000o

    25,000

    TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 175,000

    TOTAL REVENUE 175,000

    EXPENSES

    DETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATIONMAINTENANCE/OTHER

    125,00050,000

    TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 175,000

    TOTAL EXPENSES 175,000

    Operating Surplus/(Shortfall) o

    (lncrease)/Decrease in Reserve oNET SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL) o

    r:\Idfa\operating\budget2012_ 13.xls

  • A~~"",,,fV\t- FCITY OF DETROIT BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    OPERATING BUDGETJULY 1, 2012 TO JUNE 30, 2013

    Proposed BudgetJune 30, 2013

    REVENUE

    CITY OF DETROITBROWNFIELD APPLICATION / ADMIN. FEESINTEREST/OTHER INCOME

    o235,000

    500

    TOTAL REVENUE 235,500

    EXPENSES

    DETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATIONPUBLIC NOTICES/ADVERTISINGLEGALAUDITINSURANCEWORKSHOPS/PROMOTIONOTHER EXPENSES

    250,00026,00030,00010,00022,0001,5001,000

    TOTAL EXPENSES 340,500

    Operating Surplus/(Shortfall) (105,000)

    (Increase)/Decrease in Reserve 105,000

    NET SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL) o

    r:\dbra\operating\budget12_ 13.xls

  • Diane Stafford

    Executive Assistant

    George W. Jackson, Jr.CEO

    -----------( \I Ron Flies I____-J I

    I Executive Consultant I

    ,----------~Rebecca Navin

    General Counsel

    OEGC

    ~We're all business.

    Art Papapanos

    Vice President

    Board Administration

    r---I-----,Jennifer Kanalos

    BrownfieldRedevelopment

    Program Manager

    Gay HilgerAdministrative

    Associate

    Tiffini D. SmithDirector

    Corporate Communications

    Brian Holdwick

    Executive Vice President

    Business Development &Financial Services

    Olga Stella

    Vice President

    Business Development

    Waymon Guillebeaux

    Executwe Vice President

    Project Management &Construction Services

    ( - -G~ry-B::n - ':

    ----~: Construction I, Consultant I--------'"I

    Carla HudsonDocument

    Management

    Malinda JensenDirector

    Business Development

    Mark Denson Tracie TillingerBusiness Development Business Development

    Manager Manager

    Kenyetta Harriston-

    ~

    William DillonBridges

    Business DevelopmentBusinessDevelopmentManager Manager

    Mariangela Pledl H Spencer OlenikBusiness Development Development AssistantManagerWendy Hill

    DevelopmentAssociate

    Malik Goodwin

    Vice President -Project Management

    I

    Will TammingaDirector

    Project Management

    Scott Veldhuis Tim MilesSenior Project Senior Project

    Manager Manager

    Cleveland Dailey, III Orza RobertsonProject Manager Project Manager

    Denise Colona

    ~11 David TobarProject Manager Project Manager

    y Sandra Smith~

    Andrea Haas

    Real Estate Manager Associate ProjectManager

    Glen Long, Jr.

    Vice President Administration

    Chief Financial Officer

    Kelly Shovan

    H Joyce JosaitisAssistantController Office ManagerDenise Hundley lJ Vickey Thompson

    Contract & BenefitsFinance Associate I I AdministratorElizabeth Reaves H Edward FisherAccounting Office AssistantAssociate

    ~

    Sheila AnthonyReceptionist

    ~

    Lamont DavisLAN/WAN

    Administrator

    1Terrance Jordan

    Senior LAN

    AdministratorTechnologyCoordinator

  • /J~hYl1e~r < IIIDOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    BUDGET2012-2013

    2012-13BUDGET

    REVENUES:

    Current taxes - one mil $ 850,000Earnings on investments 1,000Transfer from Tax Increment Fund 500,000State BusinessTax Refund 0Parking Operations 825,000Other 20,000From/(To) prior year balance 334,000

    TOTAL REVENUES $ 2,530,000

    EXPENSES:

    Contractual ServicesDetroit Economic Growth Corp $ 1,500,000Annual Audit 29,000

    Sub-Total $ 1,529,000

    Professional Service FeesLegal Services $ 200,000Insurance 250,000Advertisi ng/Marketi ng 16,000Computer Support 10,000

    Sub-Total $ 476,000

    Parking Lots Management $ 25,000

    Special Projects & Contingencies $ 500,000

    TOTAL EXPENSES $ 2,530,000

    r:\acct\dda\operatin\bud12_ 13.xls

  • - - -

    David BingMayor - City of Detroit

    Indicates a Professional,24123 st Services Agreement exists

    between the entities

    PROPOSED CAPITAL AGENDA FY 2013-14 through 2017-18

    )

    CiS la.uuEI 1.&.= = ISAk, .. ""'-"_" ~~ . _._.>

    aMife&"WoodwardCorridor

    ImprovementAuthority

    316