design report - auckland council · page | 5 urban design & visual assessment history the area...
TRANSCRIPT
D E S I G N R E P O R T
15 September 2017
Proposed development at
43-45 Mt Eden Road
for Anscot Property Ltd
Introduction 3
The Site 4
History 5
The Proposal 6
Current Context 7
Street Elevations 8
Future Context 9
Deisgn Response 10
Upper Symonds St Special Character Overlay 11
Aerial Views 15
Building Height 16
Shadowing 16
Visual Impact Assessment 16
Locality Plans & Viewpoints 17
Conclusion 23
C O N T E N T S
Location Plan
Page | 3
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
I N T R O D U C T I O N
It is proposed to construct an 8-level mixed-use development on the site at 43-45 Mt Eden
Road in Eden Terrace, covering almost the whole site. The development contains parking
for 15 cars, two retail / commercial tenancies and 15 apartments.
The apartments include 1, 2 and 3 bedroom types, plus a larger apartment on the top floor.
This report looks at the urban context, both existing and planned, into which the proposed
development is to be inserted, and considers the interaction of the proposal with the Upper
Symonds Street character overlay incorporated in the Unitary Plan.
The report also looks at the visual impact the development will have from surrounding
viewpoints.
While the proposed development generally complies with the Unitary Plan rules, there are
some areas of non-compliance. Most significantly from an urban design viewpoint, the
building complies with the Plan’s maximum height rule when viewed frontally from Mt Eden
Road but, because of the site’s topography, it is over the height limit as viewed from vantage
points to the south and west. This report considers the sun shadowing and visual impact
of the proposal when compared to a hypothetical development complying with the height
rule.
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 4
T H E S I T E
The site is located in the long-established inner city
suburb of Eden Terrace, although the other side of
Mt Eden Rd is often referred to as Grafton, with the
former Grafton Library (now Galbraiths ) a prominent
heritage feature near the site.
The site slopes moderately steeply to the west down
from Mt Eden Road to Shaddock Street, with a public
walkway linking the two running down the slope
along the site’s northern edge. The site is currently
occupied by a solid brick two-storey building, a
carpark to the rear of the building, and a sloping part
paved/part grassed strip which was formerly part of
Shaddock Street. The building is currently occupied
by Quinovic Property Management as tenant. The
rear carpark is accessed via a right-of-way from Mt
Eden Road across the neighbouring property at
47 Mt Eden Rd. This right-of-way has some legal
status, but is poorly documented and the proposed
development does not make use of it.
Auckland Transport have designated a frontage strip
2.2 metres wide along the Mt Eden Road frontage
for road-widening; Designation 1616.
While this section of Mt Eden Road is included in the
Upper Symonds Street character overlay, the current
building and its immediate neighbours are of mostly
indifferent quality. To the north, on the other side
of the public walkway, is a three storey apartment
building (1990’s era) with two parking basements.
This building, with a plaster-finished exterior, solid
timber balcony balustrading and mansard roof, does
not make a noteworthy contribution to the area’s
character. To the south, a single storey building,
also plastered and with a small basement covers
only part of the site, and is currently in use as an
architect’s office.
To the west of the site, down on Shaddock Street,
there is a mix of large single-storey warehouse
structures, some two-storey commercial
development, and a four storey apartment building
on the north side of the street. Further along
Shaddock Street beyond Flower Street, all buildings
are scheduled for demolition as part of the CRL Mt
Eden Station project.
On the other side of Mt Eden Road, the Cityside
Church directly opposite the site is a significant
local landmark. Of timber-gothic style and clad
in weatherboards, this church and spire strongly
influence the character of this short section of Mt
Eden Road. The proposal is approximately the same
height as the top of the spire.
The site from Burleigh St across Mt Eden Rd The site on Mt Eden Rd, walkway down to Shaddock St Rear of existing building The site from Shaddock St
Page | 5
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
H I S T O R YThe area around the intersection of Symonds
Street, Khyber Pass, Newton Road has a long
history of human occupation as a key node
between the Maori settlement on Mangawhau
and the harbour foreshore. It is a highpoint in
the vicinity, with all five major roads meeting
there sloping downwards away from it. In the
case of Mt Eden Road, it slopes gently down
from the Symonds St / Khyber Pass ridge to
the low-point of the basin (between the ridge
and Mangawhau) where the North Auckland
Rail Line (opened 1881) now runs and Mt Eden
station is located. It then rises to the south and
traverses the lower slopes of the mountain
itself before passing through Mt Eden Village.
In early days, Mt Eden Rd was tolled, as the
residential suburb was sub-divided into large
lots in the 1870’s. Increasing population of the
area led to the building of the tram line along
Mt Eden Rd in the early 1900’s.
The area immediately around the site started
as residential, with more industrial uses
(such as the Colonial Ammunition Co and the
Henderson and Pollard timber mill) around the
rail line further down the slope. The retail /
commercial activity on upper Symonds St was
intensive in the first half of the 20th century,
and this activity spread down New North and
Mt Eden Roads. Early photos show a timber
cottage on the site, with the current brick
structure probably constructed in the 1920’s
for commercial use.
Local landmarks include Grafton Library, by
architect Edward Bartley, opened in 1913, and
the Cityside Baptist Church (opposite the site)
which was opened in 1906, having been re-
built after the widening of Mt Eden Road for
the tramlines a couple of years before.
The remainder of the buildings in the character
overlay area generally consist of two-storey
Edwardian retail with residential above typical
of all the inner Auckland villages, generally of
brick masonry construction.
The connection of Shaddock Street to Mt
Eden Rd appears to have always been a
pedestrian connection only, as there is no sign
of paving on the centre strip of the previously
designated roadway. The road was stopped
and amalgamated with the site in the 1980’s.
Mt Eden Rd in the early 1900’s and now, site circled
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 6
T H E P R O P O S A LThe proposed development is an eight level building with these uses:
Basement 2: (Shaddock Street level)
Parking for seven cars accessed directly off Shaddock St, and a car-lift to take cars up to Basement 1. Also a separate garage for one car associated with the level 5 apartment.
Basement 1: (mid-level between Mt Eden Rd and Shaddock St)
Parking for a further seven cars, accessed via the car-lift, plus storage lockers for each apartment. There is therefore one carpark per apartment, although it is probable some one-bedroom apartments will
be sold with no carpark in order to allocate at least 2 carparks to the commercial tenancy.
Ground: (Mt Eden Rd level)
The main entrance to the apartments’ lobby, providing lift and stair access to all levels. Also a commercial retail / commercial tenancy with frontage to Mt Eden Road. The type of use intended is similar to
that currently existing on the site – primarily an office use but with a strong public interface.
To the west side of the floor, there are a one-bedroom and a two-bedroom apartment.
Level 1: (Podium level)
One one-bedroom and two two-bedroom apartments.
Levels 2, 3, 4: (Typical floors)
One of each of one-bedroom, two-bedroom and three-bedroom apartments.
Level 5: (Top floor)
One larger apartment with roof deck – 2 bedrooms and artist’s studio.
Page | 7
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
C U R R E N T C O N T E X TThe area surrounding the site is
predominantly low-rise, with mostly two-
storey buildings of around 8 to 12 metres
height, built to the street edge and housing
a wide variety of uses. The main exceptions
to the predominant height are the 14
storey former Winstone Building (now Skhy
Apartments) on Khyber Pass, which is a
landmark for the area, along with the tall
spire of Church of the Holy Sepulchre also
on the Khyber Pass ridge.
The line of Edwardian-era heritage buildings
along the western side of Upper Symonds
Street, which extends down the first two
blocks of the west side of Mt Eden Road,
is a significant grouping of these buildings.
The eastern side of both streets (south of
the Khyber Pass intersection) also contain
significant heritage buildings, including
Galbraiths and the Cityside Church
previously mentioned. All these areas
are included in the Upper Symonds Street
Character Overlay in the Unitary Plan. The
site is also included, although neither the
building on the site or its neighbours to
either side have heritage significance.
The stretch of Mt Eden Road between
Symonds Street and Boston Road past the
site is an important gateway to the suburb
of Mt Eden. As one moves down the slope,
the shallow valley between the Symonds
Street Ridge and Mangawhau is gradually
revealed with Mangawhau appearing as
a particularly dramatic element on the far
side of the valley. This view is protected by
the E18 viewshaft, which crosses the front
of the site and limits building bulk on Mt
Eden Road to a single storey height, with
floors above that height required to be set
back to preserve the view beyond them to
Mangawhau.
The street character of this section of Mt
Eden Rd is mixed. On the western side in the
top block (Symonds Street to Nikau Street),
the two storey masonry retail buildings
from the Edwardian era are intact and
continuous along the street frontage, well
maintained and sought-after as premises
for, mostly, food and drinks uses. In the
lower block where the site is located (Nikau
Street to Boston Road), there is a variety of
more modern buildings of 1, 2, and 3 storey
heights employing a mix of architectural
styles and accommodating mixed uses, with
a return to the Edwardian retail typology
opposite the Boston Road intersection.
On the eastern side, the streetscape is very
different, with the two landmark buildings
(Galbraiths and Cityside Church) dominating
the block frontage, with significant gaps
elsewhere in the street wall. The gap at
the Symonds Street intersection is the
large carpark at the newly-coloured water
reservoir. The gap at the south is the angled
intersection of Burleigh Street, which
effectively merges with the Boston Road
intersection to form a large break in the
street-wall. The buildings between the two
landmark buildings are recessive, forming
an effective gap, but the quiet mid-century
modern architecture of the Watercare
building is worth noting.
Overall, the street containment in this block
is quite strong, and the buildings lining it on
both sides, while exhibiting a wide variety
of architectural styles, are all moderately
to strongly textured. Combined with the
view to Mangawhau to the south, there is a
strong sense of place in the area.
In regard to the Shaddock Street frontage of
the site, the existing streetscape is set for
radical change as the CRL project proceeds
over the next five years.
Eden Terrace viewed from Mangawhau, with site circled
Context diagram
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 8
S T R E E T E L E V A T I O N S : M T E D E N R D
New
Nor
th R
d
Nik
au S
t
Prop
osal
Symonds St
City Side C
hurch
Burleigh St
Galbraiths
Boston R
d
EAST S IDE
WEST S IDE
Page | 9
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
F U T U R E C O N T E X T
It is likely that the Mt Eden Road block, to which the site fronts,
will remain more-or-less as existing due to the heritage attributes
of many of the buildings. It is possible that some of the gaps in the
heritage streetscape could be filled by selective new development.
The Powerstation and the building to its south at 37 Mt Eden Rd are
possible candidates for redevelopment, as is the Unique Fabrics site
on the opposite side of the road from the site. Nevertheless, the
overall streetscape on this block is likely to remain similar to its current
condition for the medium term.
The streetscape of Shaddock Street will, as mentioned above, change
radically. The apartment block on the north side of the street will
probably remain, but the remaining buildings west of the Flower Street
intersection, which are mostly large-format warehouse structures with
some two storey offices, will be demolished as part of the CRL project,
and a new streetscape will be established. Some material from AT
hints at what the future neighbourhood around the new Mt Eden train
station may look like, but the only certainty is that the new buildings
will be taller than those there at present.
The siteProposed Mt Eden train station
Screenshots from AT video 2014
Top: Location of the proposed Mt Eden train station
Bottom: CCMP vision for the Eden Terrace area
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 10
D E S I G N R E S P O N S EThe proposed building contains uses
appropriate to the area, both as it is currently
and for its proposed future state. The building
is shaped to a large extent by the bulk and
location controls for the zone. In particular,
the E18 viewshaft which determines that the
taller part of the building is well set back from
the ground floor, has led to a clear division of
base, middle and top. Additionally, the Level
1 has been set back inside the line of the
typical upper floors to create a more defined
break between base and middle. The top is
also very different to the typical middle floors,
incorporating sloping roofs, different materials
and large setbacks. The overall tone of the
building is highly residential / domestic, with
articulation of balconies, the use of timber for
soffits and balcony screening, and a strongly
shaped roofline.
The division of the building into base, middle
and top has led to a horizontal emphasis to the
middle section, employing expressed floor slab
edges and floor to ceiling windows alternating
with solid panels. Early studies of a vertical
emphasis to the middle section of the building,
employing punched windows in predominantly
vertical panels, led to the conclusion that
the middle section (4 floors in height) is
not sufficiently tall to express a convincing
verticality.
The plan places vertical circulations on the
southern boundary, with a necessarily tall
windowless wall along much of this boundary.
Efforts to integrate the property at 47 Mt Eden
Road into the development to achieve a larger
floor-plate with an internal vertical core were
not successful.
The planning of the typical floor provides a
range of sizes across the three apartments,
each of a reasonably large area with a balcony
receiving good sun for several hours a day. The
possibility of a tall building on the western
boundary at 2 Shaddock Street has been
allowed for, as the balcony of the one bedroom
apartments will still get good sun and outlook.
The balconies of the two and three bedroom
apartments overlook streets, and therefore
have a protected outlook and access for sun.
These main external materials are used to clad
the building:
1: Vertically ribbed concrete panels to the
south elevation, and wrapping around onto the
east and west elevations.
2: A dark brick cladding to the lower floors, to
form a visually-solid base.
3: Steel web-grating, powder coated, to
openings into the carpark levels.
4: Glazed panels on the middle section of the
building. Most of these will be clear vision
panels, but there will also be some opaque
panels which will be a high-quality textured
ceramic panel such as Neolith, in a woodgrain
finish.
5: Fins to partially enclose the balconies on
levels 2,3 and 4, fabricated from a sheet
product such as Trespa to give a light woodgrain
appearance to match the soffits.
6: Ribbed coloursteel standing seam roofing
and wall cladding to top floor.
7: Natural timber, stained, as soffit and fascia
lining on both the ground and top floors.
The materials proposed are intended
to reinforce the division of the building
described above, as well as having traditional
domestic associations, visually expressing the
predominant use of the building.
View from Mt Eden Rd
View from Shaddock St
Page | 11
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
U P P E R S Y M O N D S S T R E E T S P E C I A L C H A R A C T E R O V E R L A Y1: Demolition of the existing building.
The Unitary Plan, through this overlay, seeks
to protect the special character of the Upper
Symonds Street area. It therefore places
requirements on applications to demolish
character-defining and character-supporting
buildings. The existing building falls into
neither of these categories, so the policy
related to its demolition is D18.3.11, which
simply discourages the demolition of buildings
that contribute to the continuity or coherence
of the special character area.
The assessment criteria, which are set out in
D18.8.2.2 (1) are (in italics), followed by our
commentary:
(i) whether the proposal significantly adversely
affects the built special character of the area,
including the contribution the individual
building makes to the context, character or
cohesiveness of the streetscape;
The existing building is an un-decorated single
storey (as viewed from Mt Eden Road) masonry
structure with a hip roof of metal and ordinary
window openings. It does not possess great
architectural qualities, apart from a certain
solidity derived from its plastered solid brick
construction. The street activation and
transparency of the frontage was improved in a
recent renovation, but is still not ideal. The style
of the building is not repeated in the architecture
of its neighbours, nor indeed anywhere in the
special character area. The building next door
at 47 Mt Eden Road is, like this one, single
storied as viewed from the street, but they are
the only single storey buildings in the whole
line of character buildings down this side of
Mt Eden Road. The predominant character
the overlay seeks to preserve is generally a tall
two-storey Edwardian architecture, and this
building is certainly not that.
(ii) the contribution the building makes to
adjoining or nearby scheduled buildings
and other character defining or supporting
buildings or to the wider character area where
there are no identified character supporting or
character defining buildings, either through the
context and the relationship of the building or
through the building’s mass, height or rhythm
of façades;
We do not consider the existing building
contributes in any significant way to the
character area. The mass, height and horizontal
character of the front façade are not consistent
with the character-supporting or character-
defining buildings.
(iii) whether the existing building forms part
of a cohesive group of buildings in terms of
similarity of age, scale, proportion or design and
the extent to which the building’s demolition
or partial demolition would detract from the
contribution that group makes to streetscape,
the special character and context of the area;
The building is not part of a cohesive group of
buildings.
(iv) whether the building is beyond rehabilitation
to a state which would display its special
qualities, architectural qualities or special
characteristics of the streetscape and the
surrounding area;
The building is not dilapidated, but it is an
earthquake risk and is nearing the end of its
useful life.
(v) whether the costs of restoration and repair
are significantly greater in comparison to
the costs of a new building of similar size and
quality.
Given the Unitary Plan’s vision for the area, a
new building of similar size is unrealistic and,
in our view, undesirable. The building does not
possess a quality worthy of replication.
2: The proposed building.
The new building is required to take into
account the expectations set out in the
Unitary Plan in respect of this overlay. The
policy (D18.3) requires new buildings “which
are within the overlay but are not character
defining or character supporting buildings, to
maintain the integrity of the context of the area
by providing quality design, materials, colour
and decoration which respects and enhances
the built form and streetscape of the area.”
The requirements for new buildings in the
overlay area are further described in D18.8.2.2
(4). This clause refers back to the policy
quoted above, and then goes on to require an
assessment of whether aspects of the proposal:
i) are appropriate when considered against the relevant assessment criteria for new buildings or alterations or additions in the zone;
The assessment criteria, which are set out
in H13.8.1(3) are (in italics), followed by our
commentary:
(a) the design and appearance of buildings in so
far as it affects the existing and future amenity
values of public streets and spaces used by
significant numbers of people. This includes:
(i) the contribution that such buildings make to
the attractiveness pleasantness and enclosure
of the public space;
As will be seen from the street elevations,
the proposed building is taller than any of
its neighbours. This is consistent with the
future planned context of the area set out in
the Unitary Plan. In respect of the proposed
building as viewed from Mt Eden Road, the
non-compliance with the maximum height
rule will be barely perceptible. Therefore we
conclude that the height of the proposed
building does not, in itself, adversely affect the
special character and amenity of the area.
Beyond that, we consider a taller building in
this location is an appropriate response to the
church spire on the other side of the road, and
the ‘gateway’ character of this section of Mt
Eden Road previously described.
We therefore conclude that the proposed
building makes a positive contribution to the
streetscape in terms of visual interest and
enclosure.
(ii) the maintenance or enhancement of amenity
for pedestrians using the public space or street;
The proposed building is more open and glazed
to Mt Eden Road than the existing building
on the site, and is of higher quality materials.
Additionally the proposed building is set back
2.2 metres from Mt Eden Road when compared
to the existing situation. A seat for the public
is provided at the intersection of Mt Eden
Road and the walkway to Shaddock Street. We
conclude that the new building will enhance
the amenity of the area for pedestrians.
(iii) the provision of convenient and direct access
between the street and building for people of all
ages and abilities
There is level, accessible entrance to all parts of
the building’s ground floor, and a lift serves all
levels from there.
(iv) measures adopted for limiting the adverse
visual effects of any blank walls along the
frontage of the public space
While the Mt Eden Road frontage is almost fully
glazed to reveal activity within, this has been
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 12
much harder to achieve on the sloping walkway
connecting Mt Eden Road to Shaddock Street.
The solution adopted for the walkway façade is
to kink the wall in plan so that a shallow triangle
for landscaping is created. This will allow vines
to be planted that will climb the blank sections
of the brickwork, and for low-level ground-cover
plants alongside the walkway. The possibility of
a taller specimen tree in this space will also be
investigated, keeping in mind CPTED issues.
Additionally we will provide a large square
window from Basement 1 level onto the lower
part of the walkway. While this window is into
a carpark level, we propose to install a light-
emitting artwork installation in this window to
break up the large blank wall.
The cladding of these walls, and those fronting
onto Shaddock Street, in brick is also some
compensation for the lack of actual activation
on these frontages, since the warmth and
scale of brick gives a much more pleasant wall
surface than walls of, say, concrete block or
lightweight claddings.
(v) the effectiveness of screening of car parking
and service areas from the view of people using
the public space
All carparking and servicing of the building is
contained within the basements, not in view of
the public.
(b) the provision of floor to floor heights that
will provide the flexibility of the space to be
adaptable to a wide variety of use over time.
The vertical dimension from ground floor to
level 1 is 3.5 metres, which will allow a ceiling
height in the ground floor of around 2.8
metres, or more if there is a specific ceiling (or
no-ceiling) solution. This will allow for a wide
variety of retail-type uses.
(c) the extent of glazing provided on walls
fronting public streets and public spaces and
the benefits it provides in terms of:
(i) the attractiveness and pleasantness of the
public space and the amenity for people using
or passing through that space;
(ii) the degree of visibility that it provides
between the public space and the building
interior; and
(iii) the opportunities for passive surveillance of
the street from the ground floor of buildings;
Refer to the comments above, and following in
section (e) below.
(d) the provision of verandahs to provide
weather protection in areas used, or likely to be
used, by significant numbers of pedestrians;
Although not required, a 1.5m canopy
projection is provided along the Mt Eden
Road frontage. This has Auckland Transport’s
approval for the provision of a structure within
the road-widening designation.
(e) the application of Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design principles to the design
and layout of buildings adjoining public spaces.
The Mt Eden Road frontage, with its full glazing
to the public footpath and minimal recesses
Page | 13
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
service lanes on the matters listed above
No new roads or service lanes are being created.
(g) the positive effects that landscaping,
including required landscaping, on sites
adjoining public spaces is able to contribute
to the amenity values of the people using or
passing through the public space
The available places for landscaping will be
intensively developed for a high quality green
landscape. These consist of the two ends of the
road widening strip along Mt Eden Road (small
areas of around 6 sq.m each), the triangle of
land formed by the splayed widening of the
walkway (around 13 sq.m), and the substantial
planter along the whole frontage at Level 1.
The planter and access to it will be retained
in body corporate ownership to ensure a high
level of on-going maintenance.
(h) taking an integrated stormwater
management approach
There is little potential for on-site stormwater
treatment, although the planters at Levels 1
and 5 will assist in delaying run-off.
(i) all the above matters to be assessed having
regard to the outcomes set out in this Plan and
the functional requirements of the activities that
the buildings are intended to accommodate;
Overall, we consider a high level of design
effort has been applied to produce a building
that meets the intentions of the Plan.
for entries, combined with good lighting, will
present no particular CPTED issues. The small
areas of planting at each end will be carefully
considered to avoid introducing any such issues.
We have taken care to consider CPTED issues
when considering the interface of the building
with the walkway down to Shaddock Street.
While we want to give more space to this
walkway than just the narrow legal width,
we do not want to provide notched widening
that would provide potential places for people
to hide. The solution has been a splayed
widening of the walkway space that effectively
foreshortens the visual length of the walkway,
allows for a clear view from end to end, and
allows for some low-level landscaping around
its mid-point.
It is also proposed to provide good night
illumination to the walkway from the new
building, and this will be specifically designed
into the proposal.
There are also some CPTED issues with the
garage entrances off Shaddock Street, which,
given the lack of occupied space at this
level, are hard to avoid. Nevertheless we’ve
taken care not to have any recesses or wing-
walls that may provide hiding places, and the
lighting scheme will extend to this area as well.
Overlooking of this area is provided from the
apartment balconies above, both from the
proposed building and the neighbour on the
north side of the walkway.
(f) the effects of creation of new roads and/or
Returning now to the remaining items in
Section D18.8.2.2 (4), assessment is also
required against these clauses:
(ii) reflect and have regard to the special character statement for the area;
The site is not a large site in the context of
other sites in the area, and the scale of the
development proposal does not disrupt the
high-density, fine-grained urban form. The
building to the street and the avoidance of
vehicle crossings from Mt Eden Rd further
preserves the established pattern for the
overlay area.
We consider the proposed building makes a
positive contribution to the quality of the area
through its thoughtful design, articulation
and materials choices. As previously noted, a
characteristic of the Edwardian architecture
which the overlay seeks to maintain is a
solidity and texture derived from the masonry
construction and applied decoration. It is
not considered appropriate to replicate this
character in a literal sense by using masonry
and applied decorative elements. However,
in a modern way, we have respected the
character of the area by using a brick base to
the building, and richly texturing and modelling
the upper floors. The brick base, in particular,
resonates with the masonry construction of the
Edwardian buildings.
The expressed sloping roof form is not a
characteristic of other buildings in the overlay
area, with the notable exception of the church
opposite. The sloping roofs and timber soffits
of the proposal relate to the roof-shape and
materials used in the church, introducing
texture and modulation that compliments the
more traditional architecture.
(iii) are designed to respond positively to the architectural form, bulk, proportions, materials and colour of any existing buildings on the site and/or any surrounding scheduled historic heritage place, character-defining or character-supporting buildings
For the reasons stated in (ii) above, we consider
the proposal meets the requirement. The main
response is to the Church opposite the site, as
noted in the above point.
(iv) are designed to respond positively to the built form characteristics and urban structure of the special character area
Our positive response to the built form
characteristics is noted above.
This proposal occupies a traditional small single
site, and therefore the ability to positively
change (rather than just maintain) the urban
structure of the area is restricted.
However, some further commentary on the
walkway between Mt Eden Rd and Shaddock St
is warranted. The importance of this walkway
is likely to increase once the new Mt Eden
train station is completed. The number of
people using that station to access the Upper
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 14
Symonds Street area will grow (especially now
that the proposed station at Newton has been
deleted from the plans), and it is reasonable to
assume this walkway will become more heavily
trafficked. The building as viewed from further
up Mt Eden Road is a ‘corner building’ in design
terms, where the materials and detailing turn
the corner from Mt Eden Road to the walkway.
In this way, the building signals the presence of
the walkway, and makes more visible the urban
structure of the area.
As previously described, we have designed the
building in a way that makes using the walkway
a positive experience.
(v) are designed and located in a manner that respects original physical features of the special character area as identified in the built form section of the special character statement
For the reasons stated in (ii), (iii) and (iv)
above, we consider the proposal meets the
requirement.
(vi) where possible, are positioned to reflect and/or enhance the continuity of the historic front façade alignments of the adjoining character defining or character supporting buildings
There are no adjoining character buildings with
which to establish continuity.
However, the predominant character of
the character area is established by low-
rise buildings on the street boundary. The
requirement to set back the upper floors of the
building to avoid the E18 viewshaft can be seen
as a positive design influence in this regard.
The street façade (albeit set back 2.2 metres)
is thereby limited to a tall single storey, which
is consistent with some other buildings nearby,
and reduces the dominance that a six-storey
building on the street boundary could have.
(vii) are constructed with materials that are of a high standard of quality and durability that respond positively to the architectural character and detailing of any scheduled historic heritage place, character-defining or character-supporting buildings
The quality of materials has been previously
covered. While the detailing does not mimic
any of the detail on the character-supporting
buildings, there is nonetheless a textural
relationship that we consider is a positive
response (when compared to, say, a smooth
glass curtain-walled or concrete panelled
building).
(viii) are designed to respond positively to the established horizontal or vertical modulation evident on the front façade of any existing scheduled historic heritage place, character-defining or character-supporting buildingsWe do not consider this to be an important
factor in the design of the proposal. The
character- defining / supporting buildings are
some distance from the site, except for the
City-side Church across the road which is in
a timber gothic style unsuited for the type of
design reference suggested in the clause.
(ix) for retail premises, have main frontage(s) incorporating significant areas of unobscured display glazing and building entries reflecting traditional forms in order to maintain good visual connections with the street;
The proposed building has excellent
connections to Mt Eden Road,
with pedestrian entrances, and high visibility
into the premises.
(x) proposes to combine buildings and/or sites, so that the finished appearance/facade maintains visual evidence of the previous pattern of development by vertical modulation
Not applicable. This is a single site development,
and the previous pattern is simply a single, very
simple building.
(xi) provides for on-site parking or loading where this would enable better outcomes in terms of maintaining/enhancing special character and supporting commercial land use viability.
The parking and servicing is all on-site,
accessed from Shaddock Street. A consented
apartment development in 2006 used the
existing right-of-way from Mt Eden Road across
the neighbouring property at 47 Mt Eden Road
to access an upper basement.
Our proposal does not do that, as it is not
desirable to increase vehicle access across the
Mt Eden Rd footpath, but instead uses a car lift
to raise cars up from the Shaddock Street level.
This is a more expensive option.
Neither does the proposal create a new
crossing off Mt Eden Road, and we consider that
maintaining the continuous footpath across
our site frontage is a positive contribution to
the character of the area.
Page | 15
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Aerial view from SouthEast Aerial View from SE showing possible future development of the area
Aerial view from NW showing possible future development of the areaAerial view from North West
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 16
B U I L D I N G H E I G H TThe building exceeds the maximum height control of 19 metres plus 2
metres for roof form. We have assumed that the ‘extra height for roof
form’ is available to us as we have incorporated a strongly expressive
sloping roof form, which is above normal head-height when standing
on the uppermost floor.
The proposed building at the Mt Eden Road frontage complies with
the 21 metres total maximum height rule, but as we are obliged to use
the rolling-height method of assessing maximum height, the building
becomes increasingly over-height as the contours drop some 6.5 metres
moving from Mt Eden Road to Shaddock Street.
The part of the building that is over the 21 metre height requires
analysis in terms of its potential to increase shadowing of neighbouring
properties, and in terms of a possible resulting increase in visual
dominance of the proposal.
S H A D O W I N GShadow diagrams have been prepared for hourly intervals through
the day, on three days of the year, representing the mid-summer, the
equinox and mid-winter conditions. The shadows are shown as if cast
onto the ground and onto the roofs of adjoining buildings. The brighter
red indicates the extra shadow resulting from the over-height portion
of the proposal.
The diagrams illustrate the extra shadow areas are minor, and will have
little or no impact on neighbouring properties.
Page | 17
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
V I S U A L I M P A C T A S S E S S M E N TFor neighbours within the Special Character
Area to the north and south of the site, the
visual impact of the of the over-height portion
of the building will be similarly minor from low
viewpoints, increasing as the elevation of the
viewpoint from their sites increases.
From the neighbouring property at 2 Shaddock
Street, the over-height portion of the building
will not be visible from low viewpoints, again
as it is set well back from the edges of the
building. The over-height portion will be more
visible from viewpoints at a higher elevation,
from, say a redevelopment of this site.
Our view, however, is that these minor visual
impacts do not carry adverse effects, and that
negative effects of the over-height portion of
the building are less than minor.
The proposed building will be very visible from
certain specific places to the south and west of
the site, as well as the very important viewpoint
from Mt Eden Road when travelling south from
Symonds Street. It will not be visible from the
other major roads in the area – Symonds St,
Khyber Pass and New North Road.
The viewing audience is predominantly those
travelling through the neighbourhood to the
south of the site. There are some residents
in this area who will see the development
from their properties, particularly those in
the apartments at 10 Flower Street (along
Shaddock Street) , and in a few apartments in
Akiraho Street.
Several specific viewpoints have been chosen to
convey the visual impact of the proposal from
the surrounding area, plus one longer range
viewpoint on the northern slope of Mangawhau.
Photographs were taken from each viewpoint
and the proposed building has been inserted.
Additionally, a hypothetical building on the site
complying with the maximum height rule has
been inserted into the same images.
The viewpoints chosen are:
Mt Eden Road, outside Galbraiths.
Mt Eden Road, at the intersection with Boston
Road.
Shaddock Street, at the intersection with
Flower Street.
Akiraho Street, at the Brothers Brewery
courtyard.
A visual impact assessment deals with the
effect of change in the view available to people
caused by the development, and how it affects
their visual amenity. Visual amenity is defined
in Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact
Assessment v3 as “the overall pleasantness of
the views people enjoy of their surroundings,
which provide an attractive visual setting or
backdrop for the enjoyment of activities of
people living, working, recreating, visiting or
travelling through the area”.
In this case, only the incremental impact of
the proposed development where it exceeds
the permitted building envelope is assessed.
Although the site is within the Upper Symonds
Street Special Character Area, the visual
impact of the proposal when compared to
a hypothetical building that fully complies
with the maximum height rule is minor from
ground-level viewpoints inside the area. This
is because, from viewpoints on Mt Eden Road,
the frontage of the building will comply with
the overall 21 metre height restriction, and
most of the building bulk that is above the
maximum height plane is set back from the side
boundaries, and won’t be seen from the street.
Mt Eden Road, at the intersection with Kelly
Street.
Mangawhau, northern side of the field on top
of the water reservoir.
The images created from those viewpoints
demonstrate that there is no visual impact
from the over-height portion of the proposal
from viewpoint 1, and only a minor impact
with less than minor adverse effects from other
viewpoints to the south. In the long-range
view from Mangawhau, the difference is barely
perceptible.
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 18
Com
plyi
ng -
E18
L O C A L I T Y P L A N S & V I E W P O I N T SViews from significant points showing a complying development and the proposed development. Viewpoints are numbered on the map.
Prop
osed
- E1
8
Page | 19
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Com
plyi
ng -
Acro
ss th
e ro
adPr
opos
ed -
Acro
ss th
e ro
ad
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 20
Com
plyi
ng -
Bost
on R
d in
ters
ectio
nPr
opos
ed -
Bost
on R
d in
ters
ectio
n
Page | 21
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Com
plyi
ng m
ass
view
s - S
hadd
ock
St lo
ng d
istan
cePr
opos
ed m
ass
view
s - S
hadd
ock
St lo
ng d
istan
ce
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 22
Com
plyi
ng -
Kelly
St I
nter
secti
on w
ith M
t Ede
n Rd
Prop
osed
-Kel
ly S
t Int
erse
ction
with
Mt E
den
Rd
Page | 23
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Complying - From northern slope of Mangawhau
Proposed - From northern slope of Mangawhau
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
Page | 24
Urban Des ign & V isua l Assessment
C O N C L U S I O N
Page | 24
The proposed building sets a new standard for apartment buildings in Eden Terrace,
and shows a good outcome resulting from the new Unitary Plan rules for the area.
The scale of the building is bigger than the existing scale for the vicinity, which
has remained unchanged for over a century. As such, it responds not only to the
existing scale and character of the Upper Symonds Street area, but also to the future
planned context of a quite dense neighbourhood around the new train station.
The impact of the extra height designed in the proposed development is virtually
nil on the special character area, and is minor from viewpoints to the south and
west, with less than minor adverse effects.
The care with which the public realm around the building has been considered,
and the design, detailing and materials of the building itself we consider fully
compensate for the minor infringement of the maximum height control.