determination of risk, risk classification · 23/04/2018 the acceptability of risk 40 safety risk -...

54
DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION Lecture 8.

Upload: others

Post on 02-Sep-2019

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

DETERMINATION OF RISK,

RISK CLASSIFICATION

Lecture 8.

Page 2: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40

Safety Risk - Reminder

• The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called „safety risk”.

• Safety risk is the combination of the :

• (predicted) frequency or probability,

• and the severity of the consequences or outcomes of

• a hazard.

• The safety risk can be influenced by other risk parameters.

• The risk can be determined by:

• quantitatively,

• or risk classification/qualitatively.

Severity

Frequency

Risk

Page 3: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 41

Summary of Basic Risks

Page 4: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 42

Summary of Basic Risks

Page 5: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 43

Quantitive Risk Determination, Example - 1

• Failure of a particular component is likely to result in an explosion that could kill 100

people. It is estimated, that this component will fail once in every 10 000 years.

• What is the risk associated with this component?

• 𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑘 = 𝑠𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑥 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦

• 𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑘 = 100 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ𝑠 𝑥 0.00011

𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟

• 𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑘 = 0.01𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ

𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟

Page 6: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 44

Quantitive Risk Determination, Example - 2

• In a country with a population of 50 000 000, approximately 25 people are killed each

year by lightning. What is the risk associated with death from this cause?

• The fraction of the population killed per year is 25/50 000 000= 5x10-7.

• The associated risk may be expressed by saying that each individual has a probability of

5x10-7 of being killed by lightning in any given year in the given country.

• Alternatively we could say that the population as a whole is exposed to a risk of 5x10-7

deaths per person-year.

Page 7: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 45

Damage, Injuries

• transport is a hazardous facility, it endangers thesafety of:

• persons,

• objects,

• environment.

• 𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑠 = 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ𝑠 + 0.1 𝑥 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 +0.01 𝑥 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠

• 1 𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑚 = 1 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ = 10 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 == 100 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠

• eg. from an accident insurrance:

Page 8: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 46

Individual Risk

• Example:

• rockfall in a railway section once in 10 years,

• there are 100 trains in a year,

• a train passes trought this hazardous section under 4 sec.

person

death

day

year

trip

tripevent

year

dayyear

eventDaHRRi iii 1

sec606024

100sec

4

36510

1

yearperson

deathRii

6102,1• HRi = hazard rate

• Dai = damage

Page 9: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 47

Collective Risk

• the sum of the individual risks

• Eg.

• in a train, there are 650 passengers:

year

deathRi

yearperson

deathpersonRiRi

o

io

4108,7

6102,1650

Page 10: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 48

Connection between RAMS Components

• D Danger

• H Hazard

• HR Hazard Rate

• Da Damage

• Ri Risk

• S Safety

• R Reliability

• A Availability

• M Maintainibility

• µ Repair Rate

• λ Failure Rate

• t Time

• P Probability

• Riunuzul Unacceptable Risk

Page 11: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

Risk Classification

Page 12: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 50

Risk Classification

• In such cases severity and frequency data must be combined in less mechanical way

(severity x frequency).

• The result of this process is a risk classification of the risk associated with a particular

hazard.

• This classification is sometimes called a risk class, a risk level or a risk factor.

• Used and categorized parameters could be:

• severity,

• frequency,

• controllability etc…

Page 13: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 51

Consequence Categories – Severity, Examples, EN 50126

CENELEC EN 50126-1:2017, Railway applications - The Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) - Part 1: Generic RAMS process

Page 14: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 52

Consequence Categories – Severity, Examples, EN 50126

Page 15: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 53

Consequence Categories – Severity, Examples, EN 50126

Page 16: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 54

Consequence Categories – Severity, Examples, EN 50126

Page 17: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 55

Consequence Categories – Severity, Examples

Software Testing & Analysis (F22ST3) Safety-Critical Systems Andrew Ireland School of Mathematical and Computer Science Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh

Page 18: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 56

Frequency Categories – Examples, EN 50126

Page 19: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 57

Frequency Categories – Examples, EN 50126

Page 20: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 58

Frequency Categories – Examples

Software Testing & Analysis (F22ST3) Safety-Critical Systems Andrew Ireland School of Mathematical and Computer Science Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh

Page 21: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 59

Risk Acceptance Categories – Examples, EN 50126

Page 22: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 60

Risk Classification – Examples, EN 50126

Page 23: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 61

Risk Classification – Examples

Software Testing & Analysis (F22ST3) Safety-Critical Systems Andrew Ireland School of Mathematical and Computer Science Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh

Page 24: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 62

Risk Classification – Examples

Page 25: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 63

Severity Categories

(Vehicle Industry, AAAM, ISO 26262)

• AIS 0: no injury

• AIS 1: minor injury (skin damage, muscle pain…)

• AIS 2: moderate injury (deeper cutting damage, less, than 12 hours of loss of

consciousness)

• AIS 3: serious injury (bone fracture [not skull], joint injury…)

• AIS 4: severe injury with probable survival (severe bone injury, less, than 12 hours of

loss of consciousness)

• AIS 5: critical injury, life-threatening injury with uncertain possibility to survive (more,

than 12 hours of loss of consciousness, internal bleeding…)

• AIS 6: maximum injury, fatal injury, death

Page 26: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 64

Severity Categories – ISO 26262

AIS

Page 27: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 65

Severity Classsification – Examples, ISO 26262

• S0: bumps with roadside infrastructure/damage entering or exiting parking space,

• S1: side impact with a narrow stationary object, eg. crashing into a tree with very low

speed/collision with minimal vehicle overlap (10% to 20%),

• S2: side collision with a passenger car (eg. intrudes upon passenger compartment) with

very low speed/pedestrian or bicycle accident while turning (city intersection and

streets),

• S3: side impact with a narrow stationary object, eg. crashing into a tree with medium

speed/ reaor or front collision with another passenger car with medium speed

Page 28: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 66

Frequency – ISO 26262

• Categories: E0, E1, E2, E3, E4

• E0 is assigned to situations which, altough identified during a hazard and risk analysis,

are considered to be unusual or incredible

• eg. a vehicle involved in an accident which includes an aeroplane landing on highway

• remaining levels (E1, E2, E3, E4) are assigned for situations that can become hazardous

depending either the duration of a situation (temporal overlap) or the frequency of

occurrence of a situation

Page 29: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 67

Frequency Categories – ISO 26262

• based on the duration:

• based on the frequency:

Page 30: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 68

Controllability – ISO 26262

• ability to avoid a specified harm or damage through the timely reactions of the persons

involved, possibly with support from external measures

• persons involved can be include the driver, passengers or persons in the vicinity of the vehicle’s

exterior,

• external measure: measure, that is separate an distinct from the item which reduces or mitigates the

risk

Page 31: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 69

Controllability and Hazardous Events – Examples, ISO

26262

• C0 (everybody): unexpected radio volume increase – maintain intended driving path,

• C1 (99%+): faulty adjustment of seat position while driving – brake to slow/stop

vehicle,

• C2 (90%+): failure of ABS during emergency breaking - maintain intended driving path,

• C3 (90%-): failure of brakes - maintain intended driving path, stay in lane.

Page 32: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 70

Risk Classification – ISO 26262

risk categories:

negligible (QM – quality

managemenet needed),

A (very low probability) –

D (high, having resonable

possibility)

Page 33: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 71

Risk Graph – General Scheme (IEC 61508)

Page 34: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 72

Risk Graph – General Scheme (IEC 61508)

Page 35: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 73

Risk Graph – General Scheme (IEC 61508)

Page 36: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 74

Risk Graph - Example

Door Closing System – Inadvertent Operation

C1

C2

F2

P1

P2

P1

P2

F1

F2

C3

C4

F1

1

2

3

4

5

6 7

6

5

4

3

2

1

7

8

6

5

4

3

2

1

W3 W2 W1 Risk parameter Classification

Consequence(Severity)

C1 Minor injury

C2Serious permanent injury to one or more persons;death to one person

C3 Death to several peopleC4 Very many people killed

Frequency of, andexposure time in, the hazardous zone.

F1 Rare to more often exposure in the hazardous zone

F2 Frequent to permanent exposure in the hazardous zone

Possibility of avoidingthe hazardous event.

P1 Possible under certain conditions

P2 Almost impossible

Probability of the unwantedoccurrence.

W1A very slight probability that the unwanted occurrenceswill come to pass and only a few unwanted occurrences are likely

W2A slight probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and few unwanted occurrences are likely

W3A relatively high probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and frequent unwanted occurrences are likely

Page 37: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 75

Risk Graph - Example

Door Closing System – Inadvertent Operation

C1

C2

F2

P1

P2

P1

P2

F1

F2

C3

C4

F1

1

2

3

4

5

6 7

6

5

4

3

2

1

7

8

6

5

4

3

2

1

W3 W2 W1 Risk parameter Classification

Consequence(Severity)

C1 Minor injury

C2Serious permanent injury to one or more persons;death to one person

C3 Death to several peopleC4 Very many people killed

Frequency of, andexposure time in, the hazardous zone.

F1 Rare to more often exposure in the hazardous zone

F2 Frequent to permanent exposure in the hazardous zone

Possibility of avoidingthe hazardous event.

P1 Possible under certain conditions

P2 Almost impossible

Probability of the unwantedoccurrence.

W1A very slight probability that the unwanted occurrenceswill come to pass and only a few unwanted occurrences are likely

W2A slight probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and few unwanted occurrences are likely

W3A relatively high probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and frequent unwanted occurrences are likely

Page 38: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 76

Risk Graph - Example

Door Closing System – Inadvertent Operation

C1

C2

F2

P1

P2

P1

P2

F1

F2

C3

C4

F1

1

2

3

4

5

6 7

6

5

4

3

2

1

7

8

6

5

4

3

2

1

W3 W2 W1 Risk parameter Classification

Consequence(Severity)

C1 Minor injury

C2Serious permanent injury to one or more persons;death to one person

C3 Death to several peopleC4 Very many people killed

Frequency of, andexposure time in, the hazardous zone.

F1 Rare to more often exposure in the hazardous zone

F2 Frequent to permanent exposure in the hazardous zone

Possibility of avoidingthe hazardous event.

P1 Possible under certain conditions

P2 Almost impossible

Probability of the unwantedoccurrence.

W1A very slight probability that the unwanted occurrenceswill come to pass and only a few unwanted occurrences are likely

W2A slight probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and few unwanted occurrences are likely

W3A relatively high probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and frequent unwanted occurrences are likely

Page 39: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 77

Risk Graph - Example

Door Closing System – Inadvertent Operation

C1

C2

F2

P1

P2

P1

P2

F1

F2

C3

C4

F1

1

2

3

4

5

6 7

6

5

4

3

2

1

7

8

6

5

4

3

2

1

W3 W2 W1 Risk parameter Classification

Consequence(Severity)

C1 Minor injury

C2Serious permanent injury to one or more persons;death to one person

C3 Death to several peopleC4 Very many people killed

Frequency of, andexposure time in, the hazardous zone.

F1 Rare to more often exposure in the hazardous zone

F2 Frequent to permanent exposure in the hazardous zone

Possibility of avoidingthe hazardous event.

P1 Possible under certain conditions

P2 Almost impossible

Probability of the unwantedoccurrence.

W1A very slight probability that the unwanted occurrenceswill come to pass and only a few unwanted occurrences are likely

W2A slight probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and few unwanted occurrences are likely

W3A relatively high probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and frequent unwanted occurrences are likely

Page 40: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 78

Risk Graph - Example

Door Closing System – Inadvertent Operation

C1

C2

F2

P1

P2

P1

P2

F1

F2

C3

C4

F1

1

2

3

4

5

6 7

6

5

4

3

2

1

7

8

6

5

4

3

2

1

W3 W2 W1 Risk parameter Classification

Consequence(Severity)

C1 Minor injury

C2Serious permanent injury to one or more persons;death to one person

C3 Death to several peopleC4 Very many people killed

Frequency of, andexposure time in, the hazardous zone.

F1 Rare to more often exposure in the hazardous zone

F2 Frequent to permanent exposure in the hazardous zone

Possibility of avoidingthe hazardous event.

P1 Possible under certain conditions

P2 Almost impossible

Probability of the unwantedoccurrence.

W1A very slight probability that the unwanted occurrenceswill come to pass and only a few unwanted occurrences are likely

W2A slight probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and few unwanted occurrences are likely

W3A relatively high probability that the unwanted occurrences will come to pass and frequent unwanted occurrences are likely

Page 41: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 79

Example – Vehicle Industry

• the car is stopped on a ramp:

• hill start assist is not working:

• red light, in a ramp,

• parking on a slope,

• etc…

Page 42: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 80

Severity, Frequency

• S0: no injuries,

• S1: light to moderate injuries,

• S2: severe to life-threatening (survival

probable) injuries,

• S3: life-threatening (survival uncertain) to

fatal injuries.

• E0: incredibly unlikely,

• E1: not specified, more, than once a

year,

• E2: <1% of average operating time,

sometimes in a year,

• E3: 1% to 10% of average operating

time, sometimes in a month,

• E4: >10% of average operating time

(often).

Page 43: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 81

Severity, Frequency

• S0: no injuries,

• S1: light to moderate injuries,

• S2: severe to life-threatening (survival

probable) injuries,

• S3: life-threatening (survival uncertain) to

fatal injuries.

• E0: incredibly unlikely,

• E1: not specified, more, than once a

year,

• E2: <1% of average operating time,

sometimes in a year,

• E3: 1% to 10% of average operating

time, sometimes in a month,

• E4: >10% of average operating time

(often).

Page 44: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 82

Severity, Frequency

• S0: no injuries,

• S1: light to moderate injuries,

• S2: severe to life-threatening (survival

probable) injuries,

• S3: life-threatening (survival uncertain) to

fatal injuries.

• E0: incredibly unlikely,

• E1: not specified, more, than once a

year,

• E2: <1% of average operating time,

sometimes in a year,

• E3: 1% to 10% of average operating

time, sometimes in a month,

• E4: >10% of average operating time

(often).

Page 45: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 83

Controllability

• C0: controllable in general,

• C1: 99% or more of all drivers or other traffic participants are usually able to avoid

harm,

• C2: 90% or more of all drivers or other traffic participants are usually able to avoid

harm,

• C3: less than 90% of all drivers or other traffic participants are usually able, or barely

able to avoid harm.

Page 46: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 84

Controllability

• C0: controllable in general,

• C1: 99% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C2: 90% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C3: less than 90% of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able, or barely able to avoid harm.

• Question:

• Is there a driver in the car?

Page 47: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 85

Controllability

• With a driver:

• C0: controllable in general,

• C1: 99% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C2: 90% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C3: less than 90% of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able, or barely able to avoid harm.

• Without a driver:

• C0: controllable in general,

• C1: 99% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C2: 90% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C3: less than 90% of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able, or barely able to avoid harm.

Page 48: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 86

Controllability

• With a driver:

• C0: controllable in general,

• C1: 99% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C2: 90% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C3: less than 90% of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able, or barely able to avoid harm.

• Without a driver:

• C0: controllable in general,

• C1: 99% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C2: 90% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C3: less than 90% of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able, or barely able to avoid harm.

Page 49: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 87

Controllability

• With a driver:

• C0: controllable in general,

• C1: 99% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C2: 90% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C3: less than 90% of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able, or barely able to avoid harm.

• Without a driver:

• C0: controllable in general,

• C1: 99% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C2: 90% or more of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able to avoid harm,

• C3: less than 90% of all drivers or

other traffic participants are usually

able, or barely able to avoid harm.

Page 50: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 88

Classification

Page 51: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 89

Classification

Page 52: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 90

Classification

Page 53: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 91

Classification

without

driver

with driver

Page 54: DETERMINATION OF RISK, RISK CLASSIFICATION · 23/04/2018 The Acceptability of Risk 40 Safety Risk - Reminder •The significance of a hazardous effect in an application is called

End of Lecture 8.

Thank you for your attention!