Design Urbano

Download Design Urbano

Post on 11-Aug-2014

153 views

Category:

Design

17 download

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Ser um desenvolvedor de imagens geomtricas um dom da dedicao.!.

TRANSCRIPT

<ul><li><p>1 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Image: Hudson Yards Redevelopment, New York, NY a project managed using Textura Construction Collaboration Solutions </p><p>Patrick Allin Chairman, CEO, Co-founder </p></li><li><p>2 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Safe Harbor </p><p> This presentation includes forward-looking statements, including statements regarding Textura's future financial performance, market growth, demand for Textura's solutions, and general business conditions. Any forward looking statements contained in this presentation are based upon Textura's historical performance and its current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends affecting the financial condition of its business. These forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to Textura, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to, trends in the global and domestic economy and the commercial construction industry; our ability to effectively manage our growth; our ability to develop the market for our solutions; competition with our business; our dependence on a limited number of client relationships for a significant portion of our revenues; our dependence on a single software solution for a substantial portion of our revenues; the length of the selling cycle to secure new enterprise relationships for our CPM solution, which requires significant investment of resources; our ability to cross-sell our solutions; the continued growth of the market for on-demand software solutions; our ability to develop and bring to market new solutions in a timely manner; our success in expanding our international business and entering new industries; and the availability of suitable acquisitions or partners and our ability to achieve expected benefits from such acquisitions or partnerships, including our acquisition of PlanSwift in January 2013 and our acquisition of Latista in December 2013. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information, except to the extent required by applicable laws. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements. Further information on potential factors that could affect actual results is included under the heading Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 26, 2013, and our other reports filed with the SEC. </p><p> In addition to U.S. GAAP financial information, this presentation includes certain non-GAAP financial measures. These historical and forward-looking non-GAAP measures are in addition to, not a substitute for or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP measures is included at the end of this presentation and is also included in Texturas Q4 2013 Earnings Release on the Companys Investor Relations website at investors.texturacorp.com. </p>http://investors.texturacorp.com/</li><li><p>3 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Investment Highlights </p><p>Global market opportunity </p><p>Compelling client value proposition </p><p>CPM no competition </p><p>High EBITDA margin potential </p><p> Exceptional revenue growth </p><p> Experienced </p><p> team </p></li><li><p>4 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Current Business Processes Complex, Error Prone, Inefficient </p><p>Banks / Insurers </p><p>Title Company </p><p>Owner / Developer </p><p>Sub-contractors Engineers </p><p>Architects </p><p>General Contractors </p><p>Suppliers </p><p>Architects Financing </p><p>Companies Insurance </p><p>Companies </p><p>Owner/ Developer </p><p> GC </p><p>Prime Sub Prime Sub </p><p>Sub </p><p>Material Supplier </p><p>Sub Sub Sub </p><p>Sub-tier Sub-tier </p><p>Sub-tier </p><p>Etc. </p><p>. . . Material Supplier </p><p>Material Supplier </p><p>. . . </p><p>Sub . . . </p><p>Prime Sub . . . </p><p>Title Companies </p><p>Engineers . . . </p><p>Design Pre-</p><p>qualification Bid Contracting Construction Close-out </p></li><li><p>5 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Textura Solutions Addressing the Project Lifecycle </p><p>Design Pre-</p><p>qualification Bid Contracting Construction Close-out </p><p>CPM </p><p>PlanSwift Submittal Exchange </p><p>GradeBeam </p><p>PQM Submittal Exchange </p><p>Construction Collaboration Solutions </p><p>Latista BidOrganizer </p></li><li><p>6 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Risk management </p><p>Cost efficiencies </p><p>Process management </p><p>Significant Benefits to our Clients </p><p>Faster payment </p></li><li><p>7 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Client Case Study #1 Strong ROI </p><p> Denver-based General Contractor Internal Study Findings: </p><p> Textura CPM saves 260-330 hours a month </p><p> Time savings for our risk administrator and the project managers </p><p> Improves accuracy of paperwork </p><p> Greatly improves subcontractor relations </p><p> Creating capacity is essential to avoid having to hire additional staff </p><p>General Contractor ROI: </p><p> Estimated savings: $360,000 annually </p><p> Estimated by the general contractor to cost them 4 basis points of construction value: $74,000 annually </p><p>Estimated Total Network Revenue to Textura: </p><p> ~$300,000 annually </p><p> 75% of subs already CPM users Textura CPM eliminates </p><p>15 out of 20 process steps </p></li><li><p>8 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Client Case Study #2 Broad Relationships, Very Sticky </p><p> General Contractor o $2 million annual </p><p>network revenue </p><p> Textura is integrated with their mission-critical business processes </p><p> Enterprise-wide implementation - all projects </p><p> Adding 10 to 15 new projects a month no Textura sales activity </p><p> Switching back to manual processes would be . . . difficult stickier than a subscription </p><p>4,055 monthly invoice cycles </p><p>32,044 electronic payments </p><p>$3.43 billion </p><p>disbursed </p><p>655 active users </p><p>4 years on </p><p>CPM </p><p>475 projects </p><p>on-system </p><p>8,862 sub- </p><p>contracts </p><p>ERP system </p><p>integration </p></li><li><p>9 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Sustainable Competitive Advantages Protect CPM </p><p>Patent portfolio </p><p>Installed user base </p><p>Complex functionality </p><p>Integration to client systems </p><p>Neutral 3rd party SaaS offering </p><p> 41 patents for CPM and 50 pending </p><p> 300 GCs and Owners 80,000 subcontractor organizations </p><p> Configurable by project 250,000 major ways </p><p> 300+ interfaces to client ERP systems </p><p> No significant competitor exists as a SaaS neutral collaboration platform </p></li><li><p>10 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Over $28 billion of Total Addressable Market </p><p>Market Expansion </p><p>Monetization Huge Total </p><p>Addressable Market </p><p>Target Global </p><p>Markets &gt;$4.8t </p><p>Current Markets &gt;$1.3t </p><p>Current Solutions ~30 bps </p><p>Total Addressable </p><p>Market &gt;$28.0b </p><p>Current Markets </p><p>and Solutions </p><p>&gt;$4.4b </p><p>Global Platform ~50 bps </p><p>Key Strategies: North America market </p><p>penetration Global expansion to Asia </p><p>and Western Europe </p><p>Key Strategies: Cross-sell solutions Strategic acquisitions Solution expansion Solutions to platform Pricing </p><p>Result: </p><p> Potential for long term very high revenue growth rates </p><p>Target Global </p><p>Opportunity ~55-60 bps Current </p><p>Opportunity ~34 bps </p><p>Mobile +510 bps </p><p>Mobile +4 bps </p><p>~$3.9b </p><p>Mobile +$0.5b </p><p>~$24.0b </p><p>+$4.0b </p></li><li><p>11 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Multiple Long-term Growth Opportunities </p><p>Market penetration </p><p>Cross-sell solutions </p><p>Global expansion </p><p>Related markets </p><p>Strategic acquisitions </p><p>New products </p><p>Future </p><p>US, Canada, Australia </p><p>Western Europe, </p><p>Developed Asia </p><p>Mining </p><p>Oil and Gas </p><p>Data </p><p>Financing </p><p>Price </p><p> Approx. 8% penetration </p><p> 7 primary solutions </p><p> Few multi-product clients </p><p> Bundled sales/ pricing </p><p> Platform strategy </p><p> Project lifecycle from design to operation </p><p> Integrated solution suite </p><p>Submittal Exchange </p><p>GradeBeam </p><p>PlanSwift </p><p>CPM </p><p>PlanSwift Submittal Exchange </p><p>GradeBeam </p><p>PQM </p><p>BidOrganizer </p><p>Latista </p></li><li><p>12 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Financial Overview </p><p>Image: Denver International Airport South Terminal Redevelopment, Denver, CO </p><p> a project managed using Textura Construction Collaboration Solutions </p><p>Jillian Sheehan EVP and CFO </p></li><li><p>13 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Financial Highlights </p><p>Strong growth </p><p>Predictable highly visible </p><p>growth </p><p>High operating leverage </p><p>Investing for growth </p></li><li><p>14 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Consistently High Growth Rates </p><p>$6.0 </p><p>$10.5 </p><p>$21.7 </p><p>$35.5 </p><p>FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13</p><p>90% 75% 106% 64% </p><p>Year-over-year change </p><p> $3.3 </p><p> $4.5 $5.2 </p><p> $5.7 $6.3 $6.8 </p><p> $8.5 $9.4 </p><p> $10.9 </p><p>Sep 11 Dec 11 Mar 12 Jun 12 Sep 12 Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13</p><p>77% 110% 119% 109% 92% 51% 65% 65% 72% </p><p>Year-over-year change </p><p>Organic growth Organic growth </p><p>77% 76% 74% 70% 60% 45% 46% 38% 45% 90% 75% 69% 44% </p></li><li><p>15 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Revenue Model Broad Base of Paying Customers </p><p> Revenue from all users </p><p> Fees are invoiced and collected in advance </p><p> Highly sticky, recurring, and visible </p><p>CPM </p><p>PlanSwift </p><p>Submittal Exchange </p><p>GradeBeam </p><p>PQM </p><p>Activity-driven </p><p> Owners/GCs Subscription fees based on </p><p>project portfolio total number of projects/construction value </p><p> Subcontractors Project usage fee varies by </p><p>value of contract </p><p>Organization-driven </p><p> Primarily organization annual subscription fees </p><p> Fees based on: Construction volume, </p><p>number of offices/subcontractors </p><p>BidOrganizer </p><p>Latista </p></li><li><p>16 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>CPM Revenue Model Providing Value to All Participants </p><p>Sub Tier </p><p>($2 million) </p><p>Owner/ General Contractor ($25 million project) </p><p>Prime Subcontractor </p><p>($7 million) </p><p>Prime Subcontractor </p><p>($6 million) </p><p>Prime Subcontractor </p><p>($2 million) </p><p>Prime Subcontractor </p><p>($5 million) </p><p>Sub Tier </p><p>($1.5 million) </p><p>Sub Tier </p><p>($1 million) </p><p>Sub Tier </p><p>($1 million) </p><p>Sub Tier </p><p>($2 million) </p><p>Sub Tier </p><p>($1 million) </p><p>Sub Tier </p><p>($.5 million) </p><p>Sub Tier </p><p>($.5 million) </p><p>Project Fee Plus Monthly Subscription Fee </p><p>(Based on Project Size) </p><p>Usage Fees </p><p>(15 basis points of </p><p>Full Contract </p><p>Value) </p><p>Flat $50 Fee </p></li><li><p>17 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Implementing Clients Drive Predictable Multi-period Growth </p><p>0</p><p>100</p><p>200</p><p>300</p><p>400</p><p>500</p><p>Active projects</p><p>0</p><p>50</p><p>100</p><p>150</p><p>200</p><p>250</p><p>300</p><p>Steady revenue ramp </p><p> Business growth </p><p>Case Study Client #1 Case Study Client #2 </p><p>Steady revenue ramp </p><p>Business growth </p><p>In Implementation Fully </p><p>Implemented In Implementation </p><p>Fully Implemented </p></li><li><p>18 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Continued Success Implementing Clients </p><p>Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13</p><p>Mill</p><p>ion</p><p>s </p><p>New Projects Added </p><p>1,048 1,245 </p><p>1,467 1,511 </p><p>Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13</p><p>Mill</p><p>ion</p><p>s </p><p>Construction Value Added </p><p>$13.6 </p><p>$10.6 $7.3 </p><p>$23.7 </p><p>Dec 12 Mar 13 Jun 13 Sep 13</p><p>Number of Organizations </p><p>10,114 8,210 </p><p>6,997 5,412 </p></li><li><p>19 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Long-term Operating Model Yields Highly Attractive Margins </p><p>FY2012 FY2013 3 -4 Year </p><p>Target </p><p>Revenue Mix Activity-driven Organization-driven </p><p> 88% 12% </p><p> 79% 21% </p><p> 70% 30% </p><p>Non- GAAP Gross Margin 73% 78% 87% - 90% </p><p>Non-GAAP operating expenses as % of revenue General and Administrative Sales and marketing Technology and development Total Non-GAAP operating expenses </p><p>40% 26% 49% </p><p>115% </p><p>48% 28% 40% </p><p>116% </p><p>12% - 15% 17% - 20% 15% - 17% 45% - 52% </p><p>Adjusted EBITDA (43)% (38)% 35% - 45% </p></li><li><p>20 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>Image: World Trade Center Transportation Hub, New York, NY a project managed using Textura Construction Collaboration Solutions </p><p>Questions . . . and Thank You </p></li><li><p>21 2013 Textura Corporation </p><p>GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation </p><p>Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012 Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2013 </p><p>GAAP Pro-Forma </p><p>Adjustments </p><p>Pro-Forma Operating Expenses % GAAP </p><p>Pro-Forma Adjustments </p><p>Pro-Forma Operating Expenses % </p><p>(in thousands) </p><p>Revenues 21,681 0 21,681 100.00% 35,534 0 35,534 100.00% </p><p>Operating expenses </p><p>Cost of services 6,152 (203) 5,949 27.44% 11,754 (3,793) 7,961 22.40% </p><p>General and administrative 11,105 (2,329) 8,776 40.48% 23,479 (6,328) 17,151 48.27% </p><p>Sales and marketing 5,995 (298) 5,697 26.28% 12,707 (2,779) 9,928 27.94% </p><p>Technology and development 11,123 (587) 10,536 48.60% 18,148 (4,004) 14,144 39.80% </p><p>Depreciation and amortization 4,080 (4,080) 0 4,525 (4,525) 0 </p><p>Total operating expenses 38,455 (7,497) 30,958 142.79% 70,613 (21,429) 49,184 138.41% </p><p>Loss from Operations (16,774) 7,497 (9,277) -42.79% (35,079) 21,429 (13,650) -38.41% </p></li></ul>