dfafas

Upload: dimman001

Post on 02-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 dfafas

    1/8

    9/10/12

    1

    M A T T H E W G R I E R S O N , M D

    D E P A R T M E N T O F R E H A B I L I T A T I O NM E D I C I N E

    U N I V E R S I T Y O F W A S H I N G T O N

    S E P T E M B E R 1 0 , 2 0 1 2

    Physiatric Approach to Treating

    Chronic Low Back Pain

    Epidemiology of Spine Care

    LBP affects up to 80% of population at some point

    1-2% of US population is disabled by LBP Estimated total cost for spine care: 2006: $85 billion

    Annual incidence 5-10% in the US No consistent ways to predict the success of any

    given treatment of LBP

    Natural History: 1/3 resolve completely within 1 year

    3/5 on-going relapsing pattern

    1/10 never resolve

    Deyo, 2001; Anderson 1997; Kent 2005

    % of US Population with LBP

    National Center for Health Statistics

    Increases in Injections for Medicare Patients

    Friendly, Deyo 2007

    4-fold increase

    Differential Diagnosis LBP Demographic Considerations

    Pediatric Slipped capital femoral epiphysis orother hip disorders

    Adolescent Spondylolysis College Disc injury resulting in radiculopathy or

    annular tear; spondylolysis; nonspecific muscle painAdult Nonspecific lumbar pain, disc injury, some

    facet pain, lumbar stenosis, degenerative disease

    Senior Compression fractures, degenerativedisease with stenosis (causing radicular pain), facetarthropathy (causing axial pain)

  • 7/27/2019 dfafas

    2/8

    9/10/12

    2

    Pain generators: Lumbar disc (Annular Tear, Discitis)

    Nerve Root (Lumbar Radiculopathy,

    Lumbar Stenosis) Facet Z-joint (Facet arthropathy,

    spondylosis)

    Vertebral Body (Compression Fracture)

    Muscles/Ligaments (Lumbar Strain)

    Spinal Cord (Cauda Equina vs. ConusMedullaris)

    Referred from SI Joint / Hips

    Intervertebral Disc 5-39% Zygapophysial Joint 15-40% Sacroiliac Joint 6-13%

    Lumbar Vertebrae 3 parts Vertebral Body

    Weight bearing functionSome longitudinal forces transmittedNot Solid

    Pedicles

    Connect posterior element and bodyTransmit tensionCylinder with thick walls

    Posterior Elements

    Laminae, articular processes, spinousprocesses, transverse processes

    Site of muscle attachmentsResist forward sliding, twisting

    Functional Anatomy: HNP - Axial

    Lateral Recess Central Disc

    Functional Anatomy: L-Spine HNP

    Herniated Disc at L5/S1? Paracentral?

    Lateral Recess?

    Which nerve roots wouldbe involved?

    Where would thesymptoms be?

    History

    Time Course, Chronicity Location, Quality, DurationAggravating, Alleviating Factors Treatment Sought to Date Social History Red FlagsYellow Flags

    Red Flags? (for serious medical illness)

    Age > 70 Unexplained weight loss History of malignancy Nocturnal Pain

    Fever IV Drug abuse Prolonged steroid use Bowel/Bladder Dysfunction Focal / Progressive Neurologic Changes Trauma

  • 7/27/2019 dfafas

    3/8

    9/10/12

    3

    Yellow Flags? (for risk of disability)

    Depression / Mood issues

    Psychiatric Illness Social issues / Poor support network Poor coping skillsWork-related issues Sleep disturbance Fear of movement (kinesiophobia) Deconditioning Family history of disability / chronic pain

    Physical Exam

    Inspection (shirt off or in gown): Body habitus

    Posture (head position, shoulders) plumb line from ear lobe,to shoulder tip, to peak of iliac crest.

    Look for scoliosis

    Look for iliac crest symmetry

    Lumbar shift away or toward nerve injury

    Hyperlordosis

    Physical Exam

    Palpation STANDING

    Iliac crests for symmetrySpinous processes (looking for step off)

    PRONE

    Spinous processesParaspinalsGreater trochanterIschial tuberositySegmental Motion

    Physical Exam

    ROM: Flexion, extension, lateral bending, rotation, coupled motions

    (e.g. rotation and extension)

    Note side-to-side differences

    More of a gestalt

    Normal: Flexion: 60, Extension: 20, Lateral Flexion: 30, Rotation:30

    Schober Test:

    Mark Dimples of Venus (S1), 5cm below, 10cm aboveShould increase 4-5 cm with flexionSpecific, but not sensitive

    Melanga 2006

    Physical Exam

    Neurologic: MMT:

    HF, HE, HAb, HAdKF, KEADF, APF Functional testing includes 10 toe raises, heel walks!GTE, Inv, Ev

    Reflexes:

    L4L5S1

    Sensation: What are the dermatomes? Peripheral nerves?

    How does exam narrow your DDx?

    Facet Loading: Extension with rotation and axial compression

    Radiculopathy with HNP Central herniation, often worse with flexion

    Lateral recess herniation, often worse with extension

    > 90% occur at L4-5 or L5-S1

    Sclerotomal Pearls: PSIS Pain: Think L5/S1 (or SI joint) as source

    Greater Trochanter: Think L5

    Ischial Tuberosity: Think S1

  • 7/27/2019 dfafas

    4/8

    9/10/12

    4

    Physical Exam

    Provocative Maneuvers SLR

    Positive if 30-70 degrees, with pain below the kneeCan test seated (e.g., Slump) or supineMore sensitive than specificProvocation with head flexion, or ankle dorsiflexion

    Femoral stretch test

    Prone, place your hand in popliteal fossa, exert some pressure withthat hand while flexing the knee, and can also extend a little at thehip. Pain should be reproduced in anterior thigh or back.

    Tests a high lumbar disc herniation

    Femoral Stretch Test Adding Hip Extension

    Upper Lumbar Radiculopathy

    Slump Test Dural Tension Sign

    and relief of pain with neck extension+ if provokes radicular pain

    SI-Joint / Hip

    Hip: FABER / FADIR

    SI Joint (tests are not specific): Rare for pain above buttocks

    Compression / Distraction Test

    Gaenslens Test let leg drop off table while you stabilize thepelvis (supine)

    Stork

    Knee: Genu valgus, varusAnkle: Pes cavus, planus

    Gaenslens Test

    Lie patient supine.

    Stabilize pelvis withdownward pressure oncontralateral ASIS.

    Let ipsilateral leg dropoff side of examinationtable.

    Apply downward force at

    ipsilateral thigh andcontralateral ASIS

    Positive with pain in theSI joint region (buttock,low back)

    None of the SI

    provocative maneuversare particularly specific.

    Waddell Signs

    Consider contribution from Non-Organic Causes: Distraction: Findings are only present on formal exam

    Over-Reaction: disproportionate verbalization, facialexpressions, muscle tension/tremor, collapsing, sweating

    Regional disturbance: Non-dermatomal, non-myotomal

    Simulation tests: Pain with perception of testing

    Tenderness: Not localized to anatomic structure

  • 7/27/2019 dfafas

    5/8

    9/10/12

    5

    How do you find the source of the pain?

    Most physical examination and imaging findings lacksensitivity and specificity.

    Degenerative changes on XR / MRI do not reliablypredict pain or disability.

    Interventionalists can use dual blocks at presumedpain generator, but that offers little to the PCP

    Jensen 1994

    Imaging?

    When to order an imaging study? Will it change management?

    Will it alleviate anxiety in the patient (and thus help themcomply with treatment?

    ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Natural course ofuncomplicated acute LBP and/or radiculopathy is abenign, self-limited condition that does not warrantany imaging studies.

    Imaging is considered if no improvement within 6weeks, and for those with red flags.

    Interventions

    Physical Therapy Medication Functional restorationAcupuncture Chiropractor Epidural Steroid Injections Facet Injections Dorsal Rhizotomy Spinal Stimulator Surgery

    Treatment Approaches

    Acute (< 6 weeks) Subacute (6 weeks to 3 months) Chronic (> 3 months) Interventional Movement-Based Interdisciplinary

    CONSERVATIVE1. Relative rest /

    Activity Mod2. Meds3. PTMid-Range

    1. ESIAggressive1. Surgery

    Medications

    Anti-inflammatories Includes course of oral corticosteroids

    NSAIDs

    Opioids analgesics

    Neuromodulaing Agents Anticonvulsants Gabapentin

    Antidepressants TCA, SNRI

    Antispasmodics (relax the patient and the provider) Cyclobenzaprine

    Tizanidine

    Physical Therapy

    Goal of centralization of radicular pain Segmental mobilization (vertebrae, SI joint) Lumbar stabilization Core strength Pelvic floor stabilization Other considerations Posture Assessment, ErgonomicsAre there biomechanical deficits to be addressed? Pelvic girdle weakness Joint contractures (HF, HAb) that place undo stress at painful joints Corrective Orthotics (AFO, FO)

  • 7/27/2019 dfafas

    6/8

    9/10/12

    6

    Interventional Approaches - ESI

    Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI) Most effective at treating radicular symptoms.

    Dramatic increase in use in Medicare population between 1994and 2001. (Less than half were performed for radicularsymptoms.)

    Caudal, Transforaminal (most specific, delivery atthe site of pathology), Interlaminar

    Must consider risks/benefits as any other procedure,including comprehensive history (risk for diabeticcomplications, Cushings)

    Interventional Approaches Facet

    Steroid (max 2-3 / year)

    Anesthetic blocks (immediate, can be diagnostic) Dual blocks: short relief with a short-acting

    anesthetic, and long relief with a long-actinganesthetic

    Using this method, facet-mediated pain approachesprevalence of 30% in older patients (Bogduk 2008)

    Scant medical literature to support steroid injections

    Interventional Approaches Facet

    Facets are innervated by the medial branches of thedorsal rami of the lumbar nerve roots.

    Can consider radiofrequency ablation (neurotomy) ofthose nerve roots, sometimes called dorsalrhizotomy (not to be confused with the very differentprocedure performed in pediatrics)

    8-12 months of relief Before you kill the nerves, important to have good

    response (>90% relief of pain) from the selective nerveblocks.

    Long term consequences of denervation are unknown (?segmental spine stabilization)

    Chronic LBP

    Traditional biomedical approach has beeninadequate.

    Adoption of biopsychosocial model recognizing theinfluences of cognitive, emotional, behavioral, andsocial/environmental factors, as well as biomedicalones.

    Research on chronic LBP has suggested thatpsychosocial factors are as least as important asbiomedical ones in predicting pain course.

    Carragee 2005,Boos 2000

    Fear-Avoidance

    Individuals who believe that physical or workactivities should be avoided when in pain (or thatsuch activity is dangerous), have greater likelihood ofdeveloping LBP.

    Avoidance leads to disuse, deconditioning, and pain-related disability.

    Goal: appearance of pain is met with cognitiveappraisal of meaning and significance. Work to

    appraise as a benign experience (such as frommuscle soreness or minor strain)

    Linton 1999, Disord 2009

    Pain Catastrophizing

    exaggerated and dysfunctional negative appraisal ofpain as a threat

    Leads to fear-avoidance, hypervigilance (which canresult in increased brain activity in pain sensitive

    regions).Avoidance behaviors: limping, guarding, bracing,

    reliance on passive techniques and modalities

    Overtime these types of behaviors can become highlyresistant, and are reinforced by family, work,medical community, financial compensation

  • 7/27/2019 dfafas

    7/8

    9/10/12

    7

    How Do Physicians Reinforce Pain?

    Ordering unnecessary tests

    Referring for another opinion Reinforces the belief that something may have been missed

    Being uncertain while reassuring a patient I dont think it is necessary to get a surgical opinion; it is very

    unlikely that you have anything wrong that would requiresurgery

    Telling patients to take it easy or listen to yourbody might reinforce thoughts that it is dangerousto be physically active or that pain is a sign of injury.

    Depression

    cLBP brings about a number of lifestyle changes thatcan worsen depression: occupational disability,financial stress, sleep disruption, negative healthconsequences, relationship distress, sexualdysfunction, family role changes, limitations insocial, recreational or household activities

    Initial diagnosis can be missed Treatment may be inadequate Taking medications may lead the patient to not

    accept responsibility for resolving their depression(such as through CBT).

    Psychosocial Treatment

    CBT identify and challenge dysfunctional painresponses

    Exposure therapy confronting fears Education encourage as many normal activities as

    the patient can tolerate

    Interdisciplinary Pain Rehab

    5 days a week each week for 4 weeks, with outpatientf/up visits

    MD, RN, PT, OT, Voc Rehab, Pain Psychologist Treatment designed to reduce avoidance patterns,

    improve strength and body biomechanics

    Some reviews suggest that for non-radicular backpain, interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation probably

    has better or at least equal outcomes to moreinvasive interventions (surgery or procedures)

    Turk 2002, 2005

    Work-place

    Predictors of future LBP Low job satisfaction

    Perceived lack of social support from co-workers or asupervisor

    Limited control at work

    Excessive workload

    Papageorgiou 1997, Eriksen 2004

    Case

  • 7/27/2019 dfafas

    8/8

    9/10/12

    8

    Case: Non-Cancer Pain - Opioids

    55 y/o M axial LBP.

    Denies radiation into legs. No bowel/bladder sx. Pain all the time Self-employed truck driver, light loading/unloading Divorced father, 2 adult childrenAble to work with minimal discomfort when taking

    OxyContin 80mg BID

    PE: Diffuse P/S tenderness, gluteal muscles Negative hip, SI joint signs

    511, 230 lbs

    Case: Non-Cancer Pain - Opioids

    MRI mild DJD, no nerve root compression

    Attempted PT, NSAIDs, muscle relaxants No sustained relief.

    H/o bilateral facet injections (L4/5 L5/S1) No improvement

    What to do?

    Rehab Approach

    Fully investigate attempts at prior therapy ? Modalities, vs. therapeutic exercise, stretching, functional

    retraining, ergonomics

    What other non-pharm approaches Yoga, massage, acupuncture, CBT, spinal manipulation

    Other meds: Anti-depressants?

    Other NSAIDs, Tylenol, other muscle relaxants, AED, TCA

    Risk of diversion. Have risks/benefits of chronicopioid use been discussed?

    Rehab Approach

    Chronic Opioids for Non-Cancer Pain Moderate to severe pain

    Pain causes an adverse functional impact or QOL

    Benefits outweigh the harms

    Ongoing monitoring, reassessment with appropriate labsIf h/o red flags, may need to seek support from addiction

    treatment specialists.

    S/E: Sedation, dizziness, N/V, constipation, physical dependence,tolerance, respiratory depression, sex hormone deficiencies

    Follow-up

    Is pain improved (documented)?How is function measured on follow-up?

    Other Rehab Approach?

    At age 55, patient will require 30 more years ofOxyContin, with titration as appropriate

    Difficulty finding providers to prescribeAdverse Effects: cognitive difficulties, apathy,

    depression, fatigue, worse with age.

    Issue of diversion.What about a more comprehensive approach

    (including weight loss, PT, CBT, etc.)?

    Multidisciplinary programs not always covered byinsurance.

    Other Rehab Approach?

    Generally, better to involve Physiatrist BEFORE thepoint of OxyContin 80mg PO BID.

    Could consider contract with downward titrationwith clear expectations for monitoring.

    What do you do when the benefits vs. harm areunpredictable and you have a busy practice,especially when someone is still working (which isunusual in a situation like this)