development of a design system for permeable interlocking
TRANSCRIPT
Development of a Design System for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement
David Hein, P. Eng.Applied Research Associates, Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada David R. Smith, Technical DirectorInterlocking Concrete Pavement Institute, Herndon, Virginia USA
Permeable PavementDesign
StructuralAnalysis
HydrologicalAnalysis
Traffic Load: ESALs,Traffic Index
Subgrade Characteristics:Mr, CBR, R-Value
Design Storm(s) Contributing AreaRunoff
Select the Limiting(Thicker) Cross-
Section for Design
Determine Surface & Base/Subbase
Thickness
Surface & Base/Subbase
Properties
StructurallyAdequate?
Determine Depth ofWater & Base/
Subbase thickness
Infiltration Rate &Volume Through
Subgrade
Outflow Rate &Volume Through
Underdrains
HydrologicallyAdequate?No Yes Yes No
Revise Thickness
Revise Thickness or
Adjust Outflow
Time StepsVehicular UsePedestrian Use
Based on 1993 AASHTO Guide – Flexible PavementsMinimum soil strength:4% soaked CBRR‐value = 9Resilient modulus = 6,200 psi (43 MPa)
• Base/subbase Layer coefficients3 1/8 in. (80 mm) thick pavers + 2 in. (50 mm) bedding = 0.34 in. (100 mm) thick ASTM No. 57 stone base = 0.09Variable thickness ASTM No. 2, 3 or 4 stone subbase = 0.06(Typical dense‐graded base ~ 0.12 – 0.14)
No frost layer required
ICPI design chart: max. 1 million 18,000 lb (80 kN) ESALs or TI=9
PICP Structural Design
AASHTO Typical ESALs by Road Class
Road Class Design ESALs Arterial or Major StreetsUrban 7,500,000Rural 3,600,000Major CollectorsUrban 2,800,000Rural 1,450,000Minor CollectorsUrban 1,250,000Rural 550,000Commercial/Multi‐Family LocalsUrban 425,000Rural 275,000
ICPI PICP Developments4th Edition PICP Manual100+ pages60+ figuresIndustry consensus• Hydrologic Design• Structural design
Up to 1 million lifetime ESALs or Caltrans TI = 9
Follows Permeable Design Prosoftware
• Guide specs• Construction guidelines
Promotes using contractors with ICPI PICP course certificate
• Maintenance guidelines
ConclusionsStructural Design• PICP, PA and PC use empirical structural design methods• PICP – accounts for truck traffic loads and soil strengths, provides
base/subbase thicknesses• AASHTO ‘93 method reasonable for PICP• Open‐graded subbase/base – more research needed in saturated
base & soil conditions • Testing needed using PA & PC bases for higher ESAL facilities• Expand use of permeable pavements
Green infrastructure/retrofit