development of a tpc for the future linear collider on behalf of the lc tpc groups aachen, berkeley,...
TRANSCRIPT
Development of a TPCfor the Future Linear Collider
on behalf of the LC TPC groups
Aachen, Berkeley, Carleton, Cracow, DESY, Hamburg, Karlsruhe, MIT, Montreal, MPI Munich, NIKHEF, Novosibirsk, Orsay, St.Petersburg, Rostock,
Saclay, Victoria
Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen
Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics 17 – 23 July 2003 Aachen
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
22
Outline:
1. The e+ e- Linear Collider Project
2. Design of the Time Projection Chamber
3. Micropattern Readout of the TPC
4. Ongoing R&D efforts
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
33
TESLA-Project (DESY):
Acceleration gradient
35 MV/m s = 800 GeV
Superconductive cavities with improved manufacturing (electropolishing)
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
44
Detector for the Linear Collider
Why new & improved e+ e– detector?
• Higher particle energies from GeV to TeV• More complex final states e+ e– ZHH 6 jets/leptons e+ e– H+H– tb tb 8 jets• Resolution e+ e– ZH e+ e– (+ – ) + X SUSY (missing energy)• Accelerator background, luminosity, bunch separation
...we want to build the best apparatus...
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
55
Precise measurement of charged particle momenta:
• Study of Higgs production independent of Higgs decay lepton momenta
• ideally: recoil mass resolution
only limited by Z width
Momentum resolution
(1/pt ) < 5 × 10-5 GeV -1 (full tracker)
Tracker: Momentum Resolution
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
66
Large Silicon-Tracker à la LHC experiments?• much lower particle rates at linear collider• keep material budget low
Large TPC • 1.7 m radius• 3% X0 barrel 30% X0 endcap• 4 T magnetic field
Goals• 200 points (3-dim.) per track• 100 µm single point resolution• dE/dx 5% resolution
10 times better performance than at LEP
A Time Projection Chamber for the LC
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
77
New concept for gas amplification at the end flanges:
Replace proportional wires with Micro Pattern Gas Detectors
GEM or Micromegas:
•Smaller structures
•Two-dimensional symmetry
(no E×B effects)
•Only fast electron signal
•Intrinsic ion feedback suppression
Wires
GEM
Gas Amplification System
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
88
Gas Electron Multiplier - GEM (F. Sauli 1996)140 m Ø 75 m
•50 µm kapton foil, double sided copper coated
•75 µm holes, 140 µm pitch
•GEM voltages up to 500 V yield 104 gas amplification
Use GEM towers for safe operation (COMPASS)
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
99
Micromegas (Y. Giomataris 1995)
•asymmetric parallel plate chamber with micromesh
•saturation of Townsend coefficient mild dependence of amplification on gap variations
•ion feedback suppression
50 m pitch
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1010
Studies on drift gas
Understand the charge transfer and gain of micropattern detectors in strong magnetic field
Demonstrate feasibility with large prototype in test beam
Obtain optimal position resolution
Study dE/dx resolution
Get in touch with industry for large scale production and detector manufacturing (GEMs, Micromegas, thin frames, grids, field cage)
Goals of the R&D Project
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1111
Gas Studies
Traditional TPC gas P10: Ar/CH4 (90/10) might be problematic because of expected high neutron background at linear collider
Other possible quenchers are CO2 and CF4
CF4:
>20 -> potential transverse diffusion less than 200 m at 1m
attachment is small below 400 V/cm
» TDR-Gas « : Ar/CH4/CO2 (93/5/2)
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1212
Magnetic Field
Langevin equation:
Aleph: B = 1.5 T 9 Tesla: B = 4 T 24
Impact on electron collection ?
cyclotron frequencymean free time
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1313
DESY:
5 T superconducting magnet28 cm bore diameterTotal length 187 cm
Saclay:
2 T superconducting magnet53 cm bore diameterTotal length 150 cm
Test Magnets
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1414
Orsay-Saclay: no change observed in the iron 55 peak position beween 0 and 2T
Electron Transparency in Magnetic Field
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1515
Charge Transfer Measurements in Magnetic Field
- Anode current rises with magnetic field
- Effect can be explained with improved extraction efficiency
- Triple GEM structure with current readout
- Put into superconducting magnet at
DESY
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1616
Ion Feedback in Magnetic Field
GEM:
Ion feedback improves with magnetic field
Micromegas:
No dependence of ion feedback on the magnetic field
Finer mesh (1000 lpi) should allow reaching the optimal feedback
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1717
- Simulation of electric fieldmap using MAXWELL
- Input fieldmap into GARFIELD
- Monte Carlo simulation of electron drift paths
Simulation of Charge Transfer in GEM Structures
- Calculation of transfer coefficients (like extraction efficiency)
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1818
Measured resolution: 124 µm
TPC Cosmic Tests
Karlsruhe: • GEM TPC• STAR readout electronics
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
1919
TPC Cosmic Tests Berkeley, Orsay, Saclay: • Micromegas TPC• STAR readout electronics• Magnetic field run end of year
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
2020
Carleton, Montreal, Victoria: • Prototype TPC with GEM tower• STAR readout electronics• Cosmics test stand in 1 T magnet (TRIUMF)
Gas: P10
B = 0 T, = 2.3 mm B = 0.45 T, = 1.2 mm B = 0.9 T, = 0.8 mm
Cosmic Tests with 1 T Magnet
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
2121
3cm 30 cm
TDR spec.
goal
B = 0
B = 0.45 T
B = 0.9 T
Track Resolution
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
2222
Readout Structure
Disadvantage of electron signal:• No broadening by induction• Signal collected on one pad• No centre-of-gravity
Possible Solutions:
• Charge spread within GEM structure• Capacitive or resistive coupling of adjacent pads• Alternative pad geometries• Smaller pads ( Replace pads by pixel readout chips)
chevronsstrip coupling
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
2323
Carleton/Orsay/Saclay: • Resistive film on readout board • Micromesh on frame
Charge Dispersion Pulses in a Resistive Anode
Resistive foil signal
Charge dispersion signal
Charge dispersion signal
Direct signal on centre strip
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
2424
Cathode foil
base plate
MediPix 2
Drift Space
GEM foils
Silicon readout
NIKHEF: • Use MediPix 2 pixel detector (Jan Visschers et al.)• Remove sensor chip• Use readout chip to detect signal of GEM tower
Stefan Roth, Development of a TPC for the future Linear Collider - HEP 2003 Aachen
2525
Summary ↔ Outlook
• Measurements in high B-field have started, with encouraging results for the charge-transfer coefficients for GEM and Micromegas
• Better understanding of amplification and resolution achieved
• Test-stand infrastructure now functioning
• Resolution in high B-fields must be measured for all technologies, GEM, Micromegas and wires
• Design and operation of large prototypes should follow promptly, including test beam
• Mechanics and field cage design should start now