dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86...

808
The University of Texas / Texas Tribune Poll Cross Tabulations The Texas Politics Project at The University of Texas at Austin in Conjunction with the Texas Tribune June 11, 2014

Upload: others

Post on 01-Aug-2020

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The University of Texas / Texas Tribune Poll Cross Tabulations

The Texas Politics Project at The University of Texas at Austin in Conjunction with the Texas Tribune

June 11, 2014

Page 2: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Contents

Political Habits 2Q2. Political Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Q3. Voting Habit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Texas Political Mood 25Q4. MIP Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25Q5. MIP State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61Q6. Obama Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98Q7. Congress Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110Q8. Rick Perry Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122Q9. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134Q10. National Economy: Better o↵/Worse O↵ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143Q11. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155Q12. Personal Economy: Better o↵/Worse o↵ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164

Elections 176Q13. 2014 Senate Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176Q14. 2014 Governor Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187Q15. 2014 Lieutenant Governor Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200Q16. 2014 Attorney General Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212Q17. 2014 Comptroller Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223Q18. 2014 Land Commissioner Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234Q19. 2014 Commissioner of Agriculture Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245Q20. 2014 Railroad Commission Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256Q21. 2014 Generic Texas Legislature Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267Q22. Tea Party Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276Q23. Tea Party Influence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286Q25. 2016 Republican Presidential Primary Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296Q26. 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315

Political Figure Favorability Ratings 328Q27. Ted Cruz Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328Q28. John Cornyn Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340Q29. David Alameel Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

1

Page 3: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q30. Rick Perry Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364Q31. Greg Abbott Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376Q32. Wendy Davis Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388Q33. Leticia Van de Putte Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400Q34. Dan Patrick Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412Q35A. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Public Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424Q35B. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433Q35C. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Immigration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442Q35D. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451Q35E. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460Q35F. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Ethics in Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469Q35G. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478Q35H. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Higher Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487

Policy Questions 496Q36A. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Creating a School Voucher Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496Q36B. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Expanding the Number of Charter Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 507Q36C. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing the Pay of Public School Teachers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518Q36D. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing Funding for the Public School System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529Q36E. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540Q36F. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 551Q36G. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing opportunities for online learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 562Q36H. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 573Q36I. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 584Q37. MOST E↵ective Education Policy Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 595Q38. Perceived Existence of Gender Gap in Pay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610Q39. State’s Role in Addressing Gender Equality in the Workplace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 620Q40. Death Penalty Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630Q41. Death Penalty Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 641Q42. Life Sustaining Treatment for Pregnant Women . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 650Q43. A↵ordable Care Act Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 658Q44. A↵ordable Care Act Preference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 670Q45. In-State Tuition for Illegal Immigrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 681Q46A. Agree/Disagree: Most immigrants pay their fair share of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 690Q46B. Agree/Disagree: We should restrict and control people coming to live in the U.S. more than we do now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 701Q46C. Agree/Disagree: Newcomers from other countries enrich Texas with their hard work and values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 712

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

2

Page 4: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46D. Agree/Disagree: Undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States should be deported immediately . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 723Q47A. Abortion Exceptions: The woman’s own health is seriously endangered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 734Q47B. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of rape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 743Q47C. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of incest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 752Q47D. Abortion Exceptions: There is a strong chance of a serious defect in the baby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 761Q47E. Abortion Exceptions: The family has very low income and cannot a↵ord any more children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 770Q47F. Abortion Exceptions: She is not married and does not want to marry the man . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 779Q47G. Abortion Exceptions: She is married and does not want any more children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 788Q48. College Education and Success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 797

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

3

Page 5: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political Habits

Q2. Political Interest

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 51 51 47 130 60 150 156 645

82.26 49.04 48.45 36.01 48.39 64.66 71.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 9 35 37 152 53 69 46 401

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

4

Page 6: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

14.52 33.65 38.14 42.11 42.74 29.74 21.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 1 14 12 41 8 11 11 98

1.61 13.46 12.37 11.36 6.45 4.74 5.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 1 4 1 34 3 2 4 49

1.61 3.85 1.03 9.42 2.42 0.86 1.83-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 6

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 97 361 124 232 219 1199

5.17 8.67 8.09 30.11 10.34 19.35 18.27===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 149 130 366 645

56.87 36.01 63.87---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 81 152 167 400

30.92 42.11 29.14---------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 27 41 29 97

10.31 11.36 5.06---------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 5 34 9 48

1.91 9.42 1.57---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

5

Page 7: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 0 4 2 60.00 1.11 0.35

---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 573 1196

21.91 30.18 47.91=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 145 33 66 34 89 57 201 625

56.64 29.20 55.46 30.09 73.55 46.34 67.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 85 60 39 46 24 44 82 380

33.20 53.10 32.77 40.71 19.83 35.77 27.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 12 12 11 27 7 13 12 94

4.69 10.62 9.24 23.89 5.79 10.57 4.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 12 7 3 5 1 9 2 39

4.69 6.19 2.52 4.42 0.83 7.32 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 5

0.78 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 113 121 123 298 1143

22.40 9.89 10.41 9.89 10.59 10.76 26.07================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

6

Page 8: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 244 34 348 626

49.80 30.09 64.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 184 46 149 379

37.55 40.71 27.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 36 27 32 95

7.35 23.89 5.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 23 5 12 40

4.69 4.42 2.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 1 2 6

0.61 0.88 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 490 113 543 1146

42.76 9.86 47.38=======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

7

Page 9: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Extremely interested 122 250 204 71 64750.62 54.95 76.69 29.83

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 83 165 57 95 400

34.44 36.26 21.43 39.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 28 26 4 41 99

11.62 5.71 1.50 17.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 8 11 1 27 47

3.32 2.42 0.38 11.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 0 4 7

0.00 0.66 0.00 1.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 266 238 1200

20.08 37.92 22.17 19.83===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 18 136 179 63 167 84 647

43.90 38.53 53.92 55.26 67.61 73.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 10 158 110 42 58 23 401

24.39 44.76 33.13 36.84 23.48 20.18----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 4 38 32 5 17 3 99

9.76 10.76 9.64 4.39 6.88 2.63

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

8

Page 10: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 7 20 8 4 4 4 47

17.07 5.67 2.41 3.51 1.62 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 1 3 0 1 0 7

4.88 0.28 0.90 0.00 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 247 114 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.49 20.57 9.49==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 112 141 66 151 172 642

59.57 53.21 50.00 53.55 52.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 56 85 49 105 105 400

29.79 32.08 37.12 37.23 31.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 10 25 11 20 33 99

5.32 9.43 8.33 7.09 10.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 9 13 4 5 18 49

4.79 4.91 3.03 1.77 5.47-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 1 2 1 1 6

0.53 0.38 1.52 0.35 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 282 329 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

9

Page 11: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.72 22.16 11.04 23.58 27.51=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 439 62 111 13 2 8 11 646

61.14 40.00 40.66 59.09 50.00 61.54 78.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 206 69 108 9 1 4 3 400

28.69 44.52 39.56 40.91 25.00 30.77 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 52 12 34 0 0 1 0 99

7.24 7.74 12.45 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 17 10 19 0 1 0 0 47

2.37 6.45 6.96 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7

0.56 1.29 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 273 22 4 13 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.77 1.83 0.33 1.08 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

10

Page 12: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 378 12 79 30 125 22 646

58.15 50.00 51.97 46.15 49.02 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 201 9 53 27 90 22 402

30.92 37.50 34.87 41.54 35.29 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 46 1 12 6 23 11 99

7.08 4.17 7.89 9.23 9.02 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 21 2 8 2 14 2 49

3.23 8.33 5.26 3.08 5.49 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 0 0 0 3 0 7

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 650 24 152 65 255 57 1203

54.03 2.00 12.64 5.40 21.20 4.74=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Extremely interested 347 300 647

61.74 46.95-----------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 176 225 401

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

11

Page 13: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

31.32 35.21-----------------------------------------------Not very interested 22 76 98

3.91 11.89-----------------------------------------------Not at all interested 14 34 48

2.49 5.32-----------------------------------------------Don't know 3 4 7

0.53 0.63-----------------------------------------------Total 562 639 1201

46.79 53.21===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 188 334 122 644

52.51 56.51 49.19---------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 124 184 92 400

34.64 31.13 37.10---------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 23 54 22 99

6.42 9.14 8.87---------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 20 17 11 48

5.59 2.88 4.44---------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

12

Page 14: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 3 2 1 60.84 0.34 0.40

---------------------------------------------------------Total 358 591 248 1197

29.91 49.37 20.72=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 136 212 61 62 175 646

54.18 57.45 50.00 57.94 49.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 93 108 50 29 121 401

37.05 29.27 40.98 27.10 34.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 16 33 5 9 35 98

6.37 8.94 4.10 8.41 9.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 5 14 6 7 16 48

1.99 3.79 4.92 6.54 4.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 2 0 0 4 7

0.40 0.54 0.00 0.00 1.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 369 122 107 351 1200

20.92 30.75 10.17 8.92 29.25============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

13

Page 15: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 91 143 285 128 647

45.96 45.54 61.82 56.39--------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 73 110 137 80 400

36.87 35.03 29.72 35.24--------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 21 42 21 14 98

10.61 13.38 4.56 6.17--------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 11 17 16 5 49

5.56 5.41 3.47 2.20--------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 2 2 0 6

1.01 0.64 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 227 1200

16.50 26.17 38.42 18.92==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

14

Page 16: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q3. Voting Habit

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 28 25 21 60 30 93 97 354

45.16 24.04 21.88 16.62 24.19 40.26 44.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 27 47 47 144 48 104 81 498

43.55 45.19 48.96 39.89 38.71 45.02 37.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

15

Page 17: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About half 3 15 11 48 23 17 18 1354.84 14.42 11.46 13.30 18.55 7.36 8.29

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 3 8 11 61 13 13 10 119

4.84 7.69 11.46 16.90 10.48 5.63 4.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 1 9 6 42 10 3 8 79

1.61 8.65 6.25 11.63 8.06 1.30 3.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 6 0 1 3 10

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 0.43 1.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 361 124 231 217 1195

5.19 8.70 8.03 30.21 10.38 19.33 18.16===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 73 60 219 352

27.97 16.62 38.35---------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 121 144 233 498

46.36 39.89 40.81---------------------------------------------------------------------About half 29 48 58 135

11.11 13.30 10.16---------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 22 61 36 119

8.43 16.90 6.30

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

16

Page 18: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------None 16 42 21 79

6.13 11.63 3.68---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 6 4 10

0.00 1.66 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 361 571 1193

21.88 30.26 47.86=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 88 16 19 18 44 36 123 344

34.65 14.16 15.83 15.93 36.67 29.03 41.55------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 108 42 59 44 56 43 130 482

42.52 37.17 49.17 38.94 46.67 34.68 43.92------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 26 18 20 15 10 18 23 130

10.24 15.93 16.67 13.27 8.33 14.52 7.77------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 20 28 10 19 7 17 11 112

7.87 24.78 8.33 16.81 5.83 13.71 3.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 9 9 11 15 2 9 9 64

3.54 7.96 9.17 13.27 1.67 7.26 3.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 0 1 2 1 1 0 8

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

17

Page 19: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.18 0.00 0.83 1.77 0.83 0.81 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 120 113 120 124 296 1140

22.28 9.91 10.53 9.91 10.53 10.88 25.96================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 123 18 203 344

25.31 15.93 37.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 210 44 230 484

43.21 38.94 42.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------About half 64 15 52 131

13.17 13.27 9.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 57 19 35 111

11.73 16.81 6.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------None 28 15 21 64

5.76 13.27 3.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 2 2 8

0.82 1.77 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 543 1142

42.56 9.89 47.55=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

18

Page 20: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 82 116 115 39 352

34.17 25.61 43.07 16.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 92 206 116 86 500

38.33 45.47 43.45 35.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 30 60 17 29 136

12.50 13.25 6.37 12.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 20 51 15 35 121

8.33 11.26 5.62 14.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 16 17 3 44 80

6.67 3.75 1.12 18.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 1 6 10

0.00 0.66 0.37 2.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 267 239 1199

20.02 37.78 22.27 19.93===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

19

Page 21: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 5 88 90 35 89 45 352

12.50 25.00 27.19 31.25 36.03 39.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 18 133 142 42 115 49 499

45.00 37.78 42.90 37.50 46.56 42.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 4 45 38 17 21 10 135

10.00 12.78 11.48 15.18 8.50 8.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 4 43 37 13 16 8 121

10.00 12.22 11.18 11.61 6.48 6.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 8 41 18 5 4 3 79

20.00 11.65 5.44 4.46 1.62 2.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 2 6 0 2 0 11

2.50 0.57 1.81 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 112 247 115 1197

3.34 29.41 27.65 9.36 20.63 9.61==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

20

Page 22: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Every election 70 94 40 64 84 35237.43 35.61 30.30 22.86 25.69

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 70 118 53 122 132 495

37.43 44.70 40.15 43.57 40.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 18 21 20 42 34 135

9.63 7.95 15.15 15.00 10.40-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 19 14 15 31 41 120

10.16 5.30 11.36 11.07 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 10 16 3 19 31 79

5.35 6.06 2.27 6.79 9.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 1 1 2 5 9

0.00 0.38 0.76 0.71 1.53-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 132 280 327 1190

15.71 22.18 11.09 23.53 27.48=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 233 39 61 3 3 4 10 353

32.50 25.49 22.43 13.64 75.00 28.57 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 319 60 96 15 0 6 4 500

44.49 39.22 35.29 68.18 0.00 42.86 28.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

21

Page 23: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 74 19 37 3 0 1 0 134

10.32 12.42 13.60 13.64 0.00 7.14 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 57 20 40 1 0 2 0 120

7.95 13.07 14.71 4.55 0.00 14.29 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 27 12 38 0 1 1 0 79

3.77 7.84 13.97 0.00 25.00 7.14 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10

0.98 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 153 272 22 4 14 14 1196

59.95 12.79 22.74 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 213 2 30 22 77 8 352

32.82 8.33 19.87 33.85 30.43 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 281 11 69 33 84 22 500

43.30 45.83 45.70 50.77 33.20 37.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 71 1 20 4 34 7 137

10.94 4.17 13.25 6.15 13.44 12.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 52 8 21 3 27 10 121

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

22

Page 24: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

8.01 33.33 13.91 4.62 10.67 17.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 29 1 10 3 27 10 80

4.47 4.17 6.62 4.62 10.67 17.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 1 1 0 4 1 10

0.46 4.17 0.66 0.00 1.58 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 65 253 58 1200

54.08 2.00 12.58 5.42 21.08 4.83=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Every election 192 161 353

34.22 25.31-----------------------------------------------Almost every election 244 255 499

43.49 40.09-----------------------------------------------About half 57 79 136

10.16 12.42-----------------------------------------------One or two 37 83 120

6.60 13.05-----------------------------------------------None 25 54 79

4.46 8.49-----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

23

Page 25: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 4 101.07 0.63

-----------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Every election 98 176 79 353

27.37 29.98 31.85---------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 145 254 99 498

40.50 43.27 39.92---------------------------------------------------------About half 41 67 27 135

11.45 11.41 10.89---------------------------------------------------------One or two 45 50 25 120

12.57 8.52 10.08---------------------------------------------------------None 25 36 16 77

6.98 6.13 6.45---------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 2 10

1.12 0.68 0.81---------------------------------------------------------Total 358 587 248 1193

30.01 49.20 20.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

24

Page 26: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 76 101 39 40 97 353

30.28 27.45 31.97 37.04 27.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 122 148 47 39 143 499

48.61 40.22 38.52 36.11 40.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 20 52 10 8 46 136

7.97 14.13 8.20 7.41 13.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 24 35 13 13 36 121

9.56 9.51 10.66 12.04 10.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 9 29 13 8 21 80

3.59 7.88 10.66 7.41 6.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 0 0 7 10

0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 2.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 350 1199

20.93 30.69 10.18 9.01 29.19============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

25

Page 27: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Every election 42 81 137 93 353

21.32 25.80 29.72 41.15--------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 70 110 216 103 499

35.53 35.03 46.85 45.58--------------------------------------------------------------About half 25 44 57 11 137

12.69 14.01 12.36 4.87--------------------------------------------------------------One or two 29 44 35 12 120

14.72 14.01 7.59 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------None 27 31 14 7 79

13.71 9.87 3.04 3.10--------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 2 0 10

2.03 1.27 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 226 1198

16.44 26.21 38.48 18.86==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

26

Page 28: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Texas Political Mood

Q4. MIP Country

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 10 17 12 77 24 33 37 210

15.87 15.89 12.50 21.45 19.67 14.29 17.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 0 3 5 31 25 53 50 167

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

27

Page 29: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 2.80 5.21 8.64 20.49 22.94 23.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadershi 3 5 11 32 25 41 41 158

4.76 4.67 11.46 8.91 20.49 17.75 18.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 7 9 8 44 3 11 4 86

11.11 8.41 8.33 12.26 2.46 4.76 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 2 6 6 32 3 7 10 66

3.17 5.61 6.25 8.91 2.46 3.03 4.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 6 14 11 11 2 2 0 46

9.52 13.08 11.46 3.06 1.64 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 10 21 20 11 5 0 0 67

15.87 19.63 20.83 3.06 4.10 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 0 0 15 9 24 22 71

1.59 0.00 0.00 4.18 7.38 10.39 10.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 0 5 7 6 2 3 1 24

0.00 4.67 7.29 1.67 1.64 1.30 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 0 2 11 1 8 1 24

1.59 0.00 2.08 3.06 0.82 3.46 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 1 5 0 6 9 9 9 39

1.59 4.67 0.00 1.67 7.38 3.90 4.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 0 0 12 3 4 4 23

0.00 0.00 0.00 3.34 2.46 1.73 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 2 3 5 12 1 10 1 34

3.17 2.80 5.21 3.34 0.82 4.33 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

28

Page 30: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.93 2.08 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 2 0 5 0 7 4 23

7.94 1.87 0.00 1.39 0.00 3.03 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 6 2 6 0 0 1 24

14.29 5.61 2.08 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.43 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 0 0 2 0 8 15 27

3.17 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 3.46 6.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 4 4 12 2 0 0 22

0.00 3.74 4.17 3.34 1.64 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 5

1.59 0.93 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 0 1 0 11 4 4 4 24

0.00 0.93 0.00 3.06 3.28 1.73 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 0 1 1 14 3 3 6 28

0.00 0.93 1.04 3.90 2.46 1.30 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 0 0 3 1 2 4 10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.82 0.87 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

29

Page 31: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3

0.00 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 107 96 359 122 231 216 1194

5.28 8.96 8.04 30.07 10.22 19.35 18.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 39 77 94 210

14.77 21.45 16.52---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 8 31 127 166

3.03 8.64 22.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 19 32 107 158

7.20 8.91 18.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 24 44 18 86

9.09 12.26 3.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 13 32 20 65

4.92 8.91 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

30

Page 32: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Partisan gridlock 30 11 3 4411.36 3.06 0.53

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 51 11 5 67

19.32 3.06 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 15 56 72

0.38 4.18 9.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 6 6 24

4.55 1.67 1.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 3 11 10 24

1.14 3.06 1.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 6 6 28 40

2.27 1.67 4.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 12 12 24

0.00 3.34 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 9 12 12 33

3.41 3.34 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

1.14 0.28 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 7 5 11 23

2.65 1.39 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 17 6 1 24

6.44 1.67 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 2 2 4

0.00 0.56 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

31

Page 33: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Housing 1 0 1 20.38 0.00 0.18

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 2 23 27

0.76 0.56 4.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 12 2 23

3.41 3.34 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 2 1 5

0.76 0.56 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 1 11 12 24

0.38 3.06 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 2 14 11 27

0.76 3.90 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 3 7 10

0.00 0.84 1.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 2

0.38 0.28 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 1

0.38 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

1.14 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 359 569 1192

22.15 30.12 47.73=================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

32

Page 34: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 45 13 19 25 19 25 54 200

17.58 11.40 15.97 22.12 15.70 20.16 18.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 10 4 4 17 31 25 66 157

3.91 3.51 3.36 15.04 25.62 20.16 22.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 7 23 16 29 20 54 159

3.91 6.14 19.33 14.16 23.97 16.13 18.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 36 10 6 12 4 7 10 85

14.06 8.77 5.04 10.62 3.31 5.65 3.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 15 10 6 4 2 9 12 58

5.86 8.77 5.04 3.54 1.65 7.26 4.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 14 10 13 3 0 2 2 44

5.47 8.77 10.92 2.65 0.00 1.61 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 35 12 15 2 1 1 0 66

13.67 10.53 12.61 1.77 0.83 0.81 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 6 2 4 13 7 34 69

1.17 5.26 1.68 3.54 10.74 5.65 11.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 8 7 3 0 0 3 2 23

3.12 6.14 2.52 0.00 0.00 2.42 0.67

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

33

Page 35: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 4 3 2 3 2 3 5 22

1.56 2.63 1.68 2.65 1.65 2.42 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 7 4 1 3 8 6 9 38

2.73 3.51 0.84 2.65 6.61 4.84 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 4 3 0 2 2 4 7 22

1.56 2.63 0.00 1.77 1.65 3.23 2.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 8 4 4 5 3 2 7 33

3.12 3.51 3.36 4.42 2.48 1.61 2.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.88 1.68 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 9 2 1 5 1 2 4 24

3.52 1.75 0.84 4.42 0.83 1.61 1.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 1 6 4 1 0 0 23

4.30 0.88 5.04 3.54 0.83 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 5

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 1.61 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 0 1 2 1 3 1 18 26

0.00 0.88 1.68 0.88 2.48 0.81 6.06------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 14 4 3 0 0 0 0 21

5.47 3.51 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 6

0.78 0.88 1.68 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

34

Page 36: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 4 5 5 1 0 3 6 24

1.56 4.39 4.20 0.88 0.00 2.42 2.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 4 0 2 1 0 3 19

3.52 3.51 0.00 1.77 0.83 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 0 2 0 2 3 8

0.39 0.00 0.00 1.77 0.00 1.61 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 119 113 121 124 297 1144

22.38 9.97 10.40 9.88 10.58 10.84 25.96============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 76 25 98 199

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

35

Page 37: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.57 22.12 18.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 18 17 122 157

3.69 15.04 22.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 40 16 103 159

8.20 14.16 19.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 51 12 20 83

10.45 10.62 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 31 4 23 58

6.35 3.54 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 37 3 3 43

7.58 2.65 0.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 62 2 2 66

12.70 1.77 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 11 4 54 69

2.25 3.54 10.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 18 0 5 23

3.69 0.00 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 10 3 9 22

2.05 2.65 1.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 12 3 23 38

2.46 2.65 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 7 2 14 23

1.43 1.77 2.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 16 5 12 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

36

Page 38: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.28 4.42 2.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

0.61 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 11 5 6 22

2.25 4.42 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 18 4 1 23

3.69 3.54 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 0 4 5

0.20 0.00 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 2

0.41 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 4 1 23 28

0.82 0.88 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 22 0 0 22

4.51 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 4 1 0 5

0.82 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 1 9 24

2.87 0.88 1.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 13 2 4 19

2.66 1.77 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 5 8

0.20 1.77 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 2 0 0 2

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

37

Page 39: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.41 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 1

0.20 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

0.61 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 540 1141

42.77 9.90 47.33===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 55 68 43 44 210

22.82 15.08 16.23 18.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 49 13 71 32 165

20.33 2.88 26.79 13.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 24 40 66 30 160

9.96 8.87 24.91 12.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 10 48 5 23 86

4.15 10.64 1.89 9.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

38

Page 40: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Health care 14 38 5 8 655.81 8.43 1.89 3.40

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 3 38 0 4 45

1.24 8.43 0.00 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 1 61 0 4 66

0.41 13.53 0.00 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 12 7 24 28 71

4.98 1.55 9.06 11.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 17 0 1 24

2.49 3.77 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 8 5 5 23

2.07 1.77 1.89 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 10 9 12 8 39

4.15 2.00 4.53 3.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 8 6 6 5 25

3.32 1.33 2.26 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 8 16 4 5 33

3.32 3.55 1.51 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 2 0 1 4

0.41 0.44 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 9 9 2 4 24

3.73 2.00 0.75 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 17 3 3 23

0.00 3.77 1.13 1.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

39

Page 41: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 3 0 1 1 51.24 0.00 0.38 0.43

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 2 0 0 2

0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 8 3 12 4 27

3.32 0.67 4.53 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 20 0 3 23

0.00 4.43 0.00 1.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 4 0 0 5

0.41 0.89 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 8 2 7 24

2.90 1.77 0.75 2.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 11 0 10 26

2.07 2.44 0.00 4.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 1 4 4 11

0.83 0.22 1.51 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 0 1 2

0.00 0.22 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 1 0 0 1

0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 0 0 3

0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

40

Page 42: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 241 451 265 235 119220.22 37.84 22.23 19.71

===========================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 3 63 66 19 42 17 210

6.98 17.80 20.31 16.52 16.94 14.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 4 52 48 16 27 19 166

9.30 14.69 14.77 13.91 10.89 16.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 6 48 37 15 32 22 160

13.95 13.56 11.38 13.04 12.90 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 3 30 23 4 15 11 86

6.98 8.47 7.08 3.48 6.05 9.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 3 21 20 7 13 0 64

6.98 5.93 6.15 6.09 5.24 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 1 6 14 6 8 11 46

2.33 1.69 4.31 5.22 3.23 9.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 0 9 16 3 29 9 66

0.00 2.54 4.92 2.61 11.69 7.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 2 18 22 4 20 5 71

4.65 5.08 6.77 3.48 8.06 4.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

41

Page 43: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 0 4 7 3 7 3 24

0.00 1.13 2.15 2.61 2.82 2.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 10 3 0 6 4 24

2.33 2.82 0.92 0.00 2.42 3.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 2 13 6 7 11 1 40

4.65 3.67 1.85 6.09 4.44 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 3 7 0 8 5 25

4.65 0.85 2.15 0.00 3.23 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 0 15 15 4 0 0 34

0.00 4.24 4.62 3.48 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 1 0 0 2 0 4

2.33 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 0 12 6 4 2 0 24

0.00 3.39 1.85 3.48 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 5 5 4 5 5 24

0.00 1.41 1.54 3.48 2.02 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 1 2 0 2 0 5

0.00 0.28 0.62 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

2.33 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 10 6 6 3 1 28

4.65 2.82 1.85 5.22 1.21 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 7 3 4 5 0 23

9.30 1.98 0.92 3.48 2.02 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

42

Page 44: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 0 2 2 1 0 5

0.00 0.00 0.62 1.74 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 11 7 3 1 0 24

4.65 3.11 2.15 2.61 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 3 12 7 2 3 1 28

6.98 3.39 2.15 1.74 1.21 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 3 2 1 1 4 0 11

6.98 0.56 0.31 0.87 1.61 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.28 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 1 0 1 1 3

0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.40 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 43 354 325 115 248 115 1200

3.58 29.50 27.08 9.58 20.67 9.58======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

43

Page 45: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 30 40 22 58 55 205

16.39 15.15 16.67 20.64 16.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 34 40 19 37 36 166

18.58 15.15 14.39 13.17 10.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 20 34 18 36 52 160

10.93 12.88 13.64 12.81 15.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 5 26 7 26 24 88

2.73 9.85 5.30 9.25 7.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 4 12 14 17 18 65

2.19 4.55 10.61 6.05 5.49-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 1 3 3 20 19 46

0.55 1.14 2.27 7.12 5.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 4 7 7 21 28 67

2.19 2.65 5.30 7.47 8.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 30 20 10 4 7 71

16.39 7.58 7.58 1.42 2.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 5 0 4 7 8 24

2.73 0.00 3.03 2.49 2.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 2 12 1 6 3 24

1.09 4.55 0.76 2.14 0.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 8 9 3 9 9 38

4.37 3.41 2.27 3.20 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 7 3 2 9 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

44

Page 46: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.09 2.65 2.27 0.71 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 6 8 6 4 9 33

3.28 3.03 4.55 1.42 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 0 2 1 4

0.00 0.38 0.00 0.71 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 10 1 1 6 23

2.73 3.79 0.76 0.36 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 1 5 0 3 14 23

0.55 1.89 0.00 1.07 4.27-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 2 2 0 1 5

0.00 0.76 1.52 0.00 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 0 1 0 2

0.00 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 6 7 0 5 9 27

3.28 2.65 0.00 1.78 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 3 5 7 6 23

1.09 1.14 3.79 2.49 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 1 0 1 1 5

1.09 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 5 5 3 5 5 23

2.73 1.89 2.27 1.78 1.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 8 4 8 2 27

2.73 3.03 3.03 2.85 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 6 3 0 1 0 10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

45

Page 47: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.28 1.14 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 0 0 0 2 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 0 0 3 3

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 183 264 132 281 328 1188

15.40 22.22 11.11 23.65 27.61=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 111 30 61 1 0 5 1 209

15.50 19.74 22.43 4.55 0.00 41.67 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 115 8 34 2 2 1 3 165

16.06 5.26 12.50 9.09 66.67 8.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 119 8 23 3 0 3 5 161

16.62 5.26 8.46 13.64 0.00 25.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

46

Page 48: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 36 20 19 8 0 0 3 865.03 13.16 6.99 36.36 0.00 0.00 21.43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 31 14 19 0 0 1 0 65

4.33 9.21 6.99 0.00 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 33 3 7 2 0 0 0 45

4.61 1.97 2.57 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 42 5 19 1 0 0 0 67

5.87 3.29 6.99 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 53 6 10 0 0 0 1 70

7.40 3.95 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 10 6 7 1 0 0 0 24

1.40 3.95 2.57 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 14 2 7 0 0 0 0 23

1.96 1.32 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 24 7 7 1 0 1 0 40

3.35 4.61 2.57 4.55 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 6 5 0 0 0 0 25

1.96 3.95 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 16 4 13 0 0 0 0 33

2.23 2.63 4.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4

0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 11 6 5 0 1 0 0 23

1.54 3.95 1.84 0.00 33.33 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

47

Page 49: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Environment 16 0 8 0 0 0 0 242.23 0.00 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 5

0.56 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.66 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 24 0 3 0 0 0 0 27

3.35 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 11 8 4 0 0 0 0 23

1.54 5.26 1.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 5

0.14 1.32 0.37 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 12 5 6 0 0 0 0 23

1.68 3.29 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 4 9 12 1 0 0 0 26

0.56 5.92 4.41 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 10

1.12 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.66 0.00 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

48

Page 50: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Voting system 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 152 272 22 3 12 14 1191

60.12 12.76 22.84 1.85 0.25 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 112 3 24 10 45 16 210

17.36 13.64 15.79 14.71 17.86 27.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 103 6 19 9 28 1 166

15.97 27.27 12.50 13.24 11.11 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 86 3 25 8 33 3 158

13.33 13.64 16.45 11.76 13.10 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 38 1 5 9 26 8 87

5.89 4.55 3.29 13.24 10.32 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 38 1 10 1 13 3 66

5.89 4.55 6.58 1.47 5.16 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 22 0 11 2 8 2 45

3.41 0.00 7.24 2.94 3.17 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 28 0 14 3 14 7 66

4.34 0.00 9.21 4.41 5.56 12.07

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

49

Page 51: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 43 0 6 7 9 6 71

6.67 0.00 3.95 10.29 3.57 10.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 1 3 0 8 1 25

1.86 4.55 1.97 0.00 3.17 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 18 1 1 1 3 0 24

2.79 4.55 0.66 1.47 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 26 1 3 5 4 1 40

4.03 4.55 1.97 7.35 1.59 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 2 0 0 4 4 24

2.17 9.09 0.00 0.00 1.59 6.90---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 15 1 3 2 11 2 34

2.33 4.55 1.97 2.94 4.37 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 0 0 1 2 0 4

0.16 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.79 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 7 1 10 2 24

0.47 4.55 4.61 1.47 3.97 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 13 0 4 0 6 0 23

2.02 0.00 2.63 0.00 2.38 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 3 0 0 0 1 0 4

0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 0 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.00 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 22 0 3 3 0 0 28

3.41 0.00 1.97 4.41 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

50

Page 52: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 10 0 7 1 4 0 22

1.55 0.00 4.61 1.47 1.59 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 0 2 0 0 0 5

0.47 0.00 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 0 5 2 9 1 24

1.09 0.00 3.29 2.94 3.57 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 18 0 0 1 9 0 28

2.79 0.00 0.00 1.47 3.57 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 6 1 0 1 3 0 11

0.93 4.55 0.00 1.47 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 2 0 0 0 1 0 3

0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 22 152 68 252 58 1197

53.88 1.84 12.70 5.68 21.05 4.85=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

51

Page 53: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------The economy 97 113 210

17.38 17.80-----------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 90 76 166

16.13 11.97-----------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 76 84 160

13.62 13.23-----------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 40 46 86

7.17 7.24-----------------------------------------------------------Health care 23 42 65

4.12 6.61-----------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 22 23 45

3.94 3.62-----------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 36 31 67

6.45 4.88-----------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 31 40 71

5.56 6.30-----------------------------------------------------------Education 7 18 25

1.25 2.83-----------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 7 16 23

1.25 2.52-----------------------------------------------------------Immigration 18 21 39

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

52

Page 54: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.23 3.31-----------------------------------------------------------Taxes 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 13 21 34

2.33 3.31-----------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 4

0.54 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 17 6 23

3.05 0.94-----------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------The media 3 2 5

0.54 0.31-----------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 2 2

0.00 0.31-----------------------------------------------------------Border security 16 11 27

2.87 1.73-----------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 15 22

1.25 2.36-----------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 1 4

0.54 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 17 27

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

53

Page 55: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.79 2.68-----------------------------------------------------------Abortion 4 6 10

0.72 0.94-----------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 2

0.18 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0

0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 1

0.18 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 3

0.00 0.47-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 635 1193

46.77 53.23===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 65 112 33 210

18.21 19.02 13.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 42 87 36 165

11.76 14.77 14.40---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

54

Page 56: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political corruption/leadership 38 80 42 16010.64 13.58 16.80

---------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 24 51 12 87

6.72 8.66 4.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 28 22 15 65

7.84 3.74 6.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 15 28 2 45

4.20 4.75 0.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 28 34 4 66

7.84 5.77 1.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 17 27 27 71

4.76 4.58 10.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 16 3 25

1.68 2.72 1.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 4 11 9 24

1.12 1.87 3.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 9 12 19 40

2.52 2.04 7.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 5 17 3 25

1.40 2.89 1.20---------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 12 13 8 33

3.36 2.21 3.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

0.84 0.17 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

55

Page 57: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Gay marriage 9 9 5 232.52 1.53 2.00

---------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 7 14 2 23

1.96 2.38 0.80---------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 3 1 5

0.28 0.51 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 2

0.56 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 15 9 27

0.84 2.55 3.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 10 8 5 23

2.80 1.36 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 1 1 5

0.84 0.17 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 11 8 5 24

3.08 1.36 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 13 5 27

2.52 2.21 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 5 4 11

0.56 0.85 1.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 2

0.28 0.17 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

56

Page 58: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Foreign trade 0 1 0 10.00 0.17 0.00

---------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

0.84 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 250 1196

29.85 49.25 20.90=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 44 60 25 16 65 210

17.46 16.35 21.01 14.95 18.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 38 49 19 10 50 166

15.08 13.35 15.97 9.35 14.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 33 43 14 16 53 159

13.10 11.72 11.76 14.95 15.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 19 31 7 8 22 87

7.54 8.45 5.88 7.48 6.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 16 16 8 7 19 66

6.35 4.36 6.72 6.54 5.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 15 14 4 9 4 46

5.95 3.81 3.36 8.41 1.15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

57

Page 59: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 14 24 5 11 12 66

5.56 6.54 4.20 10.28 3.45----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 10 17 4 2 38 71

3.97 4.63 3.36 1.87 10.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 11 0 2 5 24

2.38 3.00 0.00 1.87 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 7 2 0 9 23

1.98 1.91 1.68 0.00 2.59----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 7 12 3 8 10 40

2.78 3.27 2.52 7.48 2.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 10 6 1 0 7 24

3.97 1.63 0.84 0.00 2.01----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 4 10 6 0 14 34

1.59 2.72 5.04 0.00 4.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 0 1 0 2 4

0.40 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 2 11 1 3 5 22

0.79 3.00 0.84 2.80 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 6 8 1 6 1 22

2.38 2.18 0.84 5.61 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 3 1 0 1 5

0.00 0.82 0.84 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

58

Page 60: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 5 11 5 0 6 27

1.98 3.00 4.20 0.00 1.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 5 3 4 7 23

1.59 1.36 2.52 3.74 2.01----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 2 1 0 2 5

0.00 0.54 0.84 0.00 0.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 8 4 2 3 24

2.78 2.18 3.36 1.87 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 14 3 0 5 27

1.98 3.81 2.52 0.00 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 3 0 1 5 10

0.40 0.82 0.00 0.93 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 1 0 0 2

0.00 0.27 0.84 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 1 0 1 1 3

0.00 0.27 0.00 0.93 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 367 119 107 348 1193

21.12 30.76 9.97 8.97 29.17========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

59

Page 61: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 36 71 78 25 210

18.85 22.68 16.88 10.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 13 38 68 47 166

6.81 12.14 14.72 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 14 40 66 40 160

7.33 12.78 14.29 17.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 18 20 35 14 87

9.42 6.39 7.58 6.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 11 23 22 9 65

5.76 7.35 4.76 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 3 9 27 7 46

1.57 2.88 5.84 3.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 12 16 30 8 66

6.28 5.11 6.49 3.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 12 17 24 19 72

6.28 5.43 5.19 8.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 10 9 0 25

3.14 3.19 1.95 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 3 4 7 9 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

60

Page 62: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.57 1.28 1.52 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 5 6 17 12 40

2.62 1.92 3.68 5.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 4 13 7 0 24

2.09 4.15 1.52 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 9 6 10 8 33

4.71 1.92 2.16 3.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 2 0 2 4

0.00 0.64 0.00 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 12 7 4 0 23

6.28 2.24 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 5 6 7 6 24

2.62 1.92 1.52 2.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 2 0 2 1 5

1.05 0.00 0.43 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 2 0 2

0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 4 11 9 27

1.57 1.28 2.38 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 1 3 13 5 22

0.52 0.96 2.81 2.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 2 2 0 4

0.00 0.64 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 8 6 8 2 24

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

61

Page 63: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.19 1.92 1.73 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 9 6 3 27

4.71 2.88 1.30 1.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 4 1 3 2 10

2.09 0.32 0.65 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 0 1 0 2

0.52 0.00 0.22 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 3 1 4

0.00 0.00 0.65 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 191 313 462 230 1196

15.97 26.17 38.63 19.23==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

62

Page 64: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q5. MIP State

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 3 5 5 39 25 61 42 180

4.69 4.90 5.10 10.92 20.66 26.64 19.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 2 1 21 19 58 72 176

4.69 1.96 1.02 5.88 15.70 25.33 33.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

63

Page 65: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 6 2 10 43 3 13 8 859.38 1.96 10.20 12.04 2.48 5.68 3.67

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadershi 13 30 30 34 4 4 3 118

20.31 29.41 30.61 9.52 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 4 13 10 19 5 6 3 60

6.25 12.75 10.20 5.32 4.13 2.62 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 3 10 2 25 13 10 2 65

4.69 9.80 2.04 7.00 10.74 4.37 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 5 14 2 25 2 4 4 56

7.81 13.73 2.04 7.00 1.65 1.75 1.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 7 3 8 30 16 17 11 92

10.94 2.94 8.16 8.40 13.22 7.42 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 4 1 19 4 4 3 37

3.12 3.92 1.02 5.32 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 0 0 6 1 12 21 41

1.56 0.00 0.00 1.68 0.83 5.24 9.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 3 1 7 2 9 7 30

1.56 2.94 1.02 1.96 1.65 3.93 3.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 5 4 4 2 0 0 16

1.56 4.90 4.08 1.12 1.65 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 3 1 1 14 3 0 0 22

4.69 0.98 1.02 3.92 2.48 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 0 1 5 16 6 4 11 43

0.00 0.98 5.10 4.48 4.96 1.75 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

64

Page 66: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State government spending 0 0 2 12 3 2 3 220.00 0.00 2.04 3.36 2.48 0.87 1.38

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 1 0 7 2 8 2 20

0.00 0.98 0.00 1.96 1.65 3.49 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 0 3 0 4 1 0 3 11

0.00 2.94 0.00 1.12 0.83 0.00 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 7

3.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.87 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 6 1 5 3 1 0 3 19

9.38 0.98 5.10 0.84 0.83 0.00 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 0 0 2 12 4 4 3 25

0.00 0.00 2.04 3.36 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 1.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 5

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 1.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 6

0.00 0.98 3.06 0.28 0.83 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 0 1 0 1 0 4 9 15

0.00 0.98 0.00 0.28 0.00 1.75 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 2 3 6 0 2 0 17

6.25 1.96 3.06 1.68 0.00 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

65

Page 67: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 70.00 0.00 1.02 0.56 0.00 1.31 0.46

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 7

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.83 0.44 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 64 102 98 357 121 229 218 1189

5.38 8.58 8.24 30.03 10.18 19.26 18.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 13 39 129 181

4.96 10.92 22.67---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 6 21 149 176

2.29 5.88 26.19---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 18 43 25 86

6.87 12.04 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 73 34 11 118

27.86 9.52 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 27 19 15 61

10.31 5.32 2.64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

66

Page 68: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 14 25 25 64

5.34 7.00 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 22 25 9 56

8.40 7.00 1.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 18 30 45 93

6.87 8.40 7.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 19 11 37

2.67 5.32 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 6 33 40

0.38 1.68 5.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 7 18 30

1.91 1.96 3.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 9 4 2 15

3.44 1.12 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 4 14 3 21

1.53 3.92 0.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 16 21 42

1.91 4.48 3.69---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 2 12 9 23

0.76 3.36 1.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 7 11 20

0.76 1.96 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 4 4 11

1.15 1.12 0.70

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

67

Page 69: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 5 7

0.76 0.00 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 12 3 4 19

4.58 0.84 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 2 12 10 24

0.76 3.36 1.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 2 3

0.38 0.00 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 1 3

0.38 0.28 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 4 5

0.00 0.28 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 4 1 1 6

1.53 0.28 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 1 1 13 15

0.38 0.28 2.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 6 2 17

3.44 1.68 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 2 4 7

0.38 0.56 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 5 2 7

0.00 1.40 0.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

68

Page 70: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 357 569 1188

22.05 30.05 47.90=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 11 13 7 16 39 25 65 176

4.33 11.40 5.83 14.16 31.97 20.49 21.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 7 3 3 14 39 24 84 174

2.76 2.63 2.50 12.39 31.97 19.67 28.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 37 11 4 10 2 5 10 79

14.57 9.65 3.33 8.85 1.64 4.10 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 34 15 49 5 7 2 2 114

13.39 13.16 40.83 4.42 5.74 1.64 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 22 10 7 4 2 8 7 60

8.66 8.77 5.83 3.54 1.64 6.56 2.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 11 5 7 8 2 13 13 59

4.33 4.39 5.83 7.08 1.64 10.66 4.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 29 7 4 6 3 2 3 54

11.42 6.14 3.33 5.31 2.46 1.64 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 12 9 13 14 14 12 17 91

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

69

Page 71: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.72 7.89 10.83 12.39 11.48 9.84 5.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 11 5 2 1 4 3 33

2.76 9.65 4.17 1.77 0.82 3.28 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 1 0 4 5 0 26 37

0.39 0.88 0.00 3.54 4.10 0.00 8.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 6 6 3 1 1 2 10 29

2.36 5.26 2.50 0.88 0.82 1.64 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 3 2 1 1 0 0 15

3.15 2.63 1.67 0.88 0.82 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 8 1 4 6 0 1 0 20

3.15 0.88 3.33 5.31 0.00 0.82 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 14 4 2 2 3 1 10 36

5.51 3.51 1.67 1.77 2.46 0.82 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 6 2 1 3 0 7 4 23

2.36 1.75 0.83 2.65 0.00 5.74 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 3 2 1 3 1 6 5 21

1.18 1.75 0.83 2.65 0.82 4.92 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 1 1 1 0 4 11

1.18 0.88 0.83 0.88 0.82 0.00 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 2 0 0 0 3 7

0.79 0.00 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 1 4 2 0 1 0 19

4.33 0.88 3.33 1.77 0.00 0.82 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 4 1 0 6 1 5 6 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

70

Page 72: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.57 0.88 0.00 5.31 0.82 4.10 2.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 4

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 0.83 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 5

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 6

1.57 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 14

1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 5 0 1 0 2 2 17

2.76 4.39 0.00 0.88 0.00 1.64 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 7

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 5

0.79 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 120 113 122 122 298 1143

22.22 9.97 10.50 9.89 10.67 10.67 26.07============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

71

Page 73: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 30 16 129 175

6.19 14.16 23.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 12 14 146 172

2.47 12.39 27.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 51 10 17 78

10.52 8.85 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 98 5 11 114

20.21 4.42 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 39 4 17 60

8.04 3.54 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 23 8 28 59

4.74 7.08 5.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 40 6 8 54

8.25 5.31 1.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 34 14 43 91

7.01 12.39 7.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 23 2 7 32

4.74 1.77 1.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 4 31 38

0.62 3.54 5.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

72

Page 74: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Social welfare programs 15 1 12 283.09 0.88 2.22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 13 1 1 15

2.68 0.88 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 13 6 1 20

2.68 5.31 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 20 2 14 36

4.12 1.77 2.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 3 11 23

1.86 2.65 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 5 3 12 20

1.03 2.65 2.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 1 5 10

0.82 0.88 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 0 3 7

0.82 0.00 0.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 17 2 1 20

3.51 1.77 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 5 6 13 24

1.03 5.31 2.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 0 2 4

0.41 0.00 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 1 3

0.21 0.88 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

73

Page 75: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Insurance rates 1 1 3 50.21 0.88 0.56

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 5 1 0 6

1.03 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 3 0 11 14

0.62 0.00 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 11 1 4 16

2.27 0.88 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 6 6

0.00 0.00 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 1 2 7

0.82 0.88 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 540 1138

42.62 9.93 47.45===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 42 26 84 30 182

17.50 5.74 31.34 13.10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

74

Page 76: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 35 11 86 44 176

14.58 2.43 32.09 19.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 21 43 3 19 86

8.75 9.49 1.12 8.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 1 100 7 10 118

0.42 22.08 2.61 4.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 8 42 7 4 61

3.33 9.27 2.61 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 20 22 5 18 65

8.33 4.86 1.87 7.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 6 38 1 11 56

2.50 8.39 0.37 4.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 20 33 22 19 94

8.33 7.28 8.21 8.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 5 17 2 13 37

2.08 3.75 0.75 5.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 9 2 13 16 40

3.75 0.44 4.85 6.99---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 8 13 2 7 30

3.33 2.87 0.75 3.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 13 0 2 16

0.42 2.87 0.00 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 4 14 0 3 21

1.67 3.09 0.00 1.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

75

Page 77: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 12 13 6 10 41

5.00 2.87 2.24 4.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 5 11 6 2 24

2.08 2.43 2.24 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 6 3 8 2 19

2.50 0.66 2.99 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 4 1 2 11

1.67 0.88 0.37 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 2 2 2 7

0.42 0.44 0.75 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 16 1 2 19

0.00 3.53 0.37 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 10 6 6 2 24

4.17 1.32 2.24 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 1 3

0.42 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 0 1 3

0.42 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 3 1 0 1 5

1.25 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 6 0 0 6

0.00 1.32 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 9 2 4 1 16

3.75 0.44 1.49 0.44

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

76

Page 78: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 9 0 6 17

0.83 1.99 0.00 2.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 5 0 1 0 6

2.08 0.00 0.37 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 1 4 0 1 6

0.42 0.88 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 268 229 1190

20.17 38.07 22.52 19.24===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 5 53 48 15 42 19 182

12.50 15.06 14.68 13.16 17.14 16.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 7 58 47 18 33 13 176

17.50 16.48 14.37 15.79 13.47 11.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 3 39 19 12 9 4 86

7.50 11.08 5.81 10.53 3.67 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 2 25 36 9 34 13 119

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

77

Page 79: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.00 7.10 11.01 7.89 13.88 11.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 1 9 15 4 19 12 60

2.50 2.56 4.59 3.51 7.76 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 1 22 24 4 10 4 65

2.50 6.25 7.34 3.51 4.08 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 0 16 21 6 9 3 55

0.00 4.55 6.42 5.26 3.67 2.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 5 21 22 11 22 12 93

12.50 5.97 6.73 9.65 8.98 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 11 14 3 7 0 37

5.00 3.12 4.28 2.63 2.86 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 14 7 2 10 6 40

2.50 3.98 2.14 1.75 4.08 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 15 8 5 1 0 30

2.50 4.26 2.45 4.39 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 1 0 1 7 6 16

2.50 0.28 0.00 0.88 2.86 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 0 5 2 3 5 6 21

0.00 1.42 0.61 2.63 2.04 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 4 16 13 3 4 1 41

10.00 4.55 3.98 2.63 1.63 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 4 7 10 0 2 1 24

10.00 1.99 3.06 0.00 0.82 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 6 6 5 2 0 19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

78

Page 80: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.70 1.83 4.39 0.82 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 2 3 4 1 1 0 11

5.00 0.85 1.22 0.88 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 0 3 0 2 2 7

0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.82 1.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 1 2 3 3 8 3 20

2.50 0.57 0.92 2.63 3.27 2.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 0 8 6 3 4 4 25

0.00 2.27 1.83 2.63 1.63 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 1 2 0 0 1 4

0.00 0.28 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 2 0 0 0 3

0.00 0.28 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 3 1 0 1 0 5

0.00 0.85 0.31 0.00 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 2 1 1 1 5

0.00 0.00 0.61 0.88 0.41 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 0 8 2 0 5 1 16

0.00 2.27 0.61 0.00 2.04 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 5 3 2 5 1 16

0.00 1.42 0.92 1.75 2.04 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 1 4 0 2 0 7

0.00 0.28 1.22 0.00 0.82 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

79

Page 81: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 1 3 3 0 0 7

0.00 0.28 0.92 2.63 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 327 114 245 113 1191

3.36 29.55 27.46 9.57 20.57 9.49======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 24 52 21 41 41 179

13.04 19.62 15.79 14.64 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 30 51 16 42 37 176

16.30 19.25 12.03 15.00 11.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 8 20 10 29 20 87

4.35 7.55 7.52 10.36 6.12-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 7 9 42 50 118

5.43 2.64 6.77 15.00 15.29-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 4 17 8 17 15 61

2.17 6.42 6.02 6.07 4.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 10 7 7 20 21 65

5.43 2.64 5.26 7.14 6.42-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

80

Page 82: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Health care 6 16 5 9 20 563.26 6.04 3.76 3.21 6.12

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 13 23 2 26 29 93

7.07 8.68 1.50 9.29 8.87-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 8 11 5 7 7 38

4.35 4.15 3.76 2.50 2.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 21 7 4 4 4 40

11.41 2.64 3.01 1.43 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 9 6 5 2 8 30

4.89 2.26 3.76 0.71 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 2 2 4 2 6 16

1.09 0.75 3.01 0.71 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 5 1 3 3 9 21

2.72 0.38 2.26 1.07 2.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 11 13 6 8 4 42

5.98 4.91 4.51 2.86 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 3 6 5 6 4 24

1.63 2.26 3.76 2.14 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 1 6 4 1 8 20

0.54 2.26 3.01 0.36 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 0 1 4 9

1.63 0.38 0.00 0.36 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 2 3 8

0.00 0.38 1.50 0.71 0.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

81

Page 83: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Environment 1 2 1 3 12 190.54 0.75 0.75 1.07 3.67

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 4 4 5 3 8 24

2.17 1.51 3.76 1.07 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 1 0 3

0.54 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 2 3

0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 1 1 0 3 0 5

0.54 0.38 0.00 1.07 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 2 1 2 1 6

0.00 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 4 6 2 1 2 15

2.17 2.26 1.50 0.36 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 2 1 4 8 17

1.09 0.75 0.75 1.43 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 5 1 1 7

0.00 0.00 3.76 0.36 0.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 0 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 2 0 1 0 3 6

1.09 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 265 133 280 327 1189

15.48 22.29 11.19 23.55 27.50=====================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

82

Page 84: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 125 13 29 7 1 4 3 182

17.53 8.44 10.82 31.82 25.00 30.77 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 144 4 21 0 2 1 5 177

20.20 2.60 7.84 0.00 50.00 7.69 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 22 33 25 7 0 0 0 87

3.09 21.43 9.33 31.82 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 69 15 26 3 0 2 3 118

9.68 9.74 9.70 13.64 0.00 15.38 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 34 4 20 1 0 1 0 60

4.77 2.60 7.46 4.55 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 29 9 25 1 0 0 0 64

4.07 5.84 9.33 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 27 17 12 0 0 0 0 56

3.79 11.04 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 70 8 13 1 0 1 1 94

9.82 5.19 4.85 4.55 0.00 7.69 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 5 15 1 0 2 0 37

1.96 3.25 5.60 4.55 0.00 15.38 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

83

Page 85: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 32 2 3 0 0 0 2 39

4.49 1.30 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 11 4 15 0 0 0 0 30

1.54 2.60 5.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 10 2 3 0 0 1 0 16

1.40 1.30 1.12 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 11 6 4 0 0 0 0 21

1.54 3.90 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 13 9 17 1 0 1 0 41

1.82 5.84 6.34 4.55 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 3 11 0 0 0 0 23

1.26 1.95 4.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 20

1.96 3.25 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 6 1 2 0 1 0 0 10

0.84 0.65 0.75 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 8

0.84 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 19

2.24 1.30 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 23

1.54 0.00 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 4

0.28 0.65 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

84

Page 86: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.65 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 7

0.42 1.30 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15

2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 4 6 0 0 0 0 17

0.98 2.60 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7

0.56 1.30 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 713 154 268 22 4 13 14 1188

60.02 12.96 22.56 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

85

Page 87: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 117 3 23 8 21 9 181

18.28 13.04 15.44 12.12 8.40 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 106 2 15 19 28 5 175

16.56 8.70 10.07 28.79 11.20 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 31 3 9 2 38 4 87

4.84 13.04 6.04 3.03 15.20 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 45 1 34 5 24 8 117

7.03 4.35 22.82 7.58 9.60 14.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 32 0 10 5 10 3 60

5.00 0.00 6.71 7.58 4.00 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 32 3 3 3 14 9 64

5.00 13.04 2.01 4.55 5.60 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 26 1 9 4 13 3 56

4.06 4.35 6.04 6.06 5.20 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 55 3 4 3 25 3 93

8.59 13.04 2.68 4.55 10.00 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 20 1 7 3 4 4 39

3.12 4.35 4.70 4.55 1.60 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 29 0 6 2 3 0 40

4.53 0.00 4.03 3.03 1.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 16 0 3 2 8 0 29

2.50 0.00 2.01 3.03 3.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 0 2 0 5 0 15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

86

Page 88: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.25 0.00 1.34 0.00 2.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 14 0 3 0 4 0 21

2.19 0.00 2.01 0.00 1.60 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 21 3 5 1 12 0 42

3.28 13.04 3.36 1.52 4.80 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 15 1 3 1 2 1 23

2.34 4.35 2.01 1.52 0.80 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 12 0 4 0 2 2 20

1.88 0.00 2.68 0.00 0.80 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 1 0 0 5 0 10

0.62 4.35 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 0 0 0 3 0 7

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 0 2 0 7 1 19

1.41 0.00 1.34 0.00 2.80 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 8 0 1 4 9 3 25

1.25 0.00 0.67 6.06 3.60 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 3 0 0 1 0 0 4

0.47 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 0 0 0 1 0 5

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 5 0 0 0 0 1 6

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

87

Page 89: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 6 0 0 0 9 0 15

0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.60 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 1 4 2 1 0 17

1.41 4.35 2.68 3.03 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 3 0 2 1 0 0 6

0.47 0.00 1.34 1.52 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 0 0 0 1 1 6

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 640 23 149 66 250 57 1185

54.01 1.94 12.57 5.57 21.10 4.81=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Immigration 95 87 182

17.03 13.77-----------------------------------------------------------Border security 85 91 176

15.23 14.40-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

88

Page 90: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 38 48 866.81 7.59

-----------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 72 46 118

12.90 7.28-----------------------------------------------------------Education 16 45 61

2.87 7.12-----------------------------------------------------------The economy 22 43 65

3.94 6.80-----------------------------------------------------------Health care 21 34 55

3.76 5.38-----------------------------------------------------------Water supply 51 43 94

9.14 6.80-----------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 9 28 37

1.61 4.43-----------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 14 26 40

2.51 4.11-----------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 10 20 30

1.79 3.16-----------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 9 7 16

1.61 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 9 12 21

1.61 1.90-----------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 21 21 42

3.76 3.32-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

89

Page 91: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State government spending 11 13 241.97 2.06

-----------------------------------------------------------Taxes 12 8 20

2.15 1.27-----------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 6 10

0.72 0.95-----------------------------------------------------------Energy 5 3 8

0.90 0.47-----------------------------------------------------------Environment 10 9 19

1.79 1.42-----------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 14 10 24

2.51 1.58-----------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 3

0.18 0.32-----------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 1 3

0.36 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 1 5

0.72 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Voting system 1 5 6

0.18 0.79-----------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 9 6 15

1.61 0.95-----------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 12 16

0.72 1.90-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

90

Page 92: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 3 3 60.54 0.47

-----------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 1

0.18 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 5 2 7

0.90 0.32-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 632 1190

46.89 53.11===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 44 95 43 182

12.46 16.13 17.34---------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 32 104 40 176

9.07 17.66 16.13---------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 28 46 12 86

7.93 7.81 4.84---------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 44 60 15 119

12.46 10.19 6.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Education 21 33 7 61

5.95 5.60 2.82

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

91

Page 93: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 16 34 15 65

4.53 5.77 6.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 26 18 11 55

7.37 3.06 4.44---------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 22 40 32 94

6.23 6.79 12.90---------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 17 16 4 37

4.82 2.72 1.61---------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 8 21 10 39

2.27 3.57 4.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 9 19 3 31

2.55 3.23 1.21---------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 7 1 16

2.27 1.19 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 2 11 8 21

0.57 1.87 3.23---------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 14 16 11 41

3.97 2.72 4.44---------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 7 7 23

2.55 1.19 2.82---------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 7 9 4 20

1.98 1.53 1.61---------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 7 3 1 11

1.98 0.51 0.40

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

92

Page 94: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 7 0 7

0.00 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 8 2 19

2.55 1.36 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 10 11 3 24

2.83 1.87 1.21---------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 1 4

0.28 0.34 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 1 2

0.28 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 0 1 5

1.13 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 2 2 7

0.85 0.34 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 1 4 10 15

0.28 0.68 4.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 5 9 2 16

1.42 1.53 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------The media 2 4 0 6

0.57 0.68 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 3 3 1 7

0.85 0.51 0.40

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

93

Page 95: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 353 589 248 1190

29.66 49.50 20.84=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 37 54 24 13 54 182

14.68 14.67 20.51 12.15 15.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 37 55 19 8 58 177

14.68 14.95 16.24 7.48 16.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 13 27 2 9 35 86

5.16 7.34 1.71 8.41 10.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 28 42 9 13 26 118

11.11 11.41 7.69 12.15 7.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 25 7 7 11 62

4.76 6.79 5.98 6.54 3.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 11 32 4 4 14 65

4.37 8.70 3.42 3.74 4.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 15 9 4 9 18 55

5.95 2.45 3.42 8.41 5.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 4 28 5 15 41 93

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

94

Page 96: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.59 7.61 4.27 14.02 11.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 8 7 2 6 37

5.56 2.17 5.98 1.87 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 4 12 1 3 19 39

1.59 3.26 0.85 2.80 5.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 6 11 7 1 6 31

2.38 2.99 5.98 0.93 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 3 5 3 2 3 16

1.19 1.36 2.56 1.87 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 10 1 3 2 5 21

3.97 0.27 2.56 1.87 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 9 6 0 15 40

3.97 2.45 5.13 0.00 4.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 8 4 2 4 6 24

3.17 1.09 1.71 3.74 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 11 1 2 2 4 20

4.37 0.27 1.71 1.87 1.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 5 0 0 1 11

1.98 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 5 0 0 0 7

0.79 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 3 6 0 5 5 19

1.19 1.63 0.00 4.67 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 12 3 4 2 4 25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

95

Page 97: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.76 0.82 3.42 1.87 1.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 0 0 1 4

0.40 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 3 0 1 5

0.00 0.27 2.56 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 1 0 1 1 3 6

0.40 0.00 0.85 0.93 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 2 7 0 1 6 16

0.79 1.90 0.00 0.93 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 3 8 2 1 2 16

1.19 2.17 1.71 0.93 0.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 6 0 0 0 6

0.00 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 2 2 2 1 7

0.00 0.54 1.71 1.87 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 368 117 107 347 1191

21.16 30.90 9.82 8.98 29.14========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

96

Page 98: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 23 34 97 27 181

11.86 10.97 21.09 11.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 11 34 81 52 178

5.67 10.97 17.61 22.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 28 28 25 5 86

14.43 9.03 5.43 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 28 59 22 119

5.15 9.03 12.83 9.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 17 13 22 9 61

8.76 4.19 4.78 3.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 17 21 19 8 65

8.76 6.77 4.13 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 7 17 21 12 57

3.61 5.48 4.57 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 18 24 26 25 93

9.28 7.74 5.65 10.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 9 11 12 5 37

4.64 3.55 2.61 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 11 11 14 39

1.55 3.55 2.39 6.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

97

Page 99: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Social welfare programs 6 8 4 11 293.09 2.58 0.87 4.82

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 7 7 1 16

0.52 2.26 1.52 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 0 5 8 8 21

0.00 1.61 1.74 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 17 12 2 41

5.15 5.48 2.61 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 1 11 8 3 23

0.52 3.55 1.74 1.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 3 3 14 0 20

1.55 0.97 3.04 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 6 1 3 1 11

3.09 0.32 0.65 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 2 2 0 8

2.06 0.65 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 3 2 10 4 19

1.55 0.65 2.17 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 6 9 4 5 24

3.09 2.90 0.87 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 2 1 4

0.52 0.00 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 1 3

1.03 0.00 0.00 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

98

Page 100: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Insurance rates 0 2 0 3 50.00 0.65 0.00 1.32

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 2 2 2 6

0.00 0.65 0.43 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 4 7 4 1 16

2.06 2.26 0.87 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 3 7 3 3 16

1.55 2.26 0.65 1.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 3 2 1 6

0.00 0.97 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 1 3 2 1 7

0.52 0.97 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 194 310 460 228 1192

16.28 26.01 38.59 19.13==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

99

Page 101: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q6. Obama Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 27 54 27 68 7 6 11 200

43.55 51.43 28.12 18.89 5.60 2.59 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 25 43 43 105 15 5 6 242

40.32 40.95 44.79 29.17 12.00 2.16 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

100

Page 102: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 5 4 5 42 4 2 6 688.06 3.81 5.21 11.67 3.20 0.86 2.75

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 2 3 13 42 12 19 6 97

3.23 2.86 13.54 11.67 9.60 8.19 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 2 1 8 95 82 199 189 576

3.23 0.95 8.33 26.39 65.60 85.78 86.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 0 0 8 5 1 0 15

1.61 0.00 0.00 2.22 4.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 105 96 360 125 232 218 1198

5.18 8.76 8.01 30.05 10.43 19.37 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 108 68 24 200

41.22 18.89 4.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 110 105 26 241

41.98 29.17 4.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 15 42 12 69

5.73 11.67 2.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 18 42 37 97

6.87 11.67 6.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

101

Page 103: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 10 95 470 575

3.82 26.39 81.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 8 6 15

0.38 2.22 1.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 575 1197

21.89 30.08 48.04==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 126 25 32 14 0 3 0 200

49.22 21.93 26.67 12.17 0.00 2.42 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 91 49 60 11 3 9 6 229

35.55 42.98 50.00 9.57 2.48 7.26 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 13 14 7 13 1 6 6 60

5.08 12.28 5.83 11.30 0.83 4.84 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 20 12 9 14 9 15 15 94

7.81 10.53 7.50 12.17 7.44 12.10 5.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 1 14 12 61 108 89 270 555

0.39 12.28 10.00 53.04 89.26 71.77 90.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 0 0 2 0 2 0 9

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

102

Page 104: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.95 0.00 0.00 1.74 0.00 1.61 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 120 115 121 124 297 1147

22.32 9.94 10.46 10.03 10.55 10.81 25.89=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 183 14 3 200

37.50 12.17 0.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 199 11 18 228

40.78 9.57 3.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 34 13 13 60

6.97 11.30 2.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 40 14 39 93

8.20 12.17 7.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 27 61 467 555

5.53 53.04 86.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 2 2 9

1.02 1.74 0.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 115 542 1145

42.62 10.04 47.34================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

103

Page 105: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 2 176 0 22 200

0.84 38.77 0.00 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 11 198 4 28 241

4.60 43.61 1.50 11.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 16 26 1 24 67

6.69 5.73 0.38 10.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 34 35 6 24 99

14.23 7.71 2.26 10.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 176 15 255 129 575

73.64 3.30 95.86 54.20------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 4 0 11 15

0.00 0.88 0.00 4.62------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 454 266 238 1197

19.97 37.93 22.22 19.88========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

104

Page 106: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 1 45 66 19 42 28 201

2.50 12.82 19.82 16.52 17.07 24.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 11 68 50 27 64 22 242

27.50 19.37 15.02 23.48 26.02 19.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 2 26 19 6 10 5 68

5.00 7.41 5.71 5.22 4.07 4.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 4 38 35 8 9 4 98

10.00 10.83 10.51 6.96 3.66 3.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 18 171 156 54 121 56 576

45.00 48.72 46.85 46.96 49.19 48.70-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 3 7 1 0 0 15

10.00 0.85 2.10 0.87 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 333 115 246 115 1200

3.33 29.25 27.75 9.58 20.50 9.58===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

105

Page 107: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 27 27 16 56 74 20014.44 10.19 12.21 19.93 22.56

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 20 34 32 55 101 242

10.70 12.83 24.43 19.57 30.79----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 6 18 9 17 18 68

3.21 6.79 6.87 6.05 5.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 19 22 9 27 20 97

10.16 8.30 6.87 9.61 6.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 111 163 62 125 110 571

59.36 61.51 47.33 44.48 33.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 1 3 1 5 14

2.14 0.38 2.29 0.36 1.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 281 328 1192

15.69 22.23 10.99 23.57 27.52==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 80 70 48 2 0 1 0 201

11.16 44.87 17.71 9.09 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 114 47 71 3 0 3 3 241

15.90 30.13 26.20 13.64 0.00 21.43 21.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

106

Page 108: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 28 17 19 3 0 1 0 68

3.91 10.90 7.01 13.64 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 45 11 31 9 0 2 0 98

6.28 7.05 11.44 40.91 0.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 447 6 95 5 4 7 11 575

62.34 3.85 35.06 22.73 100.00 50.00 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 5 7 0 0 0 0 15

0.42 3.21 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 156 271 22 4 14 14 1198

59.85 13.02 22.62 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 87 3 30 10 56 15 201

13.43 13.04 19.87 15.38 21.96 25.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 108 3 38 9 66 18 242

16.67 13.04 25.17 13.85 25.88 31.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 3 12 2 17 7 68

4.17 13.04 7.95 3.08 6.67 12.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 42 1 14 4 34 3 98

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

107

Page 109: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.48 4.35 9.27 6.15 13.33 5.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 374 12 57 40 77 15 575

57.72 52.17 37.75 61.54 30.20 25.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 1 0 0 5 0 16

1.54 4.35 0.00 0.00 1.96 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 255 58 1200

54.00 1.92 12.58 5.42 21.25 4.83==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 88 113 201

15.69 17.71--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 112 130 242

19.96 20.38--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 23 45 68

4.10 7.05--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 40 58 98

7.13 9.09--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 292 283 575

52.05 44.36--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

108

Page 110: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 9 151.07 1.41

--------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 85 93 22 200

23.88 15.76 8.87------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 94 122 26 242

26.40 20.68 10.48------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 27 14 68

7.58 4.58 5.65------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 33 43 22 98

9.27 7.29 8.87------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 113 299 162 574

31.74 50.68 65.32------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 6 2 12

1.12 1.02 0.81------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 248 1194

29.82 49.41 20.77

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

109

Page 111: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 54 64 15 26 42 201

21.60 17.39 12.20 24.30 11.97-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 46 90 19 33 53 241

18.40 24.46 15.45 30.84 15.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 14 19 14 7 14 68

5.60 5.16 11.38 6.54 3.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 21 25 10 7 35 98

8.40 6.79 8.13 6.54 9.97-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 114 166 62 33 201 576

45.60 45.11 50.41 30.84 57.26-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 4 3 1 6 15

0.40 1.09 2.44 0.93 1.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 123 107 351 1199

20.85 30.69 10.26 8.92 29.27=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

110

Page 112: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 29 61 80 30 200

14.57 19.37 17.43 13.27-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 44 66 99 33 242

22.11 20.95 21.57 14.60-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 19 28 17 4 68

9.55 8.89 3.70 1.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 32 31 26 9 98

16.08 9.84 5.66 3.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 67 127 232 150 576

33.67 40.32 50.54 66.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 2 5 0 15

4.02 0.63 1.09 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 315 459 226 1199

16.60 26.27 38.28 18.85=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

111

Page 113: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q7. Congress Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 7 1 0 6 2 5 13 34

11.11 0.98 0.00 1.67 1.63 2.19 5.99--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 2 6 7 41 12 13 13 94

3.17 5.88 7.29 11.39 9.76 5.70 5.99--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

112

Page 114: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 3 15 16 74 11 31 25 1754.76 14.71 16.67 20.56 8.94 13.60 11.52

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 10 18 11 68 35 75 60 277

15.87 17.65 11.46 18.89 28.46 32.89 27.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 40 61 60 152 58 102 104 577

63.49 59.80 62.50 42.22 47.15 44.74 47.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 1 2 19 5 2 2 32

1.59 0.98 2.08 5.28 4.07 0.88 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 102 96 360 123 228 217 1189

5.30 8.58 8.07 30.28 10.34 19.18 18.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 8 6 20 34

3.07 1.67 3.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 15 41 38 94

5.75 11.39 6.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 34 74 68 176

13.03 20.56 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 39 68 171 278

14.94 18.89 30.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

113

Page 115: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 162 152 264 578

62.07 42.22 46.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 19 9 31

1.15 5.28 1.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 570 1191

21.91 30.23 47.86==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 23 1 1 1 0 1 6 33

9.20 0.88 0.85 0.89 0.00 0.80 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 30 18 5 7 5 6 19 90

12.00 15.79 4.27 6.25 4.17 4.80 6.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 41 20 11 16 13 22 35 158

16.40 17.54 9.40 14.29 10.83 17.60 11.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 35 23 15 23 32 40 99 267

14.00 20.18 12.82 20.54 26.67 32.00 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 114 45 85 63 70 54 135 566

45.60 39.47 72.65 56.25 58.33 43.20 45.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 7 0 2 0 2 3 21

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

114

Page 116: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

2.80 6.14 0.00 1.79 0.00 1.60 1.01---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 114 117 112 120 125 297 1135

22.03 10.04 10.31 9.87 10.57 11.01 26.17=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 26 1 8 35

5.39 0.89 1.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 52 7 30 89

10.79 6.25 5.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 72 16 70 158

14.94 14.29 12.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 74 23 171 268

15.35 20.54 31.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 244 63 258 565

50.62 56.25 47.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 2 6 22

2.90 1.79 1.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 543 1137

42.39 9.85 47.76================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

115

Page 117: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 5 23 2 5 35

2.07 5.12 0.75 2.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 21 49 15 11 96

8.71 10.91 5.64 4.64------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 43 57 22 53 175

17.84 12.69 8.27 22.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 74 67 80 59 280

30.71 14.92 30.08 24.89------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 96 247 147 87 577

39.83 55.01 55.26 36.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 6 0 22 30

0.83 1.34 0.00 9.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 449 266 237 1193

20.20 37.64 22.30 19.87========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

116

Page 118: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 0 16 15 2 1 0 34

0.00 4.55 4.56 1.82 0.40 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 3 25 28 8 25 6 95

7.32 7.10 8.51 7.27 10.12 5.26-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 5 69 44 17 33 8 176

12.20 19.60 13.37 15.45 13.36 7.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 13 64 91 35 50 28 281

31.71 18.18 27.66 31.82 20.24 24.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 16 166 142 46 135 71 576

39.02 47.16 43.16 41.82 54.66 62.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 12 9 2 3 1 31

9.76 3.41 2.74 1.82 1.21 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 329 110 247 114 1193

3.44 29.51 27.58 9.22 20.70 9.56===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

117

Page 119: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 7 6 2 6 13 343.80 2.26 1.54 2.13 3.98

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 16 24 18 21 16 95

8.70 9.06 13.85 7.45 4.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 28 42 30 34 40 174

15.22 15.85 23.08 12.06 12.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 57 82 21 60 60 280

30.98 30.94 16.15 21.28 18.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 69 107 55 159 184 574

37.50 40.38 42.31 56.38 56.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 4 4 2 14 31

3.80 1.51 3.08 0.71 4.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 265 130 282 327 1188

15.49 22.31 10.94 23.74 27.53==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 14 9 8 2 0 0 1 34

1.95 6.08 2.94 9.09 0.00 0.00 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 33 25 28 7 0 1 1 95

4.60 16.89 10.29 31.82 0.00 7.69 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

118

Page 120: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 78 34 59 2 1 1 0 175

10.86 22.97 21.69 9.09 25.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 191 22 54 6 2 4 1 280

26.60 14.86 19.85 27.27 50.00 30.77 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 390 51 113 5 1 7 10 577

54.32 34.46 41.54 22.73 25.00 53.85 76.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 7 10 0 0 0 0 29

1.67 4.73 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 148 272 22 4 13 13 1190

60.34 12.44 22.86 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 9 1 0 0 24 0 34

1.39 4.35 0.00 0.00 9.64 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 38 2 10 4 38 4 96

5.87 8.70 6.71 6.15 15.26 6.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 84 8 22 6 47 7 174

12.98 34.78 14.77 9.23 18.88 12.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 173 4 35 20 38 11 281

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

119

Page 121: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

26.74 17.39 23.49 30.77 15.26 18.97------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 326 8 79 33 96 34 576

50.39 34.78 53.02 50.77 38.55 58.62------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 0 3 2 6 2 30

2.63 0.00 2.01 3.08 2.41 3.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 149 65 249 58 1191

54.32 1.93 12.51 5.46 20.91 4.87==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 22 12 34

3.96 1.89--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 41 54 95

7.39 8.49--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 62 113 175

11.17 17.77--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 117 163 280

21.08 25.63--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 305 272 577

54.95 42.77--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

120

Page 122: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 8 22 301.44 3.46

--------------------------------------------------------Total 555 636 1191

46.60 53.40========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 17 10 7 34

4.75 1.71 2.86------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 32 46 16 94

8.94 7.86 6.53------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 67 59 50 176

18.72 10.09 20.41------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 78 140 62 280

21.79 23.93 25.31------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 152 319 106 577

42.46 54.53 43.27------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 11 4 27

3.35 1.88 1.63------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 585 245 1188

30.13 49.24 20.62

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

121

Page 123: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 5 13 0 5 12 35

1.99 3.58 0.00 4.59 3.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 29 22 5 4 34 94

11.55 6.06 4.10 3.67 9.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 38 47 28 12 51 176

15.14 12.95 22.95 11.01 14.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 55 83 26 26 91 281

21.91 22.87 21.31 23.85 26.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 121 189 56 57 155 578

48.21 52.07 45.90 52.29 44.29-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 9 7 5 7 31

1.20 2.48 5.74 4.59 2.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 363 122 109 350 1195

21.00 30.38 10.21 9.12 29.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

122

Page 124: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 16 11 6 1 34

8.21 3.55 1.30 0.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 33 25 30 7 95

16.92 8.06 6.52 3.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 41 65 49 21 176

21.03 20.97 10.65 9.25-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 44 70 114 52 280

22.56 22.58 24.78 22.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 53 126 255 143 577

27.18 40.65 55.43 63.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 13 6 3 30

4.10 4.19 1.30 1.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 310 460 227 1192

16.36 26.01 38.59 19.04=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

123

Page 125: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q8. Rick Perry Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 8 3 2 25 22 81 99 240

12.70 2.91 2.08 6.93 17.60 35.06 45.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 1 8 5 71 42 101 71 299

1.59 7.77 5.21 19.67 33.60 43.72 32.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

124

Page 126: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 6 4 18 92 28 27 22 1979.52 3.88 18.75 25.48 22.40 11.69 10.05

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 3 13 12 52 13 10 16 119

4.76 12.62 12.50 14.40 10.40 4.33 7.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 45 68 54 94 15 11 10 297

71.43 66.02 56.25 26.04 12.00 4.76 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 7 5 27 5 1 1 46

0.00 6.80 5.21 7.48 4.00 0.43 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 361 125 231 219 1198

5.26 8.60 8.01 30.13 10.43 19.28 18.28============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 13 25 202 240

4.96 6.93 35.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 14 71 214 299

5.34 19.67 37.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 92 77 196

10.31 25.48 13.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 28 52 39 119

10.69 14.40 6.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

125

Page 127: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 167 94 35 296

63.74 26.04 6.10------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 27 7 47

4.96 7.48 1.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 574 1197

21.89 30.16 47.95==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 24 5 3 13 36 23 129 233

9.38 4.42 2.52 11.61 29.75 18.55 43.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 25 11 11 18 53 50 116 284

9.77 9.73 9.24 16.07 43.80 40.32 39.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 30 32 17 34 14 29 28 184

11.72 28.32 14.29 30.36 11.57 23.39 9.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 28 20 14 17 11 12 14 116

10.94 17.70 11.76 15.18 9.09 9.68 4.71---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 141 40 74 16 4 8 9 292

55.08 35.40 62.18 14.29 3.31 6.45 3.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 5 0 14 3 2 1 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

126

Page 128: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.12 4.42 0.00 12.50 2.48 1.61 0.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 297 1142

22.42 9.89 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 32 13 188 233

6.54 11.61 34.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 47 18 219 284

9.61 16.07 40.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 80 34 71 185

16.36 30.36 13.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 62 17 37 116

12.68 15.18 6.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 255 16 21 292

52.15 14.29 3.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 14 6 33

2.66 12.50 1.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

127

Page 129: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 69 27 98 45 239

28.87 5.93 36.84 18.91------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 81 43 117 59 300

33.89 9.45 43.98 24.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 49 63 24 60 196

20.50 13.85 9.02 25.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 21 60 17 22 120

8.79 13.19 6.39 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 13 254 8 22 297

5.44 55.82 3.01 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 8 2 30 46

2.51 1.76 0.75 12.61------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 455 266 238 1198

19.95 37.98 22.20 19.87========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

128

Page 130: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 7 75 66 21 51 20 240

17.07 21.37 19.88 18.42 20.73 17.39-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 13 94 76 31 58 27 299

31.71 26.78 22.89 27.19 23.58 23.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 4 75 51 16 33 17 196

9.76 21.37 15.36 14.04 13.41 14.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 1 30 38 17 23 11 120

2.44 8.55 11.45 14.91 9.35 9.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 12 57 85 26 77 40 297

29.27 16.24 25.60 22.81 31.30 34.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 20 16 3 4 0 47

9.76 5.70 4.82 2.63 1.63 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 332 114 246 115 1199

3.42 29.27 27.69 9.51 20.52 9.59===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

129

Page 131: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 67 60 28 39 44 23835.83 22.64 21.21 13.88 13.54

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 45 89 30 83 51 298

24.06 33.58 22.73 29.54 15.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 24 51 34 40 47 196

12.83 19.25 25.76 14.23 14.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 19 25 12 24 36 116

10.16 9.43 9.09 8.54 11.08----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 24 30 24 90 128 296

12.83 11.32 18.18 32.03 39.38----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 10 4 5 19 46

4.28 3.77 3.03 1.78 5.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 132 281 325 1190

15.71 22.27 11.09 23.61 27.31==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 174 11 42 4 2 2 5 240

24.34 7.05 15.44 17.39 50.00 16.67 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 201 16 62 11 0 5 4 299

28.11 10.26 22.79 47.83 0.00 41.67 28.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

130

Page 132: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 95 39 57 3 2 0 1 197

13.29 25.00 20.96 13.04 50.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 57 24 33 3 0 0 1 118

7.97 15.38 12.13 13.04 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 175 54 57 2 0 5 3 296

24.48 34.62 20.96 8.70 0.00 41.67 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 12 21 0 0 0 0 46

1.82 7.69 7.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 272 23 4 12 14 1196

59.78 13.04 22.74 1.92 0.33 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 148 3 16 14 51 6 238

22.95 13.04 10.67 21.54 20.08 10.53------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 180 6 29 23 48 12 298

27.91 26.09 19.33 35.38 18.90 21.05------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 101 4 27 9 46 9 196

15.66 17.39 18.00 13.85 18.11 15.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 65 1 21 6 22 4 119

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

131

Page 133: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

10.08 4.35 14.00 9.23 8.66 7.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 134 4 57 13 71 18 297

20.78 17.39 38.00 20.00 27.95 31.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 5 0 0 16 8 46

2.64 21.74 0.00 0.00 6.30 14.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 23 150 65 254 57 1194

54.02 1.93 12.56 5.44 21.27 4.77==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 127 113 240

22.64 17.74--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 135 164 299

24.06 25.75--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 89 107 196

15.86 16.80--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 55 65 120

9.80 10.20--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 139 158 297

24.78 24.80--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

132

Page 134: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 16 30 462.85 4.71

--------------------------------------------------------Total 561 637 1198

46.83 53.17========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 66 113 61 240

18.59 19.19 24.60------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 63 148 87 298

17.75 25.13 35.08------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 56 100 39 195

15.77 16.98 15.73------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 50 58 12 120

14.08 9.85 4.84------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 107 150 39 296

30.14 25.47 15.73------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 20 10 43

3.66 3.40 4.03------------------------------------------------------------------Total 355 589 248 1192

29.78 49.41 20.81

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

133

Page 135: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 44 72 29 13 81 239

17.67 19.62 23.77 12.15 23.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 58 85 32 16 107 298

23.29 23.16 26.23 14.95 30.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 44 60 18 15 58 195

17.67 16.35 14.75 14.02 16.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 30 38 11 18 23 120

12.05 10.35 9.02 16.82 6.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 65 98 28 43 63 297

26.10 26.70 22.95 40.19 18.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 14 4 2 18 46

3.21 3.81 3.28 1.87 5.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 367 122 107 350 1195

20.84 30.71 10.21 8.95 29.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

134

Page 136: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 24 56 105 54 239

12.12 17.95 22.88 24.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 46 73 109 70 298

23.23 23.40 23.75 31.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 50 60 62 24 196

25.25 19.23 13.51 10.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 29 26 44 20 119

14.65 8.33 9.59 8.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 30 77 134 55 296

15.15 24.68 29.19 24.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 20 5 2 46

9.60 6.41 1.09 0.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 459 225 1194

16.58 26.13 38.44 18.84=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

135

Page 137: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q9. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Country

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 24 66 37 108 18 9 10 272

39.34 64.08 38.54 30.17 14.52 3.91 4.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 23 21 40 173 93 216 202 768

37.70 20.39 41.67 48.32 75.00 93.91 93.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

136

Page 138: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 14 16 19 77 13 5 5 14922.95 15.53 19.79 21.51 10.48 2.17 2.30

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 103 96 358 124 230 217 1189

5.13 8.66 8.07 30.11 10.43 19.34 18.25=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 127 108 38 273

49.03 30.17 6.64---------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 83 173 511 767

32.05 48.32 89.34---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 49 77 23 149

18.92 21.51 4.02---------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 358 572 1189

21.78 30.11 48.11===============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

137

Page 139: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 135 40 54 17 5 7 8 266

52.94 35.40 45.76 15.18 4.10 5.65 2.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 69 48 45 81 113 104 281 741

27.06 42.48 38.14 72.32 92.62 83.87 95.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 25 19 14 4 13 5 131

20.00 22.12 16.10 12.50 3.28 10.48 1.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 112 122 124 294 1138

22.41 9.93 10.37 9.84 10.72 10.90 25.83==========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 230 17 20 267

47.23 15.18 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 162 81 498 741

33.26 72.32 92.22-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 95 14 22 131

19.51 12.50 4.07-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 112 540 1139

42.76 9.83 47.41=================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

138

Page 140: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 17 227 4 26 274

7.20 50.11 1.50 10.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 204 142 261 163 770

86.44 31.35 98.12 68.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 84 1 49 149

6.36 18.54 0.38 20.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 236 453 266 238 1193

19.78 37.97 22.30 19.95=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 8 79 74 25 65 23 274

19.51 22.51 22.42 21.93 26.42 20.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 23 234 209 74 153 78 771

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

139

Page 141: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

56.10 66.67 63.33 64.91 62.20 69.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 38 47 15 28 12 150

24.39 10.83 14.24 13.16 11.38 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 330 114 246 113 1195

3.43 29.37 27.62 9.54 20.59 9.46====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 34 43 27 76 94 274

18.18 16.17 20.61 27.34 28.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 142 198 82 169 175 766

75.94 74.44 62.60 60.79 53.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 25 22 33 58 149

5.88 9.40 16.79 11.87 17.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 278 327 1189

15.73 22.37 11.02 23.38 27.50===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

140

Page 142: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 104 69 92 6 0 2 0 273

14.53 44.23 34.20 27.27 0.00 14.29 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 542 47 140 16 4 8 14 771

75.70 30.13 52.04 72.73 100.00 57.14 100.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 40 37 0 0 4 0 151

9.78 25.64 13.75 0.00 0.00 28.57 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 269 22 4 14 14 1195

59.92 13.05 22.51 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 123 2 37 13 78 21 274

18.98 8.70 24.50 20.00 31.20 36.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 462 19 90 43 132 23 769

71.30 82.61 59.60 66.15 52.80 40.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 63 2 24 9 40 13 151

9.72 8.70 15.89 13.85 16.00 22.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 250 57 1194

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

141

Page 143: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.27 1.93 12.65 5.44 20.94 4.77===================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------Right direction 133 141 274

23.79 22.17-----------------------------------------Wrong track 379 392 771

67.80 61.64-----------------------------------------Don't know 47 103 150

8.41 16.19-----------------------------------------Total 559 636 1195

46.78 53.22=========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------Right direction 116 126 32 274

32.49 21.58 12.90

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

142

Page 144: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------Wrong track 182 396 191 769

50.98 67.81 77.02---------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 62 25 146

16.53 10.62 10.08---------------------------------------------------Total 357 584 248 1189

30.03 49.12 20.86===================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 66 96 20 35 57 274

26.29 26.16 16.39 33.02 16.38----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 161 217 91 49 252 770

64.14 59.13 74.59 46.23 72.41----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 54 11 22 39 150

9.56 14.71 9.02 20.75 11.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 106 348 1194

21.02 30.74 10.22 8.88 29.15======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

143

Page 145: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------Right direction 51 71 110 41 273

25.76 22.61 24.12 18.22--------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 110 202 287 171 770

55.56 64.33 62.94 76.00--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 41 59 13 150

18.69 13.06 12.94 5.78--------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 456 225 1193

16.60 26.32 38.22 18.86========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

144

Page 146: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q10. National Economy: Better o↵/Worse O↵

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 15 10 9 32 5 4 9 84

24.19 9.71 9.28 8.91 4.03 1.72 4.13------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 24 64 54 84 24 26 7 283

38.71 62.14 55.67 23.40 19.35 11.21 3.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

145

Page 147: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About the same 13 21 22 126 25 51 50 30820.97 20.39 22.68 35.10 20.16 21.98 22.94

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 4 8 6 77 46 86 71 298

6.45 7.77 6.19 21.45 37.10 37.07 32.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 6 0 5 28 21 62 74 196

9.68 0.00 5.15 7.80 16.94 26.72 33.94------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 1 12 3 3 7 26

0.00 0.00 1.03 3.34 2.42 1.29 3.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 359 124 232 218 1195

5.19 8.62 8.12 30.04 10.38 19.41 18.24==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 32 18 84

12.88 8.91 3.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 142 84 57 283

53.79 23.40 9.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 56 126 126 308

21.21 35.10 21.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 19 77 203 299

7.20 21.45 35.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

146

Page 148: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 11 28 157 196

4.17 7.80 27.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 12 13 27

0.76 3.34 2.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 359 574 1197

22.06 29.99 47.95============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 54 7 16 2 2 0 1 82

21.18 6.14 13.33 1.79 1.67 0.00 0.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 109 42 64 19 9 12 23 278

42.75 36.84 53.33 16.96 7.50 9.76 7.72-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 43 45 23 41 25 40 71 288

16.86 39.47 19.17 36.61 20.83 32.52 23.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 33 16 16 31 50 40 99 285

12.94 14.04 13.33 27.68 41.67 32.52 33.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 8 3 1 18 34 26 99 189

3.14 2.63 0.83 16.07 28.33 21.14 33.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 1 0 1 0 5 5 20

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

147

Page 149: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.14 0.88 0.00 0.89 0.00 4.07 1.68-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 120 112 120 123 298 1142

22.33 9.98 10.51 9.81 10.51 10.77 26.09=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 77 2 3 82

15.75 1.79 0.55------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 214 19 44 277

43.76 16.96 8.12------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 111 41 137 289

22.70 36.61 25.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 65 31 189 285

13.29 27.68 34.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 13 18 159 190

2.66 16.07 29.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 1 10 20

1.84 0.89 1.85------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42==============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

148

Page 150: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 5 72 0 6 83

2.07 15.93 0.00 2.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 32 217 10 24 283

13.28 48.01 3.75 10.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 79 94 56 78 307

32.78 20.80 20.97 32.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 70 51 100 79 300

29.05 11.28 37.45 33.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 52 11 98 35 196

21.58 2.43 36.70 14.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 7 3 15 28

1.24 1.55 1.12 6.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 267 237 1197

20.13 37.76 22.31 19.80======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

149

Page 151: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 4 23 24 9 14 9 83

9.52 6.50 7.25 7.89 5.69 7.83-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 1 66 84 25 71 36 283

2.38 18.64 25.38 21.93 28.86 31.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 15 105 84 32 47 25 308

35.71 29.66 25.38 28.07 19.11 21.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 14 97 73 26 70 23 303

33.33 27.40 22.05 22.81 28.46 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 4 58 52 20 42 21 197

9.52 16.38 15.71 17.54 17.07 18.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 5 14 2 2 1 28

9.52 1.41 4.23 1.75 0.81 0.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 354 331 114 246 115 1202

3.49 29.45 27.54 9.48 20.47 9.57=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

150

Page 152: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

A lot better off 17 8 3 20 35 839.04 3.01 2.31 7.07 10.67

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 35 41 30 84 93 283

18.62 15.41 23.08 29.68 28.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 37 75 47 54 93 306

19.68 28.20 36.15 19.08 28.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 42 83 33 73 67 298

22.34 31.20 25.38 25.80 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 51 56 12 50 28 197

27.13 21.05 9.23 17.67 8.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 3 5 2 12 28

3.19 1.13 3.85 0.71 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 130 283 328 1195

15.73 22.26 10.88 23.68 27.45================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 38 22 22 1 0 0 0 83

5.29 14.29 8.12 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 140 60 72 5 0 4 0 281

19.50 38.96 26.57 22.73 0.00 30.77 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

151

Page 153: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 179 41 76 5 0 4 3 308

24.93 26.62 28.04 22.73 0.00 30.77 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 203 18 62 9 2 4 2 300

28.27 11.69 22.88 40.91 66.67 30.77 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 144 6 33 2 1 1 9 196

20.06 3.90 12.18 9.09 33.33 7.69 64.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 7 6 0 0 0 0 27

1.95 4.55 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 271 22 3 13 14 1195

60.08 12.89 22.68 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 31 2 4 3 39 5 84

4.78 8.33 2.65 4.69 15.35 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 134 4 52 14 65 14 283

20.65 16.67 34.44 21.88 25.59 24.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 168 10 34 16 56 23 307

25.89 41.67 22.52 25.00 22.05 40.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 167 3 39 20 61 11 301

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

152

Page 154: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

25.73 12.50 25.83 31.25 24.02 19.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 138 5 18 10 24 2 197

21.26 20.83 11.92 15.62 9.45 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 0 4 1 9 2 27

1.69 0.00 2.65 1.56 3.54 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 64 254 57 1199

54.13 2.00 12.59 5.34 21.18 4.75================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 48 36 84

8.56 5.64------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 140 143 283

24.96 22.41------------------------------------------------------About the same 112 196 308

19.96 30.72------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 156 145 301

27.81 22.73------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 93 103 196

16.58 16.14------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

153

Page 155: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 12 15 272.14 2.35

------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 37 33 14 84

10.36 5.58 5.65----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 109 146 28 283

30.53 24.70 11.29----------------------------------------------------------------About the same 84 153 71 308

23.53 25.89 28.63----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 80 146 74 300

22.41 24.70 29.84----------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 36 102 59 197

10.08 17.26 23.79----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 11 2 24

3.08 1.86 0.81----------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 248 1196

29.85 49.41 20.74

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

154

Page 156: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 16 29 6 15 18 84

6.43 7.88 4.96 14.02 5.13-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 65 104 21 39 53 282

26.10 28.26 17.36 36.45 15.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 69 87 36 22 93 307

27.71 23.64 29.75 20.56 26.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 41 97 38 19 106 301

16.47 26.36 31.40 17.76 30.20-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 53 47 17 10 68 195

21.29 12.77 14.05 9.35 19.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 4 3 2 13 27

2.01 1.09 2.48 1.87 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 121 107 351 1196

20.82 30.77 10.12 8.95 29.35===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

155

Page 157: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 17 22 38 6 83

8.63 7.03 8.23 2.65---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 46 74 111 51 282

23.35 23.64 24.03 22.57---------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 64 92 114 37 307

32.49 29.39 24.68 16.37---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 50 72 106 73 301

25.38 23.00 22.94 32.30---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 11 41 86 59 197

5.58 13.10 18.61 26.11---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 12 7 0 28

4.57 3.83 1.52 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 313 462 226 1198

16.44 26.13 38.56 18.86=====================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

156

Page 158: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q11. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Texas

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 10 26 21 131 73 173 152 586

16.13 25.24 21.65 36.49 58.87 74.57 70.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 39 57 58 133 30 41 41 399

62.90 55.34 59.79 37.05 24.19 17.67 19.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

157

Page 159: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 13 20 18 95 21 18 22 20720.97 19.42 18.56 26.46 16.94 7.76 10.23

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 359 124 232 215 1192

5.20 8.64 8.14 30.12 10.40 19.46 18.04=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 58 131 398 587

22.05 36.49 69.70---------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 154 133 112 399

58.56 37.05 19.61---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 95 61 207

19.39 26.46 10.68---------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 571 1193

22.05 30.09 47.86===============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

158

Page 160: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 73 44 22 51 86 72 230 578

28.63 38.60 18.49 45.95 71.07 57.60 77.44------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 131 47 72 31 17 34 52 384

51.37 41.23 60.50 27.93 14.05 27.20 17.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 23 25 29 18 19 15 180

20.00 20.18 21.01 26.13 14.88 15.20 5.05------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 111 121 125 297 1142

22.33 9.98 10.42 9.72 10.60 10.95 26.01==========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 139 51 387 577

28.43 45.95 71.53-----------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 250 31 103 384

51.12 27.93 19.04-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 100 29 51 180

20.45 26.13 9.43-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 111 541 1141

42.86 9.73 47.41=================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

159

Page 161: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 147 126 217 99 589

61.00 27.69 81.89 41.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 70 239 33 58 400

29.05 52.53 12.45 24.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 90 15 79 208

9.96 19.78 5.66 33.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 265 236 1197

20.13 38.01 22.14 19.72=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 16 188 141 49 128 66 588

39.02 53.41 42.60 43.36 52.24 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 15 93 123 40 90 39 400

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

160

Page 162: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 26.42 37.16 35.40 36.73 34.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 71 67 24 27 9 208

24.39 20.17 20.24 21.24 11.02 7.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 113 245 114 1196

3.43 29.43 27.68 9.45 20.48 9.53====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 107 146 66 132 133 584

56.91 55.30 50.38 47.14 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 48 70 38 110 133 399

25.53 26.52 29.01 39.29 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 48 27 38 63 209

17.55 18.18 20.61 13.57 19.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 264 131 280 329 1192

15.77 22.15 10.99 23.49 27.60===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

161

Page 163: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 365 52 133 17 3 7 10 587

51.05 33.33 49.08 77.27 75.00 53.85 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 246 60 82 4 0 4 4 400

34.41 38.46 30.26 18.18 0.00 30.77 28.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 104 44 56 1 1 2 0 208

14.55 28.21 20.66 4.55 25.00 15.38 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 271 22 4 13 14 1195

59.83 13.05 22.68 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 361 12 47 35 108 24 587

55.80 52.17 31.33 53.85 42.52 42.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 190 6 75 20 91 19 401

29.37 26.09 50.00 30.77 35.83 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 96 5 28 10 55 14 208

14.84 21.74 18.67 15.38 21.65 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 150 65 254 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

162

Page 164: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.10 1.92 12.54 5.43 21.24 4.77===================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------Right direction 303 284 587

54.01 44.79-----------------------------------------Wrong track 179 221 400

31.91 34.86-----------------------------------------Don't know 79 129 208

14.08 20.35-----------------------------------------Total 561 634 1195

46.95 53.05=========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------Right direction 159 305 123 587

44.92 51.69 49.60

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

163

Page 165: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------Wrong track 133 196 71 400

37.57 33.22 28.63---------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 89 54 205

17.51 15.08 21.77---------------------------------------------------Total 354 590 248 1192

29.70 49.50 20.81===================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 124 171 71 39 182 587

50.00 46.47 57.72 36.45 51.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 87 136 34 50 94 401

35.08 36.96 27.64 46.73 26.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 61 18 18 75 209

14.92 16.58 14.63 16.82 21.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 368 123 107 351 1197

20.72 30.74 10.28 8.94 29.32======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

164

Page 166: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------Right direction 82 140 241 125 588

41.62 44.59 52.39 55.31--------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 56 118 159 68 401

28.43 37.58 34.57 30.09--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 56 60 33 208

29.95 17.83 13.04 14.60--------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 460 226 1197

16.46 26.23 38.43 18.88========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

165

Page 167: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q12. Personal Economy: Better o↵/Worse o↵

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 6 5 6 23 7 10 15 72

9.52 4.85 6.19 6.37 5.69 4.31 6.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 23 31 27 73 22 50 26 252

36.51 30.10 27.84 20.22 17.89 21.55 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

166

Page 168: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About the same 16 50 45 152 52 97 97 50925.40 48.54 46.39 42.11 42.28 41.81 44.50

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 7 14 16 72 35 57 53 254

11.11 13.59 16.49 19.94 28.46 24.57 24.31------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 6 3 3 26 4 18 27 87

9.52 2.91 3.09 7.20 3.25 7.76 12.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 0 0 15 3 0 0 23

7.94 0.00 0.00 4.16 2.44 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 361 123 232 218 1197

5.26 8.60 8.10 30.16 10.28 19.38 18.21==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 16 23 32 71

6.11 6.37 5.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 81 73 97 251

30.92 20.22 16.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 110 152 245 507

41.98 42.11 42.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 38 72 145 255

14.50 19.94 25.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

167

Page 169: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 12 26 50 88

4.58 7.20 8.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 15 4 24

1.91 4.16 0.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 573 1196

21.91 30.18 47.91============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 7 10 4 7 3 4 69

13.28 6.19 8.40 3.57 5.79 2.42 1.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 68 25 38 16 21 22 56 246

26.56 22.12 31.93 14.29 17.36 17.74 18.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 95 52 53 50 49 64 126 489

37.11 46.02 44.54 44.64 40.50 51.61 42.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 38 21 15 32 34 27 73 240

14.84 18.58 12.61 28.57 28.10 21.77 24.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 14 7 3 9 10 7 38 88

5.47 6.19 2.52 8.04 8.26 5.65 12.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 1 0 1 0 1 1 11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

168

Page 170: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

2.73 0.88 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.81 0.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 298 1143

22.40 9.89 10.41 9.80 10.59 10.85 26.07=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 51 4 14 69

10.45 3.57 2.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 131 16 100 247

26.84 14.29 18.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 200 50 239 489

40.98 44.64 43.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 74 32 134 240

15.16 28.57 24.63------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 24 9 55 88

4.92 8.04 10.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 1 2 11

1.64 0.89 0.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 544 1144

42.66 9.79 47.55==============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

169

Page 171: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 12 49 7 4 72

4.98 10.79 2.64 1.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 40 138 46 27 251

16.60 30.40 17.36 11.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 112 177 109 109 507

46.47 38.99 41.13 45.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 46 71 79 60 256

19.09 15.64 29.81 25.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 31 15 24 19 89

12.86 3.30 9.06 7.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 4 0 20 24

0.00 0.88 0.00 8.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 265 239 1199

20.10 37.86 22.10 19.93======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

170

Page 172: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 0 19 18 9 22 4 72

0.00 5.38 5.42 7.89 8.94 3.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 6 56 64 25 66 34 251

15.38 15.86 19.28 21.93 26.83 29.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 9 156 146 46 97 52 506

23.08 44.19 43.98 40.35 39.43 45.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 19 78 74 19 49 17 256

48.72 22.10 22.29 16.67 19.92 14.78-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 1 40 18 12 11 8 90

2.56 11.33 5.42 10.53 4.47 6.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 12 3 1 0 24

10.26 1.13 3.61 2.63 0.41 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 39 353 332 114 246 115 1199

3.25 29.44 27.69 9.51 20.52 9.59=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

171

Page 173: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

A lot better off 17 17 6 14 17 719.09 6.39 4.55 4.95 5.17

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 38 54 23 63 74 252

20.32 20.30 17.42 22.26 22.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 61 121 74 106 145 507

32.62 45.49 56.06 37.46 44.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 35 55 22 75 66 253

18.72 20.68 16.67 26.50 20.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 29 14 6 24 18 91

15.51 5.26 4.55 8.48 5.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 5 1 1 9 23

3.74 1.88 0.76 0.35 2.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 132 283 329 1197

15.62 22.22 11.03 23.64 27.49================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 24 27 19 1 0 0 0 71

3.33 17.31 6.99 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 159 28 52 5 1 4 2 251

22.08 17.95 19.12 22.73 33.33 28.57 14.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

172

Page 174: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 305 60 119 15 0 6 3 508

42.36 38.46 43.75 68.18 0.00 42.86 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 167 29 47 1 1 4 7 256

23.19 18.59 17.28 4.55 33.33 28.57 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 52 8 28 0 1 0 2 91

7.22 5.13 10.29 0.00 33.33 0.00 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 4 7 0 0 0 0 24

1.81 2.56 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 720 156 272 22 3 14 14 1201

59.95 12.99 22.65 1.83 0.25 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 3 2 2 30 0 71

5.24 13.04 1.32 3.12 11.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 129 3 32 5 70 12 251

19.88 13.04 21.05 7.81 27.56 21.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 285 5 66 30 87 33 506

43.91 21.74 43.42 46.88 34.25 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 142 6 40 19 40 10 257

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

173

Page 175: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

21.88 26.09 26.32 29.69 15.75 17.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 53 3 12 7 14 1 90

8.17 13.04 7.89 10.94 5.51 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 3 0 1 13 1 24

0.92 13.04 0.00 1.56 5.12 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 23 152 64 254 57 1199

54.13 1.92 12.68 5.34 21.18 4.75================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 39 32 71

6.94 5.02------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 128 123 251

22.78 19.28------------------------------------------------------About the same 245 263 508

43.59 41.22------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 101 155 256

17.97 24.29------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 40 50 90

7.12 7.84------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

174

Page 176: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 9 15 241.60 2.35

------------------------------------------------------Total 562 638 1200

46.83 53.17======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 30 31 10 71

8.40 5.25 4.02----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 93 123 35 251

26.05 20.85 14.06----------------------------------------------------------------About the same 142 259 106 507

39.78 43.90 42.57----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 61 130 65 256

17.09 22.03 26.10----------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 28 36 26 90

7.84 6.10 10.44----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 11 7 21

0.84 1.86 2.81----------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 249 1196

29.85 49.33 20.82

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

175

Page 177: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 13 31 2 14 12 72

5.18 8.42 1.64 12.96 3.42-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 55 79 27 22 68 251

21.91 21.47 22.13 20.37 19.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 105 144 47 49 163 508

41.83 39.13 38.52 45.37 46.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 49 87 29 14 77 256

19.52 23.64 23.77 12.96 21.94-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 23 21 14 8 24 90

9.16 5.71 11.48 7.41 6.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 6 3 1 7 23

2.39 1.63 2.46 0.93 1.99-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 351 1200

20.92 30.67 10.17 9.00 29.25===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

176

Page 178: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 15 35 19 2 71

7.65 11.15 4.11 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 55 66 105 26 252

28.06 21.02 22.73 11.45---------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 71 134 192 110 507

36.22 42.68 41.56 48.46---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 29 48 111 67 255

14.80 15.29 24.03 29.52---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 9 25 34 22 90

4.59 7.96 7.36 9.69---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 6 1 0 24

8.67 1.91 0.22 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 314 462 227 1199

16.35 26.19 38.53 18.93=====================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

177

Page 179: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Elections

Q13. 2014 Senate Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 3 1 6 49 64 164 141 428

4.76 0.97 6.25 13.61 52.03 70.69 64.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 38 71 53 112 8 8 9 299

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

178

Page 180: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

60.32 68.93 55.21 31.11 6.50 3.45 4.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 2 4 0 19 14 12 11 62

3.17 3.88 0.00 5.28 11.38 5.17 5.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 3 7 8 2 1 6 30

4.76 2.91 7.29 2.22 1.63 0.43 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 0 4 10 8 22 18 64

3.17 0.00 4.17 2.78 6.50 9.48 8.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 15 24 26 162 27 25 32 311

23.81 23.30 27.08 45.00 21.95 10.78 14.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 123 232 217 1194

5.28 8.63 8.04 30.15 10.30 19.43 18.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 10 49 368 427

3.80 13.61 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 162 112 26 300

61.60 31.11 4.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 6 19 38 63

2.28 5.28 6.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

179

Page 181: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Emily Sanchez 13 8 9 304.94 2.22 1.57

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 10 48 65

2.66 2.78 8.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 65 162 84 311

24.71 45.00 14.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 573 1196

21.99 30.10 47.91==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 7 6 4 15 70 64 248 414

2.75 5.22 3.36 13.51 58.33 51.61 83.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 172 46 67 5 2 2 1 295

67.45 40.00 56.30 4.50 1.67 1.61 0.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 2 5 5 15 19 14 2 62

0.78 4.35 4.20 13.51 15.83 11.29 0.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 8 10 4 2 0 3 30

1.18 6.96 8.40 3.60 1.67 0.00 1.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 1 2 12 13 13 16 62

1.96 0.87 1.68 10.81 10.83 10.48 5.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

180

Page 182: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 66 49 31 60 14 31 28 279

25.88 42.61 26.05 54.05 11.67 25.00 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 115 119 111 120 124 298 1142

22.33 10.07 10.42 9.72 10.51 10.86 26.09=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 17 15 382 414

3.48 13.51 70.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 285 5 5 295

58.40 4.50 0.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 12 15 35 62

2.46 13.51 6.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 21 4 4 29

4.30 3.60 0.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 12 43 62

1.43 10.81 7.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 146 60 73 279

29.92 54.05 13.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 542 1141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

181

Page 183: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.77 9.73 47.50====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 161 12 173 83 429

67.08 2.64 65.28 34.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 3 289 0 8 300

1.25 63.52 0.00 3.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 7 13 34 9 63

2.92 2.86 12.83 3.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 4 21 3 3 31

1.67 4.62 1.13 1.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 12 10 33 10 65

5.00 2.20 12.45 4.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 53 110 22 126 311

22.08 24.18 8.30 52.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 455 265 239 1199

20.02 37.95 22.10 19.93============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

182

Page 184: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 11 125 118 45 81 49 429

26.83 35.41 35.65 39.82 32.79 42.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 2 71 79 28 78 42 300

4.88 20.11 23.87 24.78 31.58 36.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 6 10 19 1 20 8 64

14.63 2.83 5.74 0.88 8.10 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 2 9 6 5 9 1 32

4.88 2.55 1.81 4.42 3.64 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 21 18 7 13 3 64

4.88 5.95 5.44 6.19 5.26 2.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 18 117 91 27 46 11 310

43.90 33.14 27.49 23.89 18.62 9.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 331 113 247 114 1199

3.42 29.44 27.61 9.42 20.60 9.51=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

183

Page 185: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 91 127 44 85 80 427

48.66 47.92 33.59 30.04 24.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 31 35 32 86 116 300

16.58 13.21 24.43 30.39 35.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 5 13 10 15 18 61

2.67 4.91 7.63 5.30 5.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 1 7 8 12 31

1.60 0.38 5.34 2.83 3.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 20 18 4 10 12 64

10.70 6.79 3.05 3.53 3.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 37 71 34 79 91 312

19.79 26.79 25.95 27.92 27.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 283 329 1195

15.65 22.18 10.96 23.68 27.53============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 346 7 56 4 3 7 5 428

48.19 4.55 20.59 18.18 75.00 53.85 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

184

Page 186: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

David Alameel 151 67 68 9 0 1 3 29921.03 43.51 25.00 40.91 0.00 7.69 20.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 44 4 13 1 0 0 2 64

6.13 2.60 4.78 4.55 0.00 0.00 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 10 2 14 1 0 3 0 30

1.39 1.30 5.15 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 39 5 13 2 1 0 5 65

5.43 3.25 4.78 9.09 25.00 0.00 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 128 69 108 5 0 2 0 312

17.83 44.81 39.71 22.73 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 272 22 4 13 15 1198

59.93 12.85 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 281 4 38 36 56 14 429

43.36 16.67 25.17 55.38 22.05 24.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 137 1 57 10 75 19 299

21.14 4.17 37.75 15.38 29.53 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 44 0 5 2 11 1 63

6.79 0.00 3.31 3.08 4.33 1.75

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

185

Page 187: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 15 0 1 0 13 2 31

2.31 0.00 0.66 0.00 5.12 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 36 1 6 5 17 0 65

5.56 4.17 3.97 7.69 6.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 135 18 44 12 82 21 312

20.83 75.00 29.14 18.46 32.28 36.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 151 65 254 57 1199

54.05 2.00 12.59 5.42 21.18 4.75======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 216 213 429

38.50 33.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 149 151 300

26.56 23.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 39 25 64

6.95 3.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 17 13 30

3.03 2.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 27 38 65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

186

Page 188: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.81 5.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 113 199 312

20.14 31.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 639 1200

46.75 53.25============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 95 208 124 427

26.54 35.31 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 125 149 26 300

34.92 25.30 10.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 12 36 15 63

3.35 6.11 6.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 18 13 0 31

5.03 2.21 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 10 42 13 65

2.79 7.13 5.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 98 141 70 309

27.37 23.94 28.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

187

Page 189: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 358 589 248 119529.96 49.29 20.75

======================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 86 131 45 20 147 429

34.26 35.60 37.19 18.52 41.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 66 98 22 43 71 300

26.29 26.63 18.18 39.81 20.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 14 16 5 5 24 64

5.58 4.35 4.13 4.63 6.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 10 9 4 4 3 30

3.98 2.45 3.31 3.70 0.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 15 17 6 7 20 65

5.98 4.62 4.96 6.48 5.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 60 97 39 29 87 312

23.90 26.36 32.23 26.85 24.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 121 108 352 1200

20.92 30.67 10.08 9.00 29.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

188

Page 190: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 30 95 182 122 429

15.15 30.35 39.48 53.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 38 86 124 52 300

19.19 27.48 26.90 22.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 14 21 27 2 64

7.07 6.71 5.86 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 14 7 6 4 31

7.07 2.24 1.30 1.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 13 12 26 13 64

6.57 3.83 5.64 5.70-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 92 96 35 312

44.95 29.39 20.82 15.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 461 228 1200

16.50 26.08 38.42 19.00===========================================================================================

Q14. 2014 Governor Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

189

Page 191: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 47 83 73 141 20 10 8 382

75.81 80.58 76.04 39.61 16.13 4.33 3.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 2 5 5 64 71 195 179 521

3.23 4.85 5.21 17.98 57.26 84.42 82.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 1 1 1 8 9 9 6 35

1.61 0.97 1.04 2.25 7.26 3.90 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 0 3 5 0 1 4 14

1.61 0.00 3.12 1.40 0.00 0.43 1.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

190

Page 192: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Someone else 1 1 2 14 6 2 5 311.61 0.97 2.08 3.93 4.84 0.87 2.30

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 10 13 12 124 18 14 15 206

16.13 12.62 12.50 34.83 14.52 6.06 6.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 356 124 231 217 1189

5.21 8.66 8.07 29.94 10.43 19.43 18.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 204 141 38 383

77.86 39.61 6.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 12 64 445 521

4.58 17.98 77.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 2 8 25 35

0.76 2.25 4.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 5 5 5 15

1.91 1.40 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 4 14 12 30

1.53 3.93 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 35 124 47 206

13.36 34.83 8.22

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

191

Page 193: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 356 572 1190

22.02 29.92 48.07==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 189 69 87 12 4 8 5 374

74.41 60.53 73.73 10.62 3.28 6.45 1.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 11 15 5 28 101 86 268 514

4.33 13.16 4.24 24.78 82.79 69.35 89.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 4 4 2 12 7 4 3 36

1.57 3.51 1.69 10.62 5.74 3.23 1.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 5 1 1 4 2 0 2 15

1.97 0.88 0.85 3.54 1.64 0.00 0.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 1 9 5 2 2 6 30

1.97 0.88 7.63 4.42 1.64 1.61 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 40 24 14 52 6 24 14 174

15.75 21.05 11.86 46.02 4.92 19.35 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 118 113 122 124 298 1143

22.22 9.97 10.32 9.89 10.67 10.85 26.07=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

192

Page 194: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 345 12 16 373

71.13 10.62 2.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 30 28 454 512

6.19 24.78 83.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 10 12 13 35

2.06 10.62 2.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 4 15

1.44 3.54 0.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 14 5 10 29

2.89 4.42 1.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 79 52 44 175

16.29 46.02 8.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 541 1139

42.58 9.92 47.50====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

193

Page 195: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 18 345 2 18 383

7.44 76.50 0.75 7.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 171 24 237 92 524

70.66 5.32 89.10 38.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 8 8 10 10 36

3.31 1.77 3.76 4.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 9 3 2 15

0.41 2.00 1.13 0.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 8 14 4 6 32

3.31 3.10 1.50 2.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 36 51 10 108 205

14.88 11.31 3.76 45.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 451 266 236 1195

20.25 37.74 22.26 19.75============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 6 98 89 45 94 51 383

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

194

Page 196: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.00 27.92 26.81 39.82 38.37 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 18 145 154 43 115 49 524

45.00 41.31 46.39 38.05 46.94 42.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 2 8 9 4 4 7 34

5.00 2.28 2.71 3.54 1.63 6.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 0 6 7 1 1 1 16

0.00 1.71 2.11 0.88 0.41 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 17 2 6 4 0 31

5.00 4.84 0.60 5.31 1.63 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 12 77 71 14 27 6 207

30.00 21.94 21.39 12.39 11.02 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 332 113 245 114 1195

3.35 29.37 27.78 9.46 20.50 9.54=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 47 37 110 148 384

22.22 17.74 28.68 39.01 45.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 105 155 58 106 95 519

55.56 58.49 44.96 37.59 28.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

195

Page 197: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Kathy Glass 7 6 6 9 9 373.70 2.26 4.65 3.19 2.74

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 4 3 0 7 15

0.53 1.51 2.33 0.00 2.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 8 3 15 1 32

2.65 3.02 2.33 5.32 0.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 29 45 22 42 68 206

15.34 16.98 17.05 14.89 20.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 129 282 328 1193

15.84 22.21 10.81 23.64 27.49============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 185 83 95 11 0 6 3 383

25.87 54.25 35.06 50.00 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 410 8 80 5 4 6 10 523

57.34 5.23 29.52 22.73 100.00 46.15 71.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 20 7 6 1 0 0 1 35

2.80 4.58 2.21 4.55 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 2 1 0 0 0 14

0.98 2.61 0.74 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

196

Page 198: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 13 2 14 2 0 0 0 31

1.82 1.31 5.17 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 80 49 74 2 0 1 0 206

11.19 32.03 27.31 9.09 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 153 271 22 4 13 14 1192

59.98 12.84 22.73 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 178 7 68 14 90 25 382

27.51 30.43 45.95 21.88 35.57 44.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 340 7 52 43 71 11 524

52.55 30.43 35.14 67.19 28.06 19.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 20 0 2 0 12 2 36

3.09 0.00 1.35 0.00 4.74 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 6 0 1 0 4 3 14

0.93 0.00 0.68 0.00 1.58 5.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 16 0 0 1 13 0 30

2.47 0.00 0.00 1.56 5.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 87 9 25 6 63 15 205

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

197

Page 199: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

13.45 39.13 16.89 9.38 24.90 26.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 148 64 253 56 1191

54.32 1.93 12.43 5.37 21.24 4.70======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 181 202 383

32.26 31.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 259 265 524

46.17 41.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 22 13 35

3.92 2.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 8 7 15

1.43 1.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 17 15 32

3.03 2.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 74 132 206

13.19 20.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 634 1195

46.95 53.05============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

198

Page 200: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 153 190 40 383

42.86 32.15 16.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 272 142 523

30.53 46.02 58.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 9 20 7 36

2.52 3.38 2.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 6 8 1 15

1.68 1.35 0.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 11 6 14 31

3.08 1.02 5.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 69 95 40 204

19.33 16.07 16.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 244 1192

29.95 49.58 20.47======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

199

Page 201: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 82 128 33 62 78 383

32.67 34.97 27.27 57.94 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 112 149 59 29 176 525

44.62 40.71 48.76 27.10 50.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 5 10 3 7 11 36

1.99 2.73 2.48 6.54 3.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 2 8 0 0 5 15

0.80 2.19 0.00 0.00 1.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 5 4 0 15 31

2.79 1.37 3.31 0.00 4.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 43 66 22 9 66 206

17.13 18.03 18.18 8.41 18.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 121 107 351 1196

20.99 30.60 10.12 8.95 29.35============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

200

Page 202: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Wendy Davis 49 116 156 62 38324.62 36.94 34.06 27.56

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 57 113 222 133 525

28.64 35.99 48.47 59.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 11 12 11 2 36

5.53 3.82 2.40 0.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 3 1 15

3.52 1.27 0.66 0.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 7 14 4 32

3.52 2.23 3.06 1.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 68 62 52 23 205

34.17 19.75 11.35 10.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 314 458 225 1196

16.64 26.25 38.29 18.81===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

201

Page 203: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q15. 2014 Lieutenant Governor Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 45 69 60 112 15 8 5 314

71.43 66.99 61.86 31.20 12.00 3.45 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 1 1 6 57 63 191 170 489

1.59 0.97 6.19 15.88 50.40 82.33 78.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

202

Page 204: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Robert Butler 0 2 3 8 15 5 13 460.00 1.94 3.09 2.23 12.00 2.16 6.02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 1 4 4 6 2 0 1 18

1.59 3.88 4.12 1.67 1.60 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 3 1 3 21 6 13 6 53

4.76 0.97 3.09 5.85 4.80 5.60 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 26 21 155 24 15 21 275

20.63 25.24 21.65 43.18 19.20 6.47 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 359 125 232 216 1195

5.27 8.62 8.12 30.04 10.46 19.41 18.08============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 174 112 28 314

66.41 31.20 4.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 8 57 424 489

3.05 15.88 74.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 5 8 33 46

1.91 2.23 5.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 9 6 2 17

3.44 1.67 0.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

203

Page 205: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 6 21 25 52

2.29 5.85 4.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 60 155 60 275

22.90 43.18 10.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 359 572 1193

21.96 30.09 47.95==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 169 44 77 3 4 7 6 310

66.27 38.94 65.25 2.65 3.33 5.65 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 11 9 7 30 93 79 250 479

4.31 7.96 5.93 26.55 77.50 63.71 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 6 7 4 4 12 3 10 46

2.35 6.19 3.39 3.54 10.00 2.42 3.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 4 5 4 3 0 1 0 17

1.57 4.42 3.39 2.65 0.00 0.81 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 6 7 2 13 1 6 14 49

2.35 6.19 1.69 11.50 0.83 4.84 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 59 41 24 60 10 28 18 240

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

204

Page 206: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

23.14 36.28 20.34 53.10 8.33 22.58 6.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 113 120 124 298 1141

22.35 9.90 10.34 9.90 10.52 10.87 26.12=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 290 3 17 310

59.92 2.65 3.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 27 30 422 479

5.58 26.55 77.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 16 4 25 45

3.31 3.54 4.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 13 3 1 17

2.69 2.65 0.18----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 14 13 22 49

2.89 11.50 4.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 124 60 56 240

25.62 53.10 10.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 113 543 1140

42.46 9.91 47.63====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

205

Page 207: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 14 288 2 10 314

5.86 63.72 0.75 4.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 142 26 237 87 492

59.41 5.75 88.76 36.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 16 16 9 5 46

6.69 3.54 3.37 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 1 13 2 1 17

0.42 2.88 0.75 0.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 23 17 3 8 51

9.62 3.76 1.12 3.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 43 92 14 127 276

17.99 20.35 5.24 53.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 452 267 238 1196

19.98 37.79 22.32 19.90============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

206

Page 208: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 5 74 70 36 88 41 314

12.50 21.02 21.21 31.86 35.77 35.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 17 132 137 42 111 51 490

42.50 37.50 41.52 37.17 45.12 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 1 10 16 7 6 6 46

2.50 2.84 4.85 6.19 2.44 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 2 5 8 1 2 0 18

5.00 1.42 2.42 0.88 0.81 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 0 21 14 5 6 5 51

0.00 5.97 4.24 4.42 2.44 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 15 110 85 22 33 11 276

37.50 31.25 25.76 19.47 13.41 9.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 330 113 246 114 1195

3.35 29.46 27.62 9.46 20.59 9.54=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

207

Page 209: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Leticia Van de Putte 28 35 31 98 122 31414.81 13.16 23.48 35.00 37.20

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 96 148 62 98 83 487

50.79 55.64 46.97 35.00 25.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 9 8 9 8 12 46

4.76 3.01 6.82 2.86 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 5 1 3 1 8 18

2.65 0.38 2.27 0.36 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 18 13 4 10 8 53

9.52 4.89 3.03 3.57 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 33 61 23 65 95 277

17.46 22.93 17.42 23.21 28.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 266 132 280 328 1195

15.82 22.26 11.05 23.43 27.45============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 159 57 84 9 0 4 0 313

22.18 37.01 31.00 42.86 0.00 28.57 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 386 18 61 6 3 6 11 491

53.84 11.69 22.51 28.57 75.00 42.86 78.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

208

Page 210: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 32 4 8 1 0 1 0 46

4.46 2.60 2.95 4.76 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 6 4 5 1 0 0 0 16

0.84 2.60 1.85 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 24 12 15 0 1 0 0 52

3.35 7.79 5.54 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 110 59 98 4 0 3 3 277

15.34 38.31 36.16 19.05 0.00 21.43 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 271 21 4 14 14 1195

60.00 12.89 22.68 1.76 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 151 3 60 14 69 17 314

23.37 13.04 40.00 21.88 27.17 28.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 324 9 50 35 57 15 490

50.15 39.13 33.33 54.69 22.44 25.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 25 0 2 1 14 4 46

3.87 0.00 1.33 1.56 5.51 6.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 6 0 1 0 9 2 18

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

209

Page 211: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.93 0.00 0.67 0.00 3.54 3.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 26 0 4 3 16 3 52

4.02 0.00 2.67 4.69 6.30 5.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 114 11 33 11 89 18 276

17.65 47.83 22.00 17.19 35.04 30.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 150 64 254 59 1196

54.01 1.92 12.54 5.35 21.24 4.93======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 151 163 314

26.92 25.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 254 237 491

45.28 37.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 22 23 45

3.92 3.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 9 8 17

1.60 1.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 20 32 52

3.57 5.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

210

Page 212: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 105 172 27718.72 27.09

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 635 1196

46.91 53.09============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 138 143 33 314

38.66 24.28 13.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 100 257 133 490

28.01 43.63 54.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 14 20 11 45

3.92 3.40 4.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 3 14 0 17

0.84 2.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 19 19 14 52

5.32 3.23 5.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 83 136 54 273

23.25 23.09 22.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 245 1191

29.97 49.45 20.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

211

Page 213: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 69 100 31 47 67 314

27.60 27.17 25.83 43.52 19.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 96 152 49 28 166 491

38.40 41.30 40.83 25.93 47.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 7 19 2 7 10 45

2.80 5.16 1.67 6.48 2.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 4 8 2 1 3 18

1.60 2.17 1.67 0.93 0.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 19 5 9 5 14 52

7.60 1.36 7.50 4.63 4.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 55 84 27 20 90 276

22.00 22.83 22.50 18.52 25.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 120 108 350 1196

20.90 30.77 10.03 9.03 29.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

212

Page 214: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 32 94 132 56 314

16.16 29.94 28.76 24.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 48 99 218 126 491

24.24 31.53 47.49 55.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 9 16 17 4 46

4.55 5.10 3.70 1.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 11 4 1 1 17

5.56 1.27 0.22 0.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 9 15 21 7 52

4.55 4.78 4.58 3.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 86 70 33 278

44.95 27.39 15.25 14.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 459 227 1198

16.53 26.21 38.31 18.95===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

213

Page 215: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q16. 2014 Attorney General Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 40 67 55 117 15 15 15 324

63.49 65.05 57.29 32.59 12.10 6.52 6.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 2 1 8 55 59 193 163 481

3.17 0.97 8.33 15.32 47.58 83.91 75.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

214

Page 216: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Jamie Balagia 0 5 4 7 9 1 4 300.00 4.85 4.17 1.95 7.26 0.43 1.84

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 6 3 2 11 5 0 7 34

9.52 2.91 2.08 3.06 4.03 0.00 3.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 15 27 27 169 36 21 28 323

23.81 26.21 28.12 47.08 29.03 9.13 12.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 359 124 230 217 1192

5.29 8.64 8.05 30.12 10.40 19.30 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 162 117 45 324

61.60 32.59 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 11 55 415 481

4.18 15.32 72.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 10 7 15 32

3.80 1.95 2.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 11 11 12 34

4.18 3.06 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 69 169 85 323

26.24 47.08 14.86

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

215

Page 217: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 572 1194

22.03 30.07 47.91==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 165 54 69 13 7 3 10 321

64.45 47.79 57.50 11.71 5.83 2.42 3.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 6 7 6 28 96 77 250 470

2.34 6.19 5.00 25.23 80.00 62.10 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 7 3 3 7 6 4 1 31

2.73 2.65 2.50 6.31 5.00 3.23 0.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 8 4 7 4 0 2 9 34

3.12 3.54 5.83 3.60 0.00 1.61 3.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 70 45 35 59 11 38 28 286

27.34 39.82 29.17 53.15 9.17 30.65 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 120 111 120 124 298 1142

22.42 9.89 10.51 9.72 10.51 10.86 26.09=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

216

Page 218: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 287 13 20 320

58.81 11.71 3.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 19 28 423 470

3.89 25.23 78.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 13 7 11 31

2.66 6.31 2.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 19 4 10 33

3.89 3.60 1.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 150 59 77 286

30.74 53.15 14.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 541 1140

42.81 9.74 47.46====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 20 289 7 10 326

8.26 63.80 2.64 4.18

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

217

Page 219: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 146 16 232 89 483

60.33 3.53 87.55 37.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 4 12 9 7 32

1.65 2.65 3.40 2.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 10 21 2 0 33

4.13 4.64 0.75 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 62 115 15 133 325

25.62 25.39 5.66 55.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 453 265 239 1199

20.18 37.78 22.10 19.93============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 5 84 71 40 84 41 325

12.20 23.86 21.32 35.40 34.15 36.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 14 137 129 43 110 50 483

34.15 38.92 38.74 38.05 44.72 44.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 2 4 13 2 6 4 31

4.88 1.14 3.90 1.77 2.44 3.57---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 0 11 13 1 5 3 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

218

Page 220: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 3.12 3.90 0.88 2.03 2.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 20 116 107 27 41 14 325

48.78 32.95 32.13 23.89 16.67 12.50---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 333 113 246 112 1197

3.43 29.41 27.82 9.44 20.55 9.36=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 39 44 34 83 124 324

20.97 16.60 25.56 29.54 37.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 98 143 56 97 84 478

52.69 53.96 42.11 34.52 25.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 1 2 8 7 13 31

0.54 0.75 6.02 2.49 3.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 8 2 5 12 7 34

4.30 0.75 3.76 4.27 2.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 40 74 30 82 99 325

21.51 27.92 22.56 29.18 30.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 133 281 327 1192

15.60 22.23 11.16 23.57 27.43============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

219

Page 221: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 163 68 73 12 0 4 4 324

22.73 44.16 26.84 52.17 0.00 30.77 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 377 5 76 5 4 6 10 483

52.58 3.25 27.94 21.74 100.00 46.15 71.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 22 3 6 1 0 0 0 32

3.07 1.95 2.21 4.35 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 14 9 10 0 0 0 0 33

1.95 5.84 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 141 69 107 5 0 3 0 325

19.67 44.81 39.34 21.74 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 272 23 4 13 14 1197

59.90 12.87 22.72 1.92 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

220

Page 222: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 152 2 51 13 91 17 326

23.53 8.33 33.77 20.00 35.69 29.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 324 5 48 36 59 11 483

50.15 20.83 31.79 55.38 23.14 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 23 0 2 0 6 1 32

3.56 0.00 1.32 0.00 2.35 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 13 1 2 0 12 5 33

2.01 4.17 1.32 0.00 4.71 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 134 16 48 16 87 23 324

20.74 66.67 31.79 24.62 34.12 40.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 24 151 65 255 57 1198

53.92 2.00 12.60 5.43 21.29 4.76======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 159 165 324

28.39 25.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 258 225 483

46.07 35.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

221

Page 223: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Jamie Balagia 14 17 312.50 2.67

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 21 13 34

3.75 2.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 108 217 325

19.29 34.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 560 637 1197

46.78 53.22============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 123 157 45 325

34.45 26.61 18.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 101 251 130 482

28.29 42.54 52.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 11 17 4 32

3.08 2.88 1.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 17 10 6 33

4.76 1.69 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 105 155 61 321

29.41 26.27 24.80

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

222

Page 224: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 246 1193

29.92 49.46 20.62======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 69 102 28 41 84 324

27.60 27.87 22.95 38.32 24.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 100 139 56 24 163 482

40.00 37.98 45.90 22.43 46.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 4 14 3 4 7 32

1.60 3.83 2.46 3.74 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 6 19 1 6 1 33

2.40 5.19 0.82 5.61 0.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 71 92 34 32 95 324

28.40 25.14 27.87 29.91 27.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 122 107 350 1195

20.92 30.63 10.21 8.95 29.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

223

Page 225: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 52 90 126 57 325

26.26 28.75 27.45 25.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 44 102 205 131 482

22.22 32.59 44.66 57.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 6 8 17 0 31

3.03 2.56 3.70 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 5 16 13 0 34

2.53 5.11 2.83 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 91 97 98 38 324

45.96 30.99 21.35 16.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 459 226 1196

16.56 26.17 38.38 18.90===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

224

Page 226: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q17. 2014 Comptroller Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 42 60 57 109 10 8 10 296

70.00 58.82 58.16 30.36 8.00 3.48 4.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 0 0 6 38 43 153 140 380

0.00 0.00 6.12 10.58 34.40 66.52 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

225

Page 227: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ben Sanders 2 3 1 13 10 13 16 583.33 2.94 1.02 3.62 8.00 5.65 7.34

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 2 4 8 1 0 2 21

6.67 1.96 4.08 2.23 0.80 0.00 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 12 37 30 191 61 56 50 437

20.00 36.27 30.61 53.20 48.80 24.35 22.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 102 98 359 125 230 218 1192

5.03 8.56 8.22 30.12 10.49 19.30 18.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 159 109 27 295

60.92 30.36 4.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 6 38 336 380

2.30 10.58 58.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 6 13 39 58

2.30 3.62 6.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 8 3 22

4.21 2.23 0.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 79 191 167 437

30.27 53.20 29.20

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

226

Page 228: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 359 572 1192

21.90 30.12 47.99==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 169 43 59 4 4 4 8 291

66.27 37.72 50.43 3.57 3.28 3.23 2.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 4 3 4 19 63 59 223 375

1.57 2.63 3.42 16.96 51.64 47.58 75.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 7 9 7 10 10 8 4 55

2.75 7.89 5.98 8.93 8.20 6.45 1.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 2 5 5 2 3 0 21

1.57 1.75 4.27 4.46 1.64 2.42 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 71 57 42 74 43 50 61 398

27.84 50.00 35.90 66.07 35.25 40.32 20.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 117 112 122 124 296 1140

22.37 10.00 10.26 9.82 10.70 10.88 25.96=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

227

Page 229: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 271 4 16 291

55.76 3.57 2.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 11 19 345 375

2.26 16.96 63.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 23 10 23 56

4.73 8.93 4.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 5 5 21

2.26 4.46 0.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 170 74 153 397

34.98 66.07 28.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 542 1140

42.63 9.82 47.54====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 10 275 5 6 296

4.13 60.84 1.89 2.53

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

228

Page 230: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 144 8 175 55 382

59.50 1.77 66.29 23.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 6 20 22 10 58

2.48 4.42 8.33 4.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 14 3 1 22

1.65 3.10 1.14 0.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 78 135 59 165 437

32.23 29.87 22.35 69.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 452 264 237 1195

20.25 37.82 22.09 19.83============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 3 73 74 35 73 38 296

7.32 20.68 22.42 30.97 29.80 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 8 114 103 31 83 44 383

19.51 32.29 31.21 27.43 33.88 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 4 8 15 7 16 7 57

9.76 2.27 4.55 6.19 6.53 6.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 0 5 6 3 4 4 22

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

229

Page 231: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.42 1.82 2.65 1.63 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 26 153 132 37 69 21 438

63.41 43.34 40.00 32.74 28.16 18.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 330 113 245 114 1196

3.43 29.52 27.59 9.45 20.48 9.53=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 29 43 34 82 107 295

15.51 16.35 25.95 29.29 32.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 85 131 34 70 62 382

45.45 49.81 25.95 25.00 18.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 9 9 12 12 15 57

4.81 3.42 9.16 4.29 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 6 2 3 7 22

2.14 2.28 1.53 1.07 2.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 60 74 49 113 137 433

32.09 28.14 37.40 40.36 41.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 131 280 328 1189

15.73 22.12 11.02 23.55 27.59============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

230

Page 232: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 141 68 71 10 0 4 1 295

19.72 44.16 26.10 45.45 0.00 30.77 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 318 2 50 3 2 1 6 382

44.48 1.30 18.38 13.64 50.00 7.69 46.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 33 11 8 2 0 2 1 57

4.62 7.14 2.94 9.09 0.00 15.38 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 13 5 3 0 0 0 0 21

1.82 3.25 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 210 68 140 7 2 6 5 438

29.37 44.16 51.47 31.82 50.00 46.15 38.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 154 272 22 4 13 13 1193

59.93 12.91 22.80 1.84 0.34 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

231

Page 233: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 142 2 57 9 73 12 295

21.98 8.70 37.75 13.85 28.85 21.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 253 9 35 33 46 8 384

39.16 39.13 23.18 50.77 18.18 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 40 0 2 2 11 3 58

6.19 0.00 1.32 3.08 4.35 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 8 0 3 0 8 3 22

1.24 0.00 1.99 0.00 3.16 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 203 12 54 21 115 31 436

31.42 52.17 35.76 32.31 45.45 54.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 151 65 253 57 1195

54.06 1.92 12.64 5.44 21.17 4.77======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 142 153 295

25.45 24.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 194 189 383

34.77 29.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

232

Page 234: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ben Sanders 34 24 586.09 3.77

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 10 21

1.97 1.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 177 260 437

31.72 40.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 558 636 1194

46.73 53.27============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 120 143 32 295

33.52 24.32 12.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 68 201 113 382

18.99 34.18 45.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 22 28 8 58

6.15 4.76 3.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 10 2 23

3.07 1.70 0.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 137 206 92 435

38.27 35.03 37.25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

233

Page 235: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 588 247 1193

30.01 49.29 20.70======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 64 95 21 45 70 295

25.70 25.82 17.21 42.45 19.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 76 108 35 28 136 383

30.52 29.35 28.69 26.42 38.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 10 27 7 4 10 58

4.02 7.34 5.74 3.77 2.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 5 9 1 1 6 22

2.01 2.45 0.82 0.94 1.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 94 129 58 28 129 438

37.75 35.05 47.54 26.42 36.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 122 106 351 1196

20.82 30.77 10.20 8.86 29.35============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

234

Page 236: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 43 80 122 50 295

21.72 25.48 26.64 22.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 38 75 165 105 383

19.19 23.89 36.03 46.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 10 25 19 3 57

5.05 7.96 4.15 1.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 6 9 7 0 22

3.03 2.87 1.53 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 101 125 145 67 438

51.01 39.81 31.66 29.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 458 225 1195

16.57 26.28 38.33 18.83===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

235

Page 237: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q18. 2014 Land Commissioner Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 40 64 49 107 13 11 12 296

63.49 62.14 51.04 29.72 10.40 4.76 5.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 2 1 10 63 59 151 147 433

3.17 0.97 10.42 17.50 47.20 65.37 67.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

236

Page 238: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Justin Knight 3 1 7 15 15 18 17 764.76 0.97 7.29 4.17 12.00 7.79 7.80

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 5 7 6 11 1 1 5 36

7.94 6.80 6.25 3.06 0.80 0.43 2.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 30 24 164 37 50 37 355

20.63 29.13 25.00 45.56 29.60 21.65 16.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 125 231 218 1196

5.27 8.61 8.03 30.10 10.45 19.31 18.23============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 153 107 35 295

58.62 29.72 6.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 13 63 358 434

4.98 17.50 62.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 11 15 49 75

4.21 4.17 8.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 17 11 7 35

6.51 3.06 1.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 67 164 124 355

25.67 45.56 21.64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

237

Page 239: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 573 1194

21.86 30.15 47.99==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 172 48 63 3 6 2 0 294

67.72 42.11 52.50 2.68 4.96 1.61 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 5 13 4 30 65 74 232 423

1.97 11.40 3.33 26.79 53.72 59.68 78.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 7 7 5 15 16 12 10 72

2.76 6.14 4.17 13.39 13.22 9.68 3.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 8 4 12 3 4 0 4 35

3.15 3.51 10.00 2.68 3.31 0.00 1.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 62 42 36 61 30 36 51 318

24.41 36.84 30.00 54.46 24.79 29.03 17.17-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 120 112 121 124 297 1142

22.24 9.98 10.51 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

238

Page 240: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 283 3 8 294

57.99 2.68 1.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 22 30 372 424

4.51 26.79 68.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 19 15 38 72

3.89 13.39 7.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 24 3 8 35

4.92 2.68 1.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 140 61 117 318

28.69 54.46 21.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 543 1143

42.69 9.80 47.51====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 8 278 1 8 295

3.32 61.37 0.38 3.38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

239

Page 241: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 162 23 177 73 435

67.22 5.08 66.79 30.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 16 17 34 8 75

6.64 3.75 12.83 3.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 2 25 3 5 35

0.83 5.52 1.13 2.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 53 110 50 143 356

21.99 24.28 18.87 60.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 453 265 237 1196

20.15 37.88 22.16 19.82============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 6 75 67 39 70 38 295

15.00 21.25 20.18 34.21 28.46 33.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 15 128 132 34 88 39 436

37.50 36.26 39.76 29.82 35.77 34.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 2 16 21 3 20 12 74

5.00 4.53 6.33 2.63 8.13 10.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 0 5 7 8 9 6 35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

240

Page 242: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.42 2.11 7.02 3.66 5.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 17 129 105 30 59 18 358

42.50 36.54 31.63 26.32 23.98 15.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 353 332 114 246 113 1198

3.34 29.47 27.71 9.52 20.53 9.43=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 39 38 32 79 108 296

20.86 14.29 24.43 28.11 32.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 85 128 51 87 84 435

45.45 48.12 38.93 30.96 25.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 12 18 15 13 12 70

6.42 6.77 11.45 4.63 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 6 6 2 7 14 35

3.21 2.26 1.53 2.49 4.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 45 76 31 95 110 357

24.06 28.57 23.66 33.81 33.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 281 328 1193

15.67 22.30 10.98 23.55 27.49============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

241

Page 243: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 137 70 78 9 0 0 1 295

19.08 45.16 28.57 39.13 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 342 10 67 6 4 4 3 436

47.63 6.45 24.54 26.09 100.00 33.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 43 6 19 2 0 0 5 75

5.99 3.87 6.96 8.70 0.00 0.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 24 4 4 1 0 2 0 35

3.34 2.58 1.47 4.35 0.00 16.67 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 172 65 105 5 0 6 5 358

23.96 41.94 38.46 21.74 0.00 50.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 273 23 4 12 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.77 1.92 0.33 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

242

Page 244: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 129 4 53 15 76 19 296

19.97 17.39 34.87 23.08 29.80 32.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 290 5 48 38 45 10 436

44.89 21.74 31.58 58.46 17.65 17.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 49 1 2 1 19 3 75

7.59 4.35 1.32 1.54 7.45 5.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 18 0 6 0 10 2 36

2.79 0.00 3.95 0.00 3.92 3.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 160 13 43 11 105 24 356

24.77 56.52 28.29 16.92 41.18 41.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 152 65 255 58 1199

53.88 1.92 12.68 5.42 21.27 4.84======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 134 161 295

23.89 25.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 215 221 436

38.32 34.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

243

Page 245: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Justin Knight 49 26 758.73 4.08

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 18 17 35

3.21 2.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 145 212 357

25.85 33.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 637 1198

46.83 53.17============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 130 131 34 295

36.41 22.24 13.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 95 225 115 435

26.61 38.20 46.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 44 14 75

4.76 7.47 5.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 7 22 6 35

1.96 3.74 2.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 108 167 79 354

30.25 28.35 31.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

244

Page 246: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 248 1194

29.90 49.33 20.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 65 90 23 44 72 294

26.00 24.52 18.70 40.74 20.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 96 128 45 20 147 436

38.40 34.88 36.59 18.52 42.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 23 11 8 16 75

6.80 6.27 8.94 7.41 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 1 18 1 5 10 35

0.40 4.90 0.81 4.63 2.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 71 108 43 31 105 358

28.40 29.43 34.96 28.70 30.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 123 108 350 1198

20.87 30.63 10.27 9.02 29.22============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

245

Page 247: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 37 80 131 49 297

18.69 25.56 28.42 21.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 45 84 181 126 436

22.73 26.84 39.26 55.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 30 22 5 74

8.59 9.58 4.77 2.20-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 9 12 12 2 35

4.55 3.83 2.60 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 90 107 115 45 357

45.45 34.19 24.95 19.82-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 461 227 1199

16.51 26.11 38.45 18.93===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

246

Page 248: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q19. 2014 Commissioner of Agriculture Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 36 61 51 103 13 8 9 281

59.02 58.65 53.68 28.77 10.57 3.48 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 1 3 4 38 44 154 140 384

1.64 2.88 4.21 10.61 35.77 66.96 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

247

Page 249: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rocky Palmquist 0 2 3 14 9 10 14 520.00 1.92 3.16 3.91 7.32 4.35 6.42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 11 6 8 20 2 10 8 65

18.03 5.77 8.42 5.59 1.63 4.35 3.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 32 29 183 55 48 47 407

21.31 30.77 30.53 51.12 44.72 20.87 21.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 95 358 123 230 218 1189

5.13 8.75 7.99 30.11 10.34 19.34 18.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 147 103 30 280

56.76 28.77 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 8 38 338 384

3.09 10.61 59.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 5 14 33 52

1.93 3.91 5.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 25 20 20 65

9.65 5.59 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 74 183 149 406

28.57 51.12 26.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

248

Page 250: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 358 570 1187

21.82 30.16 48.02==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 151 41 66 4 7 5 5 279

59.45 36.94 55.46 3.60 5.79 4.03 1.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 9 1 2 17 64 64 217 374

3.54 0.90 1.68 15.32 52.89 51.61 73.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 2 7 3 12 12 9 6 51

0.79 6.31 2.52 10.81 9.92 7.26 2.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 17 7 14 10 6 4 7 65

6.69 6.31 11.76 9.01 4.96 3.23 2.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 75 55 34 68 32 42 61 367

29.53 49.55 28.57 61.26 26.45 33.87 20.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 119 111 121 124 296 1136

22.36 9.77 10.48 9.77 10.65 10.92 26.06=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

249

Page 251: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 258 4 16 278

53.09 3.60 2.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 12 17 345 374

2.47 15.32 63.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 13 12 27 52

2.67 10.81 5.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 38 10 17 65

7.82 9.01 3.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 165 68 135 368

33.95 61.26 25.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 111 540 1137

42.74 9.76 47.49====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 12 256 3 9 280

5.00 56.89 1.13 3.80

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

250

Page 252: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 127 10 184 65 386

52.92 2.22 69.43 27.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 5 14 27 6 52

2.08 3.11 10.19 2.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 20 37 7 2 66

8.33 8.22 2.64 0.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 76 133 44 155 408

31.67 29.56 16.60 65.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 450 265 237 1192

20.13 37.75 22.23 19.88============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 8 68 69 28 73 35 281

20.00 19.32 20.85 25.69 29.92 30.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 9 108 111 34 86 39 387

22.50 30.68 33.53 31.19 35.25 34.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 4 12 11 1 15 8 51

10.00 3.41 3.32 0.92 6.15 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 0 14 14 16 13 8 65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

251

Page 253: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 3.98 4.23 14.68 5.33 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 19 150 126 30 57 24 406

47.50 42.61 38.07 27.52 23.36 21.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 109 244 114 1190

3.36 29.58 27.82 9.16 20.50 9.58=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 30 37 26 83 104 280

16.30 14.02 19.85 29.75 31.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 84 119 37 77 68 385

45.65 45.08 28.24 27.60 20.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 3 6 11 12 16 48

1.63 2.27 8.40 4.30 4.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 9 20 12 7 17 65

4.89 7.58 9.16 2.51 5.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 58 82 45 100 122 407

31.52 31.06 34.35 35.84 37.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 264 131 279 327 1185

15.53 22.28 11.05 23.54 27.59============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

252

Page 254: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 134 58 71 10 0 4 4 281

18.77 37.91 26.10 50.00 0.00 30.77 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 326 9 43 1 3 1 4 387

45.66 5.88 15.81 5.00 75.00 7.69 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 25 3 16 1 1 0 5 51

3.50 1.96 5.88 5.00 25.00 0.00 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 39 11 15 0 0 0 0 65

5.46 7.19 5.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 190 72 127 8 0 8 2 407

26.61 47.06 46.69 40.00 0.00 61.54 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 153 272 20 4 13 15 1191

59.95 12.85 22.84 1.68 0.34 1.09 1.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

253

Page 255: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 127 2 53 14 67 18 281

19.84 8.33 34.87 21.54 26.59 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 257 5 41 32 42 8 385

40.16 20.83 26.97 49.23 16.67 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 39 0 3 0 8 1 51

6.09 0.00 1.97 0.00 3.17 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 33 3 6 2 16 6 66

5.16 12.50 3.95 3.08 6.35 10.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 184 14 49 17 119 24 407

28.75 58.33 32.24 26.15 47.22 42.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 640 24 152 65 252 57 1190

53.78 2.02 12.77 5.46 21.18 4.79======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 134 146 280

24.06 23.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 195 191 386

35.01 30.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

254

Page 256: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rocky Palmquist 33 19 525.92 3.00

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 34 31 65

6.10 4.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 161 246 407

28.90 38.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 557 633 1190

46.81 53.19============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 113 130 37 280

31.83 22.11 15.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 75 202 109 386

21.13 34.35 44.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 16 28 8 52

4.51 4.76 3.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 22 37 6 65

6.20 6.29 2.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 129 191 84 404

36.34 32.48 34.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

255

Page 257: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 355 588 244 1187

29.91 49.54 20.56======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 64 86 18 46 66 280

26.02 23.37 14.75 42.99 19.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 68 114 39 16 149 386

27.64 30.98 31.97 14.95 42.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 11 12 11 5 13 52

4.47 3.26 9.02 4.67 3.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 14 26 4 10 11 65

5.69 7.07 3.28 9.35 3.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 89 130 50 30 108 407

36.18 35.33 40.98 28.04 31.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 246 368 122 107 347 1190

20.67 30.92 10.25 8.99 29.16============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

256

Page 258: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 30 85 124 41 280

15.31 27.33 27.02 18.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 38 66 169 113 386

19.39 21.22 36.82 50.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 11 15 22 4 52

5.61 4.82 4.79 1.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 22 17 15 12 66

11.22 5.47 3.27 5.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 95 128 129 55 407

48.47 41.16 28.10 24.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 311 459 225 1191

16.46 26.11 38.54 18.89===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

257

Page 259: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q20. 2014 Railroad Commission Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 0 1 6 42 43 139 145 376

0.00 0.96 6.32 11.80 34.68 61.23 67.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 38 67 54 101 8 9 10 287

62.30 64.42 56.84 28.37 6.45 3.96 4.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

258

Page 260: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mark Miller 2 3 3 18 15 19 14 743.28 2.88 3.16 5.06 12.10 8.37 6.48

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 8 7 6 19 3 1 6 50

13.11 6.73 6.32 5.34 2.42 0.44 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 26 26 176 55 59 41 396

21.31 25.00 27.37 49.44 44.35 25.99 18.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 95 356 124 227 216 1183

5.16 8.79 8.03 30.09 10.48 19.19 18.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 7 42 327 376

2.71 11.80 57.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 158 101 27 286

61.24 28.37 4.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 8 18 48 74

3.10 5.06 8.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 21 19 11 51

8.14 5.34 1.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 64 176 155 395

24.81 49.44 27.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

259

Page 261: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 258 356 568 1182

21.83 30.12 48.05==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 3 4 4 18 64 59 215 367

1.18 3.60 3.45 16.22 53.78 47.97 72.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 166 47 55 6 5 4 2 285

65.35 42.34 47.41 5.41 4.20 3.25 0.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 8 5 5 14 12 11 15 70

3.15 4.50 4.31 12.61 10.08 8.94 5.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 9 5 13 5 4 4 5 45

3.54 4.50 11.21 4.50 3.36 3.25 1.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 68 50 39 68 34 45 59 363

26.77 45.05 33.62 61.26 28.57 36.59 19.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 116 111 119 123 296 1130

22.48 9.82 10.27 9.82 10.53 10.88 26.19=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

260

Page 262: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 11 18 339 368

2.29 16.22 62.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 268 6 11 285

55.72 5.41 2.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 18 14 38 70

3.74 12.61 7.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 27 5 14 46

5.61 4.50 2.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 157 68 137 362

32.64 61.26 25.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 481 111 539 1131

42.53 9.81 47.66====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 123 7 184 65 379

51.90 1.56 69.96 27.66

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

261

Page 263: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 7 268 5 7 287

2.95 59.82 1.90 2.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 21 17 24 11 73

8.86 3.79 9.13 4.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 9 29 4 8 50

3.80 6.47 1.52 3.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 77 127 46 144 394

32.49 28.35 17.49 61.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 448 263 235 1183

20.03 37.87 22.23 19.86============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 9 103 109 30 88 40 379

21.95 29.51 33.44 26.55 35.63 36.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 3 75 70 30 67 42 287

7.32 21.49 21.47 26.55 27.13 37.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 5 18 18 7 15 11 74

12.20 5.16 5.52 6.19 6.07 9.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 3 16 11 11 8 2 51

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

262

Page 264: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.32 4.58 3.37 9.73 3.24 1.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 21 137 118 35 69 16 396

51.22 39.26 36.20 30.97 27.94 14.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 349 326 113 247 111 1187

3.45 29.40 27.46 9.52 20.81 9.35=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 79 124 39 68 67 377

42.93 47.33 30.00 24.29 20.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 33 35 33 85 102 288

17.93 13.36 25.38 30.36 31.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 9 16 11 21 14 71

4.89 6.11 8.46 7.50 4.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 2 12 9 11 16 50

1.09 4.58 6.92 3.93 4.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 61 75 38 95 126 395

33.15 28.63 29.23 33.93 38.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 262 130 280 325 1181

15.58 22.18 11.01 23.71 27.52============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

263

Page 265: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 320 2 44 2 4 2 5 379

44.94 1.31 16.48 9.09 100.00 16.67 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 142 63 69 9 0 1 4 288

19.94 41.18 25.84 40.91 0.00 8.33 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 40 10 17 2 0 0 3 72

5.62 6.54 6.37 9.09 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 17 8 22 1 0 2 0 50

2.39 5.23 8.24 4.55 0.00 16.67 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 193 70 115 8 0 7 2 395

27.11 45.75 43.07 36.36 0.00 58.33 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 712 153 267 22 4 12 14 1184

60.14 12.92 22.55 1.86 0.34 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

264

Page 266: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 262 3 36 31 39 7 378

40.81 15.00 23.84 47.69 15.54 12.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 125 2 61 8 77 15 288

19.47 10.00 40.40 12.31 30.68 26.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 46 0 5 2 18 3 74

7.17 0.00 3.31 3.08 7.17 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 31 0 4 4 7 5 51

4.83 0.00 2.65 6.15 2.79 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 178 15 45 20 110 27 395

27.73 75.00 29.80 30.77 43.82 47.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 20 151 65 251 57 1186

54.13 1.69 12.73 5.48 21.16 4.81======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 195 184 379

35.14 29.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 144 143 287

25.95 22.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

265

Page 267: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mark Miller 46 28 748.29 4.44

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 19 31 50

3.42 4.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 151 245 396

27.21 38.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 555 631 1186

46.80 53.20============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 72 202 104 378

20.34 34.59 42.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 129 131 28 288

36.44 22.43 11.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 19 43 12 74

5.37 7.36 4.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 13 28 8 49

3.67 4.79 3.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 121 180 92 393

34.18 30.82 37.70

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

266

Page 268: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 354 584 244 1182

29.95 49.41 20.64======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 69 105 42 20 142 378

27.94 28.69 35.29 18.87 40.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 63 84 25 42 74 288

25.51 22.95 21.01 39.62 21.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 12 33 7 8 14 74

4.86 9.02 5.88 7.55 4.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 8 20 6 9 7 50

3.24 5.46 5.04 8.49 2.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 95 124 39 27 110 395

38.46 33.88 32.77 25.47 31.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 247 366 119 106 347 1185

20.84 30.89 10.04 8.95 29.28============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

267

Page 269: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 33 70 166 110 379

16.67 22.80 36.32 49.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 39 82 118 48 287

19.70 26.71 25.82 21.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 21 20 28 5 74

10.61 6.51 6.13 2.24-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 13 10 19 8 50

6.57 3.26 4.16 3.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 92 125 126 52 395

46.46 40.72 27.57 23.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 307 457 223 1185

16.71 25.91 38.57 18.82===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

268

Page 270: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q21. 2014 Generic Texas Legislature Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 55 91 77 181 17 17 21 459

88.71 88.35 79.38 50.28 13.71 7.33 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 2 0 11 78 73 200 184 548

3.23 0.00 11.34 21.67 58.87 86.21 85.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

269

Page 271: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought about it enoug 5 12 9 101 34 15 11 1878.06 11.65 9.28 28.06 27.42 6.47 5.09

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 360 124 232 216 1194

5.19 8.63 8.12 30.15 10.39 19.43 18.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 223 181 55 459

84.79 50.28 9.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 14 78 457 549

5.32 21.67 79.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 26 101 60 187

9.89 28.06 10.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 572 1195

22.01 30.13 47.87==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

270

Page 272: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 236 94 101 16 3 3 0 453

92.55 82.46 84.87 14.16 2.48 2.42 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 3 3 5 34 103 100 289 537

1.18 2.63 4.20 30.09 85.12 80.65 96.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 16 17 13 63 15 21 9 154

6.27 14.91 10.92 55.75 12.40 16.94 3.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 113 121 124 298 1144

22.29 9.97 10.40 9.88 10.58 10.84 26.05=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 431 16 7 454

88.32 14.16 1.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 11 34 492 537

2.25 30.09 90.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 46 63 45 154

9.43 55.75 8.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 544 1145

42.62 9.87 47.51====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

271

Page 273: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 8 429 4 17 458

3.32 94.91 1.50 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 214 5 242 90 551

88.80 1.11 90.98 37.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 19 18 20 131 188

7.88 3.98 7.52 55.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 266 238 1197

20.13 37.76 22.22 19.88============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 10 122 121 52 103 51 459

25.00 34.66 36.45 46.02 42.04 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 25 156 147 48 116 58 550

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

272

Page 274: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

62.50 44.32 44.28 42.48 47.35 50.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 5 74 64 13 26 5 187

12.50 21.02 19.28 11.50 10.61 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 332 113 245 114 1196

3.34 29.43 27.76 9.45 20.48 9.53=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 54 68 53 125 159 459

29.03 25.56 40.15 44.33 48.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 106 165 62 112 101 546

56.99 62.03 46.97 39.72 30.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 26 33 17 45 68 189

13.98 12.41 12.88 15.96 20.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 266 132 282 328 1194

15.58 22.28 11.06 23.62 27.47============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

273

Page 275: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 188 130 118 14 0 6 3 459

26.15 84.42 43.38 63.64 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 434 4 87 7 4 4 11 551

60.36 2.60 31.99 31.82 100.00 30.77 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 97 20 67 1 0 3 0 188

13.49 12.99 24.63 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 154 272 22 4 13 14 1198

60.02 12.85 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 204 6 73 15 133 29 460

31.48 26.09 48.34 23.08 52.36 50.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 355 11 56 38 81 9 550

54.78 47.83 37.09 58.46 31.89 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 6 22 12 40 19 188

13.73 26.09 14.57 18.46 15.75 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 254 57 1198

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

274

Page 276: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.09 1.92 12.60 5.43 21.20 4.76======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 215 244 459

38.26 38.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 272 279 551

48.40 43.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 75 114 189

13.35 17.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 562 637 1199

46.87 53.13============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 189 219 51 459

52.94 37.18 20.56

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

275

Page 277: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 112 282 156 550

31.37 47.88 62.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 56 88 41 185

15.69 14.94 16.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 248 1194

29.90 49.33 20.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 99 149 40 70 102 460

39.76 40.49 32.52 64.81 29.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 114 155 59 23 200 551

45.78 42.12 47.97 21.30 56.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 36 64 24 15 49 188

14.46 17.39 19.51 13.89 13.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 123 108 351 1199

20.77 30.69 10.26 9.01 29.27============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

276

Page 278: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 91 125 183 61 460

45.96 39.81 39.70 26.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 67 124 220 140 551

33.84 39.49 47.72 61.95-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 40 65 58 25 188

20.20 20.70 12.58 11.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 226 1199

16.51 26.19 38.45 18.85===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

277

Page 279: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q22. Tea Party Support

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 2 0 10 53 46 76 52 239

3.23 0.00 10.31 14.72 37.10 32.76 23.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 56 91 80 173 19 14 21 454

90.32 88.35 82.47 48.06 15.32 6.03 9.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

278

Page 280: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Tea Party candidate 0 1 0 24 24 104 112 2650.00 0.97 0.00 6.67 19.35 44.83 51.61

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 11 7 110 35 38 32 237

6.45 10.68 7.22 30.56 28.23 16.38 14.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 360 124 232 217 1195

5.19 8.62 8.12 30.13 10.38 19.41 18.16==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 12 53 174 239

4.58 14.72 30.37--------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 227 173 54 454

86.64 48.06 9.42--------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 1 24 240 265

0.38 6.67 41.88--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 110 105 237

8.40 30.56 18.32--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 573 1195

21.92 30.13 47.95====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

279

Page 281: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 4 7 1 15 19 56 131 233

1.56 6.09 0.85 13.27 15.70 45.16 43.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 237 88 103 12 3 5 0 448

92.58 76.52 87.29 10.62 2.48 4.03 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 0 1 0 32 67 37 124 261

0.00 0.87 0.00 28.32 55.37 29.84 41.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 19 14 54 32 26 43 203

5.86 16.52 11.86 47.79 26.45 20.97 14.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 115 118 113 121 124 298 1145

22.36 10.04 10.31 9.87 10.57 10.83 26.03===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 12 15 206 233

2.45 13.27 37.94----------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

280

Page 282: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Democratic candidate 428 12 8 44887.53 10.62 1.47

----------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 1 32 229 262

0.20 28.32 42.17----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 54 100 202

9.82 47.79 18.42----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 113 543 1145

42.71 9.87 47.42======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 241 0 0 0 241

100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 0 454 0 0 454

0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 0 0 266 0 266

0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 238 238

0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 266 238 1199

20.10 37.86 22.19 19.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

281

Page 283: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==============================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 8 90 67 16 33 28 242

19.51 25.50 20.18 14.04 13.41 24.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 14 118 119 53 103 47 454

34.15 33.43 35.84 46.49 41.87 40.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 10 68 70 22 72 25 267

24.39 19.26 21.08 19.30 29.27 21.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 77 76 23 38 15 238

21.95 21.81 22.89 20.18 15.45 13.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 246 115 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.49 20.48 9.58=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

282

Page 284: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Republican candidate 48 68 27 55 42 24025.53 25.66 20.45 19.50 12.80

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 55 57 54 128 161 455

29.26 21.51 40.91 45.39 49.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 44 86 30 45 58 263

23.40 32.45 22.73 15.96 17.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 54 21 54 67 237

21.81 20.38 15.91 19.15 20.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 282 328 1195

15.73 22.18 11.05 23.60 27.45========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 165 3 65 5 0 2 0 240

22.98 1.92 23.90 23.81 0.00 14.29 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 195 126 114 12 0 5 3 455

27.16 80.77 41.91 57.14 0.00 35.71 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 208 4 35 2 3 3 10 265

28.97 2.56 12.87 9.52 100.00 21.43 71.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 150 23 58 2 0 4 1 238

20.89 14.74 21.32 9.52 0.00 28.57 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

283

Page 285: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 156 272 21 3 14 14 1198

59.93 13.02 22.70 1.75 0.25 1.17 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 135 10 27 18 46 4 240

20.83 43.48 17.88 27.69 18.04 7.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 200 6 79 13 131 26 455

30.86 26.09 52.32 20.00 51.37 45.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 189 2 22 12 33 9 267

29.17 8.70 14.57 18.46 12.94 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 124 5 23 22 45 18 237

19.14 21.74 15.23 33.85 17.65 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 255 57 1199

54.05 1.92 12.59 5.42 21.27 4.75========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

284

Page 286: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Republican candidate 98 143 241

17.47 22.38----------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 207 248 455

36.90 38.81----------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 181 85 266

32.26 13.30----------------------------------------------Don't know 75 163 238

13.37 25.51----------------------------------------------Total 561 639 1200

46.75 53.25==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 62 111 67 240

17.42 18.81 27.02--------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 180 222 52 454

50.56 37.63 20.97--------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 53 150 62 265

14.89 25.42 25.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

285

Page 287: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 61 107 67 235

17.13 18.14 27.02--------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 248 1194

29.82 49.41 20.77========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 56 66 29 17 73 241

22.31 17.98 23.77 15.89 20.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 100 156 35 60 103 454

39.84 42.51 28.69 56.07 29.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 50 77 27 18 94 266

19.92 20.98 22.13 16.82 26.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 68 31 12 81 237

17.93 18.53 25.41 11.21 23.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 107 351 1198

20.95 30.63 10.18 8.93 29.30===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

286

Page 288: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 43 65 81 52 241

21.83 20.70 17.57 22.91-------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 86 126 180 63 455

43.65 40.13 39.05 27.75-------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 23 55 127 60 265

11.68 17.52 27.55 26.43-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 68 73 52 238

22.84 21.66 15.84 22.91-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 227 1199

16.43 26.19 38.45 18.93=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

287

Page 289: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q23. Tea Party Influence

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 44 78 63 135 29 19 16 384

69.84 75.00 64.95 37.40 23.39 8.23 7.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 6 6 10 43 34 122 110 331

9.52 5.77 10.31 11.91 27.42 52.81 51.16-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

288

Page 290: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The right amount of influence 5 5 11 78 35 67 54 2557.94 4.81 11.34 21.61 28.23 29.00 25.12

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 15 13 105 26 23 35 225

12.70 14.42 13.40 29.09 20.97 9.96 16.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 361 124 231 215 1195

5.27 8.70 8.12 30.21 10.38 19.33 17.99===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 185 135 64 384

70.34 37.40 11.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 21 43 267 331

7.98 11.91 46.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 21 78 156 255

7.98 21.61 27.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 105 84 225

13.69 29.09 14.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 361 571 1195

22.01 30.21 47.78=============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

289

Page 291: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 161 56 93 20 9 23 15 377

62.89 49.56 78.15 17.86 7.44 18.55 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 17 15 9 27 64 51 143 326

6.64 13.27 7.56 24.11 52.89 41.13 48.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 31 16 9 29 36 28 96 245

12.11 14.16 7.56 25.89 29.75 22.58 32.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 26 8 36 12 22 43 194

18.36 23.01 6.72 32.14 9.92 17.74 14.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 297 1142

22.42 9.89 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 310 20 47 377

63.39 17.86 8.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

290

Page 292: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Too little influence 41 27 258 3268.38 24.11 47.60

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 56 29 160 245

11.45 25.89 29.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 82 36 77 195

16.77 32.14 14.21-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 48 314 0 22 384

19.92 69.16 0.00 9.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 45 38 208 42 333

18.67 8.37 78.49 17.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 89 50 55 61 255

36.93 11.01 20.75 25.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 52 2 113 226

24.48 11.45 0.75 47.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 265 238 1198

20.12 37.90 22.12 19.87

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

291

Page 293: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 6 84 97 42 94 61 384

15.00 23.93 29.22 36.84 38.06 53.98------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 16 82 95 36 72 31 332

40.00 23.36 28.61 31.58 29.15 27.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 7 93 60 23 54 18 255

17.50 26.50 18.07 20.18 21.86 15.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 92 80 13 27 3 226

27.50 26.21 24.10 11.40 10.93 2.65------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 332 114 247 113 1197

3.34 29.32 27.74 9.52 20.63 9.44==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

292

Page 294: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Too much influence 38 60 37 113 137 38520.11 22.64 28.03 40.21 41.64

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 56 99 36 62 76 329

29.63 37.36 27.27 22.06 23.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 48 59 36 65 47 255

25.40 22.26 27.27 23.13 14.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 47 23 41 69 227

24.87 17.74 17.42 14.59 20.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 132 281 329 1196

15.80 22.16 11.04 23.49 27.51=================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~AC Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 212 76 79 7 0 7 3 384

29.57 49.03 29.04 33.33 0.00 53.85 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 240 14 60 4 3 3 9 333

33.47 9.03 22.06 19.05 75.00 23.08 64.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 148 25 67 10 1 2 1 254

20.64 16.13 24.63 47.62 25.00 15.38 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 117 40 66 0 0 1 1 225

16.32 25.81 24.26 0.00 0.00 7.69 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

293

Page 295: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 155 272 21 4 13 14 1196

59.95 12.96 22.74 1.76 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 184 3 66 13 94 24 384

28.40 12.50 44.00 20.00 37.01 42.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 222 6 31 20 43 10 332

34.26 25.00 20.67 30.77 16.93 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 141 4 21 19 61 9 255

21.76 16.67 14.00 29.23 24.02 15.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 101 11 32 13 56 14 227

15.59 45.83 21.33 20.00 22.05 24.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 150 65 254 57 1198

54.09 2.00 12.52 5.43 21.20 4.76=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

294

Page 296: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 183 201 384

32.62 31.60-------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 183 149 332

32.62 23.43-------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 135 120 255

24.06 18.87-------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 166 226

10.70 26.10-------------------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13=======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 139 193 51 383

39.04 32.71 20.65-----------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 78 173 81 332

21.91 29.32 32.79-----------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 61 136 58 255

17.13 23.05 23.48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

295

Page 297: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 88 57 223

21.91 14.92 23.08-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 247 1193

29.84 49.46 20.70=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 89 125 30 56 83 383

35.60 34.06 24.59 52.34 23.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 68 97 36 13 117 331

27.20 26.43 29.51 12.15 33.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 51 73 30 22 81 257

20.40 19.89 24.59 20.56 23.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 72 26 16 69 225

16.80 19.62 21.31 14.95 19.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 107 350 1196

20.90 30.69 10.20 8.95 29.26====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

296

Page 298: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 51 98 168 67 384

25.76 31.21 36.52 29.52----------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 44 65 150 73 332

22.22 20.70 32.61 32.16----------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 43 71 87 55 256

21.72 22.61 18.91 24.23----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 80 55 32 227

30.30 25.48 11.96 14.10----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 460 227 1199

16.51 26.19 38.37 18.93======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

297

Page 299: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q25. 2016 Republican Presidential Primary Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 0 0 2 12 11 66 84 175

0.00 0.00 18.18 20.34 14.10 32.84 46.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 1 0 0 5 4 17 13 40

33.33 0.00 0.00 8.47 5.13 8.46 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

298

Page 300: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rand Paul 0 0 0 6 7 22 13 480.00 0.00 0.00 10.17 8.97 10.95 7.14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 0 1 0 6 10 9 10 36

0.00 100.00 0.00 10.17 12.82 4.48 5.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 0 8 12 11 6 37

0.00 0.00 0.00 13.56 15.38 5.47 3.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 0 3 2 2 4 11

0.00 0.00 0.00 5.08 2.56 1.00 2.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 0 0 0 0 3 10 8 21

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.85 4.98 4.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 0 0 1 3 22 3 29

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 3.85 10.95 1.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 0 2 3 2 10 0 17

0.00 0.00 18.18 5.08 2.56 4.98 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 0 0 1 1 1 3 8

66.67 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.28 0.50 1.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 0 0 7 2 7 10 19 45

0.00 0.00 63.64 3.39 8.97 4.98 10.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about i 0 0 0 12 16 21 19 68

0.00 0.00 0.00 20.34 20.51 10.45 10.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 3 1 11 59 78 201 182 535

0.56 0.19 2.06 11.03 14.58 37.57 34.02============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

299

Page 301: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 2 12 160 174

13.33 20.34 34.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 1 5 34 40

6.67 8.47 7.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 6 42 48

0.00 10.17 9.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 1 6 28 35

6.67 10.17 6.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 8 29 37

0.00 13.56 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 3 9 12

0.00 5.08 1.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 0 0 21 21

0.00 0.00 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 1 29 30

0.00 1.69 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 2 3 11 16

13.33 5.08 2.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 1 5 8

13.33 1.69 1.09

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

300

Page 302: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 7 2 36 45

46.67 3.39 7.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 0 12 56 68

0.00 20.34 12.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 15 59 460 534

2.81 11.05 86.14==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 0 0 1 6 43 25 96 171

0.00 0.00 20.00 21.43 43.43 24.51 33.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 0 1 0 0 5 8 26 40

0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 5.05 7.84 9.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 0 0 8 16 7 16 47

0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 16.16 6.86 5.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 1 1 0 2 4 7 19 34

25.00 50.00 0.00 7.14 4.04 6.86 6.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 0 0 4 13 20 37

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.04 12.75 6.99-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

301

Page 303: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.00 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 0 0 0 3 7 11 22

25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.03 6.86 3.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 0 1 0 2 3 24 30

0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 2.02 2.94 8.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 0 1 1 0 5 7 14

0.00 0.00 20.00 3.57 0.00 4.90 2.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 0 0 2 0 4 2 8

0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00 3.92 0.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 2 0 0 3 8 6 25 44

50.00 0.00 0.00 10.71 8.08 5.88 8.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 0 0 2 6 12 17 31 68

0.00 0.00 40.00 21.43 12.12 16.67 10.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 4 2 5 28 99 102 286 526

0.76 0.38 0.95 5.32 18.82 19.39 54.37=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 1 6 164 171

9.09 21.43 33.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

302

Page 304: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rick Perry 1 0 39 409.09 0.00 8.02

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 8 39 47

0.00 28.57 8.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 2 2 30 34

18.18 7.14 6.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 37 37

0.00 0.00 7.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 12 12

0.00 0.00 2.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 0 21 22

9.09 0.00 4.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 1 0 28 29

9.09 0.00 5.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 1 1 13 15

9.09 3.57 2.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 2 5 7

0.00 7.14 1.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 2 3 39 44

18.18 10.71 8.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 2 6 59 67

18.18 21.43 12.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 11 28 486 525

2.10 5.33 92.57====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

303

Page 305: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 35 0 119 22 176

17.33 0.00 50.00 24.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 28 0 3 9 40

13.86 0.00 1.26 10.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 7 0 36 5 48

3.47 0.00 15.13 5.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 18 1 11 5 35

8.91 12.50 4.62 5.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 26 2 3 7 38

12.87 25.00 1.26 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 5 0 7 0 12

2.48 0.00 2.94 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 4 0 14 3 21

1.98 0.00 5.88 3.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 17 0 10 2 29

8.42 0.00 4.20 2.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 15 1 0 0 16

7.43 12.50 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

304

Page 306: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 4 0 1 2 7

1.98 0.00 0.42 2.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 17 2 20 7 46

8.42 25.00 8.40 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 26 2 14 27 69

12.87 25.00 5.88 30.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 202 8 238 89 537

37.62 1.49 44.32 16.57============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 5 43 49 21 44 15 177

38.46 27.74 31.61 47.73 37.93 28.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 2 11 14 3 7 2 39

15.38 7.10 9.03 6.82 6.03 3.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 1 8 11 6 15 7 48

7.69 5.16 7.10 13.64 12.93 13.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 0 7 14 2 6 4 33

0.00 4.52 9.03 4.55 5.17 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 1 12 12 3 9 1 38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

305

Page 307: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.69 7.74 7.74 6.82 7.76 1.89---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 5 3 1 1 2 12

0.00 3.23 1.94 2.27 0.86 3.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 9 5 1 4 0 20

7.69 5.81 3.23 2.27 3.45 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 1 10 4 0 6 8 29

7.69 6.45 2.58 0.00 5.17 15.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 8 2 0 1 6 17

0.00 5.16 1.29 0.00 0.86 11.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 3 1 2 2 0 8

0.00 1.94 0.65 4.55 1.72 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 1 17 14 2 8 4 46

7.69 10.97 9.03 4.55 6.90 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 1 22 26 3 13 4 69

7.69 14.19 16.77 6.82 11.21 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 13 155 155 44 116 53 536

2.43 28.92 28.92 8.21 21.64 9.89=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

306

Page 308: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ted Cruz 31 56 18 37 35 17729.52 34.78 30.00 33.33 35.71

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 6 13 5 11 4 39

5.71 8.07 8.33 9.91 4.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 11 9 6 10 9 45

10.48 5.59 10.00 9.01 9.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 4 10 6 4 12 36

3.81 6.21 10.00 3.60 12.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 3 8 6 11 9 37

2.86 4.97 10.00 9.91 9.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 3 2 0 5 1 11

2.86 1.24 0.00 4.50 1.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 5 7 3 2 5 22

4.76 4.35 5.00 1.80 5.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 6 13 1 9 0 29

5.71 8.07 1.67 8.11 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 6 7 0 0 4 17

5.71 4.35 0.00 0.00 4.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 4 0 1 1 8

1.90 2.48 0.00 0.90 1.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 11 19 2 6 7 45

10.48 11.80 3.33 5.41 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have 17 13 13 15 11 69

16.19 8.07 21.67 13.51 11.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

307

Page 309: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 105 161 60 111 98 53519.63 30.09 11.21 20.75 18.32

============================================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 141 0 23 2 3 2 6 177

32.64 NaN 27.38 50.00 75.00 66.67 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 32 0 8 0 0 0 0 40

7.41 NaN 9.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 39 0 5 0 1 1 3 49

9.03 NaN 5.95 0.00 25.00 33.33 30.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 29 0 5 0 0 0 0 34

6.71 NaN 5.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 31 0 7 0 0 0 0 38

7.18 NaN 8.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 12

1.39 NaN 7.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 19 0 2 0 0 0 0 21

4.40 NaN 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 27 0 2 0 0 0 0 29

6.25 NaN 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

308

Page 310: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 16

1.62 NaN 10.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 8

0.93 NaN 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 40 0 4 1 0 0 0 45

9.26 NaN 4.76 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to 57 0 9 1 0 0 1 68

13.19 NaN 10.71 25.00 0.00 0.00 10.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 432 0 84 4 4 3 10 537

80.45 0.00 15.64 0.74 0.74 0.56 1.86============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 121 0 21 7 22 5 176

33.80 0.00 38.18 20.59 29.73 55.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 23 1 5 4 7 0 40

6.42 12.50 9.09 11.76 9.46 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 37 1 4 1 5 0 48

10.34 12.50 7.27 2.94 6.76 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 19 0 6 5 3 1 34

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

309

Page 311: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.31 0.00 10.91 14.71 4.05 11.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 25 3 3 5 2 1 39

6.98 37.50 5.45 14.71 2.70 11.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 7 0 0 0 5 0 12

1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.76 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 12 0 1 1 5 2 21

3.35 0.00 1.82 2.94 6.76 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 20 0 2 4 4 0 30

5.59 0.00 3.64 11.76 5.41 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 9 0 0 0 8 0 17

2.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.81 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 5 0 2 1 0 0 8

1.40 0.00 3.64 2.94 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 28 2 5 4 6 0 45

7.82 25.00 9.09 11.76 8.11 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 52 1 6 2 7 0 68

14.53 12.50 10.91 5.88 9.46 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 8 55 34 74 9 538

66.54 1.49 10.22 6.32 13.75 1.67======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

310

Page 312: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 103 73 176

37.73 27.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 13 27 40

4.76 10.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 33 15 48

12.09 5.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 18 17 35

6.59 6.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 9 29 38

3.30 10.98----------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 7 4 11

2.56 1.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 15 6 21

5.49 2.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 14 16 30

5.13 6.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 12 5 17

4.40 1.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 5 7

0.73 1.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 23 22 45

8.42 8.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

311

Page 313: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 24 45 698.79 17.05

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 273 264 537

50.84 49.16============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 34 98 45 177

31.78 34.15 31.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 10 17 12 39

9.35 5.92 8.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 5 30 13 48

4.67 10.45 9.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 11 19 4 34

10.28 6.62 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 7 21 10 38

6.54 7.32 6.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 2 8 2 12

1.87 2.79 1.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 5 11 5 21

4.67 3.83 3.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

312

Page 314: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 7 10 13 30

6.54 3.48 9.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 8 8 0 16

7.48 2.79 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 4 2 8

1.87 1.39 1.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 4 22 20 46

3.74 7.67 13.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 39 18 69

11.21 13.59 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 107 287 144 538

19.89 53.35 26.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 35 55 20 1 65 176

33.98 34.16 32.26 3.70 34.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 10 12 6 1 11 40

9.71 7.45 9.68 3.70 5.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 6 8 9 8 17 48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

313

Page 315: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.83 4.97 14.52 29.63 9.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 8 12 5 4 7 36

7.77 7.45 8.06 14.81 3.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 9 11 5 1 11 37

8.74 6.83 8.06 3.70 5.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 1 3 3 0 5 12

0.97 1.86 4.84 0.00 2.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 4 7 1 3 6 21

3.88 4.35 1.61 11.11 3.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 10 6 2 0 12 30

9.71 3.73 3.23 0.00 6.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 3 2 6 3 2 16

2.91 1.24 9.68 11.11 1.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 4 0 2 2 8

0.00 2.48 0.00 7.41 1.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 3 15 0 2 26 46

2.91 9.32 0.00 7.41 13.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to ha 14 26 5 2 22 69

13.59 16.15 8.06 7.41 11.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 103 161 62 27 186 539

19.11 29.87 11.50 5.01 34.51============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

314

Page 316: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 14 44 77 41 176

22.58 36.07 35.32 30.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 9 9 14 8 40

14.52 7.38 6.42 5.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 8 7 26 7 48

12.90 5.74 11.93 5.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 5 7 7 16 35

8.06 5.74 3.21 11.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 5 16 17 38

0.00 4.10 7.34 12.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 1 2 6 2 11

1.61 1.64 2.75 1.47-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 5 9 6 21

1.61 4.10 4.13 4.41-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 5 8 10 7 30

8.06 6.56 4.59 5.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 1 8 8 0 17

1.61 6.56 3.67 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 3 1 4 8

0.00 2.46 0.46 2.94-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

315

Page 317: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mike Huckabee 11 8 16 11 4617.74 6.56 7.34 8.09

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 7 16 28 17 68

11.29 13.11 12.84 12.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 122 218 136 538

11.52 22.68 40.52 25.28===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

316

Page 318: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q26. 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 24 65 41 116 9 8 8 271

46.15 78.31 67.21 65.54 60.00 53.33 47.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 3 2 4 19 0 4 1 33

5.77 2.41 6.56 10.73 0.00 26.67 5.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

317

Page 319: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Elizabeth Warren 22 12 10 17 1 0 2 6442.31 14.46 16.39 9.60 6.67 0.00 11.76

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 8

0.00 1.20 0.00 2.26 0.00 20.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 4

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 6.67 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about i 3 3 6 18 4 0 6 40

5.77 3.61 9.84 10.17 26.67 0.00 35.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 52 83 61 177 15 15 17 420

12.38 19.76 14.52 42.14 3.57 3.57 4.05============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 129 116 26 271

66.15 65.54 50.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 9 19 6 34

4.62 10.73 11.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 44 17 4 65

22.56 9.60 7.84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

318

Page 320: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 4 3 8

0.51 2.26 5.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 3 1 4

0.00 1.69 1.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 18 11 41

6.15 10.17 21.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 177 51 423

46.10 41.84 12.06==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 156 54 47 2 2 4 1 266

66.38 62.79 64.38 20.00 50.00 100.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 17 9 4 3 0 0 1 34

7.23 10.47 5.48 30.00 0.00 0.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 37 10 16 0 1 0 0 64

15.74 11.63 21.92 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

319

Page 321: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 8

2.13 2.33 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4

1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 17 11 6 4 1 0 0 39

7.23 12.79 8.22 40.00 25.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 235 86 73 10 4 4 3 415

56.63 20.72 17.59 2.41 0.96 0.96 0.72=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 257 2 7 266

65.23 20.00 63.64----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 30 3 1 34

7.61 30.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 63 0 1 64

15.99 0.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

320

Page 322: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Andrew Cuomo 7 1 0 81.78 10.00 0.00

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 1 4

0.76 0.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 34 4 1 39

8.63 40.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 394 10 11 415

94.94 2.41 2.65====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 5 253 2 12 272

31.25 65.89 66.67 57.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 4 29 0 2 35

25.00 7.55 0.00 9.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 1 63 0 0 64

6.25 16.41 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 7 0 1 8

0.00 1.82 0.00 4.76

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

321

Page 323: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 4 0 0 0 4

25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 2 32 1 6 41

12.50 8.33 33.33 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 16 384 3 21 424

3.77 90.57 0.71 4.95============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 10 76 70 34 59 23 272

66.67 64.41 63.06 75.56 63.44 52.27---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 1 8 10 2 6 7 34

6.67 6.78 9.01 4.44 6.45 15.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 0 21 15 1 20 7 64

0.00 17.80 13.51 2.22 21.51 15.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 2 1 3 0 3 9

0.00 1.69 0.90 6.67 0.00 6.82---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 3 0 0 2 0 5

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

322

Page 324: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 2.54 0.00 0.00 2.15 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 4 8 15 5 6 4 42

26.67 6.78 13.51 11.11 6.45 9.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 15 118 111 45 93 44 426

3.52 27.70 26.06 10.56 21.83 10.33=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 33 41 35 76 88 273

67.35 62.12 72.92 66.09 60.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 7 6 5 5 11 34

14.29 9.09 10.42 4.35 7.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 4 6 2 22 30 64

8.16 9.09 4.17 19.13 20.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 1 1 0 8

6.12 4.55 2.08 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 4 0 0 0 4

0.00 6.06 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

323

Page 325: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought enough about it to have 2 6 5 11 17 414.08 9.09 10.42 9.57 11.64

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 49 66 48 115 146 424

11.56 15.57 11.32 27.12 34.43============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 103 85 79 3 0 3 0 273

60.59 65.89 73.83 27.27 NaN 42.86 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 9 20 6 0 0 0 0 35

5.29 15.50 5.61 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 42 3 9 7 0 1 3 65

24.71 2.33 8.41 63.64 NaN 14.29 100.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 8

1.76 2.33 1.87 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.00 2.80 9.09 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it t 13 18 8 0 0 3 0 42

7.65 13.95 7.48 0.00 NaN 42.86 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

324

Page 326: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 170 129 107 11 0 7 3 427

39.81 30.21 25.06 2.58 0.00 1.64 0.70============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 120 7 55 14 66 11 273

65.93 70.00 77.46 82.35 55.00 45.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 16 0 3 0 13 2 34

8.79 0.00 4.23 0.00 10.83 8.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 31 0 7 0 20 5 63

17.03 0.00 9.86 0.00 16.67 20.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 0 4 1 3 0 9

0.55 0.00 5.63 5.88 2.50 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 2 3 0 0 0 0 5

1.10 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 0 2 2 18 6 40

6.59 0.00 2.82 11.76 15.00 25.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 182 10 71 17 120 24 424

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

325

Page 327: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.92 2.36 16.75 4.01 28.30 5.66======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 118 154 272

60.51 67.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 22 34

6.15 9.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 38 26 64

19.49 11.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0

0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 5 3 8

2.56 1.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 4 4

0.00 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 22 19 41

11.28 8.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 228 423

46.10 53.90============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

326

Page 328: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 117 127 29 273

66.86 63.82 58.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 11 19 4 34

6.29 9.55 8.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 23 31 10 64

13.14 15.58 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 6 1 8

0.57 3.02 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 1 4

1.71 0.00 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 20 16 5 41

11.43 8.04 10.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 175 199 50 424

41.27 46.93 11.79======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

327

Page 329: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 61 90 25 36 60 272

58.65 72.58 69.44 59.02 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 9 2 6 6 35

11.54 7.26 5.56 9.84 6.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 14 13 8 12 18 65

13.46 10.48 22.22 19.67 18.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 0 0 2 8

2.88 2.42 0.00 0.00 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 0 0 1 4

2.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to ha 11 9 1 7 13 41

10.58 7.26 2.78 11.48 13.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 104 124 36 61 100 425

24.47 29.18 8.47 14.35 23.53============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

328

Page 330: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 34 67 122 49 272

47.89 56.78 70.52 77.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 9 11 2 34

16.90 7.63 6.36 3.17-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 11 20 27 7 65

15.49 16.95 15.61 11.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 3 2 3 8

0.00 2.54 1.16 4.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 5 0 0 5

0.00 4.24 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 14 14 11 2 41

19.72 11.86 6.36 3.17-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 71 118 173 63 425

16.71 27.76 40.71 14.82===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

329

Page 331: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political Figure Favorability Ratings

Q27. Ted Cruz Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 1 2 30 28 131 149 344

4.84 0.97 2.08 8.33 22.58 56.71 68.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 3 7 8 43 40 64 33 198

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

330

Page 332: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.84 6.80 8.33 11.94 32.26 27.71 15.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavora 2 2 4 61 15 16 13 113

3.23 1.94 4.17 16.94 12.10 6.93 6.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 4 7 40 10 6 5 75

4.84 3.88 7.29 11.11 8.06 2.60 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 43 76 65 118 20 8 5 335

69.35 73.79 67.71 32.78 16.13 3.46 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 8 13 10 68 11 6 11 127

12.90 12.62 10.42 18.89 8.87 2.60 5.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 360 124 231 216 1192

5.20 8.64 8.05 30.20 10.40 19.38 18.12============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 30 308 344

2.28 8.33 54.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 18 43 137 198

6.84 11.94 24.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 9 61 44 114

3.42 16.94 7.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

331

Page 333: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat unfavorable 14 40 21 755.32 11.11 3.68

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 185 118 33 336

70.34 32.78 5.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 31 68 27 126

11.79 18.89 4.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 570 1193

22.05 30.18 47.78=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 8 2 0 21 74 40 194 339

3.16 1.75 0.00 18.75 62.18 32.26 65.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 19 19 4 21 26 37 61 187

7.51 16.67 3.36 18.75 21.85 29.84 20.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 24 15 7 25 6 12 17 106

9.49 13.16 5.88 22.32 5.04 9.68 5.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 19 18 8 4 3 14 8 74

7.51 15.79 6.72 3.57 2.52 11.29 2.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 152 48 92 18 5 6 8 329

60.08 42.11 77.31 16.07 4.20 4.84 2.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

332

Page 334: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 31 12 8 23 5 15 9 103

12.25 10.53 6.72 20.54 4.20 12.10 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 253 114 119 112 119 124 297 1138

22.23 10.02 10.46 9.84 10.46 10.90 26.10============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 10 21 309 340

2.06 18.75 56.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 42 21 125 188

8.64 18.75 23.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 46 25 36 107

9.47 22.32 6.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 4 25 74

9.26 3.57 4.60-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 292 18 19 329

60.08 16.07 3.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 51 23 29 103

10.49 20.54 5.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 543 1141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

333

Page 335: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.59 9.82 47.59===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 76 9 209 52 346

31.54 2.00 78.57 21.94---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 74 38 38 47 197

30.71 8.44 14.29 19.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 31 35 13 34 113

12.86 7.78 4.89 14.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 37 4 10 75

9.96 8.22 1.50 4.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 15 299 1 22 337

6.22 66.44 0.38 9.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 21 32 1 72 126

8.71 7.11 0.38 30.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 450 266 237 1194

20.18 37.69 22.28 19.85===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

334

Page 336: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 11 98 86 34 84 34 347

27.50 27.84 26.22 30.09 34.01 29.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 7 63 62 20 30 15 197

17.50 17.90 18.90 17.70 12.15 13.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 3 41 33 11 21 4 113

7.50 11.65 10.06 9.73 8.50 3.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 1 24 19 6 10 15 75

2.50 6.82 5.79 5.31 4.05 13.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 77 86 33 89 45 337

17.50 21.88 26.22 29.20 36.03 39.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 11 49 42 9 13 2 126

27.50 13.92 12.80 7.96 5.26 1.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 328 113 247 115 1195

3.35 29.46 27.45 9.46 20.67 9.62======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

335

Page 337: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 77 104 33 67 62 343

40.74 39.25 25.19 23.67 19.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 32 48 38 47 32 197

16.93 18.11 29.01 16.61 9.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 17 26 12 34 25 114

8.99 9.81 9.16 12.01 7.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 19 9 19 16 75

6.35 7.17 6.87 6.71 4.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 29 40 28 93 147 337

15.34 15.09 21.37 32.86 45.23-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 22 28 11 23 43 127

11.64 10.57 8.40 8.13 13.23-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 131 283 325 1193

15.84 22.21 10.98 23.72 27.24=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 276 7 46 4 3 2 9 347

38.44 4.61 16.85 18.18 100.00 15.38 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

336

Page 338: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat favorable 118 15 56 4 0 1 3 19716.43 9.87 20.51 18.18 0.00 7.69 20.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 51 22 28 8 0 4 0 113

7.10 14.47 10.26 36.36 0.00 30.77 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 35 19 16 3 0 2 0 75

4.87 12.50 5.86 13.64 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 189 61 78 2 0 4 3 337

26.32 40.13 28.57 9.09 0.00 30.77 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 49 28 49 1 0 0 0 127

6.82 18.42 17.95 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 152 273 22 3 13 15 1196

60.03 12.71 22.83 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 236 1 31 22 49 6 345

36.42 4.35 20.26 33.85 19.52 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 114 5 20 11 42 6 198

17.59 21.74 13.07 16.92 16.73 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 52 4 10 9 31 8 114

8.02 17.39 6.54 13.85 12.35 14.04

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

337

Page 339: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 37 3 10 6 16 3 75

5.71 13.04 6.54 9.23 6.37 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 156 3 74 16 66 23 338

24.07 13.04 48.37 24.62 26.29 40.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 53 7 8 1 47 11 127

8.18 30.43 5.23 1.54 18.73 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 153 65 251 57 1197

54.14 1.92 12.78 5.43 20.97 4.76=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 202 144 346

36.14 22.64-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 98 99 197

17.53 15.57-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 35 78 113

6.26 12.26-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 51 75

4.29 8.02-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 167 170 337

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

338

Page 340: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

29.87 26.73-----------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 33 94 127

5.90 14.78-----------------------------------------------------------Total 559 636 1195

46.78 53.22===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 70 183 93 346

19.83 31.02 37.65---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 52 92 53 197

14.73 15.59 21.46---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 38 56 18 112

10.76 9.49 7.29---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 40 11 74

6.52 6.78 4.45---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 135 163 40 338

38.24 27.63 16.19---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 35 56 32 123

9.92 9.49 12.96---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

339

Page 341: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 353 590 247 119029.66 49.58 20.76

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 63 103 37 14 129 346

25.20 28.07 30.33 12.96 37.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 43 47 30 20 58 198

17.20 12.81 24.59 18.52 16.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 30 31 7 6 39 113

12.00 8.45 5.74 5.56 11.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 20 6 14 11 74

9.20 5.45 4.92 12.96 3.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 71 121 31 48 66 337

28.40 32.97 25.41 44.44 18.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 20 45 11 6 45 127

8.00 12.26 9.02 5.56 12.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 108 348 1195

20.92 30.71 10.21 9.04 29.12========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

340

Page 342: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 34 65 153 94 346

17.44 20.83 33.19 41.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 35 56 68 37 196

17.95 17.95 14.75 16.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 32 36 29 16 113

16.41 11.54 6.29 7.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 19 28 12 75

8.21 6.09 6.07 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 29 89 160 59 337

14.87 28.53 34.71 26.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 49 47 23 8 127

25.13 15.06 4.99 3.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 312 461 226 1194

16.33 26.13 38.61 18.93==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

341

Page 343: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q28. John Cornyn Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 2 2 16 17 53 55 150

7.94 1.94 2.06 4.47 13.71 22.84 25.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 3 8 6 58 43 85 70 273

4.76 7.77 6.19 16.20 34.68 36.64 32.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

342

Page 344: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 3 12 13 84 24 40 27 2034.76 11.65 13.40 23.46 19.35 17.24 12.50

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 7 17 16 33 9 31 32 145

11.11 16.50 16.49 9.22 7.26 13.36 14.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 35 49 43 63 15 10 12 227

55.56 47.57 44.33 17.60 12.10 4.31 5.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 10 15 17 104 16 13 20 195

15.87 14.56 17.53 29.05 12.90 5.60 9.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 358 124 232 216 1193

5.28 8.63 8.13 30.01 10.39 19.45 18.11============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 9 16 125 150

3.42 4.47 21.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 17 58 197 272

6.46 16.20 34.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 28 84 90 202

10.65 23.46 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 40 33 72 145

15.21 9.22 12.63

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

343

Page 345: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 127 63 37 227

48.29 17.60 6.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 42 104 49 195

15.97 29.05 8.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 570 1191

22.08 30.06 47.86=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 12 3 0 4 20 13 90 142

4.76 2.63 0.00 3.57 16.67 10.57 30.20------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 28 17 12 19 33 44 115 268

11.11 14.91 10.08 16.96 27.50 35.77 38.59------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 35 35 13 33 20 20 39 195

13.89 30.70 10.92 29.46 16.67 16.26 13.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 31 15 16 13 23 20 25 143

12.30 13.16 13.45 11.61 19.17 16.26 8.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 100 18 56 16 17 3 10 220

39.68 15.79 47.06 14.29 14.17 2.44 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 46 26 22 27 7 23 19 170

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

344

Page 346: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

18.25 22.81 18.49 24.11 5.83 18.70 6.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 114 119 112 120 123 298 1138

22.14 10.02 10.46 9.84 10.54 10.81 26.19============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 15 4 123 142

3.09 3.57 22.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 58 19 192 269

11.93 16.96 35.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 83 33 80 196

17.08 29.46 14.73-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 63 13 68 144

12.96 11.61 12.52-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 174 16 31 221

35.80 14.29 5.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 93 27 49 169

19.14 24.11 9.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 543 1141

42.59 9.82 47.59===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

345

Page 347: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 68 13 42 29 152

28.33 2.89 15.79 12.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 75 50 96 50 271

31.25 11.11 36.09 21.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 72 40 46 202

18.33 16.00 15.04 19.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 10 67 54 15 146

4.17 14.89 20.30 6.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 5 177 25 20 227

2.08 39.33 9.40 8.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 38 71 9 77 195

15.83 15.78 3.38 32.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 450 266 237 1193

20.12 37.72 22.30 19.87===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

346

Page 348: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 58 41 15 20 14 153

12.20 16.48 12.54 13.39 8.16 12.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 11 75 74 30 54 28 272

26.83 21.31 22.63 26.79 22.04 24.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 2 72 57 15 45 10 201

4.88 20.45 17.43 13.39 18.37 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 7 23 38 17 42 18 145

17.07 6.53 11.62 15.18 17.14 15.79----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 6 42 58 21 62 36 225

14.63 11.93 17.74 18.75 25.31 31.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 10 82 59 14 22 8 195

24.39 23.30 18.04 12.50 8.98 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 327 112 245 114 1191

3.44 29.55 27.46 9.40 20.57 9.57======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

347

Page 349: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 39 52 8 28 23 15020.86 19.55 6.06 9.96 7.08

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 49 69 42 63 48 271

26.20 25.94 31.82 22.42 14.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 38 52 27 45 41 203

20.32 19.55 20.45 16.01 12.62-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 22 33 12 33 46 146

11.76 12.41 9.09 11.74 14.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 14 22 23 62 103 224

7.49 8.27 17.42 22.06 31.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 25 38 20 50 64 197

13.37 14.29 15.15 17.79 19.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 132 281 325 1191

15.70 22.33 11.08 23.59 27.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 116 9 21 3 1 1 1 152

16.16 5.92 7.72 13.04 25.00 7.14 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 185 18 58 3 0 6 2 272

25.77 11.84 21.32 13.04 0.00 42.86 14.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

348

Page 350: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 100 35 53 11 1 2 1 203

13.93 23.03 19.49 47.83 25.00 14.29 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 96 16 21 4 2 1 6 146

13.37 10.53 7.72 17.39 50.00 7.14 42.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 141 30 49 0 0 3 4 227

19.64 19.74 18.01 0.00 0.00 21.43 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 80 44 70 2 0 1 0 197

11.14 28.95 25.74 8.70 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 152 272 23 4 14 14 1197

59.98 12.70 22.72 1.92 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 90 2 8 21 24 6 151

13.89 8.00 5.37 32.31 9.68 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 176 5 27 15 39 9 271

27.16 20.00 18.12 23.08 15.73 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 112 2 24 8 51 6 203

17.28 8.00 16.11 12.31 20.56 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 77 1 22 9 26 10 145

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

349

Page 351: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

11.88 4.00 14.77 13.85 10.48 17.54---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 119 1 44 8 43 11 226

18.36 4.00 29.53 12.31 17.34 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 74 14 24 4 65 15 196

11.42 56.00 16.11 6.15 26.21 26.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 25 149 65 248 57 1192

54.36 2.10 12.50 5.45 20.81 4.78=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 73 78 151

13.11 12.26-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 132 139 271

23.70 21.86-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 90 112 202

16.16 17.61-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 69 77 146

12.39 12.11-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 128 99 227

22.98 15.57-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

350

Page 352: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 65 131 19611.67 20.60

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 557 636 1193

46.69 53.31===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 44 60 47 151

12.54 10.17 19.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 78 124 68 270

22.22 21.02 27.53---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 53 111 38 202

15.10 18.81 15.38---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 34 92 19 145

9.69 15.59 7.69---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 80 117 30 227

22.79 19.83 12.15---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 62 86 45 193

17.66 14.58 18.22---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 351 590 247 1188

29.55 49.66 20.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

351

Page 353: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 24 47 17 3 60 151

9.52 12.81 13.93 2.80 17.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 67 80 28 22 75 272

26.59 21.80 22.95 20.56 21.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 57 20 20 61 202

17.46 15.53 16.39 18.69 17.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 31 44 19 11 41 146

12.30 11.99 15.57 10.28 11.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 51 81 14 38 44 228

20.24 22.07 11.48 35.51 12.64----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 35 58 24 13 67 197

13.89 15.80 19.67 12.15 19.25----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 367 122 107 348 1196

21.07 30.69 10.20 8.95 29.10========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

352

Page 354: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 13 27 61 50 151

6.74 8.65 13.26 22.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 28 60 115 69 272

14.51 19.23 25.00 30.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 59 66 32 201

22.80 18.91 14.35 14.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 18 38 63 26 145

9.33 12.18 13.70 11.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 20 60 109 38 227

10.36 19.23 23.70 16.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 70 68 46 12 196

36.27 21.79 10.00 5.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 193 312 460 227 1192

16.19 26.17 38.59 19.04==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

353

Page 355: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q29. David Alameel Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 14 17 9 20 7 5 2 74

23.33 16.35 9.38 5.60 5.60 2.16 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 21 43 32 69 10 8 8 191

35.00 41.35 33.33 19.33 8.00 3.46 3.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

354

Page 356: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 10 20 24 99 36 55 39 28316.67 19.23 25.00 27.73 28.80 23.81 17.89

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 0 0 11 6 8 33 18 76

0.00 0.00 11.46 1.68 6.40 14.29 8.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 2 1 0 11 13 26 47 100

3.33 0.96 0.00 3.08 10.40 11.26 21.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 13 23 20 152 51 104 104 467

21.67 22.12 20.83 42.58 40.80 45.02 47.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 104 96 357 125 231 218 1191

5.04 8.73 8.06 29.97 10.50 19.40 18.30============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 40 20 13 73

15.38 5.60 2.27---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 96 69 26 191

36.92 19.33 4.54---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 54 99 130 283

20.77 27.73 22.69---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 6 59 76

4.23 1.68 10.30

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

355

Page 357: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 2 11 86 99

0.77 3.08 15.01---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 57 152 259 468

21.92 42.58 45.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 357 573 1190

21.85 30.00 48.15=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 56 6 7 0 0 3 0 72

22.05 5.31 5.88 0.00 0.00 2.42 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 87 23 46 5 6 8 9 184

34.25 20.35 38.66 4.55 4.96 6.45 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 48 36 29 36 24 33 67 273

18.90 31.86 24.37 32.73 19.83 26.61 22.56------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 7 2 8 12 8 35 75

1.18 6.19 1.68 7.27 9.92 6.45 11.78------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 3 3 1 12 14 15 45 93

1.18 2.65 0.84 10.91 11.57 12.10 15.15------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 57 38 34 49 65 57 141 441

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

356

Page 358: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

22.44 33.63 28.57 44.55 53.72 45.97 47.47------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 119 110 121 124 297 1138

22.32 9.93 10.46 9.67 10.63 10.90 26.10============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 69 0 3 72

14.20 0.00 0.55-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 155 5 22 182

31.89 4.55 4.05-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 114 36 125 275

23.46 32.73 23.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 8 56 76

2.47 7.27 10.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 12 74 93

1.44 10.91 13.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 129 49 263 441

26.54 44.55 48.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 110 543 1139

42.67 9.66 47.67===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

357

Page 359: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 4 67 0 2 73

1.67 14.76 0.00 0.85---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 18 162 2 9 191

7.50 35.68 0.76 3.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 71 105 63 45 284

29.58 23.13 23.86 19.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 29 9 31 8 77

12.08 1.98 11.74 3.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 17 7 58 18 100

7.08 1.54 21.97 7.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 101 104 110 154 469

42.08 22.91 41.67 65.25---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 454 264 236 1194

20.10 38.02 22.11 19.77===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

358

Page 360: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 2 17 19 13 15 7 73

4.88 4.87 5.76 11.40 6.07 6.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 5 31 52 21 51 31 191

12.20 8.88 15.76 18.42 20.65 27.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 5 87 80 29 59 25 285

12.20 24.93 24.24 25.44 23.89 21.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 5 27 19 10 11 6 78

12.20 7.74 5.76 8.77 4.45 5.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 4 21 31 11 28 4 99

9.76 6.02 9.39 9.65 11.34 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 20 166 129 30 83 41 469

48.78 47.56 39.09 26.32 33.60 35.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 349 330 114 247 114 1195

3.43 29.21 27.62 9.54 20.67 9.54======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

359

Page 361: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 12 11 9 11 29 726.52 4.14 6.82 3.91 8.95

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 23 24 27 55 61 190

12.50 9.02 20.45 19.57 18.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 26 78 37 73 69 283

14.13 29.32 28.03 25.98 21.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 15 25 5 17 15 77

8.15 9.40 3.79 6.05 4.63-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 22 27 9 14 24 96

11.96 10.15 6.82 4.98 7.41-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 86 101 45 111 126 469

46.74 37.97 34.09 39.50 38.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 266 132 281 324 1187

15.50 22.41 11.12 23.67 27.30=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 31 21 19 2 0 0 0 73

4.33 13.46 7.09 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 111 39 35 1 0 1 3 190

15.50 25.00 13.06 4.55 0.00 7.14 20.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

360

Page 362: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 163 32 76 11 0 4 0 286

22.77 20.51 28.36 50.00 0.00 28.57 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 54 3 13 2 1 2 2 77

7.54 1.92 4.85 9.09 33.33 14.29 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 72 2 18 1 2 1 3 99

10.06 1.28 6.72 4.55 66.67 7.14 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 285 59 107 5 0 6 7 469

39.80 37.82 39.93 22.73 0.00 42.86 46.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 268 22 3 14 15 1194

59.97 13.07 22.45 1.84 0.25 1.17 1.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 41 0 10 3 18 0 72

6.37 0.00 6.62 4.69 7.14 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 88 2 42 7 44 8 191

13.66 8.33 27.81 10.94 17.46 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 158 5 23 16 62 21 285

24.53 20.83 15.23 25.00 24.60 36.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 0 12 5 12 3 77

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

361

Page 363: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.99 0.00 7.95 7.81 4.76 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 55 4 9 11 17 3 99

8.54 16.67 5.96 17.19 6.75 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 257 13 55 22 99 23 469

39.91 54.17 36.42 34.38 39.29 39.66---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 24 151 64 252 58 1193

53.98 2.01 12.66 5.36 21.12 4.86=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 35 38 73

6.31 5.96-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 85 106 191

15.32 16.61-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 148 136 284

26.67 21.32-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 38 39 77

6.85 6.11-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 60 39 99

10.81 6.11-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

362

Page 364: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 189 280 46934.05 43.89

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 555 638 1193

46.52 53.48===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 27 39 7 73

7.56 6.67 2.82---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 73 100 17 190

20.45 17.09 6.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 79 144 62 285

22.13 24.62 25.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 21 31 24 76

5.88 5.30 9.68---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 19 47 33 99

5.32 8.03 13.31---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 138 224 105 467

38.66 38.29 42.34---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 585 248 1190

30.00 49.16 20.84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

363

Page 365: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 18 29 6 5 15 73

7.17 7.95 4.88 4.81 4.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 46 62 12 29 42 191

18.33 16.99 9.76 27.88 11.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 74 66 35 32 77 284

29.48 18.08 28.46 30.77 21.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 23 3 5 34 76

4.38 6.30 2.44 4.81 9.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 16 35 8 6 35 100

6.37 9.59 6.50 5.77 9.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 86 150 59 27 148 470

34.26 41.10 47.97 25.96 42.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 365 123 104 351 1194

21.02 30.57 10.30 8.71 29.40========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

364

Page 366: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 9 25 28 11 73

4.59 7.94 6.11 4.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 21 53 77 40 191

10.71 16.83 16.81 17.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 61 67 100 56 284

31.12 21.27 21.83 24.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 13 31 17 77

8.16 4.13 6.77 7.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 11 15 53 20 99

5.61 4.76 11.57 8.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 78 142 169 81 470

39.80 45.08 36.90 36.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 315 458 225 1194

16.42 26.38 38.36 18.84==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

365

Page 367: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q30. Rick Perry Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 4 1 1 35 22 94 94 251

6.45 0.99 1.04 9.75 17.74 40.52 43.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 1 9 13 54 47 90 74 288

1.61 8.91 13.54 15.04 37.90 38.79 33.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

366

Page 368: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 3 4 2 56 18 28 17 1284.84 3.96 2.08 15.60 14.52 12.07 7.80

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 9 12 51 17 6 9 107

4.84 8.91 12.50 14.21 13.71 2.59 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 46 71 61 117 15 11 17 338

74.19 70.30 63.54 32.59 12.10 4.74 7.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 5 7 7 46 5 3 7 80

8.06 6.93 7.29 12.81 4.03 1.29 3.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 101 96 359 124 232 218 1192

5.20 8.47 8.05 30.12 10.40 19.46 18.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 35 209 250

2.32 9.75 36.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 23 54 210 287

8.88 15.04 36.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 8 56 63 127

3.09 15.60 11.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 51 32 107

9.27 14.21 5.60

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

367

Page 369: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 179 117 43 339

69.11 32.59 7.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 19 46 14 79

7.34 12.81 2.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 359 571 1189

21.78 30.19 48.02=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 14 8 2 16 35 31 138 244

5.58 6.96 1.68 14.16 28.93 25.00 46.15------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 25 15 13 18 51 34 119 275

9.96 13.04 10.92 15.93 42.15 27.42 39.80------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 18 15 9 25 16 27 14 124

7.17 13.04 7.56 22.12 13.22 21.77 4.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 19 17 9 18 7 20 13 103

7.57 14.78 7.56 15.93 5.79 16.13 4.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 152 55 81 20 9 7 11 335

60.56 47.83 68.07 17.70 7.44 5.65 3.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 23 5 5 16 3 5 4 61

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

368

Page 370: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

9.16 4.35 4.20 14.16 2.48 4.03 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 115 119 113 121 124 299 1142

21.98 10.07 10.42 9.89 10.60 10.86 26.18============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 23 16 204 243

4.75 14.16 37.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 53 18 204 275

10.95 15.93 37.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 42 25 56 123

8.68 22.12 10.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 18 39 102

9.30 15.93 7.20-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 288 20 27 335

59.50 17.70 4.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 33 16 12 61

6.82 14.16 2.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 113 542 1139

42.49 9.92 47.59===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

369

Page 371: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 91 20 92 49 252

37.60 4.43 34.59 20.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 75 48 109 56 288

30.99 10.64 40.98 23.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 28 36 36 28 128

11.57 7.98 13.53 11.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 25 42 15 26 108

10.33 9.31 5.64 10.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 12 286 14 28 340

4.96 63.41 5.26 11.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 11 19 0 50 80

4.55 4.21 0.00 21.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 451 266 237 1196

20.23 37.71 22.24 19.82===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

370

Page 372: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 91 60 25 48 22 252

15.00 25.78 18.13 22.94 19.59 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 10 95 73 29 59 22 288

25.00 26.91 22.05 26.61 24.08 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 5 35 36 11 24 16 127

12.50 9.92 10.88 10.09 9.80 13.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 29 38 7 25 6 108

7.50 8.22 11.48 6.42 10.20 5.22----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 9 72 96 32 82 48 339

22.50 20.40 29.00 29.36 33.47 41.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 7 31 28 5 7 1 79

17.50 8.78 8.46 4.59 2.86 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 353 331 109 245 115 1193

3.35 29.59 27.75 9.14 20.54 9.64======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

371

Page 373: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 66 78 24 47 36 25135.29 29.66 18.32 16.73 10.98

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 48 74 37 80 48 287

25.67 28.14 28.24 28.47 14.63-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 15 36 22 19 34 126

8.02 13.69 16.79 6.76 10.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 17 9 30 39 106

5.88 6.46 6.87 10.68 11.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 36 41 32 92 139 340

19.25 15.59 24.43 32.74 42.38-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 11 17 7 13 32 80

5.88 6.46 5.34 4.63 9.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 131 281 328 1190

15.71 22.10 11.01 23.61 27.56=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 182 8 49 5 1 2 5 252

25.38 5.30 18.01 22.73 33.33 15.38 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 192 13 61 11 2 3 5 287

26.78 8.61 22.43 50.00 66.67 23.08 35.71

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

372

Page 374: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 64 24 35 1 0 2 1 127

8.93 15.89 12.87 4.55 0.00 15.38 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 63 15 26 3 0 0 0 107

8.79 9.93 9.56 13.64 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 186 69 73 2 0 6 3 339

25.94 45.70 26.84 9.09 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 30 22 28 0 0 0 0 80

4.18 14.57 10.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 151 272 22 3 13 14 1192

60.15 12.67 22.82 1.85 0.25 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 156 2 16 25 45 7 251

24.22 9.09 10.60 38.46 17.79 12.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 181 4 32 15 46 9 287

28.11 18.18 21.19 23.08 18.18 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 70 6 13 4 27 8 128

10.87 27.27 8.61 6.15 10.67 14.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 61 1 12 4 22 6 106

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

373

Page 375: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

9.47 4.55 7.95 6.15 8.70 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 147 5 74 16 79 18 339

22.83 22.73 49.01 24.62 31.23 31.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 29 4 4 1 34 9 81

4.50 18.18 2.65 1.54 13.44 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 22 151 65 253 57 1192

54.03 1.85 12.67 5.45 21.22 4.78=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 118 134 252

21.15 21.07-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 144 144 288

25.81 22.64-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 64 63 127

11.47 9.91-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 49 59 108

8.78 9.28-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 156 183 339

27.96 28.77-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

374

Page 376: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 27 53 804.84 8.33

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 636 1194

46.73 53.27===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 65 114 73 252

18.26 19.45 29.44---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 60 149 79 288

16.85 25.43 31.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 45 64 18 127

12.64 10.92 7.26---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 38 58 12 108

10.67 9.90 4.84---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 128 168 43 339

35.96 28.67 17.34---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 20 33 23 76

5.62 5.63 9.27---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 586 248 1190

29.92 49.24 20.84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

375

Page 377: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 54 71 28 13 86 252

21.51 19.40 23.14 12.38 24.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 42 85 29 25 108 289

16.73 23.22 23.97 23.81 30.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 40 31 10 8 38 127

15.94 8.47 8.26 7.62 10.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 28 31 16 10 23 108

11.16 8.47 13.22 9.52 6.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 77 118 29 46 69 339

30.68 32.24 23.97 43.81 19.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 10 30 9 3 27 79

3.98 8.20 7.44 2.86 7.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 121 105 351 1194

21.02 30.65 10.13 8.79 29.40========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

376

Page 378: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 21 62 108 60 251

10.66 19.75 23.43 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 50 64 109 66 289

25.38 20.38 23.64 29.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 27 37 45 19 128

13.71 11.78 9.76 8.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 30 38 17 109

12.18 9.55 8.24 7.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 40 90 148 62 340

20.30 28.66 32.10 27.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 35 31 13 1 80

17.77 9.87 2.82 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 225 1197

16.46 26.23 38.51 18.80==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

377

Page 379: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q31. Greg Abbott Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 4 4 3 35 33 102 120 301

6.45 3.88 3.12 9.75 26.61 44.16 55.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 2 8 5 58 36 77 51 237

3.23 7.77 5.21 16.16 29.03 33.33 23.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

378

Page 380: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 6 7 12 83 23 29 22 1829.68 6.80 12.50 23.12 18.55 12.55 10.14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 2 11 14 37 4 5 5 78

3.23 10.68 14.58 10.31 3.23 2.16 2.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 41 52 47 50 16 3 2 211

66.13 50.49 48.96 13.93 12.90 1.30 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 7 21 15 96 12 15 17 183

11.29 20.39 15.62 26.74 9.68 6.49 7.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 359 124 231 217 1192

5.20 8.64 8.05 30.12 10.40 19.38 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 12 35 255 302

4.58 9.75 44.66---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 15 58 163 236

5.73 16.16 28.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 25 83 74 182

9.54 23.12 12.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 27 37 13 77

10.31 10.31 2.28

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

379

Page 381: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 140 50 21 211

53.44 13.93 3.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 43 96 45 184

16.41 26.74 7.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 359 571 1192

21.98 30.12 47.90=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 15 9 5 13 52 39 158 291

5.88 7.96 4.17 11.61 43.33 31.20 53.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 29 17 7 21 39 34 87 234

11.37 15.04 5.83 18.75 32.50 27.20 29.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 34 27 14 28 13 27 29 172

13.33 23.89 11.67 25.00 10.83 21.60 9.80------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 15 14 19 13 4 6 5 76

5.88 12.39 15.83 11.61 3.33 4.80 1.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 111 20 56 9 4 2 4 206

43.53 17.70 46.67 8.04 3.33 1.60 1.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 51 26 19 28 8 17 13 162

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

380

Page 382: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

20.00 23.01 15.83 25.00 6.67 13.60 4.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 120 112 120 125 296 1141

22.35 9.90 10.52 9.82 10.52 10.96 25.94============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 30 13 249 292

6.15 11.61 45.94-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 53 21 160 234

10.86 18.75 29.52-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 75 28 70 173

15.37 25.00 12.92-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 47 13 15 75

9.63 11.61 2.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 187 9 10 206

38.32 8.04 1.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 96 28 38 162

19.67 25.00 7.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 542 1142

42.73 9.81 47.46===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

381

Page 383: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 78 26 141 57 302

32.77 5.73 53.01 24.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 67 55 80 36 238

28.15 12.11 30.08 15.19---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 43 65 33 42 183

18.07 14.32 12.41 17.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 46 4 12 78

6.72 10.13 1.50 5.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 5 188 2 15 210

2.10 41.41 0.75 6.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 29 74 6 75 184

12.18 16.30 2.26 31.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 454 266 237 1195

19.92 37.99 22.26 19.83===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

382

Page 384: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 8 81 82 35 65 30 301

20.00 23.08 24.85 30.70 26.53 26.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 11 73 67 17 46 24 238

27.50 20.80 20.30 14.91 18.78 21.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 0 68 52 19 36 7 182

0.00 19.37 15.76 16.67 14.69 6.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 21 22 8 16 8 78

7.50 5.98 6.67 7.02 6.53 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 6 36 54 17 62 36 211

15.00 10.26 16.36 14.91 25.31 31.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 12 72 53 18 20 9 184

30.00 20.51 16.06 15.79 8.16 7.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 330 114 245 114 1194

3.35 29.40 27.64 9.55 20.52 9.55======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

383

Page 385: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 63 87 35 58 55 29833.69 32.83 26.72 20.71 16.82

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 38 67 29 62 41 237

20.32 25.28 22.14 22.14 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 31 41 28 36 46 182

16.58 15.47 21.37 12.86 14.07-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 12 7 22 25 77

5.88 4.53 5.34 7.86 7.65-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 16 15 17 63 100 211

8.56 5.66 12.98 22.50 30.58-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 28 43 15 39 60 185

14.97 16.23 11.45 13.93 18.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 280 327 1190

15.71 22.27 11.01 23.53 27.48=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 226 12 50 5 3 2 3 301

31.61 7.79 18.38 21.74 100.00 14.29 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 157 17 44 10 0 4 5 237

21.96 11.04 16.18 43.48 0.00 28.57 35.71

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

384

Page 386: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 88 31 58 3 0 1 2 183

12.31 20.13 21.32 13.04 0.00 7.14 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 40 10 23 2 0 2 1 78

5.59 6.49 8.46 8.70 0.00 14.29 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 135 34 34 1 0 5 3 212

18.88 22.08 12.50 4.35 0.00 35.71 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 69 50 63 2 0 0 0 184

9.65 32.47 23.16 8.70 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 154 272 23 3 14 14 1195

59.83 12.89 22.76 1.92 0.25 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 197 2 32 22 41 8 302

30.45 8.70 21.19 33.85 16.21 14.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 140 2 30 15 44 7 238

21.64 8.70 19.87 23.08 17.39 12.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 89 7 16 11 51 9 183

13.76 30.43 10.60 16.92 20.16 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 42 2 8 3 18 5 78

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

385

Page 387: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.49 8.70 5.30 4.62 7.11 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 104 0 45 7 41 14 211

16.07 0.00 29.80 10.77 16.21 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 75 10 20 7 58 14 184

11.59 43.48 13.25 10.77 22.92 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 151 65 253 57 1196

54.10 1.92 12.63 5.43 21.15 4.77=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 148 154 302

26.43 24.18-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 114 124 238

20.36 19.47-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 78 105 183

13.93 16.48-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 42 36 78

7.50 5.65-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 113 98 211

20.18 15.38-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

386

Page 388: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 65 120 18511.61 18.84

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 560 637 1197

46.78 53.22===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 75 143 84 302

21.07 24.28 33.87---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 55 131 52 238

15.45 22.24 20.97---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 56 89 37 182

15.73 15.11 14.92---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 27 38 13 78

7.58 6.45 5.24---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 80 106 26 212

22.47 18.00 10.48---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 63 82 36 181

17.70 13.92 14.52---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 589 248 1193

29.84 49.37 20.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

387

Page 389: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 59 90 27 12 114 302

23.51 24.59 21.95 11.21 32.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 56 66 29 19 68 238

22.31 18.03 23.58 17.76 19.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 45 46 20 18 54 183

17.93 12.57 16.26 16.82 15.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 17 26 10 7 18 78

6.77 7.10 8.13 6.54 5.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 47 76 13 38 37 211

18.73 20.77 10.57 35.51 10.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 27 62 24 13 59 185

10.76 16.94 19.51 12.15 16.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 123 107 350 1197

20.97 30.58 10.28 8.94 29.24========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

388

Page 390: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 33 63 134 72 302

16.67 20.13 29.13 31.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 43 53 90 53 239

21.72 16.93 19.57 23.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 43 57 55 28 183

21.72 18.21 11.96 12.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 21 34 12 78

5.56 6.71 7.39 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 16 57 104 34 211

8.08 18.21 22.61 15.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 52 62 43 27 184

26.26 19.81 9.35 11.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 460 226 1197

16.54 26.15 38.43 18.88==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

389

Page 391: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q32. Wendy Davis Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 48 64 45 77 6 11 8 259

77.42 60.95 46.88 21.51 4.84 4.78 3.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 2 23 27 54 21 9 1 137

3.23 21.90 28.12 15.08 16.94 3.91 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

390

Page 392: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 5 5 8 61 15 21 18 1338.06 4.76 8.33 17.04 12.10 9.13 8.33

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 1 0 3 24 20 26 11 85

1.61 0.00 3.12 6.70 16.13 11.30 5.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 1 1 0 35 49 149 156 391

1.61 0.95 0.00 9.78 39.52 64.78 72.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 5 12 13 107 13 14 22 186

8.06 11.43 13.54 29.89 10.48 6.09 10.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 105 96 358 124 230 216 1191

5.21 8.82 8.06 30.06 10.41 19.31 18.14============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 157 77 25 259

59.92 21.51 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 52 54 32 138

19.85 15.08 5.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 18 61 54 133

6.87 17.04 9.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 4 24 57 85

1.53 6.70 10.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

391

Page 393: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 2 35 354 391

0.76 9.78 62.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 29 107 48 184

11.07 29.89 8.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 358 570 1190

22.02 30.08 47.90=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 150 33 57 8 2 5 0 255

58.82 28.95 47.50 7.08 1.67 4.17 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 38 31 31 12 4 9 11 136

14.90 27.19 25.83 10.62 3.33 7.50 3.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 18 23 7 25 6 14 30 123

7.06 20.18 5.83 22.12 5.00 11.67 10.10------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 2 7 3 9 13 14 33 81

0.78 6.14 2.50 7.96 10.83 11.67 11.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 5 2 2 33 85 56 200 383

1.96 1.75 1.67 29.20 70.83 46.67 67.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 42 18 20 26 10 22 23 161

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

392

Page 394: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

16.47 15.79 16.67 23.01 8.33 18.33 7.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 120 113 120 120 297 1139

22.39 10.01 10.54 9.92 10.54 10.54 26.08============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 241 8 7 256

49.39 7.08 1.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 100 12 24 136

20.49 10.62 4.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 47 25 51 123

9.63 22.12 9.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 9 60 81

2.46 7.96 11.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 9 33 341 383

1.84 29.20 63.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 79 26 55 160

16.19 23.01 10.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 538 1139

42.84 9.92 47.23===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

393

Page 395: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 246 1 7 260

2.48 54.30 0.38 2.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 21 97 4 17 139

8.68 21.41 1.52 7.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 42 44 12 34 132

17.36 9.71 4.56 14.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 34 9 18 23 84

14.05 1.99 6.84 9.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 97 3 218 74 392

40.08 0.66 82.89 31.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 42 54 10 80 186

17.36 11.92 3.80 34.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 453 263 235 1193

20.28 37.97 22.05 19.70===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

394

Page 396: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 50 68 31 73 34 259

7.50 14.33 20.67 27.43 29.67 29.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 7 48 27 12 25 19 138

17.50 13.75 8.21 10.62 10.16 16.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 1 41 51 17 20 2 132

2.50 11.75 15.50 15.04 8.13 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 4 23 26 10 14 7 84

10.00 6.59 7.90 8.85 5.69 6.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 13 103 104 30 98 44 392

32.50 29.51 31.61 26.55 39.84 38.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 12 84 53 13 16 8 186

30.00 24.07 16.11 11.50 6.50 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 349 329 113 246 114 1191

3.36 29.30 27.62 9.49 20.65 9.57======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

395

Page 397: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 28 33 22 70 106 25915.05 12.45 16.79 24.82 32.82

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 15 20 19 45 39 138

8.06 7.55 14.50 15.96 12.07-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 20 38 22 23 29 132

10.75 14.34 16.79 8.16 8.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 14 17 11 28 15 85

7.53 6.42 8.40 9.93 4.64-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 81 114 42 74 77 388

43.55 43.02 32.06 26.24 23.84-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 28 43 15 42 57 185

15.05 16.23 11.45 14.89 17.65-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 131 282 323 1187

15.67 22.33 11.04 23.76 27.21=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 140 65 51 2 0 2 0 260

19.55 41.94 19.03 9.09 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 56 25 40 10 0 4 3 138

7.82 16.13 14.93 45.45 0.00 30.77 21.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

396

Page 398: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 71 16 42 3 0 1 0 133

9.92 10.32 15.67 13.64 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 67 5 8 1 0 3 0 84

9.36 3.23 2.99 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 304 6 59 5 3 3 11 391

42.46 3.87 22.01 22.73 100.00 23.08 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 78 38 68 1 0 0 0 185

10.89 24.52 25.37 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 268 22 3 13 14 1191

60.12 13.01 22.50 1.85 0.25 1.09 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 125 2 53 10 56 14 260

19.38 8.70 35.10 15.38 22.22 25.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 70 3 13 6 35 12 139

10.85 13.04 8.61 9.23 13.89 21.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 62 2 17 6 41 4 132

9.61 8.70 11.26 9.23 16.27 7.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 53 0 8 8 9 6 84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

397

Page 399: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

8.22 0.00 5.30 12.31 3.57 10.71---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 267 8 35 27 46 10 393

41.40 34.78 23.18 41.54 18.25 17.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 68 8 25 8 65 10 184

10.54 34.78 16.56 12.31 25.79 17.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 23 151 65 252 56 1192

54.11 1.93 12.67 5.45 21.14 4.70=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 121 139 260

21.61 21.92-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 67 71 138

11.96 11.20-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 51 82 133

9.11 12.93-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 37 48 85

6.61 7.57-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 214 179 393

38.21 28.23-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

398

Page 400: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 70 115 18512.50 18.14

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 560 634 1194

46.90 53.10===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 103 132 25 260

29.10 22.37 10.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 48 75 15 138

13.56 12.71 6.12---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 41 67 25 133

11.58 11.36 10.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 38 30 84

4.52 6.44 12.24---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 82 212 99 393

23.16 35.93 40.41---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 64 66 51 181

18.08 11.19 20.82---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 354 590 245 1189

29.77 49.62 20.61

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

399

Page 401: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 49 98 25 48 40 260

19.60 26.70 20.33 44.44 11.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 39 44 8 17 31 139

15.60 11.99 6.50 15.74 8.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 40 45 9 5 34 133

16.00 12.26 7.32 4.63 9.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 18 13 3 27 84

9.20 4.90 10.57 2.78 7.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 71 110 48 26 137 392

28.40 29.97 39.02 24.07 39.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 28 52 20 9 77 186

11.20 14.17 16.26 8.33 22.25----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 123 108 346 1194

20.94 30.74 10.30 9.05 28.98========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

400

Page 402: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 25 68 113 54 260

12.63 21.66 24.67 24.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 36 35 52 16 139

18.18 11.15 11.35 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 42 45 34 12 133

21.21 14.33 7.42 5.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 8 22 29 25 84

4.04 7.01 6.33 11.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 30 82 180 101 393

15.15 26.11 39.30 45.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 57 62 50 16 185

28.79 19.75 10.92 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 458 224 1194

16.58 26.30 38.36 18.76==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

401

Page 403: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q33. Leticia Van de Putte Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 25 31 25 23 3 8 4 119

39.06 30.10 26.04 6.48 2.42 3.45 1.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 17 31 28 48 8 5 10 147

26.56 30.10 29.17 13.52 6.45 2.16 4.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

402

Page 404: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 9 14 21 87 28 42 29 23014.06 13.59 21.88 24.51 22.58 18.10 13.36

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 0 2 0 17 12 33 20 84

0.00 1.94 0.00 4.79 9.68 14.22 9.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 1 1 2 6 14 41 64 129

1.56 0.97 2.08 1.69 11.29 17.67 29.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 12 24 20 174 59 103 90 482

18.75 23.30 20.83 49.01 47.58 44.40 41.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 64 103 96 355 124 232 217 1191

5.37 8.65 8.06 29.81 10.41 19.48 18.22============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 81 23 15 119

30.92 6.48 2.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 76 48 24 148

29.01 13.52 4.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 87 99 230

16.79 24.51 17.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 2 17 64 83

0.76 4.79 11.19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

403

Page 405: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 3 6 118 127

1.15 1.69 20.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 56 174 252 482

21.37 49.01 44.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 355 572 1189

22.04 29.86 48.11=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 78 13 20 2 1 3 1 118

30.59 11.50 16.95 1.75 0.83 2.48 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 68 23 35 6 3 4 8 147

26.67 20.35 29.66 5.26 2.50 3.31 2.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 43 29 20 31 22 28 48 221

16.86 25.66 16.95 27.19 18.33 23.14 16.16------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 5 5 0 12 14 14 34 84

1.96 4.42 0.00 10.53 11.67 11.57 11.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 2 2 2 3 23 13 73 118

0.78 1.77 1.69 2.63 19.17 10.74 24.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 59 41 41 60 57 59 133 450

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

404

Page 406: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

23.14 36.28 34.75 52.63 47.50 48.76 44.78------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 114 120 121 297 1138

22.41 9.93 10.37 10.02 10.54 10.63 26.10============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 112 2 5 119

23.05 1.75 0.92-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 126 6 15 147

25.93 5.26 2.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 91 31 99 221

18.72 27.19 18.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 10 12 63 85

2.06 10.53 11.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 6 3 110 119

1.23 2.63 20.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 141 60 249 450

29.01 52.63 46.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 114 541 1141

42.59 9.99 47.41===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

405

Page 407: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 110 1 4 118

1.27 24.34 0.37 1.69---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 13 125 1 9 148

5.49 27.65 0.37 3.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 57 93 39 41 230

24.05 20.58 14.61 17.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 31 6 25 24 86

13.08 1.33 9.36 10.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 37 4 71 16 128

15.61 0.88 26.59 6.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 96 114 130 143 483

40.51 25.22 48.69 60.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 452 267 237 1193

19.87 37.89 22.38 19.87===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

406

Page 408: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 0 18 26 16 37 21 118

0.00 5.13 7.85 14.29 15.10 18.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 1 37 44 12 39 15 148

2.50 10.54 13.29 10.71 15.92 13.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 8 66 75 23 38 21 231

20.00 18.80 22.66 20.54 15.51 18.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 2 26 17 10 18 11 84

5.00 7.41 5.14 8.93 7.35 9.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 35 31 19 28 7 127

17.50 9.97 9.37 16.96 11.43 6.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 22 169 138 32 85 36 482

55.00 48.15 41.69 28.57 34.69 32.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 331 112 245 111 1190

3.36 29.50 27.82 9.41 20.59 9.33======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

407

Page 409: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 16 11 11 28 53 1198.65 4.18 8.33 9.93 16.26

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 19 22 19 38 49 147

10.27 8.37 14.39 13.48 15.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 23 59 27 60 62 231

12.43 22.43 20.45 21.28 19.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 27 11 18 18 86

6.49 10.27 8.33 6.38 5.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 30 42 13 19 23 127

16.22 15.97 9.85 6.74 7.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 85 102 51 119 121 478

45.95 38.78 38.64 42.20 37.12-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 185 263 132 282 326 1188

15.57 22.14 11.11 23.74 27.44=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 65 19 31 1 0 3 0 119

9.08 12.26 11.57 4.55 0.00 21.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 74 32 36 4 0 2 0 148

10.34 20.65 13.43 18.18 0.00 14.29 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

408

Page 410: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 136 35 43 10 1 3 3 231

18.99 22.58 16.04 45.45 25.00 21.43 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 62 2 19 1 0 0 1 85

8.66 1.29 7.09 4.55 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 91 2 28 0 1 1 5 128

12.71 1.29 10.45 0.00 25.00 7.14 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 288 65 111 6 2 5 5 482

40.22 41.94 41.42 27.27 50.00 35.71 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 268 22 4 14 14 1193

60.02 12.99 22.46 1.84 0.34 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 60 1 18 3 28 8 118

9.32 4.17 12.08 4.76 11.02 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 74 0 29 5 33 6 147

11.49 0.00 19.46 7.94 12.99 10.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 117 1 22 13 60 18 231

18.17 4.17 14.77 20.63 23.62 31.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 58 3 9 3 12 1 86

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

409

Page 411: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

9.01 12.50 6.04 4.76 4.72 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 70 4 12 15 23 4 128

10.87 16.67 8.05 23.81 9.06 6.90---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 265 15 59 24 98 21 482

41.15 62.50 39.60 38.10 38.58 36.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 24 149 63 254 58 1192

54.03 2.01 12.50 5.29 21.31 4.87=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 52 66 118

9.27 10.46-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 73 74 147

13.01 11.73-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 120 111 231

21.39 17.59-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 40 46 86

7.13 7.29-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 79 49 128

14.08 7.77-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

410

Page 412: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 197 285 48235.12 45.17

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 561 631 1192

47.06 52.94===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 47 58 14 119

13.17 9.90 5.69---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 65 67 16 148

18.21 11.43 6.50---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 59 124 47 230

16.53 21.16 19.11---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 25 41 19 85

7.00 7.00 7.72---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 24 62 42 128

6.72 10.58 17.07---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 137 234 108 479

38.38 39.93 43.90---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 586 246 1189

30.03 49.29 20.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

411

Page 413: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 17 39 18 25 20 119

6.80 10.60 14.75 23.81 5.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 41 57 10 15 25 148

16.40 15.49 8.20 14.29 7.12----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 61 60 22 16 72 231

24.40 16.30 18.03 15.24 20.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 22 19 15 8 23 87

8.80 5.16 12.30 7.62 6.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 18 38 29 9 34 128

7.20 10.33 23.77 8.57 9.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 91 155 28 32 177 483

36.40 42.12 22.95 30.48 50.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 122 105 351 1196

20.90 30.77 10.20 8.78 29.35========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

412

Page 414: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 17 31 51 20 119

8.59 9.90 11.21 8.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 23 45 57 22 147

11.62 14.38 12.53 9.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 52 61 75 42 230

26.26 19.49 16.48 18.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 8 15 35 28 86

4.04 4.79 7.69 12.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 13 26 62 26 127

6.57 8.31 13.63 11.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 85 135 175 87 482

42.93 43.13 38.46 38.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 455 225 1191

16.62 26.28 38.20 18.89==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

413

Page 415: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q34. Dan Patrick Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 1 1 11 13 65 76 172

8.06 0.97 1.03 3.10 10.48 28.02 34.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 1 8 6 58 40 90 76 279

1.61 7.77 6.19 16.34 32.26 38.79 34.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

414

Page 416: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 6 15 18 78 24 35 22 1989.68 14.56 18.56 21.97 19.35 15.09 10.09

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 7 9 34 12 10 15 98

17.74 6.80 9.28 9.58 9.68 4.31 6.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 25 46 40 47 17 11 3 189

40.32 44.66 41.24 13.24 13.71 4.74 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 14 26 23 127 18 21 26 255

22.58 25.24 23.71 35.77 14.52 9.05 11.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 355 124 232 218 1191

5.21 8.65 8.14 29.81 10.41 19.48 18.30============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 8 11 153 172

3.04 3.10 26.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 15 58 205 278

5.70 16.34 35.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 39 78 81 198

14.83 21.97 14.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 27 34 37 98

10.27 9.58 6.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

415

Page 417: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 111 47 31 189

42.21 13.24 5.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 63 127 65 255

23.95 35.77 11.36---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 355 572 1190

22.10 29.83 48.07=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 14 4 2 6 37 17 88 168

5.53 3.54 1.69 5.45 30.33 13.71 29.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 28 12 7 20 41 46 120 274

11.07 10.62 5.93 18.18 33.61 37.10 40.13------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 38 26 14 35 20 24 29 186

15.02 23.01 11.86 31.82 16.39 19.35 9.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 21 22 11 10 8 5 20 97

8.30 19.47 9.32 9.09 6.56 4.03 6.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 88 22 44 4 5 11 11 185

34.78 19.47 37.29 3.64 4.10 8.87 3.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 64 27 40 35 11 21 31 229

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

416

Page 418: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

25.30 23.89 33.90 31.82 9.02 16.94 10.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 253 113 118 110 122 124 299 1139

22.21 9.92 10.36 9.66 10.71 10.89 26.25============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 20 6 141 167

4.14 5.45 25.97-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 47 20 207 274

9.73 18.18 38.12-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 78 35 72 185

16.15 31.82 13.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 54 10 32 96

11.18 9.09 5.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 153 4 27 184

31.68 3.64 4.97-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 131 35 64 230

27.12 31.82 11.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 483 110 543 1136

42.52 9.68 47.80===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

417

Page 419: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 44 20 86 23 173

18.33 4.44 32.21 9.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 72 47 118 41 278

30.00 10.44 44.19 17.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 42 70 32 55 199

17.50 15.56 11.99 23.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 27 51 5 16 99

11.25 11.33 1.87 6.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 17 154 5 13 189

7.08 34.22 1.87 5.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 38 108 21 88 255

15.83 24.00 7.87 37.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 450 267 236 1193

20.12 37.72 22.38 19.78===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

418

Page 420: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 45 47 24 32 21 174

12.20 12.86 14.29 21.05 13.06 18.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 9 83 74 25 70 18 279

21.95 23.71 22.49 21.93 28.57 15.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 4 70 55 15 34 22 200

9.76 20.00 16.72 13.16 13.88 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 5 29 31 13 14 5 97

12.20 8.29 9.42 11.40 5.71 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 5 30 49 13 57 35 189

12.20 8.57 14.89 11.40 23.27 30.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 13 93 73 24 38 14 255

31.71 26.57 22.19 21.05 15.51 12.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 350 329 114 245 115 1194

3.43 29.31 27.55 9.55 20.52 9.63======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

419

Page 421: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 40 57 11 30 35 17321.62 21.59 8.46 10.60 10.70

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 48 72 48 64 43 275

25.95 27.27 36.92 22.61 13.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 29 43 13 50 63 198

15.68 16.29 10.00 17.67 19.27-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 17 17 13 28 23 98

9.19 6.44 10.00 9.89 7.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 13 25 20 52 79 189

7.03 9.47 15.38 18.37 24.16-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 38 50 25 59 84 256

20.54 18.94 19.23 20.85 25.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 185 264 130 283 327 1189

15.56 22.20 10.93 23.80 27.50=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 136 12 20 2 0 0 3 173

18.92 7.89 7.38 9.09 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 190 15 50 11 2 5 6 279

26.43 9.87 18.45 50.00 66.67 38.46 42.86

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

420

Page 422: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 109 23 53 7 1 1 5 199

15.16 15.13 19.56 31.82 33.33 7.69 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 50 16 31 0 0 1 0 98

6.95 10.53 11.44 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 125 21 39 1 0 4 0 190

17.39 13.82 14.39 4.55 0.00 30.77 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 109 65 78 1 0 2 0 255

15.16 42.76 28.78 4.55 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 152 271 22 3 13 14 1194

60.22 12.73 22.70 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 107 1 14 19 30 0 171

16.61 4.35 9.52 29.23 11.90 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 186 1 29 14 38 9 277

28.88 4.35 19.73 21.54 15.08 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 105 8 19 9 45 12 198

16.30 34.78 12.93 13.85 17.86 21.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 0 14 5 27 7 98

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

421

Page 423: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.99 0.00 9.52 7.69 10.71 12.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 98 1 39 8 29 15 190

15.22 4.35 26.53 12.31 11.51 26.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 103 12 32 10 83 14 254

15.99 52.17 21.77 15.38 32.94 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 147 65 252 57 1188

54.21 1.94 12.37 5.47 21.21 4.80=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 84 90 174

14.97 14.26-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 148 130 278

26.38 20.60-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 82 116 198

14.62 18.38-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 50 48 98

8.91 7.61-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 98 91 189

17.47 14.42-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

422

Page 424: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 99 156 25517.65 24.72

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 561 631 1192

47.06 52.94===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 45 83 45 173

12.75 14.07 18.29---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 58 151 69 278

16.43 25.59 28.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 51 105 43 199

14.45 17.80 17.48---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 38 46 15 99

10.76 7.80 6.10---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 84 85 20 189

23.80 14.41 8.13---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 77 120 54 251

21.81 20.34 21.95---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 353 590 246 1189

29.69 49.62 20.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

423

Page 425: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 41 60 17 12 43 173

16.60 16.35 13.93 11.11 12.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 51 74 28 21 104 278

20.65 20.16 22.95 19.44 29.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 46 56 18 16 63 199

18.62 15.26 14.75 14.81 18.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 18 35 21 9 16 99

7.29 9.54 17.21 8.33 4.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 53 65 13 31 27 189

21.46 17.71 10.66 28.70 7.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 38 77 25 19 95 254

15.38 20.98 20.49 17.59 27.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 247 367 122 108 348 1192

20.72 30.79 10.23 9.06 29.19========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

424

Page 426: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 17 27 82 47 173

8.63 8.65 17.86 21.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 39 61 113 65 278

19.80 19.55 24.62 29.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 36 68 65 29 198

18.27 21.79 14.16 13.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 19 31 34 14 98

9.64 9.94 7.41 6.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 16 39 90 44 189

8.12 12.50 19.61 19.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 70 86 75 24 255

35.53 27.56 16.34 10.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 459 223 1191

16.54 26.20 38.54 18.72==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

425

Page 427: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35A. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Public Education

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 50 83 75 162 27 21 11 429

83.33 80.58 78.12 45.25 22.13 9.01 5.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 1 6 4 56 65 177 177 486

1.67 5.83 4.17 15.64 53.28 75.97 82.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

426

Page 428: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 9 14 17 140 30 35 26 27115.00 13.59 17.71 39.11 24.59 15.02 12.15

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 103 96 358 122 233 214 1186

5.06 8.68 8.09 30.19 10.29 19.65 18.04===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 209 162 59 430

80.08 45.25 10.39---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 12 56 419 487

4.60 15.64 73.77---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 40 140 90 270

15.33 39.11 15.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 358 568 1187

21.99 30.16 47.85=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

427

Page 429: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 178 69 94 31 11 21 14 418

69.53 62.16 78.99 27.68 9.09 16.94 4.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 24 12 4 29 89 74 245 477

9.38 10.81 3.36 25.89 73.55 59.68 83.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 30 21 52 21 29 35 242

21.09 27.03 17.65 46.43 17.36 23.39 11.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 111 119 112 121 124 294 1137

22.52 9.76 10.47 9.85 10.64 10.91 25.86================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 341 31 46 418

70.31 27.68 8.52-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 39 29 408 476

8.04 25.89 75.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 105 52 86 243

21.65 46.43 15.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 112 540 1137

42.66 9.85 47.49=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

428

Page 430: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 341 10 39 432

17.72 75.61 3.76 16.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 140 33 229 87 489

59.07 7.32 86.09 36.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 55 77 27 112 271

23.21 17.07 10.15 47.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 451 266 238 1192

19.88 37.84 22.32 19.97===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 6 110 108 47 104 56 431

15.00 31.25 33.03 42.34 42.11 49.12----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 17 137 141 41 108 45 489

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

429

Page 431: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.50 38.92 43.12 36.94 43.72 39.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 17 105 78 23 35 13 271

42.50 29.83 23.85 20.72 14.17 11.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 327 111 247 114 1191

3.36 29.55 27.46 9.32 20.74 9.57==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 55 47 136 151 431

22.34 20.83 37.01 48.57 46.18-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 110 137 57 88 92 484

58.51 51.89 44.88 31.43 28.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 36 72 23 56 84 271

19.15 27.27 18.11 20.00 25.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 264 127 280 327 1186

15.85 22.26 10.71 23.61 27.57=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

430

Page 432: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 218 81 109 12 0 8 3 431

30.49 52.26 40.82 54.55 0.00 57.14 20.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 363 18 84 6 3 4 10 488

50.77 11.61 31.46 27.27 100.00 28.57 66.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 134 56 74 4 0 2 2 272

18.74 36.13 27.72 18.18 0.00 14.29 13.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 155 267 22 3 14 15 1191

60.03 13.01 22.42 1.85 0.25 1.18 1.26==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 212 2 69 17 100 30 430

33.07 8.70 46.00 26.15 39.53 52.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 314 7 52 36 68 11 488

48.99 30.43 34.67 55.38 26.88 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 115 14 29 12 85 16 271

17.94 60.87 19.33 18.46 33.60 28.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 641 23 150 65 253 57 1189

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

431

Page 433: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.91 1.93 12.62 5.47 21.28 4.79=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 211 220 431

37.88 34.70-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 243 245 488

43.63 38.64-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 103 169 272

18.49 26.66-----------------------------------------------Total 557 634 1191

46.77 53.23===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 154 218 59 431

43.50 37.20 23.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

432

Page 434: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 102 259 128 489

28.81 44.20 51.61---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 98 109 61 268

27.68 18.60 24.60---------------------------------------------------------Total 354 586 248 1188

29.80 49.33 20.88=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 101 140 41 60 88 430

40.40 38.46 33.88 56.07 25.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 96 142 56 26 169 489

38.40 39.01 46.28 24.30 48.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 53 82 24 21 92 272

21.20 22.53 19.83 19.63 26.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 364 121 107 349 1191

20.99 30.56 10.16 8.98 29.30============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

433

Page 435: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 67 122 167 74 430

34.90 39.10 36.23 32.89--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 56 99 211 122 488

29.17 31.73 45.77 54.22--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 69 91 83 29 272

35.94 29.17 18.00 12.89--------------------------------------------------------------Total 192 312 461 225 1190

16.13 26.22 38.74 18.91==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

434

Page 436: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35B. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Economy

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 47 83 56 112 15 12 11 336

77.05 79.81 58.33 31.37 12.00 5.19 5.16-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 2 4 14 98 82 192 184 576

3.28 3.85 14.58 27.45 65.60 83.12 86.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

435

Page 437: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 12 17 26 147 28 27 18 27519.67 16.35 27.08 41.18 22.40 11.69 8.45

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 96 357 125 231 213 1187

5.14 8.76 8.09 30.08 10.53 19.46 17.94===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 186 112 39 337

71.26 31.37 6.84---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 20 98 458 576

7.66 27.45 80.35---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 55 147 73 275

21.07 41.18 12.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 357 570 1188

21.97 30.05 47.98=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

436

Page 438: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 176 53 73 13 3 8 2 328

69.02 47.75 61.86 11.50 2.48 6.45 0.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 18 26 15 44 105 87 267 562

7.06 23.42 12.71 38.94 86.78 70.16 90.20------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 61 32 30 56 13 29 27 248

23.92 28.83 25.42 49.56 10.74 23.39 9.12------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 111 118 113 121 124 296 1138

22.41 9.75 10.37 9.93 10.63 10.90 26.01================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 302 13 13 328

62.27 11.50 2.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 60 44 459 563

12.37 38.94 84.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 123 56 69 248

25.36 49.56 12.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 541 1139

42.58 9.92 47.50=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

437

Page 439: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 13 300 5 19 337

5.44 66.67 1.88 7.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 177 51 241 111 580

74.06 11.33 90.60 46.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 49 99 20 108 276

20.50 22.00 7.52 45.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 450 266 238 1193

20.03 37.72 22.30 19.95===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 9 78 91 37 84 38 337

21.95 22.16 27.58 33.33 34.01 33.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 175 160 51 119 59 579

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

438

Page 440: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 49.72 48.48 45.95 48.18 52.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 17 99 79 23 44 16 278

41.46 28.12 23.94 20.72 17.81 14.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 330 111 247 113 1194

3.43 29.48 27.64 9.30 20.69 9.46==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 39 40 40 85 134 338

20.86 15.09 31.01 30.04 40.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 157 66 140 103 575

58.29 59.25 51.16 49.47 31.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 39 68 23 58 90 278

20.86 25.66 17.83 20.49 27.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 129 283 327 1191

15.70 22.25 10.83 23.76 27.46=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

439

Page 441: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 159 78 87 4 0 6 3 337

22.21 50.32 32.46 18.18 0.00 46.15 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 419 17 109 14 3 6 10 578

58.52 10.97 40.67 63.64 100.00 46.15 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 138 60 72 4 0 1 1 276

19.27 38.71 26.87 18.18 0.00 7.69 7.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 268 22 3 13 14 1191

60.12 13.01 22.50 1.85 0.25 1.09 1.18==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 161 5 65 13 67 26 337

25.00 20.83 43.33 20.00 26.48 45.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 366 7 57 38 96 15 579

56.83 29.17 38.00 58.46 37.94 26.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 117 12 28 14 90 16 277

18.17 50.00 18.67 21.54 35.57 28.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 24 150 65 253 57 1193

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

440

Page 442: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.98 2.01 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.78=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 150 187 337

26.83 29.45-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 309 271 580

55.28 42.68-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 100 177 277

17.89 27.87-----------------------------------------------Total 559 635 1194

46.82 53.18===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 136 156 44 336

38.42 26.58 17.74

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

441

Page 443: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 124 307 148 579

35.03 52.30 59.68---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 94 124 56 274

26.55 21.12 22.58---------------------------------------------------------Total 354 587 248 1189

29.77 49.37 20.86=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 81 111 28 49 68 337

32.40 30.41 23.14 45.79 19.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 115 163 71 36 194 579

46.00 44.66 58.68 33.64 55.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 91 22 22 88 277

21.60 24.93 18.18 20.56 25.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 365 121 107 350 1193

20.96 30.60 10.14 8.97 29.34============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

442

Page 444: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 98 140 57 337

21.76 31.31 30.37 25.11--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 76 129 233 142 580

39.38 41.21 50.54 62.56--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 75 86 88 28 277

38.86 27.48 19.09 12.33--------------------------------------------------------------Total 193 313 461 227 1194

16.16 26.21 38.61 19.01==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

443

Page 445: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35C. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Immigration

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 81 70 134 20 13 10 377

80.33 77.88 72.92 37.54 16.13 5.60 4.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 1 4 5 76 71 186 184 527

1.64 3.85 5.21 21.29 57.26 80.17 86.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

444

Page 446: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 11 19 21 147 33 33 19 28318.03 18.27 21.88 41.18 26.61 14.22 8.92

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 96 357 124 232 213 1187

5.14 8.76 8.09 30.08 10.45 19.55 17.94===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 200 134 43 377

76.63 37.54 7.56---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 10 76 441 527

3.83 21.29 77.50---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 51 147 85 283

19.54 41.18 14.94---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 357 569 1187

21.99 30.08 47.94=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

445

Page 447: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 175 58 83 20 5 14 10 365

68.36 53.21 70.34 17.86 4.13 11.29 3.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 17 17 12 35 97 81 256 515

6.64 15.60 10.17 31.25 80.17 65.32 86.49------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 64 34 23 57 19 29 30 256

25.00 31.19 19.49 50.89 15.70 23.39 10.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 109 118 112 121 124 296 1136

22.54 9.60 10.39 9.86 10.65 10.92 26.06================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 316 20 29 365

65.29 17.86 5.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 47 35 434 516

9.71 31.25 80.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 121 57 78 256

25.00 50.89 14.42-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 112 541 1137

42.57 9.85 47.58=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

446

Page 448: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 27 316 6 28 377

11.30 70.07 2.27 11.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 158 37 237 98 530

66.11 8.20 89.77 41.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 98 21 110 283

22.59 21.73 7.95 46.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 451 264 236 1190

20.08 37.90 22.18 19.83===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 8 92 96 38 91 52 377

19.51 26.14 29.27 33.93 36.99 46.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 156 151 46 115 47 530

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

447

Page 449: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 44.32 46.04 41.07 46.75 41.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 18 104 81 28 40 13 284

43.90 29.55 24.70 25.00 16.26 11.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 328 112 246 112 1191

3.44 29.55 27.54 9.40 20.65 9.40==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 43 52 39 104 139 377

22.99 19.70 30.47 37.01 42.64-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 106 141 62 117 99 525

56.68 53.41 48.44 41.64 30.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 38 71 27 60 88 284

20.32 26.89 21.09 21.35 26.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 128 281 326 1186

15.77 22.26 10.79 23.69 27.49=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

448

Page 450: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 184 73 100 12 0 4 3 376

25.73 47.10 37.31 57.14 0.00 30.77 20.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 396 17 91 7 3 6 10 530

55.38 10.97 33.96 33.33 100.00 46.15 66.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 135 65 77 2 0 3 2 284

18.88 41.94 28.73 9.52 0.00 23.08 13.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 155 268 21 3 13 15 1190

60.08 13.03 22.52 1.76 0.25 1.09 1.26==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 186 6 63 15 79 28 377

28.93 26.09 42.28 23.44 31.23 48.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 342 6 52 36 80 13 529

53.19 26.09 34.90 56.25 31.62 22.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 115 11 34 13 94 17 284

17.88 47.83 22.82 20.31 37.15 29.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 643 23 149 64 253 58 1190

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

449

Page 451: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.03 1.93 12.52 5.38 21.26 4.87=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 178 199 377

31.90 31.44-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 271 259 530

48.57 40.92-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 109 175 284

19.53 27.65-----------------------------------------------Total 558 633 1191

46.85 53.15===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 144 192 40 376

40.79 32.82 16.19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

450

Page 452: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 116 266 147 529

32.86 45.47 59.51---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 93 127 60 280

26.35 21.71 24.29---------------------------------------------------------Total 353 585 247 1185

29.79 49.37 20.84=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 88 127 32 55 74 376

35.34 34.89 26.67 50.93 21.20----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 101 150 63 29 187 530

40.56 41.21 52.50 26.85 53.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 60 87 25 24 88 284

24.10 23.90 20.83 22.22 25.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 364 120 108 349 1190

20.92 30.59 10.08 9.08 29.33============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

451

Page 453: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 53 115 145 63 376

27.60 36.74 31.59 28.00--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 61 111 224 133 529

31.77 35.46 48.80 59.11--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 78 87 90 29 284

40.62 27.80 19.61 12.89--------------------------------------------------------------Total 192 313 459 225 1189

16.15 26.32 38.60 18.92==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

452

Page 454: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35D. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Budget

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 81 53 120 18 14 8 343

79.03 78.64 56.38 33.71 14.40 6.03 3.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 3 3 17 95 79 190 185 572

4.84 2.91 18.09 26.69 63.20 81.90 86.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

453

Page 455: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 10 19 24 141 28 28 20 27016.13 18.45 25.53 39.61 22.40 12.07 9.39

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 94 356 125 232 213 1185

5.23 8.69 7.93 30.04 10.55 19.58 17.97===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 183 120 39 342

70.38 33.71 6.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 23 95 454 572

8.85 26.69 79.79---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 141 76 271

20.77 39.61 13.36---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 356 569 1185

21.94 30.04 48.02=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

454

Page 456: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 170 55 72 17 3 9 5 331

67.19 49.55 61.54 15.18 2.48 7.26 1.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 22 24 17 41 103 88 262 557

8.70 21.62 14.53 36.61 85.12 70.97 88.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 61 32 28 54 15 27 29 246

24.11 28.83 23.93 48.21 12.40 21.77 9.80------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 253 111 117 112 121 124 296 1134

22.31 9.79 10.32 9.88 10.67 10.93 26.10================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 297 17 16 330

61.62 15.18 2.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 64 41 453 558

13.28 36.61 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 121 54 71 246

25.10 48.21 13.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 540 1134

42.50 9.88 47.62=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

455

Page 457: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 14 301 6 21 342

5.88 67.34 2.26 8.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 172 50 241 111 574

72.27 11.19 90.94 46.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 52 96 18 105 271

21.85 21.48 6.79 44.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 447 265 237 1187

20.05 37.66 22.33 19.97===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 9 85 92 32 86 38 342

21.95 24.15 27.96 29.36 35.10 33.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 14 169 159 52 121 60 575

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

456

Page 458: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

34.15 48.01 48.33 47.71 49.39 53.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 18 98 78 25 38 14 271

43.90 27.84 23.71 22.94 15.51 12.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 329 109 245 112 1188

3.45 29.63 27.69 9.18 20.62 9.43==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 44 38 38 92 131 343

23.91 14.29 29.69 32.51 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 104 161 67 132 106 570

56.52 60.53 52.34 46.64 32.72-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 36 67 23 59 87 272

19.57 25.19 17.97 20.85 26.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 266 128 283 324 1185

15.53 22.45 10.80 23.88 27.34=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

457

Page 459: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 163 78 83 10 0 6 3 343

22.83 50.65 30.86 47.62 0.00 46.15 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 421 13 114 7 3 6 10 574

58.96 8.44 42.38 33.33 100.00 46.15 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 130 63 72 4 0 1 1 271

18.21 40.91 26.77 19.05 0.00 7.69 7.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 154 269 21 3 13 14 1188

60.10 12.96 22.64 1.77 0.25 1.09 1.18==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 156 2 62 12 84 26 342

24.26 8.70 41.89 18.75 33.60 45.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 375 9 57 38 80 15 574

58.32 39.13 38.51 59.38 32.00 26.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 112 12 29 14 86 16 269

17.42 52.17 19.59 21.88 34.40 28.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 643 23 148 64 250 57 1185

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

458

Page 460: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.26 1.94 12.49 5.40 21.10 4.81=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 163 179 342

29.16 28.50-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 291 283 574

52.06 45.06-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 105 166 271

18.78 26.43-----------------------------------------------Total 559 628 1187

47.09 52.91===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 131 167 44 342

37.11 28.69 17.67

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

459

Page 461: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 129 297 148 574

36.54 51.03 59.44---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 93 118 57 268

26.35 20.27 22.89---------------------------------------------------------Total 353 582 249 1184

29.81 49.16 21.03=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 77 121 27 48 69 342

30.80 33.33 22.69 44.44 19.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 121 158 70 33 193 575

48.40 43.53 58.82 30.56 55.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 52 84 22 27 86 271

20.80 23.14 18.49 25.00 24.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 363 119 108 348 1188

21.04 30.56 10.02 9.09 29.29============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

460

Page 462: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 55 96 141 51 343

28.65 30.57 30.65 22.87--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 66 133 232 143 574

34.38 42.36 50.43 64.13--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 71 85 87 29 272

36.98 27.07 18.91 13.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 192 314 460 223 1189

16.15 26.41 38.69 18.76==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

461

Page 463: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35E. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Taxes

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 47 83 57 106 18 11 10 332

77.05 79.81 58.76 29.69 14.52 4.78 4.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 1 3 13 91 75 190 183 556

1.64 2.88 13.40 25.49 60.48 82.61 85.12-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

462

Page 464: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 13 18 27 160 31 29 22 30021.31 17.31 27.84 44.82 25.00 12.61 10.23

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 97 357 124 230 215 1188

5.13 8.75 8.16 30.05 10.44 19.36 18.10===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 187 106 39 332

71.37 29.69 6.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 17 91 448 556

6.49 25.49 78.73---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 58 160 82 300

22.14 44.82 14.41---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 357 569 1188

22.05 30.05 47.90=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

463

Page 465: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 167 55 67 17 3 3 11 323

65.49 50.00 55.83 15.04 2.50 2.44 3.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 22 18 19 39 101 84 258 541

8.63 16.36 15.83 34.51 84.17 68.29 86.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 66 37 34 57 16 36 28 274

25.88 33.64 28.33 50.44 13.33 29.27 9.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 110 120 113 120 123 297 1138

22.41 9.67 10.54 9.93 10.54 10.81 26.10================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 290 17 17 324

59.67 15.04 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 59 39 444 542

12.14 34.51 82.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 137 57 79 273

28.19 50.44 14.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 540 1139

42.67 9.92 47.41=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

464

Page 466: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 20 290 4 19 333

8.44 64.16 1.50 8.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 159 51 242 107 559

67.09 11.28 90.64 45.15---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 58 111 21 111 301

24.47 24.56 7.87 46.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 452 267 237 1193

19.87 37.89 22.38 19.87===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 8 80 89 35 82 38 332

19.51 22.79 27.13 31.53 33.33 33.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 16 157 151 54 122 59 559

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

465

Page 467: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

39.02 44.73 46.04 48.65 49.59 52.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 17 114 88 22 42 16 299

41.46 32.48 26.83 19.82 17.07 14.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 328 111 246 113 1190

3.45 29.50 27.56 9.33 20.67 9.50==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 34 43 37 85 134 333

18.18 16.23 28.91 30.14 41.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 112 149 62 132 100 555

59.89 56.23 48.44 46.81 30.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 41 73 29 65 92 300

21.93 27.55 22.66 23.05 28.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 128 282 326 1188

15.74 22.31 10.77 23.74 27.44=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

466

Page 468: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 168 76 76 4 0 6 3 333

23.50 48.72 28.15 19.05 0.00 42.86 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 406 18 102 13 3 6 10 558

56.78 11.54 37.78 61.90 100.00 42.86 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 141 62 92 4 0 2 1 302

19.72 39.74 34.07 19.05 0.00 14.29 7.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 270 21 3 14 14 1193

59.93 13.08 22.63 1.76 0.25 1.17 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 154 4 60 14 76 25 333

23.99 16.67 40.00 22.22 29.92 43.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 358 6 55 36 87 16 558

55.76 25.00 36.67 57.14 34.25 27.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 130 14 35 13 91 17 300

20.25 58.33 23.33 20.63 35.83 29.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 24 150 63 254 58 1191

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

467

Page 469: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.90 2.02 12.59 5.29 21.33 4.87=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 161 172 333

28.80 27.13-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 290 269 559

51.88 42.43-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 108 193 301

19.32 30.44-----------------------------------------------Total 559 634 1193

46.86 53.14===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 130 153 49 332

36.72 26.02 19.92

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

468

Page 470: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 126 296 136 558

35.59 50.34 55.28---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 98 139 61 298

27.68 23.64 24.80---------------------------------------------------------Total 354 588 246 1188

29.80 49.49 20.71=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 73 116 26 48 71 334

29.20 31.87 21.49 44.44 20.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 156 73 36 184 558

43.60 42.86 60.33 33.33 52.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 68 92 22 24 95 301

27.20 25.27 18.18 22.22 27.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 364 121 108 350 1193

20.96 30.51 10.14 9.05 29.34============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

469

Page 471: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 45 99 135 54 333

23.32 31.63 29.28 24.00--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 71 123 229 135 558

36.79 39.30 49.67 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 77 91 97 36 301

39.90 29.07 21.04 16.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 193 313 461 225 1192

16.19 26.26 38.67 18.88==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

470

Page 472: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35F. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Ethics in Government

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 79 75 137 20 11 12 383

79.03 76.70 77.32 38.48 16.00 4.74 5.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 3 7 5 79 73 186 182 535

4.84 6.80 5.15 22.19 58.40 80.17 84.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

471

Page 473: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 10 17 17 140 32 35 21 27216.13 16.50 17.53 39.33 25.60 15.09 9.77

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 356 125 232 215 1190

5.21 8.66 8.15 29.92 10.50 19.50 18.07===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 203 137 42 382

77.48 38.48 7.36---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 79 441 535

5.73 22.19 77.23---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 44 140 88 272

16.79 39.33 15.41---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 356 571 1189

22.04 29.94 48.02=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

472

Page 474: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 172 57 88 26 9 14 8 374

67.19 51.82 73.95 23.42 7.44 11.29 2.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 30 20 7 29 95 83 255 519

11.72 18.18 5.88 26.13 78.51 66.94 85.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 33 24 56 17 27 34 245

21.09 30.00 20.17 50.45 14.05 21.77 11.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 110 119 111 121 124 297 1138

22.50 9.67 10.46 9.75 10.63 10.90 26.10================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 316 26 31 373

65.29 23.42 5.72-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 58 29 433 520

11.98 26.13 79.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 110 56 78 244

22.73 50.45 14.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 111 542 1137

42.57 9.76 47.67=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

473

Page 475: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 29 322 4 27 382

12.18 71.40 1.50 11.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 156 46 239 97 538

65.55 10.20 89.85 40.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 53 83 23 113 272

22.27 18.40 8.65 47.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 451 266 237 1192

19.97 37.84 22.32 19.88===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 11 93 95 39 94 50 382

26.83 26.35 29.05 35.14 38.21 43.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 158 149 52 115 49 538

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

474

Page 476: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 44.76 45.57 46.85 46.75 42.98----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 15 102 83 20 37 15 272

36.59 28.90 25.38 18.02 15.04 13.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 327 111 246 114 1192

3.44 29.61 27.43 9.31 20.64 9.56==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 41 47 44 107 144 383

21.81 17.67 34.65 37.94 44.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 149 61 117 96 532

57.98 56.02 48.03 41.49 29.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 38 70 22 58 85 273

20.21 26.32 17.32 20.57 26.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 127 282 325 1188

15.82 22.39 10.69 23.74 27.36=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

475

Page 477: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 194 76 98 5 0 6 3 382

27.09 48.72 36.57 23.81 0.00 42.86 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 387 19 98 14 3 7 10 538

54.05 12.18 36.57 66.67 100.00 50.00 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 135 61 72 2 0 1 1 272

18.85 39.10 26.87 9.52 0.00 7.14 7.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 268 21 3 14 14 1192

60.07 13.09 22.48 1.76 0.25 1.17 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 184 4 69 17 81 28 383

28.57 17.39 46.00 26.15 32.02 48.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 340 8 51 37 87 14 537

52.80 34.78 34.00 56.92 34.39 24.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 120 11 30 11 85 16 273

18.63 47.83 20.00 16.92 33.60 27.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 150 65 253 58 1193

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

476

Page 478: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 174 208 382

31.13 32.81-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 285 253 538

50.98 39.91-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 100 173 273

17.89 27.29-----------------------------------------------Total 559 634 1193

46.86 53.14===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 143 192 47 382

40.51 32.71 18.95

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

477

Page 479: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 117 275 145 537

33.14 46.85 58.47---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 93 120 56 269

26.35 20.44 22.58---------------------------------------------------------Total 353 587 248 1188

29.71 49.41 20.88=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 84 136 33 58 71 382

33.60 37.57 27.50 54.21 20.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 110 144 63 28 191 536

44.00 39.78 52.50 26.17 54.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 56 82 24 21 89 272

22.40 22.65 20.00 19.63 25.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 362 120 107 351 1190

21.01 30.42 10.08 8.99 29.50============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

478

Page 480: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 52 106 158 66 382

27.08 33.97 34.27 29.07--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 68 120 216 133 537

35.42 38.46 46.85 58.59--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 72 86 87 28 273

37.50 27.56 18.87 12.33--------------------------------------------------------------Total 192 312 461 227 1192

16.11 26.17 38.67 19.04==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

479

Page 481: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35G. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Transportation

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 80 62 126 18 9 8 352

79.03 77.67 65.26 35.59 14.52 3.88 3.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 2 5 11 74 66 181 179 518

3.23 4.85 11.58 20.90 53.23 78.02 83.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

480

Page 482: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 11 18 22 154 40 42 27 31417.74 17.48 23.16 43.50 32.26 18.10 12.62

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 95 354 124 232 214 1184

5.24 8.70 8.02 29.90 10.47 19.59 18.07===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 192 126 36 354

73.28 35.59 6.32---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 19 74 426 519

7.25 20.90 74.74---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 51 154 108 313

19.47 43.50 18.95---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 354 570 1186

22.09 29.85 48.06=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

481

Page 483: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 170 50 85 17 6 8 9 345

66.93 45.45 70.83 15.18 4.96 6.45 3.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 21 26 3 35 89 86 245 505

8.27 23.64 2.50 31.25 73.55 69.35 82.77------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 63 34 32 60 26 30 42 287

24.80 30.91 26.67 53.57 21.49 24.19 14.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 110 120 112 121 124 296 1137

22.34 9.67 10.55 9.85 10.64 10.91 26.03================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 304 17 23 344

62.94 15.18 4.25-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 50 35 420 505

10.35 31.25 77.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 129 60 98 287

26.71 53.57 18.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 483 112 541 1136

42.52 9.86 47.62=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

482

Page 484: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 21 302 6 24 353

8.86 67.26 2.26 10.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 161 46 227 87 521

67.93 10.24 85.34 36.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 55 101 33 125 314

23.21 22.49 12.41 52.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 449 266 236 1188

19.95 37.79 22.39 19.87===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 11 88 88 38 85 43 353

26.83 25.00 26.83 35.19 34.55 37.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 148 151 46 110 52 522

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

483

Page 485: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 42.05 46.04 42.59 44.72 45.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 15 116 89 24 51 19 314

36.59 32.95 27.13 22.22 20.73 16.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 328 108 246 114 1189

3.45 29.60 27.59 9.08 20.69 9.59==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 35 46 34 102 138 355

18.82 17.36 26.77 36.17 42.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 99 143 62 113 99 516

53.23 53.96 48.82 40.07 30.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 52 76 31 67 89 315

27.96 28.68 24.41 23.76 27.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 127 282 326 1186

15.68 22.34 10.71 23.78 27.49=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

484

Page 486: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 171 74 89 11 0 5 3 353

23.92 48.68 33.21 52.38 0.00 38.46 20.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 381 17 98 6 3 5 10 520

53.29 11.18 36.57 28.57 100.00 38.46 66.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 163 61 81 4 0 3 2 314

22.80 40.13 30.22 19.05 0.00 23.08 13.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 152 268 21 3 13 15 1187

60.24 12.81 22.58 1.77 0.25 1.10 1.26==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 167 5 61 13 83 24 353

25.97 21.74 40.40 20.31 33.20 42.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 335 7 50 35 80 13 520

52.10 30.43 33.11 54.69 32.00 22.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 141 11 40 16 87 20 315

21.93 47.83 26.49 25.00 34.80 35.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 643 23 151 64 250 57 1188

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

485

Page 487: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.12 1.94 12.71 5.39 21.04 4.80=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 170 183 353

30.41 29.05-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 272 249 521

48.66 39.52-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 117 198 315

20.93 31.43-----------------------------------------------Total 559 630 1189

47.01 52.99===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 138 168 47 353

39.09 28.82 18.88

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

486

Page 488: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 111 272 137 520

31.44 46.66 55.02---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 104 143 65 312

29.46 24.53 26.10---------------------------------------------------------Total 353 583 249 1185

29.79 49.20 21.01=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 87 121 26 48 72 354

34.80 33.33 21.85 44.44 20.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 96 142 65 35 184 522

38.40 39.12 54.62 32.41 52.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 67 100 28 25 95 315

26.80 27.55 23.53 23.15 27.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 363 119 108 351 1191

20.99 30.48 9.99 9.07 29.47============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

487

Page 489: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 50 105 143 55 353

26.18 33.76 31.02 24.55--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 72 106 214 129 521

37.70 34.08 46.42 57.59--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 69 100 104 40 313

36.13 32.15 22.56 17.86--------------------------------------------------------------Total 191 311 461 224 1187

16.09 26.20 38.84 18.87==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

488

Page 490: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35H. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Higher Education

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 82 74 155 26 12 14 412

80.33 79.61 76.29 43.66 20.97 5.19 6.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 3 5 5 63 61 183 178 498

4.92 4.85 5.15 17.75 49.19 79.22 82.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

489

Page 491: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 9 16 18 137 37 36 23 27614.75 15.53 18.56 38.59 29.84 15.58 10.70

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 103 97 355 124 231 215 1186

5.14 8.68 8.18 29.93 10.46 19.48 18.13===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 205 155 52 412

78.24 43.66 9.14---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 14 63 422 499

5.34 17.75 74.17---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 43 137 95 275

16.41 38.59 16.70---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 355 569 1186

22.09 29.93 47.98=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

490

Page 492: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 180 69 91 26 10 17 10 403

70.31 62.73 77.12 23.21 8.26 13.82 3.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 23 13 0 30 91 79 248 484

8.98 11.82 0.00 26.79 75.21 64.23 83.50------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 53 28 27 56 20 27 39 250

20.70 25.45 22.88 50.00 16.53 21.95 13.13------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 110 118 112 121 123 297 1137

22.52 9.67 10.38 9.85 10.64 10.82 26.12================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 340 26 37 403

70.10 23.21 6.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 36 30 418 484

7.42 26.79 77.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 109 56 86 251

22.47 50.00 15.90-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 112 541 1138

42.62 9.84 47.54=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

491

Page 493: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 36 339 6 32 413

15.00 75.17 2.26 13.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 147 32 232 90 501

61.25 7.10 87.55 38.46---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 57 80 27 112 276

23.75 17.74 10.19 47.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 451 265 234 1190

20.17 37.90 22.27 19.66===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 8 107 104 48 97 48 412

19.51 30.66 31.52 43.24 39.43 42.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 16 136 144 42 112 51 501

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

492

Page 494: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

39.02 38.97 43.64 37.84 45.53 45.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 17 106 82 21 37 14 277

41.46 30.37 24.85 18.92 15.04 12.39----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 349 330 111 246 113 1190

3.45 29.33 27.73 9.33 20.67 9.50==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 51 43 129 147 412

22.34 19.54 33.33 45.91 44.95-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 104 148 56 94 95 497

55.32 56.70 43.41 33.45 29.05-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 42 62 30 58 85 277

22.34 23.75 23.26 20.64 25.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 261 129 281 327 1186

15.85 22.01 10.88 23.69 27.57=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

493

Page 495: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 205 82 102 13 0 8 3 413

28.59 52.56 38.20 61.90 0.00 61.54 20.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 372 18 89 6 3 4 10 502

51.88 11.54 33.33 28.57 100.00 30.77 66.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 140 56 76 2 0 1 2 277

19.53 35.90 28.46 9.52 0.00 7.69 13.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 156 267 21 3 13 15 1192

60.15 13.09 22.40 1.76 0.25 1.09 1.26==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 200 5 67 15 97 29 413

31.30 20.83 44.67 23.08 38.19 50.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 326 7 52 36 68 11 500

51.02 29.17 34.67 55.38 26.77 18.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 113 12 31 14 89 18 277

17.68 50.00 20.67 21.54 35.04 31.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 639 24 150 65 254 58 1190

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

494

Page 496: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.70 2.02 12.61 5.46 21.34 4.87=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 202 210 412

36.01 33.39-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 250 251 501

44.56 39.90-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 109 168 277

19.43 26.71-----------------------------------------------Total 561 629 1190

47.14 52.86===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 150 202 60 412

42.37 34.47 24.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

495

Page 497: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 103 270 128 501

29.10 46.08 51.82---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 101 114 59 274

28.53 19.45 23.89---------------------------------------------------------Total 354 586 247 1187

29.82 49.37 20.81=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 96 136 36 53 92 413

38.40 37.57 29.75 49.53 26.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 104 139 58 32 168 501

41.60 38.40 47.93 29.91 48.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 50 87 27 22 90 276

20.00 24.03 22.31 20.56 25.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 362 121 107 350 1190

21.01 30.42 10.17 8.99 29.41============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

496

Page 498: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 62 120 161 70 413

32.12 38.71 35.00 30.84--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 58 99 216 127 500

30.05 31.94 46.96 55.95--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 73 91 83 30 277

37.82 29.35 18.04 13.22--------------------------------------------------------------Total 193 310 460 227 1190

16.22 26.05 38.66 19.08==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

497

Page 499: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Policy Questions

Q36A. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Creating a School Voucher Program

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 7 8 13 60 31 98 91 308

11.67 7.77 13.54 16.85 25.20 42.24 41.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 5 13 20 102 44 66 51 301

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

498

Page 500: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

8.33 12.62 20.83 28.65 35.77 28.45 23.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 12 13 15 62 15 32 15 164

20.00 12.62 15.62 17.42 12.20 13.79 6.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 27 41 35 48 13 12 24 200

45.00 39.81 36.46 13.48 10.57 5.17 11.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 28 13 84 20 24 36 214

15.00 27.18 13.54 23.60 16.26 10.34 16.59----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 103 96 356 123 232 217 1187

5.05 8.68 8.09 29.99 10.36 19.55 18.28==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 28 60 220 308

10.77 16.85 38.46--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 39 102 161 302

15.00 28.65 28.15--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 40 62 62 164

15.38 17.42 10.84--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 103 48 49 200

39.62 13.48 8.57--------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

499

Page 501: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 50 84 80 21419.23 23.60 13.99

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 356 572 1188

21.89 29.97 48.15====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 40 22 13 23 46 35 116 295

15.75 19.47 11.21 20.54 38.66 28.00 39.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 53 31 22 30 39 28 80 283

20.87 27.43 18.97 26.79 32.77 22.40 27.12-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 36 19 25 17 13 17 31 158

14.17 16.81 21.55 15.18 10.92 13.60 10.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 79 16 37 11 8 22 28 201

31.10 14.16 31.90 9.82 6.72 17.60 9.49-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 46 25 19 31 13 23 40 197

18.11 22.12 16.38 27.68 10.92 18.40 13.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 116 112 119 125 295 1134

22.40 9.96 10.23 9.88 10.49 11.02 26.01===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

500

Page 502: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 75 23 197 295

15.56 20.54 36.41----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 106 30 148 284

21.99 26.79 27.36----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 80 17 61 158

16.60 15.18 11.28----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 132 11 58 201

27.39 9.82 10.72----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 89 31 77 197

18.46 27.68 14.23----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 541 1135

42.47 9.87 47.67======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

501

Page 503: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Extremely effective 58 67 129 54 30824.27 14.92 48.50 22.88

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 82 95 69 58 304

34.31 21.16 25.94 24.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 37 76 23 27 163

15.48 16.93 8.65 11.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 29 139 20 13 201

12.13 30.96 7.52 5.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 72 25 84 214

13.81 16.04 9.40 35.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 449 266 236 1190

20.08 37.73 22.35 19.83==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 10 86 79 39 66 29 309

25.00 24.50 24.31 34.51 26.83 25.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 9 105 86 28 51 23 302

22.50 29.91 26.46 24.78 20.73 20.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 12 37 40 12 42 19 162

30.00 10.54 12.31 10.62 17.07 16.52

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

502

Page 504: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 2 31 57 21 54 36 201

5.00 8.83 17.54 18.58 21.95 31.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 92 63 13 33 8 216

17.50 26.21 19.38 11.50 13.41 6.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 325 113 246 115 1190

3.36 29.50 27.31 9.50 20.67 9.66=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 74 66 38 50 78 306

39.78 25.00 28.79 18.05 23.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 48 93 31 86 43 301

25.81 35.23 23.48 31.05 13.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 22 39 22 38 42 163

11.83 14.77 16.67 13.72 12.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 17 26 20 49 89 201

9.14 9.85 15.15 17.69 27.30------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 40 21 54 74 214

13.44 15.15 15.91 19.49 22.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 264 132 277 326 1185

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

503

Page 505: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.70 22.28 11.14 23.38 27.51========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 192 39 64 4 2 0 8 309

26.89 25.32 23.62 18.18 66.67 0.00 53.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 162 36 80 14 1 6 4 303

22.69 23.38 29.52 63.64 33.33 50.00 26.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 100 20 38 1 0 4 0 163

14.01 12.99 14.02 4.55 0.00 33.33 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 144 19 33 2 0 1 3 202

20.17 12.34 12.18 9.09 0.00 8.33 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 116 40 56 1 0 1 0 214

16.25 25.97 20.66 4.55 0.00 8.33 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 154 271 22 3 12 15 1191

59.95 12.93 22.75 1.85 0.25 1.01 1.26=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

504

Page 506: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 190 5 27 17 60 11 310

29.28 20.83 18.37 25.76 23.90 18.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 164 10 31 15 72 11 303

25.27 41.67 21.09 22.73 28.69 18.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 88 1 25 14 28 9 165

13.56 4.17 17.01 21.21 11.16 15.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 107 1 38 8 38 10 202

16.49 4.17 25.85 12.12 15.14 17.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 100 7 26 12 53 17 215

15.41 29.17 17.69 18.18 21.12 29.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 147 66 251 58 1195

54.31 2.01 12.30 5.52 21.00 4.85========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 158 150 308

28.37 23.70----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 139 165 304

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

505

Page 507: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

24.96 26.07----------------------------------------------Not very effective 68 95 163

12.21 15.01----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 94 107 201

16.88 16.90----------------------------------------------Don't know 98 116 214

17.59 18.33----------------------------------------------Total 557 633 1190

46.81 53.19==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 95 152 62 309

26.84 25.89 25.20--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 87 139 73 299

24.58 23.68 29.67--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 59 65 40 164

16.67 11.07 16.26--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 53 120 28 201

14.97 20.44 11.38--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

506

Page 508: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 60 111 43 21416.95 18.91 17.48

--------------------------------------------------------Total 354 587 246 1187

29.82 49.45 20.72========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 62 99 42 18 88 309

24.80 27.05 35.29 17.14 25.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 62 86 40 27 88 303

24.80 23.50 33.61 25.71 25.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 47 37 9 14 56 163

18.80 10.11 7.56 13.33 15.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 44 71 15 31 42 203

17.60 19.40 12.61 29.52 11.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 35 73 13 15 77 213

14.00 19.95 10.92 14.29 21.94---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 119 105 351 1191

20.99 30.73 9.99 8.82 29.47===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

507

Page 509: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 47 82 123 56 308

23.86 26.45 26.97 24.67-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 54 80 113 56 303

27.41 25.81 24.78 24.67-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 33 34 62 34 163

16.75 10.97 13.60 14.98-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 49 96 37 201

9.64 15.81 21.05 16.30-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 44 65 62 44 215

22.34 20.97 13.60 19.38-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 310 456 227 1190

16.55 26.05 38.32 19.08=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

508

Page 510: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36B. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Expanding the Number of Charter Schools

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 6 6 9 61 24 73 75 254

9.68 5.77 9.38 17.04 19.35 31.47 34.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 6 22 21 103 46 96 65 359

9.68 21.15 21.88 28.77 37.10 41.38 29.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

509

Page 511: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 14 26 24 64 19 34 28 20922.58 25.00 25.00 17.88 15.32 14.66 12.84

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 20 24 24 46 12 11 11 148

32.26 23.08 25.00 12.85 9.68 4.74 5.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 26 18 84 23 18 39 224

25.81 25.00 18.75 23.46 18.55 7.76 17.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 358 124 232 218 1194

5.19 8.71 8.04 29.98 10.39 19.43 18.26==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 20 61 172 253

7.60 17.04 30.02--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 49 103 207 359

18.63 28.77 36.13--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 65 64 82 211

24.71 17.88 14.31--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 69 46 33 148

26.24 12.85 5.76--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 84 79 223

22.81 23.46 13.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

510

Page 512: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 573 1194

22.03 29.98 47.99====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 38 22 13 20 39 27 88 247

14.90 19.30 10.92 17.86 32.23 21.95 29.53-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 64 30 24 32 50 37 108 345

25.10 26.32 20.17 28.57 41.32 30.08 36.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 42 19 33 30 13 22 45 204

16.47 16.67 27.73 26.79 10.74 17.89 15.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 55 17 27 11 9 14 14 147

21.57 14.91 22.69 9.82 7.44 11.38 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 56 26 22 19 10 23 43 199

21.96 22.81 18.49 16.96 8.26 18.70 14.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 112 121 123 298 1142

22.33 9.98 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.77 26.09===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

511

Page 513: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 72 20 154 246

14.78 17.86 28.31----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 118 32 196 346

24.23 28.57 36.03----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 94 30 80 204

19.30 26.79 14.71----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 99 11 38 148

20.33 9.82 6.99----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 104 19 76 199

21.36 16.96 13.97----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 112 544 1143

42.61 9.80 47.59======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 53 63 99 39 254

22.08 13.91 37.22 16.46

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

512

Page 514: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 80 118 99 62 359

33.33 26.05 37.22 26.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 51 85 32 44 212

21.25 18.76 12.03 18.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 102 14 13 148

7.92 22.52 5.26 5.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 85 22 79 223

15.42 18.76 8.27 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 266 237 1196

20.07 37.88 22.24 19.82==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 7 78 64 33 53 20 255

17.07 22.10 19.34 28.95 21.54 17.54---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 13 111 100 29 71 36 360

31.71 31.44 30.21 25.44 28.86 31.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 5 63 59 19 40 26 212

12.20 17.85 17.82 16.67 16.26 22.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 30 34 16 39 22 149

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

513

Page 515: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

19.51 8.50 10.27 14.04 15.85 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 71 74 17 43 10 223

19.51 20.11 22.36 14.91 17.48 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 331 114 246 114 1199

3.42 29.44 27.61 9.51 20.52 9.51=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 52 62 31 52 55 252

27.81 23.31 23.66 18.44 16.82------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 56 94 44 90 75 359

29.95 35.34 33.59 31.91 22.94------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 24 46 24 53 64 211

12.83 17.29 18.32 18.79 19.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 18 10 39 62 148

10.16 6.77 7.63 13.83 18.96------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 46 22 48 71 223

19.25 17.29 16.79 17.02 21.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 282 327 1193

15.67 22.30 10.98 23.64 27.41========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

514

Page 516: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 154 35 55 2 2 2 5 255

21.42 22.73 20.15 8.70 66.67 13.33 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 214 42 81 13 1 5 4 360

29.76 27.27 29.67 56.52 33.33 33.33 26.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 132 16 57 3 0 5 0 213

18.36 10.39 20.88 13.04 0.00 33.33 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 91 18 34 2 0 1 3 149

12.66 11.69 12.45 8.70 0.00 6.67 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 128 43 46 3 0 2 3 225

17.80 27.92 16.85 13.04 0.00 13.33 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 154 273 23 3 15 15 1202

59.82 12.81 22.71 1.91 0.25 1.25 1.25=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

515

Page 517: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 153 5 23 15 52 6 254

23.61 22.73 15.23 23.44 20.47 10.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 195 3 42 19 84 16 359

30.09 13.64 27.81 29.69 33.07 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 112 4 31 15 36 13 211

17.28 18.18 20.53 23.44 14.17 23.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 79 0 26 5 28 10 148

12.19 0.00 17.22 7.81 11.02 17.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 109 10 29 10 54 11 223

16.82 45.45 19.21 15.62 21.26 19.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 22 151 64 254 56 1195

54.23 1.84 12.64 5.36 21.26 4.69========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 126 129 255

22.50 20.25----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 181 178 359

32.32 27.94----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

516

Page 518: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 96 115 21117.14 18.05

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 63 86 149

11.25 13.50----------------------------------------------Don't know 94 129 223

16.79 20.25----------------------------------------------Total 560 637 1197

46.78 53.22==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 73 136 44 253

20.56 23.05 17.74--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 113 168 78 359

31.83 28.47 31.45--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 66 95 51 212

18.59 16.10 20.56--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 41 80 27 148

11.55 13.56 10.89--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 111 48 221

17.46 18.81 19.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

517

Page 519: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 355 590 248 1193

29.76 49.46 20.79========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 52 84 31 16 71 254

20.80 22.89 25.41 15.09 20.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 72 109 43 26 109 359

28.80 29.70 35.25 24.53 31.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 54 54 20 21 63 212

21.60 14.71 16.39 19.81 17.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 30 43 11 24 40 148

12.00 11.72 9.02 22.64 11.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 77 17 19 68 223

16.80 20.98 13.93 17.92 19.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 106 351 1196

20.90 30.69 10.20 8.86 29.35===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

518

Page 520: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 37 58 112 47 254

18.69 18.53 24.24 20.80-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 63 90 138 68 359

31.82 28.75 29.87 30.09-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 34 53 76 50 213

17.17 16.93 16.45 22.12-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 9 43 72 25 149

4.55 13.74 15.58 11.06-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 55 69 64 36 224

27.78 22.04 13.85 15.93-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 462 226 1199

16.51 26.11 38.53 18.85=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

519

Page 521: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36C. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing the Pay of Public School Teachers

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 39 55 43 158 30 40 54 419

61.90 52.88 44.79 44.38 24.19 17.32 24.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 15 35 38 102 38 90 65 383

23.81 33.65 39.58 28.65 30.65 38.96 29.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

520

Page 522: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 0 5 9 27 31 56 36 1640.00 4.81 9.38 7.58 25.00 24.24 16.59

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 2 2 2 16 15 34 42 113

3.17 1.92 2.08 4.49 12.10 14.72 19.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 7 4 53 10 11 20 112

11.11 6.73 4.17 14.89 8.06 4.76 9.22----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 96 356 124 231 217 1191

5.29 8.73 8.06 29.89 10.41 19.40 18.22==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 137 158 124 419

52.29 44.38 21.60--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 88 102 194 384

33.59 28.65 33.80--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 13 27 124 164

4.96 7.58 21.60--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 16 92 114

2.29 4.49 16.03--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 18 53 40 111

6.87 14.89 6.97

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

521

Page 523: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 356 574 1192

21.98 29.87 48.15====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 141 55 55 39 17 30 67 404

55.29 48.67 46.61 35.78 14.05 24.19 22.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 70 34 41 37 38 47 103 370

27.45 30.09 34.75 33.94 31.40 37.90 34.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 10 7 9 12 38 23 60 159

3.92 6.19 7.63 11.01 31.40 18.55 20.20-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 4 5 13 25 12 45 112

3.14 3.54 4.24 11.93 20.66 9.68 15.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 26 13 8 8 3 12 22 92

10.20 11.50 6.78 7.34 2.48 9.68 7.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 109 121 124 297 1137

22.43 9.94 10.38 9.59 10.64 10.91 26.12===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

522

Page 524: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 252 39 114 405

51.64 35.78 20.99----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 145 37 188 370

29.71 33.94 34.62----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 26 12 121 159

5.33 11.01 22.28----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 18 13 82 113

3.69 11.93 15.10----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 8 38 93

9.63 7.34 7.00----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 109 543 1140

42.81 9.56 47.63======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 72 243 43 62 420

30.00 53.52 16.35 26.05

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

523

Page 525: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 87 138 87 72 384

36.25 30.40 33.08 30.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 40 23 62 40 165

16.67 5.07 23.57 16.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 24 16 59 15 114

10.00 3.52 22.43 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 34 12 49 112

7.08 7.49 4.56 20.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 454 263 238 1195

20.08 37.99 22.01 19.92==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 11 128 129 36 77 41 422

26.83 36.57 38.86 31.58 31.30 35.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 11 111 86 45 91 40 384

26.83 31.71 25.90 39.47 36.99 35.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 6 36 56 15 32 21 166

14.63 10.29 16.87 13.16 13.01 18.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 34 21 14 29 10 114

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

524

Page 526: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

14.63 9.71 6.33 12.28 11.79 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 41 40 4 17 2 111

17.07 11.71 12.05 3.51 6.91 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 350 332 114 246 114 1197

3.43 29.24 27.74 9.52 20.55 9.52=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 77 77 47 96 119 416

41.85 28.95 35.61 33.92 36.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 55 103 39 96 90 383

29.89 38.72 29.55 33.92 27.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 25 46 22 37 36 166

13.59 17.29 16.67 13.07 11.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 18 17 13 31 36 115

9.78 6.39 9.85 10.95 11.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 23 11 23 46 112

4.89 8.65 8.33 8.13 14.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 266 132 283 327 1192

15.44 22.32 11.07 23.74 27.43========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

525

Page 527: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 223 72 104 8 0 9 4 420

31.06 46.15 38.66 36.36 0.00 75.00 28.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 240 39 90 8 2 1 3 383

33.43 25.00 33.46 36.36 66.67 8.33 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 125 10 24 4 1 0 2 166

17.41 6.41 8.92 18.18 33.33 0.00 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 68 9 29 0 0 2 5 113

9.47 5.77 10.78 0.00 0.00 16.67 35.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 26 22 2 0 0 0 112

8.64 16.67 8.18 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 156 269 22 3 12 14 1194

60.13 13.07 22.53 1.84 0.25 1.01 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

526

Page 528: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 221 7 49 22 96 24 419

34.32 30.43 32.45 33.85 37.80 42.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 214 7 62 17 65 19 384

33.23 30.43 41.06 26.15 25.59 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 97 2 19 12 33 2 165

15.06 8.70 12.58 18.46 12.99 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 66 0 4 7 30 7 114

10.25 0.00 2.65 10.77 11.81 12.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 46 7 17 7 30 5 112

7.14 30.43 11.26 10.77 11.81 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 151 65 254 57 1194

53.94 1.93 12.65 5.44 21.27 4.77========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 179 241 420

32.08 37.77----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 172 212 384

30.82 33.23----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

527

Page 529: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 90 76 16616.13 11.91

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 69 45 114

12.37 7.05----------------------------------------------Don't know 48 64 112

8.60 10.03----------------------------------------------Total 558 638 1196

46.66 53.34==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 138 202 80 420

38.66 34.41 32.26--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 109 192 78 379

30.53 32.71 31.45--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 41 81 44 166

11.48 13.80 17.74--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 33 57 25 115

9.24 9.71 10.08--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 55 21 112

10.08 9.37 8.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

528

Page 530: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 357 587 248 1192

29.95 49.24 20.81========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 71 138 38 52 120 419

28.51 37.60 31.40 50.00 34.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 99 111 30 27 116 383

39.76 30.25 24.79 25.96 32.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 35 52 18 11 50 166

14.06 14.17 14.88 10.58 14.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 24 33 23 5 28 113

9.64 8.99 19.01 4.81 7.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 33 12 9 38 112

8.03 8.99 9.92 8.65 10.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 367 121 104 352 1193

20.87 30.76 10.14 8.72 29.51===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

529

Page 531: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 84 133 125 78 420

42.42 42.36 27.35 34.36-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 59 77 175 72 383

29.80 24.52 38.29 31.72-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 23 35 69 40 167

11.62 11.15 15.10 17.62-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 7 34 50 23 114

3.54 10.83 10.94 10.13-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 35 38 14 112

12.63 11.15 8.32 6.17-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 457 227 1196

16.56 26.25 38.21 18.98=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

530

Page 532: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36D. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing Funding for the Public School System

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 42 67 56 149 34 34 42 424

67.74 64.42 58.33 41.85 27.20 14.72 19.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 9 27 21 99 35 58 44 293

14.52 25.96 21.88 27.81 28.00 25.11 20.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

531

Page 533: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 2 2 13 36 27 78 42 2003.23 1.92 13.54 10.11 21.60 33.77 19.72

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 1 1 2 26 19 55 58 162

1.61 0.96 2.08 7.30 15.20 23.81 27.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 7 4 46 10 6 27 108

12.90 6.73 4.17 12.92 8.00 2.60 12.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 356 125 231 213 1187

5.22 8.76 8.09 29.99 10.53 19.46 17.94==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 165 149 110 424

63.22 41.85 19.33--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 56 99 137 292

21.46 27.81 24.08--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 17 36 147 200

6.51 10.11 25.83--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 4 26 132 162

1.53 7.30 23.20--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 46 43 108

7.28 12.92 7.56

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

532

Page 534: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 356 569 1186

22.01 30.02 47.98====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 142 70 70 36 8 34 50 410

55.47 61.95 59.32 32.14 6.61 27.64 17.06-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 68 21 28 32 31 27 74 281

26.56 18.58 23.73 28.57 25.62 21.95 25.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 10 7 12 18 43 25 80 195

3.91 6.19 10.17 16.07 35.54 20.33 27.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 2 2 20 37 29 58 156

3.12 1.77 1.69 17.86 30.58 23.58 19.80-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 13 6 6 2 8 31 94

10.94 11.50 5.08 5.36 1.65 6.50 10.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 118 112 121 123 293 1136

22.54 9.95 10.39 9.86 10.65 10.83 25.79===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

533

Page 535: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 282 36 92 410

57.67 32.14 17.10----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 117 32 133 282

23.93 28.57 24.72----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 30 18 148 196

6.13 16.07 27.51----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 20 125 157

2.45 17.86 23.23----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 6 40 94

9.82 5.36 7.43----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 538 1139

42.93 9.83 47.23======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 68 272 19 65 424

28.81 60.18 7.22 27.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

534

Page 536: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 70 109 56 57 292

29.66 24.12 21.29 23.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 54 29 77 40 200

22.88 6.42 29.28 16.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 24 9 99 32 164

10.17 1.99 37.64 13.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 33 12 44 109

8.47 7.30 4.56 18.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 236 452 263 238 1189

19.85 38.02 22.12 20.02==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 9 135 114 49 84 33 424

23.08 38.57 34.76 43.36 34.15 29.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 9 86 88 27 53 30 293

23.08 24.57 26.83 23.89 21.54 26.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 8 54 56 11 43 28 200

20.51 15.43 17.07 9.73 17.48 24.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 36 35 19 47 20 163

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

535

Page 537: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.38 10.29 10.67 16.81 19.11 17.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 39 35 7 19 2 109

17.95 11.14 10.67 6.19 7.72 1.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 39 350 328 113 246 113 1189

3.28 29.44 27.59 9.50 20.69 9.50=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 56 67 43 124 133 423

29.95 25.38 32.82 44.93 40.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 52 79 34 69 58 292

27.81 29.92 25.95 25.00 17.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 38 61 28 33 39 199

20.32 23.11 21.37 11.96 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 26 35 15 33 52 161

13.90 13.26 11.45 11.96 15.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 22 11 17 45 110

8.02 8.33 8.40 6.16 13.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 131 276 327 1185

15.78 22.28 11.05 23.29 27.59========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

536

Page 538: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 211 69 128 6 0 7 3 424

29.51 44.52 47.76 27.27 0.00 63.64 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 179 41 59 9 1 1 2 292

25.03 26.45 22.01 40.91 33.33 9.09 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 151 9 35 5 0 0 0 200

21.12 5.81 13.06 22.73 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 115 8 27 0 2 2 9 163

16.08 5.16 10.07 0.00 66.67 18.18 64.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 28 19 2 0 1 0 109

8.25 18.06 7.09 9.09 0.00 9.09 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 155 268 22 3 11 14 1188

60.19 13.05 22.56 1.85 0.25 0.93 1.18=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

537

Page 539: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 217 8 53 14 109 23 424

33.70 34.78 34.87 22.22 43.43 40.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 153 7 46 17 52 19 294

23.76 30.43 30.26 26.98 20.72 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 117 1 30 15 34 3 200

18.17 4.35 19.74 23.81 13.55 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 106 0 6 11 32 8 163

16.46 0.00 3.95 17.46 12.75 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 7 17 6 24 4 109

7.92 30.43 11.18 9.52 9.56 7.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 152 63 251 57 1190

54.12 1.93 12.77 5.29 21.09 4.79========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 183 241 424

32.74 38.25----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 124 169 293

22.18 26.83----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

538

Page 540: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 110 90 20019.68 14.29

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 94 69 163

16.82 10.95----------------------------------------------Don't know 48 61 109

8.59 9.68----------------------------------------------Total 559 630 1189

47.01 52.99==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 162 186 76 424

45.38 31.96 30.89--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 85 143 61 289

23.81 24.57 24.80--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 40 105 54 199

11.20 18.04 21.95--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 36 91 37 164

10.08 15.64 15.04--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 57 18 109

9.52 9.79 7.32

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

539

Page 541: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 357 582 246 1185

30.13 49.11 20.76========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 86 139 35 50 114 424

34.26 38.29 28.93 46.73 32.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 61 84 30 24 94 293

24.30 23.14 24.79 22.43 27.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 44 60 23 12 61 200

17.53 16.53 19.01 11.21 17.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 36 47 22 12 46 163

14.34 12.95 18.18 11.21 13.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 33 11 9 31 108

9.56 9.09 9.09 8.41 8.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 363 121 107 346 1188

21.13 30.56 10.19 9.01 29.12===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

540

Page 542: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 83 138 140 63 424

42.13 44.23 30.84 27.75-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 55 63 108 67 293

27.92 20.19 23.79 29.52-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 25 40 85 50 200

12.69 12.82 18.72 22.03-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 38 82 31 163

6.09 12.18 18.06 13.66-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 33 39 16 110

11.17 10.58 8.59 7.05-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 454 227 1190

16.55 26.22 38.15 19.08=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

541

Page 543: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36E. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 32 41 41 128 35 54 50 381

51.61 39.42 42.71 35.75 28.00 23.28 22.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 20 50 37 104 53 102 77 443

32.26 48.08 38.54 29.05 42.40 43.97 35.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

542

Page 544: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 0 4 7 56 15 46 45 1730.00 3.85 7.29 15.64 12.00 19.83 20.64

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 2 1 3 13 11 14 20 64

3.23 0.96 3.12 3.63 8.80 6.03 9.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 8 8 57 11 16 26 134

12.90 7.69 8.33 15.92 8.80 6.90 11.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 358 125 232 218 1195

5.19 8.70 8.03 29.96 10.46 19.41 18.24==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 114 128 138 380

43.35 35.75 24.08--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 108 104 231 443

41.06 29.05 40.31--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 11 56 106 173

4.18 15.64 18.50--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 13 45 64

2.28 3.63 7.85--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 57 53 134

9.13 15.92 9.25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

543

Page 545: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 573 1194

22.03 29.98 47.99====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 114 49 53 29 19 34 64 362

44.53 42.98 45.30 25.66 15.70 27.42 21.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 86 37 42 40 55 48 127 435

33.59 32.46 35.90 35.40 45.45 38.71 42.47-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 17 9 12 19 30 25 59 171

6.64 7.89 10.26 16.81 24.79 20.16 19.73-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 5 7 11 10 3 19 63

3.12 4.39 5.98 9.73 8.26 2.42 6.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 31 14 3 14 7 14 30 113

12.11 12.28 2.56 12.39 5.79 11.29 10.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 117 113 121 124 299 1144

22.38 9.97 10.23 9.88 10.58 10.84 26.14===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

544

Page 546: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 216 29 117 362

44.35 25.66 21.59----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 164 40 230 434

33.68 35.40 42.44----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 38 19 113 170

7.80 16.81 20.85----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 21 11 31 63

4.31 9.73 5.72----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 14 51 113

9.86 12.39 9.41----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 113 542 1142

42.64 9.89 47.46======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 62 209 56 53 380

25.62 46.24 21.13 22.27

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

545

Page 547: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 103 154 104 82 443

42.56 34.07 39.25 34.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 41 36 57 41 175

16.94 7.96 21.51 17.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 19 29 5 65

4.96 4.20 10.94 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 34 19 57 134

9.92 7.52 7.17 23.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 452 265 238 1197

20.22 37.76 22.14 19.88==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 11 99 121 34 82 33 380

27.50 28.05 36.56 30.09 33.20 29.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 7 127 113 51 96 50 444

17.50 35.98 34.14 45.13 38.87 44.25---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 8 62 46 12 30 17 175

20.00 17.56 13.90 10.62 12.15 15.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 15 13 7 14 9 64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

546

Page 548: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.00 4.25 3.93 6.19 5.67 7.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 50 38 9 25 4 134

20.00 14.16 11.48 7.96 10.12 3.54---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 353 331 113 247 113 1197

3.34 29.49 27.65 9.44 20.63 9.44=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 85 76 35 94 87 377

45.21 28.68 26.52 33.45 26.61------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 53 110 57 88 135 443

28.19 41.51 43.18 31.32 41.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 24 42 19 54 35 174

12.77 15.85 14.39 19.22 10.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 10 8 19 20 65

4.26 3.77 6.06 6.76 6.12------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 18 27 13 26 50 134

9.57 10.19 9.85 9.25 15.29------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 281 327 1193

15.76 22.21 11.06 23.55 27.41========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

547

Page 549: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 200 69 99 4 1 6 1 380

27.93 44.23 36.40 18.18 33.33 50.00 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 291 44 94 4 1 2 8 444

40.64 28.21 34.56 18.18 33.33 16.67 57.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 119 6 35 10 0 2 2 174

16.62 3.85 12.87 45.45 0.00 16.67 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 31 10 18 1 0 2 1 63

4.33 6.41 6.62 4.55 0.00 16.67 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 75 27 26 3 1 0 2 134

10.47 17.31 9.56 13.64 33.33 0.00 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 272 22 3 12 14 1195

59.92 13.05 22.76 1.84 0.25 1.00 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

548

Page 550: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 209 5 55 17 80 16 382

32.30 20.83 36.18 26.15 31.37 28.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 247 9 62 28 70 29 445

38.18 37.50 40.79 43.08 27.45 50.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 93 3 16 12 46 5 175

14.37 12.50 10.53 18.46 18.04 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 39 0 2 1 20 2 64

6.03 0.00 1.32 1.54 7.84 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 7 17 7 39 5 134

9.12 29.17 11.18 10.77 15.29 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 24 152 65 255 57 1200

53.92 2.00 12.67 5.42 21.25 4.75========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 169 212 381

30.23 33.23----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 215 228 443

38.46 35.74----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

549

Page 551: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 80 95 17514.31 14.89

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 36 28 64

6.44 4.39----------------------------------------------Don't know 59 75 134

10.55 11.76----------------------------------------------Total 559 638 1197

46.70 53.30==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 125 178 74 377

35.11 30.22 29.72--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 127 230 86 443

35.67 39.05 34.54--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 48 78 50 176

13.48 13.24 20.08--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 17 37 10 64

4.78 6.28 4.02--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 39 66 29 134

10.96 11.21 11.65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

550

Page 552: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 356 589 249 1194

29.82 49.33 20.85========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 79 113 36 45 107 380

31.47 30.79 29.51 42.45 30.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 94 157 38 33 121 443

37.45 42.78 31.15 31.13 34.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 37 36 25 16 61 175

14.74 9.81 20.49 15.09 17.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 26 9 3 14 64

4.78 7.08 7.38 2.83 3.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 35 14 9 49 136

11.55 9.54 11.48 8.49 13.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 106 352 1198

20.95 30.63 10.18 8.85 29.38===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

551

Page 553: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 68 106 148 58 380

34.34 33.97 32.17 25.55-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 58 102 175 109 444

29.29 32.69 38.04 48.02-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 35 43 65 32 175

17.68 13.78 14.13 14.10-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 21 25 10 64

4.04 6.73 5.43 4.41-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 40 47 18 134

14.65 12.82 10.22 7.93-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 460 227 1197

16.54 26.07 38.43 18.96=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

552

Page 554: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36F. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 28 39 33 114 33 64 78 389

45.16 37.86 34.38 31.93 26.83 27.59 36.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 18 34 41 94 39 89 74 389

29.03 33.01 42.71 26.33 31.71 38.36 34.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

553

Page 555: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 6 13 7 54 28 44 21 1739.68 12.62 7.29 15.13 22.76 18.97 9.77

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 2 4 7 37 11 26 18 105

3.23 3.88 7.29 10.36 8.94 11.21 8.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 13 8 58 12 9 24 132

12.90 12.62 8.33 16.25 9.76 3.88 11.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 357 123 232 215 1188

5.22 8.67 8.08 30.05 10.35 19.53 18.10==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 100 114 176 390

38.17 31.93 30.88--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 93 94 202 389

35.50 26.33 35.44--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 27 54 93 174

10.31 15.13 16.32--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 13 37 54 104

4.96 10.36 9.47--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 58 45 132

11.07 16.25 7.89

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

554

Page 556: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 357 570 1189

22.04 30.03 47.94====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 101 40 57 33 26 36 89 382

39.45 35.40 48.31 29.20 21.85 28.80 29.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 78 34 39 33 48 46 105 383

30.47 30.09 33.05 29.20 40.34 36.80 35.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 23 16 9 21 26 24 42 161

8.98 14.16 7.63 18.58 21.85 19.20 14.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 24 6 4 15 10 9 34 102

9.38 5.31 3.39 13.27 8.40 7.20 11.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 30 17 9 11 9 10 28 114

11.72 15.04 7.63 9.73 7.56 8.00 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 118 113 119 125 298 1142

22.42 9.89 10.33 9.89 10.42 10.95 26.09===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

555

Page 557: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 198 33 151 382

40.74 29.20 27.91----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 150 33 199 382

30.86 29.20 36.78----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 48 21 91 160

9.88 18.58 16.82----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 34 15 53 102

7.00 13.27 9.80----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 56 11 47 114

11.52 9.73 8.69----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 541 1140

42.63 9.91 47.46======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 66 184 77 66 393

27.39 40.71 29.17 27.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

556

Page 558: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 85 149 98 57 389

35.27 32.96 37.12 24.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 42 48 47 39 176

17.43 10.62 17.80 16.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 26 32 26 20 104

10.79 7.08 9.85 8.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 39 16 55 132

9.13 8.63 6.06 23.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 264 237 1194

20.18 37.86 22.11 19.85==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 17 113 99 40 83 41 393

41.46 31.92 30.28 35.09 33.74 35.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 6 117 113 39 78 37 390

14.63 33.05 34.56 34.21 31.71 32.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 7 49 40 18 42 19 175

17.07 13.84 12.23 15.79 17.07 16.52---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 3 32 31 6 21 12 105

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

557

Page 559: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.32 9.04 9.48 5.26 8.54 10.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 43 44 11 22 6 134

19.51 12.15 13.46 9.65 8.94 5.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 354 327 114 246 115 1197

3.43 29.57 27.32 9.52 20.55 9.61=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 75 84 39 97 93 388

39.68 31.70 30.23 34.52 28.53------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 62 100 39 86 102 389

32.80 37.74 30.23 30.60 31.29------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 21 36 28 44 46 175

11.11 13.58 21.71 15.66 14.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 16 21 12 28 28 105

8.47 7.92 9.30 9.96 8.59------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 24 11 26 57 133

7.94 9.06 8.53 9.25 17.48------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 129 281 326 1190

15.88 22.27 10.84 23.61 27.39========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

558

Page 560: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 220 62 88 3 2 8 10 393

30.86 40.00 32.35 13.64 50.00 66.67 71.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 253 35 90 4 2 3 1 388

35.48 22.58 33.09 18.18 50.00 25.00 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 95 19 54 3 0 1 2 174

13.32 12.26 19.85 13.64 0.00 8.33 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 71 14 10 9 0 0 0 104

9.96 9.03 3.68 40.91 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 74 25 30 3 0 0 1 133

10.38 16.13 11.03 13.64 0.00 0.00 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 713 155 272 22 4 12 14 1192

59.82 13.00 22.82 1.85 0.34 1.01 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

559

Page 561: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 211 6 47 20 89 20 393

32.66 25.00 31.13 31.25 35.18 35.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 227 6 50 20 76 11 390

35.14 25.00 33.11 31.25 30.04 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 94 5 22 12 34 9 176

14.55 20.83 14.57 18.75 13.44 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 55 0 12 5 23 8 103

8.51 0.00 7.95 7.81 9.09 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 7 20 7 31 9 133

9.13 29.17 13.25 10.94 12.25 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 24 151 64 253 57 1195

54.06 2.01 12.64 5.36 21.17 4.77========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 148 244 392

26.52 38.30----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 211 179 390

37.81 28.10----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

560

Page 562: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 87 88 17515.59 13.81

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 47 58 105

8.42 9.11----------------------------------------------Don't know 65 68 133

11.65 10.68----------------------------------------------Total 558 637 1195

46.69 53.31==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 118 181 94 393

33.24 30.73 37.90--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 107 212 70 389

30.14 35.99 28.23--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 59 81 35 175

16.62 13.75 14.11--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 33 47 25 105

9.30 7.98 10.08--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 38 68 24 130

10.70 11.54 9.68

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

561

Page 563: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 355 589 248 1192

29.78 49.41 20.81========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 73 129 31 32 128 393

29.20 35.25 25.41 29.91 36.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 79 114 38 48 111 390

31.60 31.15 31.15 44.86 31.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 46 52 31 10 36 175

18.40 14.21 25.41 9.35 10.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 29 26 7 5 38 105

11.60 7.10 5.74 4.67 10.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 45 15 12 38 133

9.20 12.30 12.30 11.21 10.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 122 107 351 1196

20.90 30.60 10.20 8.95 29.35===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

562

Page 564: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 59 120 159 54 392

29.95 38.46 34.64 24.11-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 61 90 152 86 389

30.96 28.85 33.12 38.39-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 29 35 69 42 175

14.72 11.22 15.03 18.75-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 20 27 36 20 103

10.15 8.65 7.84 8.93-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 40 43 22 133

14.21 12.82 9.37 9.82-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 459 224 1192

16.53 26.17 38.51 18.79=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

563

Page 565: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36G. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing opportunities for online learning

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 19 21 23 95 30 41 39 268

30.16 20.39 23.96 26.39 24.00 17.67 17.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 13 50 48 126 53 113 84 487

20.63 48.54 50.00 35.00 42.40 48.71 38.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

564

Page 566: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 18 15 14 47 23 47 39 20328.57 14.56 14.58 13.06 18.40 20.26 17.89

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 5 9 4 31 10 14 21 94

7.94 8.74 4.17 8.61 8.00 6.03 9.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 8 7 61 9 17 35 145

12.70 7.77 7.29 16.94 7.20 7.33 16.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 125 232 218 1197

5.26 8.60 8.02 30.08 10.44 19.38 18.21==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 63 95 110 268

24.14 26.39 19.23--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 111 126 249 486

42.53 35.00 43.53--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 47 47 108 202

18.01 13.06 18.88--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 17 31 45 93

6.51 8.61 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 61 60 144

8.81 16.94 10.49

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

565

Page 567: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 572 1193

21.88 30.18 47.95====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 71 27 39 28 24 24 39 252

27.95 23.68 33.05 24.78 20.00 19.35 13.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 101 39 51 33 52 58 142 476

39.76 34.21 43.22 29.20 43.33 46.77 47.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 38 21 9 26 26 22 55 197

14.96 18.42 7.63 23.01 21.67 17.74 18.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 10 12 13 10 9 21 87

4.72 8.77 10.17 11.50 8.33 7.26 7.05-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 17 7 13 8 11 41 129

12.60 14.91 5.93 11.50 6.67 8.87 13.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 118 113 120 124 298 1141

22.26 9.99 10.34 9.90 10.52 10.87 26.12===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

566

Page 568: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 137 28 87 252

28.31 24.78 16.02----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 190 33 253 476

39.26 29.20 46.59----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 67 26 103 196

13.84 23.01 18.97----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 34 13 41 88

7.02 11.50 7.55----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 56 13 59 128

11.57 11.50 10.87----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 113 543 1140

42.46 9.91 47.63======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 48 127 45 48 268

19.92 28.16 16.92 20.25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

567

Page 569: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 104 187 117 79 487

43.15 41.46 43.98 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 44 62 50 48 204

18.26 13.75 18.80 20.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 13 34 35 10 92

5.39 7.54 13.16 4.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 41 19 52 144

13.28 9.09 7.14 21.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 451 266 237 1195

20.17 37.74 22.26 19.83==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 4 85 75 28 56 19 267

10.00 24.15 22.66 25.00 22.76 16.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 18 132 140 47 105 45 487

45.00 37.50 42.30 41.96 42.68 39.82---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 7 69 48 13 43 23 203

17.50 19.60 14.50 11.61 17.48 20.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 3 18 27 13 15 17 93

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

568

Page 570: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.50 5.11 8.16 11.61 6.10 15.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 48 41 11 27 9 144

20.00 13.64 12.39 9.82 10.98 7.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 112 246 113 1194

3.35 29.48 27.72 9.38 20.60 9.46=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 44 46 33 68 73 264

23.66 17.36 25.19 24.29 22.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 75 117 52 121 121 486

40.32 44.15 39.69 43.21 37.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 29 52 23 50 48 202

15.59 19.62 17.56 17.86 14.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 21 7 16 30 93

10.22 7.92 5.34 5.71 9.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 29 16 25 55 144

10.22 10.94 12.21 8.93 16.82------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 131 280 327 1189

15.64 22.29 11.02 23.55 27.50========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

569

Page 571: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 138 53 69 3 0 3 2 268

19.22 34.19 25.46 13.04 0.00 23.08 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 311 49 102 9 2 8 7 488

43.31 31.61 37.64 39.13 50.00 61.54 50.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 132 15 45 7 0 1 4 204

18.38 9.68 16.61 30.43 0.00 7.69 28.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 55 8 26 1 2 1 1 94

7.66 5.16 9.59 4.35 50.00 7.69 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 82 30 29 3 0 0 0 144

11.42 19.35 10.70 13.04 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 271 23 4 13 14 1198

59.93 12.94 22.62 1.92 0.33 1.09 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

570

Page 572: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 141 2 31 13 71 11 269

21.79 8.70 20.53 20.00 27.95 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 260 5 71 30 99 22 487

40.19 21.74 47.02 46.15 38.98 38.60--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 124 6 18 9 37 10 204

19.17 26.09 11.92 13.85 14.57 17.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 54 3 8 4 17 6 92

8.35 13.04 5.30 6.15 6.69 10.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 68 7 23 9 30 8 145

10.51 30.43 15.23 13.85 11.81 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 151 65 254 57 1197

54.05 1.92 12.61 5.43 21.22 4.76========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 112 156 268

20.04 24.49----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 239 248 487

42.75 38.93----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

571

Page 573: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 100 104 20417.89 16.33

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 44 49 93

7.87 7.69----------------------------------------------Don't know 64 80 144

11.45 12.56----------------------------------------------Total 559 637 1196

46.74 53.26==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 104 113 47 264

29.38 19.19 18.95--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 130 250 106 486

36.72 42.44 42.74--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 56 101 47 204

15.82 17.15 18.95--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 23 52 18 93

6.50 8.83 7.26--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 73 30 144

11.58 12.39 12.10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

572

Page 574: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 354 589 248 1191

29.72 49.45 20.82========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 54 84 19 27 84 268

21.51 22.95 15.70 25.23 23.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 101 151 59 42 135 488

40.24 41.26 48.76 39.25 38.46---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 46 49 17 17 74 203

18.33 13.39 14.05 15.89 21.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 21 37 7 8 19 92

8.37 10.11 5.79 7.48 5.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 45 19 13 39 145

11.55 12.30 15.70 12.15 11.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 121 107 351 1196

20.99 30.60 10.12 8.95 29.35===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

573

Page 575: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 52 81 98 37 268

26.40 25.88 21.40 16.30-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 76 103 192 115 486

38.58 32.91 41.92 50.66-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 32 53 74 45 204

16.24 16.93 16.16 19.82-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 32 35 14 93

6.09 10.22 7.64 6.17-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 44 59 16 144

12.69 14.06 12.88 7.05-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 313 458 227 1195

16.49 26.19 38.33 19.00=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

574

Page 576: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36H. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 45 52 39 125 24 28 34 347

72.58 50.49 40.62 34.82 19.35 12.17 15.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 6 24 38 103 39 61 37 308

9.68 23.30 39.58 28.69 31.45 26.52 17.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

575

Page 577: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 3 12 9 31 24 62 35 1764.84 11.65 9.38 8.64 19.35 26.96 16.43

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 0 3 3 37 25 65 72 205

0.00 2.91 3.12 10.31 20.16 28.26 33.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 12 7 63 12 14 35 151

12.90 11.65 7.29 17.55 9.68 6.09 16.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 359 124 230 213 1187

5.22 8.68 8.09 30.24 10.45 19.38 17.94==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 136 125 86 347

51.71 34.82 15.17--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 68 103 137 308

25.86 28.69 24.16--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 25 31 122 178

9.51 8.64 21.52--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 37 162 205

2.28 10.31 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 63 60 151

10.65 17.55 10.58

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

576

Page 578: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 567 1189

22.12 30.19 47.69====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 141 46 54 29 9 22 29 330

55.29 40.71 45.76 25.89 7.50 17.60 9.90-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 51 36 40 30 32 24 84 297

20.00 31.86 33.90 26.79 26.67 19.20 28.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 16 10 6 16 32 27 69 176

6.27 8.85 5.08 14.29 26.67 21.60 23.55-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 13 5 3 22 41 37 80 201

5.10 4.42 2.54 19.64 34.17 29.60 27.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 16 15 15 6 15 31 132

13.33 14.16 12.71 13.39 5.00 12.00 10.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 112 120 125 293 1136

22.45 9.95 10.39 9.86 10.56 11.00 25.79===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

577

Page 579: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 241 29 60 330

49.39 25.89 11.15----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 127 30 140 297

26.02 26.79 26.02----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 33 16 128 177

6.76 14.29 23.79----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 22 22 158 202

4.51 19.64 29.37----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 65 15 52 132

13.32 13.39 9.67----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 538 1138

42.88 9.84 47.28======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 46 236 16 50 348

19.09 52.10 6.11 21.10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

578

Page 580: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 86 117 54 51 308

35.68 25.83 20.61 21.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 43 30 76 30 179

17.84 6.62 29.01 12.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 43 25 100 39 207

17.84 5.52 38.17 16.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 45 16 67 151

9.54 9.93 6.11 28.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 453 262 237 1193

20.20 37.97 21.96 19.87==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 8 110 90 33 75 32 348

20.51 31.34 27.11 29.20 30.61 27.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 12 86 88 31 55 37 309

30.77 24.50 26.51 27.43 22.45 32.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 3 48 62 15 30 22 180

7.69 13.68 18.67 13.27 12.24 19.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 48 50 20 58 22 206

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

579

Page 581: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

20.51 13.68 15.06 17.70 23.67 19.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 59 42 14 27 2 152

20.51 16.81 12.65 12.39 11.02 1.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 39 351 332 113 245 115 1195

3.26 29.37 27.78 9.46 20.50 9.62=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 57 50 36 102 104 349

30.32 19.08 27.69 36.17 31.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 51 70 41 70 74 306

27.13 26.72 31.54 24.82 22.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 25 53 16 30 56 180

13.30 20.23 12.31 10.64 17.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 37 53 22 48 42 202

19.68 20.23 16.92 17.02 12.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 18 36 15 32 50 151

9.57 13.74 11.54 11.35 15.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 262 130 282 326 1188

15.82 22.05 10.94 23.74 27.44========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

580

Page 582: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 172 59 102 9 1 2 3 348

24.12 37.58 37.50 40.91 33.33 14.29 23.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 178 40 69 9 0 9 3 308

24.96 25.48 25.37 40.91 0.00 64.29 23.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 136 9 29 1 1 2 1 179

19.07 5.73 10.66 4.55 33.33 14.29 7.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 148 15 37 0 1 0 5 206

20.76 9.55 13.60 0.00 33.33 0.00 38.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 79 34 35 3 0 1 1 153

11.08 21.66 12.87 13.64 0.00 7.14 7.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 713 157 272 22 3 14 13 1194

59.72 13.15 22.78 1.84 0.25 1.17 1.09=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

581

Page 583: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 170 10 50 16 84 18 348

26.48 43.48 32.89 24.62 33.07 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 159 4 49 16 59 21 308

24.77 17.39 32.24 24.62 23.23 36.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 107 1 16 17 33 5 179

16.67 4.35 10.53 26.15 12.99 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 137 1 20 7 35 6 206

21.34 4.35 13.16 10.77 13.78 10.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 69 7 17 9 43 7 152

10.75 30.43 11.18 13.85 16.93 12.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 23 152 65 254 57 1193

53.81 1.93 12.74 5.45 21.29 4.78========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 135 213 348

24.24 33.65----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 134 173 307

24.06 27.33----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

582

Page 584: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 107 72 17919.21 11.37

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 100 105 205

17.95 16.59----------------------------------------------Don't know 81 70 151

14.54 11.06----------------------------------------------Total 557 633 1190

46.81 53.19==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 118 157 70 345

33.24 26.57 28.69--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 105 150 52 307

29.58 25.38 21.31--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 53 82 45 180

14.93 13.87 18.44--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 32 127 47 206

9.01 21.49 19.26--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 75 30 152

13.24 12.69 12.30

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

583

Page 585: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 355 591 244 1190

29.83 49.66 20.50========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 77 106 30 47 89 349

30.92 28.96 24.59 43.52 25.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 62 109 32 20 85 308

24.90 29.78 26.23 18.52 24.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 36 51 19 11 63 180

14.46 13.93 15.57 10.19 18.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 49 50 32 15 59 205

19.68 13.66 26.23 13.89 16.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 50 9 15 54 153

10.04 13.66 7.38 13.89 15.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 366 122 108 350 1195

20.84 30.63 10.21 9.04 29.29===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

584

Page 586: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 66 110 129 44 349

33.33 35.03 27.98 19.82-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 53 73 104 79 309

26.77 23.25 22.56 35.59-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 30 38 71 40 179

15.15 12.10 15.40 18.02-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 16 55 102 33 206

8.08 17.52 22.13 14.86-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 38 55 26 152

16.67 12.10 11.93 11.71-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 222 1195

16.57 26.28 38.58 18.58=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

585

Page 587: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36I. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 9 16 13 90 32 115 102 377

14.75 15.38 13.40 25.14 25.81 49.57 47.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 16 36 34 112 49 87 61 395

26.23 34.62 35.05 31.28 39.52 37.50 28.11----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

586

Page 588: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 16 26 22 54 22 12 12 16426.23 25.00 22.68 15.08 17.74 5.17 5.53

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 17 21 41 7 8 13 115

13.11 16.35 21.65 11.45 5.65 3.45 5.99----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 9 7 61 14 10 29 142

19.67 8.65 7.22 17.04 11.29 4.31 13.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 97 358 124 232 217 1193

5.11 8.72 8.13 30.01 10.39 19.45 18.19==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 38 90 248 376

14.62 25.14 43.36--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 86 112 197 395

33.08 31.28 34.44--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 63 54 46 163

24.23 15.08 8.04--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 45 41 28 114

17.31 11.45 4.90--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 61 53 142

10.77 17.04 9.27

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

587

Page 589: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 358 572 1190

21.85 30.08 48.07====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 58 24 18 26 44 56 138 364

22.66 21.24 15.52 23.21 36.36 44.80 46.62-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 75 42 32 39 45 41 108 382

29.30 37.17 27.59 34.82 37.19 32.80 36.49-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 44 21 34 20 21 10 10 160

17.19 18.58 29.31 17.86 17.36 8.00 3.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 38 8 21 12 7 6 14 106

14.84 7.08 18.10 10.71 5.79 4.80 4.73-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 18 11 15 4 12 26 127

16.02 15.93 9.48 13.39 3.31 9.60 8.78-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 116 112 121 125 296 1139

22.48 9.92 10.18 9.83 10.62 10.97 25.99===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

588

Page 590: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 100 26 239 365

20.62 23.21 44.01----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 149 39 193 381

30.72 34.82 35.54----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 99 20 41 160

20.41 17.86 7.55----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 67 12 27 106

13.81 10.71 4.97----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 15 43 128

14.43 13.39 7.92----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 112 543 1140

42.54 9.82 47.63======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 76 93 151 58 378

31.54 20.71 56.77 24.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

589

Page 591: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 93 137 85 81 396

38.59 30.51 31.95 34.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 30 95 11 26 162

12.45 21.16 4.14 10.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 71 10 15 115

7.88 15.81 3.76 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 53 9 58 143

9.54 11.80 3.38 24.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 449 266 238 1194

20.18 37.60 22.28 19.93==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 11 110 94 48 75 40 378

26.83 31.25 28.40 43.24 30.36 34.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 15 116 124 24 78 39 396

36.59 32.95 37.46 21.62 31.58 33.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 3 51 40 25 34 11 164

7.32 14.49 12.08 22.52 13.77 9.57---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 4 23 30 6 33 20 116

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

590

Page 592: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

9.76 6.53 9.06 5.41 13.36 17.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 52 43 8 27 5 143

19.51 14.77 12.99 7.21 10.93 4.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 111 247 115 1197

3.43 29.41 27.65 9.27 20.63 9.61=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 83 108 47 67 73 378

44.39 40.60 35.88 23.93 22.46------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 65 92 39 100 98 394

34.76 34.59 29.77 35.71 30.15------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 12 24 18 45 63 162

6.42 9.02 13.74 16.07 19.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 15 13 41 34 111

4.28 5.64 9.92 14.64 10.46------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 27 14 27 57 144

10.16 10.15 10.69 9.64 17.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 280 325 1189

15.73 22.37 11.02 23.55 27.33========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

591

Page 593: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 249 47 68 1 3 3 6 377

34.87 30.13 25.19 4.55 75.00 21.43 42.86-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 241 41 82 15 1 8 8 396

33.75 26.28 30.37 68.18 25.00 57.14 57.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 90 15 54 2 0 2 0 163

12.61 9.62 20.00 9.09 0.00 14.29 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 56 20 36 2 0 0 0 114

7.84 12.82 13.33 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 33 30 2 0 1 0 144

10.92 21.15 11.11 9.09 0.00 7.14 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 156 270 22 4 14 14 1194

59.80 13.07 22.61 1.84 0.34 1.17 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

592

Page 594: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 231 5 30 22 77 12 377

35.87 21.74 19.87 34.38 30.43 20.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 210 5 62 25 78 15 395

32.61 21.74 41.06 39.06 30.83 25.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 70 6 20 8 43 16 163

10.87 26.09 13.25 12.50 17.00 27.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 63 0 18 2 23 8 114

9.78 0.00 11.92 3.12 9.09 13.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 7 21 7 32 7 144

10.87 30.43 13.91 10.94 12.65 12.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 151 64 253 58 1193

53.98 1.93 12.66 5.36 21.21 4.86========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 185 192 377

33.04 30.28----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 177 219 396

31.61 34.54----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

593

Page 595: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 75 88 16313.39 13.88

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 61 53 114

10.89 8.36----------------------------------------------Don't know 62 82 144

11.07 12.93----------------------------------------------Total 560 634 1194

46.90 53.10==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 109 180 88 377

30.62 30.66 35.48--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 108 201 83 392

30.34 34.24 33.47--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 51 76 36 163

14.33 12.95 14.52--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 39 61 15 115

10.96 10.39 6.05--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 49 69 26 144

13.76 11.75 10.48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

594

Page 596: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 356 587 248 1191

29.89 49.29 20.82========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 77 108 43 31 119 378

31.05 29.51 35.25 28.97 33.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 77 123 40 34 121 395

31.05 33.61 32.79 31.78 34.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 33 60 14 19 37 163

13.31 16.39 11.48 17.76 10.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 32 31 12 10 30 115

12.90 8.47 9.84 9.35 8.52---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 44 13 13 45 144

11.69 12.02 10.66 12.15 12.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 366 122 107 352 1195

20.75 30.63 10.21 8.95 29.46===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

595

Page 597: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 49 93 156 81 379

24.75 29.90 34.06 35.53-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 68 101 138 89 396

34.34 32.48 30.13 39.04-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 42 40 62 19 163

21.21 12.86 13.54 8.33-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 15 27 54 18 114

7.58 8.68 11.79 7.89-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 50 48 21 143

12.12 16.08 10.48 9.21-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 311 458 228 1195

16.57 26.03 38.33 19.08=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

596

Page 598: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q37. MOST E↵ective Education Policy Proposal

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher prog 1 1 1 29 22 56 54 164

1.61 0.96 1.06 8.08 17.89 24.35 25.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charte 0 2 1 12 9 29 21 74

0.00 1.92 1.06 3.34 7.32 12.61 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

597

Page 599: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Increasing the pay of public s 5 26 9 51 6 13 21 1318.06 25.00 9.57 14.21 4.88 5.65 9.72

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the pub 28 24 32 88 21 19 26 238

45.16 23.08 34.04 24.51 17.07 8.26 12.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for 6 6 4 22 9 9 2 58

9.68 5.77 4.26 6.13 7.32 3.91 0.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standar 5 30 12 60 13 22 28 170

8.06 28.85 12.77 16.71 10.57 9.57 12.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for o 5 1 8 34 12 17 8 85

8.06 0.96 8.51 9.47 9.76 7.39 3.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre- 12 10 24 40 12 6 4 108

19.35 9.62 25.53 11.14 9.76 2.61 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized contro 0 4 3 23 19 59 52 160

0.00 3.85 3.19 6.41 15.45 25.65 24.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 94 359 123 230 216 1188

5.22 8.75 7.91 30.22 10.35 19.36 18.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 3 29 131 163

1.15 8.08 22.98

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

598

Page 600: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 3 12 60 75

1.15 3.34 10.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 41 51 40 132

15.71 14.21 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 84 88 66 238

32.18 24.51 11.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 16 22 21 59

6.13 6.13 3.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 46 60 63 169

17.62 16.71 11.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 14 34 37 85

5.36 9.47 6.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 47 40 22 109

18.01 11.14 3.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 7 23 130 160

2.68 6.41 22.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 359 570 1190

21.93 30.17 47.90============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

599

Page 601: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 8 3 4 16 39 18 69 157

3.15 2.65 3.48 14.04 31.97 14.52 23.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 4 3 2 8 16 12 28 73

1.57 2.65 1.74 7.02 13.11 9.68 9.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 38 23 14 19 6 11 20 131

14.96 20.35 12.17 16.67 4.92 8.87 6.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 75 29 34 21 7 17 41 224

29.53 25.66 29.57 18.42 5.74 13.71 13.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a 18 9 5 6 6 5 5 54

7.09 7.96 4.35 5.26 4.92 4.03 1.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 43 19 22 10 13 22 32 161

16.93 16.81 19.13 8.77 10.66 17.74 10.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 25 4 2 14 11 11 11 78

9.84 3.54 1.74 12.28 9.02 8.87 3.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 36 13 29 5 2 6 14 105

14.17 11.50 25.22 4.39 1.64 4.84 4.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 7 10 3 15 22 22 75 154

2.76 8.85 2.61 13.16 18.03 17.74 25.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 115 114 122 124 295 1137

22.34 9.94 10.11 10.03 10.73 10.91 25.95============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

600

Page 602: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 16 16 127 159

3.29 14.04 23.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 10 8 56 74

2.05 7.02 10.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 75 19 36 130

15.40 16.67 6.64------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 138 21 65 224

28.34 18.42 11.99------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 33 6 16 55

6.78 5.26 2.95------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 85 10 67 162

17.45 8.77 12.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 32 14 33 79

6.57 12.28 6.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 77 5 22 104

15.81 4.39 4.06------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 21 15 120 156

4.31 13.16 22.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 114 542 1143

42.61 9.97 47.42==============================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

601

Page 603: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 32 13 84 35 164

13.28 2.88 31.82 14.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 18 5 38 12 73

7.47 1.11 14.39 5.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 24 64 14 29 131

9.96 14.19 5.30 12.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 43 139 19 37 238

17.84 30.82 7.20 15.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choos 9 33 7 10 59

3.73 7.32 2.65 4.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students 28 80 23 38 169

11.62 17.74 8.71 16.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 26 27 5 27 85

10.79 5.99 1.89 11.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 20 75 2 13 110

8.30 16.63 0.76 5.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum an 41 15 72 34 162

17.01 3.33 27.27 14.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

602

Page 604: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 451 264 235 1191

20.24 37.87 22.17 19.73============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 8 44 34 15 40 22 163

20.00 12.54 10.27 13.39 16.53 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 4 25 20 8 14 2 73

10.00 7.12 6.04 7.14 5.79 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 3 41 49 13 18 6 130

7.50 11.68 14.80 11.61 7.44 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 8 77 69 20 37 27 238

20.00 21.94 20.85 17.86 15.29 23.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose tea 2 17 13 6 16 5 59

5.00 4.84 3.93 5.36 6.61 4.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must 3 55 49 15 29 19 170

7.50 15.67 14.80 13.39 11.98 16.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 2 30 30 9 14 1 86

5.00 8.55 9.06 8.04 5.79 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 7 27 23 12 27 13 109

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

603

Page 605: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

17.50 7.69 6.95 10.71 11.16 11.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and sta 3 35 44 14 47 19 162

7.50 9.97 13.29 12.50 19.42 16.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 331 112 242 114 1190

3.36 29.50 27.82 9.41 20.34 9.58============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 37 40 18 26 40 161

19.79 15.15 13.85 9.29 12.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 9 27 7 13 17 73

4.81 10.23 5.38 4.64 5.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teac 25 23 7 28 49 132

13.37 8.71 5.38 10.00 15.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school 23 46 26 65 78 238

12.30 17.42 20.00 23.21 23.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individual 9 8 11 13 18 59

4.81 3.03 8.46 4.64 5.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized test 19 36 25 48 41 169

10.16 13.64 19.23 17.14 12.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

604

Page 606: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Increasing opportunities for online lear 16 23 4 20 23 868.56 8.71 3.08 7.14 7.06

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergart 12 18 15 39 25 109

6.42 6.82 11.54 13.93 7.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over cur 37 43 17 28 35 160

19.79 16.29 13.08 10.00 10.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 130 280 326 1187

15.75 22.24 10.95 23.59 27.46============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 112 11 29 3 2 0 8 165

15.69 7.05 10.70 14.29 50.00 0.00 57.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter sc 49 2 17 2 1 2 0 73

6.86 1.28 6.27 9.52 25.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public schoo 63 26 40 0 0 1 1 131

8.82 16.67 14.76 0.00 0.00 7.14 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public 135 30 63 9 0 1 0 238

18.91 19.23 23.25 42.86 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for indi 29 15 14 0 0 1 0 59

4.06 9.62 5.17 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

605

Page 607: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardize 93 22 48 1 1 1 3 169

13.03 14.10 17.71 4.76 25.00 7.14 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for onlin 36 23 23 2 0 2 0 86

5.04 14.74 8.49 9.52 0.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kind 61 17 27 2 0 3 0 110

8.54 10.90 9.96 9.52 0.00 21.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control ov 136 10 10 2 0 3 2 163

19.05 6.41 3.69 9.52 0.00 21.43 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 156 271 21 4 14 14 1194

59.80 13.07 22.70 1.76 0.34 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 113 0 11 7 27 7 165

17.55 0.00 7.24 10.77 10.76 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 45 3 8 5 14 0 75

6.99 12.50 5.26 7.69 5.58 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 70 2 19 10 19 10 130

10.87 8.33 12.50 15.38 7.57 17.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 101 11 33 12 67 15 239

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

606

Page 608: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.68 45.83 21.71 18.46 26.69 26.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teac 28 0 9 4 11 6 58

4.35 0.00 5.92 6.15 4.38 10.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must 86 4 31 4 38 7 170

13.35 16.67 20.39 6.15 15.14 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 34 0 7 5 32 7 85

5.28 0.00 4.61 7.69 12.75 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 55 1 20 5 26 2 109

8.54 4.17 13.16 7.69 10.36 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and stan 112 3 14 13 17 2 161

17.39 12.50 9.21 20.00 6.77 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 24 152 65 251 56 1192

54.03 2.01 12.75 5.45 21.06 4.70============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 98 66 164

17.59 10.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 37 37 74

6.64 5.82------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

607

Page 609: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Increasing the pay of public school teachers 55 77 1329.87 12.11

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 112 126 238

20.11 19.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 28 31 59

5.03 4.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 49 120 169

8.80 18.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 40 45 85

7.18 7.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 57 53 110

10.23 8.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 81 81 162

14.54 12.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 557 636 1193

46.69 53.31======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 38 91 35 164

10.64 15.56 14.17

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

608

Page 610: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 21 37 16 74

5.88 6.32 6.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 44 64 24 132

12.32 10.94 9.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 90 112 35 237

25.21 19.15 14.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 19 33 8 60

5.32 5.64 3.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 49 76 44 169

13.73 12.99 17.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 21 44 17 82

5.88 7.52 6.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 35 50 24 109

9.80 8.55 9.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 40 78 44 162

11.20 13.33 17.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 585 247 1189

30.03 49.20 20.77================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

609

Page 611: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 34 51 28 11 40 164

13.82 13.90 23.14 10.19 11.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schoo 14 24 8 7 20 73

5.69 6.54 6.61 6.48 5.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school t 16 45 15 15 41 132

6.50 12.26 12.40 13.89 11.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public sch 60 71 15 26 65 237

24.39 19.35 12.40 24.07 18.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individ 12 24 9 5 10 60

4.88 6.54 7.44 4.63 2.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized t 32 49 13 14 62 170

13.01 13.35 10.74 12.96 17.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online l 15 23 9 9 29 85

6.10 6.27 7.44 8.33 8.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kinderg 28 34 12 15 19 108

11.38 9.26 9.92 13.89 5.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over 35 46 12 6 63 162

14.23 12.53 9.92 5.56 18.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 246 367 121 108 349 1191

20.65 30.81 10.16 9.07 29.30============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

610

Page 612: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 12 44 75 34 165

6.09 14.15 16.27 15.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 6 20 32 16 74

3.05 6.43 6.94 7.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 21 34 43 34 132

10.66 10.93 9.33 15.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 60 78 69 32 239

30.46 25.08 14.97 14.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 5 11 30 14 60

2.54 3.54 6.51 6.19---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 30 50 71 18 169

15.23 16.08 15.40 7.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 28 24 24 9 85

14.21 7.72 5.21 3.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 22 21 48 19 110

11.17 6.75 10.41 8.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 13 29 69 50 161

6.60 9.32 14.97 22.12---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 311 461 226 1195

16.49 26.03 38.58 18.91=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

611

Page 613: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q38. Perceived Existence of Gender Gap in Pay

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 51 91 68 226 65 106 93 700

80.95 88.35 70.83 62.78 52.00 45.49 42.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 0 0 1 8 4 6 6 25

0.00 0.00 1.04 2.22 3.20 2.58 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

612

Page 614: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Both earn about the same amoun 6 10 22 102 47 115 104 4069.52 9.71 22.92 28.33 37.60 49.36 47.93

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 2 5 24 9 6 14 66

9.52 1.94 5.21 6.67 7.20 2.58 6.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 125 233 217 1197

5.26 8.60 8.02 30.08 10.44 19.47 18.13============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 210 226 264 700

79.85 62.78 46.07-------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 1 8 15 24

0.38 2.22 2.62-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 39 102 266 407

14.83 28.33 46.42-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 24 28 65

4.94 6.67 4.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 573 1196

21.99 30.10 47.91===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

613

Page 615: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 202 76 92 57 54 64 139 684

78.91 66.67 76.03 50.44 44.26 51.61 46.64----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 4 2 5 2 0 1 11 25

1.56 1.75 4.13 1.77 0.00 0.81 3.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 38 31 18 44 65 55 134 385

14.84 27.19 14.88 38.94 53.28 44.35 44.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 5 6 10 3 4 14 54

4.69 4.39 4.96 8.85 2.46 3.23 4.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 121 113 122 124 298 1148

22.30 9.93 10.54 9.84 10.63 10.80 25.96==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 370 57 256 683

75.66 50.44 47.15---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

614

Page 616: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The woman generally earns more 10 2 12 242.04 1.77 2.21

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 86 44 254 384

17.59 38.94 46.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 10 21 54

4.70 8.85 3.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 113 543 1145

42.71 9.87 47.42=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 133 349 95 124 701

55.19 76.70 35.71 52.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 9 7 8 1 25

3.73 1.54 3.01 0.42-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 90 80 153 86 409

37.34 17.58 57.52 36.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 19 10 27 65

3.73 4.18 3.76 11.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 266 238 1200

20.08 37.92 22.17 19.83

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

615

Page 617: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 18 194 195 65 159 72 703

43.90 54.96 58.73 57.52 64.37 62.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 2 10 8 1 1 2 24

4.88 2.83 2.41 0.88 0.40 1.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 16 131 111 43 70 38 409

39.02 37.11 33.43 38.05 28.34 33.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 18 18 4 17 3 65

12.20 5.10 5.42 3.54 6.88 2.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 113 247 115 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.41 20.57 9.58====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

616

Page 618: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The man generally earns more 104 139 77 164 218 70255.61 52.45 58.33 58.16 66.26

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 3 13 2 2 3 23

1.60 4.91 1.52 0.71 0.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 69 101 49 101 88 408

36.90 38.11 37.12 35.82 26.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 12 4 15 20 62

5.88 4.53 3.03 5.32 6.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 132 282 329 1195

15.65 22.18 11.05 23.60 27.53===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 421 98 162 7 0 9 4 701

58.64 63.23 59.56 33.33 0.00 69.23 30.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 11 3 7 2 0 0 1 24

1.53 1.94 2.57 9.52 0.00 0.00 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 254 39 88 11 4 4 7 407

35.38 25.16 32.35 52.38 100.00 30.77 53.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 15 15 1 0 0 1 64

4.46 9.68 5.51 4.76 0.00 0.00 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

617

Page 619: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 272 21 4 13 13 1196

60.03 12.96 22.74 1.76 0.33 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 362 13 96 50 141 41 703

55.86 54.17 63.58 76.92 55.51 71.93-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 12 4 2 0 7 0 25

1.85 16.67 1.32 0.00 2.76 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 239 6 42 15 92 14 408

36.88 25.00 27.81 23.08 36.22 24.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 35 1 11 0 14 2 63

5.40 4.17 7.28 0.00 5.51 3.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 151 65 254 57 1199

54.05 2.00 12.59 5.42 21.18 4.75===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

618

Page 620: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total---------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 263 439 702

46.80 68.70---------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 14 11 25

2.49 1.72---------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 247 162 409

43.95 25.35---------------------------------------------------------Don't know 38 27 65

6.76 4.23---------------------------------------------------------Total 562 639 1201

46.79 53.21=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 228 346 127 701

63.87 58.54 51.21-------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 7 9 8 24

1.96 1.52 3.23-------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 106 200 103 409

29.69 33.84 41.53

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

619

Page 621: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 36 10 62

4.48 6.09 4.03-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 248 1196

29.85 49.41 20.74===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 159 228 72 78 165 702

63.60 61.79 59.50 72.90 46.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 8 5 1 1 9 24

3.20 1.36 0.83 0.93 2.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 71 117 42 25 153 408

28.40 31.71 34.71 23.36 43.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 19 6 3 25 65

4.80 5.15 4.96 2.80 7.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 369 121 107 352 1199

20.85 30.78 10.09 8.92 29.36======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

620

Page 622: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 89 186 281 146 702

44.95 59.24 60.82 64.32------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 10 8 6 1 25

5.05 2.55 1.30 0.44------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 79 102 155 72 408

39.90 32.48 33.55 31.72------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 18 20 8 66

10.10 5.73 4.33 3.52------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 462 227 1201

16.49 26.14 38.47 18.90========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

621

Page 623: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q39. State’s Role in Addressing Gender Equality in the Workplace

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 55 97 79 213 43 55 46 588

87.30 94.17 81.44 59.17 34.68 23.71 21.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 1 4 12 91 53 140 102 403

1.59 3.88 12.37 25.28 42.74 60.34 46.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

622

Page 624: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State is doing too much 0 0 0 12 12 15 42 810.00 0.00 0.00 3.33 9.68 6.47 19.27

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 2 6 44 16 22 28 125

11.11 1.94 6.19 12.22 12.90 9.48 12.84-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 360 124 232 218 1197

5.26 8.60 8.10 30.08 10.36 19.38 18.21=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 231 213 144 588

88.17 59.17 25.13-----------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 16 91 294 401

6.11 25.28 51.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 0 12 69 81

0.00 3.33 12.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 44 66 125

5.73 12.22 11.52-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 573 1195

21.92 30.13 47.95=======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

623

Page 625: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 208 77 97 56 22 40 63 563

81.57 67.54 80.83 50.00 18.33 32.00 21.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 23 22 16 30 72 61 167 391

9.02 19.30 13.33 26.79 60.00 48.80 56.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 0 2 2 15 17 8 34 78

0.00 1.75 1.67 13.39 14.17 6.40 11.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 13 5 11 9 16 34 112

9.41 11.40 4.17 9.82 7.50 12.80 11.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 120 112 120 125 298 1144

22.29 9.97 10.49 9.79 10.49 10.93 26.05==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 383 56 125 564

78.48 50.00 22.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

624

Page 626: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State is doing enough 60 30 300 39012.30 26.79 55.15

-------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 3 15 59 77

0.61 13.39 10.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 11 60 113

8.61 9.82 11.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 544 1144

42.66 9.79 47.55=========================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 96 378 25 89 588

40.00 83.26 9.40 37.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 109 48 168 78 403

45.42 10.57 63.16 32.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 13 3 54 11 81

5.42 0.66 20.30 4.62-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 25 19 60 126

9.17 5.51 7.14 25.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 454 266 238 1198

20.03 37.90 22.20 19.87

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

625

Page 627: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 16 182 157 63 111 59 588

38.10 51.70 47.43 55.75 45.12 51.75------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 20 115 113 28 83 44 403

47.62 32.67 34.14 24.78 33.74 38.60------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 1 16 21 8 28 8 82

2.38 4.55 6.34 7.08 11.38 7.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 39 40 14 24 3 125

11.90 11.08 12.08 12.39 9.76 2.63------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 352 331 113 246 114 1198

3.51 29.38 27.63 9.43 20.53 9.52============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

626

Page 628: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State should do more 82 107 55 155 189 58843.62 40.23 41.98 54.96 57.62

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 73 103 52 86 88 402

38.83 38.72 39.69 30.50 26.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 16 23 10 17 13 79

8.51 8.65 7.63 6.03 3.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 33 14 24 38 126

9.04 12.41 10.69 8.51 11.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 131 282 328 1195

15.73 22.26 10.96 23.60 27.45===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 299 116 155 9 2 5 3 589

41.59 74.84 57.20 39.13 50.00 38.46 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 280 15 82 11 2 7 6 403

38.94 9.68 30.26 47.83 50.00 53.85 42.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 59 2 15 1 0 1 4 82

8.21 1.29 5.54 4.35 0.00 7.69 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 81 22 19 2 0 0 1 125

11.27 14.19 7.01 8.70 0.00 0.00 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

627

Page 629: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 155 271 23 4 13 14 1199

59.97 12.93 22.60 1.92 0.33 1.08 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 276 15 100 28 135 35 589

42.59 62.50 66.23 43.08 53.15 60.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 235 5 30 30 85 18 403

36.27 20.83 19.87 46.15 33.46 31.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 61 1 6 3 9 2 82

9.41 4.17 3.97 4.62 3.54 3.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 76 3 15 4 25 3 126

11.73 12.50 9.93 6.15 9.84 5.17-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 151 65 254 58 1200

54.00 2.00 12.58 5.42 21.17 4.83===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

628

Page 630: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------State should do more 231 358 589

41.10 56.11-------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 226 177 403

40.21 27.74-------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 57 25 82

10.14 3.92-------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 78 126

8.54 12.23-------------------------------------------------Total 562 638 1200

46.83 53.17=================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------State should do more 216 271 102 589

60.34 45.93 40.96-----------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 96 202 105 403

26.82 34.24 42.17-----------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 8 59 15 82

2.23 10.00 6.02

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

629

Page 631: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 38 58 27 123

10.61 9.83 10.84-----------------------------------------------------------Total 358 590 249 1197

29.91 49.29 20.80===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 123 197 50 70 149 589

49.00 53.53 40.65 65.42 42.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 88 113 51 15 136 403

35.06 30.71 41.46 14.02 38.75------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 17 19 5 15 26 82

6.77 5.16 4.07 14.02 7.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 39 17 7 40 126

9.16 10.60 13.82 6.54 11.40------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 123 107 351 1200

20.92 30.67 10.25 8.92 29.25==============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

630

Page 632: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 99 156 227 108 590

50.00 49.68 49.24 47.58----------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 64 94 156 89 403

32.32 29.94 33.84 39.21----------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 11 25 34 11 81

5.56 7.96 7.38 4.85----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 39 44 19 126

12.12 12.42 9.54 8.37----------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 227 1200

16.50 26.17 38.42 18.92================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

631

Page 633: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q40. Death Penalty Support

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 19 15 16 163 62 135 165 575

30.16 14.85 16.67 45.15 49.60 58.70 75.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 5 22 31 93 37 54 28 270

7.94 21.78 32.29 25.76 29.60 23.48 12.84------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

632

Page 634: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat oppose 13 17 30 47 10 28 5 15020.63 16.83 31.25 13.02 8.00 12.17 2.29

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 19 45 17 31 13 6 10 141

30.16 44.55 17.71 8.59 10.40 2.61 4.59------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 2 2 27 3 7 10 58

11.11 1.98 2.08 7.48 2.40 3.04 4.59------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 101 96 361 125 230 218 1194

5.28 8.46 8.04 30.23 10.47 19.26 18.26==============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 50 163 362 575

19.16 45.15 63.18----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 59 93 119 271

22.61 25.76 20.77----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 60 47 43 150

22.99 13.02 7.50----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 81 31 29 141

31.03 8.59 5.06----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 27 20 58

4.21 7.48 3.49

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

633

Page 635: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 361 573 1195

21.84 30.21 47.95================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 61 42 38 52 77 66 215 551

24.02 36.52 31.93 46.02 63.64 53.23 72.39-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 64 31 21 28 30 33 50 257

25.20 26.96 17.65 24.78 24.79 26.61 16.84-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 45 19 34 10 7 14 18 147

17.72 16.52 28.57 8.85 5.79 11.29 6.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 64 14 25 17 3 6 8 137

25.20 12.17 21.01 15.04 2.48 4.84 2.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 9 1 6 4 5 6 51

7.87 7.83 0.84 5.31 3.31 4.03 2.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 115 119 113 121 124 297 1143

22.22 10.06 10.41 9.89 10.59 10.85 25.98===========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

634

Page 636: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 141 52 358 551

28.95 46.02 66.05------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 117 28 113 258

24.02 24.78 20.85------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 97 10 39 146

19.92 8.85 7.20------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 103 17 17 137

21.15 15.04 3.14------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 6 15 50

5.95 5.31 2.77------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 113 542 1142

42.64 9.89 47.46==================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 134 129 200 114 577

55.60 28.48 74.91 47.90

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

635

Page 637: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 65 110 44 53 272

26.97 24.28 16.48 22.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 25 93 13 20 151

10.37 20.53 4.87 8.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 10 100 5 26 141

4.15 22.08 1.87 10.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 21 5 25 58

2.90 4.64 1.87 10.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 453 267 238 1199

20.10 37.78 22.27 19.85==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 21 184 163 57 114 39 578

51.22 52.27 49.24 50.44 46.15 34.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 6 84 76 22 48 36 272

14.63 23.86 22.96 19.47 19.43 31.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 8 36 38 19 34 15 150

19.51 10.23 11.48 16.81 13.77 13.16-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 2 31 34 10 41 23 141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

636

Page 638: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.88 8.81 10.27 8.85 16.60 20.18-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 17 20 5 10 1 57

9.76 4.83 6.04 4.42 4.05 0.88-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 113 247 114 1198

3.42 29.38 27.63 9.43 20.62 9.52=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 97 138 58 143 139 575

51.60 51.69 44.27 50.71 42.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 37 75 41 67 52 272

19.68 28.09 31.30 23.76 15.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 22 27 16 36 49 150

11.70 10.11 12.21 12.77 14.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 22 15 11 29 64 141

11.70 5.62 8.40 10.28 19.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 12 5 7 24 58

5.32 4.49 3.82 2.48 7.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 267 131 282 328 1196

15.72 22.32 10.95 23.58 27.42====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

637

Page 639: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 370 46 134 10 4 6 7 577

51.46 29.68 49.26 45.45 100.00 46.15 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 156 39 60 11 0 4 3 273

21.70 25.16 22.06 50.00 0.00 30.77 21.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 83 35 29 0 0 3 0 150

11.54 22.58 10.66 0.00 0.00 23.08 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 82 17 39 0 0 0 3 141

11.40 10.97 14.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 18 10 1 0 0 1 58

3.89 11.61 3.68 4.55 0.00 0.00 7.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 155 272 22 4 13 14 1199

59.97 12.93 22.69 1.83 0.33 1.08 1.17=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

638

Page 640: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 353 12 62 33 94 23 577

54.48 52.17 40.79 50.00 37.15 40.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 136 5 38 17 66 10 272

20.99 21.74 25.00 25.76 26.09 17.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 60 4 27 7 45 8 151

9.26 17.39 17.76 10.61 17.79 14.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 65 1 22 5 33 15 141

10.03 4.35 14.47 7.58 13.04 26.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 1 3 4 15 1 58

5.25 4.35 1.97 6.06 5.93 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 152 66 253 57 1199

54.05 1.92 12.68 5.50 21.10 4.75====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------Strongly support 304 273 577

54.09 42.86------------------------------------------Somewhat support 108 164 272

19.22 25.75------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

639

Page 641: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat oppose 75 76 15113.35 11.93

------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 55 86 141

9.79 13.50------------------------------------------Don't know 20 38 58

3.56 5.97------------------------------------------Total 562 637 1199

46.87 53.13==========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------Strongly support 166 270 141 577

46.63 45.84 56.85----------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 67 148 56 271

18.82 25.13 22.58----------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 53 75 22 150

14.89 12.73 8.87----------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 53 65 19 137

14.89 11.04 7.66----------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 31 10 58

4.78 5.26 4.03

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

640

Page 642: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------Total 356 589 248 1193

29.84 49.37 20.79====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 113 163 69 36 196 577

45.02 44.54 56.56 33.64 55.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 57 88 21 32 73 271

22.71 24.04 17.21 29.91 20.80-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 37 52 16 17 29 151

14.74 14.21 13.11 15.89 8.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 31 44 12 20 34 141

12.35 12.02 9.84 18.69 9.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 19 4 2 19 57

5.18 5.19 3.28 1.87 5.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 122 107 351 1197

20.97 30.58 10.19 8.94 29.32=======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

641

Page 643: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 67 135 242 134 578

33.84 42.99 52.61 58.77---------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 57 64 113 37 271

28.79 20.38 24.57 16.23---------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 34 44 45 28 151

17.17 14.01 9.78 12.28---------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 25 50 46 21 142

12.63 15.92 10.00 9.21---------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 21 14 8 58

7.58 6.69 3.04 3.51---------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 460 228 1200

16.50 26.17 38.33 19.00=========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

642

Page 644: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q41. Death Penalty Alternative

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 20 20 26 209 76 152 171 674

31.75 19.23 26.80 58.06 61.79 65.52 78.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolut 34 79 64 113 37 71 33 431

53.97 75.96 65.98 31.39 30.08 30.60 15.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

643

Page 645: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 9 5 7 38 10 9 13 9114.29 4.81 7.22 10.56 8.13 3.88 5.99

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 360 123 232 217 1196

5.27 8.70 8.11 30.10 10.28 19.40 18.14============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 65 209 399 673

24.81 58.06 69.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 176 113 141 430

67.18 31.39 24.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 21 38 32 91

8.02 10.56 5.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 572 1194

21.94 30.15 47.91===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

644

Page 646: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 84 59 43 60 84 89 228 647

32.94 51.30 36.13 53.10 69.42 71.20 76.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 137 45 70 38 29 32 60 411

53.73 39.13 58.82 33.63 23.97 25.60 20.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 11 6 15 8 4 10 88

13.33 9.57 5.04 13.27 6.61 3.20 3.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 115 119 113 121 125 298 1146

22.25 10.03 10.38 9.86 10.56 10.91 26.00======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 185 60 400 645

37.91 53.10 73.66-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 252 38 121 411

51.64 33.63 22.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 15 22 88

10.45 13.27 4.05-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 543 1144

42.66 9.88 47.47=============================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

645

Page 647: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 163 167 212 133 675

67.36 36.87 79.40 56.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility f 71 243 50 69 433

29.34 53.64 18.73 29.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 43 5 35 91

3.31 9.49 1.87 14.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 453 267 237 1199

20.18 37.78 22.27 19.77============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 25 219 171 66 140 54 675

60.98 61.86 51.66 58.41 56.91 47.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for pa 13 106 133 39 92 49 432

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

646

Page 648: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

31.71 29.94 40.18 34.51 37.40 42.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 29 27 8 14 11 92

7.32 8.19 8.16 7.08 5.69 9.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 354 331 113 246 114 1199

3.42 29.52 27.61 9.42 20.52 9.51============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 98 172 76 173 153 672

52.13 64.91 58.46 61.57 46.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no pos 73 80 43 87 147 430

38.83 30.19 33.08 30.96 44.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 13 11 21 29 91

9.04 4.91 8.46 7.47 8.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 130 281 329 1193

15.76 22.21 10.90 23.55 27.58============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

647

Page 649: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 427 49 160 19 4 9 7 675

59.47 31.61 58.82 86.36 100.00 64.29 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely 241 77 101 3 0 4 7 433

33.57 49.68 37.13 13.64 0.00 28.57 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 50 29 11 0 0 1 0 91

6.96 18.71 4.04 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 272 22 4 14 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.69 1.83 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 408 14 71 35 122 26 676

62.96 58.33 46.71 53.85 48.22 45.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for par 200 9 70 23 104 26 432

30.86 37.50 46.05 35.38 41.11 45.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 40 1 11 7 27 5 91

6.17 4.17 7.24 10.77 10.67 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 152 65 253 57 1199

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

648

Page 650: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.05 2.00 12.68 5.42 21.10 4.75============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 340 335 675

60.50 52.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 180 252 432

32.03 39.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 50 92

7.47 7.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 562 637 1199

46.87 53.13=====================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 184 332 159 675

51.54 56.27 64.11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

649

Page 651: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 148 209 72 429

41.46 35.42 29.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 49 17 91

7.00 8.31 6.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 248 1195

29.87 49.37 20.75===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 132 187 75 51 230 675

52.59 50.95 61.48 47.22 65.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no 100 154 39 49 91 433

39.84 41.96 31.97 45.37 25.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 26 8 8 30 91

7.57 7.08 6.56 7.41 8.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 108 351 1199

20.93 30.61 10.18 9.01 29.27============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

650

Page 652: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 86 159 290 140 675

43.22 50.80 63.04 61.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 95 120 138 79 432

47.74 38.34 30.00 34.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 18 34 32 7 91

9.05 10.86 6.96 3.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 313 460 226 1198

16.61 26.13 38.40 18.86====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

651

Page 653: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q42. Life Sustaining Treatment for Pregnant Women

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the righ 3 4 12 81 36 81 90 307

5.00 3.88 12.37 22.50 29.03 35.06 42.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the rig 57 99 85 279 88 150 122 880

95.00 96.12 87.63 77.50 70.97 64.94 57.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

652

Page 654: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 60 103 97 360 124 231 212 11875.05 8.68 8.17 30.33 10.45 19.46 17.86

============================================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 19 81 207 307

7.31 22.50 36.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 241 279 360 880

92.69 77.50 63.49-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 360 567 1187

21.90 30.33 47.77=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 48 20 15 19 34 39 115 290

18.75 17.54 12.82 16.96 28.57 31.45 39.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 208 94 102 93 85 85 179 846

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

653

Page 655: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

81.25 82.46 87.18 83.04 71.43 68.55 60.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 117 112 119 124 294 1136

22.54 10.04 10.30 9.86 10.48 10.92 25.88================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 83 19 188 290

17.04 16.96 35.01-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 404 93 349 846

82.96 83.04 64.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 112 537 1136

42.87 9.86 47.27=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fet 81 77 89 62 309

33.75 17.00 33.84 26.38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

654

Page 656: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decis 159 376 174 173 882

66.25 83.00 66.16 73.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 263 235 1191

20.15 38.04 22.08 19.73============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 11 79 101 26 59 32 308

26.83 22.51 30.98 22.81 24.18 28.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 30 272 225 88 185 82 882

73.17 77.49 69.02 77.19 75.82 71.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 326 114 244 114 1190

3.45 29.50 27.39 9.58 20.50 9.58==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

655

Page 657: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

the state should have the right to prote 87 73 39 60 46 30546.52 27.76 29.77 21.58 14.07

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make 100 190 92 218 281 881

53.48 72.24 70.23 78.42 85.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 131 278 327 1186

15.77 22.18 11.05 23.44 27.57============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to 178 41 71 14 1 1 2 308

25.07 26.45 26.10 60.87 25.00 7.69 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right t 532 114 201 9 3 12 12 883

74.93 73.55 73.90 39.13 75.00 92.31 85.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 710 155 272 23 4 13 14 1191

59.61 13.01 22.84 1.93 0.34 1.09 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

656

Page 658: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 173 1 34 13 77 10 308

26.91 4.35 22.52 20.31 30.68 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 470 22 117 51 174 47 881

73.09 95.65 77.48 79.69 69.32 82.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 643 23 151 64 251 57 1189

54.08 1.93 12.70 5.38 21.11 4.79=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 133 175 308

23.96 27.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 422 460 882

76.04 72.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 555 635 1190

46.64 53.36===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

657

Page 659: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 92 154 59 305

25.77 26.42 23.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 265 429 188 882

74.23 73.58 76.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 583 247 1187

30.08 49.12 20.81=========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to pr 71 73 29 23 112 308

28.63 20.05 23.77 21.90 32.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to m 177 291 93 82 238 881

71.37 79.95 76.23 78.10 68.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 364 122 105 350 1189

20.86 30.61 10.26 8.83 29.44============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

658

Page 660: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 75 84 95 54 308

37.88 26.84 20.88 24.11----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 123 229 360 170 882

62.12 73.16 79.12 75.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 455 224 1190

16.64 26.30 38.24 18.82==============================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

659

Page 661: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q43. A↵ordable Care Act Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 21 49 31 69 5 12 6 193

33.87 47.57 31.96 19.11 4.00 5.15 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 24 38 34 58 17 4 3 178

38.71 36.89 35.05 16.07 13.60 1.72 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

660

Page 662: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 4 6 6 63 7 4 4 946.45 5.83 6.19 17.45 5.60 1.72 1.84

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 0 6 17 40 10 21 6 100

0.00 5.83 17.53 11.08 8.00 9.01 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 3 8 110 84 191 193 596

11.29 2.91 8.25 30.47 67.20 81.97 88.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 6 1 1 21 2 1 5 37

9.68 0.97 1.03 5.82 1.60 0.43 2.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 361 125 233 217 1198

5.18 8.60 8.10 30.13 10.43 19.45 18.11============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 101 69 23 193

38.55 19.11 4.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 96 58 24 178

36.64 16.07 4.18-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 16 63 15 94

6.11 17.45 2.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 40 37 100

8.78 11.08 6.45

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

661

Page 663: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 18 110 468 596

6.87 30.47 81.53-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 8 21 7 36

3.05 5.82 1.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 574 1197

21.89 30.16 47.95===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 117 16 43 6 2 2 2 188

45.70 14.04 35.83 5.36 1.65 1.61 0.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 68 40 38 15 2 5 6 174

26.56 35.09 31.67 13.39 1.65 4.03 2.01--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 19 15 16 14 2 13 3 82

7.42 13.16 13.33 12.50 1.65 10.48 1.01--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 10 18 10 11 11 14 20 94

3.91 15.79 8.33 9.82 9.09 11.29 6.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 24 18 12 62 104 89 266 575

9.38 15.79 10.00 55.36 85.95 71.77 89.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 18 7 1 4 0 1 1 32

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

662

Page 664: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.03 6.14 0.83 3.57 0.00 0.81 0.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 120 112 121 124 298 1145

22.36 9.96 10.48 9.78 10.57 10.83 26.03==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 177 6 6 189

36.20 5.36 1.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 146 15 14 175

29.86 13.39 2.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 49 14 18 81

10.02 12.50 3.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 39 11 45 95

7.98 9.82 8.27-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 53 62 459 574

10.84 55.36 84.38-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 25 4 2 31

5.11 3.57 0.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 544 1145

42.71 9.78 47.51=====================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

663

Page 665: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 182 0 5 193

2.49 40.00 0.00 2.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 12 142 2 22 178

4.98 31.21 0.75 9.28-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 15 43 5 29 92

6.22 9.45 1.89 12.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 33 30 10 26 99

13.69 6.59 3.77 10.97-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 172 44 247 136 599

71.37 9.67 93.21 57.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 3 14 1 19 37

1.24 3.08 0.38 8.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 265 237 1198

20.12 37.98 22.12 19.78=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

664

Page 666: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

========================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 34 60 20 47 29 193

7.14 9.69 18.07 17.70 18.95 25.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 8 44 36 21 53 17 179

19.05 12.54 10.84 18.58 21.37 14.78------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 7 41 25 3 11 7 94

16.67 11.68 7.53 2.65 4.44 6.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 1 42 28 9 15 4 99

2.38 11.97 8.43 7.96 6.05 3.48------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 19 179 168 54 121 58 599

45.24 51.00 50.60 47.79 48.79 50.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 4 11 15 6 1 0 37

9.52 3.13 4.52 5.31 0.40 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 351 332 113 248 115 1201

3.50 29.23 27.64 9.41 20.65 9.58========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

665

Page 667: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 24 25 18 52 73 19212.83 9.40 13.53 18.51 22.19

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 23 23 20 44 68 178

12.30 8.65 15.04 15.66 20.67---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 5 24 13 20 32 94

2.67 9.02 9.77 7.12 9.73---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 17 17 15 28 23 100

9.09 6.39 11.28 9.96 6.99---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 113 173 64 130 115 595

60.43 65.04 48.12 46.26 34.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 5 4 3 7 18 37

2.67 1.50 2.26 2.49 5.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 133 281 329 1196

15.64 22.24 11.12 23.49 27.51=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 89 60 39 4 0 1 0 193

12.38 38.22 14.34 18.18 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 89 37 45 5 0 1 0 177

12.38 23.57 16.54 22.73 0.00 8.33 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

666

Page 668: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 29 16 44 2 0 3 0 94

4.03 10.19 16.18 9.09 0.00 25.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 54 13 22 7 0 0 3 99

7.51 8.28 8.09 31.82 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 444 16 113 4 3 7 11 598

61.75 10.19 41.54 18.18 100.00 58.33 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 14 15 9 0 0 0 0 38

1.95 9.55 3.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 157 272 22 3 12 14 1199

59.97 13.09 22.69 1.83 0.25 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 97 1 30 7 47 11 193

14.97 4.55 20.00 10.77 18.43 19.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 83 5 30 9 31 19 177

12.81 22.73 20.00 13.85 12.16 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 37 3 12 2 35 5 94

5.71 13.64 8.00 3.08 13.73 8.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 38 2 14 7 35 3 99

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

667

Page 669: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.86 9.09 9.33 10.77 13.73 5.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 380 11 61 38 91 17 598

58.64 50.00 40.67 58.46 35.69 29.82-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 13 0 3 2 16 2 36

2.01 0.00 2.00 3.08 6.27 3.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 22 150 65 255 57 1197

54.14 1.84 12.53 5.43 21.30 4.76=======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 89 104 193

15.81 16.30-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 73 105 178

12.97 16.46-------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 49 93

7.82 7.68-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 47 53 100

8.35 8.31-------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 294 305 599

52.22 47.81-------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

668

Page 670: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 16 22 382.84 3.45

-------------------------------------------------------------Total 563 638 1201

46.88 53.12=============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 72 95 27 194

20.11 16.05 10.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 71 92 15 178

19.83 15.54 6.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 37 39 18 94

10.34 6.59 7.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 29 52 18 99

8.10 8.78 7.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 133 297 166 596

37.15 50.17 66.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 16 17 5 38

4.47 2.87 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 592 249 1199

29.86 49.37 20.77

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

669

Page 671: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 48 66 15 30 34 193

19.20 17.89 12.40 28.04 9.66------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 42 65 16 24 31 178

16.80 17.62 13.22 22.43 8.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 17 28 11 10 27 93

6.80 7.59 9.09 9.35 7.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 20 26 11 2 40 99

8.00 7.05 9.09 1.87 11.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 118 171 66 38 206 599

47.20 46.34 54.55 35.51 58.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 5 13 2 3 14 37

2.00 3.52 1.65 2.80 3.98------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 369 121 107 352 1199

20.85 30.78 10.09 8.92 29.36==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

670

Page 672: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

============================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 21 55 87 31 194

10.61 17.52 18.83 13.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 30 44 75 28 177

15.15 14.01 16.23 12.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 29 29 29 7 94

14.65 9.24 6.28 3.08----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 26 37 24 13 100

13.13 11.78 5.19 5.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 76 144 236 143 599

38.38 45.86 51.08 63.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 16 5 11 5 37

8.08 1.59 2.38 2.20----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 462 227 1201

16.49 26.14 38.47 18.90============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

671

Page 673: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q44. A↵ordable Care Act Preference

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 13 14 14 32 4 9 6 92

20.97 13.46 14.58 8.94 3.28 3.90 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 38 82 60 153 18 23 7 381

61.29 78.85 62.50 42.74 14.75 9.96 3.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

672

Page 674: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Work to repeal the law 1 2 14 56 42 89 104 3081.61 1.92 14.58 15.64 34.43 38.53 47.71

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and rep 3 4 7 76 49 106 89 334

4.84 3.85 7.29 21.23 40.16 45.89 40.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 7 2 1 41 9 4 12 76

11.29 1.92 1.04 11.45 7.38 1.73 5.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 358 122 231 218 1191

5.21 8.73 8.06 30.06 10.24 19.40 18.30============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 41 32 19 92

15.59 8.94 3.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 180 153 48 381

68.44 42.74 8.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 17 56 235 308

6.46 15.64 41.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 15 76 244 335

5.70 21.23 42.73---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 10 41 25 76

3.80 11.45 4.38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

673

Page 675: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 571 1192

22.06 30.03 47.90=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 60 6 12 5 1 1 2 87

23.62 5.31 10.08 4.42 0.83 0.81 0.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 135 71 90 32 5 18 22 373

53.15 62.83 75.63 28.32 4.13 14.52 7.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 11 10 8 33 51 42 141 296

4.33 8.85 6.72 29.20 42.15 33.87 47.64------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 24 15 8 33 63 55 120 318

9.45 13.27 6.72 29.20 52.07 44.35 40.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 24 11 1 10 1 8 11 66

9.45 9.73 0.84 8.85 0.83 6.45 3.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 119 113 121 124 296 1140

22.28 9.91 10.44 9.91 10.61 10.88 25.96====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

674

Page 676: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 78 5 4 87

16.05 4.42 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 296 32 45 373

60.91 28.32 8.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 29 33 234 296

5.97 29.20 43.17-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 47 33 239 319

9.67 29.20 44.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 36 10 20 66

7.41 8.85 3.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 542 1141

42.59 9.90 47.50===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 7 79 0 5 91

2.92 17.36 0.00 2.13

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

675

Page 677: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 37 288 9 48 382

15.42 63.30 3.37 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 91 28 129 62 310

37.92 6.15 48.31 26.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with somethi 91 36 128 82 337

37.92 7.91 47.94 34.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 14 24 1 38 77

5.83 5.27 0.37 16.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 455 267 235 1197

20.05 38.01 22.31 19.63============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 2 16 22 10 26 15 91

4.88 4.55 6.61 8.85 10.61 13.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 11 105 104 38 81 44 383

26.83 29.83 31.23 33.63 33.06 38.60--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 13 104 80 30 60 23 310

31.71 29.55 24.02 26.55 24.49 20.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something el 11 97 96 30 72 31 337

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

676

Page 678: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

26.83 27.56 28.83 26.55 29.39 27.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 4 30 31 5 6 1 77

9.76 8.52 9.31 4.42 2.45 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 333 113 245 114 1198

3.42 29.38 27.80 9.43 20.45 9.52============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 13 23 10 23 22 91

6.99 8.71 7.63 8.16 6.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 39 49 46 99 148 381

20.97 18.56 35.11 35.11 45.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 60 81 34 82 52 309

32.26 30.68 25.95 29.08 15.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it wi 61 100 34 62 76 333

32.80 37.88 25.95 21.99 23.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 13 11 7 16 29 76

6.99 4.17 5.34 5.67 8.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 264 131 282 327 1190

15.63 22.18 11.01 23.70 27.48============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

677

Page 679: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 34 38 18 0 0 0 0 90

4.74 24.52 6.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 194 67 107 8 0 4 0 380

27.02 43.23 39.78 40.00 0.00 33.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 232 12 55 3 1 4 3 310

32.31 7.74 20.45 15.00 33.33 33.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace 227 14 68 9 2 4 11 335

31.62 9.03 25.28 45.00 66.67 33.33 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 31 24 21 0 0 0 0 76

4.32 15.48 7.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 269 20 3 12 14 1191

60.29 13.01 22.59 1.68 0.25 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

678

Page 680: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 37 0 14 6 29 4 90

5.72 0.00 9.21 9.38 11.51 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 179 6 66 15 84 31 381

27.67 26.09 43.42 23.44 33.33 55.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 190 4 23 19 64 10 310

29.37 17.39 15.13 29.69 25.40 17.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something els 204 11 40 21 52 9 337

31.53 47.83 26.32 32.81 20.63 16.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 37 2 9 3 23 2 76

5.72 8.70 5.92 4.69 9.13 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 152 64 252 56 1194

54.19 1.93 12.73 5.36 21.11 4.69============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 34 57 91

6.08 8.95-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 174 208 382

31.13 32.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

679

Page 681: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Work to repeal the law 160 150 31028.62 23.55

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 164 173 337

29.34 27.16-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 27 49 76

4.83 7.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 559 637 1196

46.74 53.26===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 32 50 9 91

8.99 8.47 3.67---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 152 178 52 382

42.70 30.17 21.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 52 165 93 310

14.61 27.97 37.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 90 163 79 332

25.28 27.63 32.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 30 34 12 76

8.43 5.76 4.90

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

680

Page 682: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 245 1191

29.89 49.54 20.57=============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 23 36 6 11 16 92

9.16 9.78 4.92 10.48 4.60--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 82 125 42 52 81 382

32.67 33.97 34.43 49.52 23.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 69 75 29 18 118 309

27.49 20.38 23.77 17.14 33.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it 61 107 36 23 109 336

24.30 29.08 29.51 21.90 31.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 16 25 9 1 24 75

6.37 6.79 7.38 0.95 6.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 105 348 1194

21.02 30.82 10.22 8.79 29.15============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

681

Page 683: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==================================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 13 24 38 16 91

6.57 7.74 8.24 7.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 58 107 160 57 382

29.29 34.52 34.71 25.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 58 77 112 64 311

29.29 24.84 24.30 28.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 45 81 132 78 336

22.73 26.13 28.63 34.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 24 21 19 12 76

12.12 6.77 4.12 5.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 310 461 227 1196

16.56 25.92 38.55 18.98==================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

682

Page 684: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q45. In-State Tuition for Illegal Immigrants

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 35 70 55 133 37 36 37 403

56.45 67.31 56.70 36.94 29.60 15.52 16.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 11 19 29 143 75 160 151 588

17.74 18.27 29.90 39.72 60.00 68.97 69.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

683

Page 685: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/no opinion 16 15 13 84 13 36 30 20725.81 14.42 13.40 23.33 10.40 15.52 13.76

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 97 360 125 232 218 1198

5.18 8.68 8.10 30.05 10.43 19.37 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 160 133 109 402

60.84 36.94 19.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 59 143 386 588

22.43 39.72 67.36-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 44 84 78 206

16.73 23.33 13.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 573 1196

21.99 30.10 47.91===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

684

Page 686: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 137 58 64 33 19 28 47 386

53.52 50.88 53.78 29.46 15.70 22.58 15.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 55 40 36 56 90 77 214 568

21.48 35.09 30.25 50.00 74.38 62.10 71.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 64 16 19 23 12 19 37 190

25.00 14.04 15.97 20.54 9.92 15.32 12.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 119 112 121 124 298 1144

22.38 9.97 10.40 9.79 10.58 10.84 26.05==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 259 33 94 386

53.07 29.46 17.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 131 56 381 568

26.84 50.00 70.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 98 23 69 190

20.08 20.54 12.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 544 1144

42.66 9.79 47.55=================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

685

Page 687: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 66 244 27 66 403

27.39 53.63 10.15 27.62-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 140 125 219 107 591

58.09 27.47 82.33 44.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 35 86 20 66 207

14.52 18.90 7.52 27.62-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 266 239 1201

20.07 37.89 22.15 19.90=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 11 108 104 39 92 50 404

26.83 30.59 31.33 34.21 37.25 43.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 23 178 157 54 125 55 592

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

686

Page 688: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

56.10 50.42 47.29 47.37 50.61 47.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 7 67 71 21 30 10 206

17.07 18.98 21.39 18.42 12.15 8.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 247 115 1202

3.41 29.37 27.62 9.48 20.55 9.57====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 51 78 47 110 117 403

27.13 29.32 35.61 39.01 35.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 109 141 61 134 142 587

57.98 53.01 46.21 47.52 43.16-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 28 47 24 38 70 207

14.89 17.67 18.18 13.48 21.28-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 132 282 329 1197

15.71 22.22 11.03 23.56 27.49===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

687

Page 689: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 197 52 130 12 0 8 4 403

27.44 33.55 47.79 54.55 0.00 57.14 30.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 405 55 102 10 4 5 9 590

56.41 35.48 37.50 45.45 100.00 35.71 69.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 116 48 40 0 0 1 0 205

16.16 30.97 14.71 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 272 22 4 14 13 1198

59.93 12.94 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 186 7 59 18 99 34 403

28.75 30.43 39.07 28.12 38.98 59.65-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 354 12 65 30 113 15 589

54.71 52.17 43.05 46.88 44.49 26.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 107 4 27 16 42 8 204

16.54 17.39 17.88 25.00 16.54 14.04-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 151 64 254 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

688

Page 690: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.10 1.92 12.63 5.35 21.24 4.77===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total---------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 189 214 403

33.69 33.54---------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 289 301 590

51.52 47.18---------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 83 123 206

14.80 19.28---------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 157 176 66 399

43.98 29.83 26.51

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

689

Page 691: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 132 312 146 590

36.97 52.88 58.63-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 68 102 37 207

19.05 17.29 14.86-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 249 1196

29.85 49.33 20.82===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 86 119 42 57 100 404

34.26 32.34 34.43 52.78 28.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 131 168 60 34 197 590

52.19 45.65 49.18 31.48 56.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 34 81 20 17 54 206

13.55 22.01 16.39 15.74 15.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 351 1200

20.92 30.67 10.17 9.00 29.25======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

690

Page 692: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 82 126 133 62 403

41.41 40.13 28.79 27.31------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 82 127 255 127 591

41.41 40.45 55.19 55.95------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 34 61 74 38 207

17.17 19.43 16.02 16.74------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 462 227 1201

16.49 26.14 38.47 18.90========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

691

Page 693: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46A. Agree/Disagree: Most immigrants pay their fair share of taxes

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 20 44 26 37 14 14 17 172

31.75 42.31 26.80 10.51 11.20 6.03 7.87-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 22 35 28 78 22 33 25 243

34.92 33.65 28.87 22.16 17.60 14.22 11.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

692

Page 694: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 4 11 19 72 20 47 20 1936.35 10.58 19.59 20.45 16.00 20.26 9.26

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 8 11 14 116 60 132 132 473

12.70 10.58 14.43 32.95 48.00 56.90 61.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 3 10 49 9 6 22 108

14.29 2.88 10.31 13.92 7.20 2.59 10.19-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 352 125 232 216 1189

5.30 8.75 8.16 29.60 10.51 19.51 18.17===============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 90 37 45 172

34.22 10.51 7.84-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 85 78 80 243

32.32 22.16 13.94-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 33 72 87 192

12.55 20.45 15.16-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 33 116 324 473

12.55 32.95 56.45-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 49 38 109

8.37 13.92 6.62

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

693

Page 695: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 352 574 1189

22.12 29.60 48.28=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 81 18 26 16 5 4 17 167

31.64 15.79 23.01 14.29 4.13 3.23 5.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 78 27 40 20 16 18 39 238

30.47 23.68 35.40 17.86 13.22 14.52 13.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 36 22 22 13 17 27 48 185

14.06 19.30 19.47 11.61 14.05 21.77 16.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 36 32 21 48 73 65 177 452

14.06 28.07 18.58 42.86 60.33 52.42 59.60--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 15 4 15 10 10 16 95

9.77 13.16 3.54 13.39 8.26 8.06 5.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 113 112 121 124 297 1137

22.52 10.03 9.94 9.85 10.64 10.91 26.12============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

694

Page 696: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 125 16 26 167

25.99 14.29 4.80-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 144 20 73 237

29.94 17.86 13.47-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 80 13 91 184

16.63 11.61 16.79-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 89 48 316 453

18.50 42.86 58.30-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 43 15 36 94

8.94 13.39 6.64-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 481 112 542 1135

42.38 9.87 47.75===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 21 119 8 24 172

8.75 26.50 3.00 10.13

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

695

Page 697: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 48 141 25 29 243

20.00 31.40 9.36 12.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 34 79 41 39 193

14.17 17.59 15.36 16.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 116 81 182 97 476

48.33 18.04 68.16 40.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 21 29 11 48 109

8.75 6.46 4.12 20.25-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 449 267 237 1193

20.12 37.64 22.38 19.87===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 6 55 38 18 36 18 171

14.63 15.80 11.52 15.93 14.63 15.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 4 67 63 28 52 29 243

9.76 19.25 19.09 24.78 21.14 25.44------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 7 56 58 12 48 12 193

17.07 16.09 17.58 10.62 19.51 10.53------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 18 138 134 43 93 50 476

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

696

Page 698: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

43.90 39.66 40.61 38.05 37.80 43.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 32 37 12 17 5 109

14.63 9.20 11.21 10.62 6.91 4.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 348 330 113 246 114 1192

3.44 29.19 27.68 9.48 20.64 9.56======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 22 42 19 33 56 172

11.70 15.79 14.39 11.91 17.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 26 46 29 63 79 243

13.83 17.29 21.97 22.74 24.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 28 36 25 65 40 194

14.89 13.53 18.94 23.47 12.27---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 96 118 48 95 115 472

51.06 44.36 36.36 34.30 35.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 24 11 21 36 108

8.51 9.02 8.33 7.58 11.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 132 277 326 1189

15.81 22.37 11.10 23.30 27.42=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

697

Page 699: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 62 35 65 5 0 2 3 172

8.66 22.58 24.25 22.73 0.00 14.29 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 139 32 66 1 0 4 1 243

19.41 20.65 24.63 4.55 0.00 28.57 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 107 21 49 13 0 3 0 193

14.94 13.55 18.28 59.09 0.00 21.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 344 44 70 2 3 5 7 475

48.04 28.39 26.12 9.09 100.00 35.71 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 64 23 18 1 0 0 3 109

8.94 14.84 6.72 4.55 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 268 22 3 14 14 1192

60.07 13.00 22.48 1.85 0.25 1.17 1.17======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

698

Page 700: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 76 4 24 2 50 16 172

11.71 16.67 15.89 3.03 20.24 28.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 113 7 37 14 62 10 243

17.41 29.17 24.50 21.21 25.10 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 110 3 17 14 46 4 194

16.95 12.50 11.26 21.21 18.62 7.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 299 8 62 31 58 19 477

46.07 33.33 41.06 46.97 23.48 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 2 11 5 31 8 108

7.86 8.33 7.28 7.58 12.55 14.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 66 247 57 1194

54.36 2.01 12.65 5.53 20.69 4.77=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------Strongly agree 98 74 172

17.69 11.60-------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 104 139 243

18.77 21.79-------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

699

Page 701: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 80 113 19314.44 17.71

-------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 222 253 475

40.07 39.66-------------------------------------------Don't know 50 59 109

9.03 9.25-------------------------------------------Total 554 638 1192

46.48 53.52===========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 67 85 20 172

19.09 14.41 8.10-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 93 112 39 244

26.50 18.98 15.79-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 48 107 38 193

13.68 18.14 15.38-----------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 113 236 125 474

32.19 40.00 50.61-----------------------------------------------------Don't know 30 50 25 105

8.55 8.47 10.12

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

700

Page 702: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------Total 351 590 247 1188

29.55 49.66 20.79=====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 36 62 18 23 33 172

14.34 16.94 14.75 21.50 9.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 58 76 17 35 57 243

23.11 20.77 13.93 32.71 16.47------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 40 63 10 16 64 193

15.94 17.21 8.20 14.95 18.50------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 98 136 65 25 152 476

39.04 37.16 53.28 23.36 43.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 29 12 8 40 108

7.57 7.92 9.84 7.48 11.56------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 122 107 346 1192

21.06 30.70 10.23 8.98 29.03========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

701

Page 703: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 35 53 64 19 171

17.68 17.04 14.04 8.44----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 44 68 92 39 243

22.22 21.86 20.18 17.33----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 36 52 65 40 193

18.18 16.72 14.25 17.78----------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 47 108 206 113 474

23.74 34.73 45.18 50.22----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 30 29 14 109

18.18 9.65 6.36 6.22----------------------------------------------------------Total 198 311 456 225 1190

16.64 26.13 38.32 18.91==========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

702

Page 704: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46B. Agree/Disagree: We should restrict and control people coming to live in the U.S. more than we do now

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 17 16 17 156 67 154 167 594

27.42 15.38 17.53 44.32 53.60 66.67 76.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 13 29 37 86 30 48 28 271

20.97 27.88 38.14 24.43 24.00 20.78 12.84-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

703

Page 705: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 11 36 36 52 7 15 5 16217.74 34.62 37.11 14.77 5.60 6.49 2.29

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 14 19 6 23 14 8 6 90

22.58 18.27 6.19 6.53 11.20 3.46 2.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 4 1 35 7 6 12 72

11.29 3.85 1.03 9.94 5.60 2.60 5.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 97 352 125 231 218 1189

5.21 8.75 8.16 29.60 10.51 19.43 18.33===============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 50 156 388 594

18.94 44.32 67.71-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 79 86 107 272

29.92 24.43 18.67-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 83 52 27 162

31.44 14.77 4.71-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 40 23 27 90

15.15 6.53 4.71-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 35 24 71

4.55 9.94 4.19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

704

Page 706: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 352 573 1189

22.20 29.60 48.19=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 67 36 29 52 87 85 213 569

26.27 31.86 25.66 46.02 71.90 68.55 71.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 72 30 30 34 22 24 53 265

28.24 26.55 26.55 30.09 18.18 19.35 17.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 58 22 43 13 7 5 12 160

22.75 19.47 38.05 11.50 5.79 4.03 4.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 37 14 9 7 4 2 8 81

14.51 12.39 7.96 6.19 3.31 1.61 2.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 21 11 2 7 1 8 10 60

8.24 9.73 1.77 6.19 0.83 6.45 3.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 113 113 121 124 296 1135

22.47 9.96 9.96 9.96 10.66 10.93 26.08============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

705

Page 707: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 133 52 385 570

27.59 46.02 71.16-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 133 34 99 266

27.59 30.09 18.30-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 123 13 23 159

25.52 11.50 4.25-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 60 7 15 82

12.45 6.19 2.77-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 7 19 59

6.85 6.19 3.51-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 113 541 1136

42.43 9.95 47.62===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 143 122 211 120 596

59.83 27.11 79.62 50.63

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

706

Page 708: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 62 125 42 44 273

25.94 27.78 15.85 18.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 12 118 8 24 162

5.02 26.22 3.02 10.13-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 10 60 3 16 89

4.18 13.33 1.13 6.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 25 1 33 71

5.02 5.56 0.38 13.92-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 450 265 237 1191

20.07 37.78 22.25 19.90===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 29 192 153 61 117 44 596

70.73 55.49 46.08 53.98 47.56 38.26------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 2 79 81 21 59 32 274

4.88 22.83 24.40 18.58 23.98 27.83------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 1 31 46 18 49 18 163

2.44 8.96 13.86 15.93 19.92 15.65------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 5 19 25 7 15 18 89

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

707

Page 709: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

12.20 5.49 7.53 6.19 6.10 15.65------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 25 27 6 6 3 71

9.76 7.23 8.13 5.31 2.44 2.61------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 346 332 113 246 115 1193

3.44 29.00 27.83 9.47 20.62 9.64======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 105 142 71 135 140 593

55.85 53.79 53.79 48.56 43.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 41 76 26 67 63 273

21.81 28.79 19.70 24.10 19.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 22 19 16 44 61 162

11.70 7.20 12.12 15.83 18.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 13 11 9 21 34 88

6.91 4.17 6.82 7.55 10.46---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 16 10 11 27 71

3.72 6.06 7.58 3.96 8.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 264 132 278 325 1187

15.84 22.24 11.12 23.42 27.38=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

708

Page 710: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 397 60 114 5 3 6 11 596

55.60 38.71 42.54 23.81 75.00 46.15 73.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 149 43 64 13 0 4 1 274

20.87 27.74 23.88 61.90 0.00 30.77 6.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 82 29 43 2 0 3 3 162

11.48 18.71 16.04 9.52 0.00 23.08 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 50 8 29 0 1 0 0 88

7.00 5.16 10.82 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 15 18 1 0 0 0 70

5.04 9.68 6.72 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 155 268 21 4 13 15 1190

60.00 13.03 22.52 1.76 0.34 1.09 1.26======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

709

Page 711: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 344 13 70 49 100 20 596

53.17 56.52 46.36 74.24 40.32 35.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 146 7 32 7 68 13 273

22.57 30.43 21.19 10.61 27.42 22.81-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 74 1 30 6 37 14 162

11.44 4.35 19.87 9.09 14.92 24.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 49 2 12 1 21 4 89

7.57 8.70 7.95 1.52 8.47 7.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 0 7 3 22 6 72

5.26 0.00 4.64 4.55 8.87 10.53-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 151 66 248 57 1192

54.28 1.93 12.67 5.54 20.81 4.78=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------Strongly agree 284 312 596

51.26 48.98-------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 133 140 273

24.01 21.98-------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

710

Page 712: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 64 98 16211.55 15.38

-------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 44 45 89

7.94 7.06-------------------------------------------Don't know 29 42 71

5.23 6.59-------------------------------------------Total 554 637 1191

46.52 53.48===========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 162 288 146 596

46.15 48.90 59.11-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 71 154 47 272

20.23 26.15 19.03-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 59 80 24 163

16.81 13.58 9.72-----------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 40 34 11 85

11.40 5.77 4.45-----------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 33 19 71

5.41 5.60 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

711

Page 713: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------Total 351 589 247 1187

29.57 49.62 20.81=====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 132 185 64 35 180 596

52.80 50.55 52.46 32.41 52.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 56 82 25 37 72 272

22.40 22.40 20.49 34.26 20.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 35 49 14 23 41 162

14.00 13.39 11.48 21.30 11.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 16 27 14 10 23 90

6.40 7.38 11.48 9.26 6.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 23 5 3 29 71

4.40 6.28 4.10 2.78 8.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 122 108 345 1191

20.99 30.73 10.24 9.07 28.97========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

712

Page 714: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 61 126 257 153 597

30.96 40.26 56.36 67.70----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 65 75 95 38 273

32.99 23.96 20.83 16.81----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 28 56 59 19 162

14.21 17.89 12.94 8.41----------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 19 29 33 8 89

9.64 9.27 7.24 3.54----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 27 12 8 71

12.18 8.63 2.63 3.54----------------------------------------------------------Total 197 313 456 226 1192

16.53 26.26 38.26 18.96==========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

713

Page 715: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46C. Agree/Disagree: Newcomers from other countries enrich Texas with their hard work and values

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 30 37 36 78 22 21 29 253

48.39 35.92 37.50 22.03 17.74 9.05 13.36-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 19 52 39 121 56 109 74 470

30.65 50.49 40.62 34.18 45.16 46.98 34.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

714

Page 716: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 4 6 14 60 20 54 45 2036.45 5.83 14.58 16.95 16.13 23.28 20.74

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 3 3 5 54 20 40 45 170

4.84 2.91 5.21 15.25 16.13 17.24 20.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 5 2 41 6 8 24 92

9.68 4.85 2.08 11.58 4.84 3.45 11.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 354 124 232 217 1188

5.22 8.67 8.08 29.80 10.44 19.53 18.27===============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 103 78 72 253

39.46 22.03 12.52-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 110 121 239 470

42.15 34.18 41.57-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 24 60 120 204

9.20 16.95 20.87-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 11 54 105 170

4.21 15.25 18.26-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 41 39 93

4.98 11.58 6.78

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

715

Page 717: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 354 575 1190

21.93 29.75 48.32=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 92 26 54 14 9 16 34 245

36.22 23.01 46.96 12.50 7.44 12.80 11.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 101 52 37 40 53 52 118 453

39.76 46.02 32.17 35.71 43.80 41.60 39.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 20 13 14 26 33 33 59 198

7.87 11.50 12.17 23.21 27.27 26.40 19.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 17 11 8 22 20 14 66 158

6.69 9.73 6.96 19.64 16.53 11.20 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 11 2 10 6 10 20 83

9.45 9.73 1.74 8.93 4.96 8.00 6.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 115 112 121 125 297 1137

22.34 9.94 10.11 9.85 10.64 10.99 26.12============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

716

Page 718: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 172 14 59 245

35.68 12.50 10.87-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 190 40 223 453

39.42 35.71 41.07-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 47 26 124 197

9.75 23.21 22.84-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 36 22 101 159

7.47 19.64 18.60-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 10 36 83

7.68 8.93 6.63-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 543 1137

42.39 9.85 47.76===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 32 165 22 35 254

13.33 36.83 8.27 14.71

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

717

Page 719: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 94 188 102 87 471

39.17 41.96 38.35 36.55-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 52 40 70 43 205

21.67 8.93 26.32 18.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 42 32 62 34 170

17.50 7.14 23.31 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 23 10 39 92

8.33 5.13 3.76 16.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 448 266 238 1192

20.13 37.58 22.32 19.97===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 5 57 68 22 61 41 254

12.50 16.38 20.48 19.47 24.70 35.96------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 14 130 125 49 107 46 471

35.00 37.36 37.65 43.36 43.32 40.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 6 71 51 17 43 18 206

15.00 20.40 15.36 15.04 17.41 15.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 10 61 52 16 26 6 171

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

718

Page 720: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

25.00 17.53 15.66 14.16 10.53 5.26------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 29 36 9 10 3 92

12.50 8.33 10.84 7.96 4.05 2.63------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 348 332 113 247 114 1194

3.35 29.15 27.81 9.46 20.69 9.55======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 30 59 28 65 73 255

16.04 22.26 21.37 23.55 22.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 71 106 52 109 131 469

37.97 40.00 39.69 39.49 40.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 31 58 25 45 45 204

16.58 21.89 19.08 16.30 13.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 41 22 19 38 46 166

21.93 8.30 14.50 13.77 14.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 20 7 19 32 92

7.49 7.55 5.34 6.88 9.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 276 327 1186

15.77 22.34 11.05 23.27 27.57=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

719

Page 721: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 126 33 80 3 2 5 5 254

17.55 21.29 29.85 13.04 50.00 35.71 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 290 62 98 14 0 5 3 472

40.39 40.00 36.57 60.87 0.00 35.71 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 139 20 37 4 1 3 2 206

19.36 12.90 13.81 17.39 25.00 21.43 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 109 21 37 0 1 1 1 170

15.18 13.55 13.81 0.00 25.00 7.14 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 54 19 16 2 0 0 3 94

7.52 12.26 5.97 8.70 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 268 23 4 14 14 1196

60.03 12.96 22.41 1.92 0.33 1.17 1.17======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

720

Page 722: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 117 6 42 11 69 9 254

18.06 25.00 28.00 17.19 27.82 15.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 276 9 48 20 90 28 471

42.59 37.50 32.00 31.25 36.29 49.12-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 130 1 22 12 31 8 204

20.06 4.17 14.67 18.75 12.50 14.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 86 7 26 12 31 8 170

13.27 29.17 17.33 18.75 12.50 14.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 39 1 12 9 27 4 92

6.02 4.17 8.00 14.06 10.89 7.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 150 64 248 57 1191

54.41 2.02 12.59 5.37 20.82 4.79=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------Strongly agree 126 127 253

22.74 19.94-------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 207 264 471

37.36 41.44-------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

721

Page 723: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 102 103 20518.41 16.17

-------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 78 92 170

14.08 14.44-------------------------------------------Don't know 41 51 92

7.40 8.01-------------------------------------------Total 554 637 1191

46.52 53.48===========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 106 109 36 251

30.11 18.51 14.57-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 120 257 93 470

34.09 43.63 37.65-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 55 99 51 205

15.62 16.81 20.65-----------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 45 78 46 169

12.78 13.24 18.62-----------------------------------------------------Don't know 26 46 21 93

7.39 7.81 8.50

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

722

Page 724: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------Total 352 589 247 1188

29.63 49.58 20.79=====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 51 71 23 42 66 253

20.32 19.35 19.01 39.25 19.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 106 155 45 35 130 471

42.23 42.23 37.19 32.71 37.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 41 64 23 14 63 205

16.33 17.44 19.01 13.08 18.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 37 52 21 10 51 171

14.74 14.17 17.36 9.35 14.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 25 9 6 36 92

6.37 6.81 7.44 5.61 10.40------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 121 107 346 1192

21.06 30.79 10.15 8.98 29.03========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

723

Page 725: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 51 72 93 38 254

25.76 23.00 20.35 16.81----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 71 119 186 95 471

35.86 38.02 40.70 42.04----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 23 60 79 43 205

11.62 19.17 17.29 19.03----------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 29 34 77 31 171

14.65 10.86 16.85 13.72----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 28 22 19 93

12.12 8.95 4.81 8.41----------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 457 226 1194

16.58 26.21 38.27 18.93==========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

724

Page 726: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46D. Agree/Disagree: Undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States should be deported immediately

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 11 7 12 104 34 90 122 380

17.46 6.80 12.50 29.05 27.20 39.13 55.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 3 8 15 73 34 88 45 266

4.76 7.77 15.62 20.39 27.20 38.26 20.64-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

725

Page 727: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 9 18 24 66 35 32 25 20914.29 17.48 25.00 18.44 28.00 13.91 11.47

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 31 66 43 76 19 17 13 265

49.21 64.08 44.79 21.23 15.20 7.39 5.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 4 2 39 3 3 13 73

14.29 3.88 2.08 10.89 2.40 1.30 5.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 358 125 230 218 1193

5.28 8.63 8.05 30.01 10.48 19.28 18.27===============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 29 104 246 379

11.07 29.05 43.01-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 27 73 166 266

10.31 20.39 29.02-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 51 66 92 209

19.47 18.44 16.08-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 140 76 50 266

53.44 21.23 8.74-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 39 18 72

5.73 10.89 3.15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

726

Page 728: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 358 572 1192

21.98 30.03 47.99=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 46 23 19 40 56 38 141 363

18.04 20.54 15.97 35.40 46.28 30.65 47.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 41 14 14 24 38 34 90 255

16.08 12.50 11.76 21.24 31.40 27.42 30.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 47 25 21 20 19 35 32 199

18.43 22.32 17.65 17.70 15.70 28.23 10.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 97 41 61 22 6 10 23 260

38.04 36.61 51.26 19.47 4.96 8.06 7.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 9 4 7 2 7 10 63

9.41 8.04 3.36 6.19 1.65 5.65 3.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 112 119 113 121 124 296 1140

22.37 9.82 10.44 9.91 10.61 10.88 25.96============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

727

Page 729: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 89 40 236 365

18.28 35.40 43.62-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 70 24 162 256

14.37 21.24 29.94-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 92 20 86 198

18.89 17.70 15.90-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 198 22 39 259

40.66 19.47 7.21-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 38 7 18 63

7.80 6.19 3.33-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 113 541 1141

42.68 9.90 47.41===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 88 73 142 79 382

36.82 16.15 53.58 33.19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

728

Page 730: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 67 65 82 52 266

28.03 14.38 30.94 21.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 46 88 28 46 208

19.25 19.47 10.57 19.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 27 199 12 28 266

11.30 44.03 4.53 11.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 27 1 33 72

4.60 5.97 0.38 13.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 452 265 238 1194

20.02 37.86 22.19 19.93===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 12 135 106 35 61 34 383

28.57 38.24 32.22 30.97 24.90 29.82------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 13 81 66 27 62 17 266

30.95 22.95 20.06 23.89 25.31 14.91------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 6 47 67 20 42 26 208

14.29 13.31 20.36 17.70 17.14 22.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 5 67 62 27 70 35 266

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

729

Page 731: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

11.90 18.98 18.84 23.89 28.57 30.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 23 28 4 10 2 73

14.29 6.52 8.51 3.54 4.08 1.75------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 353 329 113 245 114 1196

3.51 29.52 27.51 9.45 20.48 9.53======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 84 94 36 84 84 382

44.68 35.34 27.69 29.89 25.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 47 70 32 61 55 265

25.00 26.32 24.62 21.71 16.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 20 49 29 46 62 206

10.64 18.42 22.31 16.37 18.90---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 27 42 23 80 94 266

14.36 15.79 17.69 28.47 28.66---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 11 10 10 33 74

5.32 4.14 7.69 3.56 10.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 130 281 328 1193

15.76 22.30 10.90 23.55 27.49=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

730

Page 732: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 251 50 59 9 3 3 7 382

34.96 32.47 21.69 40.91 75.00 23.08 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 180 27 44 9 1 3 2 266

25.07 17.53 16.18 40.91 25.00 23.08 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 107 26 68 1 0 5 2 209

14.90 16.88 25.00 4.55 0.00 38.46 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 141 29 90 2 0 2 3 267

19.64 18.83 33.09 9.09 0.00 15.38 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 39 22 11 1 0 0 0 73

5.43 14.29 4.04 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 272 22 4 13 14 1197

59.98 12.87 22.72 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

731

Page 733: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 216 10 49 24 73 10 382

33.28 43.48 33.11 37.50 28.85 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 146 4 24 18 64 10 266

22.50 17.39 16.22 28.12 25.30 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 128 5 21 11 38 6 209

19.72 21.74 14.19 17.19 15.02 10.53-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 127 4 47 7 56 24 265

19.57 17.39 31.76 10.94 22.13 42.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 0 7 4 22 7 72

4.93 0.00 4.73 6.25 8.70 12.28-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 23 148 64 253 57 1194

54.36 1.93 12.40 5.36 21.19 4.77=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------Strongly agree 179 203 382

31.91 31.92-------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 136 130 266

24.24 20.44-------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

732

Page 734: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 82 128 21014.62 20.13

-------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 132 134 266

23.53 21.07-------------------------------------------Don't know 32 41 73

5.70 6.45-------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13===========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 85 203 92 380

24.08 34.52 37.25-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 69 123 73 265

19.55 20.92 29.55-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 72 103 31 206

20.40 17.52 12.55-----------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 105 128 32 265

29.75 21.77 12.96-----------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 31 19 72

6.23 5.27 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

733

Page 735: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------Total 353 588 247 1188

29.71 49.49 20.79=====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 92 120 30 23 117 382

36.80 32.97 24.59 21.70 33.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 58 73 28 17 89 265

23.20 20.05 22.95 16.04 25.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 47 54 26 27 56 210

18.80 14.84 21.31 25.47 15.91------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 44 95 33 34 59 265

17.60 26.10 27.05 32.08 16.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 22 5 5 31 72

3.60 6.04 4.10 4.72 8.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 364 122 106 352 1194

20.94 30.49 10.22 8.88 29.48========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

734

Page 736: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 53 84 171 73 381

26.90 27.18 37.01 32.30----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 45 61 96 64 266

22.84 19.74 20.78 28.32----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 42 59 78 30 209

21.32 19.09 16.88 13.27----------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 33 82 102 49 266

16.75 26.54 22.08 21.68----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 23 15 10 72

12.18 7.44 3.25 4.42----------------------------------------------------------Total 197 309 462 226 1194

16.50 25.88 38.69 18.93==========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

735

Page 737: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47A. Abortion Exceptions: The woman’s own health is seriously endangered

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 55 101 87 279 97 165 120 904

87.30 98.06 90.62 78.15 79.51 71.12 55.30------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 3 1 6 33 15 45 53 156

4.76 0.97 6.25 9.24 12.30 19.40 24.42------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

736

Page 738: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 1 3 45 10 22 44 1307.94 0.97 3.12 12.61 8.20 9.48 20.28

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 357 122 232 217 1190

5.29 8.66 8.07 30.00 10.25 19.50 18.24====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 243 279 382 904

92.40 78.15 67.02----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 11 33 113 157

4.18 9.24 19.82----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 45 75 129

3.42 12.61 13.16----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 357 570 1190

22.10 30.00 47.90======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

737

Page 739: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 212 90 111 85 96 93 187 874

82.49 78.95 94.07 76.58 80.67 75.00 63.39-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 25 15 6 10 13 14 67 150

9.73 13.16 5.08 9.01 10.92 11.29 22.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 9 1 16 10 17 41 114

7.78 7.89 0.85 14.41 8.40 13.71 13.90-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 257 114 118 111 119 124 295 1138

22.58 10.02 10.37 9.75 10.46 10.90 25.92=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 413 85 377 875

84.63 76.58 69.94------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 46 10 94 150

9.43 9.01 17.44------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 16 68 113

5.94 14.41 12.62------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 539 1138

42.88 9.75 47.36========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

738

Page 740: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 168 395 184 159 906

70.59 87.20 69.17 67.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 47 39 45 26 157

19.75 8.61 16.92 11.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 19 37 50 129

9.66 4.19 13.91 21.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 453 266 235 1192

19.97 38.00 22.32 19.71================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 24 271 242 89 190 90 906

60.00 77.43 72.89 78.76 77.87 78.95-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 6 44 45 15 29 18 157

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

739

Page 741: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.00 12.57 13.55 13.27 11.89 15.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 35 45 9 25 6 130

25.00 10.00 13.55 7.96 10.25 5.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 350 332 113 244 114 1193

3.35 29.34 27.83 9.47 20.45 9.56===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 89 182 94 253 284 902

47.85 68.68 72.31 90.04 86.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 70 44 21 11 11 157

37.63 16.60 16.15 3.91 3.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 27 39 15 17 33 131

14.52 14.72 11.54 6.05 10.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 130 281 328 1190

15.63 22.27 10.92 23.61 27.56==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

740

Page 742: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 551 106 205 19 2 13 10 906

76.96 68.39 75.65 95.00 66.67 100.00 76.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 87 29 38 0 1 0 2 157

12.15 18.71 14.02 0.00 33.33 0.00 15.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 20 28 1 0 0 1 128

10.89 12.90 10.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 271 20 3 13 13 1191

60.12 13.01 22.75 1.68 0.25 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 477 15 128 50 190 47 907

74.07 65.22 84.77 76.92 75.10 82.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 89 6 12 5 39 5 156

13.82 26.09 7.95 7.69 15.42 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 2 11 10 24 5 130

12.11 8.70 7.28 15.38 9.49 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 151 65 253 57 1193

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

741

Page 743: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.98 1.93 12.66 5.45 21.21 4.78==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 432 475 907

77.28 74.80------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 68 89 157

12.16 14.02------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 71 130

10.55 11.18------------------------------------------------Total 559 635 1194

46.82 53.18================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 275 453 179 907

77.03 76.91 73.06

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

742

Page 744: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 45 68 41 154

12.61 11.54 16.73----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 68 25 130

10.36 11.54 10.20----------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 245 1191

29.97 49.45 20.57==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 190 281 91 91 253 906

76.31 76.99 73.98 85.05 72.49-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 31 42 22 11 51 157

12.45 11.51 17.89 10.28 14.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 42 10 5 45 130

11.24 11.51 8.13 4.67 12.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 365 123 107 349 1193

20.87 30.60 10.31 8.97 29.25=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

743

Page 745: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 141 213 376 177 907

71.57 68.27 82.10 77.97---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 28 55 47 27 157

14.21 17.63 10.26 11.89---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 44 35 23 130

14.21 14.10 7.64 10.13---------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 458 227 1194

16.50 26.13 38.36 19.01===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

744

Page 746: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47B. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of rape

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 57 100 90 280 85 146 95 853

90.48 96.15 92.78 78.21 70.25 63.48 43.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 1 3 2 37 26 53 90 212

1.59 2.88 2.06 10.34 21.49 23.04 41.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

745

Page 747: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 1 5 41 10 31 33 1267.94 0.96 5.15 11.45 8.26 13.48 15.14

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 358 121 230 218 1191

5.29 8.73 8.14 30.06 10.16 19.31 18.30====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 247 280 326 853

94.27 78.21 57.39----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 5 37 169 211

1.91 10.34 29.75----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 41 73 124

3.82 11.45 12.85----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 358 568 1188

22.05 30.13 47.81======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

746

Page 748: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 211 95 111 85 80 90 157 829

82.75 83.33 93.28 76.58 65.57 74.38 53.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 20 13 4 14 29 18 100 198

7.84 11.40 3.36 12.61 23.77 14.88 33.90-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 6 4 12 13 13 38 110

9.41 5.26 3.36 10.81 10.66 10.74 12.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 111 122 121 295 1137

22.43 10.03 10.47 9.76 10.73 10.64 25.95=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 417 85 327 829

85.28 76.58 60.89------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 38 14 147 199

7.77 12.61 27.37------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 12 63 109

6.95 10.81 11.73------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 111 537 1137

43.01 9.76 47.23========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

747

Page 749: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 161 396 155 144 856

68.22 87.22 58.27 61.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 50 34 80 47 211

21.19 7.49 30.08 20.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 24 31 44 124

10.59 5.29 11.65 18.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 236 454 266 235 1191

19.82 38.12 22.33 19.73================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 19 263 227 93 168 86 856

46.34 74.72 68.58 81.58 69.71 76.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 10 54 61 15 51 21 212

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

748

Page 750: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

24.39 15.34 18.43 13.16 21.16 18.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 35 43 6 22 6 124

29.27 9.94 12.99 5.26 9.13 5.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 114 241 113 1192

3.44 29.53 27.77 9.56 20.22 9.48===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 80 152 95 244 282 853

42.55 58.02 71.97 87.14 86.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 92 62 24 15 18 211

48.94 23.66 18.18 5.36 5.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 48 13 21 26 124

8.51 18.32 9.85 7.50 7.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 262 132 280 326 1188

15.82 22.05 11.11 23.57 27.44==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

749

Page 751: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 500 116 197 18 3 12 9 855

69.83 74.84 72.96 90.00 75.00 100.00 69.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 140 19 46 2 1 0 4 212

19.55 12.26 17.04 10.00 25.00 0.00 30.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 76 20 27 0 0 0 0 123

10.61 12.90 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 270 20 4 12 13 1190

60.17 13.03 22.69 1.68 0.34 1.01 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 438 15 120 46 191 46 856

68.01 65.22 80.00 71.88 76.10 80.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 136 3 16 9 42 4 210

21.12 13.04 10.67 14.06 16.73 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 5 14 9 18 7 123

10.87 21.74 9.33 14.06 7.17 12.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 150 64 251 57 1189

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

750

Page 752: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.16 1.93 12.62 5.38 21.11 4.79==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 417 439 856

74.60 69.24------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 89 123 212

15.92 19.40------------------------------------------------Don't know 53 72 125

9.48 11.36------------------------------------------------Total 559 634 1193

46.86 53.14================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 266 420 170 856

74.30 71.92 68.83

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

751

Page 753: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 58 96 55 209

16.20 16.44 22.27----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 68 22 124

9.50 11.64 8.91----------------------------------------------------------Total 358 584 247 1189

30.11 49.12 20.77==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 190 250 92 85 238 855

76.92 68.49 75.41 79.44 68.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 36 66 22 12 75 211

14.57 18.08 18.03 11.21 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 21 49 8 10 37 125

8.50 13.42 6.56 9.35 10.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 247 365 122 107 350 1191

20.74 30.65 10.24 8.98 29.39=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

752

Page 754: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 134 202 355 164 855

68.37 65.16 77.34 72.57---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 38 65 68 41 212

19.39 20.97 14.81 18.14---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 43 36 21 124

12.24 13.87 7.84 9.29---------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 310 459 226 1191

16.46 26.03 38.54 18.98===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

753

Page 755: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47C. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of incest

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 57 97 85 270 81 147 92 829

90.48 93.27 88.54 75.42 65.85 63.36 42.40------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 1 6 9 46 28 55 89 234

1.59 5.77 9.38 12.85 22.76 23.71 41.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

754

Page 756: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 1 2 42 14 30 36 1307.94 0.96 2.08 11.73 11.38 12.93 16.59

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 96 358 123 232 217 1193

5.28 8.72 8.05 30.01 10.31 19.45 18.19====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 239 270 320 829

91.22 75.42 55.85----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 15 46 173 234

5.73 12.85 30.19----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 42 80 130

3.05 11.73 13.96----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 358 573 1193

21.96 30.01 48.03======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

755

Page 757: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 209 88 108 81 75 88 154 803

81.64 77.88 91.53 72.32 62.50 70.97 52.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 27 16 5 20 31 20 102 221

10.55 14.16 4.24 17.86 25.83 16.13 34.46-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 9 5 11 14 16 40 115

7.81 7.96 4.24 9.82 11.67 12.90 13.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 118 112 120 124 296 1139

22.48 9.92 10.36 9.83 10.54 10.89 25.99=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 405 81 317 803

82.99 72.32 58.60------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 49 20 154 223

10.04 17.86 28.47------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 11 70 115

6.97 9.82 12.94------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 541 1141

42.77 9.82 47.41========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

756

Page 758: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 152 386 152 142 832

63.87 85.02 57.14 59.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 60 44 80 50 234

25.21 9.69 30.08 21.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 26 24 34 45 129

10.92 5.29 12.78 18.99----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 454 266 237 1195

19.92 37.99 22.26 19.83================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 20 250 225 89 164 84 832

48.78 70.82 67.77 78.76 67.21 74.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 9 64 67 20 53 21 234

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

757

Page 759: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

21.95 18.13 20.18 17.70 21.72 18.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 39 40 4 27 8 130

29.27 11.05 12.05 3.54 11.07 7.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 113 244 113 1196

3.43 29.52 27.76 9.45 20.40 9.45===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 76 140 95 239 277 827

40.64 52.83 71.97 85.05 84.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 92 76 24 24 18 234

49.20 28.68 18.18 8.54 5.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 49 13 18 32 131

10.16 18.49 9.85 6.41 9.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 132 281 327 1192

15.69 22.23 11.07 23.57 27.43==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

758

Page 760: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 492 109 188 18 3 12 9 831

68.62 70.78 69.12 85.71 75.00 100.00 69.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 147 26 54 2 1 0 4 234

20.50 16.88 19.85 9.52 25.00 0.00 30.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 19 30 1 0 0 0 128

10.88 12.34 11.03 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 272 21 4 12 13 1193

60.10 12.91 22.80 1.76 0.34 1.01 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 429 17 119 42 178 46 831

66.41 73.91 78.81 64.62 70.08 80.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 140 4 20 12 54 5 235

21.67 17.39 13.25 18.46 21.26 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 77 2 12 11 22 6 130

11.92 8.70 7.95 16.92 8.66 10.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 151 65 254 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

759

Page 761: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.01 1.92 12.63 5.43 21.24 4.77==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 397 435 832

71.02 68.29------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 104 131 235

18.60 20.57------------------------------------------------Don't know 58 71 129

10.38 11.15------------------------------------------------Total 559 637 1196

46.74 53.26================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 264 407 161 832

73.95 69.10 65.45

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

760

Page 762: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 64 106 62 232

17.93 18.00 25.20----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 76 23 128

8.12 12.90 9.35----------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 246 1192

29.95 49.41 20.64==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 182 249 91 82 227 831

72.80 67.85 74.59 76.64 65.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 45 74 21 13 81 234

18.00 20.16 17.21 12.15 23.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 44 10 12 41 130

9.20 11.99 8.20 11.21 11.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 107 349 1195

20.92 30.71 10.21 8.95 29.21=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

761

Page 763: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 117 207 350 158 832

59.09 66.56 76.09 70.22---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 56 63 73 42 234

28.28 20.26 15.87 18.67---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 41 37 25 128

12.63 13.18 8.04 11.11---------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 311 460 225 1194

16.58 26.05 38.53 18.84===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

762

Page 764: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47D. Abortion Exceptions: There is a strong chance of a serious defect in the baby

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 53 97 79 234 67 98 55 683

88.33 94.17 82.29 65.36 54.47 42.24 25.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 2 4 8 67 33 93 123 330

3.33 3.88 8.33 18.72 26.83 40.09 56.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

763

Page 765: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 2 9 57 23 41 39 1768.33 1.94 9.38 15.92 18.70 17.67 17.97

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 103 96 358 123 232 217 1189

5.05 8.66 8.07 30.11 10.34 19.51 18.25====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 229 234 220 683

87.74 65.36 38.46----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 15 67 248 330

5.75 18.72 43.36----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 57 104 178

6.51 15.92 18.18----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 358 572 1191

21.91 30.06 48.03======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

764

Page 766: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 194 79 101 62 56 63 104 659

76.08 69.30 87.07 55.36 46.28 50.40 35.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 36 21 3 33 42 33 148 316

14.12 18.42 2.59 29.46 34.71 26.40 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 14 12 17 23 29 44 164

9.80 12.28 10.34 15.18 19.01 23.20 14.86-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 116 112 121 125 296 1139

22.39 10.01 10.18 9.83 10.62 10.97 25.99=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 374 62 223 659

76.95 55.36 41.22------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 60 33 222 315

12.35 29.46 41.04------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 52 17 96 165

10.70 15.18 17.74------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 541 1139

42.67 9.83 47.50========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

765

Page 767: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 113 361 99 111 684

47.48 80.22 37.36 46.84----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 92 49 115 73 329

38.66 10.89 43.40 30.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 40 51 53 177

13.87 8.89 19.25 22.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 450 265 237 1190

20.00 37.82 22.27 19.92================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 17 210 178 66 142 72 685

40.48 59.66 53.78 57.89 58.44 63.72-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 12 81 100 34 69 35 331

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

766

Page 768: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

28.57 23.01 30.21 29.82 28.40 30.97-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 61 53 14 32 6 179

30.95 17.33 16.01 12.28 13.17 5.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 352 331 114 243 113 1195

3.51 29.46 27.70 9.54 20.33 9.46===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 44 111 74 209 247 685

23.53 42.05 56.49 74.64 75.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 119 100 35 32 40 326

63.64 37.88 26.72 11.43 12.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 53 22 39 41 179

12.83 20.08 16.79 13.93 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 131 280 328 1190

15.71 22.18 11.01 23.53 27.56==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

767

Page 769: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 402 93 153 15 3 11 8 685

56.22 60.39 56.04 71.43 75.00 84.62 61.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 216 29 74 4 1 0 5 329

30.21 18.83 27.11 19.05 25.00 0.00 38.46-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 97 32 46 2 0 2 0 179

13.57 20.78 16.85 9.52 0.00 15.38 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 154 273 21 4 13 13 1193

59.93 12.91 22.88 1.76 0.34 1.09 1.09===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 342 12 99 41 150 42 686

52.94 52.17 65.56 64.06 59.76 72.41----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 205 9 35 8 62 10 329

31.73 39.13 23.18 12.50 24.70 17.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 99 2 17 15 39 6 178

15.33 8.70 11.26 23.44 15.54 10.34----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 151 64 251 58 1193

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

768

Page 770: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.15 1.93 12.66 5.36 21.04 4.86==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 314 370 684

56.47 58.08------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 143 187 330

25.72 29.36------------------------------------------------Don't know 99 80 179

17.81 12.56------------------------------------------------Total 556 637 1193

46.61 53.39================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 216 345 124 685

60.50 58.77 50.41

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

769

Page 771: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 89 163 75 327

24.93 27.77 30.49----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 52 79 47 178

14.57 13.46 19.11----------------------------------------------------------Total 357 587 246 1190

30.00 49.33 20.67==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 155 210 68 67 183 683

62.25 57.22 55.74 63.81 52.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 66 101 39 21 103 330

26.51 27.52 31.97 20.00 29.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 56 15 17 63 179

11.24 15.26 12.30 16.19 18.05-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 367 122 105 349 1192

20.89 30.79 10.23 8.81 29.28=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

770

Page 772: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 93 158 293 140 684

47.21 50.64 63.97 61.95---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 67 92 112 59 330

34.01 29.49 24.45 26.11---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 62 53 27 179

18.78 19.87 11.57 11.95---------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 458 226 1193

16.51 26.15 38.39 18.94===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

771

Page 773: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47E. Abortion Exceptions: The family has very low income and cannot a↵ord any more children

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 52 86 69 139 41 48 28 463

82.54 85.15 71.13 39.04 33.33 20.78 12.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 4 9 17 153 68 150 166 567

6.35 8.91 17.53 42.98 55.28 64.94 76.50------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

772

Page 774: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 7 6 11 64 14 33 23 15811.11 5.94 11.34 17.98 11.38 14.29 10.60

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 101 97 356 123 231 217 1188

5.30 8.50 8.16 29.97 10.35 19.44 18.27====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 206 139 117 462

79.23 39.04 20.45----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 30 153 385 568

11.54 42.98 67.31----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 64 70 158

9.23 17.98 12.24----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 356 572 1188

21.89 29.97 48.15======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

773

Page 775: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 158 54 89 41 32 36 43 453

62.20 48.65 74.79 36.94 26.45 29.03 14.58-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 62 39 19 53 74 67 226 540

24.41 35.14 15.97 47.75 61.16 54.03 76.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 18 11 17 15 21 26 142

13.39 16.22 9.24 15.32 12.40 16.94 8.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 119 111 121 124 295 1135

22.38 9.78 10.48 9.78 10.66 10.93 25.99=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 301 41 111 453

62.19 36.94 20.52------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 120 53 367 540

24.79 47.75 67.84------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 63 17 63 143

13.02 15.32 11.65------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 111 541 1136

42.61 9.77 47.62========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

774

Page 776: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 61 294 51 57 463

25.52 65.62 19.17 23.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 148 105 187 130 570

61.92 23.44 70.30 54.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 30 49 28 51 158

12.55 10.94 10.53 21.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 448 266 238 1191

20.07 37.62 22.33 19.98================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 13 130 123 37 97 63 463

31.71 37.04 37.16 32.74 39.92 55.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 16 175 156 65 121 37 570

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

775

Page 777: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

39.02 49.86 47.13 57.52 49.79 32.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 46 52 11 25 13 159

29.27 13.11 15.71 9.73 10.29 11.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 331 113 243 113 1192

3.44 29.45 27.77 9.48 20.39 9.48===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 22 50 41 148 201 462

11.89 18.94 31.30 53.05 61.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 151 170 64 98 82 565

81.62 64.39 48.85 35.13 25.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 44 26 33 44 159

6.49 16.67 19.85 11.83 13.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 185 264 131 279 327 1186

15.60 22.26 11.05 23.52 27.57==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

776

Page 778: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 284 57 93 13 1 8 7 463

39.61 37.50 34.32 61.90 25.00 57.14 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 356 58 136 6 3 4 7 570

49.65 38.16 50.18 28.57 75.00 28.57 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 77 37 42 2 0 2 0 160

10.74 24.34 15.50 9.52 0.00 14.29 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 152 271 21 4 14 14 1193

60.10 12.74 22.72 1.76 0.34 1.17 1.17===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 213 7 69 22 115 38 464

33.18 30.43 45.70 33.85 45.45 66.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 356 12 56 33 98 13 568

55.45 52.17 37.09 50.77 38.74 22.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 73 4 26 10 40 6 159

11.37 17.39 17.22 15.38 15.81 10.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 23 151 65 253 57 1191

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

777

Page 779: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.90 1.93 12.68 5.46 21.24 4.79==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 215 247 462

38.46 39.08------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 262 308 570

46.87 48.73------------------------------------------------Don't know 82 77 159

14.67 12.18------------------------------------------------Total 559 632 1191

46.94 53.06================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 159 228 75 462

44.92 38.91 30.49

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

778

Page 780: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 154 267 144 565

43.50 45.56 58.54----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 91 27 159

11.58 15.53 10.98----------------------------------------------------------Total 354 586 246 1186

29.85 49.41 20.74==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 96 158 46 56 107 463

38.55 43.29 38.33 51.85 30.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 124 159 59 35 193 570

49.80 43.56 49.17 32.41 55.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 48 15 17 50 159

11.65 13.15 12.50 15.74 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 365 120 108 350 1192

20.89 30.62 10.07 9.06 29.36=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

779

Page 781: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 68 122 206 67 463

34.34 39.10 44.88 29.91---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 96 140 209 125 570

48.48 44.87 45.53 55.80---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 50 44 32 160

17.17 16.03 9.59 14.29---------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 459 224 1193

16.60 26.15 38.47 18.78===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

780

Page 782: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47F. Abortion Exceptions: She is not married and does not want to marry the man

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 50 86 61 133 38 39 24 431

81.97 82.69 63.54 37.15 31.15 16.88 11.06------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 6 11 25 162 68 168 173 613

9.84 10.58 26.04 45.25 55.74 72.73 79.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

781

Page 783: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 7 10 63 16 24 20 1458.20 6.73 10.42 17.60 13.11 10.39 9.22

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 96 358 122 231 217 1189

5.13 8.75 8.07 30.11 10.26 19.43 18.25====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 197 133 101 431

75.48 37.15 17.72----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 41 162 409 612

15.71 45.25 71.75----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 63 60 146

8.81 17.60 10.53----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 358 570 1189

21.95 30.11 47.94======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

782

Page 784: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 162 46 76 42 27 29 39 421

63.53 40.35 65.52 37.50 22.31 23.39 13.18-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 61 49 29 56 85 73 234 587

23.92 42.98 25.00 50.00 70.25 58.87 79.05-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 19 11 14 9 22 23 130

12.55 16.67 9.48 12.50 7.44 17.74 7.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 116 112 121 124 296 1138

22.41 10.02 10.19 9.84 10.63 10.90 26.01=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 283 42 95 420

58.35 37.50 17.56------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 140 56 391 587

28.87 50.00 72.27------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 14 55 131

12.78 12.50 10.17------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 112 541 1138

42.62 9.84 47.54========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

783

Page 785: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 62 279 43 47 431

25.94 62.00 16.23 19.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 153 123 200 138 614

64.02 27.33 75.47 58.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 48 22 52 146

10.04 10.67 8.30 21.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 450 265 237 1191

20.07 37.78 22.25 19.90================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 12 129 106 32 91 63 433

30.00 36.65 31.93 28.57 37.14 55.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 17 181 177 71 131 38 615

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

784

Page 786: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.50 51.42 53.31 63.39 53.47 33.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 42 49 9 23 12 146

27.50 11.93 14.76 8.04 9.39 10.62-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 332 112 245 113 1194

3.35 29.48 27.81 9.38 20.52 9.46===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 21 53 37 127 193 431

11.29 20.15 28.03 45.20 59.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 155 177 74 112 93 611

83.33 67.30 56.06 39.86 28.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 33 21 42 41 147

5.38 12.55 15.91 14.95 12.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 263 132 281 327 1189

15.64 22.12 11.10 23.63 27.50==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

785

Page 787: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 260 52 92 12 0 8 7 431

36.31 33.77 33.95 57.14 0.00 57.14 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 387 65 141 7 4 4 7 615

54.05 42.21 52.03 33.33 100.00 28.57 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 69 37 38 2 0 2 0 148

9.64 24.03 14.02 9.52 0.00 14.29 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 154 271 21 4 14 14 1194

59.97 12.90 22.70 1.76 0.34 1.17 1.17===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 199 8 55 19 114 36 431

30.85 34.78 36.42 29.69 45.42 63.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 377 12 72 36 99 17 613

58.45 52.17 47.68 56.25 39.44 29.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 69 3 24 9 38 4 147

10.70 13.04 15.89 14.06 15.14 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 23 151 64 251 57 1191

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

786

Page 788: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.16 1.93 12.68 5.37 21.07 4.79==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 202 229 431

36.14 36.12------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 286 329 615

51.16 51.89------------------------------------------------Don't know 71 76 147

12.70 11.99------------------------------------------------Total 559 634 1193

46.86 53.14================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 146 220 66 432

41.01 37.48 26.72

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

787

Page 789: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 169 282 160 611

47.47 48.04 64.78----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 85 21 147

11.52 14.48 8.50----------------------------------------------------------Total 356 587 247 1190

29.92 49.33 20.76==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 91 152 42 58 89 432

36.69 41.42 34.15 53.70 25.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 130 167 69 37 213 616

52.42 45.50 56.10 34.26 61.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 27 48 12 13 47 147

10.89 13.08 9.76 12.04 13.47-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 367 123 108 349 1195

20.75 30.71 10.29 9.04 29.21=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

788

Page 790: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 66 123 179 63 431

33.67 39.55 39.00 27.88---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 100 142 239 133 614

51.02 45.66 52.07 58.85---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 30 46 41 30 147

15.31 14.79 8.93 13.27---------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 311 459 226 1192

16.44 26.09 38.51 18.96===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

789

Page 791: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47G. Abortion Exceptions: She is married and does not want any more children

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 49 89 61 136 37 33 22 427

79.03 86.41 63.54 37.99 30.08 14.35 10.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 7 10 20 162 70 171 179 619

11.29 9.71 20.83 45.25 56.91 74.35 82.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

790

Page 792: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 4 15 60 16 26 17 1449.68 3.88 15.62 16.76 13.01 11.30 7.80

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 358 123 230 218 1190

5.21 8.66 8.07 30.08 10.34 19.33 18.32====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 199 136 92 427

75.67 37.99 16.08----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 38 162 421 621

14.45 45.25 73.60----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 26 60 59 145

9.89 16.76 10.31----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 572 1193

22.05 30.01 47.95======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

791

Page 793: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 159 49 80 44 30 28 32 422

62.35 42.98 67.23 39.29 24.79 22.58 10.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 64 44 25 54 83 75 244 589

25.10 38.60 21.01 48.21 68.60 60.48 82.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 21 14 14 8 21 20 130

12.55 18.42 11.76 12.50 6.61 16.94 6.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 112 121 124 296 1141

22.35 9.99 10.43 9.82 10.60 10.87 25.94=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 288 44 90 422

59.02 39.29 16.67------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 132 54 401 587

27.05 48.21 74.26------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 68 14 49 131

13.93 12.50 9.07------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 540 1140

42.81 9.82 47.37========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

792

Page 794: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 53 283 39 52 427

22.36 62.47 14.66 21.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 164 117 202 139 622

69.20 25.83 75.94 58.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 53 25 46 144

8.44 11.70 9.40 19.41----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 453 266 237 1193

19.87 37.97 22.30 19.87================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 13 126 112 33 84 60 428

31.71 35.90 33.73 29.20 34.29 53.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 17 185 170 74 133 43 622

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

793

Page 795: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

41.46 52.71 51.20 65.49 54.29 38.05-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 40 50 6 28 10 145

26.83 11.40 15.06 5.31 11.43 8.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 332 113 245 113 1195

3.43 29.37 27.78 9.46 20.50 9.46===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 25 48 38 125 191 427

13.37 18.25 28.79 44.48 58.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 152 181 68 122 94 617

81.28 68.82 51.52 43.42 28.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 34 26 34 42 146

5.35 12.93 19.70 12.10 12.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 132 281 327 1190

15.71 22.10 11.09 23.61 27.48==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

794

Page 796: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 258 57 85 13 0 8 7 428

36.03 36.77 31.25 61.90 0.00 61.54 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 391 59 152 6 4 3 7 622

54.61 38.06 55.88 28.57 100.00 23.08 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 67 39 35 2 0 2 0 145

9.36 25.16 12.87 9.52 0.00 15.38 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 272 21 4 13 14 1195

59.92 12.97 22.76 1.76 0.33 1.09 1.17===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 199 5 57 19 116 33 429

30.85 20.83 37.50 29.23 45.85 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 380 15 69 37 101 20 622

58.91 62.50 45.39 56.92 39.92 35.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 66 4 26 9 36 4 145

10.23 16.67 17.11 13.85 14.23 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 24 152 65 253 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

795

Page 797: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.93 2.01 12.71 5.43 21.15 4.77==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 200 228 428

35.84 35.79------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 288 334 622

51.61 52.43------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 75 145

12.54 11.77------------------------------------------------Total 558 637 1195

46.69 53.31================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 140 221 66 427

39.22 37.59 26.83

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

796

Page 798: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 172 289 158 619

48.18 49.15 64.23----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 78 22 145

12.61 13.27 8.94----------------------------------------------------------Total 357 588 246 1191

29.97 49.37 20.65==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 90 153 36 61 87 427

36.00 41.69 29.51 57.01 25.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 132 157 75 39 219 622

52.80 42.78 61.48 36.45 62.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 57 11 7 42 145

11.20 15.53 9.02 6.54 12.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 107 348 1194

20.94 30.74 10.22 8.96 29.15=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

797

Page 799: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 66 119 178 65 428

33.33 38.14 38.78 28.76---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 101 146 235 140 622

51.01 46.79 51.20 61.95---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 31 47 46 21 145

15.66 15.06 10.02 9.29---------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 459 226 1195

16.57 26.11 38.41 18.91===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

798

Page 800: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q48. College Education and Success

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 21 39 50 107 34 35 44 330

33.87 37.50 52.08 29.72 27.42 15.09 20.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed 33 59 45 232 87 194 166 816

53.23 56.73 46.88 64.44 70.16 83.62 76.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

799

Page 801: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 8 6 1 21 3 3 7 4912.90 5.77 1.04 5.83 2.42 1.29 3.23

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 360 124 232 217 1195

5.19 8.70 8.03 30.13 10.38 19.41 18.16============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 111 107 114 332

42.21 29.72 19.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 137 232 446 815

52.09 64.44 77.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 21 14 50

5.70 5.83 2.44------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 574 1197

21.97 30.08 47.95========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

800

Page 802: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 97 50 39 30 18 30 52 316

38.04 44.25 32.50 26.55 14.88 24.00 17.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college 142 54 78 79 102 92 239 786

55.69 47.79 65.00 69.91 84.30 73.60 80.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 9 3 4 1 3 6 42

6.27 7.96 2.50 3.54 0.83 2.40 2.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 120 113 121 125 297 1144

22.29 9.88 10.49 9.88 10.58 10.93 25.96============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 186 30 100 316

38.04 26.55 18.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 274 79 433 786

56.03 69.91 79.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 4 10 43

5.93 3.54 1.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 113 543 1145

42.71 9.87 47.42==========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

801

Page 803: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 79 178 19 57 333

32.78 39.21 7.12 23.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world wi 156 256 246 159 817

64.73 56.39 92.13 66.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 20 2 22 50

2.49 4.41 0.75 9.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 267 238 1200

20.08 37.83 22.25 19.83============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 7 85 89 42 63 46 332

17.07 24.08 26.81 37.17 25.61 40.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without 33 245 227 69 177 67 818

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

802

Page 804: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

80.49 69.41 68.37 61.06 71.95 58.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 23 16 2 6 2 50

2.44 6.52 4.82 1.77 2.44 1.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 113 246 115 1200

3.42 29.42 27.67 9.42 20.50 9.58============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 52 72 38 81 90 333

27.66 27.07 28.79 28.83 27.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today' 131 184 90 192 215 812

69.68 69.17 68.18 68.33 65.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 10 4 8 23 50

2.66 3.76 3.03 2.85 7.01--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 132 281 328 1195

15.73 22.26 11.05 23.51 27.45============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

803

Page 805: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 171 57 99 4 0 2 0 333

23.78 36.54 36.40 18.18 0.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in 524 84 165 17 4 12 11 817

72.88 53.85 60.66 77.27 100.00 85.71 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 15 8 1 0 0 3 51

3.34 9.62 2.94 4.55 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 156 272 22 4 14 14 1201

59.87 12.99 22.65 1.83 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 167 9 52 16 80 10 334

25.73 37.50 34.44 24.62 31.37 17.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without 459 13 96 48 156 45 817

70.72 54.17 63.58 73.85 61.18 77.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 2 3 1 19 3 51

3.54 8.33 1.99 1.54 7.45 5.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 65 255 58 1202

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

804

Page 806: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.99 2.00 12.56 5.41 21.21 4.83============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 125 208 333

22.24 32.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 412 406 818

73.31 63.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 25 50

4.45 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 562 639 1201

46.79 53.21==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 113 150 66 329

31.74 25.38 26.51

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

805

Page 807: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 232 408 177 817

65.17 69.04 71.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 33 6 50

3.09 5.58 2.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 591 249 1196

29.77 49.41 20.82============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 72 108 27 32 94 333

28.69 29.35 22.13 29.91 26.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in tod 166 242 94 74 241 817

66.14 65.76 77.05 69.16 68.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 18 1 1 17 50

5.18 4.89 0.82 0.93 4.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 107 352 1200

20.92 30.67 10.17 8.92 29.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

806

Page 808: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 67 97 126 43 333

33.84 30.89 27.33 18.94-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 118 196 321 182 817

59.60 62.42 69.63 80.18-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 21 14 2 50

6.57 6.69 3.04 0.88-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 227 1200

16.50 26.17 38.42 18.92=================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

807