GREATER SEKHUKHUNE

DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY

PROFILE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3

1.

INTRODUCTION

4

1.1

Overview

4

1.2

Municipalities within the District

5

1.3

Political and Administrative Leadership and Seat of District

6

1.4

Political Representation

6

2.

SERVICE DELIVERY

8

2.1

Household Infrastructure

8

2.2

Sanitation

8

2.3

Water

9

2.4

Electricity

9

2.5

Refuse Removal

9

2.6

Service Provider

9

3.

AUDIT OPINIONS

9

4.

STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSESSMENT

10

4.1

Overview of findings on assessment in the Municipality

10

4.1.1

Governance

10

4.1.2

Financial Management and Viability

10

4.1.3

Service Delivery

10

5.

INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES IN TERMS OF THE MUNICIPAL TURN-AROUND STRATEGY

11

6.

MIG PROJECTS

12

7.

VULNERABILITY CLASSIFICATION

14

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality is located some distance from major towns and is characterised by a scattered pattern of human settlement. The road network links most areas, but the quality of the roads is not of a high standard, and the lack of accessibility of many areas impedes development. The rural villages lack both economic bases and services of a reasonable standard. Mushrooming of urban areas and outstanding land claims are a major cause of land shortages in the district.

The level of skills in Sekhukhune is the lowest of any district in Limpopo, and this severely hampers the district’s ability to be innovative in implementing economically productive ventures. The local economy is heavily reliant on service delivery by the government. Agriculture, construction and financial services are not fully explored.

Greater Sekhukhune has the lowest access to infrastructure amongst districts in the province. An overview of household access to infrastructure in the district shows an improvement from a low level of 36% in 1996 to 46% in 2009. The main contributor to the increase in access is electricity infrastructure. There are low levels of access to clean water in the district. Access to piped water above RDP level slightly increased from a lower level of 37% to 40% from 1996 to 2009. There are low levels of access to hygienic sanitation in the district municipality. Household access to hygienic toilets has gone up from 14% in 1996 to 23% in 2009. In 1996, household access to electricity connections was at 36%. Access has, however, increased over the years reaching 82% by 2009 and on the same par as the provincial average. Access to formal refuse removal service has been the same (5%) from 1996 to 2009 in the District Municipality

The audit outcomes of Mopani district municipality and most of the local municipalities remains poor. Fetakgomo local municipality stands out of the rest in that from 2007/8 to 2009/10 it obtained financially unqualified audit outcomes in succession.

The State of Local Government Assessment found that Sekhukhune District may not be able to meet its MDG and national target commitments as a result of huge service delivery backlog unless major improvements are done in infrastructural investment and service delivery. Available information indicates a need for R20million for refurbishment of 4 Waste Water Treatment Works in Sekhukhune District.

The Sekhukhune District Municipality Turn-Around Strategy identified inadequate water resources, huge backlog on water, sanitation, electricity, roads, waste management and inadequate funding as key basic service delivery challenges.

Four of the five local municipalities in the Greater Sekhukhune District have been classified as in the category of most vulnerable by DCoG in terms of functionality, socio-economic profile and backlog status. This profile confirms that infrastructure prioritisation in Greater Sekhukhune District should focus on addressing backlogs, more funding as well as addressing powers and functions between the district and local municipalities, and better coordination, planning and implementation.

1.INTRODUCTION

1.1Overview[footnoteRef:2] [2: Source: Gaffney’s, November 2009: Local Government in South Africa 2009 – 2011, Official Yearbook: p 915 - 917.]

In 1998 the Municipal Structures Act created cross-border municipalities. Sekhukhune District Municipality was located within both Mpumalanga and Limpopo provinces. With the 2005 municipal elections, municipal and provincial boundaries were redrawn and cross-border municipalities were abolished. All five of the constituent local municipalities are now located in Limpopo Province: Greater Tubatse, Greater Marble Hall, Elias Motsoaledi (formerly Greater Groblersdal), Fetakgomo and Makhuduthamaga. Sekhukhune District Municipality is located some distance from major towns (Pretoria, Polokwane, Nelspruit) and is characterised by a scattered pattern of human settlement. The road network links most areas, but the quality of the roads is not of a high standard, and the lack of accessibility of many areas impedes development.

Provincial growth points in the district have been identified as Burgersfort, Marble Hall and Groblersdal. Steelpoort and Jane Furse are district growth points, and municipal growth points include Mecklenberg, Driekop, Ohrigstad, Van der Merweskraal, Elandskraal, Monsterlus, Motetema, Apel and Phokwane. Just over half the population lives in these centres. The rural villages lack both economic bases and services of a reasonable standard. Mushrooming of urban areas and outstanding land claims are a major cause of land shortages in the district. Land claims need to be finalised and lack of land use management and planning must be addressed.

Although there are still massive backlogs in water and sanitation provision, there are now 68% of households with access to water at RDP standards and above. Less than one quarter of households have access to full electricity supply. The remainder use paraffin, gas or unsustainable resources. There are permitted waste disposal and landfill sites in Marble Hall, Groblersdal and Burgersfort. The site in Tubatse has reached capacity. The site in Groblersdal is not in good condition. Fetakgomo and Makhuduthamaga municipalities do not have any form of waste removal. This poses a health risk, especially as there is also no access to clean water.

Half the population is below 18 years of age and up to his age there is an equal spread of males and females in the population. Once people start working, the percentage of men drops to 40%, which indicates that large numbers of men are migrating in search of work. The illiteracy rate within the district is relatively high: almost 28% of the population has no formal education at all. This provides scope for the implementation of Adult Basic Education and Training programmes (ABET). The poor performance of schools, as measured by the matriculation pass rate, is a further great concern. As a result, the level of skills in Sekhukhune is the lowest of any district in Limpopo, and this severely hampers the district’s ability to be innovative in implementing economically productive ventures. Furthermore, unemployment is estimated at 21%.

In a province which is regarded as one of the poorest in the country, Sekhukhune District can be regarded as the ‘poorest of the poor’. Trade is negatively affected by the low employment levels. There is one provincial hospital, five community hospitals, forty-three clinics and eight mobile clinics in the district. While health facilities are evenly distributed, accessibility remains a challenge, particularly in the rural areas. The main contributors to the GP of the district are community services (52%), mining (20%) and trade (17%). The local economy is heavily reliant on service delivery by the government.

Agriculture, construction and financial services are not fully explored. Although agriculture dominates lands use, only 30% of the land is under commercial farming; the rest is subsistence farming. Scarcity of water and the status of land ownership and land claims hinder the development of the agricultural sector. Mining is the most dominant economic contributor, both directly and indirectly, for example through increased demand for housing and related infrastructure services for mine workers.

There is rail in two of the local municipalities: Greater Marble Hall and Greater Tubatse transport goods and services to the mining and agricultural sectors. There are no commercial airports in the district and only two registered airfields in Groblersdal and Marble Hall towns, which are used by the business and tourism sectors as well as local farmers for spraying cultivated fields and for emergencies.

The highest level of mining is in Tubatse, followed by Fetakgomo, with Groblersdal and Marble Hall recording the lowest activities. Currently only 35% of the potentially economically active population within the district are employed, while up to 60% of the workers are employed outside the district. This is due to a lack of local employment opportunities. Of those employed, 91.5% are in the informal sector and 8.5% in the formal sector.

The formal workforce is predominantly male, while the informal workforce consists mainly of women. Government, in the provision of community services, is the largest employer. The second biggest employer is agriculture (Groblersdal is the centre of a vast, fertile irrigated area where maize, tobacco, peanuts, vegetables, sunflower seeds and cotton are produced on a vast scale) and hunting, followed by trading activities.

1.2Municipalities within the Greater Sekhukhune District

The details of the five local municipalities within the District are tabled below:

Table 1: Statistics of the Greater Sekhukhune District and Local Municipalities

Municipalities within the District

Area (km2)

in 2009

Area (km2) after 2011

Local Government Elections & % change

Population

No. of

Households

Poverty

Rate

Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality

13,527.73

13,527.73

-

1,083,555

215,804

67.99%

Elias Motsoaledi Local Municipality

3,713.33

3,713.33

-

245,924

46,545

66.30%

Fetakgomo Local Municipality

1,104.53

1,104.53 -

-

111,524

21,713

71.07%

Greater Marble Hall Local Municipality

2,011.30

2,011.30

-

123,725

28,038

57.00%

Greater Tubatse Local Municipality

4,601.96

,601.96

-

341,302

66,192

70.16%

Makhuduthamaga Local Municipality

2,096.60

2,096.60

-

261,080

53,316

75.41%

1.3Political and Administrative Leadership and Seat of District[footnoteRef:3] [3: Source: Greater Sekhukhune DM; August 2011]

Political Leadership: Executive Mayor: Mr D Magabe

Administrative Leadership: Acting Municipal Manager: Ms M Ntshudisane

The head office of the District is located in Groblersdal.

1.4Political representation[footnoteRef:4] [4: UPDATE Aug’09: DC40 seats - ANC (88%) 21 seats, UDM (8%) 2 seats, ID (4%) 1 seat, Total 24 DC40 seats]

Table 2: Local Government Election 2006 / Provincial & National Elections 2009 comparison:

Leading Parties in the Election

Local Government Elections 2006

Provincial Elections 2009

National Elections 2009

Party

Party Votes and %

Ward Votes and %

Councillor Seats

Party

Votes and %

Party

Votes and %

Party

Seats

%

1st

ANC

154,030

85.9%

152.088

83.6%

ANC

35

87.5%

ANC

244.260

88.3%

ANC

260,348

88.6%

2nd

DA

7,357

4.1%

8.087

4.4%

AZAPO

3

7.5%

COPE

16.294

5.9%

COPE

16,389

5.6%

3rd

AZAPO

6,137

3.4%

4,387

2.4%

DA

2

5.0%

DA

5,494

2.0%

DA

5,878

2.0%

4th

PAC

5,125

2.9%

4,898

2.7%

40

PAC

1,967

0.7%

AZAPO

1,899

0.6%

Other

6,741

3.8%

12,395

6.8%

Other

Other

8,720

3.2%

Other

9,219

3.1%

Totals

179,390

100%

181,855

100%

100%

276,735

100%

293,733

100%

Figure 1: 2011 Local Government Election results and seat allocations:

The ANC is the leading party in terms of proportional DC40 Seats in Greater Sekhukhune, with 16 of 19 seats.

2.SERVICE DELIVERY[footnoteRef:5] [5: Sources: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 574 and Municipal Demarcation Board, 2008: National Report on Local Government Capacity, District and Local Municipalities, MDB Capacity Assessment, 2007/2008.]

2.1Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality Household Infrastructure

Greater Sekhukhune has the lowest access to infrastructure amongst districts in the province. An overview of household access to infrastructure in the district shows an improvement from a low level of 36% in 1996 to 46% in 2009. The main contributor to the increase in access is electricity infrastructure.

2.2Sanitation

There are low levels of access to hygienic sanitation in the district municipality. Household access to hygienic toilets has gone up from 14% in 1996 to 23% in 2009. While less than 10% of the households use flush toilets, everyone else is either using pit latrines with ventilation or those without ventilation. The improvement in access to sanitation in general in the Municipality is mainly due to the increase in the use of pit latrines which was at 75% by 2009.

2.3Water

There are low levels of access to clean water in the district. Access to piped water above RDP level slightly increased from a lower level of 37% to 40% from 1996 to 2009. Similarly, there has been an increase as well in access to piped water below RDP level and more than 20% of households are now getting this service. More than 35% of the households do not have access to clean water at all.

2.4Electricity

The increase in electricity connections is the biggest infrastructure achievement in the municipality. In 1996, household access to electricity connections was at 36%. Access has, however, increased over the years reaching 82% by 2009 and on the same par as the provincial average.

2.5Refuse removal

Access to formal refuse removal service has been the same (5%) from 1996 to 2009 in the District Municipality. While this is the case, personal refuse removal went up over the years reaching 80% by 2009. The district is rural and the low levels of formal refuse removal must be taken in the context of low settlement densities, where on-site disposal or backyard burning of waste is sometimes appropriate.

2.6Service provider

Greater Sekhukhune district does not have authority but performs the electricity reticulation function. The district, however, has authority and performs potable water and sanitation functions. The district has no authority but is also performing the refuse removal, refuse dumps and solid waste disposal function and has some capacity to do so.

3.AUDIT OPINIONS

Table 3: Audit Opinions of the District and Local Municipalities

Municipality

Audit

Opinion

2005/6

Audit Opinion

2006/7

Audit Opinion

2007/8

Audit Opinion

2008/9

Audit Opinion

2009/10

Greater Sekhukhune DM

Audit outstanding

Audit outstanding

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Elias Motsoaledi LM

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Fetakgomo LM

Adverse

Qualified

Financially unqualified with other matters

Financially unqualified with findings

Financially unqualified with no findings

Greater Marble Hall LM

Disclaimer

Adverse

Disclaimer

Greater Tubatse LM

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Qualified

Makhuduthamaga LM

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Source: Auditor-General 2009 and 2011, see www.agsa.co.za

Fetakgomo local municipality stands out of the rest in that from 2007/8 to 2009/10 it obtained financially unqualified audit outcomes in succession. Between 2005/6 and 2009/10 poor audit results have been the norm in Elias Motswoaledi and Makhuduthamaga local municipalities in that both had not improved their audit outcomes beyond disclaimers.

4.STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSESSMENT

4.1Overview of findings on assessment in the municipality

4.1.1Governance

The State of Local Government Assessment of 2009 identified a number of governance issues in Limpopo including that oversight roles and management of council secretariat needs improvement and that there is limited input on council items by traditional leaders. On public participation it was found that there are low levels of participation due to vastness of wards areas and lack of clear understanding of issues. The functionality of Ward Committees and the role and accountability of CDWs to local municipalities remain a challenge.

4.1.2Financial Management and Viability

The following were common emerging issues in terms of financial management and viability listed in the Provincial Report on Limpopo: poor revenue collection, grant dependency within municipalities, limited allocations for maintenance and operations budget, recurring audit queries which were not rectified over the years, the billing system with an unreliable data resulting in poor debt collection compounded by the high Indigent rates. In terms of financial management, Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality received a disclaimer of an audit opinion.

4.1.3Service Delivery

Service delivery issues raised in the Provincial Report includes poor planning capacity, aging infrastructure, land claims, and slow progress with achievement of MDGs. Greater Sekhukhune District may not be able to meet its MDG and national target commitments as a result of huge service delivery backlog unless major improvements are done in infrastructural investment and service delivery. Available information indicates a need for R20million for refurbishment of 4 Waste Water Treatment Works in Sekhukhune District. The role of Traditional leaders in land allocation and upgrading of land tenure rights also need to be resolved.

5.INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES OF THE MUNICIPAL TURN-AROUND STRATEGY

The Sekhukhune District Municipality identified inadequate water resources, huge backlog on water, sanitation, electricity, roads, waste management and inadequate funding as key basic service delivery challenges.

The problem statement of basic service delivery can be summarised as follows:

· The current powers and functions in the local municipalities limit effective and efficient basic service delivery.

· The equitable share/MIG transferred to the district is not sufficient to address the basic service backlog.

· The lack of proper overall co-ordination and communication on planning and implementation

The District identified as number of interventions by the District in support to local municipalities:

· Development of municipal infrastructure framework and disaster response plan

· Implement water provision in line with the recommendations of the district water team

· Resuscitate and align IGR structures for effective monitoring and oversight

· Maximise shared services within the District

Table 4: Infrastructure delivery in terms of the MTAS

Water and Sanitation

Access to Electricity

Waste Management

Municipal Actions

District speed up the implementation of water services model

District to engage DWAE to assist on getting water from JS Moroka LM

Funding to be sourced for the implementation of Moutse Water Supply Project.

District to conduct a study to confirm sanitation backlog

Eradicate the remaining backlog

Electricity network strengthened

2503 households to be reticulated

DLGH and District to engage Eskom and DME on speeding up the improvement of capacity of sub-stations

Allocate appropriate funding to fast track the implementation of Waste Management Plan

Education and awareness campaign on refuse removal conducted

6.MIG PROJECTS

Table 5: MIG projects

Municipality

Project name

Registered MIG projects

Total actual expenditure in the 2010/11 financial year on MIG funds

Project status (Registered/design/tender/construction)

Project category (e.g. water, sanitation, PMU)

Sekhukhune DM

Jane Furse Sanitation: VIP toilets

R 10,176,933.39

R1,155,189.93

Construction

Sanitation

Nkadimeng RWSS Phase 5-10

R 70,266,450.00

R 33,192,616.47

Construction

Water

Ratau Water Supply Phase 2

R 16,250,259.90

R2,113,631.83

Construction

Water

Nebo Plateau Water Supply Phase 1

R 288,000,000.00

R32,281,412.27

Construction

Water

Ga Malaka Water Supply

R 4,176,173.63

R331,832.51

Design & Tender

Water

Oliphantspoort Bulk Water supply ph6

R 106,290,000.00

R42,653,238.09

Construction

Water

Oliphantspoort Bulk Water supply ph7

R 11,226,163.68

R11,226,163.68

Construction

Water

Fetakgomo Internal Road

R 234,094,000.00

R35,441,160.10

Construction

Roads & s/water

Groblersdal/Luckau water supply

R 47,006,570.00

R12,031,434.79

Construction

Water

Moganyaka WWTW

R 4,576,504.35

R2,369,783.55

Construction

Sanitation

Cluster 1 Rural Sanitation: Provision of Environmentally Friendly Sanitation Solutions

R 18,684,884.00

R136,494.38

Construction

Sanitation

Legolaneng BWS & 8villages

R 113,702,680.00

R919,877.47

Construction

Water

Lebalelo community (Tubatse ward 10) bulk water supply for southern zone

R 65,971,362.00

R17,593,106.84

Construction

Water

Mooihoek scheme water supply

R 268,090,000.00

R69,797,285.81

Construction

Water

Moutse bulk, retic and cost recovery

R 29,912,280.00

R1,278,112.09

Design & Tender

Water

Motlailane Water Supply

R 1,160,894.00

R1,005,152.64

Design & Tender

Water

Sekwati Water Supply Project Phases 2 and 3

R 23,867,758.20

 

Construction

Water

Nebo Plateau Sub project 4: Carbonatites to Zaaiplaas

 

R -

Design & Tender

Water

Morgenzon Water Supply

R 3,275,757.00

R 1,588,156.21

Design & Tender

Water

Ga Motshana Water Supply

R 2,629,403.00

R1,833,311.46

Design & Tender

Water

PMU Sekhukhune DM

R18,492,385.99

R5,703,540.89

No status

PMU

Elias Motsoaledi LM

Moutse Area - Phucukane access road upgrading and stormwater control

R 6,777,756.00

R704,074.26

Completed

Roads & s/water

Moteti B Bus road Upgrading

R 10,583,993.33

R4,360,031.50

Completed

Roads & s/water

Ramogwerane to Nkadimeng Road Ph3

R 20,109,587.34

R9,427,925.99

Construction

Roads & s/water

Monsterlus to Mmakgopheng road phase 2

R 23,284,785.37

R9,128,577.15

Completed

Roads & s/water

PMU Elias Motsoaledi LM

R3,375,211.58

R829,784.20

No status

PMU

Fetakgomo LM

Malogeng Waste Disposal Site

R 2,500,000.00

 

Completed

solid waste disposal site

Fetakgomo Municipal Offices

R 8,500,000.00

R4,160,919.58

Construction

Municipal Offices

Apel Recreational Park

R 1,700,000.00

R694,483.09

Construction

Sports facilities

Fetakgomo Pendestrain Walkways

R 3,500,000.00

R831,519.42

Construction

Roads & s/water

Atok Thusong Centre Paving

R 1,100,000.00

 

Completed

multi purpose community halls

Fetakgomo High Mast Lights

R 3,850,000.00

R2,545,254.76

Construction

Street / Community Lighting

Fetakgomo Sports Complex

R 6,500,000.00

R3,790,751.52

Construction

Sports facilities

Mohlaletsi Thusong Service Centre

R 8,900,000.00

R370,015.09

Design & Tender

multi purpose community halls

Strydkraal Community Hall

R 4,100,000.00

R -

Design & Tender

multi purpose community halls

PMU Fetakgomo LM

R 610,047.62

R439,640.86

No status

PMU

Tubatse LM

Mareseleng Small Access Bridge

R 9,100,000.00

R5,506,215.38

Completed

Roads & s/water

Tjate Community Hall

R 4,350,000.00

R821,800.58

Completed

multi purpose community halls

Gaphala to Modubeng Access Road

R 4,400,000.00

R3,402,208.78

Completed

Roads & s/water

Kampeng Access Bridge

R 9,800,000.00

R3,376,685.05

Completed

Roads & s/water

Bugersfort Internal Road

R 10,560,000.00

R4,558,009.13

Construction

Roads & s/water

Ribacross to Gariba access bridge

R 3,520,000.00

R106,840.80

Completed

Roads & s/water

Practiseer Internal Roads and Stormwater

R 13,200,000.00

R3,929,362.63

Design & Tender

Roads & s/water

Bothashoek access road

R 4,500,000.00

R3,471,713.54

Completed

Roads & s/water

Moeng Community Hall

R 3,000,000.00

R2,680,684.23

Construction

multi purpose community halls

PMU Tubatse LM

R3,906,252.99

R1,596,176.23

No status

PMU

Makhuduthamaga LM

Tshela Internal roads

R 11,336,748.00

R1,074,817.50

Completed

Roads & s/water

Kutupu Roads & stormwater

R 22,498,305.00

R5,552,198.98

Completed

Roads & s/water

Vierfontein to Rietfontein Link Road

R 25,009,000.00

R3,691,356.47

Completed

Roads & s/water

Moretsele Access Road

R 12,944,312.00

R1,569,325.96

Completed

Roads & s/water

Phokwane Road and Stromwater

R 15,628,705.82

R10,511,812.00

Construction

Roads & s/water

Hlalanikahle Internal Roads

R 8,520,178.25

R4,122,776.95

Construction

Roads & s/water

Access Road to Water Treatment Works - Riverside

R 2,944,000.00

R460,564.70

Design & Tender

Roads & s/water

Construction of Madibong Road and Stormwater

R 10,066,314.00

R373,350.35

Design & Tender

Roads & s/water

PMU Makhuduthamaga LM

R 3,922,671.93

R1,413,744.84

No status

PMU

Source: All MIG projects, 2011 June

Sekhukhune district, Elias Motsoaledi, Fetakgomo, Tubatse and Makhuduthamaga submitted their reports on MIG projects for the month of June 2011. In all the reports the signature of the accounting officer was missing. These MIG reports show that Sekhukhune district, Elias Motsoaledi, Fetakgomo, Tubatse and Makhuduthamaga have not reported on the status quo of their Project Management Units. In Sekhukhune projects are predominantly about water and most are at a construction phase. There are five projects in Elias Motsoaledi of which four are about roads and water. Of the five projects in Elias Motsoaledi three have been completed. Fetakgomo has a mix of projects ranging from building of municipal offices to construction of community halls, and most are already under construction. In Tubatse most projects are about roads and water and most of the projects have been completed. Like in Tubatse, most projects are about roads and water in Makhuduthamaga.

7.VULNERABILITY CLASSIFICATION

The DCoG Municipal Spatial Classification System was designed to develop municipal profiles according to spatial location, based upon results from indicator sets on functionality, socio-economic profile and backlog status. Its purpose is to inform a differentiated approach to municipalities.

The four municipal classifications developed by DCoG are:

Class 1: Most vulnerable (57 local municipalities)

Class 2: Second most vulnerable (58 local municipalities)

Class 3: Second highest performing (58 local municipalities)

Class 4: Highest performing (58 local municipalities)

The five local municipalities in the Greater Sekhukhune District can be classified as follow:

Table 6: Vulnerability Classification

Local Municipality

Classification

Elias Motsoaledi

Most vulnerable

Fetakgomo

Most vulnerable

Greater Marble Hall

Second most vulnerable

Greater Tubatse

Most vulnerable

Makhuduthamaga

Most vulnerable

From this table it is evident that four of the five local municipalities in the Greater Sekhukhune District fall into the most vulnerable category.

Household Infrastructure Overview

LIM - DC47 Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality

LIM - DC47 Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820090.355959317454029310.371136383178397310.381220391160271570.390755465655929110.396642520182485140.402833696612348520.410671778649017880.419002754912450430.424354813755266680.430435075506593770.439286622071365320.444952504329510610.448653019681918840.45679533049447124South Africa199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820090.61541456060687660.621660645262867130.62497189113410290.627430346213298630.629979798343102360.63358022349889520.638377916516666640.64391251146377870.649380209078432640.654777001439606150.662604459137000720.672527903058500740.680986744366409490.68920143291886371

Index

8