detail project report (dpr) -...

Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency

Detail Project Report

Project Name – IWMP-14

Project Identity – Jasvantgadh Project 2011-12

Project Implementing Agency

District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU) Sabarkantha

Table of Content

Chapter 1 Project Background………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3

1.1. Project Background………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4

Table no.1: Basic project information……………………………………………………………………………………...5

1.2 Geographical Area of the Project………………………………………………………………………………………………6

1.3 Project Area of the IWMP-14 Idar Cluster……………………………………………………………………………………7

Table no.2: Weight age of the project……………………………………………………………………………………….9

1.4 Need of Watershed Development Program……………………………………………………………………………………11

Table No. 2 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed…………………………………………………………………...11

Table no.3: Watershed information…………………………………………………………………………………………12

1.5 Area proposed to be treated…………………………………………………………………………………………………….13

Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area……………………………………………………………14

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area………………………………………………………..14

Chapter- 2 Project Implementation Agency………………………………………………………………………………………………..15

2.1 Project Implementing Agency…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...16

2.2 District Watershed Development Unit, Sabarkantha………………………………………………………………………………….17

2.3 Programmes / Projects running in the district…………………………………………………………………………………………17

Table no. 6: PIA………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………18

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level………………………………………………………………………………………………………..19

Table No. 7.1 Staff at Cluster Level………………………………………………………………………………………………...20

2.4 SWOT analysis of the DWDU…………………………………………………………………………………………………………....21

Chapter: 3 Basic Information of Project Area……………………………………………………………………………………………..22

3.1 Basic Information of Project Area…………………………………………………………………………………………….23

3.2 Land use pattern………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..24

Table no. 8: Land use pattern………………………………………………………………………………………………………..25

3.3 Soil and topography………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...........26

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography……………………………………………………………………………………………….27

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition………………………………………………………………………………………….28

3.4 Edaphic Factors………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….28

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….29

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)…………………………………………………………………………...30

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions…………………………………………………………………………………………...30

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions…………………………………………………………………………………………………….31

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief……………………………………………………………………………………………….31

3.5 Land and Agriculture………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....32

Table no. 14: Land ownership details……………………………………………………………………….………………………..33

Table no. 15: Agriculture…………………………………………………………………………………….………………………..33

Table no. 16: Irrigation…………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….…..34

Table no. 17: Crop details………………………………………………………………………………….…………………..……….35

Table no. 18: Livestock…………………………………………………………………………………….…………………...………36

Table no. 19: Drinking water…………………………………………………………………………….………………...………….37

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources………………………………………………….……………………………38

Table no. 21: Demographic information……………………………………………………………….…………..………………….39

Table no. 22: Literacy rate…………………………………………………………………………….……….………………………40

Table no. 23: Migration details……………………………………………………………………….…….………………………….41

Table no. 24: Poverty ………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………42

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure……………………………………………………………………………………………………43

3.6 Infrastructure Facilities……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…...44

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets…………………………………………………………………………………………….………45

Table no. 27: Income……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………46

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR……………………………………………………………………………………………...47

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)………………………………………………………………………..48

3.7 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World………………….49

3.8 The IWMP-14 project has low productivity because of the following reasons…………………………………………………………50

Chapter 4 Watershed Activity………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....51

4.1 Watershed Activities………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..52

4.2 Scientific Planning………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....53

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects………………………………………………………...54

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area……………………………………………………...………..55

4.3 Institution building……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………..56

4.4 Self Help Group……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…...56

Table no. 33: SHG detail………………………………………………………………………………………………………………57

4.5 User Group (UG) …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……58

Table no. 34: UG detail………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..60

4.6 Entry Point activity (EPA)………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...62

Tableno.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)………………………………………………………….63

4.7 Watershed Development Works………………………………………………………………………………………………………….66

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed work……………………………………………..67

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)………………..68

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)……69

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises………………………………….70

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas …………………………………..72

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level………………………………………………………………………………………74

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works…………………………………………….75

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas……………………………………………………………………..79

4.8 Capacity Building …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..80

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution……………………………………………………………………………………………...81

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan……………………………………………………………………………………………………82

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities………………………………………………………………...83

Chapter 5 Budgeting…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….83

5.1 Budget………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...84

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project………………………………………………………………………………….............85

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP………………………………………………………...…85

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement……………………………………………………………………………….......86

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes……………………………………………………………............87

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects………………………………………………………………………87

Chapter-6 Expected Outcome…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..88

6.1 Employment……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....89

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area……………………………………………………………………………………………..90

Table no. 53: Seasonal migration from Project area…………………………………………………………………………………...91

Table no. 54: Average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)…………………………………………………...91

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water………………………………………………………………………………………………….92

Table no. 56: Crop area and yield in the project area………………………………………………………………………………….93

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture…………………………………………………………………………………………………94

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover………………………………………………………………………………………….………95

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas………………………………………………………………………………...96

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages……………………………………………………………………………………………97

Chapter -7 Quality And Sustainability Issues………………………………………………………………………………………………….98

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………………………….……....99

7.2 Plans for Project management……………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..100

7.3 Watershed Development Fund……………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..101

7.4 User Charges………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...102

7.5 Logical Frame Works……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….103

MAPS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..104

Chapter 1

Project Background

1.1 Project Background

Jasvantgadh Project (IWMP-14) project is located in Idar Taluka, Sabarkantha District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of

seven micro watershed 5F2D6c3f, 5F2D6dlf 5F2D6dlg 5F2D6dle, 5F2D6c2g, 5F2D6c2h, 5F2D6c2e with as their respective

codes. The total project area of the watershed is about 5096.9 Ha, which proposed to be treated 4689.70ha under Integrated

Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).The watershed falls under the government designated flat area. It is located very

near to the Taluka place Idar Town in Sabarkantha.

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr

No.

Name of

the

Project

Villages Gram

Panchayats

Tal

uka

Distr

ict

Area of the

project

Area

proposed

to be

treated

Cost in

Lakhs PIA

Name Census code

1

IWMP-

14

(Jasvantg

adh

Project)

Barvav 050040036540000 Barvav

Idar

Sab

ark

anth

a

460.70 434.00 52.08

DW

DU

Sab

ark

anth

a 2 Budheli 050040036740000 Budheli 577.70 432.40 51.89

3 Khaski 050040036830000 Khaski 329.30 254.70 30.56

4 Jasvantgad

h 050040036510000 Jasvantgadh 1620.40 1579.80 189.58

5 Masal 050040036730000 Masal 655.00 640.10 76.81

6 Ratanpur 050040036530000 Ratanpur 693.30 637.60 76.51

7 Umedgadh 050040036840000 Umedgadh 760.50 651.10 78.13

Total 5096.90 4629.70 555.56

1.2 Geographical Area of the Project

1.3 Project Area of the IWMP-14 Idar Cluster

1.4 Need of Watershed Development Program

Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST.

Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmer, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking

water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has

already development/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain, Based on these thirteen parameter a composite ranking was been

given to Jashwantgarh Watershed project as given in table no. 3

The total number of families under BPL is 478 (as per form filled by talati mantri), which is 20.44 per cent of the total households of

the village. Hence a score of 5 is allotted. The percentage of schedule castes in the village is about 45.15 percent to the total population;

hence a score of 10 is allotted. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and

hence unfit for usage. More than 60 cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less

than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5 and 5 are allotted respectively.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DPAP block. Drinking

water is problematic in the village. The soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability

of timely irrigation. Jasvatgardh watershed falls in continuity with other watersheds namely Barvav, Budheli, Khaski, Jasvantgadh, Masal,

Ratanpur, Umedgadh . Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration nine micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5096.90 Ha.

All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 82 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below

Table no.2: Weight age of the project

Project

name Project type Weight age

IWMP Flat Area I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII

IWMP-

14 Jasvantgadh

Project 5 10 5 5 2 10 5 5 5 5 10 15 0

Table No. 2.1 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed

Sr.

No. Criteria

Maximum

score Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of poor to

population) 7.5

Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below

20 %

(2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 5

More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)

iii Actual wages

0

Actual wages are

significantly lower than

minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or

higher than minimum

wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal

farmers 5

More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 3 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block 10

-66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10)

DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0)

Non DPAP/ DDP

Block

vii Area under rain-fed agriculture

15

More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above

70 %

(Reject)

viii Drinking water

7.5

No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered

(5)

Fully

covered

(0)

ix Degraded land 10

High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low- less than 10

% of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of the

land

15

Lands with low production

& where productivity can

be significantly enhanced

with reasonable efforts

(15)

Lands with moderate

production & where

productivity can be

enhanced with reasonable

efforts (10)

Lands with high

production & where

productivity can be

marginally

enhanced with

reasonable efforts

(5)

xi Contiguity to another

watershed that has already 5

Contiguous to previously

treated watershed &

Contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project but

Neither contiguous

to previously

been developed/ treated contiguity within the

micro watersheds in the

project (10)

non contiguous to

previously treated watershed

(5)

treated watershed

nor contiguity

within the micro

watersheds in the

project

xii Cluster approach in the plains

(more than one contiguous

micro-watersheds in the

project)

15

Above 6 micro-watersheds

in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in

cluster (10)

2 to 4 micro

watersheds in

cluster (5)

xiii Cluster approach in the hills

(more than one contiguous

micro-watersheds in the

project)

15

Above 5 micro-watersheds

in cluster (15)

3 to 5 micro watersheds in

cluster (10)

2 to 3 micro

watersheds in

cluster (5)

Total 113 150 90 41 2.5

Table no.3: Watershed information

Sr.No Name of the

project

No. of watersheds to be

treated Watershed code

Watershed

regime/type/order

1

IWMP-14

Jashwantgard

Project

Barvav 1 5F2D6c3f Micro Watershed

2 Budheli 1 5F2D6dlf Micro Watershed

3 Khaski 1 5F2D6dlg Micro Watershed

4 Jasvantgadh 1 5F2D6dle Micro Watershed

5 Masal 1 5F2D6c2g Micro Watershed

6 Ratanpur 1 5F2D6c2h Micro Watershed

7 Umedgadh 1 5F2D6c2e Micro Watershed

Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area

Si. No

Name of the

programmes/scheme Sponsoring agency

Objectives of the

programmes/scheme

Year of

commencement

Villages

covered

Estimated

number of

beneficiaries

Barvav

1 Irrigation Govt. of Gujarat. Irrigation water 1995

Barvav

7

2 MGNREGA Rural Development Dept. Employment 2006-2012 25

3 WASMO Govt. of Gujarat Drinking water facility 2008 1

4 SGSY Rural Development Dept. Financial Inclusion 2008-2010 1

5 TSC Rural Development Dept. Toilet Facility 2009-2010 29

Budheli

1 IAY Rural Development Dept. House Facility 1995

Budheli

2

2 SGSY Rural Development Dept Employment 1995 8

3 TSC Rural Development Dept Toilet Facility 2005 50

4 Irrigation Govt. of Gujarat Irrigation water

(Check dam) 2005

10


6 WASMO Govt. of Gujarat Drinking water facility 2009-10 1

Khaski


Khaski

2

2 SGSY Rural Development Dept. Employment 1995 5


4 Irrigation Govt. of Gujarat

Irrigation water (Check

dam) 2003-04 13

5 MGNREGA Rural Development Dep. Employment 2005 38

TSC Rural Development Dep. Toilet Facility 2005 40

Jasvantgadh

1 MGNREGA Rural Development Dep. Employment 2005

Jasvantgadh

40



dam) 2005 18

3 TSC Rural Development Dep. Toilet Facility 2005-2012 358


5 IAY Rural Development Dept. House Facility 2008-2012 40

6 SGSY Rural Development Dept. Employment 2008-2012 30

Masal

1 WASMO Govt. of Gujarat Drinking water facility 2005-2006

Masal

3



dam) 2005-2006 4

3 IAY Rural Development Dept. House Facility 2007-2008 8


5 SGSY Rural Development Dept. Employment 2010-2011 5

6 TSC Rural Development Dep. Toilet Facility 2010-11 44

Ratanpur


Ratanpur

9

2 SGSY Rural Development Dep. Employment 1995 4

3 Irrigation Govt. of Gujarat Irrigation water 1996-1997 22

4 TSC Rural Development Dep. Toilet Facility 2005 9



Umedgadh

1 IAY Rural Development Dep House Facility 1995

Umedgadh

40

2 SGSY Rural Development Dep. Employment 1995 12


Irrigation

water(Checkdam) 2005 8

4 TSC Rural Development Dep. Toilet Facility 2005 148



(Source: GP & Talati)

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

Sr.

No

.

Projec

t

name

Year

started

Name

of

villages

No. of

micro

watersh

ed

Watersh

ed codes

Area

under

treatment

Fundin

g source

Nodal

agency PIA

Total

cost

Expenditure

incurred up

to start of

IWMP

%

financial

completion

% physical

completion

1

Not

any

Project

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Chapter- 2

Project Implementation Agency

2.1 Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNL). PIAs would be

responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State /

Central, Governments, Government Institutes / Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organization (VOs) The PIA of Jasvantgadh

watershed Project (IMWP) is District watershed development Unit (DWDU) Sabarkantha.

2.2 District Watershed Development Unit, Sabarkantha

The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Sabarkantha is a district level nodal agency and was established on 1St

April 2008 to oversee for

then smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU

have dedicated and experience staffs comprising one project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department) a technical expert (on contract basis)

and multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert, computer operator, civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system analyst,

surveyor, and accountant are recruited. The DWDU Sabarkantha staffs are sitting with the District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) at Bahumali

Building, C-block, Ground Floor, Himatnagar-Sabarkantha. The objective of the DWDU Sabarkantha are supervising, planning, implementing,

documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related development activities in the district. Moreover, the DWDU Sabarkantha will

work as a PIA for some IWMP projects.

2.3 Programmes / Projects running in the district

At present 21 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for the Sabarkantha district. The Entry Point Activities of first 12 IWMP

projects has almost completed and work phase work has been started in all the project of the 2009-10 & 2010-11 projects. In 2009-10 projects 4 project

being PIA were Forest Dept. (IWMP 1, 2, 3&6) and in 2 projects DWDU (IWMP 4&5) were PIA respectively. In 2010-11 we have other six project

were sanctioned for district Sabarkantha in which Forest Dept. as PIA for the 2 projects (IWMP-8 & 9) and DWDU-self is as PIA for the 4 projects

(IWMP-7,10,11 & 12). Apart from the running 12 IWMP projects, total 135 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DPAP & IWDP) has been sanctioned and

out of that 30 projects are completed and 110 projects are still running in the district. The DWDU Sabarkantha is also monitoring a central government

sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells” in the district.

Table no. 6: PIA:

Sr No. Name of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-14 project

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agency

(ii) Name of organization DWDU, Sabarkantha

(iii) Designation & Address Project Manager, DWDU, Sabarkantha

(iv) Telephone (02772)241666

(v) Fax (02772)242636

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

Sr. No. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 Shri B.B Patel 54 Male Project

Director B.Sc (Physics) 24 years

Project Management 560000.00

2 Prashant Dhanula 26 Male Technical

Expert

MBA in

Marketing 1.6 years


3 Sidharth Singh

Bisen 29 Male

Technical

Expert

MBA in Rural

Mgmt 2.6 years


4 Malava Bhavsar 21 Male MDT( Eng) Civil Eng. 7 months SMC development 15000.00

5 Sunil Patel 22 MDT (Agri) M.R.S 8 months Agriculture 9000.00

mailto:[email protected]

Development

6 Hiral Patel 28 Female MDT (CM) B.R.S 8 years Community

Mobilization 12000.00

7 Sweety Patel 32 Female MDT (CM) M.S.W 8Years Community

Mobilization 12000.00

8 Hidayat Menon 27 Male MDT (MIS) B.E( IT) 3 years Project Data

Management 15000.00

9 Nayan Patel 23 Male System Analyst MCA 6 months System Management 8000.00

10 Deepak Patel 28 Male MDT Account M.Com 5.8 yeas Manage the District

Account 15000.00

11 Disha Prajapati 28 Female Data Entry

Operator PGDCA 1 year Operator 6000.00

12 Bhaveshchand

Ravat 25 Male Office Assistant B.A 5 months Office Assistant 3500.00

13 Manhor Sinh 36 Male Peon 10th

Pass 6 years Peon 4500.00

Table No. 7.1 Staff at Cluster Level

Sr.

No. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned

Monthly

remuneration

1 Prashant Dhanula 26 Male

Technical

Expert

MBA in

Marketing 1.6 years Project

Management 25000.00

2 Sheth Naziya .M 26 F WDT ENG.

Diploma In

Civil Eng. 4.7years 05/11/2011 12000

3 Patel Dipak .S 29 M WDT AGR B.R.S./M.S.W 2 Years 05/11/2011 8000

4 Parmar Hasumatiben

.H 36 F WDT. CO B.R.S./M.A 7 Years 5/11/2011 8000

2.4 SWOT analysis of the DWDU:

Strength

1. Well establishment of PRIs for social audits Independent District Level Nodal Agency (DWDU). With Dedicated competent and experienced

personnel.

2. Separate State Level Nodal Agency (Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency) for Planning and fund Dispersion.

3. Use multidisciplinary teams and with more holistic approaches using modern technology like GIS & Remote Sensing (RS).

4. Strong linkages with national and state level Institutions, State Agricultural Universities, North Gujarat University KVKs and NGOs for capacity

building and technical guidance.

5. District level monitoring, coordination & co-operating Committee (DLCCC).

6. Extensive grassroots coverage at district- and village-level with project office in cluster level and village office at village level.

7. Amalgamation of Various technological, academic and social institutions for programme support.

8. Participatory planning involving more grassroots contact. Bottom-up approaches ensures effective grassroots and community participation.

9. Allocation of financial resources to the community hence planning and Implementation by community with a Project Implementation Agency

for technical and Logistical support.

10. Programme is more flexible and is adjusted to changing needs and environmental factors for making a sustainable and measurable outcome

Weakness:

1. Lack of technical knowledge in new Personnel.

2. Permanent Office Building is lacking

3. High staff turnover since there is no permanent staff.

4. Inadequate budgets as majority of area is rain-fed and highly scarce natural resources.

5. Numerous but uncoordinated developmental interventions resulting from secluded and untenable output.

6. Duplication and repetition of projects without measuring output and gap analysis.

7. Community participation suffers due to conflicts, counterproductive thinking and Lack of leadership for effective community mobilisation.

Opportunities:

1. Cooperation between the public and private sectors.

2. Improved collaboration and efficiency through departmental convergence.

3. Greatly improved understanding of community needs through participatory planning and implementation would show greater accountability and

impact of work.

4. Small independent decision-making units like village Watershed committee, SHG federation will facilitate quick decision-making and greater

flexibility in programme implementation.

5. Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities.

6. Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities.

Threats:

1.Lack of Sustainable agriculture development

2.Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority.

3.The outcome of the project is heavily dependent on monsoon making it vulnerable.

4.Unfavourable socio-economic environment threatens operations and survival of the project.

5.Contribution and cooperation from local peoples were reduced due non timely payments

6.Low and erratic rainfall in the project area.

7.Low literacy rate in the project area.

Chapter: 3

Basic Information of Project Area

3.1 Basic Information of Project Area

Jasvantgadh watershed is located in the Idar taluka of Sabarkantha district which about 45 km from district headquarters. The project area is

characterized by high temperature and low rainfall. The proposed watershed has a land area of 4629.70 ha will be treated. The Jasvantgadh

watershed project is characterized by low land and heavy runoff of soil with varying slopes. The soil and underground water is highly saline

which results in acute shortage of drinking water at lean period.

3.2 Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Jasvantgadh watershed is about 5096.90 ha out of which 4167.60 ha is Agriculture land area which is about

81.76% of land under is agriculture which is completely rain-fed mainly a Kharif crop and 30 to 40% of Rabi crop were taken. About 851.4ha

of the total land are classified under wasteland of which 53.88% is cultivable and rest is uncultivable 46.11%. Total agricultural lands were classified

under watershed area.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

Sr. No. Names of

villages

Geographical

Area of the

village

Forest Area Land under

agricultural use Rain fed area

Perm-anent

pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

cultivable

1 Barvav 460.70 0 360.90 360.90 0 73.1 26.7

2 Budheli 577.70 0 357.30 357.30 0 75.1 145.3

3 Khaski 329.30 0 228.0 228.0 0 23.4 0

4 Jasvantgadh 1620.40 0 1416.60 1416.60 0 163.2 40.6

5 Masal 655.00 0 596.30 596.30 0 43.8 14.9

6 Ratanpur 693.30 0 589.0 589.0 0 48.6 55.7

7 Umedgadh 760.50 0 619.50 619.50 0 31.6 109.4

TOTAL 5096.90 0 4167.60 4167.60 0 458.80 392.60

3.3 Soil and topography:

Jasvantgadh Watershed Project falls under North West Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly loam and Sandy loam. The soil is light

brown to Dark greyish or black in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 30 to 65 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy,

sand, silt and clay. The soil fertility is poor with moderate nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. By large soils are well drained with moderate water holding

capacity. There has a considerable reduce application of farm yard manure and use of the chemical fertilizer which resulting in reduction in moisture retention

capacity and porosity in the soils. Due to low organic carbon, lack of water conservation measures at the field and at the community level has led to the

acceleration of environmental degradation. The increasing dependency on external input has increased the vulnerability of agriculture such that even small

stresses and fluctuations in the environment lead to instability and threatens farming livelihoods. The soil falls in Aridsol and Inseptisols order, topography

of the area is flat.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

Sr.

No.

Name of the Agro-climatic zone

covers project area Area in ha

Names of the villages

Major soil types Topography

a)Type b) Area in ha

1 North Gujarat (N:G)

460.70 Barvav Black Cotton soil,

Morrum 434.00

Flat Land

577.70 Budheli Black Cotton soil,

Morrum 432.40 Flat Land

329.30 Khaski Black Cotton soil,


1620.40 Jasvantgadh Black Cotton soil,


655.00 Masal Black Cotton soil,


693.30 Ratanpur Black Cotton soil,


760.50 Umedgadh Black Cotton soil,


5096.90

4629.70

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr. No Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Barvav

No Flood/Drought Condition

2 Budheli

3 Khaski

4 Jasvantgadh

5 Masal

6 Ratanpur

7 Umedgadh

3.4 Edaphic Factors

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off

(mm/ year)

Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/

year)

Water erosion

A Sheet

1763.4 1162 2-3 B Rill

C Gully

Sub-Total

Total 1763.4 1162 2-3

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

Barvav - 7.5 TO 8.0 Inherent

Budheli - 7.5 TO 8.0 Inherent

Khaski - 7.5 TO 8.0 Inherent

Jasvantgadh - 7.5 TO 8.0 Inherent

Masal - 7.5 TO 8.0 Inherent

Ratanpur - 7.5 TO 8.0 Inherent

Umedgadh - 7.5 TO 8.0 Inherent

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Barvav Nil

Due to Black cotton Soil water logging

condition occurred after heavy rain.

Budheli Nil

Khaski Nil

Jasvantgadh Nil

Masal Nil

Ratanpur Nil

Umedgadh Nil

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Name of

project

Average rainfall- last 5 years Average temperature

Year mm Summer Winter

IWMP-14

(Jasvantgadh)

Max Min Max Min

2008 487 43 25 33 24

2009 589 43 24 34 22

2010 678 45 27 35 26

2011 691 44 24 34 21

2012 710 44 24 36 24

Jashwantgard watershed project area totally depended on the rainfall. In this area rainfall is good for kharif and early rabi crops. The average rainfall of

this area is about 631 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 710 mm. Area faces continual crop failure that comes on whenever there is a

shortfall in the total quantum of rain. However, even more serious are the gaps in rain even in years when the total rainfall is considered normal. These gaps at crucial

periods in the crop growth cycle can prove fatal for the crop. However, through careful water harvesting, in-situ moisture conservation and a drought-proofing

strategy of dry land agriculture, these gaps can easily be plugged and the crops saved.

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Project name Elevation (MSL) Slope range (%) Major streams

IWMP-14 Jasvantgadh 194 m 0-5 % Debhol Stream

3.5 Land and Agriculture

The average land holding is about2 to 3 ha, the main crops under agriculture are cotton, maize jowar castor, wheat, funnel and fodder grass.

Farmers take up rain-fed castor if the rains are good and being gone for the maize cropping in winter season. But when low rain fall occurs then there is

lack of surface water source for sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose in summer season. The average land holding is about 2 to 3

ha mostly rain-fed in nature. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the

demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Cotton, castor, wheat, gram and cumin. Sorghum is primarily grown

for fodder purpose only. Cotton is the main cash crop in this region. It is grown in alternate year with available irrigation facility. It is also grown

without irrigation in some areas but the yield varies thereafter. Some of the farmers take up rain-fed castor crop if rainfall is good. The land conservation

measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop of mustard or cumin in the residual moisture.

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sr.

No. Village

Total owned land (ha) HHs giving land on

lease

HHs taking

land on lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Barvav 167 138 50

- 0 0

2 Budheli 90 152 18

- 0 0

3 Khaski 16 100 10

- 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 432 134 311

- 0 0

5 Masal 210 41 64

- 0 0

6 Ratanpur 440 82 128

- 0 0

7 Umedgadh 390 50 139

- 0 0

1745 697 720

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sr. No. Village Net sown area (ha)

One time Two times Three times

1 Barvav 345 140

-

2 Budheli 400 140

-

3 Khaski 210 80

-

4 Jasvantgadh 1300 800

-

5 Masal 595 180

-

6 Ratanpur 590 200

-

7 Umedgadh 615 270

-

Total 4055 1810

-

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sr.

no Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability

months Net area

Gross

area

Availability

months

Net area

(ha)

Gross

area (ha)

Availability

months

Net area

(ha)

Gross

area (ha)

1 Barvav - - - - - - 8 0 40

2 Budheli - - - - - - 7 0 80

3 Khaski - - - - - - 7 0 80

4 Jasvantgadh - - - - - - 8 0 80

5 Masal - - - - - - 7 0 67

6 Ratanpur - - - - - - 7 0 78

7 Umedgadh - - - - - - 8 0 66

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 491

Table no. 17: Crop details:

Sr.

No. Village Kharif (Monsoon)

Crop 1(Cotton ) Crop 2 (Jowar) Crop 3 (Maize)

Area (Ha) Production (Kg.) Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

1 Barvav 190 155800 8.2 61 40260 6.6 - - -

2 Budheli 200 149000 7.45 25 13500 5.4 - - -

3 Khaski 155 131285 8.47 20 9400 4.7 - - -

4 Jasvantgadh 835 618735 7.41 90 52200 5.8 70 80500 11.5

5 Masal 400 256000 6.4 37 26270 7.1 10 9800 9.8

6 Ratanpur 360 219600 6.1 100 55000 5.5 - 0

7 Umedgadh 330 211200 6.4 80 44800 5.6 55 46200 8.4

Total 2470 1780870 7.21 431 241360 5.6 135 56700 4.2

Sr.

No. Village Rabi (Winter)

Crop 1(Wheat) Crop 2 (Castor) Crop 3 (Vegetables)

Area

(Ha)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

Area

(Ha)

Production

(Kg.)

Productivity

(qt/ha)

1 Barvav 60 50400 8.40 70 23800 3.4 0 0 0

2 Budheli 75 55500 7.40 150 61500 4.1 0 0 0

3 Khaski 45 36450 8.10 35 10850 3.1 0 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 430 318200 7.40 325 138125 4.25 0 0 0

5 Masal 70 37800 5.40 80 34000 4.25 0 0 0

6 Ratanpur 70 45150 6.45 130 54600 4.2 0 0 0

7 Umedgadh 120 78600 6.55 150 48750 3.25 0 0 0

Total 870 617700 7.10 940 357200 3.8 0 0 0

Sr.

No Village Zaid (Summer)

Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 3

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Barvav 0 - - - - - - - -

2 Budheli 0 - - - - - - - -

3 Khaski 0 - - - - - - - -

4 Jasvantgadh 0 - - - - - - - -

5 Masal 0 - - - - - - - -

6 Ratanpur 0 - - - - - - - -

7 Umedgadh 0 - - - - - - - -

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sr.

No. Village Buffalo Cow

Total Milk

(Buffalo+

Cow)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

Nos. Milk/lit/

(Day) Nos.

Milk/lit

(Day)

Milk/liter

(day) No

Milk/day

(lit)

1 Barvav 142 710 176 1056 1766 9 22.5 0 22 0 0

2 Budheli 176 880 34 204 1084 0 0 0 29 0 0

3 Khaski 131 655 22 132 787 11 27.5 0 30 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 2004 10020 994 5964 15984 0 0 0 298 0 0

5 Masal 146 730 156 936 1666 0 0 0 82 0 0

6 Ratanpur 544 2720 271 1626 4346 0 0 0 138 0 0

7 Umedgadh 194 970 106 636 1606 55 137.5 0 60 0 0

Total 3337 16685 1759 10554 27239 75 187.5 0 1417 0 0

Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sr.

No. Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water

Availability in

months Quality

1 Barvav 40 Open Wells, Bore 8 Potable

2 Budheli 40 Open Wells, Bore 7 Potable

3 Khaski 40 Open Wells Bore 7 Potable

4 Jasvantgadh 40 Open Wells Bore 8 Potable

5 Masal 40 Open Wells Bore 7 Potable

6 Ratanpur 40 Open Wells Bore 7 Potable

7 Umedgadh 40 Open Wells Bore 8 Potable

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

Sr.

No.

Names of

project

CPR

Particulars

Total Area (ha)

Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons

Govt.

(specify

deptt.)

PRI

Any other

(Pl.

Specify)

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

(specify

deptt.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

1. IWMP-14

Jasvantgadh

Wasteland/ degraded land -- 317.40 - - - - -- -

Pastures - 95.42 - - - - -- -

Orchards - - - - - - -- -

Village Woodlot - - - - - - -- -

Forest - - - - - - -- -

Village Ponds/ Tanks - 10.90 - - - - -- -

Community Buildings - 29.35 - - - - -- -

Weekly Markets - - - - - - -- -

Permanent markets - - - - - - -- -

Temples/ Places of worship - 0.31 - - - - -- -

Others (Pl. specify) - 31.23 - - - - -- -

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr.

No. Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Barvav 793 409 384 230 120 110 22.20 4 2 2 0.39

2 Budheli 785 424 361 80 50 30 6.4 0 0 0 0

3 Khaski 610 339 271 48 25 23 4.0 0 0 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 3432 1782 1650 1360 700 660 37.24 24 14 10 0.66

5 Masal 1010 517 493 286 150 136 22.43 0 0 0 0

6 Ratanpur 1665 894 771 545 270 275 26.70 0 0 0 0

7 Umedgadh 1826 998 828 615 323 292 27.35 04 2 2 0.18

Total 10121 5363 4758 3164 1638 1526 146.32 32 18 14 1.23

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sr. No. Village Literacy Literacy % above

age 14

Literacy % below

age 14 Total % Male % Female %

1 Barvav 793 70.80 531 51.25 505 48.74 58.29 31.51

2 Budheli 785 65.75 702 56.16 548 43.84 47.14 47.11

3 Khaski 610 55.00 684 57.00 516 43.00 42.91 49.56

4 Jasvantgadh 3432 78.25 1833 50.19 1819 49.81 55.21 41.25

5 Masal 1010 78.62 710 55.69 565 44.31 47.14 49.12

6 Ratanpur 1665 71.53 192 9.41 949 46.50 47.12 55.17

7 Umedgadh 1826 62.41 1131 50.31 1117 49.69 51.41 37.58

Total 10121 70.14 5783 57.14 6019 59.47 48.42 43.45

Table no. 23: Migration details

Sr.

No. Village

Total

population

Migration Migration by months

Main reason

for migration

Income

during

migration /

month

Total Male Female Up to 3

months

3-6

months

More than

6 months

1 Barvav 793 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Budheli 785 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Khaski 610 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 3432 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Masal 1010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Ratanpur 1665 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Umedgadh 1826 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 10121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table no. 24: Poverty

Sr. no Village Total Household BPL % of BPL

HH

Total Land less

HH

% of land less

HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Barvav 170 1 11 12 7.06 34 20.00

2 Budheli 176 2 21 23 13.07 4 2.27

3 Khaski 143 1 5 6 4.20 10 6.99

4 Jasvantgadh 720 39 180 219 30.42 78 10.83

5 Masal 270 10 28 38 14.07 31 11.48

6 Ratanpur 400 35 105 140 35.00 66 16.50

7 Umedgadh 460 2 38 40 8.70 111 24.13

Total 2339 90 388 478 20.44 334 14.28

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sr

.

N

o.

Village

Pucc

a

road

to

the

villa

ge

(Y/N

)

Schools

College

s

(Numbe

r)

Post

Office

(Distanc

e)

Banks

(Numbe

r)

Distan

ce

from

nearest

market

yard

Milk

collecti

on

centre

(Numbe

r)

Milk

cooperati

ve

(Number

)

Other

cooperati

ves / CBIs

(Number)

Any

other

instituti

on

LP UP HS

1 Barvav Y Y Y N N 0 0 7 1 0 0 0

2 Budheli Y Y Y N N 0 0 14 1 0 0 0

3 Khaski Y Y N N N 0 0 12 1 0 0 0

4 Jasvantga

dh Y Y Y Y N 0 1 16 1 0 0 0

5 Masal Y Y Y N N 0 0 10 1 0 0 0

6 Ratanpur Y Y Y Y N 0 0 11 1

7 Umedgad

h Y Y Y Y N 0 0 12 1

Total 0 0 33 1 0 0 0

3.6 Infrastructure Facilities: All villages of the watershed area where well connected to the C.C road with Idar taluka. All villages have electricity.

Villages have lower primary school and health centre. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go at Jasvanthgard, Umedhgardh

and Ratanpur villages of and for college they to Idar, Himmatnagar and Vadali talukas, which is about 30-35 kilometres away on an average from the

almost all the villages this particular cluster. Agriculture and animal husbandry is main source of their income and apart from these their income

depends on labouring and some of from services. recruit

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sr.

No. Village

HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs

with TV

set

HHs with

cooking

gas

HHs

with

Drinking

water

HHs

with

fridge Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Barvav 170 150 25 201 80 5 148 100 170 85

2 Budheli 176 147 10 180 45 6 128 85 176 38

3 Khaski 143 85 5 98 36 3 65 35 143 25

4 Jasvantgadh 720 500 352 955 455 45 546 403 720 585

5 Masal 270 240 50 341 190 22 215 138 270 232

6 Ratanpur 400 325 70 412 270 32 290 226 400 247

7 Umedgadh 460 298 82 498 325 28 320 215 460 250

Total 2339 1745 594 2685 1401 141 1712 215 2339 1462

Table no. 27: Income

Sr. No. Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Agri.+AH Casual

labour

Others

(services &

business)

Total

1 Barvav 4922000 128000 125450 237000 954300 6366750

2 Budheli 1083200 356000 245200 210000 88600 1983000

3 Khaski 2637000 560000 1189500 102000 148000 4636500

4 Jasvantgadh 3240000 5106000 2445500 3829000 835300 15455800

5 Masal 2858000 1924000 1472400 673000 314000 7241400

6 Ratanpur 1042700 316000 1484000 1275000 562900 4680600

7 Umedgadh 4544000 1184000 2915000 2872100 522250 12037350

Total 20326900 9574000 9877050 9198100 3425350 52401400

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr.

No. Village

Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2 Benefit type 2 Total

income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Barvav 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Budheli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Khaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Masal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Ratanpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Umedgadh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr.

No. Village

Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal

husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture

+ AH

Casual

labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Barvav 170 69 13 24 34 18 5 7

2 Budheli 176 106 11 26 4 15 8 6

3 Khaski 143 84 19 11 10 11 6 2

4 Jasvantgadh 720 364 48 64 78 89 28 49

5 Masal 270 122 9 20 31 58 16 14

6 Ratanpur 400 168 21 41 66 56 21 27

7 Umedgadh 460 198 32 29 92 49 24 36

Total 2339 1111 153 215 315 296 108 141

3.7 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of

land. Productivity can be calculated as dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.”

Data are made available by the Baseline survey, Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006 (For Gujarat and India), and Final district

plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (SK). The results indicate that the cluster villages have comparatively lower productivity compared to Gujarat.. The

productivity is low not only because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but also due lack to of source of

irrigation, salty water and scarcity of rain.

The IWMP-14 villages come under Semi-arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow

high value crops like Cotton, Castor, and Groundnut etc. In case of low rainfall they go for Pulses, and pearl millet. So we can say that monsoon decides

cropping patterns of the villages.

3.8 The IWMP-14 project has low productivity because of the following reasons

i) Full dependence on monsoon:

Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility,100% of the total cultivated area depends on the

uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production.The

rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate rainfall.

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a

times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.

iii) Traditional farming methods:

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple

cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to

low productivity.

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers in some villages use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed

drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.

v) Lack of finances for farmers:

Most of the farmers are marginal or small farmers in the villages. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery

and other inputs.

vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land

productivity. In Jasvantgadh Project, there are mainly two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in

irrigated condition. But in Jasvantgadh Project 80 per cent of land depend on rainfall. Second is mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers

especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.

vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:

10-15% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So they sell it to local

traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face two problems in which first is proper means of transportation and roads and second

problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.

Chapter 4

Watershed Activity

4.1 Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These

regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration.

Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common

guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

4.2 Scientific Planning

i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Jashvantgadh Project

consists of seven micro watersheds 5F2D6c3f, 5F2D6dlf 5F2D6dlg 5F2D6dle, 5F2D6c2g, 5F2D6c2h, 5F2D6c2e with

their respective codes.

ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark

for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which

involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census

survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the

details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population,

and net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, wells in

the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological

Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and

monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource

mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and

watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn

diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for of forestation), Fodders crops, various institutions and their significance

in the life of the farmers.

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-

morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all

given proper weight age according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

An action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent,

soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was

used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map of

vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures.

c) Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink and Flow accumulation. This model

verlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human

error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

Sr.

No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used

(A) Planning

1 Cluster approach Yes

2 Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute No

3 Baseline survey Yes

4 Hydro-geological Survey Yes

5 Contour mapping Yes

6 Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

7 Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes

8 Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

9 Online IT connectivity between Yes

10 Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

11 DRDA and SLNA Yes

12 SLNA and DoLR Yes

(B)Availability of GIS layers

1 Cadastral map Yes

2 Village boundaries Yes

3 Drainage Yes

4 Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5 Land use Yes

6 Ground water status Yes

7 Watershed boundaries Yes

8 Activity Yes

9 Crop simulation models# Yes

10 Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil

nutrient analysis

Yes

11 Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# Yes

12 Weather Station Yes

(B) Inputs Yes

1 Bio-pesticides No

2 Organic manures No

3 Vermi compost No

4 Bio-fertilizer No

5 Water saving devices No

6 Mechanized tools/ implements No

7 Bio-fencing No

8 Nutrient budgeting No

9 Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

10 Any other (please specify) No

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sr. No. Name of the PRA

Activity / FGD

Date Number of people

present

Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

1 Social map 07-04-2012 Barvav-102 Make aware about geographical land.

2 Drainage map Make aware about Drainage of villages. Too much of soil

erosion in monsoon.

3 Daily activity chart Mostly all women are engaged with animals, and man was

engaged with farming and labour work.

4 Seasonal chart Majority of farming work related of cereals & cash crop.

1 Social map 11-04-2012 Budheli-78 Make aware about geographical land. Having two peta para.

2 Drainage map Make aware about Drainage of villages.



4 Seasonal chart Majority of farming work related of cash crop , Vegetables

& fruits.

1 Social map 16-4-2012 Khaski-93 Make aware about geographical land that there are three other

peta para in revenue village.


erosion in monsoon.




1 Social map 20-4-2012 Jasvantgadh -72 Make aware about geographical land.


erosion in monsoon.




1 Social map 17-04-2012 Masal -104 Make aware about geographical land.


erosion in monsoon.




1 Social map 10-4-2012 Ratanpur -79 Make aware about geographical land.


erosion in monsoon.




1 Social map 18-04-2012 Umedgadh -104 Make aware about geographical land.


erosion in monsoon.




Problem Analysis Tree

Poor Life Style Migration

LOW SOCIO-ECONOMIC

STATUS

Low Income Unemployment Local self Governance not dynamic or inclusive

Low Agricultural

Production

Low Market Price of

the Product

Low Literacy

Status

Less Orientation for

self employment

Local Leadership

not sufficiently

developed

Lack of common

interest to support

and strength the

local governance

Poor

Cropping

pattern

Less Fertile Soil

Soil Erosion

Natural Misfortunes Lack of

irrigation

Facilities

Less

availability of

water

Lack of

resource for

irrigation

Lack of appropriate

market linkage

Lack of co-

operation

between farmers

Presence of

middle man

Lack of

Entrepreneurial

skill

Lack of

Information

and training

Low representation

of Weakest in real

term

Lack of Grass

root Peoples

Organisation

Objective Tree

Improvement in life style Less Migration/Comfort Migration

Improvement in socio-economic status

Increase in Individual income Generate the Opportunity of self

employment

e

Presence of dynamic local self governance

Increase in

Agricultural

Productivity

Good Market price of

the product Less Orientation for

self employment

Well established

Local Leadership

Increase common

interest to support

and strength the

local governance

Improved

Agricultural

Practices

Wadi

Development

Programme

Availability of water

and resources for

irrigation

Water resource

Management,

watershed

development

Elimination of

Middleman and

Increase the Co-

operation between

farmers

Capacity Building

and Awareness

programme and

formation of PO’s

Capacity Building

and skill

improvement

programme

Setup

Microenterpris

e

Facilitate milk

production as

an income

generating

activity

Increase the

representation of

weakest in real term

Presence of

people’s

Organisation

Training

and

Awareness

4.3 Institution building

i) Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This

committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the

secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in all the village .The watershed has divided into 7 villages

namely Barvav (434.0 ha), Budheli (432.40 ha),Khaski (254.70 ha), Jasvantgadh (1579.80 ha) , Masal (640.10 ha) Ratanpur (637.60) Umedgadh (651.10)

so separate watershed committees was formed in the project. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT. The watershed

committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period.

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details

Sr.

No.

Names of WCs Date of

Registrat

ion as a

Society

(dd/mm/

yyyy)

Designat

ion

M/

F

S

C

S

T

S

F

MF LF Land-

less

U

G

SH

G

GP Any

othe

r

Education

al

qualificati

on

Function/s

assigned#

Barvav

1 Patel Bhikhabhai

Jivabhai

President M √ 7 Pass

2 Patel Kesubhai

Kodarbhai

Secretary M √ S.Y.BA

3 Thakor Ramjibhai

Mohanbhai

Member M √ 8 Pass

4 Prajapati Ramesbhai

Maganbhai

Member M √ √ 8 Pass

5 Vankar Murabhai

Kodarbhai

Member M √ 5 Pass

6 Patel Kokilaben

Prakasbhai

Member F √ M.A.Bed

7 Parmar Hansaben

Prakasbhai

Member F √ 10 Pass

8 Parmar Damyantiben

Jayantibhai

Member F √ 10 Pass

9 Thakor Kokilaben

Vinodkumar

Member F √ 5 Pass

10 Sheth Naziya Mohmad

Aarif

WDT

Engg.

F √ Civil Eng.

11 Dhanula Prasantbhai

Dhurjibhai

Nodal

Officer

M √ M.B.A.

Budheli

1 Thakarda Kuvarji

Sankarji

President M √ 10 Pass

2 Rathod Rajendrasingh

Girdarsingh

Secretary M √ √ B.A.

3 Rathod Jayendrasingh

Karansingh

Member M √ √ MSC Bed

4 Chenva Jayantibhai

Lallubhai

Member M √ 12 Pass

5 Patel Bhikhabhai

Shivabhai

Member M √ √ M.A.Bed

6 Patel Bhanuprasad

Dhurabhai

Member M √ 12 Pass

7 Thakarda Sajjanben

Karaji

Member F √ -

8 Rathod Dhirajsingh

Parbatsingh


9 Thakarda Geetaben

Ramesji

Member F √ 7 Pass


Aarif

WDT

Engg.

F √ Civil Eng.

11 Dhanula Prashantbhai

Dhurjibhai

Nodal

Officer

M √ MBA

Khaski

1 Parmar Vikramsingh

Ratansingh

President √ √ MBBS

2 Makvana Babuji

Vaghaji

Secretary √ √ 9 Pass

3 Parmar Balaji Somaji Member √ √ 10 Pass

4 Chavda Madansingh

Ranjitsingh

Member √ √ B.A. Bed

5 Makvana Sangitaben

Kuvarji

Member √ √ 3 Pass

6 Makvana Hiraben

Isvarji

Member √ √ Nil

7 Parmar Ramanji

Ratnaji


8 Chenva Becharbhai

Sedhabhai


9 Makvana Isvarbhai

Devchandbhai


10 Makvana Babuji Sadaji Member √ √ B. Com.


Aarif

WDT

Engg.

√ Civil Eng.


Dhurjibhai

Nodal

Officer

√ MBA

Jasvantgadh

2 Patel KAntibhai

Pitambarbhai

President M √ √ H.S.C.

2 Vankar Rakeshbhai

Lalabhai

Secretary M √ √ B.A

3 Parmar Jagdishbhai

Lallubhai

Members M √ √ H.S.C.

4 Chavada Babusinh

Gobarsinh

Members M √ √ 10 Pass

5 Prajapati Navnitbhai

Motibhai

Members M √ √ H.S.C.

6 Thakor Kamleshbhai

Jagaji

Members M √ √ 9 Pass

7 Raval Gitaben

Sureshbhai

Members F √ √ H.S.C.

8 Pandya Vijyaben

Bharatbhai

Members F √ √ 11 Pass

9 Patel Chandrikaben

Mulajibhai

Members F √ √ 9 Pass


Aarif

WDT

Engg.

F √ Civil Eng.


d

Nodal

Officer

M √ MBA

Masal

1 Ramlavat

Dharamvirsinh

Raguvirsih

President M √ √ S.Y.B.com

2 Patel Haribhai

Becharbhai

Secretary M √ √ BVSC&AH

3 Patel Babubhai Member M √ √ Msc

Jethbhai geologist

4 Patel Mukeshbhai

Haribhai

Member M √ √ S.Y.B.A

5 Thakarda Jitubhai

Punjabhai

Member M √ √ 8 PASS

6 Parmar Narsihbhai

Dhurabhai


7 Mansuri Yunusbhai

Sulemanbhai


8 Chenva Indiraben

Davabhai

Member F √ √ 8 PASS

9 Prajapati Jasodaben

Ranchodbhai

Member F √ √ 7 PASS

10 Vankar Pravinaben

Bhanubhai

WDT

Engg.

M √ √ 9 Pass


Aarif

WDT

Engg.

F √ √ Civil Engg.


d

Nodal

Officer

M √ √ M.B.A.

Ratanpur

1 Patel Babubhai

Sankarbhai

President M √ √ S.S.C.

2 PatelRamanbhai

Bhikhabhai

Secretary M √ √ S.S.C.

3 PatelNandubhai

Dahyabhai

Member M √ √ B.A.

4 SutharNarayanbhai

Dahyabhai

Member M √ √ Civil Engg.

5 Thakarda Prabhaji

Mohanji

Member F √ √ 8 Pass

6 Vankar khanabhai

Arkhabhai

Member F √ √ B.A.

7 Patel Lilaben

Narayanbhai

Member F √ √ 5 pass

8 Parmar Niruben

Mukeshbhai


9 Panchal Gitaben

Girishbhai

Member M √ √ 10 pass

10 Sheth Naziya

Mohmad Aarif

WDT M √ √ Civil Engg.

11 Dhanula

Prasantbhai

Dhurajibhai

Nodal

Officer

M √ √ M.B.A.


d

Nodal

Officer

M √ √ M.B.A.

Umedgadh

Patel Girishbhai

Davabhai President

M √ √ S.S.C.

Rathod Kiritsingh

Raguvirsingh Secretary

M √ √ S.S.C.

Patel Girishbhai

Ramabhai

Member M √ √ B.A.

Patel Premilaben

Vipulkumar

Member M √ √ Civil Engg.

Parmar Mukeshkumar

Kuberbhai


Prajapati Ramilaben

Nareshbhai

Member F √ √ B.A.

Vankar Hirabhai

Khemabhai


Raval Kanubhai

Ramabhai


Dave Pannaben

Dipakbhai

Member M √ √ 10 pass

Sheth Naziya WDT

Engg.

F √ √ Civil Engg.

Mohmad Aarif

DhanulaPrasantbhai

Dhurajibhai

Nodal

Officer

M √ √ MBA

4.4 Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative

especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the

following observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like Seva, Khadi Gram Udyog Sewa Trust, it was planned to have

some capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women

empowerment.

Table no. 33: SHG detail

Sr. No. Name of village

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category

With

only

Men

With only

Women

With

both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Barvav 2 2 4

(i) Landless 10 10 20 10 10 20 2 10 12

(ii) SF 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 3 3

(iii) MF 11 0 11 11 0 11 1 0 1

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 2 2 4

21 20 41 21 20 41 3 13 16

2 Budheli 1 1 0 2

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 10 10 20 10 10 20 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1 1 0 2

10 10 20 10 10 20 0 0 0

3 Khaski 0 2 1 3

(i) Landless 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 0 0

(ii) SF 10 0 10 10 0 10 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 11 0 11 11 0 11 0 0 0

Total 0 2 1 3

21 10 31 21 10 31 0 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 4 8 1 13

(i) Landless 20 20 40 20 20 40 16 5 21

(ii) SF 20 30 50 20 30 50 7 8 15

(iii) MF 0 20 20 0 20 20 0 5 5

(iv) LF 0 20 20 0 20 20 0 0 0

Total 4 8 1 13

40 90 130 40 90 130

23 18 41

5 Masal 2 2 0 4

(i) Landless 10 10 20 10 10 20 3 5 8

(ii) SF 10 0 10 10 0 10 4 0 4

(iii) MF 0 15 15 0 15 15 0 3 3

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 5 0 5

20 25 45 20 25 25 7 8 7

6

Ratanpur

1 5 0 6

(i) Landless 0 20 20 0 20 0 0 5 5

(ii) SF 0 10 10 0 10 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 0 0

(iv) LF 10 10 20 10 10 20 0 0 0

Total

10 51 61 10 51 31 0 5 5

7 Umedgadh

1 4 0 5

(i) Landless 0 20 20 0 20 20 0 5 5

(ii) SF 10 10 20 10 10 20 4 0 4

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 0 0

10 40 50 10 40 50 4 5 9

4.5 User Group (UG) User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the program on a long term basis. The user group

collects user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal

rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 34: UG detail

Sr.

No. Name of village

Total no. of Ugs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Barvav 3 0 3 6

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 17 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 3 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3 0 3 6 31 3 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Budheli 3 0 4 7

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 21 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 15 4 19 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3 0 4 7 36 5 41 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Khaski 5 0 0 5

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 5 0 0 5 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 8 0 13 21 (i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 45 5 50 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 67 13 80 0 3 3 0 3 3

(iv) LF 22 7 29 0 1 1 1 2 3

Total 8 0 13 21 134 25 159 0 4 4 1 5 6

5 Masal 4 0 2 6

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 15 4 19 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 23 2 25 2 0 2 2 0 2

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 4 0 2 6 38 6 44 2 0 2 2 0 2

6

Ratanpur

8 0 4 12

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 21 0 21 2 0 0 2 0 2

(iii) MF 34 3 37 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 18 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 8 0 4 12 73 5 78 0 2 2 2 0 2

7

Umedgadh 3 0 10 13 (i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 20 4 24 6 0 6 6 0 6

(iii) MF 47 7 54 6 0 6 6 0 6

(iv) LF 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 77 11 88 12 0 12 12 0 12

4.6 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the

village community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain important works

which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion

was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity,

it was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 22.22 Lakhs was allotted for EPA

activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed

various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was

conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common

natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of

convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.

EPA Identification

Tableno.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) Sr.

No. Names of Villages Amount earmarked for EPA

Entry Point Activities

planned in Unit Estimated cost

Expected

outcome

1 Barvav

RO Plant for Drinking water Connection Tank 1 No. 1.33

Protection Wall 1 Nos. 0.74

Sub Total 2.08

2 Budheli

Drinking water of PVC Pipe Line 1 No. 1.69

Single Side Stand Post 1 No. 0.38

Sub Total 2.07

3 Khaski

Protection Wall 1 No.

0.68

RCC Bottom Tank 1 No.

0.53

Repairing works for Bottom tank 1 No. 0.06

Sub Total 1.28

4 Jasvantgadh

Over Head Water Tank 1 No. 5.06

Under Ground Sump 1 No.

2.50

Sub Total 7.56

5 Masal

Single Side Stand Post 1 No. 0.43

Drinking water of PVC Pipe Line 1 No.

0.42

Protection Wall 1 No. 2.21

Sub Total 3.06

6 Ratanpur Protection Wall 1 No. 3.06

Sub Total 3.06

7 Umedgadh Protection Wall 1 No. 3.12

Sub Total 3.12

Grand Total 14 No. 22.22

4.7 Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach should

be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 56 percent is allotted for this work. As the average slope of

the watershed is nearly 1-3 percentages, proper ridge to valley approach is not applicable for this watershed. The main constrains in this watershed is

soil erosion, salinity of soil, lack of water harvesting mechanism, drainage of low lying areas and lack of vegetation.

The main treatments in this pasture and non arable land are Earthen Bund with waste weir for discharge of excess water, percolation tank and

village ponds. This generally includes water conservation or surface water storage structures. In arable and personal land the main treatment is planned

for soil erosion. The main treatments are farm bunds, injection well, field outlet and border plantation. Being highly labour intensive, will involve more

of manual labour; so, funds from Mahatma National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MNREGS) can be taken.

Following structures are been proposed in these areas

Ridge Area Treatment

Main objective of ridge area treatment is to Slowing down the velocity of runoff, checking soil erosion and improving local soil moisture profile.

a) Drainage Line Treatment

Main objective of drainage line treatment is to reducing soil erosion, trapping silt which slows the rate of siltation in water harvesting structures

in the lower reaches of the watershed, creating a hydraulic head locally which enhances infiltration of surface runoff into the groundwater

system; and increasing the duration of flow in the drainage line.

b) Land Development

Main objective of land development is to reducing soil erosion by slow down of the runoff, to maintain the soil moisture and to make soil fertile

by different types of treatments.

c) Afforestation/Agro-Forestry/Plantation:

Emphasis is placed on maximizing the use of available land and resources with high yield tree species. Trees can either be of similar species or mixed

in a manner that will result in a stand or forest. Depending on the climate, geographical layout of the area and the soil conditions, trees that have the

greatest growth potential are selected like Neem, Ardusa Mango, Babul and Tamarind

d) Farm Outlet:

Farm outlets are constructed on agricultural land with the aim of arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture profile. Ideally, bunds on farms

should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into irregular sections. In such a

situation, it becomes inconvenient to manoeuvre bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing.

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works

Sr.

No.

Village

name

Name of

structures

Type of treatment Type of land Target

(i) (ii) (iii) (i) (ii)

Commun

ity

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify

)

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt/

Ha)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) Expecte

d

month

& year

of

complet

ion

(mm/yy

yy)

Ridge

area

(R)

Drainage

line

Land

dev.

(L)

Private

(D) M W O T

1 Barvav Deepening

Pond

D 2No. 0 3.20 - 3.20

New Pond D 1No. 3.00 2.00 5.00

Check Dem

Decelting

C 5No. 0 1.11

1.11

Land Leveling L 37Ha

0 1.92 - 1.92

Check Dam D 2No. 4.80 3.20 8.00

Waste Wier D 1 No. 0.84 0.56

- 1.40

Total 8.64 11.99 20.63

2 Budheli De-

siltingCheck

Dam

D 7No. 0 2.62 - 2.62

De-silting

Pond

D 1No. 0 1.60 1.60

New Pond D 1No. 3.30 2.20 5.50

Recharging

bore Well

R 2 No. 0.6 0.4 1.00

Land

Levelling

L 77Ha 0 4.00 - 4.00

Protection

Wall

C 4 No. 1.82 1.21 - 3.03

Total 5.72 12.03 17.75

3 Khaski Check Dam

De-silting

D 5 No. 0 1.67 - 1.67

Land

Levelling

L 15Ha. 0 0.38 0.38

Pond

Deepening

D 03 0 4.64 4.64

Total 6.69 6.69

4 Jasvantgadh Protection Wall C 2No. 1.34 0.90 - 2.24

Stone Pitching D 2028

Sqmt.

4.25 2.84 - 7.09

Waste Wier D 2 No. 1.80 1.20 3.00

Check Dem

Decelting

D 14 No. 0 5.80 5.80

New Pond D 1 No. 3.30 2.20 5.50

Deepening

Pond

D 4 No. 0 6.40 6.40

Recharging

Bore Well

R 9 No. 4.32 2.88 7.20

Check Wall L 16 No. 7.89 5.26 13.15

Check Dam L 4 No. 9.60 6.40 16.00

Land Levelling L 173 Ha 0 8.996 8.996

Total 32.50 42.88 75.38

5 Masal Di-silting

Check Dams

D 4 No. 0 1.61 - 1.61 2014-

15

Deepening

Pond

D 4 No. 0 6.29 6.29 2013-

14,201

5-16

New Pond D 1 No. 3.00 2.00 5.00 2015-

16

Protection

Wall

C 2 No. 2.27 1.52 3.79 2015-

16

Land

Levelling

L 120

Ha.

0 6.24 - 6.24 2014-

15

Total 5.27 17.66 22.93

6 Ratanpur New Pond L P 2 No. 6.00 4.00 10.00

De-silting

Check dam L P

11

No.

0 3.74 3.74

Deepening

Pond L C 4 No. 0 6.40 6.40

Recharging

Bore Well C

2 No. 0.72 0.48 1.20

Check Wall 5 No. 2.50 1.67 4.17

Land

Levelling 24Ha 0 1.25 3.12

Total 9.22 17.54 26.76

7 Uemedgadh De-silting

Check Dam L P

8 No. 0 3.50 -

3.50

West-weir L P 2 No. 1.13 0.76 - 1.89

Protection

Wall L C 2 No. 3.39 2.26 - 5.65

Land

Levelling C 73 Ha 0 3.80 - 3.80

New Pond 2 No. 6.00 4.00 - 10.00

Deepening

Pond 2 No. 0 3.20 - 8.00

Repairing

Check dam 2 No. 1.09 0.72 - 1.81

11.61 18.24 29.85

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas

Check dams:

Check dams are constructed across small streams having gentle slope, the selected should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or weathered

formation to facilitate recharge of stored water within short span of time. The surface water stored in these structures is mostly confined to stream course

and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid scouring from excess runoff water cushions

are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum run off in the stream series of such check dams are to be constructed to have recharge on

regional scale in project villages.

Pond:

Natural or a man-made water body which usually serves the population of a village as well as agriculture fields like ponds greatly vary in size depending

upon the rainfall. These have only a few meters of length and width and are built across the flow path of natural drainage channels. Surplus water from

one pond spills over to a lower pond. In some cases a series of ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs of one farm

and also augments ground water recharge.

Waste weirs:

These are constructed for giving a safe passage to the excess runoff from the field and also store some amount of water in the field. The water stored in

these structures is mostly confined in field and height is normally less than 1 mt. and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall.

Cause cum Check dam:

Cause cum dams was constructed for saving soil, water and it will be used as way to movement of vehicle. Such structures are usually made for the

convenience of connecting community area field also conserved water.

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr.

No. Village name Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimate

d cost No.

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimat

ed cost

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

1 Barvav Pond Deepening 2 2 ha 170000 8.00 - - - - 2 ha 170000 8.00

New Pond - - - - 1 1 ha 90000 5.00 1 ha 90000 5.00

Total 2 2 ha 170000 8.00 1 1 ha 90000 5.00 3 ha 260000 13.00

2 Budheli Pond Deepening 1 2 ha 170000 4.00 2 ha 170000 4.00

New Pond - - - - 1 1ha 90000 5.00 1ha 90000 5.00

Total 1 2 ha 170000 4.00 1 1 ha 90000 5.00 3 ha 260000 9.00

3 Khaski Pond Deepening 1 1 ha 90000 4.00 1 10ha - - 10ha - -

Total 1 1 ha 90000 4.00 - - - - 1 ha 90000 4.00

4 Jasvantgadh Pond deepening 4 4 ha 340000 16.00 - - - - 4 ha 340000 16.00

New Pond - - - - 1 1 ha 90000 5.50 1 ha 90000 5.50

Total 4 4 ha 340000 16.00 1 1 ha 90000 5.50 5 ha 430000 21.50

5 Masal Pond deepening 4 4 ha 340000 15.73 - - - - 4 ha 340000 15.73

New Pond - - - - 1 1 ha 90000 5.00 1 ha 90000 5.00

Total 5 4 ha 340000 15.73 1 1 ha 90000 5.00 5 ha 430000 20.73

6 Ratanpur Pond deepening 4 4 ha 340000 16.00 - - - - 4 ha 340000 16.00

New Pond - - - - 2 2 ha 170000 10.00 2 ha 170000 10.00

Total 4 4 ha 340000 16.00 2 2 ha 170000 10.00 6 ha 510000 26.00

7 Umedgadh Pond deepening 2 2 ha 170000 8.00 - - - - 2 ha 170000 8.00

New Pond - - - - 2 2 ha 170000 10.00 2 ha 170000 10.00

Total 2 2 ha 170000 8.00 2 2 ha 170000 10.00 4 ha 340000 18.00

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr.

No.

Name of

Villages Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing

recharging structures

Construction of new recharging

structures Total target

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Estimated

cost No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Estimated

cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Estimated

cost

1 Barvav

RRWHS - - - - - - - -

Water Storage Tank (Gulabpura - - - - - - - -

Recharge bore well in village pond

- - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - -

2 Budheli Recharge Bore well in Village pond 2 4 ha 1.00 - - - 4 ha 1.00

Total - - - 16 - 8.00 - 8.00

3 Khaski Recharge Bore well in Village pond - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - -

4 Jasvantga

dh Recharge Bore well in Village pond 9 36 ha 7.20 - - - 36 ha 7.20

Total 9 36 ha 7.20 - - - 36 ha 7.20

5 Masal Recharge Bore well in Village

pond - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - -

6 Ratanpur Recharge Bore well in Village

pond 2 4 ha 1.20 - - - 4 ha 1.20

Total 2 4 ha 1.20 - - - 4 ha 1.20

7 Umedgadh Recharge Bore well in Village

pond - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - -

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

S.

No. Name of village Name of activity

Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Private (ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Estimated

cost

(Rs. in

lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

Agriculture Based - - -

1 Barvav

Drip Irrigation - - - SHG 2.16

Vermi Compost - - - SHG 1.80

Low cost Greenhouse - - -- SHG 4.80

Horticulture - - - Individual 0.01

Animal Husbandry - - -

Animal camp - - - Common 1.00

Minor Activity - - -

Vegetable Trolley - - - Individual 0.13

Total - - -

9.90

2 Budheli


Drip Irrigation -- - - Individual 5.52


Agro- Forestry Based - - -

Agro Processing Based - - -

Tomato & Chilli Grading Packing - - - SHG 1.00


Cattle Camp - - - Common 1.50


Culberry Implements - - - Individual 0.04

Total - - - 9.86

3 Khaski Agriculture Based - - -

Vermi compost - - - SHG 1.80

Kitchen Garden - - - Individual 0.14

Drip irrigation - - - SHG 2.64


Cattle Camp - - - Common 0.60


Cotton Plugging Machine SHG 0.50

Handicraft - - - Individual 0.13

Total - - - 5.81

4 Jasvantgadh

Agriculture Based - - --

Vermi Compost -- - - SHG 3.60

Low cost Net house - - - SHG

4.80

Drip Irrigation - - -

Individual

/SHG 18.24

Floriculture - - - Individual

0.20

Agro- Processing Based - - -

Agro Centre - - - SHG 3.00

Vermi Collection Centre - - - SHG 2.40

Animal Husbandry -

Cattle camp - - - Comman 2.00

Minor Activity - - - SHG 1.90

Papad Udyog SHG 0.28

Cotton Plugging machine SHG 1.50

Total - - - 36.02

5 Masal


Drip Irrigation - - - Individual 5.52

Low cost Net house - - - SHG 3.84



Cattle camp - - - common 2.00


Cotton plugging machine SHG 0.50

Flour mill - - -- SHG 0.80

Vegetable -- - - Individual 0.13

Total - - - 14.59

6 Ratanpur

Agriculture Based

Drip Irrigation SHG/ Individual 10.56

Vermi compost SHG 1.80

Horticulture Individual 0.05

Animal Husbandry

Cattle camp COMMAN 1.50

Minor Activity

Cotton plugging machine SHG 0.50

Vegetable Trolley Individual 0.13

TOTAL 14.59

7 Umedgadh

Agriculture Based

Vermi Compost SHG 1.80

Low cost Net house SHG 2.40

Drip Irrigation SHG/I ndividual 4.80

Floriculture - Individual 0.20

Horticulture Individual 0.02

Agro- Processing Based

Agro Centre SHG 4.00

Animal Husbandry

Cattle camp Comman 1.50

Minor Activity

Vegetable Trolley Individual 0.13

TOTAL l 14.85

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

Sr. No. Names of Major activities of the SHGs

Villages

Name of activity

No. of

SHGs

involved

Average annual income

from activity per SHG

1 Barvav Vermi compost, Drip Irrigation, Low Cost Net house

4

20000

2 Budheli Vermi Compost, Tomato Chilli grading packaging 2

15000

3 Khaski Vermi compost ,Drip Irrigation ,Cotton plugging machine 3 12000

4 Jasvantgadh ,Vermi Compost, Drip Irrigation ,Cotton plugging machine, Low cost

net house, Agro centre, Papad udyog

13 30000

5 Masal

Vermi compost ,Cotton plugging machine, Low Cost Net house,

Flour mill

4

15000

6 Ratanpur Vermi compost ,Drip Irrigation ,Cotton plugging machine 6

20000

7 Umedgadh Vermi Compost, Drip Irrigation ,,Low cost net house, Agro centre, 5

20000

37

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level

Sr. No. Village Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkage with Outcome

1 Barvav Vermi compost GLPC Individual farmer, Fertilizer

cooperative

Increase in income and

introduce organic farming

for better soil healths

2 Budheli

Agro Processing Farmer cooperatives

Village Level individual

farmers, agri input

companies

Reduction in food

wastage and increase in

income

Vermi compost GLPC Individual farmer, Fertilizer

cooperative




3 Khaski Vermi compost GLPC Individual farmer, Fertilizer

cooperative






farmers, agri input

companies

Reduction in food


income

4 Jasvantgadh



farmers, agri input

companies

Reduction in food


income


cooperative



for better soil health’s

Agro Center Agro produce market,

Village for agri inputs

Village level individual

farmers, agri input

companies

Quality input at lower

price

5 Masal Vermi compost GLPC Individual farmer, Fertilizer

cooperative




Masal Agro Processing Farmer cooperatives


farmers, agri input

companies

Reduction in food


income

6 Ratanpur



farmers, agri input

companies

Reduction in food


income


cooperative




7 Umedgadh

Agro Center Agro produce market,

Village for agri inputs

Village level individual

farmers, agri input

companies

Quality input at lower

price


cooperative




Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

Sr.

No. Name of village

Name of

structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(D)

(iii)

Land

dev.

(L)

(i)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost

(Rs. in

lakh)

Expected

month & year

of completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1 Barvav

Afforestation

Fodder bank

Fodder

Horticulture C UG 0.01

Others (pl.

specify) - - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - - - -

2

Budheli

Afforestation - - - - - - - - - - -

Fodder bank - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - -

3 Khaski Afforestation - - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - - - -

4 Jasvantgadh Afforestation - - - - - - - - - - -

5

Masal

Fodder bank - - - - - - - - - - -

Others (pl.

specify) - - - - - - - - - - -

Afforestation - - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - - - -

6 Ratanpur Afforestation

Horticulture P UG 0.05

7 Umedgadh Horticulture p UG 0.02

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

Sr. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity

(ha) Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Barvav

- - - - -

2 Budheli - - - - -

3 Khaski - - - - -

4 Jasvantgadh - - - - -

5 Masal - - - - -

6 Ratanpur - - - - -

7 Umedgadh - - - - -

Capacity Building

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or Individual s to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and experience

needed to solve problems and implement changes. There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of

development interventions by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success to take in to account improvements to human

potential. Capacity Building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involved participation of

stakeholders as all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

Sr.

No.

Name of the

Training Institute

Full Address with

contact no., website

& e-mail

Type of

Institute#

Area(s) of

specialization$

Accreditation

details

Trainings

Reference

Year

No. of

trainings

assigned

No. of

trainees to

be trained

1

State Institute of

Rural

Development,

Gujarat

Ahmadabad GOG

Training in

Rural

Development

Schemes

Training

Institute 2011-2016 3 150

2

Development

Support Centre

(DSC)

Ahmadabad NGO

Rural

Development

Training

Training

Centre 2012-13 5 98

3

4 ICECD

E-1/14, Sterling

city,Bopal,

Ahemedabad.

(o)+91-79-3732039

Development

centre

Women

Rural & Tribal

areas, Urban

slum, poor &

low-middle

income

centre of

development

programme

2012-2014 3 108

5 Dantiwada Argil. Dantiwada -

Banaskantha University

Training in

modern and

better

agriculture

practices

Agriculture

University 2010-2015 3 150

6 BISAG BISAG-

GADHINAGAR

Space

application

Remote

Sensing GoG 2010-2015 3 6

7 KVK KVK, Khedbramha,

Dist. Sabarkantha GoG

Agriculture

Science GoG 2011-2012 48 224

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

Sr.

No. District Project Project Stakeholders

Total no. of

persons

No. of persons to be

trained

No. of training

programmes Estimated cost

1 Sabarkantha IWMP-14

PIA 2 2 12

28.788

WDTs 3 3 5

Ugs 176 3

SHGs 54 4

WCs 5 10 4

Total 923 245 28 28.788

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities:

Sr. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Project Information Board PIA-DWDU 4.00

To make aware people more about

project, its work and their

participation.

2 Wall Slogan PIA-DWDU

3 Pamphlet & Posters PIA-DWDU

Chapter 5

Budgeting

BUDGET

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

Sr. No. Budget Component % of the Budget Cost Requirement

A Barvav

1 Administrative costs 10 5.21

2 Monitoring 1 0.52

3 Evaluation 1 0.52

4 Entry Point activity 4 2.08

5 Institution and Capacity Building 5 2.61

6 Detailed Project Report 1 0.52

7 Watershed Development Works 56 29.16

8 Livelihood activities for asset less 9 4.69

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 10 5.21

10 Consolidation phase 3 1.56

TOTAL 100 52.08

B Budheli


2 Monitoring 1 0.52

3 Evaluation 1 0.52








TOTAL 100 51.89

C Khaski


2 Monitoring 1 0.31

3 Evaluation 1 0.31








TOTAL 100 30.56

D Jasvantgadh


2 Monitoring 1 1.89

3 Evaluation 1 1.89








TOTAL 100 189.57

E Masal


2 Monitoring 1 0.77

3 Evaluation 1 0.77








TOTAL 100 76.81

F Ratanpur


2 Monitoring 1 0.77

3 Evaluation 1 0.77








TOTAL 100 76.51

G Umedgadh


2 Monitoring 1 0.78

3 Evaluation 1 0.78








TOTAL 100 78.13

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

Sr.

no. Village

Administrative

Monitoring

and

Evaluation

EPA Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed

development

Work

Livelihood

for asset-

less

Production

system and

Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Barvav 6.25 2.08 2.61 0.52 29.16 4.69 5.21 1.56 52.08

2 Budheli 6.23 2.07 2.59 0.52 29.06 4.67 5.19 1.56 51.89

3 Khaski 3.68 1.22 1.52 0.31 17.11 2.75 3.06 0.91 30.56

4 Jasvantgadh 22.74 7.58 9.48 1.90 106.16 17.06 18.96 5.69 189.57

5 Masal 9.22 3.07 3.85 0.77 43.01 6.91 7.68 2.30 76.81

6 Ratanpur 9.19 3.06 3.82 0.77 42.85 6.88 7.65 2.29 76.51

7 Umedgadh 9.37 3.12 3.92 0.78 43.75 7.03 7.81 2.35 78.13

Total 66.68 22.20 27.76 5.57 311.10 49.99 55.56 16.65 555.55

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sr.

No. Village Total cost requirement

Total funds available under

IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Barvav 29.98 29.16 0.82

2 Budheli 30.08 29.08 1.00

3 Khaski 17.73 17.11 0.62

4 Jasvantgadh 107.16 106.16 1.00

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

Sr. No. Village Phase/ Type of

work

Activity to be

carried out

Fund made

available to

IWMP due to

convergence

(Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with

which

convergence

took place

Reference no. of

activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which

decision for

convergence

was taken

1 Barvav Work phase New Pond 0.82 MGNREGA

livelihood Drip irrigation 41.80 GGRC - -

2 Budheli

Work phase New Pond 1.00 MGNREGA

livelihood Drip irrigation 12.65 GGRC - -

3 Khaski Work phase

Check dam Di-

silting 0.62 MGNREGA

livelihood Drip irrigation 6.05 GGRC

4

Jasvantgadh

Work phase New Pond 1.00 MGNREGA

livelihood Drip irrigation 41.80 GGRC

5 Masal 44.15 43.01 1.14

6 Ratanpur 43.85 42.85 1.00

7 Umedgadh 45.60 43.75 1.85

Total 318.55 311.12 7.43

5 Masal Work phase

Checkdam

Dicelting 0.64 MGNREGA

livelihood Dripirrigation 12.65 GGRC

6 Ratanpur Work phase

New pond 1.00 MGNREGA


7 Umedgadh Work phase

New pond 1.00 MGNREGA


Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S.

No.

Name of

Private Sector

Partner

Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution

Partnership

Interventions

Expected

Outcomes Comments

a)MoU b)Contract c) Any other

(pl. specify) IWMP

Private

sector

1 Not Available - - - -

Chapter-6

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

Employment:

Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principle occupations of the people are agriculture, animal husbandry and casual labour

works. However, agriculture works is more over depends on rainfall so sometimes it suffer due to uneven rainfall in area and they only take single crop

for whole season which keep them engage for only 4-5 months. With uneven rainfall lack of fodder problems comes so animal husbandry is also

indirectly affect. Thus, the people mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

Sr.

NO.

Names of

Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Barvav 2412 0 3681 2611 8704 18 0 27 20 65 25 0 120 25 170

2 Budheli 1876 0 4196 2603 8675 14 0 32 19 65 30 0 110 20 160

3 Khaski 1474 0 2101 1532 5107 11 0 15 12 38 25 0 108 22 155

4 Jasvantgadh 10452 0 11697 9493 31642 78 0 87 71 236 22 0 99 25 146

5 Masal 2948 0 6037 3851 12836 22 0 45 29 96 28 0 85 15 128

6 Ratanpur 2546 0 6408 3837 12791 19 0 47 29 95 22 0 98 10 130

7 Umedgadh 3082 0 6060 3918 13060 23 0 46 29 98 25 0 110 20 155

Total 24790 0 40180 27845 92815 185 0 299 209 693 177 0 730 137 1044

Table no. 53: Seasonal migration from Project area

Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Barvav 0 0 0 0

2 Budheli 0 0 0 0

3 Khaski 0 0 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 0 0 0 0

5 Masal 0 0 0 0

6 Ratanpur 0 0 0 0

7 Umedgadh 0 0 0 0

Table no. 54: Average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

Sr. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)

1 Barvav Open wells 24-160 mt 20-200 mt

Bore wells 30-120 mt 20-280 mt

2 Budheli Open wells 24-160 mt 20-200 mt


3 Khaski Open wells 24-160 mt 20-200 mt


4 Jasvantgadh Open wells 24-160 mt 20-200 mt


5 Masal Open wells 24-160 mt 20-200 mt


6 Ratanpur Open wells 24-160 mt 20-200 mt


7 Umedgadh Open wells 24-160 mt 20-200 mt


Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

Sr.

No.

Names of

Villages

Availability of drinking water

(no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water

Comments

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Barvav 8 12 Potable Potable

2 Budheli 8 12 Potable Potable

3 Khaski 8 12 Potable Potable

4 Jasvantgadh 8 12 Potable Potable

5 Masal 8 12 Potable Potable

6 Ratanpur 8 12 Potable Potable

7 Umedgadh 8 12 Potable Potable

Table no. 56: Crop area and yield in the project area

Sr. No. Name of

village Name of crops

Pre-project Post Project

Area Average Yield (Qtl) per

ha.

Area Average Yield qtl per ha

(ha) (ha)

Kharif

1 Barvav

Cotton 190 35 190 37

Maize - - - -

Juvar 61 25 61 30

Rabi

Wheat 60 50 60 70

Castor 70 24 70 30

Vegetables 10 80 10 90

Kharif

2 Budheli

Cotton 200 35 200 40

Maize - - - -

Juvar 25 25 25 30

Rabi

Wheat 75 40 75 50

Castor 50 25 50 30


Kharif

3 Khaski

Cotton 155 32 155 35

Maize - - - -

Juvar 20 22 20 25

Rabi

Wheat 45 45 45 50

Castor 35 20 35 25


Kharif

4 Jasvantgadh

Cotton 835 35 835 40

Maize 70 20 70 25

Juvar 90 25 90 35

Rabi

Wheat 430 45 430 50

Castor 325 22 325 25


Kharif

5 Masal

Cotton 400 33 400 35

Maize 10 22 10 24

Juvar 37 25 37 27

Rabi

Wheat 70 45 70 48

Castor 80 25 80 27


Kharif

6 Ratanpur

Cotton 360 30 360 33

Maize - - - -

Juvar 100 25 100 27

Rabi

Wheat 70 55 70 57

Castor 130 27 130 29


7 Umedgadh Cotton 330 27 330 29

Maize 55 20 55 22

Juvar 80 22 80 24

Rabi

Wheat 120 50 120 53

Castor 150 25 150 27


Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered

through IWMP

1 Barvav 0 0

2 Budheli 0 0

3 Khaski 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 0 0

5 Masal 0 0

6 Ratanpur 0 0

7 Umedgadh 0 0

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed (Ha)

1 Barvav 0 0

2 Budheli 0 0

3 Khaski 0 0

4 Jasvantgadh 0 0

5 Masal 0 0

6 Ratanpur 0 0

7 Umedgadh 0 0

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of

Village Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project Remarks

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Barvav

Buffalo 142 36000 122400 555 4050 144000

Cow 176 2175 65250 450 2280 68250

Total 318 38175 187650 1005 6330 212250

2 Budheli

Buffalo 176 350 14000 65 455 15600

Cow 34 250 7500 58 355 8800

Total 210 600 21500 123 810 24400

3 Khaski

Buffalo 131 1743 69720 262 1920 70252

Cow 22 525 15750 125 625 16895

Total 153 2268 85470 387 2545 87147

4 Jasvantgadh

Buffalo 1002 4080 163200 200 4150 183200

Cow 497 200 6000 65 300 8000

Total 1499 4280 169200 265 4450 191200

5 Masal

Buffalo 146 702 28080 128 825 30000

Cow 156 280 8400 65 325 8600

Total 302 982 36480 193 1150 38600

6 Ratanpur

Buffalo 544 84 3360 20 125 3800

Cow 271 875 26250 188 900 28250

Total 815 959 29610 208 1025 32050

7 Umedgadh

Buffalo 194 837 33480 85 898 35628

Cow 106 172 5160 55 199 5230

Total 300 1009 38640 140 1097 40858

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

Sr. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

1 Iwmp-14

Jasvantgadh

Backward linkages - - -

Seed certification - - -

Seed supply system - - -

Fertilizer supply system - 3 3

Pesticide supply system - 3 3

Credit institutions - 1 2

Water supply - - -

Extension services - 3 3

Nurseries - - -

Tools/machinery suppliers - 1 2

Price Support system - - -

Labour - - -

Any other (please specify) - - -

Forward linkages - - 2

Harvesting/threshing machinery - 1 2

Storage (including cold storage) - - -

Road network - - -

Transport facilities - - -

Markets / Mandis - - -

Agro and other Industries - 1 2

Milk and other collection centres - - - Labour

Any other (please specify)

CHAPTER -7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system

would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of

those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use

classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc.,

can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is

made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in

the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from

the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective

measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & evaluation System, which will help the ground staff

alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge

of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner.

The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are

then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the

WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent

periods of time.

7.2 Plans for Project management

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the village

level institutes. In Jashvantgard project, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance

of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A

proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major kingpin during post

implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes

mainly fund the following:

7.4 User Charges

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the

formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC)

shall maintain all the records.

Logical framework Analysis

Narrative Summary Indicators Source of verification Assumptions

Goal:

Sustainable Development and

conservation of natural resources

with the help of peoples

participation

Increased Agricultural

Production and overall

development increase in

contribution of agricultural

income to the household

income.

Objective 1

Increase soil moisture content

1.1 Less Uncertainty in

Agricultural Production

1.2 Farmers take two crops in a

year

1.1 Discussion with

Villagers/Farmers

1.2 Soil testing

1.3 Physical verification

Repair and

Maintenance and

taking care of

conservation structures

Output

Soil moisture content will

increase

1.1 Clear growth of vegetation

cover

1.2 Certainty in Kharif, Rabi

crop

Discussion with Villagers/

Farmers

Time to time take care

of structures

Activities

1.1 Farm bunding

1.2 Boulder checks

1.3 Gabions

1.1 40500 rmt

1.2 109 rmt

1.3 9 no


1.2 Records in asset register

1.3 Interferences from GIS maps at

1.1 Money spent on

right time

1.2 Proper scientific

different times

1.4 Measurement Book

methods used

1.3 Workers are ready

1.4 Fields are free from

crops

Objective 2

Increased irrigation potential

2.1 increased irrigated

area

2.2 increase in Land value

2.3 More uncultivable lands to

be brought under agriculture

and new plantation

2.1 Revenue records

2.2 Patwari map

2.3 Maps from GIS

2.1 Judicious use of

water

2.2 Accessibility to

common and forest

lands increased with

removal of

encroachments and

resolution of conflicts

Output

Increased irrigation water

2.1 Increased water table in

wells

2.2 Increase in flow period of

streams



2.3 Interferences from GIS maps

at different times

2.4 Promotion of better irrigation

practices like drip irrigation

2.2 Structures full to its

capacity

2.3 Good amount of

rainfall received

Activities

2.1 Nalla/Gully plug

2.2 Irrigation tank

2.1 15 nos.

2.2 11 nos.



2.1 Good amount of

rainfall

2.2 Size according to

catchment and storage

2.3 Farm ponds

2.4 Repair of old Check dams

2.5 Check dams

2.6 Causeway cum check dam

2.3 130 nos.

2.4 4 no.

2.5 79 nos.

2.6 17

2.3 Interferences from GIS maps

at different times

volume calculation

2.3 No seepage from

structure

Objective 3

To improve Soil Quality

3.1 Agriculture based

livelihood income generation

activities

3.2 Promotion of organic

farming Practices

3.1 Physical verification 3.1 Availability of

waste/mulching

material

Output

Quality of soil improved

3.1 Agriculture production will

increase

3.2 Plantation of fruits and

forest species


3.2 Market Survey

3.3 Soil testing

3.1 Composting

material used and

refilled according to

farm requirement

3.2 Use it in right time

Activities

3.1 Composition

3.2 Application of farm yard

manure

3.3 Use of FYM enriched with

route Phosphate and Bio-

3.1 Nos. Physical verification 3.1 People ready for

voluntary contribution

for Biogas Structure

3.2 Available of cow

dung at right time

3.3 Proper maintenance

Fertilizers

of structures

Objective 4

To increase fodder availability

4.1 Increase in the proportion

of households having more

security of fodder

4.2 Reduction in drudgery of

fodder

Collection especially women

4.1 Survey(Pre and Post) 4.1 Quality of

management of

common property

resources

4.2 Proper distribution

of seedling and take

care

Output

Increased fodder availability

4.1 Health of live stock

improved

4.2 Expected increase in cattle

population

4.3 promotion of dairy

development among

communities

4.1 Expenditure on seedling from

register

4.2 List of beneficiaries from the

register

4.1 Proper seedling

4.2 Proper care and

maintains

Activities

4.1 Pasture land and grassland will

be developed

4.2 On farm bunds selected local

species and fodder crops


4.2 Verification on farm bunds

4.1 WC˜s Reports

4.2 Expenditure Register

4.3 Resolution in WC˜s


4.1 Peoples

participating

4.2 Proper variety

selection

4.3 Social fencing

Objective 5

5.1 Peoples

participation/woman’s socio-

political and economic

empowerment in watershed for

income generation activities

5.1 Women participation

enhanced in decision making of

GVCs

Project to be

implemented and

managed in a

democratic and

participatory way

ensuring equity

Output

5.1 Community Mobilised

5.2 Community Trained

5.3 Better standard of living

5.1 Maintenance of assets and

records by the villagers

themselves.

5.1 Frequent meetings

5.2 Training register

5.3 Increased participation

5.1 Proper training

provided

5.2 No biasness in

villages

Activities

5.1 Formation and strengthening

of village institutions like

women˜s SHG groups/WS/UGs

and WCs through awareness

programmes

5.2 Formation of fodder banks to

increase fodder security and

promote dung development

5.1 Increased awareness

amongst women about village

resources.

5.2 Women participation

enhanced in decision-making

of GVCs.

5.3 Farmers adopt organic

farming practices

5.4 Increased household

5.1 Farmable socio-cultural

conditions at the village

5.2 Checking registers of SHGs

5.3 Checking passbook of groups

5.4 Physical verification of income

generation activities

5.5Posters/banners/meeting

register

5.1 No influence of any

external agency

5.2 Smooth flow of

funds

5.3 Access to

appropriate technology

5.4 Peoples

Participation and

positive perception

5.3 Capacity building of SHG

leaders and accounts

members/farmers/UGs/WCs

through workshop/meetings

5.4 Income generation activities.

5.5 Awareness campaign

income

5.5 improved access to credit to

livelihood purposes.

5.6 Gender sensitization of

UGs and WCs to increase

Inclusiveness of group decision

making

towards the programme

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------x--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

detail project report (dpr) -...

Documents