destination 1 local evaluators. who are you? roles responsibilities perspective
TRANSCRIPT
DestinationDestination 1 1
Local EvaluatorsLocal Evaluators
Who Are You?Who Are You?
RolesRolesResponsibilitiesResponsibilitiesPerspectivePerspective
Kick-Off GoalsKick-Off GoalsGoal 1: Increase connections to each other, state and Goal 1: Increase connections to each other, state and
national resources, their local communities and the national resources, their local communities and the youth we serve.youth we serve.
True CommunityTrue CommunityNetworkingNetworkingListservsListservsMeetingsMeetingsYouth Advisory GroupsYouth Advisory GroupsParent Advisory GroupsParent Advisory Groups
Kick-Off GoalsKick-Off GoalsGoal 2: Increase connections to learning and professional Goal 2: Increase connections to learning and professional
development at all levels (administration, site staff, development at all levels (administration, site staff, vendors, and partners.)vendors, and partners.)
Professional DevelopmentProfessional DevelopmentBudgetBudgetAligning P.D. with Grant Goals Aligning P.D. with Grant Goals
and Evaluationand EvaluationStandardsStandardsCore CompetenciesCore CompetenciesCertificate/CredentialCertificate/Credential
Kick-Off GoalsKick-Off GoalsGoal 3: Increase connections to the school day, teachers, Goal 3: Increase connections to the school day, teachers,
curriculum, and administration.curriculum, and administration.
Embedded AcademicsEmbedded AcademicsMeetingsMeetingsCommon LanguageCommon Language Intentional AlignmentIntentional Alignment
Grant = ContractGrant = ContractAssurancesAssurances Fiscal Fiscal
Agent/Authorized Agent/Authorized OfficialsOfficials
Co-ApplicantsCo-Applicants SuperintendentsSuperintendents PrincipalsPrincipals PartnersPartners
Road MapRoad Map WhatWhat WhenWhen HowHow WhoWho
FEDERAL FEDERAL TARGETSTARGETS
Michigan’s improvement on Michigan’s improvement on reading gradesreading grades stayed the stayed the
same.same. Federal target this Federal target this
year was 60%, year was 60%, increased from last increased from last year by 5%. year by 5%.
Michigan did not Michigan did not meet the federal meet the federal target.target.
Michigan has Michigan has consistently had consistently had about a third of about a third of students improve by students improve by ½ grade.½ grade.
National data not available for past two years.2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand Rapids.
Michigan’s improvement on Michigan’s improvement on math gradesmath grades dropped slightly dropped slightly
since last year.since last year. Federal Federal
target was target was 48.5%. 48.5%.
Michigan did Michigan did not meet the not meet the federal federal target.target.
Michigan Michigan showed a showed a slight decline slight decline this year.this year.
National data not available for past two years.2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand Rapids.
Michigan did not meet the Michigan did not meet the target in target in MEAP ReadingMEAP Reading..
The federal target was raised from 28% to 35%.
There were slight increases in the percent of students who improved.
More middle/high school students improved their MEAP reading scores than elementary students.
However, elementary students made somewhat steeper gains than middle/high school students this year.
National data not available for past two years.2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand Rapids.% students who moved to Proficient in the current year from Not Proficient in the previous year.
Michigan’s met the target for Michigan’s met the target for middle/high school students, middle/high school students,
but not elementary students, in but not elementary students, in MEAP MathMEAP Math.. The federal target
was raised from 16% to 20%.
Middle/high school students met the target, but declined from the previous year.
Elementary students did not meet the new target, but stayed stable.
National data not available for past two years.2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand Rapids.% students who moved to Proficient in the current year from Not Proficient in the previous year.
Michigan did not meet the target Michigan did not meet the target this year for this year for improved homework improved homework
completion/classroom completion/classroom participation.participation. The federal The federal
target is 77%.target is 77%. Michigan did Michigan did
not meet the not meet the target, but is target, but is fairly close.fairly close.
Michigan has Michigan has remained remained stable for the stable for the past two years.past two years.
National data not available for past two years.Teacher survey data.
Michigan did not meet the Michigan did not meet the target this year for target this year for improved improved
student behavior.student behavior.The federal
target is 75%.Michigan did
not meet the target, but is close.
Michigan has been stable for the past three years.National data not available for past two years.
Teacher survey data.
ROOM FOR ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENTIMPROVEMENT
(Grades Only)(Grades Only)
Michigan youth whose grades had Michigan youth whose grades had room for improvement were much room for improvement were much
closer to meeting the target.closer to meeting the target. Nearly half of Nearly half of
Michigan Michigan students who students who had room to had room to improve did improve did so.so.
National data not available for past two years.2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand Rapids.Room for improvement = reading grades of 3.0 or less.
Michigan youth whose grades Michigan youth whose grades have room for improvement were have room for improvement were
close to the target on close to the target on math math grades.grades. Students with Students with
room for room for improvement improvement were closer to were closer to meeting the meeting the target.target.
Slight declines Slight declines were evident were evident this year.this year.
National data not available for past two years.2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand Rapids.Room for improvement = math grades of 3.0 or less.
What does this mean for What does this mean for you?you?
Some sites met targets, some did not.Some sites met targets, some did not. Each site’s status on federal targets is outlined in the ARF tables.Each site’s status on federal targets is outlined in the ARF tables. When you receive the ARF tables, look at data to see how each site When you receive the ARF tables, look at data to see how each site
did on targets.did on targets. If a site did not meet targets, look at data to see how site did on If a site did not meet targets, look at data to see how site did on
academic instruction and instructional context.academic instruction and instructional context. Identify improvement goals and strategies to meet those goals Identify improvement goals and strategies to meet those goals
based on the data and your knowledge of your program.based on the data and your knowledge of your program.
TACSSTACSS
Technical Assistance and Technical Assistance and Coaching Support ServicesCoaching Support Services
The Purpose of TACSS is The Purpose of TACSS is to…to…
Improve the overall Improve the overall qualityquality of 21 of 21stst Century Community Learning Century Community Learning Centers.Centers.
Offer Offer start-up support start-up support for new 21for new 21stst Century sites.Century sites.
Grow a culture ofGrow a culture of performance performance . . accountabilityaccountability and an and an infrastructure for infrastructure for continuous continuous quality improvement quality improvement ..
The Quality The Quality Improvement ProcessImprovement Process
TACSS services are TACSS services are provided by…provided by…
“CYPQ” … “the YPQA People”
Meet the TACSS Meet the TACSS Team…Team…
Angelina Garner, Manager
Amber Duddy, Program Assistant
Meet the TACSS Meet the TACSS Coaches…Coaches…
Trevor Davies, North and West
Gina McGovern, South East
Jerome Threlkeld, Central and East
TACSS Services available TACSS Services available to to
ALLALL 21 21stst CCLC programs CCLC programsSelf Assessment SupportSelf Assessment Support Youth PQA Basics Workshop (live and online Youth PQA Basics Workshop (live and online NEW NEW
Platform!Platform!)) Youth PQA Plus! Workshop Youth PQA Plus! Workshop NEW!NEW! Planning With Data WorkshopPlanning With Data Workshop Scores Reporter Webinars Scores Reporter Webinars NEW Platform!NEW Platform!
Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development Youth Work Methods Workshops Youth Work Methods Workshops (targeted audience: site staff)(targeted audience: site staff) Quality Coaching Workshop Quality Coaching Workshop (targeted audience: site managers)(targeted audience: site managers) Lunch and Learn Networking Series Lunch and Learn Networking Series (targeted audience: all (targeted audience: all
staff)staff)
Technical AssistanceTechnical Assistance Scores Reporter access and issuesScores Reporter access and issues
2009 – 2010 in 2009 – 2010 in NumbersNumbers
3737 trainings trainings20812081
attendeesattendees
Trainings per RegionMid19%
North12%
South East16%
South West12%
West9%
Online 32%
Satisfaction with TACSSSatisfaction with TACSS
100%100% of end-of-year survey respondents of end-of-year survey respondents reported:reported:
““given the demands of my job, the Youth PQA given the demands of my job, the Youth PQA self assessment process is a self assessment process is a good use of my good use of my
timetime..””
TACSS trainers receive an average score TACSS trainers receive an average score of of 4.554.55 on “ on “Overall quality of trainingOverall quality of training” ” on workshop evaluation forms.on workshop evaluation forms.
Register for ALL trainings at Michigan.cypq.org
Youth PQA TrainingsYouth PQA Trainings
Youth PQA BasicsYouth PQA Basics
Learn to use the Learn to use the Youth PQA tool Youth PQA tool and how to lead and how to lead or participate in or participate in the self the self assessmentassessment process.process.
Youth PQA Plus! Youth PQA Plus! NEW! NEW!
Must be familiar Must be familiar with the Youth PQA with the Youth PQA tool.tool.
Learn guidelines Learn guidelines and strategies for and strategies for including the Youth including the Youth PQA throughout the PQA throughout the year.year.10/ 22 @ Oakland ISD
10/ 29 @ Kalamazoo9:00 – 1:00
11/ 5 @ Grand Rapids11/ 11 @ Detroit
9:00 – 1:00
Also offered
ONLINE
Scores Reporter Scores Reporter WebinarWebinar
CYPQ is launching a CYPQ is launching a NEW! NEW! online learning online learning system with user-system with user-friendly featuresfriendly features
Step-by-step guide to Step-by-step guide to entering:entering: self assessment data self assessment data
due 12/ 15due 12/ 15
Program Improvement Program Improvement Plan Plan due 2/ 7due 2/ 7 12/ 1 @ 10:00 AM
12/ 7 @ 1:00 PM12/ 14 @ 10:00 AM
Planning With DataPlanning With Data
Dig into your self Dig into your self assessment data assessment data as a team as a team
Start (if not Start (if not complete) your complete) your Program Program Improvement Improvement Plan (Plan (due due February 7February 7))
12/ 10 @ Traverse City1/ 14 @ Genesee
1/ 21 @ Grand Rapids9:00 – 1:00
Quality CoachingQuality Coaching Help staff Help staff
improve by improve by having one-on-having one-on-one conversations one conversations with them about with them about their instructions. their instructions.
Learn the process Learn the process of of Observation-Observation-ReflectionReflection to to support staff to support staff to develop develop professionally.professionally.
9/ 17 @ Flint9/ 28 @ Battle Creek
9:00 – 1:00
Networking Lunch Networking Lunch and Learnand Learn
Semi-structured Semi-structured discussion discussion forumsforums
Think about and Think about and discuss discuss best best practices practices with with your peers.your peers.
Lunch is Lunch is provided!provided!
11/ 19 @ Macomb ISD3/ 18 @ Muskegon
9:00 – 1:00
Thank you!Thank you!
For questions For questions about training or about training or for online for online assistance, assistance, contact: contact: Amber Duddy, Amber Duddy,
Program AssistantProgram Assistant
734.961.6900 x 208734.961.6900 x 208
[email protected]@cypq.org
Register for ALL trainings at
Michigan.cypq.org