denis caromel,yu feng inria sophia, unsa-i3s-cnrs france
DESCRIPTION
Pro Active , GridCOMP, GCM and The 2006 Grid Plugtests: Towards interoperability and Standardization. Denis Caromel,Yu Feng INRIA Sophia, UNSA-I3S-CNRS France. ProActive. Open Source. ProActive: Open Source. Open to Industry Standards Effective: Used for The Grid - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
INSERT PROJECT ACRONYM HERE BY EDITING THE MASTER SLIDE (VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER)
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
ProProActiveActive, GridCOMP, GCM and , GridCOMP, GCM and The 2006 Grid Plugtests: The 2006 Grid Plugtests:
Towards interoperability and StandardizationTowards interoperability and Standardization
Denis Caromel,Yu Feng Denis Caromel,Yu Feng INRIA Sophia, UNSA-I3S-CNRS INRIA Sophia, UNSA-I3S-CNRS
FranceFrance
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
ProActiveProActive
Open
Source
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
ProActive: Open Source ProActive: Open Source
• Open to Open to Industry Standards
• Effective:Effective:Used for
The Grid Plugtests
Over 2000 CPU across the world at once
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
ProActive GUIsProActive GUIs
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
• GCM: Grid Component ModelGCM: Grid Component ModelGCM Being defined in the NoE CoreGRID
(42 institutions)Open Source ObjectWeb ProActive implements a preliminary version of GCMAutonomic FeaturesService Oriented: NESSI relation exp. (Services come to life from Cp)
• GridCOMP takes:GridCOMP takes:GCM as a first specification, ProActive as a starting point, and Open Source reference implementation.
INSERT PROJECT ACRONYM HERE BY EDITING THE MASTER SLIDE (VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER)
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
GCMGCM + +
Scopes and Objectives:Scopes and Objectives:
Grid Codes that Compose and DeployGrid Codes that Compose and Deploy
No programming, No Scripting, … No PainNo programming, No Scripting, … No Pain
Innovation:Innovation:
Composite Components Composite Components
Multicast and GatherCastMulticast and GatherCast
AutonomicAutonomic
MultiCastMultiCast GatherCastGatherCast
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
GridCOMP PartnersGridCOMP Partners
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
GCM for Code Coupling : GCM for Code Coupling : Vibro Acoustic (courtesy of EADS)Vibro Acoustic (courtesy of EADS)
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
GCM for Electromagnetism: Jem3DGCM for Electromagnetism: Jem3D
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
Jem3DJem3D
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
Executed on Executed on
Grid5000Grid5000
SeveralSeveral
ClustersClusters
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
GRID PlugtestsGRID Plugtests
Over 4 000 machines all over the worldOver 4 000 machines all over the world
• Organized together with:Organized together with:
• Using for interoperability:Using for interoperability:
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
GRID Plugtests -- 2006 FlowShop contestGRID Plugtests -- 2006 FlowShop contest• Goal of the FlowShop contest Goal of the FlowShop contest
Solve the 10 Taillard instances with 20 jobs and 20 machines
• 2005 FlowShop contest2005 FlowShop contestThe winner was POZNAN PUTat3AM - POLAND (4
581s)
• 2006 FlowShop contest (4 teams)2006 FlowShop contest (4 teams)BUPT – Beijing University - ChinaKanban System - University of Tokyo - Japan
• The winner is Kanban System: 553 s, 207 The winner is Kanban System: 553 s, 207 workersworkersBeating 2005 FlowShop contest recordBUPT: 13 760 s, 86 workers
www.lifl.fr/OPAC
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
GRID Plugtests – 2006 NQueens contestGRID Plugtests – 2006 NQueens contest• Goal of the N-Queens contest Goal of the N-Queens contest
Solve the maximum number of N-Queens solutions in1 hourOn a maximum number of machines With the most efficient algorithm
• 2006 N-Queens contest (10 teams)2006 N-Queens contest (10 teams)Eight Samurai - University of Tokyo – JAPANFIT – Tsinghua University - CHINABUPT – Beijing University - CHINAVU – Vrije University - NETHERLANDSChinaGrid – CHINAMOAIS/Kaapi – FRANCE using direct loginUDP - Diego Portales University - CHILELSC/UFSM – BRAZIL POZNAN PUT@3AM - POLAND POZNAN OUTPUT - POLAND
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
2006 N-Queens contest2006 N-Queens contest
• The The 3rd ProActive Prize3rd ProActive Prize winner is winner is VU – Vrije UniversityVU – Vrije University Calculated N=22 Queens in 27mn
• The The 2nd ProActive Prize2nd ProActive Prize winner is ex-aequo winner is ex-aequo BUPT and BUPT and FITFIT with ~ with ~5 000 Billions solutions found 5 000 Billions solutions found on on ~680 workers~680 workers
• The The 1st ProActive Prize1st ProActive Prize winner is winner is Eight SamouraiEight Samourai with with ~6~6 467 Billions 467 Billions solutions found solutions found deployed on deployed on 2193 workers2193 workers
• The « Prix special du Jury » is The « Prix special du Jury » is MOAIS/KaapiMOAIS/Kaapi Calculated 8 times N=22 Queens ~21 528 Billions solutions
in 4600s (1h16mn) on 1348 Workers Computed N=22 Queens in 488s (8mn8s) And N=23 Queens ~24 233 Billions solutions in 4 415s
(1h13mn)
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies
ConclusionConclusion
Compete Next Year for the 2007 Grid Plugtest !Compete Next Year for the 2007 Grid Plugtest !
European CommissionDirectorate-General Information Society
Unit F2 – Grid Technologies