department of education performance management › legislature › documents › 062016-pc.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Department of EducationPerformance Management
Presented to Legislative Planning Committee
June 20, 2016
![Page 2: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Strategic Planning
Clarifying outcomes,Reallocating resources,Using data, andHolding everyone accountable.
![Page 3: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Looking at Assessment Data
Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Gr. 6 Gr. 7 Gr. 8 Gr. 112015 47.65 44.44 47.77 44.51 48.44 47.33 59.712016 50.57 50.24 50.2 51.38 52.39 53.09 60.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Smarter Balanced: English/Language Arts Percent Proficient
2015
2016
![Page 4: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Looking at Assessment Data
Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Gr. 6 Gr. 7 Gr. 8 Gr. 112015 50.23 44.47 36.18 33.79 38.59 38.12 38.772016 54.03 48.5 38.18 40.97 42.63 41.95 37.87
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Smarter Balanced: Mathematics Percent Proficient
2015
2016
![Page 5: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Proficiency Growth All Students
40.13
48.19
43.63
52.36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Math ELA
Percent Proficient ‐ All Students
2015
2016
![Page 6: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Proficiency Growth Native Americans
12.42
19.4518.21
26.19
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Math ELA
Percent Proficient ‐ American Indian students
2015
2016
![Page 7: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
All Students College, Career and Life Ready
Students Enter 4th Grade proficient or advanced in math
![Page 9: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
English/Language Arts Grade 3 – 2015 & 16
2015
20160.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
Native American StudentsNon‐Native American StudentsAll Students
![Page 10: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
English/Language Arts Grade 3 – 2015 & 16
** Students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 on state test
2015 Preliminary 2016
Number of Students Tested
Proficiency Rate
Number of Students Tested
Proficiency Rate
Native American Students 1196 17.81% 1911 25.69%
Non‐Native American Students 8839 53.00% 8683 56.04%All Students 10035 48.81% 10594 50.57%
![Page 11: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
English/Language Arts2016 Targets
Number of
Students Tested Proficiency Rate
2016 Target *
GRADE 3
Native American Students 1911 25.69% 24.66%
Non‐Native American Students 8683 56.04% 56.92%
All Students 10594 50.57% 53.08%*Based on reducing, by half, the percent of students scoring at Levels 1 and 2 of the state assessment in six years
![Page 12: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
All Students College, Career and Life Ready
Students Enter 9th grade proficient or advanced in math
![Page 13: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Math Grade 8 – 2015 & 2016
2015
2016
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
50.00%
Native American StudentsNon‐Native American
Students All Students
2015
2016
![Page 14: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Math ‐ Grade 8 2015 & 2016
2015 Preliminary 2016
Number of Students Tested
Proficiency Rate
Number of Students Tested
Proficiency Rate
Native American Students 1047 11.56% 1504 15.82%Non‐Native American Students 8011 42.87% 7848 46.95%
All Students 9058 39.25% 9352 41.95%
![Page 15: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
8th Grade Math2016 Targets
2016
Number of Students Tested
Proficiency Rate 2016 Target*
Native American Students 1504 15.82% 18.93%
Non‐Native American Students 7846 46.97% 47.63%All Students 9352 41.95% 44.31%*Based on reducing, by half, the percent of students scoring at Levels 1 and 2 of the state assessment in six years
![Page 16: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
All Students College, Career and Life Ready
High School GraduatesPost‐Secondary and Career
Ready
![Page 17: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Workforce Readiness (NCRC)
National Career Readiness Certificate (NCRC)2013 2014 2015 2016
# of Students Completing WorkKeys tests 1,500 2,055 2,624 3,665% of Students Earning Certificate 91.73% 91.78% 92.80% 93.86%
![Page 18: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Workforce Readiness (NCRC) 2016 Targets
2016 Targets****
# of Students Completing WorkKeys tests 3,665 3560
% of Students Earning Certificate 93.86% 93.40%
**** Based on student participation growing in a linear fashion, and on decreasing, by half, the percent of student not earning NCRC certificates in six years
![Page 19: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
College ReadinessACT Benchmark Data
2013 2014 2015 Preliminary 2016
Number of Students Testing
RateNumber of Students Testing
RateNumber of Students Testing
RateNumber of Students Testing
Rate
Percent Meeting Math Cut Score of 20
Native American Students 260 35.38% 312 33.97% 318 35.53% 305 27.54%
Non‐Native American Students 5496 69.67% 5536 68.89% 5546 69.02% 5455 67.68%
All Students 5756 68.12% 5848 67.03% 5864 67.21% 5760 65.56%
Percent Meeting English Cut Score of 18
Native American Students 260 45.38% 312 46.79% 318 46.86% 305 40.98%
Non‐Native American Students 5496 78.17% 5536 76.91% 5546 77.41% 5455 76.24%
All Students 5756 76.69% 5848 75.31% 5864 75.75% 5760 74.38%
![Page 20: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Percent of Prior Year Graduating Class Meeting ACT Benchmark in Math
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
2013 2014 2015 2016
Native American Students
Non‐Native American Students
All Students
![Page 21: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Percent of Prior Year Graduating Class Meeting ACT Benchmark in ELA
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
2013 2014 2015 2016
Native American Students
Non‐Native American Students
All Students
![Page 22: Department of Education Performance Management › legislature › documents › 062016-PC.pdf · 2016-06-20 · Department of Education Performance Management Presented to Legislative](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022041022/5ed3e20b6ffd1803211f87e8/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
College Readiness2016 ACT Targets
# of Students% Meeting Benchmark 2016 Target ***
Percent Meeting Math Cut Score of 20
Native American Students 305 27.54% 40.91%
Non‐Native American Students 5455 67.68% 71.60%
All Students 5760 65.56% 69.94%
Percent Meeting English Cut Score of
18
Native American Students 305 40.98% 51.28%
Non‐Native American Students 5455 76.24% 79.29%
All Students 5760 74.38% 77.77%***Based on reducing, by half, the percent of students not meeting the established ACT cut scores