delchi carrier,spa v. rotorex corp 1994wl 495787 (1994) united states district court(n.d.n.y)
DESCRIPTION
Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y). By: 吴青晖 刘建平 张玲芬 周玉珊 梁敏婷 钟桢. Part 1: Facts. Informed Rotorex that the compressors would be used in producing Arieles air conditioners. ( Plaintiff ). (Defendant). Rotorex. Delchi. (Italy). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
by 吴青晖
Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp1994WL 495787 (1994)United States District
Court(N.D.N.Y)
By: 吴青晖 刘建平 张玲芬 周玉珊 梁敏婷 钟桢
![Page 2: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
by 吴青晖
Delchi Rotorex
Informed Rotorex that the compressors would be used in producing Arieles air conditioners
Agreed to sell air compressors
( Plaintiff ) (Defendant)
(Italy) (New York)
In preparation
39 million lire for special tooling
27 million lire for special insulation and tubing
Part 1: Facts
![Page 3: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
by 吴青晖
On March 26,1988
Delchi Rotorexsent a first sea shipment
paid $188,000
Spent 18 million lire on shipping and customs duties
![Page 4: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
by 吴青晖
On or about May 9,1988
Delchi Rotorex
Sent a second shipment
paid $130,000
Discovered the compressors from the first lot were nonconforming.
Rejected the compressors and cancelled the contract.
The second shipment was en route
![Page 5: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
by 吴青晖
Delchi
Replaced problematicgrommets,inspected,
repaired and retested the compressors
Storedthesecond shipment
Arranged to have a shipment of Sanyo compressors sent by air freight
Modified the electrical panels
Delchi’s Assembly line shut down
Stored the rejected compressors
![Page 6: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
by 吴青晖
Delchi was still unable to fill some orders.
Delchi brought this action for damages.
![Page 7: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
by 刘建平
Legal issue:what damages is Delchi
entitled to recover?
No controversy about defendant’s breach of Contract (Art.35)
Part 2: legal issue & back ground knowledge
![Page 8: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
by 刘建平
Damages
Direct damages Consequential damages
![Page 9: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
by 刘建平
Direct damages : damages for a loss that is an
immediate, natural, and foreseeable result of the wrongful act .
Consequential damages: injury or harm that does not ensue
directly and immediately from the act of a party, but only from some of the result of such act.
![Page 10: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
by 刘建平
Consequential damages:Damages averred by Delchi Decision
s of D.C.
Plaintiff’s attempts to remedy nonconformity
Expedited shipment of Sanyo compressorsHandling & storage of rejected compressors
Lost profits
a total of 546,377,612 lire in lost profits in Italyadditional lost profit from indicated orders in Italy.Modification of electrical panel
hold
hold
hold
hold
nonsupportnonsupport
![Page 11: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
by 刘建平
Damages averred by Delchi Decisions of D.C.
Shipping, customs & incidentals relating to two shipmentsThe cost of obsolete insulation & tubing
The cost of obsolete toolingLabor costs for four days when Delchi’s production line is idle.
nonsupport
nonsupportnonsupportnonsupport
![Page 12: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
by 刘建平
The applicable rules:Article 7.2.Questions concerning matters
governed by this Convention which are not expressly settled in it are to be settled in conformity with the general principles on which it is based or, in the absence of such principles, in conformity with the law applicable by virtue of the rules of private international law.
![Page 13: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
by 刘建平
Article 74 Damages for breach of contract by one
party consist of a sum equal to the loss, including loss of profit, suffered by the other party as a consequence of the breach.
Such damages may not exceed the loss which the party in breach foresaw or ought to have foreseen at the time of the conclusion of the contract, in the light of the facts and matters of which he then knew or ought to have known, as a possible consequence of the breach of contract.
![Page 14: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
by 刘建平
Article 75If the contract is avoided and if, in a
reasonable manner and within a reasonable time after avoidance, the buyer has bought goods in replacement or the seller has resold the goods, the party claiming damages may recover the difference between the contract price and the price in the substitute transaction as well as any further damages recoverable under article 74.
![Page 15: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
by 刘建平
Article 77A party who relies on a breach of
contract must take such measures as are reasonable in the circumstances to mitigate the loss, including loss of profit, resulting from the breach. If he fails to take such measures, the party in breach may claim a reduction in the damages in the amount by which the loss should have been mitigated.
![Page 16: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
by 张玲芬
Part 3: Reasoning
![Page 17: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
by 张玲芬
Delchi should recover these damages
Rotorex shipped with nonconforming compressors
Delchi spent several million lire in curing the defects in Rotorex’s compressors (which were not
Anticipated cost of production)
Pursuant to CISG Art.74, the costs are foreseeable consequential damages
①Plaintiff’s attempts to remedy nonconformity
![Page 18: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
by 张玲芬
Delchi failed to repair the nonconforming compressors
Under CISG,Delchi should obtain some substitute compressors from other sources to
mitigate its damages (Art.77)
But actually, Delchi failed to obtain substitute from other sources.
Then Delchi expedited Sanyo compressors by air which were previously ordered
So some orders could be filled
②Expedited shipment of Sanyo compressors
![Page 19: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
by 张玲芬
Delchi is not entitled to recover the difference between the contract price and the price in the Sanyo compressors
under CISG Art.75 ( …within a reasonable time after avoidance ,the buyer
has bought goods in replacement …in the substitute transaction …)
In this case
the shipment ofpreviously ordered Sanyo compressors
Substitute for the nonconforming
Rotorex compressors≠
![Page 20: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
by 张玲芬
Nonetheless, Delchi is entitled to recover the expense of expediting shipment of Sanyo compressors From the facts part:
So that it could fill some orders and mitigate its damages
Rotorex failed to supply conforming compressors
Delchi expedited Sanyo compressors by airwhich previously ordered
![Page 21: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
by 张玲芬
So, expedited shipment of Sanyo compressors was both commercially reasonable and reasonably foreseeable
therefore Delchi is entitled to recover the net cost of early delivery of Sanyo compressors .
Net cost = cost of air shipment – cost of ocean shipment
![Page 22: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
by 周玉珊
③Handling and Storage of Rejected Compressors
The expense relating to the first shipment.
A reasonable expense for the second shipment, though Delchi failed to establish the precise cost of storage of second shipment.
![Page 23: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
by 周玉珊
④Lost profits
a. Why did Delchi suffer a loss resulting from a diminished volume of sales?
b. How to estimate the amount of damages?
c. The lost profit damages that Delchi is entitled to recover.
d. The lost profit damages that Delchi is not entitled to recover.
![Page 24: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
by 周玉珊
a. Why did Delchi suffer a loss resulting from a diminished volume of sales?Suppose that…
Be able to fill the orders
Sufficient Arieles air conditioners
Sufficient conforming compressors
Gain profits
![Page 25: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
by 周玉珊
However…
Defective compressors
Insufficient conforming compressors
Insufficient Arieles air conditioners for sales
Be unable to fill all of the orders
Lost profits
Although expedite shipment of Sanyo
compressors
![Page 26: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
by 周玉珊
b. How to estimate the amount of damages?
Under CISG Art.7 (2)In this case, common law & the law
of New YorkA party must provide the finder of
fact with sufficient evidence to estimate the amount of damages with reasonable certainty.
![Page 27: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
by 周玉珊
Formula
Lost profits = Sales price — Manufacturing cost — Other cost ( royalty, average commission, commercial/financial
cost, etc.)
![Page 28: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
by 周玉珊
The lost profit damages that Delchi is entitled to recover: a total of 546 million lire in lost profits in Italy,
as it proved with sufficient certainty that it incurred as a foreseeable and direct result of Rotorex’s breach.
![Page 29: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
by 周玉珊
The lost profit damages that Delchi is not entitled to recover: its additional lost profits in Italy,
because Delchi did not prove with sufficient certainty any lost sales from indicated (anticipated) orders in Italy.
![Page 30: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
by 周玉珊
Only provided…Speculative testimony
Provided no…DocumentationEvidence
![Page 31: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
by 周玉珊
*Modification of electrical panels
Not directly attribute to Rotorex’s breach
Not regular cost
![Page 32: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
by 梁敏婷
cost claims District court Court of Appeals
A: remedy the nonconformity
B: expediting shipment from Sanyo
C: storing the rejected compressors
D: lost profits for diminished sales volume
E: modification of electrical panels
F:4000 addition lost sales in Italy
G: shipping ,customs, incidentals
H: obsolete insulation and tubing
I: obsolete tooling
J: labor costs downtime form may 16-19
√
√
√√
×
×
×
××
×
affirm
reverse
remand
![Page 33: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
by 梁敏婷
The district court concluded that Delchi was not entitled to recover the cost of :G:, shipping,customs, incidentalsH: obsolete insulation and tubingI: obsolete tooling
![Page 34: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
by 梁敏婷
Because…
G,H,I are reasonable cost for manufacturing the air conditioners
G,H,I are accounted for in Delchi’s recovery on his lost profits
it would lead to a double recovery
![Page 35: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
by 梁敏婷
Court of appeals concluded that Delchi was entitled to recover the cost of :G: shipping ,customs, incidentalsH: obsolete insulation and tubingI: obsolete tooling
![Page 36: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
by 梁敏婷
Because…
Premise: The contract was performed completely.
G,H,I could not transform to any profits asthe compressors were defective.
Cut into the lost profits
G,H,I were unreasonable expense
![Page 37: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
by 梁敏婷
Rotorex Customs Manufacturingplant,inspect
Genoa Discover thenonconformity
![Page 38: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
by 梁敏婷
insulation tubing tooling
Rotorex’s compressors
Obsolete, useless
![Page 39: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
by 梁敏婷
the district court the court of appeal
reasonable costs consequential damages
should not be be compensated
compensated
G,H,I
![Page 40: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
by 梁敏婷
Labor expense:
Fixed costs- variable costs-
feature have no relation to the output
fluctuate with a firm’s output
when a breach occured
should not be awarded
Should be awarded
District court Court of appeals
decision Fixed costs
reasons Has no detail materialsSufficient evidences
remand
![Page 41: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
by 钟桢
The results of breach of contract are hard to be predicted and made sure in advance .There must be the happening of the damages fact and the compensation can not be beyond the actual damages . Art.74
Part4:comments
![Page 42: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
by 钟桢
the practical damages And the lost profits
reliance expenditure expectation interest
(a) shipping , customs , and incidentals relating to the two shipments of Rotorex compressors
(b) the cost of obsolete insulation and tubing that Delchi purchased only for use with Rotorex compressors
(c) the cost of obsolete insulation and tooling purchased only for production of units with Rotorex compressors .
the profit that Delchi can get from its conditioners orders , which amounting to millions of lire in lost profit .
![Page 43: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
by 钟桢
What’s the essential cause leading to the first trial of the court’s mistake ?
What’s the essence of the (a) (b) (c) damages ?
The cost relates to the expectation ?
OR
The reliance expenditure
Unreasonable/additional
![Page 44: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
by 钟桢
(Article 75) If the contract is avoided and within a reasonable time after avoidance ,
the buyer has bought goods in replacement …the party claiming damages may
recover the difference between the contract price …
![Page 45: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
by 钟桢
CHEN XIAO ZHONG ZHENSell : 1000 Nokia N70
OUYANG TIAN YUANpurchase
Attached( 附带的 ) gifts : 1000 special( 专用的 ) batteries( 电池 )
(failed)
(failed)
(another example)
![Page 46: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
by 钟桢
Delchi and Sanyo had concluded a contract before the inspection !!!!
![Page 47: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
by 钟桢
OUYANG TIAN YUAN
CHEN XIAO
Purchase order : a shipment of farm machines for total $40,000
Accept the order , butLatter fail to fill the contract
Bought for replacement 6 months laterWith expensing $50,000
(another example)
![Page 48: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
by 钟桢
Sea Shipment Air freightDelchi had to ask for expedited shipment of Sanyo compressors with additional shipment cost
![Page 49: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
by 钟桢
(Article 77) a party who relies on a breach of contract must take such measures
as a reasonable in the circumstances to mitigate the loss , including loss of profits ,
resulting from the breach . If he fails to take such measures , the party in breach
may claim a reduction in the damages in the amount by which the loss should have
been mitigated .
![Page 50: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
by 钟桢
QUESTION:
Must the duty of “mitigate( 降低) the loss” be limited to just
one kind of remedy--- “damages” ?
![Page 51: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
by 钟桢
justice
reasonable
![Page 52: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
by 钟桢
Legal terms
Customs duty 海关税 Additional expense 额外
花费 Expectation interest 期
待利益 Reliance expenditure 可
信赖支出 Consequential damages
简接损失 Anticipated cost 预期支
出
Unreimbursed expense未偿还支出
Labor cost 工资 Sales volume 销售量 Compensatory damages
补偿性赔偿
![Page 53: Delchi Carrier,SpA v. Rotorex Corp 1994WL 495787 (1994) United States District Court(N.D.N.Y)](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062409/568148d7550346895db5f313/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
by 钟桢
Thank you for your attention !