Deliverable documents planned status 1/2Del. no. Deliverable name WP

no.Responsibilit

y Reviewer 

Nature/disseminatio

n Level

Delivery date from Annex I (proj month)

DeliveredYes/No Actual status

Actual / Forecast

delivery date

D1.2 Quality Control Guidelines 1 SES (Cecilia) SES/MAS

(Elisab/Jos) R/PP 3 Issue 1 Rejected

New draft has been sent to WP1 partner

31/07/2013

D8.4Build Secure Embedded Systems with nSHIELD v1

8 MGEP MAS R/PU 12 No Draft on Wiki15/07/2013

D1.6 Quality Control Report 1 1 SES (Cecilia) SES/MAS

(Elisab/Jos) R/PU 15 No To be started30/09/2013

D1.7 Periodic Management Report 1 SES (Cecilia) SES R/PP 18 No Draft on Wiki (waiting for

JN contribution)30/06/2013

D3.2Preliminary SPD node technologies prototype

3 ISD (Dramitinos) SES P,O/RE 18 Yes Waiting for reviewer

30/9/2013

D3.3Preliminary SPD node technologies prototype report

3 ISD (Dramitinos) SES R/PU 18 Yes Waiting for reviewer

30/9/2013

D4.2

Preliminary SPD network technologies prototype

4 SES (Cesena-Kresimir) ETH P,O/RE 18 No Available on Wiki

31/07/2013

D4.3

Preliminary SPD network technologies prototype report

4 SES (Cesena- Kresimir) ETH R/PU 18 No

Available on Wiki 31/07/2013

D5.2

Preliminary SPD middleware and overlay technologies prototype

5UNIROMA1

(Suraci-Fiaschetti)

P,O/RE 18 No On Wiki (80%)

31/07/2013

D5.3

Preliminary SPD middleware and overlay technologies prototype report

5 SES (Morgagni) UNIROMA1 R/PU 18 No On Wiki (95%)

31/07/2013

D6.1 Lifecycle and SPD Support Plan 6 TECNALIA

(Inaki) R/CO 18 No Available on Wiki30/06/2013

Deliverable documents planned status 2/2

Del. no. Deliverable name WP no. Responsibility Reviewer

 Nature/

dissemination Level

Delivery date from Annex I (proj month)

DeliveredYes/No Actual status

Actual / Forecast

delivery date

D6.2 Prototype validation and verification 6 SES

(Morgagni) R/RE 20 No Available on Wiki (30%)

31/08/2013

D6.3 Prototype integration report 6

HAI (Nikolaos)R/RE 22

No 31/08/2013

D7.1Railways security demonstrator - integration and validation plan

7ASTS (Flammini) R/CO 22

No Available on Wiki

30/06/2013

D7.2Voice/Facial Recognition demonstrator - integration and validation plan

7ETH (Paolo)

R/CO 22No 15/07/2013

D7.3

Dependable Avionic Systems demonstrator - integration and validation plan

7SES (Traversone Larghi)

SESMR/CO 22

No 15/07/2013

D7.4Social Mobility and Networking integration and validation plan

7MAS (Josef)

R/CO 22No What kind of

document?

D1.8 Periodic Annual Report 2 1SES (Cecilia) SES

R/PP 24No 30/09/2013

D2.6Final System Requirements and Specifications

2

TECNALIA (With SES-ASTS-ETH-Mas support)

SES

R/PU 24

No 30/09/2013

D8.5 Preliminary Exploitation Plan 8

INDRA (Vasquez-Inasi)

R/PP 24No 30/09/2013

D8.6Build Secure Embedded Systems with nSHIELD v2

8MGEP (Roberto)

MASR/PU 24

No 30/09/2013

Summary and Actions

Action

D8.4(M12) and D8.6(M24): Lorena (AT), Elisabetta (SES) and Paolo (ETH) agreed with the opportunity to deliver two separate documents, as in the TA.

Cecilia (SES) will ask to Josef (MAS) and Roberto (MGEP) to deliver D8.4 as soon as possible, also if in a preliminary stage.

D1.6 Cecilia (SES) will prepare a draft copy of the deliverable

D1.6 Elisabetta (SES) and Lorena (SES) will support and review the document

D3.2 and D3.3 Cecilia (SES) will ask to M. Cesena (SES) to review the deliverables, before the updating on NEF.

D4.2 and D4.3 Paolo (ETH) will be the reviewer for the D4.2 and D4.3

D6.2 and D6.3 The deliverables are on delay because the number of prototypes is higher than expected or previously documented (35 instead 12). The real number of prototypes is one of the results of the meeting of Stockholm.

D7.1-D7.2-D7.3 (M22) A common «Table of contests» (partially derived from the D7.1 draft) will be proposed by SES by Friday 28th and then uploaded on Wiki. The same format could be used for the feasibility study.

Mariana (ASTS) and Paolo (ETH) will adapt their deliverables to the format proposed by SES

D2.6: Elisabetta (SES) and Andrea (SES) told that this deliverable is strictly connected with the D2.2 and that the only activity to be done is asking to each demonstrator leader to verify that the D2.2 includes all the requirements related to each demonstrator and, if is the case, to integrate additional requirements. Consequently the D2.6 leader should just coordinate the activities of each demonstrator leader. They suggested to ask to Inaki to accept the leadership of D2.6

Cecilia will contact Inaki by the middle of the coming week

TA Cecilia (SES) will contact Josef (MAS) for T7.4 short description

- Participants: Elisabetta Campaiola (SES), Andrea Morgagni(SES), Lucio Marcenaro (Unige), Mariana Esposito (ASTS), Paolo Azzoni (ETH), George Dramitinos (ISD)

- The first part of the meeting has been held on Webex, the second part continued on teleconference, because Lucio and Paolo were neither able to hear nor to be heard.