development of an instrumentation suite to measure helmet ... workshops/21st transducer...•...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Development of an Instrumentation Suite to Measure Helmet Windblast
and Impact Loading23 June 2004
John PlagaHuman Effectiveness Directorate
Air Force Research LaboratoryDoug CoppessGlenn Thomas
Greg ThompsonGeneral Dynamics
2
Background
• Windblast forces during ejection impart potentially injurious head and neck loads
• Integrated Chin/Nape Straps (ICNS) have been recently installed on USAF helmets to increase stability
• Ejections have shown potential for head/headrest impacts
• Expanded crewmember range may result in lower tolerances to injuries
2
3
Problem
• Traditional ejection test manikins have limited head sensors– Upper neck forces/moments– Triaxial accelerometer– Possibly angular (pitch) accelerometer
• Difficult to determine what exactly is contributing to the neck loading
4
Application
• Newton’s Second LawF = maΣF = maF1 + F2 + F3 + Fn = ma
• Forces include– Inertial– Aerodynamic– Reaction e.g. headrest force/impact– Neck reaction force
∑ = amF vv∑ =Γ αv
vI
3
5
Objectives
• Determine loads acting from helmet into head
– Helmet lift loads
– Chin strap tension
– Aft headrest impact
• Correlate a measurable force with neck tension as helmet is being lifted from head
• Determine if headrest impacts are injurious
6
Approach
• Measure neck loads
– Upper and lower neck forces and moments
• Measure head accelerations
– CG, Earplugs, angular pitch
• Measure other loading
– Aerodynamic
– Helmet static pressure
– Reaction (impact, e.g. headrest)
• Determine aerodynamic loading
4
7
Chin Strap Load Cell
• Small and light weight– 15 grams– Minimize inducing loads– Titanium alloy
• Shaped for minimized friction– Filleted or cylindrical edges– Free rolling center shaft
• Two pairs of strain gages– Full bridge– Greater output
• Small, durable wiring– Channels/pockets
8
Chin Strap Load Cell
5
9
Chin Strap Load Cell Loading
10
Chin Strap Calibration
Chin Strap SN#6 (5-06-2004)
0
5
10
15
0 50 100 150 200 250
Pounds
Mv'
s
6
11
Skull Cap Load Cell
12
Skull Cap Load Cell
• CRABI Load Cell, Denton 2254 (FTSS-IF-954)
• Rotated so that Fx load is lift load and Fz is horizontal compression load
• Capacity
– Fx & Fy – 200 lbs
– Fz – 500 lbs
– Mx & My – 500 in-lb
– Mz – 300 in-lb
7
13
Skull Cap Load Cell
14
Modified Head
• Existing cap – 1.56 lbs
• Modified head
– New Cap – 0.63 lbs
– Load cell – 0.31 lbs
– Adapter Plate – 0.50 lbs
• Head ballasted to match 95th percentile head weight and CG
– 10.49 lbs (10.55” target)
– CGx = 0.25” (met target)
– CGx = 1.79” (1.77” target)
8
15
Testing Using Instrumentation
• Actuator is an MTS hydraulic system that pulls the head downward out of helmet • Load cells in manikin neck (internal) and top of bracket (not shown)
• Loading rate of approximately 33,400 N/s (7,500 lb/s)
• Test ends when MTS load reaches 4500 N (1,000 lbs) or strap failure
16
ICNS Dynamic Test
• Test terminated @ 4500 N
• 3 Test Configurations:
• No Mask
• MBU-12/P Mask
• MBU-20/P Mask
9
17
MTS Test Data
0 100 200 300 400 500Time (msec)
0100200300400500600700800900
1000Fo
rce
(lbs)
INT NECK Z FORCE (LB)INT SKULLCAP Z FORCE (LB)RIGHT CHIN STRAP FORCE (LB)
18
MTS Test Data
0 100 200 300 400 500Time (msec)
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Forc
e (lb
s) o
r Tor
que
(in-lb
s) INT SKULLCAP X FORCE (LB)INT SKULLCAP Y FORCE (LB)INT SKULLCAP Z FORCE (LB)INT SKULLCAP Mx TORQUE (IN-LB)INT SKULLCAP My TORQUE (IN-LB)INT SKULLCAP Mz TORQUE (IN-LB)
10
19
Results
Helmet Pull Tests
0.10 0.09
0.17
0.09
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
SeparateChin/Nape, no
mask
ICNS, no mask ICNS, MBU-12/P ICNS, MBU-20/P
Configuration
Chi
n St
rap/
Nec
k Z
Average peak neck tensile load
Linear relationship between neck loadand chin strap load
Chin FzLbs Lbs
SCNS, no mask 99 602ICNS, no mask 76 817ICNS, MBU-12/P 72 743ICNS, MBU-20/P 74 832
20
Results
Average peak neck tensile load
Linear relationship between neck loadand chin strap load
Helmet Pull Tests
0.320.300.35
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
ICNS, no mask ICNS, MBU-12/P ICNS, MBU-20/PConfiguration
Skul
l Cap
FZ/
Nec
k Z
Neck Fz Skull FzLbs Lbs
ICNS, no mask 817 285ICNS, MBU-12/P 743 226ICNS, MBU-20/P 832 267
11
21
Comparison with Rocket Sled Ejection Test Data (ICNS)
Rocket Sled Ejection Tests
0.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.35
430
445
470
515
595
599
600
Averag
e
Velocity (KEAS)
Chi
n S
trap/
Nec
k Z
0.24
100
130
390200
350470 360 286
Peak neck tensile forces (lbs)
22
Ejection Test Differences
• Chin strap/neck tensile force
– MTS: 0.10
– Ejection: 0.24
• Not pure axial loading
• Aerodynamics
– Stagnation pressure
– Force on strap/load cell
12
23
Head/Neck Sensors for Follow-up Rocket Sled Testing
HEAD ANGULARACCELEROMETER
0/0 Ejection Seat Test
13
25
0/0 Ejection Seat Test
8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4-200-150-100
-500
50100150200250300350
Skull Cap FXSkull Cap FYSkull Cap FZ
8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4-2500
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Neck Force XNeck Force YNeck Force Z
26
Other Uses – Skull Cap
• Measure impacts to the back of the head• Commercial and industrial helmet systems
– Motorsports– Motorcycle– Bicycle– Hardhats
• Evaluation of the crashworthiness of vehicles– Rearward impacts– Rollover
• Falls from objects such as ladders• The data can be used to assess the probability of
injury
14
27
Results - Skull Cap Load Cell
• Testing "altered" the sensor
– Five of the six channels were out of zero spec.
– The metal wasn't located in the same geometry it was located when the gauges were initially applied
– Recommend at least a three-fold increase in range
28
Results – Chin Strap Load Cell
• Effective in helmet pull and ejection seat tests
• Intermittent dropouts during windblast tests
– Enamelized wires likely contacting conductive surface
• Newest sensors use Teflon® insulation
• Use of “pockets” around stain gages
– Better protection of strain gages
– Possibly better concentrate strain
15
29
Conclusions
• Both the skull cap load cell and chin strap load cell have been used in several test programs
• A few problems occurred that can be corrected in the future
– Higher range skull cap load cell
– Teflon® insulated wires on chin strap load cell
– “Pockets” cut in chin strap load cell
• Use of this instrumentation suite can yield valuable data in the area of reducing neck injuries during ejection
– Can also be useful for other commercial applications