digital enterprise research institute the state of the art in ......this presentation i. background...

27
Digital Enterprise Research Institute Review and Alignment of Tag Ontologies , Alexandre Passant, John G. Brelsin, Simon Scerri and Stefan Decker © Copyright 2008 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. www.deri.org The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies Haklae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker and Honggee Kim 1 DC 2008 Berlin, Germany, September 25th , 2008

Upload: others

Post on 05-Mar-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

Digital Enterprise Research Institute

Review and Alignment of Tag Ontologies for Semantically-Linked Data in Collaborative Tagging Spaces

Hak-Lae Kim, Alexandre Passant, John G. Brelsin, Simon Scerri and Stefan Decker

ICSC, San Fransisco, August 8, 2008

IPEEC 2008 Daejeon, Korea/ 30th June 2008

© Copyright 2008 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved.

www.deri.org

The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies

Haklae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker and Honggee Kim

1

DC 2008 Berlin, Germany, September 25th , 2008

Page 2: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

This Presentation

I. Background

II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies

III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

Page 3: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

I. Background

Page 4: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

HOW MANY MODERN SOCIAL SITES DO NOT SUPPORT TAGGING?

Page 5: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Easy-to-use

Created by user participation

Collective ‘intelligence’

Emergent semantics

Page 6: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies

Page 7: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

• Core Concepts – Tag: a word or phrase that is recognisable

by people and computers

– Resource: a thing to be tagged, identifiable by a URI or a similar naming service

– Tagger: someone/thing doing the tagging, e.g. user of an application

Page 8: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

TAGGING We tag a specific resource with keywords

Page 9: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Tagging := (user, tag, resource)

Page 10: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

‘Picture Credit: Maarten Janssen, 2006’

Personal tagging (non-social)

Folksonomies: collaborative tagging

Social interaction across different systems?

Page 11: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Tagging := (user, tag, resource)*

Folksonomy := (Tag Set, User Group, Source, Tagging, Occurrences )

Page 12: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

CURRENTLY

We don’t know the relationships

User assigns a Tag to a Resource in a specific system.

System

Tagging

No standard to enable reuse among different systems

Page 13: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

STRUCTURE The structure of Tagging elements (People, Tags, Resources, ...) can be defined in human-readable AND machine-processable ways.

<tag:name> bear

</tag:name>

Page 14: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

MEANING The MEANING of Tagging elements (People, Tags, Resources, ...) can also be defined in a machine-processable way.

bear Bear

toy

BEAR bears

Page 15: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

ONTOLOGIES

Enable:

• Increased Knowledge Representation Sophistication

• Machine Processable Representation

• Facilitation of Knowledge Exchange

Page 16: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Allow us to represent tagging elements and their relationships at a semantic level.

“A little semantics goes a LONG way”

System

Tagging

:hasTagging

TAG ONTOLOGIES

Page 17: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

Page 18: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Selected Tag Ontologies

Ontology URL Update Applications

Gruber - - -

Newman http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/tags/ Nov ’05 http://revyu.com

Knerr http://code.google.com/p/tagont/ Jan ’07 -

Echarte http://eslomas.com/tagontology-1.owl ’07 -

SCOT http://scot-project.org Jun ’08 http://int.ere.st http://relaxseo.com

http://openlinksw.com MOAT http://moat-project.org Feb ’08 http://openlinksw.com

lord.info

NAO http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/nao/ Aug ‘07 Nepomuk

Page 19: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Ontology Class Comparison (selection)

Model Resource Tag Tagging User Group Source

Gruber Object Tag Tagging Tagger Source

Newman rdfs:Resource :Tag :Tagging foaf:Agent

Knerr rdfs:Resource :Tag :Tagging :Tagger foaf:Group :ServiceDomain

Echarte :Resource :Tag :Annotation :User :Source

SCOT sioc:Item :Tag tags:Tagging sioc:User sioc:Usergroup sioc:Site

MOAT rdfs:Resource tag:Tag tags:Tagging foaf:Agent

NAO rdfs:Resource :Tag :Party

Page 20: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Ontology Property Comparison (selection)

Resource User Tag

Resource tags:taggedWithTag scot:hasTag nao:hasTag

User

Tag

tags: isTagOf scot:tagOf nao:isTagFor ec:hasRelatedResource

scot:usedBy nao:creator

tags:equivalentTag tags:relatedTag scot:aggregatedTag scot:spellingVariant scot:delimited tagont:sameTag ec:hasTag

Table 4. Object Type Properties. The table shows relationships between core concepts, interpreted as domain (row) – property – range (column)

Page 21: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Inclinations and Representation Levels of Selected Ontologies

Folksonomy Feature Support

Tagging Activity Feature Support

Page 22: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

MOAT (Meaning Of A Tag)

Page 23: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watch

moat:tagMeaning moat:tagMeaning

Page 24: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

SCOT (Social Semantic Cloud of Tags)

Page 25: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Linking among Tag Ontologies

Page 26: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Folksonomies: Linking Tag Clouds

Page 27: Digital Enterprise Research Institute The State of the Art in ......This Presentation I. Background II. Tagging Models and Tag Ontologies III. Comparison of Existing Tag Ontologies

DERI, NUI Galway

Conclusion

Tagging := (User, Tag, Resource)

Folksonomy := (Users, Tags, Source, Tagging*, Occurrences*)

• Existing Tag Ontologies do not represent Collaborative Tagging well enough on their own.

• SCOT + MOAT + additional vocabularies (SIOC, FOAF, DC, etc.) provide sufficient representation for Collaborative Tagging & Folksonomies

• Thus, Tag Ontologies provide the possibility for machine-processable representations that can be shared across social tagging systems.