determining centrality at phenix

17
11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 1 Determining Centrality Determining Centrality at PHENIX at PHENIX Ali Hanks Journal Club November 21, 2005

Upload: rodd

Post on 25-Feb-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Determining Centrality at PHENIX. Ali Hanks Journal Club November 21, 2005. Outline. Why is centrality important? The ZDC detector The BBC detector Glauber Model Negative Binomial Distrbution (NBD) Putting it all together. A few familiar examples. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 1

Determining Centrality at Determining Centrality at PHENIXPHENIX

Ali HanksJournal Club

November 21, 2005

Page 2: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 2

OutlineOutline

Why is centrality important?

The ZDC detector

The BBC detector

Glauber Model

Negative Binomial Distrbution (NBD)

Putting it all together

Page 3: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 3

A few familiar examplesA few familiar examples

Many things we measure depend on centrality RAA (Jaimin) ET and Nch => energy density

P.R. C71, 034908

Page 4: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 4

The ZDC detectorThe ZDC detector

Page 5: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 5

The BBC detectorThe BBC detector

beam pipe

Z-direction

R-d

irec

tion

Collision pointBBC

• inner ring

• middle ring

• outer ring

RING ID

BBC

Page 6: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 6

BBC charge sum is related to number of participant

It has also anti-correlation with ZDC energy sum.

Au+Au (Run4)d+Au (Run3)p+p (Run3)

participants

spectator go into ZDC

go into BBC

BBC Charge SumBBC Charge Sum

Page 7: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 7

The Glauber ModelThe Glauber Model Nucleons are distributed

according to a density function (e.g. Woods-Saxon)

Nucleons travel in straight lines and are not deflected as they pass through the other nucleus

Nucleons interact according to the inelastic cross section NN measured in pp collisions, even after interacting Participants – counts

nucleons which interact Binary collisions – counts

collisions

nucl-th/0112039;(Lectures in the theoretical physics, ed. W. E. Brittin, L. G. Dunham, Interscience, N. Y., 1959, v. 1, p. 315.)

Page 8: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 8

The Woods-Saxon density functionThe Woods-Saxon density function

Electron Scattering MeasurementsNucleus A R a w

C 12 2.47 0 0O 16 2.608 0.513 -0.051Al 27 3.07 0.519 0S 32 3.458 0.61 0Ca 40 3.76 0.586 -0.161Ni 58 4.309 0.516 -0.1308Cu 63 4.2 0.596 0W 186 6.51 0.535 0Au 197 6.38 0.535 0Pb 208 6.68 0.546 0U 238 6.68 0.6 0

H. DeVries, C.W. De Jager, C. DeVries, 1987

( ))/)exp((1

/1)(22

0

aRrRwrr

−++= ρρ ( ) ( )∫

+∞

∞−

= zssT AA ,rρ

Page 9: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 9

Some detailsSome detailsProbability of a nucleon-nucleon collision

occuring at impact parameter b

Probability of finding a nucleon at a certain b and z in the nucleus

Probability for a nucleon-nucleon collision occurring when nuclei A and B are at a relative impact parameter b

Probability of n collisions occuring

where

Page 10: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 10

NNpartpart & N & Ncollcoll from Glauber from Glauber

So the probability of having participants in nucleus A is:

the probability no nucleons collide =

and the average is:

So the total averages for a nucleus-nucleus collision at an impact parameter b are:

Page 11: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 11

What do we do?What do we do?

Monte-Carlo Glauber model (MCG) Generate events with range of

impact perameters using Glauber

Divide these events into centrality classes and get a table like this

How do we get back to real data? Remember the BBC count can be

related to Npart … but how?

Page 12: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 12

NBDNBD

The Negative Binomial Distribution (NBD) is given by: P(n,,k) = (n+k)/((k)n!)·(/k)n/(1+/k)n+k

where (/)2 = 1/k + 1/ give the width of the distribution Assuming Nhits~ Npart => ~ Npart Assuming all hits are uncorrelated => k ~ Npart

NBD distributions scaled with Glauber probabilities

Measured BBC count for fixed number of PC1 hits

Page 13: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 13

Fitting the BBC distributionFitting the BBC distribution

for Nhit 50 the trigger efficiency can assumed equal to 1 P(Nhit) = (Nhit)NpartNBD(Npart,,k)xMCG(Npart) Use fit to extract NBD parameters: and k Now we have a relationship between Npart and the actual Nnit in the BBC

Page 14: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 14

Trigger EfficiencyTrigger Efficiency

The last thing is to see how efficiently the BBC is tagging collisions Integrating this efficiency function gives the total trigger efficiency

~ 94% in Au-Au collisions

Page 15: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 15

Centrality BinsCentrality Bins

Each color corresponds to a centrality bin The bins are just percentage of

total area under the curve

This gives Nhit in the given bin Use the NBD/MCG fit to relate

this to <Npart> from the Glauber model

Can we do better? Recall that the efficiency get

low for very periferal events (low Nhit)

The ZDC can help us

Page 16: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 16

BBC vs ZDCBBC vs ZDC

Centrality bins are again determined as a function of the total geometric cross section

Relating these bins to Npart is a little tricky now Use detector response

simulations to match data and determine Npart

Similar to NBD but complicated by ZDC

0-5%

15-20%10-15%

0-5%

5-10%

Page 17: Determining Centrality at PHENIX

11/21/05 Ali Hanks - Journal Club 17

BibliographyBibliography

S.S. Adler et al, PRC 71, 034908 (2005) Analysis Note 210 Analysis Note 461 P. Shukla, nucl-th/0112039