demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning,...

27
the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of the Swiss Federal Commission for Migration, Kulturcasino Bern, October 22nd 2013 The Demographic Outlook for Europe D.A. Coleman Oxford Centre for Population Research

Upload: fay-morton

Post on 18-Jan-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Or demographic senility? The ‘Death of the West’: an enjoyable demographic disaster scenario Europe irretrievably shrinking on the world stage. Europeans obsessed with welfare, not production (or reproduction). Too idle and secularised to be bothered to reproduce; prefer pets. Destined to be crippled by population ageing and decline. To be displaced by vigorous immigrant, mostly Muslim populations. Dependent on US for defence, prefer to sit out crises in their wine cellars.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning,

infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of the Swiss Federal Commission for Migration,

Kulturcasino Bern, October 22nd 2013

The Demographic Outlook for Europe

D.A. ColemanOxford Centre for Population Research

Page 2: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Europe faces demographic maturity?

Relatively smallerDivergent trends, but generally:

Fewer babiesLonger livesOld populationsMore immigrantsDiverse families

Page 3: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Or demographic senility? The ‘Death of the West’: an enjoyable demographic disaster scenario

Europe irretrievably shrinking on the world stage.

Europeans obsessed with welfare, not production (or reproduction).

Too idle and secularised to be bothered to reproduce; prefer pets.

Destined to be crippled by population ageing and decline.

To be displaced by vigorous immigrant, mostly Muslim populations.

Dependent on US for defence, prefer to sit out crises in their wine cellars.

Page 4: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of
Page 5: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

A more sober look - the demographic future is not European….

Population estimates and projections, selected countries 1950-2050. UN 2008-based medium variant projections

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

200019

50

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045

2050

BrazilChinaIndiaSub-Saharan AfricaEuropeNorthern AmericaJapan

Estimates Projections

Page 6: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

And no such thing as ‘Europe’? Divergent demographic trends within Europe. Major European regions, and US, 1960-2060. Source: UN 2013

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045

2050

2055

2060

Population estimates and projections 1960 - 2060, USA and major regions of Europe (millions). UN Medium Variant 2012-based.

USAEastern EuropeNorthern EuropeSouthern EuropeWestern Europe

Estimate Projection

Page 7: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Population estimates and projections, selected European countries 1960 – 2060 (millions).

Source: UN 2013

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045

2050

2055

2060

Population estimates and projections, selected European countries 1960 - 2060 (millions). Source: UN 2012 Medium Variant.

FranceGermanyItalySpainUK

Estimates Projections

Page 8: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

A positive outlook for birth rates.General upward trend in period fertility.Recuperation of fertility.Upward projection of cohort fertility Fertility and female workforce participation –

changes in attitudes.Family policy and prosperity.Consistent ideal family size remains above 2

children.Population reproduction enhanced by

immigration.

Page 9: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Fertility in Europe is no longer declining....period TFR trends, major European regions and USA, 1950 – 2011.

TFR trends European regions and USA 1950 - 2011unweighted means. Source: Council of Europe, Eurostat, national statistical offices

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

1950

1953

1956

1959

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

CEE

Southern Europe

FSU (excluding Moldova)

Northern Europe

Western Europe

USA

Page 10: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Fertility in Europe has not been declining – further evidence: misleading impressions from the TFR

Period Total fertility rate and its adjustmentSelected European countries

adjusted country TFR 2010 TFR 2008 difference (%)

Austria 1.44 1.67 16.0Belgium 1.84 1.93 4.9Denmark 1.87 1.98 5.9France 2.00 2.12 6.0Germany 1.39 1.68 20.9Italy 1.50 1.51 0.7Spain 1.39 1.54 10.8Sweden 1.99 1.97 -1.0Switzerland 1.51 1.69 11.9UK 1.98 2.12 7.1

Source: European Demographic Data Sheet 2012

Tempo and parity adjustment

Page 11: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Evidence from real women. Cohort total fertility at age 40, Nordic women born 1935 – 1963.

Source: Andersson, Knudsen et al. 2009, Figure 2.

Page 12: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

The prospect of population replacement. Sweden, stable completed family size, women born 1870 – 1967.

Source; Statistics Sweden 2013, p.12.

Page 13: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

And possibly an increase? Trends and projections in cohort fertility, women born

1950 – 1979. Shaded area is projected. Source: Myrskyla, Goldstein and Cheng 2013, Figure 1.

Page 14: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Family size preferences relatively constant

Mean personal ideal number of children by country, womenEurobarometer rounds 2001, 2006 and 2011. Selected countries.

2001 2006 2011Austria 2.03 1.82 1.84Denmark 2.46 2.64 2.37France 2.52 2.59 2.47Germany 1.96 2.24 2.15Italy 2.36 2.13 2.06Netherlands 2.31 2.49 2.12Spain 2.35 2.34 2.29Sweden 2.49 2.64 2.33UK 2.53 2.52 2.20EU 27 2.17EU 15 2.32 2.38Source: Rital Testa 2012 tables A.2.1. and A.2.2, 2006 t.6Eurobarometer 2001, 2006, 2011http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/edrp_2_2012.pdfRita Testa 2006, t6, Special Eurobarometer 253

Page 15: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Extra-marital births associated with higher, not lower, total fertility at the national level

Australia

Austria

Belarus

Belgium

Bulgaria

Canada

CroatiaCyprus

Czech Republic

Denmark

Estonia

Finland

France

Georgia

Germany

Greece

Hungary

Iceland

Ireland

Italy

JapanKorea

Latvia

Lithuania

Luxemburg

Malta

Moldova

Montenegro

NetherlandsNew Zealand

Norway

Poland

Portugal

Romania

RussiaSerbia

Slovakia

Slovenia

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

Taiwan

UK

USA

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4

Prop

ortio

n of

bir

ths

outs

ide

mar

riag

e per

100

0

Total fertility

TFR and extramarital births per thousand live births 2009

The Empty Quarter

Page 16: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Reversal of correlation between womens’ workforce participation between 1970s and 1990s + at the national level.

(n.b. decline in Southern, Eastern European TFR)

YEAR: 1994

perc entage of f em ales aged 15-64 in employ ment

908070605040

tota

l fer

tilit

y r

ate

2.2

2.0

1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2 Rsq = 0 .5165

FRG

USA

UK

SWE

ESP

POR

NOR

NL

LUX

ITA

IRE

ICE

GRE

FRA

FINDENCAN

BEL

AUT

YEAR: 1970

percentage of females aged 15-64 in employment

706050403020

total

fertili

ty rat

e

4.0

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5 Rsq = 0.3169

FRG

USAUK

SWI

SWE

ESPPOR

NORNL

LUX

ITA

IRE

ICE

GRE FRA

FIN

DEN

CANBEL AUT

Page 17: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

High fertility at the top.The 5 female CEOs in the FTSE: Cynthia Carroll – 4 children. Angela

Ahrendts – 3 children. Katherine Garrett-Cox 4 children (under 7). Marjorie Scardino – 3 children. Alison Cooper – 2 children (average = 3.2).

Page 18: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Relationship between index of gender equality and total fertility, selected European

countries 2004. Source: Rindfuss et al. 2010.

Page 19: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Ageing inevitable, but not forever - projection of Potential Support Ratio, UK 2011 – 2086 on different definitions of aged population.

Source: based on ONS 2010-based Principal Projection.

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

2011

2016

2021

2026

2031

2036

2041

2046

2051

2056

2061

2066

2071

2076

2081

2086

Age

d Po

tent

ial S

uppo

rt R

atio

APSR 20-75 (graduated)

APSR 20-69

APSR 15-64

Page 20: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Demography isn’t everythingAgeing Vulnerability Index 2003

Public Fiscal Benefit Elder

Overall Index Burden Room Dependence Affluence

Rank Score Rank Rank Rank Rank

Australia 1 -1 2 2 4 6UK 2 7 1 1 6 11US 3 18 3 4 3 1Canada 4 42 6 6 5 2Sweden 5 48 4 3 8 10Japan 6 50 9 9 1 3Germany 7 52 7 5 11 5Netherlands 8 62 8 7 9 4Belgium 9 63 5 8 10 9France 10 81 10 10 12 8Italy 11 84 11 11 2 12Spain 12 93 12 12 7 7

weight 1/3 1/3 1/6 1/6

Source: Jackson and Howe 2003, Figure 18

Page 21: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

The demographic contribution of migration, selected Western countries, 2010/2011.

Selected Western countries Comparisons of live births, net immigration and natural increase 2011

Net migrationPopulation Live Natural Net as percent

1st Jan 2011 births increase migration of birthsdata in thousands

Switzerland 7870 81 18 66 81Norway 4920 60 19 47 78Austria 8404 78 2 37 48Germany 81752 663 -190 282 43UK 62499 808 256 235 29Belgium 11001 131 23 16 12France mét 63128 828 253 77 9

Total of above 239574 2648 379 759 29

Australia 22684 298 151 208 70Canada 34484 382 129 209 55United States 309122 3999 1531 695 17

Sources: Eurostat, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Canada, Statistics New Zealand, US Census Bureau , National Center for Health Statistics, US Dept of Homeland Security.Note: US data refer to 2010, Australia , Canada and New Zealand to 2012. Net immigration data not available for US. Admission for permanent settlementfigure reduced by 1/3 allow for return migration.

Page 22: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Population replacement – incorporating migration into indices of reproduction.

Population replacement: TFR compared with ameasure ('Combined Reproduction') incorporating migration.

US and selected European countries around 2010'Combined

TFR Reproduction'

US 2.09 2.56France 1.98 2.24UK 1.88 2.38Sweden 1.87 2.55Netherlands 1.75 1.94Switzerland 1.43 2.27Czech Republic 1.40 1.61Germany 1.35 1.48Latvia 1.32 1.17

Source: Ediev et al. 2013 Table 5.

Page 23: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Comparison of projections of foreign-origin populations in Europe

(first and ‘second’ generation, percent of total population 2000 – 2050).

Projected growth of population of immigrant or foreign origin 2000-2050, selected countries, as percent of total population.

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

perc

ent

Germany medium variantUSA medium variant (excludes black population)Netherlands base scenarioDenmark 2002- based medium variantSweden foreign background 2004 basedAustria 'Compensating' scenario, no naturalisation.

Page 24: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

The faces of the future?

Page 25: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Longer lives and good health – for some

Current Western survival trends mostly very favourable, including ‘oldest-old’.

Biological views less optimistic, and new threats (e.g. obesity).

Diverging trends in CEE, former Soviet Union.Healthy old age essential for managing population

ageing.Education important for healthy old age.No upper limit yet evident in life expectancy.

Page 26: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Male expectation of life at birth, trends 1945-2011, selected European countries. Source: Eurostat and

national statistical offices.

60

65

70

75

80

1945

1948

1951

1954

1957

1960

1963

1966

1969

1972

1975

1978

1981

1984

1987

1990

1993

1996

1999

2002

2005

2008

Expectation of life at birth, males, selected European countries 1945 - 2011. Source: Eurostat and national statistical yearbooks.

Switzerland Sweden

EU15 United Kingdom

France Poland

Finland Hungary

Russia

OXPOP

Page 27: Demographic development in focus: the significance of migration in the context of spatial planning, infrastructure and environment. Annual Conference of

Concluding pointsRelative numerical decline of Europe inevitable.Divergent trends: demographic losers and winners. Fertility trends in ‘Western’ Europe favourable.Management of population ageing depends on non-

demographic measures. Healthy old age important.No demographic evidence yet for an end to increase in

expectation of life.Persistent migration may lead to ethnic transformation.Equilibrium position of birth and death rates (if any) is

unknown.World population may decline after 2070.