different type of vedanthas
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
1/17
1 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
Ved nta: A Comparative Analysis of Diverse SchoolsPrem Pahlajrai
Asian Languages and Literature
University of Washington
IntroductionTo the average person familiar with Hinduism, Ved nta is simply the last of the six
dar anas or systems of Hindu philosophy, based on the speculative inquiry into being
found in the Upani ads constituting the end, the anta, of the Vedic corpus. Some scholars
are prone to use Ved nta to refer to Advaita Ved nta alone, strict non-duality, of which
a kara is the most famous exponent. However, there are other Ved ntas, the better
known of which are R m nuja's vi i dvaita o r q u a l i f i e d n o n - d u a l i t y and Madhva's
dvaita, strict duality. In this paper I present the salient features of these schools along
with those of seven lesser known schools. Together with the aforementioned three,
Nimb rka's sv bh vikabhed bheda or natural difference and non-difference, Vallabha's
uddh dvaita or pure non-duality, constitute the paca-ved nta-samprad ya, the five
Ved nta traditions. The next five schools examined are lesser known but nonethelessinteresting interpretations: Bh skara's aup dhikabhed bheda or adventitious difference
and non-difference, r ka ha's vi i a iv dvaita o r q u a l i f i e d n o n - d u a l i t y w i t h i v a a s t h e
b a s i s , r pati's vi e dvaita o r s p e c i a l n o n - d u a l i t y , Vij nabhik u's avibh g dvaita or
non-duality of non-separateness, and Baladeva's acintyabhed bheda or inexplicable
duality and non-duality. Every one of these schools accepts the testimony of the
Upani ads as authoritative yet chooses to interpret them in different ways to support their
particular positions. I will briefly overview the standpoints of all these schools
individually. This will then facilitate comparison across several broad aspects and permit
us to make certain observations.
Brahmas
trabh
ya MethodologyIt is almost a requisite for proponents of any alternative views of Ved nta to give
credence to their views by providing a commentary of the Brahmastras of B
dar
ya
a,
thus attempting to demonstrate that their philosophy is the "true" interpretation of theVed nta (the Upani ads) as summarized in the Brahmas tra
1. The Brahmas tra is also
referred to as the Vedntas
tras or the
rirakam
m
s
s
tras and has a total of 560
s
tras or aphorisms intended as a systematized synthesis of the Upaniads. It may date as
far back as late second century or early first century BCE.2
The text is divided into four
adhy
yas, chapters. Each adhy
ya is divided into four quarters,p
das. The first adhy
ya,
the Samanvay
dhy
ya establishes that Brahman, the impersonal Absolute, is the sole
subject of the scriptures, the source of creation and the goal of one's life. The first four
s
tras of this chapter are commonly known as the Catu
s
tr
. The second chapter, theAvirodh
dhy
ya "deals with the consistency of the ideas relating to Brahman and
tman
1The Brahmas tras, the U p a n i s a d s and the Bhagavadg t together constitute theprasth natray , the
threefold authoritative foundation of Ved nta. The Upani ads are considered the rutiprashth na, the
Brahmas tras the ny yaprasth na and the G ta the sm tiprasth na. (Sastri, p.ii, Deutsch, p.3)2
Dasgupta, p. 421. Ayyangar (1979) claims that "occidental writers" picked this date in order to "show to
the world that the Indians copied everything from Greek literature." He suggests that B dar ya a was noneother than Vy sa and lived "about 3101 B.C. i.e. the beginning of the Kali age." (p.x)
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
2/17
2 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
drawn from the Upaniads"
3and refutes "the rival views of
S k h y a -yoga, Ny
ya-
Vaiesika, Buddhism, Jainism,
aivism and
aktism or
V a i s n a v i s m ".
4These two chapters
together constitute the philosophical portion of the text. Chapter three, S dhan dhy ya isabout the means for attaining moks
a, and chapter four, Phal
dhy
ya, is about the
successive stages ofm o k s a culminating in a final merging with Brahman.
The work is also divided into several sections, adhikara
as, with each sectionhaving six parts: 1. vi
aya, subject. 2. sa
aya, doubt. 3.p
rvapak
a, prima facie view.
4. uttarapaka, opposite view. 5. siddh
nta, conclusion and 6. sagati, consistency with
other parts of the work. Sa gati is intended to demonstrate that there is no conflict withthe rest of the work at the p da, adhy ya and scriptural level, as well as between sections
by way consistency of
k
epa, objection; d
nta, illustration; pratid
nta counter-
illustration; prasa ga, incidental illustration; utpatti, introduction and apav da,exception.
5
The Brahmastras are rather terse and a commentary is needed for it to be
understood. The first known commentary is thought to have been by either the
grammarian Bharthari
6in the fifth century CE about which not much is known or by
Baudh
yana
7
who is referred to in R
m
nuja's introduction to his commentary on theBrahmas tra. Baudh yana's commentary is not extant. Within the Ved nta system,
a
kara's is the earliest extant commentary though, and it is the one that everyone else
who follows takes great pains to refute. It is believed that the monistic views of a k a r a
were inspired by Gaudap da's commentary of the M ukya Upani ad rather than by the
original Brahmastra.
8Dasgupta, for example, believes that the Brahmas
tra was
probably more of an authoritative theist, dualist work.9
The schools of Vednta considered in the following are those where the founders
have written a commentary on the Brahmas
tras for the sake of demonstrating the
conformity of their views to the ruti, revealed scriptures. First let us consider the dates
of these individuals and a brief synopsis of their distinctive philosophies and views onliberation, to set the stage to enable a meaningful comparison. What follows has beengreatly informed by Chaudhuri (1973, 1975, 1981), Dasgupta (1922) and Sastri (1995).
1. KevaladvaitaWhen Ved nta is mentioned without any qualifications, most people tend to think
of keval
dvaita or absolute monism.
akara is the most famous proponent of this
school. The typical dates for him are 788-820 CE10
. But Paul Hacker suggests a timebefore or about 700 A.D. based on a karas quoting Dharmak rti in Upade as hasr ,
3Brockington, pp. 106-7
4
Sastri, p. ii.5Sastri, p. iii.
6Brockington, p. 107
7Dasgupta, v.1, pp. 70, 433
8Brockington, p. 107 and Dasgupta, v.1, pp. 422-3. G a u d a p d a was Govinda's teacher, who in turn was
a kara's teacher.9
Dasgupta, p. 432. Also confirmed by Thibaut, quoted in Apte, p. xxi. It appears that Thibaut was the
originator of this view, presented in the introduction to his translation of a kara's Brahmas trabh ya.However, Apte strenously objects to this view (pp. xxi-iii).10
For example, Brockington, 1996, p. 109.
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
3/17
PREM PAHLAJRAI 3
who lived mid-seventh century.11
Karl Potter argues for late seventh-early eighthcentury.
12Sure
vara, Padmap
da and To
aka were his direct students and other notable
advaitins in this school are V caspati Mi ra (840 CE), Vidy ra ya (1350 CE) to name
but a couple. To
akara, all diversity is unreal, mithy
and only Brahman is real, sat.
This reality is eternal, perfect, causeless, without change and all-pervading, the
substratum of everything. The individual self,j
va and the world,jagatappear as real dueto ignorance, avidy
. It is an illusion, vivarta, which has Brahman as its substratum. The
word m
y
is also sometimes used to describe the creation. It (m
y
) is consideredneither real nor unreal, but yet it is not ultimate. Epistemologically, m y is avidy . From
a metaphysical standpoint, m
y
may be considered as the mysterious power of Brahmanthat deludes us into taking the empirical world as reality
13though
a
kara takes pains
to not establish a connection between Brahman and m y . The means to liberation,
mok
a is the removal ofavidy
and the means for this is knowledge, j na alone.Mok ais not an attainment but simply a recognition of ones true nature as Brahman. Though this
school is typically described as monism,
a
kara actually called it non-dualism,advaita.
2. Vi i dvaitaR m nuja, the founder of the Vi i dvaitaor qualified monism doctrine is held to
have lived from 1017 to 1137 CE, a prodigiouslifespan of a hundred and twenty years!14
His birth date most likely was brought forward to permit him to be a successor ofY muna, who died in 1038.
15His doctrine attempted to synthesize Vai avism with
Ved
nta by emphasizing the theistic aspects of the Upaniads and the Brahmas
tras.
Whereas
a
kara maintained that Brahman, j
va and jagatare identical, for Rm
nuja,
j
va andjagatare real and distinct from Brahman but they exist based on Brahman alone.Though there is plurality among j
vas and jagat, the Brahman embodied in them is
singular. As Hiriyanna puts it, it is the qualifiedor the embodied that is one, while thefactors qualifying or embodying it are quite distinct, though inseparable, from it.
16In
other words, the plurality of the j
vas and jagat is the qualification of the non-dualBrahman, and hence the name of this system. Rather than Brahman, R
m
nuja prefers to
use the term vara, who is none other than Vi u or N r ya a. vara exists in all of us
j
vas as the inner controller, the antary
m
. He is omniscient and moves us all to action,fulfilling our desires according to our karma. Our free will is given to us by
vara. He
has created this world out of spontaneity and in play, l l . Liberation is the attainment ofthe world of N r ya a and the enjoyment of freedom and bliss there. This can be
achieved by prapatti, absolute self-surrender to Nr
ya
a and bhakti, which for
R m nuja means not faith-based devotion but rather meditation based upon the highest
knowledge which seeks to ignore everything that is not done for the sake of thedearest,
17i.e.
vara.
11In Halbfass, p. 27.
12Potter, Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, v. 3, p. 14.
13Deutsch, p. 30.
14Karmarkar, pp. xiii, xv and Dasgupta, pp. 100, 104. However Sastri, p. iv has 1140 A.D.
15Brockington, p. 134.
16M. Hiriyanna, p. 178.
17Dasgupta, v. 3, p. 161.
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
4/17
4 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
3. DvaitaMadhva is considered the principal exponent of the doctrine of duality (or
plurality), dvaita. Like Vi i dvaita it is theistic and has N r ya a as its principal deity
and its followers too consider this to be as old as the Upaniads and Madhva was merely
a great exponent of this truth in later times. Madhva himself went by the name of
nandat
rtha and claimed that he received his revelations directly from Vedavy
sahimself. There is some uncertainty over his dates Dasgupta gives 1197-1276 CE,Brockington merely suggests he flourished in the thirteenth century,
18and Sastri provides
1238-1317 CE.19
Madhva opposes the identity of Brahman and the j va and posits afivefold bheda or difference in reality: between Brahman and j vas, Brahman and jagat,
jvasandjagat, between individual j
vas, and withinjagatin its various forms. He claimsthis view is supported by common sense. Upani
ad statements such as Sarvam
khalvidam Brahma, all this is indeed Brahman, are explained from the standpoint of
teleology despite the differences, Brahman, i.e. Vi u, is immanent in the entire
creation and is its controller. And these differences persist, even past liberation, mok
a.
Mok
a is attained through our recognition of our own and Vi
us true natures and our
utter dependence on him. Knowledge of our own and Vi
us true natures may beachieved through study of the scriptures, but it is only mediate. Through devotion, bhakti,
one realizes Vi
us greatness and goodness, which leads to Vi
us grace, which alone
can cause mok
a. To develop this philosophy, Madhva dismisses monistic passages in theUpani
ads as merely figurative and instead accepts the authority of the entire Vedas and
the Vai ava Pur as as well. Another unique characteristic of this doctrine is that it
divides j
vas in to three kinds: those chosen for eventual liberation, those doomed toeternal damnation and those destined to perpetual rebirth
20and some argue for Christian
influences on his work.21
4. Sv bh vikabhed bhedaOnce again, there is uncertainty and debate regarding the dates of the founder of
this doctrine, Nimbrka. His bh
ya appears to reflect Rm
nujas style and thus he is
assumed to have lived after him. But there is some controversy whether he lived evenafter Madhva.
22He is commonly held to be extant before Madhva around either mid-
twelfth century CE23
or the mid-thirteenth century. However Malkovsky reports on theradical proposal of Joseph Satyanand who holds Nimb
rka to predate
a
k a r a at about
475-525 CE.24
Nimb rkas Brahmas trabh ya is relatively brief and does not contain
any refutation, siddh nta of opposing views, p rvapak as. His doctrine is considered tobe an adaptation of Bh skaras bhed bheda doctrine which we shall discuss shortly.
Similar to Rm
nuja, he holds that j
va andjagatare distinct from Brahman as regards
18
Brockington, p. 148.19These (Sastri, p. iv) are the dates I provide in the table below for Madhva, somewhat arbitrarily.
20Brockington, p. 150.
21For example, Torwesten, p.162.
22Dasgupta, v. 3, pp. 399-400.
23Tapasy nanda, p. 85 presents 1162 CE as the year of Nimb rkas death.
24Satyanand, Joseph (1994)Nimb rka: A Pre- a kra Ved ntin and His Philosophy, Christnagar-Varanasi:
Vishwa Jyoti Gurukul. Satyanands arguments are summarized in Malkovsky, pp.116-127. Regrettably, I
have only very recently come across this and beyond mentioning this fact, I am unable to incorporate it anygreater detail at this point.
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
5/17
PREM PAHLAJRAI 5
their forms, attributes and functions, i.e. their gu
as, yet by nature, svar
pa they areidentical. Where R
m
nuja emphasized the identity of nature, Nimb
rka holds that the
difference, bheda and identity, abheda are both equally important. The seemingcontradiction of identity and difference coexists in harmony in Brahman as an organic
whole and this is just inherent to Brahmans nature, i.e. it is sv
bh
vika. Brahman is
non-different from the j
vas and jagat because they depend on Him for their being ortheir very existence, but He is different from them as He is self-dependent and possessesthe unique qualities of omniscience, omnipotence and the like which the latter do not
possess.25
Nimb rka doesnt consider j va-jagat as qualities or attributes of Brahmansince to do so differentiates the possessor of the attribute from the attribute. J vas are
liberated only by
varas grace. This liberation is achieved either throughj nayoga, thepath of knowledge or through bhaktiyoga, devotion. Performance of ones duties without
personal desire prepares the way for passionate devotion of vara and for self-surrenderto him. Liberation is achieved only on death and is of four grades, ranging from
proximity to
vara to merger with him without losing ones individual nature. In otherwords the difference and identity persists throughout.
5. uddh dvaitaThe system of Vallabha (1479-1531 CE)
26puts forth the pure, uddha non-duality
of Brahman, untouched by m
y
. J
va-jagatare nothing but manifestations of Brahman,which is K
a. M
y
is the power of K
a, which causes the misunderstanding of the
jagat. It is only the non-difference, abheda that is real, while the perception of all
seeming difference, bheda exists for the sake of K
as sport, l l . While Brahman can
be attained via action and knowledge, this is the lower or ak
ara Brahman with limitedbliss. The bhakti m
rga is superior and easy to follow, resulting in participation in the l
l
of K
a. Liberation of the j
va is dependent on K
as grace. Vallabhas philosophy
may be felt to lack the intellectual arguments and debate that characterizes a karas
work. Brahman is to be known not intellectually, but intuitively.27
J
vas are to Brahman
like sparks to a fire, they are parts of Brahman which lack the divine qualities owing tosuppression, tirobh va, of Brahmans bliss. There are a multiplicity of types ofj vas,
includingj
van-muktas, pu
i j
vas andprav
ha j
vas among others.28
Pu
im
rga or thepath of grace is the path of complete self-surrender and innate faith in K a, that his
grace will certainly save the follower on this path. This has implications of pre-
destination and denial of free will, total dependence on K
as grace. But for apu
i j
va,
devotion is the means and the end, service of K a leads to the highest bliss. Bhakti
results in a three-fold fruit: K
a subordinates himself to the devotee, the devotee attains
association with the divine and ultimately a supernatural body is attained whereby thedevotee can participate in the divine sports of K a.
25Tapasy nanda, pp. 89-90.
26This (1479-1531 CE) is the date in Marfatia, p. 8, Reddington, p. 1 and Brockington, p. 165. Sastri, p. iv
has 1479-1544. But Shah, pp. 4,52 suggests 1473/9-1532, Tapasy nanda, p. 201 gives 1473-1531 and
Dasgupta, v.4, p.371 has 1481-1533.27
Shah, p. 55.28
For a detailed treatment, see Marfatia, p. 24.
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
6/17
6 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
6. Aup dhikabhed bhedaThis version of the bhed
bheda or identity in diversity doctrine was formulated by
Bh skara and is considered a precursor to Nimb rkas doctrine. Bh skara is known to be
definitely after
a
kara and before Rm
nuja, who refutes his views in his bh
ya.29
Hajime Nakamura dates him to 750-800 CE.30
Bh
skara also is critical of
a
karas
doctrines dependence on m
y
he believes that
a
kara ignored the Upani
adicpassages which describe Brahman as possessed of attributes. For Bhskara, Brahman
manifests itself in various forms and effects, asj
va-jagat, by taking on up
dhis, limiting
adjuncts. These up dhis are real and due to Brahmans power, they cause the bondage ofj
vas. His sense ofup
dhi here is different from that of
a
kara, who holds that up
dhis
are ultimately unreal, mithy . Liberation or mok a is a state of fullest bliss, nanda and itis not ever present and eternal it has to be attained through both karma andj na and is
achieved only after the fall of the physical body. In other words, j
van-mukti is notpossible. By performance of ones duties prescribed by the Vedas without any attachment
to the fruits, as well as by meditation on Brahman and the j
vas oneness with it, one canrelease oneself from the bondage of the up
dhis. Interestingly, there is no bhakti involved
in this process. Bh
skaras doctrine is considered a forgotten system in Indianphilosophy.31
Though he is critical of a karas view, his alternate system is hobbled by
the logical inconsistencies of his unique up
dhi doctrine.
7. Vi i a iv dvaitaThe date of 1270 CE that I have for the founder of this school, r ka ha, occurs
only in one source32
and is not substantiated elsewhere. The only thing known for certainis that he came after
a
kara, aspects of whose doctrine he refutes
33and before the
sixteenth century, from when we have a commentary on his Brahmas tra bh ya.34
Thephilosophy of this doctrine is coupled with the theism where
iva is the highest deity and
is equated to Brahman. Brahman is different in nature from the j
va-jagat, yet these arepervaded by Brahman and hence non-different too. However, r ka ha doesnt support
absolute monism, absolute dualism or identity-in-difference, bhed
bheda. The relation is
one of cause and effect the effect is not separate from the cause, yet they are notidentical either, since the cause transcends the effect, despite being immanent in the
effect. Brahman,
iva is qualified, vi
i
a byj
va-jagatand together they form an organic
whole, advaita, hence the name of the doctrine, vi i a iv dvaita. Individuals achieveliberation through knowledge, for which one prepares by performing karmas in
accordance with dharma. And it is the knowledge of
iva-nature,
ivatva which isachieved through meditation on the nature of
iva as being non-different from ones own.
In fact it is only through
ivas grace that karma has efficacy and can allow for thepossibility of liberation.
35Liberation is possible both while still living (j
van-mukti), as
29See Chaudhuri (1981), pp.3-5 where the evidence presented can put Bh skara anywhere in the 8th to
10th century CE, coming after a m k a r a , but before V caspati Mi ra, 841-2 CE and R m nuja 1016-17 CE.Hacker, on the other hand, held V caspati to the tenth century. (Halbfass, p.100, n.44).30
InA History of Early Ved nta Philosophy, pp. 66-7, cited in Malkovsky, p. 3.31
Tapasy nanda, p. 87.32
Sastri, p. iv. I did later find a date of13th
century AD ascribed to him in Khanna, p. 470.33
Chaudhuri (1962), pp. 5-7.34
Appaya D k itas iv rka-Ma i-Dpik c.1550 AD.35
Dasgupta, v.5, pp. 86-7.
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
7/17
PREM PAHLAJRAI 7
well as after death (videha-mukti). Yet, the liberated individual, though all-pervading,vibh
still lacks
ivas powers of creation and destruction and is not quite united with
iva a slight difference still persists.
8. Vi e dvaitaThis doctrine is followed by the V ra aiva or Li g yat sect and its founder, r pati
is dated approximately to fourteenth century CE, with the usual uncertainties.36
Here,
Brahman is iva, and is sagu a and savi e a, i.e. possessed of qualities and differences.Creation is a sport, l
l
on the part of
iva, in order that j
vas can work out their karma.
The relation between Brahman andj
va-jagatis that ofbhed
bheda, identity in differenceas seen in other doctrines also, with abheda, identity dominant. But he also asserts that
bheda and abheda dont coexist at the same time. The bheda is during bondage and the
abheda during liberation. He provides two explanations for the term vi
e
dvaita: vi
e
adenotes the bheda, difference and advaita the abheda between Brahman and j va.
Alternately, vi
e
a can be interpreted as special to denote that this is a special kind ofadvaita. This term is deliberately chosen to differentiate this doctrine from R
m
nujas
vi
i
dvaita which he refutes in his bh
ya along with those of
a
kara and Madhva.Liberation is similar to that of Vi
i
a
iv
dvaita, thej
va takes on the nature of Brahman
but remains subservient to iva. Butj van-mukti is not possible according to this system.The means for liberation are similar too, with the added stipulation that the seeker should
apply the outer marks of
iva on ones body. In fact, merely doing so may be adequate toachieve liberation.
37
9. Avibh g dvaitaVij nabhik u, the formulator of this doctrine, is more famous for his commentary
on the S
khyas
tras and is assigned to either the sixteenth century or the mid-
seventeenth century CE.38
His philosophy is theistic monism grafted onto the classical
S
khya dualism ofpuru
a andprak
ti. Brahman holds within itselfpuru
a andprak
tiand manifests itself in diverse forms. It is the basis for the universe, it holds it togetherand it exists in the universe, undivided and indistinguishable. There is no duality as the
universe cannot be conceived of apart from Brahman which forms its basis yet remainsunchanged in its transcendental reality.J
vas are derived from Brahman like sparks from
a fire. They are the nature of pure consciousness, like Brahman, yet they retain their
individuality. Prak
ti andpuru
a together form the conditioning factors, up
dhis for the
j
vas which cause them to appear limited and finite, distinct from Brahman. Trueknowledge of Brahman cannot be found through the intellect, buddhi, since it continually
reaffirms the tendency for separation. Brahman thus can only be realized by bhakti aslove. The process of listening to
varas name, adoring him, describing his virtues, and
meditation ultimately lead to true knowledge and a state of non-difference with ultimate
consciousness, Brahman.
36Rao, p. 31: between 1300 and 1400 A.D. Dasgupta, p. 173: latter half of the fourteenth century.
Chaudhuri (1981) p. 187: probably during the 14th
Cent. A.D. Sastri, p. iv. 1400 A.D.37
For a discussion of the differences between r pati, a kara, R m nuja and r ka ha and an overallevaluation of r patis doctrine, see Rao, pp. 698-704 and Chaudhuri (1981), pp. 229-40.38
Dasgupta, v.1, pp. 212, 221: sixteenth century. Rao, p. 153: mid-seventeenth century. Sastri, p. v: 1600A.D.
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
8/17
8 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
10.Acintyabhed bhedaThere is some degree of agreement that Baladeva, the spokesman of this school of
inexplicable, acintya identity in difference, duality and nonduality, can be located in themid-to-latter half of the eighteenth century.
39He was a Vai ava follower of the Caitanya
sect and the Bengali Gau
ya school and he also traced his lineage back to the Madhva
school.
40
Brahman is the same as
vara who is also K
a. He possesses all thedifferences and yet is without difference. This inconsistency is resolved by a novel
conception ofvi e a, peculiarity, which allows affirmation of the qualities of Brahmaneven though there is no difference between Brahman and its qualities. Thus there is
bheda and abheda between Brahman andj
va-jagat. Baladeva resolves this inconsistencyuniquely by claiming that it is inexplicable, acintya from the human perspective, it is the
play, l
l
of Vi
u. Liberation, mukti is only possible without a body, i.e. it is videha, and
has five grades, ranging from attaining the form of
vara to being in the closest possiblerelation with him. Still, even at the highest grade of mukti, the j
va is different from
Brahman. Karma performed unselfishly (ni
k
ma) helps purify the heart in preparation
for mok a. Knowledge, j na is the only means to liberation, but bhakti is also
considered a form of knowledge and involves worship of and self-surrender to
vara.Ultimately, liberation requires
varas grace.
Having now overviewed these schools individually, we can proceed to compare
them with each other. To facilitate this, I've laid out their characteristic aspects in tabularform.
39
Chaudhuri (1981), p. 241: flourished in the 18th
century A.D. Dasgupta, v.4, p. 438, locates one of his
works to 1764 CE and Sastri, p. v, dates him to 1725 A.D. The only dissenting opinion is from Rao, p. 181,
with two sets of almost similar dates: 1486-1534 and 1485-1533.40
Chaudhuri (1981), pp. 241-4, 249-51.
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
9/17
9 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
T y p e :
A s p e c t
K e v a l d v a i t a
4 1
V i i d v a i t a S v b h v i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 2
D v a i t a
4 3
u d d h d v a i t a
4 4
A u p d h i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 5
V i i a -
i v d v a i t a
T r a n s l a t i o n A b s o l u t e
m o n i s m
Q u a l i f i e d
m o n i s m
N a t u r a l
d i f f e r e n c e a n d
n o n - d i f f e r e n c e
D i f f e r e n c e o r
P l u r a l i t y
P u r e m o n i s m A d v e n t i t i o u s
d i f f e r e n c e a n d
n o n - d i f f e r e n c e
Q u a l i f i e d
m o n i s m w i t h
i v a b e i n g
c e n t r a l
P r o p o n e n t a k a r a R m n u j a N i m b r k a M a d h v a V a l l a b h a B h s k a r a r k a h a
D a t e s
4 7
L a t e 7
t h
/ e a r l y 8
t h
c e n t u r y C E
1 0 1 7 - 1 1 3 7 C E M i d 1 2
t h
/ m i d
1 3
t h
c e n t u r y
C E
4 8
1 2 3 8 - 1 3 1 7 C E 1 4 7 9 - 1 5 3 1 C E 7 5 0 - 8 0 0 C E 1 2 7 0 C E
B r a h m a s t r a
C o m m e n t a r y
r i r a k a -
m m s -
b h y a a . k . a .
k a r a - b h y a
r b h y a V e d n t a -
p r i j t a -
s a u r a b h a
P r a -
p r a j a b h y a
4 9
A u b h y a B h s k a r a - b h y a
a . k . a . r i r a k a -
m m s - b h y a
a i v a b h y a ,
a . k . a . B r a h m a -
m m s -
b h y a
T y p e o f
D o c t r i n e
M o n i s m ,
i l l u s i o n i s m
M o n o t h e i s m M o n o t h e i s m M o n o t h e i s m M o n o t h e i s m N o n - t h e i s t i c
m o n i s m
M o n o t h e i s m
V i e a t v a o f
B r a h m a n
( p a r t i c u l a r i t y )
N i r v i e a ,
d e v o i d o f
i n t e r n a l
d i f f e r e n c e s
S a v i e a ,
p o s s e s s e d o f
s v a g a t a - b h e d a s ,
i n t e r n a l
d i f f e r e n c e s
S a v i e a ,
p o s s e s s e d o f
s v a g a t a - b h e d a s
N i r v i e a N i r v i e a N i r v i e a a s
k r a a , c a u s e ;
s a v i e a a s
k r y a , e f f e c t
S a v i e a ,
a b o d e o f a l l
s u p r e m e l y
a u s p i c i o u s
q u a l i t i e s
E k a t v a o f
B r a h m a n
( o n e n e s s )
" E k a m e v -
d v i t y a m "
C h n d . U . 6 . 2 . 1
u n c o m p r o m i s -
i n g
E k a , j v a &
j a g a t a r e
a t t r i b u t e s o f
B r a h m a n
E k a , j v a &
j a g a t a r e
a t t r i b u t e s o f
B r a h m a n
E k a , j v a & j a g a t
a r e p r a t i b i m b a s ,
r e f l e c t i o n s o f
B r a h m a n
E k a , b u t o n l y
r e g a r d i n g c a u s e
a n d e f f e c t . J v a s
d i f f e r f r o m
B r a h m a n i n g u a
a n d a k t i
E k a i n k r a a -
r p a , b u t
n n t v a a s
k r y a - r p a
E k a
41
Also termed nirvi
e
dvaita42
Also referred to as dvait
dvaita with or without the sv
bh
bika qualifier.43
Also known as bhedav
da44 There is also the uddh dvaita of Vi usv min, which may be a precursor but there is not much directly known ab45
This is also often referred to as simply bhed bheda, or dvait dvaita46
Also variously referred to as se var dvaita, iv dvaita, v ra aiva-v i i s t d v a i t a , sarva rutis ramata, and confusingdvait
dvaita47
Controversies regarding dates are footnoted where relevant and also in the sections above on the respective school48
Joseph Satyanand however places Ni b
rka at 475-525 CE. See s.v. and footnote 24 above.49
This is also often referred to as simply
rimad Brahmas
trabh
sya. Madhva also wrote a summary of his views in
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
10/17
10 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
T y p e :
A s p e c t
K e v a l d v a i t a
4 1
V i i d v a i t a S v b h v i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 2
D v a i t a
4 3
u d d h d v a i t a
4 4
A u p d h i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 5
V i i a -
i v d v a i t a
G u a t v a o f
B r a h m a n
( P o s s e s s i o n o f
q u a l i t i e s )
N i r g u a S a g u a ,
p o s s e s s i n g o n l y
a u s p i c i o u s
a t t r i b u t e s .
S a g u a ,
p o s s e s s i n g o n l y
a u s p i c i o u s
a t t r i b u t e s .
S a g u a S a g u a a n d
n i r g u a
5 0 , 5 1
S a g u a S a g u a
K r i y a t v a ,
a g e n c y o f
B r a h m a n
N i k r i y S a k r i y S a k r i y S a k r i y S a k r i y N i k r i y S a k r i y
V i k r a t v a ,
t r a n s f o r m a t i o n
o f B r a h m a n
N i r v i k r a N i r v i k r a N i r v i k r a N i r v i k r a N i r v i k r a N i r v i k r a N i r v i k r a
T h e o r y o f
C a u s a t i o n
V i v a r t a v d a ,
a p p a r e n t
m a n i f e s t a t i o n
P a r i m a v d a ,
r e a l
m a n i f e s t a t i o n
P a r i m a v d a ,
r e a l
m a n i f e s t a t i o n
P a r i m a v d a ,
r e a l
m a n i f e s t a t i o n .
A l l t h i n g s
d e p e n d o n
B r a h m a n w h i c h
i s a l l - p e r v a s i v e .
B u t B r a h m a n i s
n i m i t t a k r a a
o n l y , e f f i c i e n t
c a u s e a n d n o t t h e
u p d n a k r a a ,
m a t e r i a l c a u s e .
2 k i n d s .
P a r i m a v d a ,
r e a l
m a n i f e s t a t i o n
a n d a v i k t a
p a r i m a v d a ,
u n c h a n g e d
t r a n s f o r m a t i o n .
I n f o r m e r : j v a
a n d j a g a t c o m e
f r o m B r a h m a n
a n d a r e a p a r t o f
i t . B u t d u e t o t h e
l a t t e r B r a h m a n
r e m a i n s
u n c h a n g e d .
a k t i v i k e p a
p a r i m a v d a ,
t r a n s f o r m a t i o n
v i a p r o j e c t i o n o f
B r a h m a n ' s
p o w e r s . A l l
t h i n g s d e p e n d o n
B r a h m a n w h i c h
i s a l l - p e r v a s i v e .
B r a h m a n i s
n i m i t t a k r a a ,
e f f i c i e n t c a u s e a s
w e l l a s t h e
u p d n a k r a a ,
m a t e r i a l c a u s e .
T h e c a u s e a n d
e f f e c t a r e
i d e n t i c a l a s w e l l
a s d i f f e r e n t :
b h i n n b h i n n a
P a r i m a -
v d a .
B r a h m a n i s
b o t h , t h e
n i m i t t a a n d
u p d n a
k r a a ,
e f f i c i e n t a n d
m a t e r i a l
c a u s e . T h e
e f f e c t i s a
t r a n s f o r m a t i o n
o f t h e
u n c h a n g e a b l e
B r a h m a n
b r o u g h t a b o u t
t h r o u g h l l ,
p l a y a s a n
e x p r e s s i o n o f
i v a ' s a k t i
P h e n o m e n a l
E x i s t e n c e
M i t h y d u e t o
m y , w h i c h i s
i n d e f i n a b l e , a n d
d u e t o a v i d y
S a t y a S a t y a S a t y a S a t y a . M y i s
n o t a v i d y b u t
B r a h m a n ' s
a c i n t y a a k t i
S a t y a , b e c a u s e
t h e u p d h i
5 2
i s
r e a l , t h o u g h
a n i t y a
S a t y a
50
For Vallabha, Brahman has svar pa and svabh va, ie. s a g u n a , but these are outward manifestations and are absolu
is ultimately n i r g u n a 51
Theg u n
a s
of brahman are acintya and ananta, inconceivable by us and therefore apparently contradictory52
For a m k a r a however, the up dh, limiting condition is anitya and asatya, ap ram rthika
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
11/17
PREM PAHLAJRAI
T y p e :
A s p e c t
K e v a l d v a i t a
4 1
V i i d v a i t a S v b h v i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 2
D v a i t a
4 3
u d d h d v a i t a
4 4
A u p d h i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 5
V i i a -
i v d v a i t a
R e l a t i o n s h i p
b e t w e e n
B r a h m a n , j v a
a n d j a g a t
P r a m r t h i k a
( u l t i m a t e )
i d e n t i t y ,
v y a v a h r i k a
( e m p i r i c a l )
r e a l i t y &
d i f f e r e n c e d u e t o
m y
I d e n t i c a l
( a b h e d a ) i n
s v a r p a ,
e s s e n t i a l n a t u r e ,
b u t d i f f e r e n t i n
v i e a g u a -
h e n c e t h e n a m e
o f t h i s s c h o o l .
T h e a b h e d a
t a k e s
p r e c e d e n c e .
B r a h m a n i s t h e
w h o l e w h i l e
j v a - j a g a t a r e
t h e p a r t s o f
w h i c h B r a h m a n
i s t h e
a n t a r y m , t h e
i n t e r n a l
r e g u l a t o r .
C a u s e
( B r a h m a n ) a n d
e f f e c t ( j v a -
j a g a t ) i d e n t i c a l
i n s v a r p a , b u t
d i f f e r e n t i n
g u a . T h e
a b h e d a a n d
b h e d a a r e o n
p a r w i t h e a c h
o t h e r
A b s o l u t e
d i f f e r e n c e
b e t w e e n
B r a h m a n , j v a
a n d j a g a t . .
A b s o l u t e
i d e n t i t y .
B r a h m a n h a s s a t -
c i t - n a n d a
g u a s , j v a s a t -
c i t , a n d j a g a t
o n l y s a t
B r a h m a n i s
v i b h , j v a i s a u
J v a - j a g a t a r e
b h i n n b h i n n a
f r o m B r a h m a n
d u r i n g i t s
k r y v a s t h ,
s a s r a , b u t
n o n - d i f f e r e n t
d u r i n g i t s
k r a v a s t h ,
d u r i n g
d i s s o l u t i o n a n d
l i b e r a t i o n .
B r a h m a n a n d
j v a - j a g a t a r e
n e i t h e r
a b s o l u t e l y
d i f f e r e n t , n o r
a b s o l u t e l y
i d e n t i c a l , n o r
b o t h d i f f e r e n t
a n d n o n -
d i f f e r e n t . T h e
r e l a t i o n i s t h a t
o f c a u s e a n d
e f f e c t , o n e i s
i m p o s s i b l e
w i t h o u t t h e
o t h e r . T h e
c a u s e
t r a n s c e n d s t h e
e f f e c t t h o u g h
i t i s i m m a n e n t
i n t h e e f f e c t .
R e l a t i o n s h i p
b e t w e e n
B r a h m a n a n d
v a r a
v a r a i s s a g u a
B r a h m a n , t h e
m y r e f l e c t e d
f o r m o f B r a h m a n
B r a h m a n i s
v a r a , n o n e
o t h e r t h a n
V i u
B r a h m a n i s
v a r a , n o n e
o t h e r t h a n r
K a
B r a h m a n i s
v a r a , n o n e
o t h e r t h a n V i u
B r a h m a n i s
v a r a , n o n e
o t h e r t h a n r
K a
B r a h m a n i s
v a r a , b u t n o n -
t h e i s t i c .
B r a h m a n i s
i v a
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
12/17
12 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
T y p e :
A s p e c t
K e v a l d v a i t a
4 1
V i i d v a i t a S v b h v i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 2
D v a i t a
4 3
u d d h d v a i t a
4 4
A u p d h i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 5
V i i a -
i v d v a i t a
M o k a ,
l i b e r a t i o n
I d e n t i t y w i t h
B r a h m a n a l r e a d y
e x i s t s , b u t
f o r g o t t e n d u e t o
a j n a
R e a l i z a t i o n o f
t h e s v a r p a
i d e n t i t y w i t h
B r a h m a n ; g u a
d i f f e r e n c e
p e r s i s t s . J v a n -
m u k t i , l i b e r a t i o n
i n t h e p r e s e n t
e x i s t e n c e i s n o t
p o s s i b l e .
R e a l i z a t i o n o f
t h e s v a r p a
i d e n t i t y w i t h
B r a h m a n ; g u a
d i f f e r e n c e
p e r s i s t s . E v e n
p a s t d e a t h , a
m u k t a j v a i s
s e p a r a t e f r o m
B r a h m a n
D i f f e r e n c e
b e t w e e n
B r a h m a n a n d
j v a p e r s i s t s p o s t -
m o k a . J v a i s
u n l i m i t e d
k n o w l e d g e a n d
b l i s s , b u t s t i l l
d e p e n d e n t o n
v a r a .
J v a n m u k t i i s n o t
p o s s i b l e .
I d e n t i t y w i t h
B r a h m a n a l r e a d y
e x i s t s . J v a i s
b o u n d i n
s a s r a d u e t o
a v i d y . A m u k t a
j v a s t i l l d i f f e r s
f r o m B r a h m a n
r e m a i n i n g a u
a n d l a c k i n g
p o w e r s o f s i ,
s t h i t i a n d l a y a
J v a n - m u k t i i s
s u p p o e r t e d .
M o k a i s n o t
p u r e k n o w l e d g e ,
b u t f u l l n e s s o f
n a n d a . J v a i s
n o t n i t y a m u k t a .
J v a n m u k t i i s n o t
p o s s i b l e . M o k a
i s p o s s i b l e o n l y
a f t e r f a l l o f t h e
e a r t h l y b o d y .
M o k a i s t h e
a t t a i n m e n t o f
i v a t v a . B u t
t h e j v a o n l y
b e c o m e s
s i m i l a r t o , n o t
i d e n t i c a l w i t h
i v a . T h e
m u k t a j v a i s
v i b h , a l l -
p e r v a s i v e b u t
l a c k s t h e
p o w e r o f s i ,
s t h i t i a n d l a y a .
J v a n - m u k t i
a n d v i d e h a -
m u k t i a r e
s u p p o r t e d .
M u k t i i s n i t y a .
S d h a n a T a t t v a j n a o f
t m a a n d
B r a h m a n
B h a k t i , w h i c h i s
c o n s i d e r e d t h e
m a t u r e f o r m o f
j n a . T h i s
i n v o l v e s r a t h e r
t h a n f e e l i n g ,
c o n t e m p l a t i o n
o f t h e s t e r n e r ,
m o r e d i s t a n t
a s p e c t s o f
v a r a
E m o t i o n a l
b h a k t i ,
i n v o l v i n g
c o n t e m p l a t i o n
o f t h e s w e e t e r ,
m o r e b e n i g n ,
c l o s e r a s p e c t s o f
v a r a
J n a l e a d s t o
b h a k t i , b h a k t i t o
d h y n a ,
m e d i t a t i o n . T h e
l a t t e r t w o a r e
d i r e c t m e a n s t o
m o k a . U l t i m a t e
c a u s e t h o u g h i s
v a r a ' s g r a c e
T h r o u g h j n a ,
t h e a k a r a
B r a h m a n c a n b e
r e a l i z e d . B h a k t i
a l o n e r e v e a l s t h e
n a n d a o f
B r a h m a n . P u i -
b h a k t i r e q u i r e s
o n l y v a r a ' s
g r a c e
J n a a l o n g w i t h
k a r m a i s n e e d e d
f o r m o k a .
A t t a c h m e n t t o
B r a h m a n i s
r e q u i r e d i n t h e
f o r m o f b h a k t i
w h i c h r a t h e r t h a n
f e e l i n g - b a s e d i s
d h y n a o n
n i r g u a ,
n i r v i e a ,
n i r k r a
B r a h m a n .
J n a , n o t
k a r m a , i s t h e
m e a n s . J n a
l e a d s t o
u p s a n a o r
d h y n a o n t h e
s v a r p a o f
i v a b e i n g
n o n - d i f f e r e n t
f r o m o n e ' s
o w n n a t u r e .
D i v i n e g r a c e
t h e n l e a d s t o
m o k a
53
Dasgupta, v.3, pp.450-1 uses terms as "Ultimate Being," "Ultimate Principle" to be different from "great soul, par
these corresponds to Brahman
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
13/17
PREM PAHLAJRAI
T y p e :
A s p e c t
K e v a l d v a i t a
4 1
V i i d v a i t a S v b h v i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 2
D v a i t a
4 3
u d d h d v a i t a
4 4
A u p d h i k a -
b h e d b h e d a
4 5
V i i a -
i v d v a i t a
S p e c i a l
F e a t u r e s
" w h a t i s
p r a m r t h i k a t o
R m n u j a i s
v y a v a h r i k a t o
a k a r a "
E t e r n a l h e l l i s
p o s s i b l e . V y u ,
s o n o f V i u
m e d i a t e s
s a l v a t i o n t h r o u g h
V i u - i n f l u e n c e
o f C h r i s t i a n i t y ? ?
M o n i s t i c
p a s s a g e s o f t h e
U p a n i a d s a r e
d i s m i s s e d a s
m e r e l y
f i g u r a t i v e .
A t t e m p t s t o
a d d r e s s
w e a k n e s s o f
m y i n
a k a r a ' s
d o c t r i n e .
S o m e c o n s i d e r
B h s k a r a t o b e a
p r a c c h a n n a
a d v a i t i n , a
d i s g u i s e d m o n i s t
M y a s U m
i s a p a r a a k t i
o f i v a . i v a
i s l o v e , a n d
f o r a n o b j e c t
o f h i s f u l l e s t
l o v e , U m
a p p e a r s a s
t h o u g h
d i f f e r e n t f r o m
i v a , t h r o u g h
l l
L i m i t a t i o n s ,
O b s t a c l e s ( a s
p e r c e i v e d b y
t h o s e e x t e r n a l
t o t h e s y s t e m )
M y i s h a r d t o
a c c e p t , t h e r e
b e i n g n o
e m p i r i c a l
e v i d e n c e . T h e
m o n i s t i c d o c t r i n e
i s a g a i n s t a l l
e x p e r i e n c e . I t i s
v e r y i m p e r s o n a l
a n d n i r g u a
B r a h m a n i s h a r d
t o r e l a t e t o .
F e n c e - s i t t e r
c a n t b e b o t h
d u a l a n d
n o n d u a l ! T h e
p a r t s ( j v a -
j a g a t ) c a n ' t b e
i d e n t i c a l w i t h
B r a h m a n i n
s v a r p a a n d y e t
d i f f e r e n t i n
g u a a n d a k t i .
M o k a s
d e p e n d e n c e o n
V i u s g r a c e i s
v i e w e d a s
s u b v e r t i n g t h e
l a w s o f k a r m a .
T h e j v a - j a g a t
a r e n o t i d e n t i c a l
w i t h B r a h m a n
b e c a u s e t h e n
B r a h m a n w o u l d
s u f f e r t h e i r
i m p e r f e c t i o n s .
C o e x i s t e n c e o f
b h e d a a n d
a b h e d a i s
i l l o g i c a l .
D o e s n ' t b o t h e r
w i t h t h e
r e f u t a t i o n o f
r i v a l t h e o r i e s .
S t r i c t s e p a r a t i o n
o f B r a h m a n , j v a
a n d j a g a t i s
p h i l o s o p h i c a l l y
c o n t r a d i c t o r y t o
n i r v i e a t v a o f
B r a h m a n
p a r t i c u l a r l y i f
B r a h m a n i s a l l -
p e r v a s i v e
t h r o u g h j v a -
j a g a t . A l s o ,
e t e r n a l h e l l a n d
g r a c e d o n o t f i t
w i t h k a r m a
t h e o r y .
C o n t r a d i c t i o n o f
e k a t v a o f
B r a h m a n w i t h
s e p a r a t i o n o f
m u k t a j v a s f r o m
B r a h m a n . D v a i t a
s t i l l p e r s i s t s !
S a m e w i t h
s a g u a t v a a n d
n i r v i e a t v a o f
B r a h m a n . P u i
b h a k t i i m p l i e s
p r e d e s t i n a t i o n
a n d l a c k o f f r e e
w i l l .
U n l i k e f o r
a k a r a ,
B r a h m a n i s f r e e
f r o m 3 o f t h e 4
v i k r a s : c r e a t i o n ,
c h a n g e , r e f o r m .
I t i s h o w e v e r
p y a , a t t a i n a b l e
t h i s s e e m s t o
i m p l y t h a t j v a
j a g a t a r e o t h e r
t h a n B r a h m a n , a
c o n t r a d i c t i o n .
B r a h m a n a s b o t h
n i r g u a a n d
s a g u a i s a l s o
i l l o g i c a l . P e c u l i a r
d e f i n i t i o n o f
u p d h i
S i m i l a r i s s u e s
a s R m n u j a ' s
V i i d v a i t a .
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
14/17
14 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
Doctrines Not ConsideredIn the above analysis, I chose to leave out Vi
usv
min'suddh
dvaita which is
treated as a separate school by Chaudhuri (1981). What little is known about him and his
views is only through the writings and references of others, and does not seem to be anydifferent from Vallabha's views. Some consider Vi
usv
min to be a predecessor of
Vallabha, but this view is not accepted by all.
54
Chaudhuri also presents Vivekananda'sschool as mnav
dvaita, humanistic monism.
55I didn't deem it to merit an independent
column in the above analysis, since it is mainly monistic advaita combined with a theistic
bhakti approach towards one's fellow humans, considered them as Brahman personified.As such, bhakti is added as a secondary s dhana.
A more significant omission from this comparative analysis might be that of neo-advaita. It may come down to be no different than
a
kara's advaita as presented in the
above analysis, but mostly due to time constraints, I have chosen not to delve deeper at
present.56
I will simply present a token quote here to provide a sense: "[Neo-Vednta]
strives to find ever more adequate concepts for describing the Absolute [author's term for
Brahman], not as a goal to be achieved (only mok
a is the goal) but as progress in the
interminable search for understanding. [] Neo-Ved
nta is not a doctrine to be acceptedor rejected but a way of thinking capable of infinite development and variation, a livelyshoot on the ancient stock of Ved
nta philosophy."
57
Some Observations
What may not readily be apparent from this analysis is that all these differentschools accept the "law" of karma and that one's highest purpose in life is to strive for
mok
a, liberation from the cycle of birth and suffering and death, sams ra. These schoolsmay disagree about how moks
a can be best achieved, what form it will take and whetherit is attainable in the present life or beyond but none denies that freedom is actually
possible.
I am reminded of the Buddhist references to ku
ala up
ya, expedient means toreconcile divergent and seemingly contradictory teachings ascribed to the Buddhahimself. For Ved
nta it is slightly different rather than ascribing their opinions to a
specific person like the Buddha, it is the ruti that the "founders" of the various schoolsinvoke to support their views and their task is made harder by the fact that the words of
the
ruti are fixed, only the interpretations can vary and it is their burden to justify thecorrectness of their interpretation. I cannot but help see these diverse attempts as up yas
as there are many different personalities, it is only fitting that there be many diverse
ways of achieving the highest goal,m o k a
. I suspect that one cannot clinically andobjectively determine the superiority of any one approach over the rest. One tends
naturally to choose the approach that fits best within one's ideology and predilections,whether due to ones environment or ones past karma as the case may be. If one prefers
to relate to "supreme perfection" personified, perhaps the approach via bhakti will seem"best" with as much or as little non-duality as one is willing to tolerate providing a reason
54See Dasgupta, pp.382-3, Chaudhuri (1981), pp. 54-6, and Brockington, pp.165-6 for historical
background.55
Chaudhuri (1981), pp.366-41756
And, as far as I know, it conveniently does not match my original criterion of having a Brahmas tra
bh ya!57
George Bosworth Burch in his introduction to Bhattacharyya (1976), p.2.
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
15/17
PREM PAHLAJRAI 15
for the variance from strict dvaita through bhed
bheda to advaita qualified in one formor another. But if one is more partial to "pure" reason alone, unencumbered by emotion,
then the uncompromising non-duality of a k a r a ' s advaita might appeal.
Ultimately though, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, or as a commentator onthe works of Madhva, Vy
sat
rtha says:
n a h k s u l e h a n e n a i v a j t a i k s u r a s o b h a v e t .
n a c e k s u d a n d a m n i s p d y a l a b d h o n e k s u r a s o b h a v e t .58
"By merely licking the outer surface of sugarcane, one can't taste and enjoy its
sweetness; Without squeezing it between the teeth, one cannot enjoy the flavor ofthe sugarcane."
It is only through praxis, through applying these philosophies to one's own life, that
one can determine if any of these schools deliver the goods on moka. That there has
been and continues to be healthy debate between the proponents of these various schoolsserves to indicate that each seeker is trying to test the efficacy of their avowed doctrine
against others. That these debates continue to this date without any resoundinglyconclusive victory on the part of any given school may suggest that in their own fashion
these diverse schools are efficacious suited to the individual practitioners' propensitiesand predilections, and that there may be more than just one way to attaining moksa.
58Sharma, p.xi
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
16/17
16 2003ASIAN STUDIES GRADUATE STUDENT COLLOQUIUM
References
Apte, Vasudeo Mahadeo (1960),Brahma-Stra Sh
nkara-Bh
shya. Bombay: Popular
Book Depot.
Ayyangar, M.B.Narasimha, trans. (1979), Ved
ntas
ra of Bhagvad R
m
nuja. Adyar
Library and Research Center.
Bhattacharyya, Krishna Chandra (1975), Search for the Absolute in Neo-Vedanta. ed.George B. Burch. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Brockington, J. L. (1996), The Sacred Thread: Hinduism in its Continuity and Diversity.Edinburgh University Press.
Chaudhuri, Roma (1962),Doctrine of Srikantha (and other Monotheistic Schools of the
Vednta) Vol I. Calcutta: Pracyavani.
Chaudhuri, Roma (1972), Ten Schools of the Ved nta: Part I (Five Schools). Calcutta:
Rabindra Bharati University.
Chaudhuri, Roma (1975), Ten Schools of the Ved
nta: Part II (Further reflections of the
Five Schools of the Vednta). Calcutta: Rabindra Bharati University.
Chaudhuri, Roma (1981), Ten Schools of the Vednta: Part III (Five Remaining Schools,
Together with the Unique School of Swami Vivekananda). Calcutta: Rabindra
Bharati University.
Dasguta, Surendranath (1922),A History of Indian Philosophy, v.1-5. Delhi: Motilal
Banarsidass.
Deutsch, Elliot (1973),Advaita Ved
nta: A Philosophical Reconstruction. Honolulu:
University of Hawaii Press.
Hiriyanna, M. (1996),Esseentials of Indian Philosophy. London: Diamond Books.
Karmarkar, Raghunath Damodar, ed. (1959), r b h s y a
of R
m
nuja, Part I:C a t u h s t r
.University of Poona.
Khanna, A. B. (1998),Bhskar
c
rya (A Study with Special Reference to his
Brahmas tra-bh ya). Delhi: Amar Granth Publications.Malkovsky, Bradley J. (2001), The Role of Divine Grace in the Soteriology of
a
kar
c
rya. Leiden: Brill.
Marfatia, Mrudula I. (1967), The Philosophy of Vallabh c rya. Delhi: MunshiramManoharlal.
Potter, Karl H. (1981),Encyclopediaof Indian Philosophies, v.3: Advaita Ved
nta up to
a
kara and His Pupils. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Potter, Karl H. (1999), Presuppositions of India's Philosophies. Delhi: Motilal
Banarsidass.
Rao, C. Hayavadana, (1936) The
r
kara Bh
shya being the Vir
saiva Commentary on
the Ved
nta-Stras by Sr
pati. Vol. I Introduction. Bangalore Press.
Reddington, James D. (1983) Vallabh c rya on The Love Games of K a . D e l h i :
M o t i l a l B a n a r s i d a s s .
Sastri, Shri Anant Krishna (1995)Brahmastra-
k a r a b h s h y a m with Nine
Commentaries, v. 1. Delhi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan.
Shah, Jethalal G. (1969) Shri Vallabhacharya: His Philosophy and Religion. Nadiad:
Pushtimargiya Pustakalaya.
-
8/3/2019 Different Type of Vedanthas
17/17
PREM PAHLAJRAI 17
Sharma, B.N.K, (1971) The Brahmastras and their Principle Commentaries (A Critical
Exposition) Vol. I. Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
Tapasy
nanda, Sv
mi (1990)Bhakti Schools of Ved
nta (Lives and Philosophies of
R
m
nuja, Nimb
rka, Madhva, Vallabha and Caitanya). Mylapore: SriRamakrishna Math.
Torwesten, Hans (1985) Vedanta, Heart of Hinduism. New York: Grove Press.