1

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

ON MALOIBARI INTEGRATED WATERSHED

MANAGEMENT PROJECT OF KAMRUP DISTRICT

UNDER

THE DEPARTMENT OF LAND RESOURCES

MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

NEW DELHI

PREPARED & SUBMITTED

TO

STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT

PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

BY

BS CONSULTANTS 128, RAJGHAR ROAD, 2ND FLOOR

GUWAHATI-781 007

2

PROJECT AT A GLANCE 1. Name of project : Maloibari Integrated Watershed Management Project, Code No. 3B2A2 2. Name of the State : Assam (Code No. 18). 3. Name of the State Level Nodal Agency : Department of Soil Conservation, Govt. of Assam 4. Name of the District : Kamrup(Code No. 7). 5. Name of the Development Block : 1. Dimoria Dev. Block 6. Name of Gaon Panchyats : 1. Tetelia, 2. Hahara,

3. Maloibari, 4. Khetri (part) 7. Numbers of villages covered : 21 Nos. 8. Name of Micro Watershed with Code : 1. Tetelia (3B2A2 i)

2. Hahara (3B2A2 ii) 3. Maloibari (3B2A2 iii)

9. Total Geographical area of the project : 6593 ha. 10. Area proposed to be treated : 4619 ha. 11. Total project cost : Rs. 554.28 Lakhs. 12. Name & Address of Project Manager : Divisional Officer, South Bank Soil Conservation Division, Guwahati. 13. Name & Address of PIA : Divisional Officer, South Bank Soil Conservation Division, Guwahati

3

CONTENTS

Sl. No.

Chapter Particulars Page No.

1 INTRODUCTION 1

2 METHODOLOGY 2-3

3 CHAPTER –I GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE KAMRUP DISTRICT 4-14 Location 4 Administrative Divisions 4 Physical Setting 4 Physiography 4 Slops 5 Drainage Pattern 5 Soils

Climate Monthly Total Rainfall, Table:DPR 1 Maximum Temperature in Deg.Celsius, Table:DPR 2 Minimum Temperature in Deg.Celsius, Table:DPR 3 Relatively Humidity Table DPR 4 Ground Water Levels DPR 5 Demographic Pattern Table DPR 6 Literacy Rate Table DPR 7 Literacy Rate Table DPR 8 Land Use & Land Cover Table DPR 9 Proposed Integrated Watershed Management Projects Table M(SP)-2 Details of Previously Identified DPAP/DDP Table DPR 10 Vegetation & Land Use, Land Cover Vision & Strategy

5 6 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 11 11 12

12 13 13

4 CHAPTER –II GENERAL DESRIPTION OF THE MALOIBARI IWM PROJECT AREA

15-16

Location 15 Climate

Soil 15 15

Physiography, Relief & Drainage 16 5 CHAPTER-III PRESENT STATUS OF THE PROJECT AREA 17-28 Objectives 17 Present Land Use Table: DPR 11 19 Details of Areas of Micro Watersheds Table: M (SP) 2 19 Details of Types of Areas Covered under IWMP, Table (SP) 3 20 Details of Physiography & Relief Table: M (SP) 4 21 Agro-Climatic Zone, Soil types, Average Rainfall & Major

Crops., Table M (SP) 5 22

Details of Flood & Drought in Project Area., Table M (SP) 6 23 Details of Soil Erosion, Table M (SP) 7. 23 Details of Infrastructure, Table M (SP)8 24 Details of Land Holdings pattern, Table M (SP) 9 25 Details of Common Property Resources Table M (SP) 10 25

4

Details of Kharif Crop Area, Table M(PO) C1 26 Details of Rabi Crops Area, Table M (PO) C2 26 Details of Zaid Crop Area, Table M (PO) C3 27 Details of Fund Flow of Watershed Committee Account,

Table M(FM) 4 27

Details of Pending Ucs, Table M(FM) 5 28

6 CHAPTER-IV PROPOSED MANAGEMENT PLAN 29-57 Resource Potentials, Problems & Constraints 29 Strategy 32-37 Entry Point Activities (EPA) Table M(PA) A1 38 Other Activities of Preparatory Phase Table M (PA)-A2 39 Phasing of Livelihood Activities & Production System Table

DPR 12 40-41

Activities related to Surface water resources Table M (PA)B1 42-43 Activities related to recharging ground water Table M(PA)B2 44 Activities proposed for Users Groups Table M(PS)B3 45-46 Activities related to livelihood by Self Help Groups

Table M(PA)B4 47-50

Other activities of watershed work phase Table M (PA)B5 51 Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed works

Table M(PA)B6 52-53

Details of activities connected with vegetative cover Table M(PA)B7

54

Details of allied other activities Table M(PA)B8 55 Livelihood proposed to be created for Asset less people

Table M(PA) B9 56

Livelihood proposed to be created for farmers Table M(PA)B10

57

7 CHAPTER-V PLANNING 58-70 Proposed Entry Point Activities (EPA) Table M(PA)A1 58 Year wise phasing of project activities, Table DPR 12 59 Year wise Physical & Financial Target Table DPR 13 60-63 Year wise Physical & Financial Target Table DPR 14 64-67 Village wise GPS Points Table DPR 15 68-70 8 CHAPTER-VI INSTUTIONAL STRUCTURE 71 Details of Self Help groups (SHG) M(IS)9 71 Details of User Groups (UGs) in project area Table M(IS)10 71 9 CHAPTER-VII CAPACITY BUILDING 72 Capacity building activities for the year 2010-11,

Table M(CB)2 72

Information, Education & Communication (IEC) Table M9CB)3 Table M(CB)3

73

10 MAPS Location Map of Maloibari IWM Project. Present Land Use Map of Maloibari Watershed Area. Watershed map of Maloibari IWM project showing Micro Watersheds,

villages, drainage, relief etc.

Treatment Map of Maloibari IWMP PRA activity progress

5

6

INTRODUCTION

Soil-Water-Plant resources are nature’s gift to mankind. These three resources are the

most important and vital natural resources for the existence of man and animals. Soil,

water and plant are so interdependent that one cannot be managed efficiently without

the other two. But due to high rate of population growth-both human and livestock,

there is indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources for meeting the ever-

increasing demand for food, fodder, fuel, fibers and fertilizers. Thus developed,

continuous degradation of production base and imbalance in land-water-plant and

human-animal system, leads to ecological imbalance and economic insecurity. As a

result there is threat to the quality of our life and cultivation. Therefore it is highly felt

that the natural resources are to be managed efficiently, collectively and

simultaneously one has to look and find out the suitable under “unit of management”.

Of the three resources soil, water and vegetation or plants “soil and vegetation

subjected themselves to and easier manipulation where as water is the climatic

parameter that need to be disciplined once it comes in contact with vegetation and the

soil. However, water can be managed conveniently and efficiently only if watershed is

taken as an unit. Since soil, plant and water are interdependent resources, “watershed”

is considered to be the ideal unit for most effective and gainful management of these

resources.

Watershed is defined as an unit of an area which covers all land and water area that

contribute runoff to a common point. It is a complete dynamic unit, which invariably

response to any change that may be brought about within its extent. The soil and

water must therefore be considered planned and managed on watershed basics for

effective results.

Watershed approach has conventionally aimed at treating degraded land with the help

of low cost and locally accessed technologies such as in-situ soil and moisture

conservation measures, afforestation etc. through a participatory approach that seek to

secure close involvement of the user communities. The broad objectives were the

7

promotion of the overall economic development and improvement of socio-economic

conditions of the resources poor section of the people in-habiting the programme

areas. With this aim, the Govt. of India has launched the “Integrated Watershed

Management Programme (IWMP).

METHODOLOGY

The general the common guidelines for watershed development projects (2008) of the

Department of Land Resources (DoLR), Government of India were followed in

preparation of the Detailed Project Report (DPR).

The Methodology of planning envisages in the guidelines is the participatory planning

involving directly the villagers (Beneficiaries) of the project area with active co-

operation & participation of the Gram Panchayats (GP). The Participatory Rural

Appraisal (PRA) was carried out in all the villages in the projects area. Participatory

work sheet for assessment of needs and priorities including details of activities were

prepared. The socio-economic survey was conducted covering each and every house

hold. The data collected house wise and village wise were generated and analyzed.

The Comprehensive District Agricultural Plan (C-DAP) was also referred to and the

prescriptions suggested in C-DAP were adhered to in planning the work phase.

Basic information on watershed including rainfall, temperature, topography,

hydrogeology, soil forests etc. were collected from various published and unpublished

records, reports and thematic maps etc. of various Central and State Government

Organization including remote sensing data/maps of NRSO, toposheets, soil maps,

climatic maps, hydro-geological maps prepared and published by the National Bureau

of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning. Land use land cover maps were supplied by

the SLNA and the present land use land cover was analyzed and interpreted from

these maps with ground truth verification as well as data available with the revenue

authority.

8

The treatment measures were taken up for compiling and preparing the work phase in

the DPR as detailed in the common guidelines and as prescribed by the SLNA. The

cost analysis design and drawing etc. of different activities were also designed and

supplied by the SLNA and accordingly used in project planning.

The GPS points were taken for all village level proposed project sites and were

transferred in GIS layers.

The draft plan (both soft copy as well as hard copy) were prepared and placed for

review, modify and seek approval of the SLNA. On scrutiny of the draft plan by the

SLNA as well as by the concerned Project Manager Final Detailed Project Reports

have been prepared.

9

CHAPTER-I

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT

Location

The Kamrup Metro District is located between 910 45 East Longtitude, 600 10 45

with an average altitude of 54 metres msl. The district is bounded in the North by

Kamrup and Darrang District in the South by the State of Meghalaya in the East

Morigaon District and in the West by the Kamrup District.

Administrative Division:

The Kamrup (Metro) District comprises of four Development Block under its rural

jurisdictions. The District covers only one Civil Sub-Division with it’s headquartering

at Guwahati, the capital city of Assam. The Kamrup (Metro) represents only the 4

(four) Development Block areas namely Chandrapur, Dimoria and part of Bezera and

Rani but not the Guwahati Municipal areas.

Physical Setting

Geology

Kamrup (Metro) District lies in the northern fringe area of the Meghalaya Plateau.

The isolated hills in the midst of alluvial plain are also known as inselbergs

comprising of mostly precambric gneissic rocks. It is dominated by scattered hillocks

with intermittent plains, which are extended parts of Shillong Plateau that form the

southern boundary of the district.

Physiography:

Overall topography of the area varies from plain to undulating. The fringe area of the

Meghalaya is steep undulating converging to flat terrain towards the river

Brahmaputra. The terrain is dotted with small hills to residual hillocks. Chandrapur

Development block area of Kamrup (Metro) district is an undualating terrain with hills

and plains on the Southern Bank of River Brahmaputra. Dimoria Development Block

is mainly a plain area surrounded by hills in northern, the Chandrapur hills and

10

southern periphery with the hills of Meghalaya. The NH 37 runs through Rani

Development block area. Distinctive features under the Block areas are Deepar Beel,

Gauhati University and Airport.

Slopes

The terrain of the district ranges from gentle sloping to very step sloping. There are

flat land with a slope range as low as 0-1%, on the other hand with a steep slope of

more than 15% near the hills and hillocks. Low lying and Marshy lands are its

important land features. The relief map generated for Chandrapur Development Block

is furnished at Map No. 1.10.

Drainage Pattern

Drainage pattern is strongly controlled by geology. It varies from sub-dendritic to

parallel comprising of Digaru as its main sub basin of the Brahmaputra. The main

river system of the district is Digaru river system.

Soils

The main soil type of the district varies from sandy loam, loam, sandy clay and clay

loam. The overall organic and nitrogen contents are high. Phosphorus level is

medium with a low status of Potash content. The pH value of soils under Chandrapur

Development Block areas varies from 4.33 to 6.99. The plains contain comparatively

higher pH values than hills. Organic carbon content is high in almost all samples.

Similarly available N content is also high in most of the samples. Available P is high

in 5 samples, medium and low in 3 samples. However, available K is low in most of

the soils. The textures of the soils vary from sandy to clay through sandy loam, loam,

sandy clay, silty clay.

The pH value under Dimoria Development Block varies from 5.04 to 6.82. Organic

carbon content is high in as many as 16 samples. Available N is high in 14 samples.

Available P is high in 16 samples and low in 3 numbers, while available K status is

11

also found to be low in all samples. The texture of soils varies from Sandy to clayey

through Sandy loam, loam, and clay loam.

Similarly the soils of Rani Development Block reveal high pH values which varies

from 5.15 to 7.33. The organic carbon content of 12 sample is high. The available N

content of 7 samples are high, 5 samples are medium. The available P content is

medium, K content is dominated by low status. The soil textures vary from sandy to

clay with intermediate grades of sandy, loam, loam and sandy clay.

Climate

The average annual rainfall of the project area is about 1738 mm for the last ten years

as the following Metrological data collected from the Project area indicates and about

90% of it occurs between April and September with maximum occurrence during

June, July and August. The driest month of the year is January with an average rainfall

of 5.46mm during the last ten years. The highest temperature is recorded at 330 C in

the month of July and August and minimum temperature at 10.82 0 C in the month of

January. The climate is hot humid in summer. The maximum relative humidity of the

district is almost 90% and maximum of it occurs in the month of January. The details

of meteorological data are shown in the Table DPR-1, Table DPR-2, Table DPR-3 and

Table DPR-4. below:

Table DPR-1: Monthly Total Rainfall in Millimeters, Kamrup (Metro) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Average

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

1998 0.5 12.2 196.3 149.1 139 164.4 260.8 284.3 213 192.5 7.1 0 19430

1999 0 TR 13.2 25.8 361 295.9 348.5 384.6 189 129.8 44.3 0.9 21516

2000 4.6 22.8 45.3 220.2 367.1 365 201.2 373.2 159.5 33.2 1.7 0.6 21653

2001 2.1 16.4 19.4 267.2 293.1 343 240.3 177.4 205.4 185.7 15.4 0 21185

2002 13.9 4.5 85.8 276.3 214.7 396.2 295 182.3 113.6 31.7 54.5 0 20022

2003 6.2 37.7 120.2 249.3 166.5 550.8 333.9 231.1 158.1 182.8 21.4 12.6 24847

2004 10.7 8.4 10.9 547.5 126 205.1 399.6 65.2 89.8 354.4 3.7 0.6 21863

2005 16.6 3.9 150.7 134.2 284.5 104.6 175.1 803 82.1 117.2 1.4 0 22479

2006 0 11 18.7 180.5 290.3 153.9 247.2 162.7 88 119.9 15.9 6.7 15530

2007 0 96.1 29.8 286.6 96.2 294.2 286.8 122.8 315.5 118.7 32.2 0 20147

Source : Metrological Station, Borjhar – Guwahati

12

Table DPR-2 : Maximum Temperature in Deg. Celsius, Kamrup (Metro)

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1998 22.6 27 28.6 30.4 33 31.9 31.1 32.3 31.9 31.5 28.7 26.4

1999 25.4 29.8 32.2 33.8 31.1 32.9 31.5 31.8 32.2 0.4 28.6 26.1

2000 23.9 25 28 31.3 317 31.7 32.8 31.8 31.1 30.9 26.9 24.9

2001 23.5 26.8 31.2 30.7 31.5 32.7 33.1 33.3 32 30 28.1 24.8

2002 23.6 28.1 30.3 28.6 30.9 31.3 31.5 32.2 31.1 30.9 27.8 25

2003 21.7 25.8 27.6 29.6 31.6 31.7 32.4 33.3 32.3 29.9 27.6 24.4

2004 22.9 26.5 31.2 27.5 31.7 31.9 30.9 33.5 32 29.4 27.9 24.8

2005 23 27.3 29 30 30 33 32.6 32.6 33.5 29.5 28 25.8

2006 23.3 28.8 32.6 31.3 32.4 31.4 33.7 34.1 2.6 31.9 27.9 25.5

2007 24.4 25 30.7 30.8 33.7 32.9 32.6 34 32.6 31.9 29.8 26.4

Source : Metrological Station, Borjhar – Guwahati

Table DPR-3: Minimum Temperature in Deg. Celsius, Kamrup (Metro)

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1998 10.8 12.6 15.3 20.4 23.3 25.2 25.7 26.1 24.7 23.4 18.7 12.3

1999 10.5 13.9 15.6 22.6 23.5 25.7 26 25.9 25.2 23.2 18.5 12.39

2000 10.7 11.3 15.5 21.2 23.7 25.7 26 25.7 24.9 22.9 17.7 11.3

2001 10.8 13.5 15.3 20.3 23.3 25.4 26.4 26.2 25.4 22.9 18 12.6

2002 11.4 13.9 16.7 20.1 22.9 25.5 26.3 26 24.7 22 17.8 13.5

2003 10.2 13.2 16.1 20.8 22.8 25.1 26.3 26.6 25.8 23.3 18.1 13.7

2004 11.5 12.6 18.4 20.6 23.3 29.6 25.7 26.5 25.4 21.7 16.7 12.5

2005 11.3 14.4 17.8 20.6 22.5 25.9 26.3 26.3 25.7 22.7 17.9 12.7

2006 11.1 15.8 16.8 20.6 23.7 25.6 26.8 26.2 25.2 21.1 17.9 12.8

2007 9.9 13.4 16.1 20.7 24.4 25.7 26.2 26.5 25.4 23 18.2 12.9

Source : Metrological Station, Borjhar – Guwahati

13

Table DPR-4: Relative humidity at 0830 hrs. IST in percentage, Kamrup (Metro):

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

1998 89 76 69 78 80 87 85 86 85 84 86 86

1999 85 76 86 69 83 80 88 88 83 85 84 84

2000 87 76 70 76 81 87 84 85 85 80 88 85

2001 89 85 64 73 79 83 83 84 81 89 87 89

2002 89 77 71 78 80 86 87 86 82 81 84 87

2003 91 83 78 81 79 85 84 83 83 92 85 89

2004 94 79 70 84 78 83 86 82 84 82 82 86

2005 90 76 76 76 83 81 85 85 81 86 84 84

2006 92 84 63 75 77 84 81 79 81 81 86 89

2007 89 84 67 77 75 82 85 83 82 82 83 87

Source : Metrological Station, Borjhar-Guwahati.

Ground Water:

The overall terrain condition of the district can be divided into three board categories

i.e. low, medium high land & water logged. The average rainfall is 1700 mm with a

distinct winter. Therefore the district is experiencing both excess and scanty rainfall.

The Brahmaputra is flowing through the midst of the district. There is excess runoff

from Meghalaya. Brahmaputra being located in the midst of the district, the sub

surface runoff is high. Therefore the groundwater is also comparatively low. It

ranges from 6.30 meter depending upon the terrain conditions, reflecting very

fluctuating ground water level. During winter this should be replenished for better

productivity. Survey reveals that the iron content of ground water is high. The survey

data showing water levels in various locations are furnished in the Table DPR-5:

14

Table DPR-5: Ground Water Levels:

Sl. No. Village Average ground water level (m)

Average depletion (m)

1. Khetri 4 0.14

2. Kamarkuchi 5 0.17

3. Tetelia 3.5 0.12

4. Lachitgarh 4 0.14

5. Pachim Mayang 2.5 0.1

6. Amsing 3 0.1

7. Hahara 3 0.1

8. Nartap 2.5 0.1

9. Digaru 4 0.14

10. Dharapur 3 0.1

Average GWL 3.45 1.21

Demography Profile:

Population:

As per census 2001, the total population of the district is surveyed to be 2,23,445. Out

of which male comprises 1,21,424 and female comprises 1,02,021 thereby sex ration

stands at 1:1.12. The population density of the district is calculated at 33. Total

children of the district are 32497. The demographic pattern of the district is furnished

in Table No. DPR-6

Table No. DPR- 6. Demographic Pattern:

Sl. No. Category No

1 2 3

1. Total Population 2,23,445

2. Males 1,21,424

3. Females 1,02,021

4. Sex Ratio (Number of female per 1000 males) 840

5. SC 43,070

6. ST 96,260

7. Children (0.14 years) 32,497

15

Literacy Rate:

The literacy rate of the district is 76.86% with total population 2,23,445. Out of this

population the total number of males is 97,892 and females are 73,848. Accordingly

the male and female ratio stnds for 57% and 43% respectively, details of which is

appended in Table DPR-7.

Table No. DPR-7: Literacy Rate

Sl.

No.

Category No/ Percent

1 2 3

1. Population 2,23,445

2. Educated Persons 1,71,740

3. Males 97,892

4. Females 73,848

5. Literacy Rate 76.86%

Workforce and Economic Activities

Occupation and Work Force

Kamrup (Metro) district mainly consists of four developmental block jurisdiction.

Being located very near to Guwahati Municipal area these four blocks has experienced

both the influence of rural and city life. This influence has also affected the

professional lives of the people of these blocks. As results people are associated with

both government and private sector. Out of the total population 41,245 nos. belong to

public sector while 50,410 nos to business sector or what we call private sector which

includes both small and large scale industries, like carpentry, potteries, live-stocks,

fisheries, brick industries, etc. Along with this a major part of these four blocks is

dominated by hill and plain tribes which is suitable for different cultivation. As many

as 80,198 nos of total population select agriculture and allied activities as their main

source of livelihood. To have a clear picture of available work force of these blocks it

is important to figure out the numbers of unemployed population. The numbers of

16

total unemployed person are 19,095 among which 11,457 nos are educated

unemployed. Accordingly the total available work force of the district is also found

out and furnished in Table No. DPR-8.

Table No. DPR-8 Literacy Rate:

Sl. No. Category No/ Percent 1 2 3 1. Employed 41,245 2. Semi-employed 50,410 3. Unemployed 19,095 4. Occupational Distribution 80,18 5. Educated Unemployed 11,457

INFORMATION ON LAND USE AND LAND COVER IN KAMRUP (METRO). Table DPR-9: Land Use and land Cover, Kamrup (Metro), 2007-08: Sl. No. Category of land Area in

Ha Percentage.

1 2 3 4 1. Area under village built up 6702 30.48 2. Area under cultivation 2.1. With irrigation 2930 12.46 2.2. Without irrigation 8280 35.23 3. Wasteland 3.1. Natural wasteland 2498 10.62 3.2 Artificial wasteland 641 2.72 4. Area under Forest 4.1 Govt. Forest (Reserved) 1292 5.49 4.2. Private Forest 1158 3.00 Total Area: 23501 100

17

MIS table M (SP)-2 Proposed Integrated Management Project in the District:

Sl.

No.

Name of

District

Total Micro

Watershed in

the District

Micro Watershed covered so far Net Watershed

to be covered Department of

Land

Resources

Other

Ministries/

Department

Total

Watershed

Covered

No. Area

(Ha.)

No. Area

(Ha.)

No. Area

(Ha.)

No. Area

(Ha.)

No. Area

(Ha.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1. Kamrup 154 435009 110 59451 2 3000 112 62541 42 75704

Table-DPR-10: Details of previously identified DPAP/DDP areas proposed under IWMP during the financial

year 2009-10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sl.

No.

Name of

District

Name of

the

project

proposed

Name

of Block

Type of

Block

(DPAP

/DDP

/IWDP)

Area

of

Block

(ha)

No. of

pre-

IWMP

projects

sanctioned

in Block

Area of

sanctioned

projects

Net

area to

be

covered

Area of

the

proposed

projects

Area

proposed

to be

covered by

schemes

other than

DoLR

Net

balance

area

1 Kamrup Maloibari

IWMP

Dimoria No. 15626 Nil. Nil 15626 4619 Nil 11007

18

VEGETATION & LAND USE, LAND COVER

The important tree species grown in the district are Sal, (Shorea robusta) Teak (Tectona

Grandis), Gomari (Gamelina arborea), Sisoo (Dalbargia sisoo), Bamboo (Bambusa spp.),

Chap (Maicalia champaca), Koroi (Albizzia procera), Simul (Salmalia malbaricum)

Neem (Azadirachta indica) etc. Other species found in the area are Ficus, Ziziphus

Artocarpus etc. Tall grass species belonging to the genera Saccharum, Phramitus, Arundo

and Erinthus are also available. A large number of herbaceous plants found in cultivated

fields, roadsides and wasteland. Some of these plants are Lantana Camara, Empereta

cylindrical, Mimosa species, Eupatorium odoratum, Cynodon dactylon etc.

The principal crop of the district is paddy which is grown in almost three seasons with

varying degrees, followed by rape and mustered, potato, wheat, jute, black gram, lentil

etc. Almost all seasonal vegetable crops are grown in the district. In the homestead areas

bamboo is extensively grown along with arecanut, lemon, jackfruit, mangoes etc.

VISION AND STRETEGY

The Kamrup Metropolitan district is an area with specific ecological profile, which

should be taken into account when planning any intervention. Given the ecological

context the main issues are lacking in livelihood opportunities, education, health care,

land use, ground water depletion with low productivity. In the district the livelihood are

insecure. Agriculture is the main occupation does not provide security to support the

growing population. Alternative sources are also limited due to natural constrain like

flood, drought, and poor quality of land.

The approach for implementation of the programme is based on the sustainable

development of the region. This is again inherently link to the ability of the communities

to generate livelihood on a scientific way.

19

Under the circumstances critical issues relating to the development of agriculture and

allied sectors vis-à-vis in-situ conservation of soil & moisture, that need to be eddied are

as follows.

I. Increase productivity and income through in-situ conservation of soil & moisture,

up-gradation and utilization of natural endowments like land, water, plant, and human

resources in harmonious and integrated manner. This will aim at perpetual availability of

food, fodder, fuel, fiber, timber and biomass for rural and cottage industry to meet the

growing demands of human and livestock population through diversification and

intensification in existing farming system.

II. Introducing land use technologies, which improve production and productivity and

will enable the farmers to make use of land according to capability.

III. Farmers Organization: Formation, promotion and empowering of Users Groups,

Shelf Help Groups covering marginal and landless farmers providing facilities of

integrated development of the watershed with effective participation of the people of the

project area.

IV. Sustainability of production and farm income: The programmes are to be taken so

as to enable to retain the sustainability of production and as well as increase farm income.

The high rainfall and light soil condition need attention for efficient natural resources

management including judicious water management, rain water harvesting proper

drainage line treatment, rejuvenation of degraded vegetative cover to tackle the problems

of soil erosion, soil acidity, lose of vegetative cover and bio-diversity.

V. Generation of employment by optimum development of natural and human resources

of villages through creating general awareness on scientific farming and market

information as well as human resources through adequate time-to-time training.

20

CHAPTER-II

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE MALOIBARI IWM PROJECT AREA

LOCATION

The Maloibari watershed falls under Dimoria Development Block of Kamrup (Metro)

district. The proposed Maloibari IWMP area is located in the eastern side of the district

bordering Marigaon district in east and the river Kolong on it’s north. It lies between 920

01/ E to 92008/ E latitude and 2607/ N to 26012/ N. longitude.

CLIMATE

The average annual rainfall of the project area is about 1738 mm for the last ten years as

the following Metrological data collected from the Project area indicates and about 90%

of it occurs between April and September with maximum occurrence during June, July

and August. The driest month of the year is January with an average rainfall of 5.46mm

during the last ten years. The highest temperature is recorded at 330 C in the month of

July and August and minimum temperature at 11 0 C in the month of January. The

climate is hot humid in summer. The maximum relative humidity of the district is almost

90% and maximum of it occurs in the month of January.

SOIL

The soils are Younger Alluvium, predominantly very deep excessively drain, Fine Soils

occurring on moderately slopping to moderately steep slopping side slop of residuals fills

having Clayey surface with moderate erosion (Clayey, Typic Kandi Humults) associated

with deep somewhat excessively drain, Fine Loamy soils moderately steep slopping side

slope of residual hills with savior erosion and slight stoniness (Fine Loamy, Typic

Dystrochrepts).

21

The overall Organic and Nitrogen contents are high. Phosphorus level is medium with a

low status of Potash contents. Soils are slightly acidic in reaction. The pH value rages

from 5.04 to 6.82.

PHSIOGRAPHY RELIEF & DRAINAGE The overall topography of the area varies from plain to undulating. The project area is

mainly plain area surrounded by hills in northern side. The project area is having some

low-lying and marshy areas. The areas near to river Brahmaputra are low lying and

marshy land, which become flood affected during rainy season. The elevation ranges

from 120 to 260 m. The general slope in the plain area is less than 10 m per km with

some inselbergs with steep slope. The ground water potential is very high and is suitable

for dug well and shallow tube well. The drainage patturn in the project area is sub-

dendritic. The river Kolong passes through the northern boundary of the project area. The

rivulet Isila passes through the project area and meets the river Kolong at Bogibari pathar

village.

22

CHAPTER-III PRESENT STATUS OF THE PROJECT AREA

Objectives:

The specific objectives of the project are as follows:

i. Conservation up-gradation and utilization of natural endowments like land, water plant,

animal and human resources in harmonious and integrated manner. This will aim at

perpetual availability of food, fodder, fuel, fiber, timber and biomass for rural and cottage

industries to meet the growing demands of human and livestock population through

diversification use pattern.

ii. Introducing land use technologies, which improve production and productivity of

crops in the project areas.

iii. Introducing measures, which will enable the farmers to make use of land according to

its capability.

iv. Generation of employment during project period and regular employment after

completion of the project.

v. Securing stability and growth of agricultural production.

vi. Optimization of available resources such as soil, water and land within the micro

watershed.

vii. Creating a general awareness among the local farmers about adopting scientific

farming.

viii. Providing facilities of integrated development and production of the watershed with

effective participation of the people of the project area.

23

ix. In addition to food, fodder and fuel, the project will endeavor to enhance cash flow to

the farmers and landless agricultural labourer through increase casual employment,

marketing of marketable surplus of various produce with the help of forming various self

help groups (SHG).

x. Generation of employment by optimum development of natural and human resources

of villages in order to promote income generation activities and to encourage savings.

24

Table DPR 11: Land use pattern of Maloibari IWM Project

The present land use pattern of the project area as interpreted from the remote sensing map supplied by the SLNA and as

per ground habitation is as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl.

No.

Name of

watershed

Geographical

area

Built

up

area

Forest

area

Land

under

agriculture

use

Rain

Fed

area

Permanent

Pasture

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

cultivable

1. Maloibari 6593 370 1757 3787 3030 99 399 81

Table-M(SP)2: details of areas of micro watersheds covered under the watershed

programme. Sl.

No.

Name of

District

Total Micro

Watershed in

the District

Micro Watershed covered so far Net Watershed

to be covered Department of

Land

Resources

Other

Ministries/

Department

Total

Watershed

Covered

No. Area

(Ha.)

No. Area

(Ha.)

No. Area

(Ha.)

No. Area

(Ha.)

No. Area

(Ha.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1. Kamrup 154 435009 110 59451 2 3000 112 62541 42 75704

25

Table-M (SP) 3: Details of the types of areas covered under the IWMP.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Sl. No.

Name of

State

Name of District

Names of projects

Year of sanction

Project duration (dd/mm/ yyyy) Treatable

area of the

project

Type of terrain Hilly (H)/ Desert (D)/ Others (O)

Project cost (Rs. In lakh)

Names of micro watersheds and Code Nos.# (as

per DoLR’s unique

codification)

1 Assam Kamrup Maloibari 2009 2009 2014 4619 ha. Others 554.28 3B2A2

(Contd…)

11 12

Cultivated and wasteland area of the projects Area details (ha) (Falling within the projects)

Cultivated Rain fed

area

Cultivated irrigated

area

Uncultivated wasteland

Pvt. Agri. Land Forest Land

Community Land

Others (River &

river sand etc.)

Total geographical

area (ha) a)

Temporary Fallow

b) Permanent

3787 Nil 399 81 Gen. SC ST OBC Total 1757 579 305 6593 1150 946 842 849 3787

26

Table-M(SP)4: Details of physiography and relief of the project areas: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl. No.

Name of State

Name of District

Names of

project

Elevation (meters)

Slope range (%)

Order of Watershed

Sub/micro-watershed

Major streams

Top sequence (Soil series)

1. Assam Kamrup Maloibari 120 - 260 m. 0 – 5 %

1. Tetelia (3B2A2 i) 2. Hahara (3B2A2 ii)

3. Maloibari 3B2A2 iii)

1. Kolong 2. Isila

The soils are Younger Alluvium,

predominantly very deep excessively

drain, Fine Soils occurring on moderately

slopping to moderately steep slopping side

slop of residuals fills having Clayey

surface with moderate erosion (Clayey,

Typic Kandi Humults) associated with

deep somewhat excessively drain, Fine

Loamy soils moderately steep slopping

side slope of residual hills with savior

erosion and slight stoniness (Fine Loamy, Typic Dystrochrepts).

27

Table-M (SP) 5: Agro-climatic zone, soil types, average rainfall and major crops in the project area: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl. No.

Name of State

Name of the Agro-climatic

zone

Area in ha

Names of the

District

Names of the

projects

Major soil types Average rainfall in mm (preceding 5

years’ average)

Major crops

a) Type b)

Area (ha)

a) Name b) Area (ha)

1. Assam Central

Brahamaputra valley

6593 Kamrup Maloibari

Clayey, Typic Kandi

Humults

4615

2000 Paddy, 3787 Fine Loamy,

Typic

Dystrochrepts).

1978

Table-M (SP) 6: Details of flood and drought in the project area.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sl. No.

Names of States

Names of Districts

Names of projects Particulars Villages

Periodicity Not

affected Annual Any other (please specify)

1. Assam Kamrup Maloibari

Flood

No. of villages: 06 Nos.

June to

August

Since the area is on the bank of Brahmaputra and mostly char raeas village namely Dhubapara, Lupsar, Bhatipara, Dakital, Mornoi, Morakucha Bhujmola and Gajiajani are inundated from the flood of Brahmaputra river.

Partly affected 8 Nos.

Drought

No. of villages: 5 Nos.

December to

March

In an interval of 10 to 12 years drought like situation occurs in the entire State when Monsoon starts late.

Nil.

28

Table-M (SP) 7: Details of soil erosion in the project areas:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl. No.

Name of State

Name of District

Name of project Cause Type of

erosion

Area affected

(ha)

Run off (mm/ year)

Average soil loss (Tones/ ha/ year)

1. Assam Kamrup Maloibari

Water erosion a. Sheet 2703 176.18 41.48 b. Rill 527 117.88 c. Gully 1780 137.78

Sub-Total: 5010 Wind erosion - Nil -

Total for project: 5010 (Source: Soil Conservation Deptt. Assam – Data as reflected in PPR)

29

Table-M SP) 8: Details of infrastructure in the project area:

1 2 3 4 5 6 Sl. No.

Name of State

Name of District

Name of project Parameters Status

1. Assam Kamrup Maloibari

(i) No. of villages connected to the main road by an all-weather road

21

(ii) No. of villages provided with electricity 21 (iii) No. of households without access to drinking water Nil (iv) No. of educational institutions :

Primary (P)/ Secondary (S)/ Higher Secondary (HS)/ vocational institution (VI)

(P) 13

(S) 3

(HS) 1

(VI) 0

(v) No. of villages with access to Primary Health Center

21 Nos.

(vi) No. of villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary

21 Nos.

(vii) No. of villages with access to Post Office 4 Nos. of Sub Post offices (viii) No. of villages with access to Banks 21 Nos. (ix) No. of villages with access to Markets / mandis 21 Nos. (x) No. of villages with access to Agro-industries Nil (xi) Total quantity of surplus milk Nil. (xii) No. of milk collection centers

(e.g. Union(U)/ Society(S)/ Pvt. agency(PA)/ others (O))

(U) Nil.

(S) Nil.

(PA) 6

(O) Nil.

(xiii) No. of villages with access to Anganwadi Center 21 Nos. (xiv) Any other facilities with no. of villages

(Please specify) 1 No. B. Ed. Training Center

at Khetri

30

Table-M (SP) 9: Details of land holding pattern in the project area.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sl. No.

Name of State

Name of District

Names of the project

Type of Farmer No. of households

No. of BPL

households

Land holding (ha)

Irrigated Rainfed Total

1 Assam Kamrup Maloibari

(i) Large farmer 0 0 Nil 0 0 (ii) Small farmer 1026 0 Nil 1352 1352 (iii) Marginal farmer 1950 0 Nil 1535 1535 (iv) Landless person 1468 1468 Nil 900 900

Total: 4444 1468. Nil 3787 3787

Table-M (SP) 10: Details of Common property resources of the project area.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sl. No.

Name of

State

Name of

District

Name of

Project

CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha) Area owned / In possession of

Pvt. persons

Govt. PRI Any other (Pl. Specify)

Pvt. persons

Govt. PRI Any other (Pl. Specify)

(Specify deptt.)

1. Assam Goalpara Mornoi

(i) Wasteland / degraded land 299 341 Nil Nil 380 Nil Nil Nil (ii) Pastures Nil. Nil. Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (iii) Orchards 608 Nil Nil Nil 608 Nil Nil Nil (iv) Village Woodlot Nil Nil. Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (v) Forest Nil 1757 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (vi) Village Ponds / Tanks 27 Nil. Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

(vii) Community Buildings 12 48 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (viii) Weekly Markets Nil. 5 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (ix) Permanent markets Nil. 3 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (x) Temples / Places of worship 9 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

(xi) Others (Pl. specify) Nil. Nil. Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

31

Table-M (PO) C1: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project area.

1 2 3 4 5 6 Sl. No.

Name of State

Name of the District

Name of Project Name of crops

Pre - project Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per

ha. Total Production (Qtl)

Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf.

1. Assam Kamrup Maloibari Paddy - 826 - 20 - 1652 Pulses - 25 - 7 - 175

Total for the project area: - 851 - - - 1827

Table-M(PO)C2: Details of Rabi crop area and yield in the project area.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sl. No.

Name of

State

Name of the

District

Name of Project

Name of crop

Pre-project Mid-term Post-project

Area (ha)

Average Yield

(Qtl) per ha.

Total Production

(Qtl)

Area (ha)

Average Yield per ha

(qtl)

Total production (qtl)

Area (ha)

Average Yield per ha

(qtl)

Total production

(qtl)

Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf.

1. Assam Kamrup Maloibari Lentil - 8 - 22 - 178 10 15 30 25 300 625 15 20 30 25 450 500 Vegetables - 50 - 30 - 1500 30 50 50 45 1500 2250 50 80 60 50 3000 4000

Total for the Project: - 58 - 1678 40 65 - - 1800 2875 65 100 - - 3450 4500

* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total no. of Districts; from column no.4 total no. of projects; from column no.5, total no. of crops; from column no.6 to 8, the totals for the area, average yield per ha and total production, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the Table.

Irri. – Irrigated Rf. – Rainfed

32

Table-M(PO)C3: Details of Zaid crop area and yield in the project area.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sl. No.

Name of

State

Name of the

District

Name of

Project

Name of crops

Pre-project Mid-term Post-project

Area (ha)

Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.

Total Production

(Qtl)

Area (ha)

Average Yield per ha

(qtl)

Total production

(qtl)

Area (ha)

Average Yield per ha

(qtl)

Total production

(qtl) Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf. Irri Rf.

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Winter rice - 650 - 22 - 14300 100 700 25 20 2500 14000 150 1000 27 22 4050 22000

Banana - 7 - 5 - 35 - 30 - 6 - 1800 - 50 - 7 - 350

Pine apple - 2 - 350 - 700 - 10 500 - 50000 - 50 - 700 - 35000 Assam Lemon

- - - - - - 10 - 300 - 3000 - 20 - 350 - 7000

Total for the project: - 659 377 15035 100 750 25 826 2500 68800 150 1120 27 1079 4050 64350

* From column no. 2, total number of States, from column no. 3, total no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of projects; from column no.5, total no. of crops; from column no. 6 to 8, the totals for the area, average yield per ha and total production, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the Table. Irri. – Irrigated Rf. – Rainfed Table-M(FM)4: Details of Fund flow of Watershed Committee Accounts in the Country: State-wise* (Amount in Rs.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Sl. No.

Name Of

State

Name of District

Name of Project

Name of watershed committee

Opening Balance

Deposit Withdrawal Interest accrued

Closing balance

DRDA/ ZP cheque No./date

Amount / Date of deposit in WC Account

Total amount available in WC Account

Amount withdrawn by Cash/ Cheque

Date of with-drawal

Purpose of withdrawal

1 Assam Kamrup Maloibari 1. Hahara 2. Tetelia

3. Maloibari To be maintained with the progress of execution.

* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total number of Districts; from column no.4 total number of projects; from column no.5 total no. of watershed committees; from column no. 6 total amount of opening balance; from column no.7, total amount deposited in WC accounts and total amount available in WC accounts; from column no.8 total amount withdrawn, category-wise; from column no.9 total interest accrued and from column no.10 total closing balance for WCs, for the entire country may be mentioned at the end of the table.

33

Table-M(FM)5: Details of pending UCs.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sl. N

o.

Stat

e

Dis

tric

t

Proj

ect

Instal-ment no.

Financial year of

release of fund

Amount released (Rs. in lakh)

Amount

utilized (Rs.in lakhs)

Submission of UC@ Date of Submission

of UC

Reasons for not

submitting/ delayed

submission of UC

Pending UCs

Due date Amount (Rs. In lakhs)

Date Amount (Rs.

In lakhs)

Period Amount

(Rs. in lakhs)

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Kamrup-I 5th 2008-09 272.00 272.00 1/4/09 272.00 1/6/09 272.00 Nil Nil Nil Kamrup-II 3rd 2007-08 213.00 169.32 1/5/09 169.32 1/7/09 169.32 Nil Nil Nil Kamrup-III 4th 2007-08 133.00 132.26 1/3/08 1333.56 1/8/08 1333.5

6 Nil Nil Nil

Kamrup-IV 5th 2008-09 381.64 336.91 1/4/09 336.91 1/7/09 336.91 Nil Nil Nil Kamrup-V 4th 2007-08 172.49 172.15 1/4/08 172.49 1/3/09 172.49 Nil Nil Nil Kamrup-VI 4th 2007-08 362.41 362.41 1/4/08 362.41 1/3/09 362.41 Nil Nil Nil Kamrup-VII

1st 2007-08 68.77 64.93 1/3/07 60.77 1/3/08 60.77 Nil Nil Nil

Kamrup-VIII

1st 2006-07 157.12 88.93 1/3/07 88.93 1/3/08 88.93 Nil Nil Nil

Kamrup-IX 1st 2006-07 56.63 55.21 1/3/07 55.21 1/309 55.21 Nil Nil Nil Total: 1817.06 1654.12 2851.6 2851.6

34

CHAPTER -IV

PROPOSED MANAGEMENT PLAN

RESOURCE POTENTIALS, PROBLEMS AND CONSTRAINTS

Resource Potentials

The favourable climate and altitude, the high rainfall and humidity and the ecology make

the area a distinct and unique. The favourable climate for growth, the soil types, the water

resources, the diversity of crops etc. make the area endowed with rich potentials.

Crop diversity- The project area has good potentialities for growing a wide diversity of

crops because of favourable climate, rainfall and other factors. Food crops such as

cereals, pulses and oilseeds are grown in the project area although rice is by far the most

important crop. Other cereals grown in the area are maize, wheat, millet etc. the pulses

grown include black gram, green gram, lathyrus (khesari), peas, pegion pea (arahar) and

lentil. Among the oilseeds are mustard, sesame and ground nut. Cash crops include jute,

mesta cotton, potatoes and sugarcane. Horticultural crops include pineapple, banana,

orange and other citrus fruits, guava coconut, mango, jackfruit, litchi, plums, papaya etc.

The spice crops such as zinger, turmeric and tuber crops like tapioca, sweet potato etc.

are grown. Plantation crops like tea, rubber, black pepper, betel nut and betelvine, etc. are

common in the project area. All common vegetable are also grown in the project area.

Medicinal and aromatic crops as well as timber trees, bamboo and cane are also grown.

Grasses are more important in flush seasons, but tree leaves, shrubs and weeds have an

important role to play in feeding domestic livestocks during lean season.

Genetic diversity- The entire North Eastern Region of India is considered to be the home

of origin of many crops such as rice, cucumber, brinjal, phaseolus beans, amaranth,

mandarin orange and other citrus fruits including assam lemon, jambara etc. The wide

variability in the germplasm of the region is a major sources for improving productivity

35

of crops, enhancing quality and for imparting resistance to pests, diseases as well as

various other stress conditions. Agro industrial potentialities are rather vast in the entire

region. However, these potentialities for agro based industries have not been utilized fully

mainly because of infrastructural deficiencies, lack of awareness and other socio

economic bottlenecks.

Water resources- There is abundant resources of water in the area because of heavy

rainfall. There are also large numbers of tributaries emanating from the hills and flowing

through the project area in to the river Brahmaputra. With proper planning, harvesting

and management water resources potentials can be effectively utilized for production

purposes. Rain water from the major sources as well as natural lakes, ponds, springs;

beels, marshy lands and ground water etc. form other sources of water. The ground water

potentials of the area is also high.

Institutional base- Institutions concerned with development, education, research and

training in agriculture and allied sectors are vitally linked with improvement of

agriculture. The development departments of the Govt. of Assam like Department of

Agriculture, Soil Conservation, Animal Husbandry, Fishery, Sericulture, and Forestry are

proposed to facilitate coordinating in proper implementation of the management plan.

Technological and capacity building supports are proposed from the National Institute of

Rural Development (NIRD) (NER), Assam Remote Sensing Application Centre

(ARSAC), Assam Agriculture University (AAU) including Veterinary and Fishery

Colleges and Krishi Vikash Kendras (KVK) as well as other Research Centers including

ICAR research Complex at Borapani, Meghalaya etc.

36

CONSTRAINTS AND PROBLEMS:

Despite having so much of potentialities agriculture in the region has remained under

developed. It is primarily because there are also a number of constraints and problems

which are responsible for the present state of agricultural production. These constraints

can be grouped under five broad heads. These are (1) Climatic Constraints, (2)

Infrastructural Constraints, (3) Bio-physical Constraints, (4) Constraints of Management

and (5) Socio-economic Constraints.

Constraints of Climate include heavy rainfall with high intensity and periodic distribution

and humidity, low temperature during winter, low light intensity and radiation, recurrent

floods as well as drought conditions. The high rainfall and the humidity not only create

favourable environment for the prevalence of wide range of pests, diseases and weeds,

the rainfall also create problems not only of floods but also in drying, storage and hay

making etc. It needs to be mentioned however that there are also positive aspects of high

rainfall and humidity resulting in adequacy of water as well as favourable climate for

growth of crops.

Infrastructural Constraints include geographic isolation, lack of road, transport and

communication facilities, inadequacy of irrigated areas and lack of post harvest facilities

and marketing etc. Transport and communication system is absolutely poor in the entire

North Eastern Region. Similarly, the cost of transport to and fro out side the region is also

very costly and time consuming. Such a situation hampers not only in transfer of

technology, supply of input in time but also leads to higher cot in transportation; and thus

creating disadvantage in competitive market outside. The scope for increased production

utilizing modern technology, modern tools and higher rate of fertilizers is limited due to

lack of assured irrigation. Similarly, facilities for post harvest operations such as drying,

threshing, storage and processing have practically not been developed.

37

The acidic soil, in accessible areas, the varied undulating topography, soil erosion and

degradation, ecological imbalance, recurring floods, abundance of weeds, insects, pests,

and diseases and low level technology are some of the important bio-physical constraints

limiting agricultural production.

There are also a large number of problems connected with management of agricultural

production. Some important ones are the gap in extension, poor motivation and

awareness, inadequacy of training, lack of incentive for the farmers including non

assurance of support price; non availability of improved inputs in time, lack of credit

facilities and market, dearth of qualified manpower in many cases, weak linkage between

research and development and above all in effective coordination of all concerned.

STRATEGY-

The new approach envisages a broader vision of hydrological units (watershed)

comprising of clusters of micro watersheds. There would be a multi tier ridge to valley-

sequenced approach, which is proposed to be adopted towards implementation of

Watershed Development Project.

Keeping in mind the guiding principles of watershed management the major thrust will

be to immediately increase the vegetative cover in the project area and to restore the

degraded ecosystem, which is at critical stage. It is also equally stressed to conserve

rainwater through increasing time of concentration by way of decreasing the velocity of

runoff water, encouraging ground water recharge through surface water storage,

harvesting and distribution of rainwater arriving to provide alternative and self sustaining

occupation to the people with enhanced livelihood opportunities and improvements in

productivity and income.

38

An Integrated Watershed Management Project with due emphasis on protective

afforestation pasture development, scientific agriculture through various soil conservation

measures, harvesting of rainwater and runoff water, distribution of water to agriculture

field, horticulture, pisiculture, sericulture, piggery development, poultry development,

dairy development etc.

Emphasis should also be given adequately at imparting training and environmental

motivation programme to all users group and shelf help groups as such it is proposed to

make the people conscious and develop skill specially among womenfolk who are

traditionally an important constituent of the society particularly in respect of economic

activity and thereby improving access of the poor, specially women to the benefits and

ensuring access to usufructs right from common property resources for the resource poor.

The schemes proposed in the project area are basically on the basis on the participatory

rural appraisal (PRA) exercises conducted in the project area. The needs of the villagers

are taken into consideration and based on the availability of fund and magnitude of the

requirement of the villagers the schemes have been proposed.

O. Entry Point Activities: With a view to establish credibility of the project

implementing agency as well as watershed development team and to create a rapport with

the village community some important entry point activities have been proposed as

envisaged in the guidelines of the Govt. of India. The schemes/projects are selected and

proposed by the PIA/Project Manager in consultation with the beneficiaries, the gram

panchayats, the watershed committee as well as the watershed development team.

39

A. Agricultural Strategy proposed:

Production of rice will have to be raised through improving productivity of winter and

summer rice through use of quality seeds, high yielding varieties, hybrid inputs and

irrigation potential. Area under rice with very poor productivity should be diverted to

summer rice with creation of irrigation potential.

The district is in an advantageous position as it is located near the State capital. However

there is need to bridge the gap between research and extension for which the Watershed

Committee, Project Implementing Agency, The District Agricultural Machinery as well

as District Watershed Development Unit should Co-ordinate; not only to increase

agricultural production but also on agri processing, input availability, and marketing as

well as overall transfer of technology from lab to land for which crop demonstration

programmes are also incorporated.

More over it is proposed that one no. of Central Nursery with different suitable

horticultural species be raised under entry point activities so as to enable to distribute

seedlings to the people to supplement in their home stead garden and orchards.

B. Protective Afforestation:

Forest are important natural resources and they influence climate, soil conditions

particularly soil and water balance, erosion, floods, maintenance of bio-sphere, ecology

as well as wild flora and fauna etc. In this project it is proposed to create additional forest

coverage of 45 ha in suitable species. In areas with sandy soils in reverine environment

Khair Sisso and Simul etc. should be planted while in other areas plantation of bamboo to

be stressed as it is not only poor man’s timber but are also needed for paper industries.

40

Moreover, it is proposed that one no. of central horty- forestry nursery with around 50000

nos. planting stock be raised with important forest/ horticultural species suitable for the

locality under entry point activity so that seedlings can be given to the people within the

project area as well as planting can be undertaken in road sides river bank and

institutional campus.

C. Cash Crop development: The area is very much suitable for rubber plantation which

is also economically viable and profitable. Besides producing rubber sheets from the

latex, on maturity the timber can be utilized for furniture and other purposes. Under the

circumstances considering the suitability of sites and availability of land it is proposed to

create and area of 108 ha. of rubber plantation in the project area.

D. Development of Pasture and Animal Husbandry:

The project area has good potential for development of animal husbandry, which needs

special attention. The rural people rear livestock and poultry as important source of

income.

Grass like Gunea, Napier, Para and other locally available grass species may be considered for

raising in the proposed area. It is proposed that 2 hectares of area with podder grass to be raised

in the project area under entry point activity and output to be sold to or may be distributed to the

beneficiaries as the watershed committee /District Watershed Development Unit feel proper.

As many as 233 units of Self Help Groups (SHGs) are selected in the project area to take

up schemes of rearing of milch cow, poultry, piggery and duckery, beekeeping and other

micro enterprises etc.

E. Pisciculture:-

Pisciculture is one of the important developmental schemes, which helps in improving

life style of the people. In one hand creation of water bodies helps in recharging of

41

ground water level and improves in soil moisture regime. On the other hand pisciculture

in water bodies like Farm Pond, fisheries etc. gives additional income to the farmers. In

general this would meet the nutrient requirement of the people in the project area and

others.

F. Soil and Water Conservation Activities:

In situ-conservation, utilization of soil and water within the Project is the prime criteria

for sustaining agricultural and horticultural production in the cultivated land for which

proper soil and water conservation activities are to be taken on priority basis. Therefore

considering the necessity for comprehensive in situ soil and water conservation measures

in the project area the following soil conservation engineering measures are

recommended as detailed in the work plan.

Water harvesting structures - To store run off water and to check gully erosion as well as

sheet and rill erosion construction of 4 nos. R.C.C. check dams or drop spill ways, farm

ponds, earthen embankments etc. are proposed in the project area which will give benefit

to arrest soil loss, improve soil moisture regime and increase production of crops of

kharif as well as rabi crops in the project area 6 nos. of water distribution canal are

proposed to be constructed in the project area. Further by using water pumps kharif crops

can also be cultivated in nearby areas.

G. Land Development:-

To protect the land from erosion as well as to arrest the run off water in the project area

10 nos, (involving 13638 Rm.) of earthen bunds with/ without core wall are proposed to

be constructed in the project area to give benefit in 780 hectares of cultivated field.

These earthen bunds will also protect the paddy fields from inundation by the floodwater

of the adjoining Kalang river and to give strength to the dykes boulder pitching is also

proposed in areas where it is felt needed.

42

Surface Water Storage / Ground Water Recharge: To create facility for storage of run off

water and to facilitate rearing of fish construction of RCC check dams, farm ponds,

fishery ponds as well as reclamation of marshy lands are also proposed in the project

area. The water from the farms dug out ponds and ring wells in agricultural fields and

homestead garden will recharge the ground water level about 3 mts. And can be utilize by

in paddy fields, orchards including vegetables gardens can be utilized by using water

pumps.

Moreove11 nos. of Deep tube well is also proposed in the project area to recharge ground

water level as well as for meeting up requirement of drinking water of the people of the

project area.

For effective implementation of the project activities in the project area all concerned

must share the overall responsibilities from the District Water Shed Development Unit

(DWDU) level to the Users Groups (UG) and Self Help Group (SHG) Level. For proper

and fruitful implementation of the Project the responsibility of the Project Implementing

Agency and that of the Watershed committee is maximum. The watershed Development

Team must co-ordinate with the watershed committee and Project Implementing Agency

for effective implantation of the water shed works. Proper Training to the Users Groups

(UG) and Self Help Groups (SHG) is most required for effective implementation of the

project activities.

43

Chapter IV: Project Activities Name of district:- Kamrup Name of watershed:- Maloibari Name of Micro watershed:- Maloibari, Hahara & Tetelia

Total Project Area:-6593 ha Treatable Area:-4619 ha Project Cost:-554.28 Lakh

Financial Outlay; Rs. 22.17 lakhs (Financial figures in lakh Rs.) Table-M(PA)A1: Entry point activities (EPA).

Sl n

o

Stat

e

Dis

tric

t

Nam

e of

the

proj

ect

Entry point activities Estimated cost

Expenditure incurred

Expected outcome Actual outcome

Rem

arks

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Nature conservation and environmental preservation scheme at Teteliguri Gaon

0.85 Aesthetic and for environmental purpose

Wor

ks &

estd

. Cos

t as

pro

pose

d by

PIA

/ Pr

ojec

t M

anag

er

Community pond development at Mitoni NC Vill. 0.78 Public utility Roadside plantation from Golap village to Maloibari chowk (2 km)

3.90 Aesthetic and for environmental purpose

Installation of 8 nos. Ring well under Maloibari IWMP area

4.00 For drinking purpose

Supply of desk bench at Helagog High school 2.00 For students Community pond development at Rewa village 2.00 Construction of latrine cum Urinal at Maloibari Balika Bidyapith H.S. School

2.00 For use of Students & Teachers

Plantation at Tetelia Market place 1.53 Community development Horty-forestry plantation at Helagog village

2.11 Seedling to be distributed

Construction of foot bridge at Salona village 3.00 Public utility Total : 22.17

44

Table-M(PA)A2: Other activities of preparatory phase.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Sl. No. State District Name of

project

Initiation of village

level institution

Capacity building

IEC activities

Baseline survey

Hydro-geological

survey

Identifying technical support agencies

Resource agreements

Preparation of DPR

Evaluation of Project

1 Assam Kamrup Maloibari

1.1790 21.442 5.2533 Completed Completed NIRD (NER)

ARSAC, AAU

Under process

Completed Not started

* from column no. 2, no. of States; from column no. 3, no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of Projects; from column no. 5 to 14 category wise totals, from column no. 15, total cost incurred, for the entire country may be indicated at the end of the table # One of the following may be entered in columns 5 to 14 , Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started

45

Table DPR 12: Phasing of Livelihood Activities and Production System Name of District: Kamrup Name of Project: Maloibari.

Treatable Area: 6593 ha Financial Target: 181.93 Lakh

Name of Scheme Physical Target

Unit cost

Year wise Phasing 2nd year (4%) 3rd year (3%) 4th year (3%) Total

A. Livelihood Activities (Asset less) Nos Amonut Nos Amonut Nos Amonut I. Livestock Development Works by S.H.G. (1 unit to each

SHG Group)

A. Piggery – Breaded 12 nos 1.20 5 nos 6.00 4 nos 4.80 3 nos 3.60 14.40 B. Duck Rearing 12 nos 0.12 5 nos 0.60 3 nos 0.36 4 nos 0.48 1.44 C. Milch Cow 9 nos 1.20 3 nos 3.60 3 nos 3.60 3 nos 3.60 10.80 II. Other Activities 0.00 A. Bicycle Repairing 8 nos 0.40 4 nos 1.60 2 nos 0.80 2 nos 0.80 3.20 B. Handloom 11 nos 0.50 4 nos 2.00 4 nos 2.00 3 nos 1.50 5.50 C.Pottary Making 2 nos 0.44 nil 1 nos 0.44 1 nos 0.44 0.88 D. Fruit Processing 4 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1 nos 0.50 1 nos 0.50 2.00 E. Carpenter 6 nos 0.24 2 nos 0.48 2 nos 0.48 2 nos 0.48 1.44 F. Mobile Repairing 2 nos 0.30 2 nos 0.60 nil nil nil 0.60 G. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 nil nil 2 nos 1.00 nil nil 1.00 I. Vermi Compost 5 nos 0.225 2 nos 0.45 2 nos 0.45 1no. 0.225 1.13 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25

x 30) m2 9 nos 0.60 4 nos 2.40 1 no. 0.60 4 nos 2.40 5.40

K. Bamboo Craft 3 nos 0.55 1 no 0.55 2 nos 1.10 1.65 L. Wood Craft 2 nos 0.55 nil nil nil nil 2 nos 1.10 1.10 M. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.40 2 nos 0.80 nil nil nil nil 0.80 N. Jaru Making 3 nos 0.30 3 nos 0.90 nil nil nil nil 0.90 O. Tarja Making 4 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 2 nos 1.00 2.00 P. Bee-Keeping 6 nos 0.20 1 no 0.20 3 nos 0.60 2 nos 0.40 1.20 Total: 102 nos 22.18 16.63 16.63 55.44 Contd………..

46

B. Production System & Micro Enterprises 5% 4% 4% A. Piggery – Breaded 11 nos 1.20 4 nos 4.80 3 nos 3.60 4 nos 4.80 13.20 B. Duck Rearing 13 nos 0.12 3 nos 0.36 6 nos 0.72 4 nos 0.48 1.56 C. Milch Cow 14 nos 1.20 5 nos 6.00 5 nos 6.00 4 nos 4.80 16.80 D. Bicycle Repairing 6 nos 0.40 4 nos 1.60 1 no. 0.40 1 no. 0.40 2.40 E. Handloom 23 nos 0.50 11 nos 5.50 8 nos 4.00 4 nos 2.00 11.50 F.Pottary Making 2 nos 0.44 1 no. 0.44 1 no. 0.44 0.88 G. Fruit Processing 10 nos 0.50 4 nos 2.00 3 nos 1.50 3 nos 1.50 5.00 H. Carpenter 8 nos 0.24 3 nos 0.72 3 nos 0.72 2 nos 0.48 1.92 I. Mobile Repairing 3 nos 0.30 3 nos 0.90 nil nil 0.90 J. Bike Repairing 3 nos 0.50 1 no 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1.50 K. Vermi Compost 4 nos 0.225 1no. 0.225 3 nos 0.675 0.90 L. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2 11 nos 0.60 4 nos 2.40 2 nos 1.20 5 nos 3.00 6.60 O. Bamboo Craft 2 nos 0.55 2 nos 1.10 1.10 P. Wood Craft 2 nos 0.55 2 nos 1.10 1.10 R. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.40 2 nos 0.80 0.80 S. Jaru Making 1 no.. 0.30 1 nos 0.30 0.30 T. Tarja Making 8 nos 0.50 3 nos 1.50 3 nos 1.50 2 nos 1.00 4.00 U. Bee-Keeping 8 nos 0.20 2 nos. 0.40 4 nos 0.80 2 nos 0.40 1.60 Total: 131 Nos. 27.71 22.18 22.18 72.06

47

IV. B. Watershed Works phase

Table-M(PA)B1: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas. ( Rs. in lakh )I

Sl n

o

Nam

e of

the

Stat

e N

ame

of th

e D

istr

ict

Nam

e of

Pro

ject

/ M

WS

Type of structures

No.

Are

a ir

riga

ted

(ha)

Stor

age

capa

city

Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Are

a to

be

irri

gate

d (h

a)

Stor

age

capa

city

Estim

ated

co

st

No.

/uni

t

Are

a to

be

bene

fitte

d (h

a)

Stor

age

capa

city

( M3 )

Estim

ated

co

st

Are

a to

be

irri

gate

d (h

a)

Stor

age

capa

city

( M3 )

Estim

ated

co

st

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Mal

oiba

ri

(i) Excavated Pond (In M3) - - - - - - - 4/ 51750 m3 210 36600 29.50 210 36600 29.50

(ii) RCC Check dam (In M2)

- - - - - - - 3/ 47.90 m2 360 50000 17.00 360 50000 17.00

(iii) Drainage Channel (In RM)

- - - - - - - 6/ 13683 rm 850 10000 16.42 850 10000 16.42

(iv) Earthen field bund with core wall (In Rm)

- - - - - - - 1/ 500 rm 300 4000 2.40 300 4000 2.40

v) Earthen bund without core wall (In RM)

- - - - - - - 2/ 2240 rm 120 2500 4.48 120 4.48

(vi) Construction of dist. Canal (In Rm)

- - - - - - - 1/ 1500 rm 100 1800 1.44 100 1.44

vii) Boulder pitching (In m3)

- - - - - - - 1/ 521 m3 100 4.47 100 4.47

(viii) Contour bunding (In Rm)

- - - - - - - 2/ 6835 rm 29 3000 8.20 29 8.20

(ix) Bamboo spur A-type (In Rm)

- - - - - - - 1/ 500 rm 30 2.64 30 2.64

Subtotal - - - - - - - 2099 100600 86.55 2099 100600 86.55

Hah

ara

(i) Construction of dist. Canal (In Rm)

- - - - - - - 4/12700 rm 880 10000 12.19 880 10000 12.19

(ii) Excavated pond (In M3) - - - - - - - 3/ 11000 m3 35 8800 6.27 35 8800 6.27 (iii) Earthen embankment with core wall (In Rm)

- - - - - - - 2/ 1300 rm 70 6.24 70 6.24

(iv) Earthen field bund without core wall (In Rm)

- - - - - - - 1/ 1600 rm 80 3.20 80 3.20

48

(v) RCC Check dam (In M2) - - - - - - - 1/ 28 m2 300 9.94 300 9.94 (vi) Boulder pitching (In M2)

- - - - - - - 1/ 203 m2 30 1.74 30 1.74

Subtotal - - - - - - - 1395 18800 39.58 1395 18800 39.58

Tete

lia

(i) Excavated Pond (In M3) - - - - - - - 7/ 40306 m3 113 30000 22.97 113 30000 22.97 (ii) Construction of dist. Canal (In Rm)

- - - - - - - 5/ 8063 rm 580 5000 7.74 580 5000 7.74

(iii) Earthen embankment with core wall (In Rm)

- - - - - - - 4/ 3498 rm 230 2000 16.79 230 2000 16.79

Subtotal - - - - - - - 923 37000 47.50 923 37000 47.50 Total - - - - - - - 4417 156400 173.63 4417 156400 173.63

49

Table- M(PA)B2: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project area.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

S. No.

Nam

es o

f Sta

tes

Nam

es o

f Dis

tric

ts

Nam

es o

f pro

ject

s

Typ

e of

stru

ctur

es

Pre-project Proposed target Achievement due to project

Change in

irrigated

area (Col. 8-6) (ha)

No.

Area

Irrigated

(ha)

Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging

structures

Construction of new recharging structures

Total target Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging

structures

Construction of new recharging structures

Total achievement

No. Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Estimated cost

No. Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Estimated cost No.

Area irrigated

(ha)

Exp. incurred No.

Area irri-

gated (ha)

Exp. incurre

d

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Exp. To be

incurred

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

(i)Ring wells

14 For drinking purpose

- - - 8 For drinking purpose

From EPA

- From EPA

- - - 8 For drinking purpose

- - -

(ii) Deep Tube well

- - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total for the project: 14 For drinkin

g purpose

- - - 8 For drinking purpose

From EPA

- From EPA

- - - 8 For drinking purpose

From EPA

- - -

50

Table M(PS)B3: Activities proposed for Users groups (UGs) in the project area.

(Rs. in lakhs) 1 2 3 4 6

Sl. No.

Name of

State

Name of

District

Name of

project

Major Activities of the UGs-targets Nos. of UGs

proposed

Estimated Cost

Amount of WDF

to be collected

Structure /Activity proposed MWS Type No. Treatment

(ha.)

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Mal

oiba

ri

(i) Excavated Pond (In M3) 4/ 51750 m3 210 4 29.50 1.48 (ii) RCC Check dam (In M2) 3/ 47.90 m2 360 3 17.00 0.85 (iii) Drainage Channel (In RM) 6/ 13683 rm 850 6 16.42 0.82 (iv) Earthen field bund with core wall (In Rm) 1/ 5000 rm 300 1 2.40 0.12 v) Earthen bund without core wall (In RM) 2/ 2240 rm 120 2 4.48 0.22 (vi) Construction of dist. Canal (In Rm) 1/ 1500 rm 100 1 1.44 0.07 vii) Boulder pitching (In m3) 1/ 521 m3 100 1 4.47 0.22 (viii) Contour bunding (In Rm) 2/ 6835 rm 29 2 8.20 0.41 (ix) Bamboo spur A-type (In Rm) 1/ 500 rm 30 1 2.64 0.13 (x) Protective Aff. (In Ha) 23.5 ha 23.5 6 6.42 0.32 (xi) Rubber plantation in ha. 21.50 ha 21.5 2 15.68 0.78 (xii) Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 3 ha. 3 3 0.45 0.02 (xiii) Cash crop (Zinger) in ha. 0.5 ha 0.50 2 0.79 0.04 (xiv) Cash crop (Turmeric) in ha 0.5 ha 0.50 2 0.73 0.04 (xv) Crop demo (Assam lemon/ papaya) 1 ha 1 4 0.49 0.02

Subtotal 2147 32 111.11 5.46

Hah

ara

(i) Construction of dist. Canal (In Rm) 4/12700 rm 880 4 12.19 0.61 (ii) Excavated pond (In M3) 3/ 11000 m3 35 3 6.27 0.31 (iii) Earthen embankment with core wall (In Rm)

2/ 1300 rm 70 2 6.24 0.31

(iv) Earthen field bund without core wall (In Rm)

1/ 1600 rm 80 1 3.20 0.16

(v) RCC Check dam (In M2) 1/28 m2 300 1 9.94 0.50 (vi) Boulder pitching (In M2) 1/ 203 m2 30 1 1.74 0.09 (vii) Protective Afforestation (In Ha) 7.5 Ha 7.5 5 2.05 0.10 (viii) Rubber Plantation (In Ha) 51 ha 51 5 37.17 1.86 (ix) Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 2 ha 2 2 0.97 0.05

51

(x) Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 1.66 ha 1.66 4 0.25 0.01 Subtotal 1457.16 28 80.02 3.99

Tet

elia

(i) Excavated Pond (In M3) 7/ 40306 m3 126 7 22.94 1.15 (ii) Construction of dist. Canal (In Rm) 5/ 8063 rm 580 5 7.74 0.39 (iii) Earthen embankment with core wall (In Rm)

4/ 3498 rm 230 4 16.79 0.84

(iv) Protective Afforestation (In ha) 13.93 Ha 13.93 6 3.80 0.19 (v) Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 2 ha 2 2 0.30 0.02 (vi) Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha 1ha 1 1 0.49 0.02 (vii) Horticulture Plantation (in ha) 26.9 ha 26.9 4 8.44 0.42 (viii) Rubber Plantation (In Ha) 35 ha 35 5 25.52 1.28 Subtotal 1014.83 34 86.02 3.02

Grand Total: 4619 94 277.15 12.47

52

Table- M(PA)B4: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Group (SHGs) for asset less people in the project area (Rs. in lakhs)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S.

No.

Nam

e of

the

stat

e

Nam

e of

the

Dis

tric

t

Nam

e of

the

proj

ect

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved

Average annual income from activity

per SHG

1 Assam Kamrup Maloibari

A. Piggery – Breaded 12 nos 0.80 B. Duck Rearing 12 nos 0.50 C. Milch Cow 9 nos 0.80 A. Bicycle Repairing 8 nos 0.50 B. Handloom 11 nos 0.80 C.Pottary Making 2 nos 0.50 D. Fruit Processing 4 nos 0.80 E. Carpenter 6 nos 0.50 F. Mobile Repairing 2 nos 0.50 G. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 I. Vermi Compost 5 nos 0.50 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2 9 nos 0.80 K. Bamboo Craft 3 nos 0.50 L. Wood Craft 2 nos 0.50 M. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.50 N. Jaru Making 3 nos 0.50 O. Tarja Making 4 nos 0.50 P. Bee-Keeping 6 nos 0.50

Total: 102 nos Contd……..

* From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, and from column no. 5 to 12, category-wise

totals SHG for the entire country may be mentioned at the end of the table.

53

Table-M(PA)B4: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) for Asset less people in the project area. Contd..

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Nos. of SHGs to be given training

Total assistance received by the SHG (Rs. In Lakh) Total

annual income

generated (Rs. In lakh)

Total annual Savings (Rs. In lakh)

No. of SHGs Graded as

Total Amount of loan

sanctioned by the bank (s)

No. of SHGs

federated Loan from

revolving fund

Training Material Others

(Pl. specify)

I II III

12 nos 1.20 1.20 6.00 10.80 2.40 Not graded Not yet process 12 nos 12 nos 1.20 1.20 2.40 7.20 2.40 Not graded Not yet process 12 nos 9 nos 0.90 0.90 4.50 9.00 2.70 Not graded Not yet process 9 nos 8 nos 0.80 0.80 1.60 4.00 0.80 Not graded Not yet process 8 nos

11 nos 1.10 1.10 3.30 7.70 2.20 Not graded Not yet process 11 nos 2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.40 1.00 0.20 Not graded Not yet process 2 nos 4 nos 0.40 0.40 1.60 2.80 0.40 Not graded Not yet process 4 nos 6 nos 0.60 0.60 1.20 3.00 0.60 Not graded Not yet process 6 nos 2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.40 1.00 0.20 Not graded Not yet process 2 nos 2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.40 1.10 0.30 Not graded Not yet process 2 nos 5 nos 0.60 0.60 0.50 2.20 0.50 Not graded Not yet process 5 nos 9 nos 0.90 0.90 2.70 7.20 2.70 Not graded Not yet process 9 nos 3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.45 1.50 0.45 Not graded Not yet process 3 nos 2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.90 0.20 Not graded Not yet process 2 nos 2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.90 0.20 Not graded Not yet process 2 nos 3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.60 1.50 0.30 Not graded Not yet process 3 nos 4 nos 0.40 0.40 0.60 1.80 0.40 Not graded Not yet process 4 nos 6 nos 0.60 0.60 0.90 3.00 0.90 Not graded Not yet process 6 nos

102 nos 10.30 10.30 28.15 66.60 17.85 102 nos

54

Table-M(PA)B4: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) under production system & micro enterprise in

the project area.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S. N

o.

Nam

e of

the

stat

e

Nam

e of

the

Dis

tric

t

Nam

e of

the

proj

ect Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved

Average annual income from activity

per SHG

1 Assam Kamrup Maloibari

A. Piggery – Breaded 23 0.80 B. Duck Rearing 25 0.50 C. Milch Cow 23 0.80 A. Bicycle Repairing 14 0.50 B. Handloom 34 0.80 C.Pottary Making 4 0.50 D. Fruit Processing 14 0.80 E. Carpenter 14 0.50 F. Mobile Repairing 5 0.50 G. Bike Repairing 5 0.50 I. Vermi Compost 9 0.50 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2 20 0.80 K. Bamboo Craft 5 0.50 L. Wood Craft 4 0.50 M. Blacksmith 4 0.50 N. Jaru Making 4 0.50 O. Tarja Making 12 0.50 P. Bee-Keeping 14 0.50

Grand Total: 233 Nos. Contd…..

55

Table-M(PA)B4: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) under production system & micro enterprise in

the project area.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Nos. of SHGs to be

given training

Total assistance received by the SHG (Rs. In Lakh) Total

annual income

generated (Rs. In lakh)

Total annual Savings (Rs. In lakh)

No. of SHGs Graded as

Total Amount of loan

sanctioned by the bank (s)

No. of SHGs

federated

Loan from

revolving fund

Training Material Others

(Pl. specify)

I II III

23 2.30 2.30 10.35 0 18.4 3.45 Not graded Not processed 23 25 2.50 2.50 12.50 0 21.25 3.75 -do- -do- 25 23 2.30 2.30 11.50 0 19.55 3.45 -do- -do- 23 14 1.40 1.40 7.00 0 11.9 2.1 -do- -do- 14 34 3.40 3.40 17.00 0 28.9 5.1 -do- -do- 34 4 0.40 0.40 0.80 0 2.2 0.6 -do- -do- 4 14 1.40 1.40 3.40 0 8.3 2.1 -do- -do- 14 14 1.40 1.40 2.80 0 7.7 2.1 -do- -do- 14 5 0.50 0.50 1.00 0 2.75 0.75 -do- -do- 5 5 0.50 0.50 1.00 0 2.75 0.75 -do- -do- 5 9 0.90 0.90 1.80 0 4.95 1.35 -do- -do- 9 20 2.00 2.00 4.00 0 11 3 -do- -do- 20 5 0.50 0.50 1.00 0 2.75 0.75 -do- -do- 5 4 0.40 0.40 0.80 0 2.2 0.6 -do- -do- 4 4 0.40 0.40 0.80 0 2.2 0.6 -do- -do- 4 4 0.40 0.40 0.80 0 2.2 0.6 -do- -do- 4 12 1.20 1.20 2.40 0 6.6 1.8 -do- -do- 12 14 1.40 1.40 2.80 0 7.7 2.1 -do- -do- 14

233 Nos. 23.3 23.3 81.75 163.3 34.95 233 Nos.

56

Table-M(PA)B5: Other activities of watershed works phase*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

S. No. St

ate

Dis

tric

t

Nam

es o

f pr

ojec

t Ridge area treatment

Drainage line treatment

Nursery raising Land dev. Crop demon Pasture

dev. Veterinary

services Fishery dev. Non-conv. energy

Any other (please

specify)

Total cost

incurred (Rs. In lakhs) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)

1.

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Not

star

ted

-

Not

star

ted

-

Not

star

ted

-

Not

star

ted

-

Not

star

ted

-

Not

star

ted

-

Not

star

ted

-

Not

star

ted

-

Not

star

ted

-

Not

star

ted

-

Not

rele

vant

57

Table-M(PA)B6: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl. No. St

ate

Dis

tric

t

Proj

ect

Name of structure

Type of treatment Type of land

Executing agency (i)

UG (ii) SHG (iii) Others (pl

spacify)

Target

(i) R

idge

are

a (R

)

(ii) D

rain

age

line

(D)

(iii)

Lan

d de

v. (L

)

(i) P

riva

te

(ii) C

omm

unity

(iii)

Oth

ers (

pl.

spec

ify) No. of units

(No./ cu.m./ Rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy)

M* W O T

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Mal

oiba

ri

(i) Excavated Pond (In M3) L c UG 4/ 51750 m3 5.90 23.60 29.50 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th Year

(ii) RCC Check dam (In M2) c UG 3/ 47.90 m2 11.90 4.25 0.85 17.00 2nd & 3rd Year

(iii) Drainage Channel (In RM) D c

UG 6/ 13683 rm 3.28 13.14 16.42 1st, 2nd, & 4th Year

(iv) Earthen field bund with core wall (In Rm) L c

UG 1/ 500 rm 0.48 1.92 2.40 2nd year

v) Earthen bund without core wall (In RM) L c UG 2/ 2240 rm 0.90 3.58 4.48 2nd & 3rd Year

(vi) Construction of dist. Canal (In Rm) D c UG 1/ 1500 rm 0.29 1.15 1.44 2nd year

vii) Boulder pitching (In m3) L c UG 1/ 521 m3 3.12 1.11 0.24 4.47 1st year

(viii) Contour bunding (In Rm) L c UG 2/ 6835 rm 1.64 6.56 8.20 4th year

(ix) Bamboo spur A-type (In Rm) L c

UG 1/ 500 rm

1.05 1.59 2.64 3rd year

Subtotal 28.56 56.90 1.09 86.55

Hah

ara

(i) Construction of dist. Canal (In Rm) D c UG

4/12700 rm 2.44 9.75 12.19 2nd & 4th year

(ii) Excavated pond (In M3) L c UG 3/ 11000 m3 1.25 5.02 6.27 1st & 3rd year (iii) Earthen embankment with core wall (In Rm) L c

UG 2/ 1300 rm 1.25 4.99 6.24 2nd & 3rd

Year (iv) Earthen field bund without core wall (In Rm) L c

UG 1/ 1600 rm 0.64 2.56 3.20 4th year

(v) RCC Check dam (In M2) D c UG 1/ 28 m2 5.96 3.48 0.50 9.94 3rd year (vi) Boulder pitching (In M2) L c UG 1/ 203 m2 1.04 0.61 0.09 1.74 3rd year

Subtotal c 12.58 26.41 0.59 39.58

58

Tet

elia

(i) Excavated Pond (In M3) L c UG

7/ 40306 m3 4.57 18.36 22.93 2nd, 3rd & 4th Year

(ii) Construction of dist. Canal (In Rm) D c UG

5/ 8063 rm 1.55 6.19 7.74 2nd, 3rd & 4th Year

(iii) Earthen embankment with core wall (In Rm) L c

UG

4/ 3498 rm 0.80 15.99 16.79 2nd & 4th year

Subtotal 6.92 40.54 47.46

Grand Total 48.06 123.85 1.68 173.59

59

Table-M(PA)B7: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl. N

o.

Stat

e

Dis

tric

t

Proj

ect

Name of structure/ work Type of treatment

Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) R

idge

ar

ea (R

)

(ii) D

rain

age

line

(D)

(iii)

Lan

d de

v. (L

)

(i) P

riva

te

(ii)

Com

mun

ity

(iii)

Oth

ers

(pl.

spec

ify) (i) UG (ii)

SHG (iii) Others (pl Specify)

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost (Rs. In Lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/ yyyy)

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Mal

oiba

ri

(i) Protective Aff. (In Ha) R Comm UG 23.50 235000 6.42 3rd & 4th year

(ii) Rubber plantation in ha. R Pvt. Comm UG 21.50 4110 15.68 1st, 2nd & 4th year

(iii) Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. R Pvt. UG 3 0.45 1st year

(iv) Cash crop (Zinger) in ha. R Pvt. UG 0.5 0.79 4th year

(v) Cash crop (Turmeric) in ha R Pvt. UG 0.5 0.73 1st year

(vi) Crop demo (Assam lemon/ papaya)

R Pvt. UG 1 1000 0.49 3rd year

Subtotal 50.00 240110 24.56

Hah

ara (i) Protective Afforestation (In

Ha) R Comm UG 7.50 75000 2.05 2nd, 3rd

& 4th year

(ii) Rubber Plantation (In Ha) R Pvt. Comm UG 51.00 51000 37.18 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th year

(iii) Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha.

L Pvt. UG 2.00 2000 0.97 2nd year

(iv) Crop demo (Paddy) in ha R Pvt. UG 1.66 0.25 4th year

Subtotal 62.16 128000 40.45

Tet

ilia (i) Protective Afforestation (In

ha) R Comm UG 13.93 139300 3.80 2nd, 3rd

& 4th year

(ii) Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. L Pvt. UG 2.00 0.30 2nd year

60

(iii) Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha

L Pvt. UG 1.00 1000 0.49 2nd year

(iv) Horticulture Plantation (in ha)

L Pvt. UG 26.90 26900 8.44 3rd & 4th year

(v) Rubber Plantation (In Ha) R Pvt. Comm UG 35.00 53280 25.52 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th year

Subtotal 78.83 220480 38.55 Grand Total 190.99 588590 103.56

Table-M(PA)B8: Details of allied / other activities

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sl. No. State District Project Name of activity@

Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy) 1. Assam Kamrup Maloibari Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

61

Table-M(PA)B9: Livelihood Proposed to be Created for Asset less People:

Sl. N

o.

Stat

e

Dis

tric

t

Proj

ect

Mic

ro W

S Name of activity@ No. of HH by social group Pre-Project Income (Avg./

HH) in Rs.

Cost per Unit

(In Rs.)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected income per unit

(BC Ratio)

1.

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Tete

lia, H

ahar

a &

Mal

oiba

ri.

SC ST Others Total SC ST Others A. Piggery – Breaded 100 100 30 230 1.20 27.60 100% B. Duck Rearing 80 80 90 250 0.12 3.00 100% C. Milch Cow 70 70 90 230 1.20 27.60 100% D. Bicycle Repairing 40 40 60 140 0.40 5.60 100% E. Handloom 110 110 120 340 0.50 17.00 100% F.Pottary Making 20 10 10 40 0.44 1.76 100% G. Fruit Processing 30 30 80 140 0.50 7.00 100% H. Carpenter 20 20 100 140 0.24 3.36 100% I. Mobile Repairing 10 10 30 50 0.30 1.50 100% J. Bike Repairing 10 10 30 50 0.50 2.50 100% K. Vermi Compost 30 30 30 90 0.225 2.03 100% L. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2

100 50 50 200 0.60 12.00

100%

O. Bamboo Craft 10 10 30 50 0.55 2.75 100% P. Wood Craft 10 10 20 40 0.55 2.20 100% R. Blacksmith 20 10 10 40 0.40 1.60 100% S. Jaru Making 10 10 20 40 0.30 1.20 100% T. Tarja Making 40 40 40 120 0.50 6.00 100% U. Bee-Keeping 40 50 50 140 0.20 2.80 100%

Total: 750 690 890 2330 127.49 -

62

Table-M(PA)B10: Livelihood Proposed to be Created for Farmers

(Rs.. in lakhs) Sl. No.

State District Project Micro WS

Name of activity@

No. of Land owning

HH

No. of HH by social group

Pre-Project Income (Avg./

HH)

Cost per Unit

Estimated cost

Expected income

per unit (BC

Ratio) MF SF LF SC ST Others MF SF LF

1.

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Tete

lia, H

ahar

a &

Mal

oiba

ri.

Nil

Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

Nil

Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

Total: Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

63

Chapter- V Planning Name of district: - Kamrup Name of watershed:- Maloibari Name of Micro watershed:- Maloibari, Hahara & Tetelia

Total Project Area:-6593 ha Treatable Area:-4619 ha Project Cost:-554.28 Lakh

Financial Outlay; Rs. 22.17 lakhs (Financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Table-M(PA)A1: Entry point activities (EPA).

Sl n

o

Stat

e

Dis

tric

t

Nam

e of

the

proj

ect

Entry point activities Estimated cost

Expenditure incurred

Expected outcome Actual outcome

Rem

arks

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Nature conservation and environmental preservation scheme at Teteliguri Gaon

0.85 Aesthetic and for environmental purpose

Wor

ks &

estd

. Cos

t as

pro

pose

d by

PIA

/ Pr

ojec

t Man

ager

Community pond development at Mitoni NC Vill. 0.78 Public utility

Roadside plantation from Golap village to Maloibari chowk (2 km)

3.90 Aesthetic and for environmental purpose

Installation of 8 nos. Ring well under Maloibari IWMP area

4.00 For drinking purpose

Supply of desk bench at Helagog High school 2.00 For students

Community pond development at Rewa village 2.00

Construction of latrine cum Urinal at Maloibari Balika Bidyapith H.S. School

2.00 For use of Students & Teachers

Plantation at Tetelia Market place 1.53

Community development Horty-forestry plantation at Helagog village

2.11 Seedling to be distributed

Construction of foot bridge at Salona village 3.00 Public utility

Total : 22.17

64

TABLE DPR 12: YEAR WISE PHASING OF IWMP PROJECT FOR 5 (FIVE) YEARS PLAN .

Name of district:- Kamrup Name of watershed:- Maloibari Name of Micro watershed:- Maloibari, Hahara & Tetelia

Total Project Area:-6593 ha Treatable Area:-4619 ha Project Cost:-554.28 Lakh

(Rs. in lakhs)

Component 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year Total amount 10% Amount 14% Amount 14% Amount 13% Amount 8% Amount 10% Amount

Administrative 2.5 13.86 2.0 11.09 2.00 11.09 2.0 11.09 1.5 8.31 10.0 55.43 Monitoring 0.1 0.55 0.3 1.66 0.30 1.66 0.3 1.66 0.0 0.00 1.0 5.54 Evaluation 0.4 2.22 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.6 3.33 1.0 5.54 Entry Point Activities 4.0 22.17 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 4.0 22.17 Institution & Capacity Biulding

2.0 11.09 1.0 5.54 1.00 5.54 1.0 5.54 0.0 0.00 5.0 27.71

Detail Project Report (DPR) 1.0 5.54 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 1.0 5.54 Watershed development Works

10.0 55.43 13.7 75.94 13.70 75.94 12.6 69.84 0.0 0.00 50.0 277.14

Livelihood Activities (Asset-less) Production system

0.0 0.00 4.0 22.17 3.00 16.63 3.0 16.63 0.0 0.00 10.0 55.43 0.0 0.00 5.0 27.71 4.00 22.17 4.0 22.17 0.0 0.00 13.0 72.06

Consolidation 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 5.0 27.71 5.0 27.71 Grand Total: 20.00 110.86 26.00 144.11 24.00 133.03 22.90 126.93 7.10 39.35 100.00 554.28

65

TABLE DPR 13: YEARWISE PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL TARGET UNDER WATERSHED WORK PHASE

Name of district:- Kamrup Name of watershed:- Maloibari Name of Micro watershed:- Maloibari, Hahara & Tetelia

Total Project Area:-6593 ha Treatable Area:-4619 ha Project Cost:-554.28 Lakh

(Rs. in Lakhs) Sl. No.

Name of village Name of Schemes Physical target

Unit cost

Year wise financial target 1st

year 2nd year

3rd year

4th year

5th year Total

10% 13.7% 13.7% 12.6% (Consolidat-

ion) 5% 50%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Name of the Micro watershed: MALOIBARI 1 Maloibari

Pathar 1. Earthen Embankment With Core Walling 500 rm 480 2.40 2.40 2. Excavated Pond 15000 m3 57 8.55 8.55 3. Drainage channel (Earthen) 850 rm 120 1.02 1.02 4. Protective Afforestation 1.0 ha. 27300 0.27 0.27 5. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1500 rm 96 1.44 1.44

2 Pub-Maloibari 1. Graded Bundh without core wall 750 rm 200 1.50 1.50 2. Boulder pitching in m2 521 m2 858 4.47 4.47 3. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 8.5 ha. 27300 2.32 2.32

3 Maloibari Gaon 1. Excavated Pond 15000 m3 57 8.55 8.55 2. Construction of Drainage Channel 1500 rm 120 1.80 1.80 3. Earthen embankment without core walling 1490 rm 200 2.98 2.98 4. Protective Afforestation 7.0 ha. 27300 1.91 1.91

4 Maloibari Jungle

1. Excavated Pond 9750 m3 57 5.56 5.56 2. Protective Afforestation 2.0 ha. 27300 0.55 0.55 3. Construction of Drainage Channel 1500 rm 120 1.80 1.80 4. Contour bundh 3000 rm 120 3.60 3.60 5. Bamboo Spur (A-Type) 500 rm 527 2.64 2.64

5 Helagog Pt- 1. RCC Check dam 16 m2 35500 5.68 5.68

66

1,2,3 2. Construction of Drainage Channel 4500 rm 120 5.40 5.40 3. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 4.0 ha. 27300 1.09 1.09 4. Contour Bund 3835 rm 120 4.60 4.60 5. Rubber Plantation (in ha) 19.5 ha. 72900 3.03 11.19 14.22 6. Cash crop (Zinger) in Ha 0.5 ha. 157500 0.79 0.79 7. Cash crop (Turmeric) in ha 0.5 ha 146250 0.73 0.73 8. Crop demonstration (Papaya/ Assam Lemon) in ha 1ha 48600 0.49 0.49 9. Crop demonstration (Paddy) In ha 2 ha. 15000 0.30 0.30

6 Ulubam 1. Construction of Drainage Channel 3333 rm 120 4.00 4.00 2. RCC check dam 16.90 M2 35500 6.00 6.00 3. Protective Afforestation 1.0 ha. 27300 0.27 0.27 4. Rubber Plantation in ha 2 ha. 72900 1.46 1.46 5. Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0.15

7 Salona Gaon 1. Construction of Drainage Channel 2000 rm 120 2.40 2.40 3. RCC Checkdam 15 m2 35500 5.32 5.32 5. Excavated Pond 12000 m3 57 6.84 6.84

Sub Total: 20.92 20.42 33.05 36.71 111.10 Name of the Micro watershed: HAHARA 0.00 8 Mitoni NC 1. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri

Field (Earthen) 1500 rm 96 1.44 1.44 2. Rubber Plantation 10 ha 72900 7.29 7.29 3. Excavated Pond 2000 m3 57 1.14 1.14 4. Protective Afforestation 3.0 ha. 27300 0.82 0.82

9 Amara Pathar 1. Graded Bund 1000 rm 480 4.80 4.80 2. Protective Afforestation 1.5 ha. 27300 0.41 0.41 4. Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 1 ha. 48600 0.486 0.49

10 Hahara gaon 1. Rubber Plantation 10 ha. 72900 7.29 7.29 1. Rubber Plantation 10 ha. 72900 7.29 7.29 2. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 8000 rm 96 7.68 7.68 3. Graded Bund without core wall 1600 rm 200 3.20 3.20

67

11 Hahara NC Gaon

1. Earthen Embankment With Core Walling 300 rm 480 1.44 1.44 2. Rubber Plantation 20 ha. 72900 14.58 14.58 3. RCC check dam 28 m2 35500 9.94 9.94 4. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 1.0 ha. 27300 0.27 0.27 5. Const. of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 2000 rm 96 1.92 1.92 6. Excavated Pond 5000 m3 57 2.85 2.85

12 Bagibari 1. Excavated Pond 4000 m3 57 2.28 2.28 2. Protective Afforestation 1.0 ha. 27300 0.27 0.27 3. Boulder pitching 203 m2 858 1.74 1.74 4 Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 1 ha. 48600 0.486 0.49

13 Hahara Pathar 1. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1200 rm 96 1.15 1.15 2. Rubber Plantation 1.0 ha. 72900 0.73 0.73 3. Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 1.66 ha. 15000 0.25 0.25 4. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 1.0 ha. 27300 0.27 0.27

Sub Total: 18.97 21.11 25.92 14.02 80.02 Name of the Micro watershed: TETELIA 0.00

14 Rewa NC 1. Rubber Plantation 19 ha. 72900 13.85 13.85 2. Excavated Pond 6824 m3 57 3.89 3.89 3. Protective Afforestation 2.5 ha. 27300 0.68 0.68 3. Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0.15

15 Tetelia Gaon 1. Rubber Plantation 1 ha. 72900 0.73 0.73 2. Protective Afforestation 1.5 ha. 27300 0.41 0.41 3. Horticulture Plantation 7.5 ha. 31370 2.35 2.35 4. Excavated Pond 15982 m3 57 9.11 9.11 5. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1500 rm 96 1.44 1.44

16 Teteliguri NC 1. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 0.5 ha. 27300 0.14 0.14 2. Earthen Embankment with core Walling 350 rm 480 1.68 1.68 3. Excavated Pond 4500 m3 57 2.56 2.56 4. Narrow Strip-Trans Planting 8.0 ha. 31370 2.50 2.50

68

17 Tegheria No.1 1. Rubber Plantation 5 ha. 72900 3.65 3.65 2. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 2063 rm 96 1.98 1.98 3. Graded Bundh 1448 Rm 480 6.95 6.95 4. Horticulture Plantation 10.40 ha. 31370 3.25 3.25

18 Teteliguri Gaon 1. Rubber Plantation 5 ha. 72900 3.65 3.65 2. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1500 rm 96 1.44 1.44 3. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 4.43 ha. 27300 1.21 1.21 4. Excavated Pond 3000 m3 57 1.71 1.71 5. Graded Bundh 1200 rm 480 5.76 5.76

19 Lumsung NC 1. Rubber Plantation 5.0 ha. 72900 3.65 3.65 2. Protective Afforestation 2.0 ha. 27300 0.54 0.54 3. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1000 rm 96 0.96 0.96 4. Narrow Strip-Trans Planting 1 ha. 31370 0.31 0.31 5. Excavated Pond 3000 m3 57 1.71 1.71

20 Rewa Gaon 1. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 2000 rm 96 1.92 1.92 2. Excavated Pond 4000 m3 57 2.28 2.28 3. Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 15000 0.15 0.15 4 Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 1 ha. 48600 0.486 0.49

21 Lumsung Gaon 1. Graded Bundh 500 rm 480 2.40 2.40 2. Excavated Pond 3000 m3 57 1.71 1.71 3. Protective Afforestation 3.0 ha. 27300 0.82 0.82

Sub Total: 15.55 34.41 16.97 19.10 86.03 Grand Total: 55.44 75.94 75.94 69.83 277.15

69

TABLE DPR 14: YEAR WISE PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL TARGET UNDER WATERSHED WORK PHASE:

Name of district:- Kamrup Name of watershed:- Maloibari Name of Micro watershed:- Maloibari, Hahara & Tetelia

Total Project Area:-6593 ha Treatable Area:-4619 ha Project Cost:-554.28 Lakh

Name of Watershed: Maloibari A- First Year Financial Year: 2009-10 Financial Target: 55.43 Lakhs.

Name of Micro

Watershed

Name of Villages Name of Schemes No. Unit Cost

(Rs. In Lakhs)

Area to be

benefitted

Estimated Cost No. of Benefic

iary

No. of Mandays.

M W O T

1 Pub Maloibari Boulder pitching in M2 521 858 100 3.12 1.11 0.24 4.47 130 1110 2 Helagog Const. of drainage channel in Rm 4500 120 200 1.08 4.32 0 5.40 53 4320

Cash crop (Turmeric) in ha 0.5 146250 0.5 0.29 0.44 0.73 2 440

Crop demo (Paddy) In ha 2 15000 2 0.12 0.18 0.30 2 180

Rubber plantation in ha. 4.16 72900 4.16 1.21 1.82 0 3.03 5 1820

3 Ulubam Crop demo (Paddy) In ha 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0.15 1 90

4 Salona gaon Excavated pond in M3 12000 57 50 1.36 5.48 0 6.84 55 5480

Sub Total: 357.66 7.24 13.44 0.24 20.92 248 13440 Hahara MWS

5 Mitoni NC Rubber plantation in ha. 10 72900 10 2.92 4.38 0 7.29 13 4380 6 Hahara N C RCC Check dam in M2 28 35500 300 5.96 3.48 0.5 9.94 410 3480 7 Bagibari Boulder pitching in M2 203 858 30 1.21 0.43 0.1 1.74 40 430

Sub Total: 340.0 10.09 8.29 0.6 18.97 463 8290 Tetelia MWS

8 Rewa NC Rubber plantation in ha. 19 72900 19 5.54 8.31 0 13.85 20 8310 Crop demo (Paddy) In ha 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0.15 1 90

9 Tetelia gaon Rubber plantation in ha. 1 72900 1 0.29 0.44 0 0.73 4 440 10 Lumsung Gaon Protective afforestation in ha 3 27300 3 0.33 0.49 0.82 33 490

Sub Total: 24.0 6.22 9.33 0 15.55 58 9330 Year Total: 721.66 23.55 31.06 0.84 55.44 769 31060

70

Name of Watershed: Maloibari B 2nd year Financial Year: 2010-11 Financial Target: 75.94 Lakhs.

Name of Micro

Watershed

Name of Villages Name of Schemes No. Unit Cost (Rs.)

Area to be benefitted

Estimated Cost No. of Beneficiary

No. of Manday

s. M W O T

Maloibari MWS

1 Maloibari pathar Earthen embankment with core wall in Rm 500 480 300 0.48 1.92 0 2.40 102 1920 Drainage channel (earthen) in Rm 850 120 80 0.20 0.42 0 1.02 27 420

Protective afforestation in ha 1 27300 1 0.1 0.17 0 0.27 2 170 2 Pub Maloibari Graded bund in Rm 750 200 40 0.3 1.2 0 1.50 15 1200 3 Maloibari gaon Drainage channel in Rm 1500 120 100 0.36 1.44 0 1.80 35 1440 4 Maloibari Jungle Excavated pond in M3 9750 57 40 1.11 4.45 0 5.56 18 4450 5 Helagog Protective afforestation in ha. 4 27300 4 0.43 0.66 0 1.09 3 660 6 Ulubam Rubber plantation in ha. 2 72900 2 0.58 0.88 1.46 880 7 Salona gaon RCC check dam in M2 15 35500 100 3.19 1.86 0.27 5.32 35 1860

Sub Total: 667 6.75 13 0.27 20.42 237 13000 Hahara MWS

8 Mitoni NC Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 1500 96 100 0.28 1.16 0 1.44 135 1160 9 Amara pather Protective afforestation in ha. 1.5 27300 1.5 0.16 0.25 0 0.41 3 250 Crop demo. (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 1 48600 1 0.19 0.296 0 0.49 4 296

10 Hahara gaon Rubber plantation in ha. 10 72900 10 2.91 4.38 0 7.29 15 4380 Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 8000 96 500 1.53 6.15 0 7.68 660 6150

11 Hahara NC gaon Earthen embankment with core wall in Rm 300 480 30 0.28 1.16 0 1.44 40 1160 Crop demo. (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 1 48600 1 0.19 0.296 0 0.49 2 296

12 Hahara pather Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 1200 96 80 0.23 0.92 0 1.15 110 920 Rubber plantation in ha. 1 72900 1 0.29 0.44 0 0.73 2 440 Sub Total: 724.5 6.06 15.052 0 21.11 971 15052

Tetelia MWS

13 Rewa NC Excavated pond in M3 6824 57 14 0.77 3.12 0 3.89 7 3120 14 Tetelia gaon Excavated pond in M3 15982 57 60 1.82 7.29 0 9.11 23 7290 15 Teteliguri NC Protective afforestation in ha. 0.5 27300 0.5 0.05 0.09 0 0.14 1 90 Excavated pond in M3 4500 57 10 0.51 2.05 0.00 2.56 5 2050

16 Tegheria No. 1 Graded bund in Rm 1448 480 80 1.39 5.56 0 6.95 32 5560 17 Teteliguri gaon Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 1500 96 100 0.28 1.16 0 1.44 34 1160 Excavated pond in M3 3000 57 8 0.34 1.37 0 1.71 4 1370 18 Lumsung NC Rubber plantation in ha. 5 72900 5 1.46 2.19 0 3.65 4 2190 19 Rewa gaon Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 2000 96 200 0.38 1.54 0 1.92 60 1540 Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 1 15000 1 0.06 0.09 0 0.15 1 90 Crop demo. (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 1 48600 1 0.19 0.296 0 0.49 2 296

20 Lumsung gaon Graded bund in Rm 500 480 20 0.48 1.92 0 2.40 8 1920 Sub Total: 499.5 7.73 26.676 0 34.40 181 26676 Year wise Total: 1891 20.54 54.73 0.31 75.93 1389 54728

71

Name of Watershed: Maloibari C: 3rd year Financial Year: 2011-12 Financial Target: 75.94 Lakhs.

Name of Micro

Watershed

Name of Villages Name of Schemes No. Unit Cost

(Rs. In Lakhs)

Area to be

benefitted

Estimated Cost No. of Beneficiary

No. of Mandays.

M W O T

Maloibari MWS

1 Maloibari pather Excavated pond in M3 15000 57 60 1.71 6.84 0 8.55 80 6840 Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 1500 96 100 0.28 1.16 0 1.44 130 1160

2 Pub Maloibari Protective afforestation in ha 8.50 27300 8.50 0.92 1.4 0.00 2.32 9 1400 3 Maloibari gaon Earthen embankment without core wall in

Rm 1490 200 80 0.60 2.38 0 2.98 90 2380

4 Maloibari Jungle Protective afforestation in ha 2 27300 2 0.22 0.33 0.00 0.55 5 330 Bamboo spur (A - Type) in Rm 500 527 30 1.05 1.59 0 2.64 40 1590 5 Helagog RCC Check dam in M2 16 35500 120 3.41 1.99 0.28 5.68 169 1988

Crop demo (Assam lemon/ papaya) 1 48600 1 0.20 0.29 0.49 2 290 6 Salona Gaon Const. of drainage chanal in Rm 2000 120 100 0.48 1.92 0 2.40 60 1920 7 Ulubam RCC Check dam in M2 16.90 35500 140 3.60 2.1 0.3 6.00 180 2100

Sub Total: 641.5 12.468 19.998 0.58 33.04 765 19998 Hahara MWS

8 Mitoni NC Excavated pond in M3 2000 57 5 0.22 0.92 0 1.14 7 920 9 Amara pather Graded bund (With Core wall) in Rm 1000 480 40 0.96 3.84 0 4.80 52 3840 10 Hahara NC gaon Rubber plantation in ha. 20 72900 20 5.83 8.75 0 14.58 13 8750 Excavated pond in M3 5000 57 10 0.57 2.28 0 2.85 13 2280

11 Bagibari Excavated pond in M3 4000 57 10 0.45 1.83 0 2.28 7 1830 12 Hahara pathar Protective afforestation in ha 1 27300 1 0.10 0.17 0 0.27 2 170

Sub total:- 86 8.13 17.79 0 25.92 94 17790 Tetelia MWS 13 Rewa NC Protective afforestation in ha 2.5 27300 2.5 0.27 0.41 0 0.68 3 410

14 Tetelia gaon Protective afforestation in ha 1.5 27300 1.5 0.16 0.25 0 0.41 2 250 Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 1500 96 100 0.28 1.16 0 1.44 115 1160

15 Teteliguri NC Earthen embankment with core wall (In RM) 350 480 55 0.33 1.35 0.00 1.68 55 1350 16 tegheria No. 1 Rubber plantation in ha. 5 72900 5 1.46 2.19 0 3.65 6 2190

Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 2063 96 80 0.39 1.59 0.00 1.98 105 1590 Horticulture plantation in ha. 10.4 31370 10.4 1.30 1.95 0 3.25 14 1950

17 Teteliguri gaon Protective afforestation in ha 4.43 27300 4.43 0.48 0.73 0 1.21 6 730 18 Lumsung NC Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 1000 96 100 0.19 0.77 0 0.96 110 770 19 Lumsing gaon Excavated pond in M3 3000 57 10 0.34 1.37 0 1.71 14 1370

Sub total:- 368.83 5.2 11.77 0 16.97 430 11770 Year wise Total:- 1096.33 25.80 49.56 0.58 75.93 1289 49558

72

Name of Watershed: Maloibari D: 4th year Financial Year: 2012-13 Financial Target: 69.84 Lakhs.

Name of Micro

Watershed

Name of Villages Name of Schemes No. Unit Cost

(Rs. In Lakhs)

Area to be

benefitted

Estimated Cost No. of Beneficiary

No. of Mandays. M W O T

Maloibari MWS

1 Maloibari gaon Excavated pond in M3 15000 57 60 1.71 6.84 0.00 8.55 80 6840 Protective afforestation (In Ha) 7 27300 7 0.76 1.15 0.00 1.91 9 1150 2 Maloibari Jungle Const. of drainage channel in Rm 1500 120 120 0.36 1.44 0.00 1.80 160 1440 Contour bund in Rm 3000 120 14 0.72 2.88 0.00 3.60 19 2880 3 Helagog Contour bund in Rm 3835 120 15 0.92 3.68 0.00 4.60 20 3680

Cash crop (Zinger) in ha. 0.5 157500 0.5 0.32 0.47 0.79 1 470 Rubber plantation in ha 15.34 72900 15.34 4.47 6.72 0.00 11.19 20 6720

4 Ulubam Const. of drainage channel in Rm 3333 120 250 0.80 3.20 0.00 4.00 330 3200 Protective afforestation in ha 1 27300 1 0.1 0.17 0 0.27 1 170

Sub Total 482.84 10.16 26.55 0.00 36.71 640 26550 Hahara MWS

5 Mitoni NC Protective afforestation (In Ha) 3 27300 3 0.32 0.50 0.00 0.82 4 500 6 Hahara gaon Rubber plantation in ha. 10 72900 10 2.91 4.38 0 7.29 14 4380 Graded bund without core wall in

Rm 1600 200 80 0.64 2.56 0.00 3.20 110 2560

Protective afforestation in ha 1 27300 1 0.10 0.17 0 0.27 2 170 Const. of dist. Canal in Rm 8000 96 200 0.38 1.54 0.00 1.92 55 1540

7 Bagibari Protective afforestation in ha 1 27300 1 0.10 0.17 0 0.27 2 170 8 Hahara pather Crop demo (Paddy) in Ha. 1.66 15000 1.66 0.10 0.15 0 0.25 2 150

Sub Total 296.66 4.55 9.47 0.00 14.02 189 9470 Tetelia MWS 9 Tetelia gaon Horticulture plantation in ha. 7.5 31370 7.5 0.94 1.41 0.00 2.35 10 1410

10 Teteliguri NC Narrow strip transplanting in ha. 8 31370 8 1.00 1.50 0.00 2.50 10 1500 11 Teteliguri gaon Rubber plantation in ha 5 72900 5 1.46 2.19 0 3.65 7 2190

Graded bund in Rm 1200 480 80 1.15 4.61 0.00 5.76 105 4610 12 Lumsing NC Protective afforestation in ha 2 27300 2 0.22 0.33 0.00 0.55 3 330

Narrow strip transplanting in ha. 1 31370 1 0.12 0.19 0.00 0.31 2 190 Excavated pond in M3 3000 57 10 0.34 1.37 0 1.71 14 1370

13 Rewa gaon Excavated pond in M3 4000 57 17 0.45 1.83 0.00 2.28 17 1830 0

Sub Total 130.5 5.68 13.43 0.00 19.11 168 13430 Year wise total 910 20.39 49.45 0.00 69.84 997 49450

Grand Total for the Project 4619 90.28 184.80 1.73 277.13 4444 184796

73

Table DPR 15: Village wise GPS Points:

Sl. No.

Name of village

Name of Schemes Physical target

GPS Station Latitute Longitute Elevition

1 2 3 4

Name of the Micro watershed: MALOIBARI 1 Maloibari Pathar 1. Earthen Embankment With Core Walling 500 rm 26010/16.3// 90006/20.7// 60 mt

2. Excavated Pond 15000 m3 3. Drainage channel (Earthen) 850 rm 4. Protective Afforestation 1.0 ha. 5. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1500 rm

2 Pub-Maloibari 1. Graded Bundh without core wall 750 rm 2. Boulder pitching in m2 521 m2 26010/36.6// 92007/34.8// 55 mt

3. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 8.5 ha. 3 Maloibari Gaon 1. Excavated Pond 15000 m3

2. Construction of Drainage Channel 1500 rm 26010/10.6// 92005/41.8// 51 mt

3. Earthen embankment without core walling 1490 rm 4. Protective Afforestation 7.0 ha.

4 Maloibari Jungle 1. Excavated Pond 9750 m3 2. Protective Afforestation 2.0 ha. 3. Construction of Drainage Channel 1500 rm 2609/56.6// 9207/7.1// 53 mt 4. Contour bundh 3000 rm 5. Bamboo Spur (A-Type) 500 rm

5 Helagog Pt-1,2,3 1. RCC Check dam 16 m2 26007/39.6// 92003/44.8// 61 mt

2. Construction of Drainage Channel 4500 rm 3. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 4.0 ha. 4. Contour Bund 3835 rm 5. Rubber Plantation (in ha) 19.5 ha. 6. Cash crop (Zinger) in Ha 0.5 ha. 7. Cash crop (Turmeric) in ha 0.5 ha 8. Crop demonstration (Papaya/ Assam Lemon) in ha 1ha 9. Crop demonstration (Paddy) In ha 2 ha.

6 Ulubam 1. Construction of Drainage Channel 3333 rm 2. RCC check dam 16.90 M2 26007/11.5// 92005/15.2// 48 mt 3. Protective Afforestation 1.0 ha. 4. Rubber Plantation in ha 2 ha. 5. Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 1 ha.

7 Salona Gaon 1. Construction of Drainage Channel 2000 rm 3. RCC Checkdam 15 m2 26007/34.6// 92004/49.6// 53 mt

5. Excavated Pond 12000 m3 Sub Total:

74

Name of the Micro watershed: HAHARA 8 Mitoni NC 1. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1500 rm 26010/46.9// 9204/34.6// 50 mt

2. Rubber Plantation 10 ha 3. Excavated Pond 2000 m3 4. Protective Afforestation 3.0 ha.

9 Amara Pathar 1. Graded Bund 1000 rm 26012/10.8// 92002/05.4// 67 mt

2. Protective Afforestation 1.5 ha. 4. Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 1 ha.

10 Hahara gaon 1. Rubber Plantation 10 ha. 1. Rubber Plantation 10 ha. 26010/24.7// 92002/00.4// 53 mt

2. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 8000 rm 3. Graded Bund without core wall 1600 rm

11 Hahara NC Gaon 1. Earthen Embankment With Core Walling 300 rm

2. Rubber Plantation 20 ha. 3. RCC check dam 28 m2 26010/00.1// 92002/34.5// 54 mt

4. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 1.0 ha. 5. Const. of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 2000 rm 6. Excavated Pond 5000 m3

12 Bagibari 1. Excavated Pond 4000 m3 2. Protective Afforestation 1.0 ha. 3. Boulder pitching 203 m2 26011/35.9// 92003/47.3// 62 mt

4 Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 1 ha. 13 Hahara Pathar 1. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1200 rm 26011/03.8// 92001/42.2// 60 mt

2. Rubber Plantation 1.0 ha. 3. Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 1.66 ha. 4. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 1.0 ha.

Sub Total: Name of the Micro watershed: TETELIA

14 Rewa NC 1. Rubber Plantation 19 ha. 2609/21.5// 9204/7.4// 55 mt 2. Excavated Pond 6824 m3 3. Protective Afforestation 2.5 ha. 3. Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 1 ha.

15 Tetelia Gaon 1. Rubber Plantation 1 ha. 2. Protective Afforestation 1.5 ha. 3. Horticulture Plantation 7.5 ha. 4. Excavated Pond 15982 m3 5. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1500 rm 26007/23.5// 92002/21.3// 55 mt

16 Teteliguri NC 1. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 0.5 ha. 2. Earthen Embankment with core Walling 350 rm 2609/14.4// 9201/56.0// 52 mt

3. Excavated Pond 4500 m3 4. Narrow Strip-Trans Planting 8.0 ha.

17 Tegheria No.1 1. Rubber Plantation 5 ha. 2. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 2063 rm 26006/51// 92003/40.5// 61 mt

75

3. Graded Bundh 1448 Rm 4. Horticulture Plantation 10.40 ha.

18 Teteliguri Gaon 1. Rubber Plantation 5 ha. 2. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1500 rm 26008/42.3// 92001/57.2// 58 mt

3. Protective Afforestation/ Bamboo Plantation 4.43 ha. 4. Excavated Pond 3000 m3 5. Graded Bundh 1200 rm

19 Lumsung NC 1. Rubber Plantation 5.0 ha. 2. Protective Afforestation 2.0 ha. 3. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 1000 rm 2608/33.3// 9203/53.4// 55 mt

4. Narrow Strip-Trans Planting 1 ha. 5. Excavated Pond 3000 m3

20 Rewa Gaon 1. Constuction of Distribution Canals for Agri Field (Earthen) 2000 rm 26008/51.5// 92003/14.0// 55 mt

2. Excavated Pond 4000 m3 3. Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. 1 ha. 4 Crop demo (Papaya/Assam Lemon) in ha. 1 ha.

21 Lumsung Gaon 1. Graded Bundh 500 rm 26007/58.3// 92002/47.4// 58 mt

2. Excavated Pond 3000 m3 3. Protective Afforestation 3.0 ha.

76

Chapter VI - Institutional Structures

Table-M(IS)9: Details of Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project area.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

S. N

o.

Nam

e of

th

e St

ate

Nam

e of

th

e D

istr

ict

Nam

e of

pr

ojec

t Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members (Proposed New SHG)

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only

Women

With both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

Under process

(i) Landless 202 808 1010 71 333 404 37 148 185 (ii) SF 176 704 880 70 282 352 196 784 980 (iii) MF 88 352 440 34 142 176 - - -

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - Total - - - - 466 1864 2330 175 757 932 233 932 1165

(M – Male, F – Female)

From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, from column 5 to 8, category-wise grand totals, may be given for the entire country at the end of the table.

Table-M(IS)10: Details of UGs in the project area:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

S. No. St

ate

Dis

tric

t

Proj

ect Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in

each category No. of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1

Ass

am

Kam

rup

Mal

oiba

ri

- - 94 Nos.

94 Nos.

(i) Landless 789 339 1128 215 95 310 215 95 310 (ii) SF 329 141 470 110 50 160 0 0 0 (iii) MF 197 85 282 105 45 150 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1316 564 1880 430 190 620 215 95 310 (M – Male, F – Female) * From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, from columns 5 to 8, category-wise grand totals, for the entire country may be given at the end of the table.

77

Chapter VII - Capacity Building

Table-M(CB)2: Capacity Building activities for the year

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl. No. State Project

Stakeholders Total no.

of persons

No. of persons

trained so far

No. of persons to be trained during current financial

year

No. of persons trained during

current financial year

Sources of funding for training

Funds utilized

a) DoLR b)Any other (pl. specify)

a) DoLR

b)Any other (pl. specify)

1 Assam Kamrup Maloibari

SLNA - - - - - - - - DRDA/ZP cell - - - - - - - - PIAs 15 Nil. 15 Nil DoLR - Nil - WDTs 15 Nil 15 Nil DoLR - Nil - UGs 1880 Nil 236 Nil DoLR - Nil - SHGs 2330 Nil 498 Nil DoLR - Nil - WCs 30 Nil 30 Nil DoLR - Nil GPs 12 Nil 12 Nil DoLR - Nil - Community - - - - - - - - Others (Pl. specify)

- - - - - - - -

Total: 4282 806 * From Column no. 2, total no. of States implementing the programme, from Column no. 4 to 7, Stakeholder-wise totals may be given at the end of the table for the entire country

78

Table-M(CB)3: Information, Education & Communication (IEC) activities for the year 2010-11.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S.

No. State/Dist/Proj. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expenditure incurred (Rs.)

Outcome (may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Assam Kamrup Maloibari

1. Awareness campaign 2. Capacity building

PIA PIA

To be decided by SLNA Nil Nil

- -

Total: - * From Column no. 2, total no. of States implementing the programme, from Column no. 4, total no. of agencies, from column no. 5 & 6, totals may be given at the end of the table for the entire country.

=00=

79

80

81

82

83