developing npp algorithms for the arctic
DESCRIPTION
Developing NPP algorithms for the Arctic. 1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm. Chukchi Sea. ANCOVA H 0 – means between light levels are equal. P < 0.00 , H 0 is rejected. 1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm. Chukchi Sea. 1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm. Resolute Bay. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Developing NPP algorithms for the Arctic
1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm
Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Dai
ly P
P (
mg
C m
-3 d
ay-1
)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100% 50% 30% 15% 5% 1%
Chukchi Sea
ANCOVA H0 – means between light levels are equal
SourceSum-of-
Squaresdf Mean-Square F-ratio P
LIGHT_CH 170.6 5 34.1 15.1 0.000
DAILY_PP_CH 3052.7 1 3052.7 1354.8 0.000
Error 1428.6 634 2.3
1% 5% 15% 30% 50% 100%
1% 1.000
5% 0.000 1.000
15% 0.000 0.912 1.000
30% 0.000 0.921 1.000 1.000
50% 0.000 0.780 1.000 0.999 1.000
100% 0.000 0.931 1.000 1.0000 0.99 1.000
P < 0.00 , H0 is rejected
1% 5% 15% 30% 50% 100%
1% 1.000
5% 0.000 1.000
15% 0.000 0.912 1.000
30% 0.000 0.921 1.000 1.000
50% 0.000 0.780 1.000 0.999 1.000
100% 0.000 0.931 1.000 1.0000 0.99 1.000
1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm
Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Dai
ly P
P (
mg
C m
-3 d
ay-1
)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100% 50% 30% 15% 5% 1%
Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Dai
ly P
P (
mg
C m
-3 d
ay-1
)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100% 50% 30% 15% 5% 1%
Chukchi Sea
1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm
Resolute Bay
Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
0.1 1 10 100
Dai
ly P
P (
mg
C m
-3 d
ay-1
)
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100% 50% 30% 15% 5% 1%
ANCOVA H0 – means between light levels are equal
Source Sum-of-Squares df Mean-Square F-ratio P
LIGHT_CH 1027.1 5 205.4 11.7 0.000
DAILY_PP_CH 8696.4 1 8696.4 495.6 0.000
Error 2913.1 166 17.5
P < 0.00 , H0 is rejected
1% 5% 15% 30% 50% 100%
1% 1.000
5% 0.000 1.000
15% 0.000 0.581 1.000
30% 0.000 0.322 0.998 1.000
50% 0.000 0.205 0.988 0.999 1.000
100% 0.000 0.502 1.000 1.0000 0.995 1.000
1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm
Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
0.1 1 10 100
Dai
ly P
P (
mg
C m
-3 d
ay-1
)
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100% 50% 30% 15% 5% 1%
Resolute Bay
Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
0.1 1 10 100
Dai
ly P
P (
mg
C m
-3 d
ay-1
)
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100% 50% 30% 15% 5% 1%
1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm
Barents Sea
Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
0.1 1 10 100
Dai
ly P
P (
mg
C m
-3 d
ay-1
)
1
10
100
1000
1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm
Log Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Lo
g D
aily
PP
(m
g C
m-3
da
y-1)
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Resolute BayChukchi BayBarents
Combined dataset
ANCOVA H0 – means between regions are equal
Source Sum-of-Squares df Mean-Square F-ratio P
LIGHT_CH 2.28 2 1.14 18.55 0.000
DAILY_PP_CH 136.48 1 136.48 2220.18 0.000
Error 33.93 552 0.061
P < 0.00 , H0 is rejected
Resolute Bay
Chukchi Sea Barents Sea
Resolute Bay 1.000
Chukchi Sea 0.000 1.000
Barents Sea 0.361 0.000 1.000
Log Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Lo
g D
aily
PP
(m
g C
m-3
day
-1)
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Resolute BayChukchi BayBarents
1. Empirical chlorophyll based algorithm
Combined dataset
ANCOVA
•Chl 0.8 – 32 mg m-3
•P < 0.01
Average Chlorophyll•Resolute Bay 8.1 mg m-3
•Barents Sea 4.2 mg m-3
•Chukchi Sea 1.2 mg m-3
Log PP = 1.36 + 1.0.Log Chl
1.1 Surface chlorophyll vs. Euphotic zone chlorophyll
Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Dep
th (
m)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Primary production P (mg C m-3 h-1)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Spring
2 4 6 8 10 120
20
40
60
80
1000.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
ChlorophyllProductivity
Summer
1.1 Surface chlorophyll vs. Euphotic zone PP
Surface Chlorophyll (mg m-3)
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Eu
ph
oti
c zo
ne
intr
egra
ted
p
rim
ary
pro
du
ctiv
ity
(mg
C m
-2 d
-1)
1
10
100
1000
10000
Chukchi Sea Spring 2002 & 2004
Chukchi Sea Summer 2002 & 2004Resolute Bay
Chukchi Spring r2=0.51
Chukchi Summer r2=0.01
Resolute Bay r2=0.63
1.1 Rrs vs. Euphotic zone PP
Rrs 444>490>510/555
1 10
Wat
er c
olu
mn
in
teg
rate
d
pro
du
ctiv
ity
(mg
C m
-2)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
SpringSummer
2. Model based on C:Chl ratios
Behrenfeld et al. (2005) developed a productivity model based on Chl:C ratios and chlorophyll concentrations derived from ocean color satellite observations.
1. Carbon (POC) is retrieved from backscatter2. Chlorophyll is retrieved from Rrs ratios (i.e OC4V4, OC3M or OC3Arc)
These are coupled with mixed layer light levels from surface PAR and K490 observations and growth rates estimated from the literature. The final equation is:
NPP = C . µ . Zeu . h(Io)
Where C is carbon, µ is growth rate, Zeu is the euphotic depth and h(Io) describes how changes in surface light influence the depth dependent profile of carbon fixation
2. Model based on C:Chl ratios
Chlorophyll vs Rrs n = 791
y = -3.229x + 0.4986
R2 = 0.7958
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Log Rrs (443>490>510/555)
Log
Chl
orop
hyll
(mg/
m3)
Lab00Lab97Lab96Res98Res96Res95Res94Goa97Ber96Ber95Arc00Arc02-1Arc02-2OC4v4Arc04-1Arc04-2allGreenland SeaLinear (all)
2. Model based on C:Chl ratios
Model Input
1. Carbon (POC) is retrieved from backscatter – Behrenfeld global relationship2. Chlorophyll is retrieved from Rrs ratios - OC3Arc3. Surface PAR – estimated from observations4. Mixed layer light levels – estimated from observations5. Growth rate – literature global, 0.5 – 2 divisions d-16. h(Io) taken from Behrenfeld and Falkowski (1997)
NPP = C . µ . Zeu . h(Io)
Model output
1. NPP euphotic zone integrated - g C m-2 day-1
2.1 Results
Measured euphotic zone daily productivity (g C m-2 d-1)
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Mo
del
led
eu
ph
oti
c zo
ne
dai
ly
pro
du
ctiv
ity
(g C
m-2
d-1
)
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
Chukchi Sea SpringChukchi Sea Summer
Spring r2 =0.32Slope = 2.6P > 0.05
Summer r2 =0.00Slope = 0.02P > 0.1
Measured euphotic zone daily productivity (g C m-2 d-1)
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Mo
del
led
eu
ph
oti
c zo
ne
dai
ly
pro
du
ctiv
ity
(g C
m-2
d-1
)
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
Chukchi Sea SpringChukchi Sea Summer
Spring r2 =0.32Slope = 2.6P > 0.05
Summer r2 =0.00Slope = 0.02P > 0.1
2.1 Results – adjusted model
Measured 1st optical depth daily productivity (g C m-2 d-1)
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Mo
de
lle
d 1
st o
pti
cal
de
pth
da
ily
pro
du
cti
vity
(g
C m
-2 d
-1)
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10Chukchi Sea SpringChukchi Sea Summer
Summer r2 =0.60Slope = 1.28P < 0.01
Spring r2 =0.81Slope = 0.82P < 0.01
Euphotic zone integrated 1st optical depth
Data Slope r2 P Slope r2 P
Chukchi Spring 0.36 0.61 < 0.01 0.82 0.81 < 0.01
Chukchi Summer 0.18 0.00 > 0.10 1.28 0.60 < 0.01
2.2 Sensitivity to model input
Measured euphotic zone daily
productivity (g C m-2 d-1)
0.01 0.1 1 10
Mo
del
led
eu
ph
oti
c zo
ne
dai
ly
pro
du
ctiv
ity
(g C
m-2
d-1
)
0.01
0.1
1
10
Mean Ig_0.8 Mean - 1stdev Ig_0.26 Mean + 1 stdev Ig_1.34
Sensitivity to changes in mixed layer light levels
2.2 Sensitivity to model input
Mixed layer light levels Surface PAR Growth rates
r2 Slope RMS r2 Slope r2 slope
Mean 0.75 0.36 0.76 0.75 0.36 0.75 0.49
- 1 stdev 0.75 0.22 0.69 0.75 0.29 0.75 0.33
+ 1 stdev 0.75 0.57 0.88 0.75 0.64 0.75 0.65
3.0 Comparison of both methods
Measured Surface NPP (g C m-3 d-1)
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Pre
dic
ted
Su
rfac
e N
PP
(g
C m
-3 d
-1)
Pre
dic
ted
1st
op
tica
l d
epth
NP
P (
g C
m-2
d-1
)
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Summer 2000 Summer 2000Summer 2004 Summer 2004
Chl based Behrenfeld Model
Measured 1st optical depth NPP (g C m-2 d-1)
Chl basedr20.76slope 0.6
Chl basedr20.46slope 0.62
Surface Chlorophyll - Spring
Surface Chlorophyll - Summer
Surface chlorophyll - Fall
Surface chlorophyll – Winter
Surface PP - Spring
Surface PP - Summer
Surface PP - Fall
Surface PP - Winter
Kd PAR – Spring + Summer