diffusion physics

47

Upload: wren

Post on 17-Jan-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Diffusion Physics. H 2 O in the body is always in random motion due to thermal agitation. B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010. Diffusion Physics. Diffusion Coefficient is dependent on Temperature and Viscosity of Tissue. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Diffusion Physics
Page 2: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion Physics

H2O in the body is always in random motion due to thermal agitation

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 3: Diffusion Physics

- Diffusion Coefficient is dependent on Temperature and Viscosity of Tissue

Diffusion Coefficient (rate of motion)

Temperature

Size of MoleculeViscosity

Diffusion Physics

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 4: Diffusion Physics

-The “rate” of water motion is determine by a diffusion coefficient, “D”.

-Mean displacement of water molecules is related to “D” by Einstein’s equation:

TimeDiffusionCoefficient

MeanDisplacement

Diffusion Physics

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 5: Diffusion Physics

Detecting Diffusion with MRI - Intravoxel Incoherent Motion

Ellingson et al., Concepts in MR, 2008

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010 From: Ellingson, Concepts in MR, 2008

Page 6: Diffusion Physics

Detecting Diffusion with MRI - Intravoxel Incoherent Motion

Detected DWI Signal

MRI Signal w/o Diffusion Sensitivity

Variability inPhase of “Tagged” H2O Level of Diffusion Weighting

Diffusion Coefficient

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 7: Diffusion Physics

Intravoxel Incoherent vs Coherent Motion

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Diffusion Effects (Incoherent)

Flow Effects (Coherent) -- Phase Contrast (PC)-MRI

d = /3 radians Velocity

Page 8: Diffusion Physics

Proton on H2O

Image Voxel = t1

= t2

= t3

MR

I Sig

nal

Diffusion Time (or level of diffusion weighting)

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 9: Diffusion Physics

Factors that affect diffusion coefficient, D

Diffusion Time, t -Physical time between gradients used to “tag” H2O

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 10: Diffusion Physics

Factors that affect diffusion coefficient, D

Size of Compartment(s)- If we set a limit for r, then we observe an apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Physical Compartment Size

Expected Compartment Size

Page 11: Diffusion Physics

Factors that affect diffusion coefficient, D

Tortuosity of the Compartments- More tortuous paths look like slow diffusion

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Tortuosity

Actual Path

Expected Path

Page 12: Diffusion Physics

Factors that affect diffusion coefficient, D

Viscosity and Temperature

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Diffusion Coefficient (rate of motion) Temperature

Viscosity

Pure H2O CSF Infection (WBCs) Lymphoma

Page 13: Diffusion Physics

Factors that affect diffusion coefficient, D

-Diffusion Time, t -Physical time between gradients used to “tag” H2O

-Size of Compartment(s)- If we set a limit for r, then we observe an apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC

-Tortuosity of the Compartments- More tortuous paths look like slow diffusion

-Temperature

-Viscosity

*** We can only measure “ADC” because of all the factors that change “D”! ***

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 14: Diffusion Physics

Steps in Performing DWI

• DWI (isotropic):– Collect a DWI (b = 1000 or 500 s/mm2) dataset by applying motion probing gradients

in the x, y, and z-direction.• Make sure TE is low and TR is long to increase SNR• For higher resolution scans, use a lower b-value

– Collect a T2w dataset (b = 0 s/mm2)

– Collect a low b-value, flow nulled dataset (b = 50 s/mm2)

– Average DWIs from 3 directions

– Calculate ADC

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

For b-values < 1000

Page 15: Diffusion Physics

DWI vs. ADC

• DWI– Images collected during application of a “diffusion sensitizing gradient”

– Contains T1, T2, and ADC effects

– “Restricted diffusion”, long T2, and short T1 all influence DWIs

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

b = 1000

From: Taouli, Radiology, 2010

b = 750

Page 16: Diffusion Physics

DWI vs. ADC

• DWI– Influence of T2 in DWIs is known as “T2 shine through”

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

From: Taouli, Radiology, 2010

b = 500 ADC Map

Page 17: Diffusion Physics

DWI vs. ADC

• ADC– Quantitative

– Calculated from DWI and T2w (b = 0 or low b-value)

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

From: Taouli, Radiology, 2010

Page 18: Diffusion Physics

DWI vs. ADC

• ADC– Reflects diffusion magnitude

– Eliminates long T2 and short T1 effects

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

From: Taouli, Radiology, 2010

Page 19: Diffusion Physics

DWI vs. ADC

• DWI– Influence of T2 in DWIs is known as “T2 shine through”

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

From: Taouli, Radiology, 2010

b = 500 ADC Map

Page 20: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

Isotropic Diffusion Anisotropic Diffusion

From: Ellingson, Concepts in MR, 2008

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 21: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Directional Encoding

6 directions (min) 15 directions

25 directions 41 directions

Page 22: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

The Diffusion Tensor:

Page 23: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Isotropic Diffusion

1 = 2 = 3

Anisotropic Diffusion

1 > 2, 3

From Ellingson, Concepts in MR, 2008

Page 24: Diffusion Physics

Fractional Anisotropy (FA)

Isotropic Anisotropic

FA = 0 FA = 1

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 25: Diffusion Physics

DTI Tractography

• In the CNS and MSK, lADC is parallel to axon orientation

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 26: Diffusion Physics

DTI Tractography

• In the CNS, lADC is parallel to axon orientation

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 27: Diffusion Physics

DTI Tractography

• In the MSK, lADC is parallel to muscle fiber orientation

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

From: University of Rochester

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 28: Diffusion Physics

DTI Tractography

• In the heart, lADC is also parallel to muscle fiber orientation

From: University of Oxford

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

From: Eindhoven University of Technology

Page 29: Diffusion Physics

DTI Tractography

• Spinal Cord Injury

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

From Ellingson, Neurosurgery:Spine, 2010

Page 30: Diffusion Physics

Steps in Performing DTI

• DTI (6 directions):– Collect a DWI (b = 1000 or 500 s/mm2) along 6 non-collinear directions

– Collect a T2w dataset (b = 0 s/mm2)

– Calculate Diffusion Tensor:

• Calculate D in 6 different directions

• Set up the encoding matrix

• Define Tensors

• Solve Tensor Equations

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 31: Diffusion Physics

Applications of Diffusion MRIin the Abdomen

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 32: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Liver

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Page 33: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Liver

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

• Common pulse sequences– Single-shot spin-echo (SE) echoplanar with fat saturation

• With breathhold (20-30 seconds; sensitivity for lesion detection = 84.3%Parikh, 2008)– Need thicker slices (8-10 mm) for good SNR and good liver coverage

• Resp. gated (3-6 min; sensitivity for lesion detection = 93.7%Parikh, 2008)– Thinner slices can be used (5 mm)

– Better image quality, SNR and ADC quantificationTaouli, 2009

Page 34: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Liver

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

• Common pulse sequences– Single-shot spin-echo (SE) echoplanar with fat saturation

• With breathhold (20-30 seconds; sensitivity for lesion detection = 84.3%Parikh, 2008)– Need thicker slices (8-10 mm) for good SNR and good liver coverage

• Resp. gated (3-6 min; sensitivity for lesion detection = 93.7%Parikh, 2008)– Thinner slices can be used (5 mm)

– Better image quality, SNR and ADC quantificationTaouli, 2009

• Common b-values– b = 0 image (no diffusion weighting…essentially a “poor man’s” T2w image)

Page 35: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Liver

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

• Common pulse sequences– Single-shot spin-echo (SE) echoplanar with fat saturation

• With breathhold (20-30 seconds; sensitivity for lesion detection = 84.3%Parikh, 2008)– Need thicker slices (8-10 mm) for good SNR and good liver coverage

• Resp. gated (3-6 min; sensitivity for lesion detection = 93.7%Parikh, 2008)– Thinner slices can be used (5 mm)

– Better image quality, SNR and ADC quantificationTaouli, 2009

• Common b-values– b = 0 image (baseline with no diffusion weighting…essentially a “poor man’s” T2w

image

– Low b-value (b < 150 s/mm2) “Flow Nulled”• Nulls the intrahepatic vascular signal

• Allows for better detection of focal liver lesions(van den Bos, 2008; Parikh, 2008; Okada, 1998; Hussain, 2005)

~2% change in ADC

Page 36: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Liver

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

• Common pulse sequences– Single-shot spin-echo (SE) echoplanar with fat saturation

• With breathhold (20-30 seconds; sensitivity for lesion detection = 84.3%Parikh, 2008)– Need thicker slices (8-10 mm) for good SNR and good liver coverage

• Resp. gated (3-6 min; sensitivity for lesion detection = 93.7%Parikh, 2008)– Thinner slices can be used (5 mm)

– Better image quality, SNR and ADC quantificationTaouli, 2009

• Common b-values– b = 0 image (baseline with no diffusion weighting…essentially a “poor man’s” T2w

image

– Low b-value (b < 150 s/mm2) “Flow Nulled”• Nulls the intrahepatic vascular signal

• Allows for better detection of focal liver lesions(van den Bos, 2008; Parikh, 2008; Okada, 1998; Hussain, 2005)

– High b-value (500 < b < 1000 s/mm2)• Useful for focal liver lesion characterization (Taouli, 2003; Kim, 1999)

Page 37: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Liver

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

• Visual liver lesion characterization with DWI

From: Taouli, Radiology, 2010

Page 38: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Liver

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

• Visual liver lesion characterization with DWI

From: Taouli, Radiology, 2010

b = 500 ADC

From: Xu, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2010

Page 39: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Liver

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

• Visual liver lesion characterization with DWI

From: Xu, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2010

- DWI has higher specificity than CE

Page 40: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Liver

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

From: Colagrande, Radiol Med, 2006

Cirrhotic Liver -- ADCLiver Cysts -- ADCAngioma -- ADCFNH -- ADCHepatocarcimoma -- ADC (mixed results)Metastasis -- ADC (mixed results)

Page 41: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Kidneys

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Directionality -- DTI?

Page 42: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Kidneys

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Directionality -- DTI?

From: Kido, Acta Radiol, 2010

Fractional Anisotropy (DTI)

Page 43: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Kidneys

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

From: Colagrande, Radiol Med, 2006

b = 0

b = 500

ADC

From: Kido, Acta Radiol, 2010

From: Kilickesmez, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2009

Page 44: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Kidneys

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Renal Fibrosis

Animal Model -- From: Togao, Radiology, 2010

Page 45: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Kidneys

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

Renal Cell Carcinoma

From: Kilickesmez, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2009

Contrast-Enhanced T1 b = 1000 ADC

Page 46: Diffusion Physics

Diffusion MR Imagingof the Kidneys

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010

From: Kilickesmez, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2009

Page 47: Diffusion Physics

Summary• Diffusion MRI is an MR technique that can quantify the magnitude of H20

diffusivity within tissues– Microstructural information

• ADC calculated from diffusion MR images is influenced by: – Cellularity– Tissue viscosity and temperature– Diffusion Time– Compartment Size (cell size and shape)– Tortuosity of environment

• DTI is useful for directionality of diffusion restrictions– CNS, MSK, Kidney

• DWI/ADC maps can be used to characterize many pathologies of the abdomen– Liver and Kidney pathologies are most common abdominal diffusion MR studies

B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2010