democracy and economic development joseph stiglitz quito july 2006

13
Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Upload: gary-holt

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Democracy and Economic Development

Joseph Stiglitz

Quito

July 2006

Page 2: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Two sided relationship

• Democracy may promote development• Development may promote democracy• Picture complicated by

– No clear definition of democracy– Some economic successes with limited

democracy• But governments felt themselves accountable to

people• And success in development was key to their

legitimacy

Page 3: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Democracy promotes development

• Participation leads to design of policies, programs, projects reflecting needs, circumstances of country– Leading to more country ownership– Ownership leads to more involvement– Better results– Example in water projects

• At other extreme, civil strife undermines development

Page 4: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Democracy is more than periodic voting

• Meaningful democracy requires informed citizenry

• Importance of right to know laws (freedom of information act)– Reflects view that governments work for the citizens

rather than vice-versa– Checks against special interests, corruption– Uncovers incompetence– Secrecy itself can be importance source of corruption

• Artificially created scarcity

Page 5: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

• Information key to reducing agency costs, including in public sector

• Helps explain why so often governments prefer secrecy– Gives them more discretion– Expands scope for corruption– Can actually be source of revenues—”selling” information rents

• In US, other advanced industrial countries, often takes form of “trade”—better press coverage

– Less accountability– Makes political markets less contestable– Exemplified by Bush Administration’s unjustifiable attempt to

greatly expand scope for secrecy

Page 6: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Privacy and secrecy

• Citizens should have presumption to know what government is doing– Narrowly circumscribed exceptions– Secrecy contributed to extending Cold War

• Citizens should have presumption in favor of privacy– Limits abuses of government– When there are exceptions, need oversight

Page 7: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Information and voting

• Voting affected by beliefs• Beliefs affected by media• Media affected by economic/political system• Example—US

– Many Americans still believe there are weapons of mass destruction, link between Iraq and Al-quaeda

– Much less reporting of news stories concerning adverse effects on Iraq, Afghanistan (torture, human rights violations)

Page 8: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Information and voting

• Important to have diversified sources of information– Which is why media concentration even more

a concern that economic concentration in other arenas

• Regulatory discretion and access to “inside” information can lead to self-censorship and distorted news

Page 9: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

“Managing Democracy”• Electoral outcomes affected by

– Who is allowed to vote– Who votes– Voters’ perceptions

• Incumbents attempt to use powers to maintain themselves in office– Use of insider information– Reducing publicly available information

• Puts rivals at a disadvantage– “buying” voters– Media coverage– Gerrymandering districts– Similar to creating and maintaining entry barriers in market economics– Electoral markets are often not highly contestable– Outcomes can be affected by policies

Page 10: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Economic policies and political actions

• Can think of “joint” political and economic equilibrium

• Illustrated by Russia– With high interest rates, open capital markets,

weak rule of law, those who controlled assets had incentives to strip assets and support continuation of No Rule of Law

– There could have been another equilibrium, with wealth creation and strong popular support for rule of law

Page 11: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Implications

• Need to bear in mind long run political consequences of economic policies

• Policies can be used to enhance or weaken democratic processes– With Capital market liberalization market

participants may feel less urgency in creating rule of law, since they can obtain needed wealth protections by shifting assets abroad

Page 12: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

Concluding Remarks

• A broad democratization agenda can strengthen democracy and economic growth– Quality of public management is example of a public

good: the public good of the public good– Active government policies are required

• Focus should be on broadening participation and increasing contestability– Participation will increase if people believe their views

will be heard and their actions maker a difference– Hence contestability will improve participation (and

vice versa)

Page 13: Democracy and Economic Development Joseph Stiglitz Quito July 2006

• Information is a key instrument– Right to know laws– But also community radio, TV stations, newspapers

• Subsidies may be required

• Many of the economic failures of Latin America (and the U.S.) are related to political failures– Democracies are imperfect– Not all voices are heard, or at least heard with equal weight– Campaign contributions in U.S. have a particularly pernicious

effect– Debates about economic reform need to be accompanied by

discussions of political reform • Ending military dictatorships was a great achievement• Now the task to create true democracies