digoxin use and toxicity
DESCRIPTION
Digoxin use and toxicity. TJ O’Neill 2/5/10. Historical Use of Digoxin. Romans used a non- Digoxin cardiac glycoside derived from sea onion Used sporadically in Middle Ages but popularized in 18 th century Used for dropsy and recognized to decrease edema and slow HR - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
DIGOXIN USE AND TOXICITY
TJ O’Neill 2/5/10
Historical Use of Digoxin Romans used a non-
Digoxin cardiac glycoside derived from sea onion
Used sporadically in Middle Ages but popularized in 18th century
Used for dropsy and recognized to decrease edema and slow HR
Withering in 1785 published an account of 156 patients sucessfully treated including Erasmus Darwin
William Withering
Foxglove
16- 3
75-60
Digoxin Mechanism of Action Inhibits Cardiac isoform of Na/K
ATPase which indirectly increases intracellular Ca concentration Increased cardiac output in low
output states without increased oxygen consumption
Decreases PCWP Improves baroreceptor sensitivity in
the carotid which may decrease RAAS activation
Increases AV node refractory period by increasing vagal tone
Evidence for Digoxin In a series of trials beginning in 1988 Digoxin
reduced hospitalization but no effect on mortality. Largest was Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG)
7788 pts radomized to digoxin vs placebo. No difference in mortality but 25% reduction in
hospital admissions
Subgroup analysis showed significant reduction in deaths attributed to “worsening CHF” and almost identical increase in “cardiac death, not due to CHF”
Digoxin Toxicity Incidence decreasing 2610 reported cases in
2006 compared to 10K for Ca channel blocker and 18K beta blocker toxicity cases
However there were 22 deaths compared to 13 and 4 for CCB and BB during the same year
Increased incidence in elderly as well as decreased renal fxn
Digoxin Toxicity Cardiac disturbances GI symptoms
Anorexia, N/V/D, abdominal pain CNS effects
Weakness, blurred vision, halos around light In severe cases can cause hyper K Can be difficult to detect clinically
In Dig trial incidence of “Digoxin toxicity” was 11.9% in Digoxin group and 7.9% in placebo group
Conduction Defects in Digoxin Toxicity
Slows nodal conduction while increasing automaticity
More likely in patients w/ CAD, particularly active ischemia and are potentiated by low Mg, K
Downward slurring of ST Heart block VT/VT -PAT w/ Block -Bidirectional VT
Dali’s Mustache
Pharmacokinetics/dynamics Half life 36-48 hours in the case of normal renal function (levels
stabilize 7 days after dose change Large reservoir in skeletal muscle Clearance is primarily renal, but some hepatic metabolism as
well Level should be checked at least 8 hours after dose and may
not reflect tissue concentrations if recent dose change.
Level increased by several medications Verapamil, Diltiazem, amiodarone, itraconazole- decreased clearance Erythromycin, clarithromycin, tetracycline- decreased gut flora
metabolism Toxicity can be increased by any medication decreasing serum K or
potentially affecting renal fxn
Increased level (probably >2.5 but possibly less) + relevant clinical scenario (usually conduction distrubance) = TOXICITY
Treatment If early after intentional overdose, can give activated
charcoal Bradycardia
If asymptomatic keep serum K at least 4.0 (or higher) Potassium will affect affinity for Na/K pump
Symptomatic- Atropine, pacing Digibind (Humanized sheep Mab)
Symptomatic bradycardia not responsive to Atropine Malignant arrhythmia (particularly in the setting of hyperkalemia) Hyperkalemia Important to give adequate dose initially as digoxin levels will be
affected for up to 2 weeks
Plasmapheresis will prevent rebound effect Neither HD nor PD will decrease serum concentation
Prevention Err on the lower end of dosing, as there is no
clear lower end of efficacy. The DIG trial dose of 0.25mg daily is probably not appropriate initial dose for anyone.
Closely monitor drug levels, especially if used with Amio, non DHP CCB, or macrolides
Be particularly cautious following recent hospital discharge
References Eichhorn EJ et al. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 44 (4):
251-266, 2002. Shahbudin H et al. Circulation; 109: 2942-6, 2004 Hood WB et al. J Cardiac Failure. 10 (2): 155-164,
2004