diamond sensor diamond sensor for particle detection maria hempel beam impact meeting geneva,...
TRANSCRIPT
Diamond Sensor Diamond Sensor for Particle Detection
Maria HempelBeam Impact MeetingGeneva, 29.8.2014
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 2
Table of Content
> Single Crystal and Polycrystalline Diamond Sensors
>Characterization Setups
> Polarisation
> Application of Diamond Sensors
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 3
Single Crystal and Polycrystalline Diamond Sensors
> Properties
> Signal Generation
>Diamond Materials
>Differences of Diamond Materials
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 4
Diamond Properties
Diamond Advantages:
> Low leakage current (pA)
>No temperature dependence
>Radiation hardness
>Nanosecond time resolution
Diamond Silicon
Band Width (300K) 5.47eV 1.12eV
Electron mobility 2800 cm2.V-1.s-1 1600 cm2.V-1.s-1
e/h pairs for one MIP 36 110
size 5x5mm² (sCVD) or wafer/ 1x1 cm² (pCVD)
wafer
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 5
Signal Generatiion
>Diamond are operated as solid state ionization chamber
> Ionization of atoms by MIP particles 36 e/h pairs/μm
Usual thickness of diamond: ~300μm or ~500μm
>Metallization of diamond surface Tungsten/Titanium
CMS diamonds
Chromium/Gold
BCM1F4LHC diamonds
> Separation of e/h pairs due to bias voltage Number of separated e/h depends on bias voltage
Above certain bias voltage maximum number of separated e/h is reached
Different for each diamond
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 6
Diamond Materials
>Diamond is grown by chemical vapor deposition CMS used diamonds are from E6 (sCVD and pCVD) and II-VI (pCVD)
Usage of seed crystal in a cloud of plasmatic methane gas heated by microwave energy carbon atoms attach on seed crystal with diamond configuration
> Single crystal diamond: grown on High Temperature High Pressure Diamond
5x5mm² size
> Polycrystalline diamond grown on diamond powder attached on
silicon
Wafer size
Cross section through pCVD diamond grainboundaries occur during growing process
Thesis S. Müller
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 7
Differences of Diamond Materials
>Higher initial signal for sCVD than for pCVD
> Fast signal decrease for sCVD
> Slow signal decrease for pCVD
sCVD pCVD
Single MIP counting (CMS) Current monitoring (CMS)
Used for spectroscopy (high energy resolution) Not used for spectroscopy
Higher initial signal 10 times less initial signal
Fast signal decrease with irradiation Slow signal decrease with irradiation
Single crystal structure allows better understanding of physics (charge carrier transport, radiation damage)
Polycrystalline structure makes simulation more complicated
“Radiation damage in diamond detectors for beam monitoring at CMS”(M. Guthoff)
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 8
Diamond Characetrization
> Every diamond is different in electrical properties
>Choosing the best diamond sensors for later operation
>Characterization measurements: Optical inspection
Leakage current as a function of bias voltage
Signal stability as a function of time
Charge collection efficiency (CCE) as a function of bias voltage
CCE as function of time for irradiated diamonds
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 9
Optical Inspection
>Using a laser microscope
> Extracted information: Diamond size
Metallization size
thickness
non.-metallized diamondTransparent measurement Thickness calculation
Metallized diamond with two padsInspection of gaps between pads
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 10
Leakage Current as a Function of Bias Voltage
>Diamond inside frame
> Bonding of diamond
> Installing frame in a shielding box
> Shielding box is filled with nitrogen
>Measuring leakage current as function of HV
-1kV to +1KV
> Leakage currents has to be in the order of pA
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 11
Leakage Current as a Function of Bias Voltage
sCVD- selected for installation
sCVD- not selected for installation
pCVD- selected for installation
pCVD- not selected for installation
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 12
Signal Stability as a Function of Time
> Same setup as leakage current as function of HV
> Adding a Sr-90 source to generate signal current
>Measurement settings: -500V for 5h
0V for 1h
+500V for 5h
0V for 1h
> Expected signal current: ~ 10E-9
Sr-90
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 13
Signal Stability as a Function of Time
sCVD- not not selected for installation
sCVD- selected for installation pCVD- selected for installation
pCVD- not selected for installation
CMS11
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 14
Signal Stability as a Function of Time
> Erratic currents for pCVD diamonds
> Effect suppressed under magnetic field (PhD Thesis of Steffen Müller – University of Karlsruhe)
Done by F. Kassel (KIT)
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 15
CCE as a Function of Bias Voltage
>Measures the collected charge at different voltages
> Signal generation by electrons from Sr-90 (triggered by scintillators)
> Applying bias voltage by HV table
>Readout of signal with needle
>Using connecting bond for two pad metallization
> Possibility to switch on red diode light
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 16
CCE as a Function of Bias Voltage
>Ramping from 0V to 1kV in different steps
>Different treatment for pCVD & sCVD and for irradiated and non-irradiated diamonds
sCVD pCVD
Non-irradiated 1) 10min illumination with red light
2) Starting CCE ramping
1) 10min red illumination2) 1h pumping with Sr-903a) Starting CCE vs HV (constant HV)3b) Starting CCE vs HV (alternating HV)
irradiated 1) 10min red illumination2) 1h pumping with Sr-903a) Starting CCE vs HV (constant HV)3b) Starting CCE vs HV (alternating HV)
1) 10min red illumination2) 1h pumping with Sr-903a) Starting CCE vs HV (constant HV)3b) Starting CCE vs HV (alternating HV)
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 17
CCE as a Function of Bias Voltage
sCVD before and after irradiation of 24GeV proton equivalent (3.5 ·10E12 proton equivalent per fb−1)
pCVD before and after very high irradiation (taken from “Radiation Damage in the Diamond Based Beam Condition” Monitor of the CMS Experiment at the LHC at CERN” M. Guthoff et al.)
Constant HV
alternating HV
Constant HV
sCVD with constant HV and alternating HV
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 18
CCE as function of time for irradiated diamonds
> Same setup as for CCE vs HV
>Constant HV (500V)
>Monitoring CCE as a function of time Decrease of CCE can be observed
>Decrease can be suppressed by red diode light
500V
Diode off
Diode on
Diode off
Diode off
Diode on
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 19
Polarization
>Radiation damages the diamond crystal
> Traps are created Band gap at
Hypothesis: deep traps are at
> Process of polarization: Bias voltage is switched on
Sr-90 source creates e/h pairs
Free charge carrier density is larger at diamond edges
Traps are filled by free charge carriers asymmetric filling due to charge carrier density
Creation of space charge in the bulk
Compensation of external electrical field by internal field Polarization
>Red light energy at 1.9eV Releasing the trapped charge carriers
eVEG 4,5eVEG 35.1
4
1
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 20
Polarization – Possible Solutions
> Pumping of diamond with Sr-90 source for ~1h All traps are filled
Constant CCE over time
CCE reaches a minimum for the whole measurement
> Permanent illumination with red light Red light energy is 1.9eV
Releases trapped charge carriers
CCE reaches a maximum for the whole measurement
Red diode needs to be radiation hard!
>Using alternating polarity of HV (2-0.5Hz) Polarization cannot develop
CCE is enhanced
For our characterization we use mainly pumping. For study purpose we also make diode measurements and HV with alternating polarity..
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 21
Applications of Diamond Sensors
> Fast Beam Condition Monitor BCM1F
> Front-End of BCM1F Before 2012
>Upgrade BCM1F Front-End
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 22
The Fast Beam Condition Monitor
>Radiation hard beam condition monitor with ns time resolution
>Monitors luminosity and beam background Counting MIPs
> Before 2012 it contained 4 sCVD diamonds on each side of the CMS interaction point
1.8m away from the CMS IP
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 23
Front-End of BCM1F Before 2012
>One pad diamonds
> Signal generation by MIP
>Charge conversion to output voltage 20mV/fC
> Signal shaping Peaking time of 25ns
>Optical conversion with laser diode Optical driver 5cm from beam center
>Optical signal is sent to counting room
One pad diamond(5x5mm²)
Amplifier and shaper
Optical converter
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 24
BCM1F Front-End during Operation
>Radiation damage of laser diode (laser driver)
Decrease of dynamic range
>Monster signals Overshoot of signals
Saturation of laser driver
Long recovery time
>High signal rates for 25ns Two MIPs with 12.5ns cannot be
resolved
Long rise time (~25ns) Time-over-
threshold (~100ns)
Overshoot (few μs)
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 25
Upgrade of BCM1F Front-End
>Using 12 sCVD diamonds on each side of CMS IP Higher acceptance for background
> Two pad metallization Reducing the signal occupancy (more dynamic range)
>Dedicated front-end ASIC (amplifier) from Krakow University Less than 10ns FWHM
Conversion of 50mV/fC
>Different position of laser driver 16cm away form beam center
Peaking time of 10ns with 2ns ADC sampling time
Testbeam Signal with new Amplifier
Maria Hempel | Beam Impact Meeting | 29.8.2014 | Seite 26
Summary
>Diamonds can be fully characterized in Zeuthen with different techniques
Leakage current, signal stability, CCE
> Signal sizes depend on diamond material and absorbed dose Possible explanation is polarization
>Diamond based Condition Monitor was successfully running
> After LS1 an upgraded BCM1F system is prepared in order to face the new challenges