dirty words, pig latin, and the structure of languagedingo.sbs.arizona.edu/~hammond/disting.pdf ·...

67
Dirty Words, Pig Latin, and the Structure of Language Michael Hammond Dept. of Linguistics, U. of Arizona Dirty Words/Hammond – p.1/24

Upload: phamngoc

Post on 06-Feb-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Dirty Words, Pig Latin, and the Structure ofLanguage

Michael Hammond

Dept. of Linguistics, U. of Arizona

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.1/24

What do linguists do?

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.2/24

What do linguists do?

� We want to understand people.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.2/24

What do linguists do?

� We want to understand people.

� What makes people unique?

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.2/24

What do linguists do?

� We want to understand people.

� What makes people unique? Our minds

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.2/24

What do linguists do?

� We want to understand people.

� What makes people unique? Our minds

� What makes our minds unique?

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.2/24

What do linguists do?

� We want to understand people.

� What makes people unique? Our minds

� What makes our minds unique? Language

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.2/24

Ernie

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.3/24

Ernie

Birds, bees, dogs, etc. all “communicate”

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.3/24

Ernie

Birds, bees, dogs, etc. all “communicate”. . . but is it language?

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.3/24

Whatdon’t linguists do?

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.4/24

Whatdon’t linguists do?

� We don’t tell people how they should talk.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.4/24

Whatdon’t linguists do?

� We don’t tell people how they should talk.

� We don’t tell people what the rules oflanguage should be.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.4/24

Whatdon’t linguists do?

� We don’t tell people how they should talk.

� We don’t tell people what the rules oflanguage should be.

� . . . and we do not necessarily speak a lot oflanguages.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.4/24

So whatdo linguists do?

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.5/24

So whatdo linguists do?

� We look at how languages work and how theyvary.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.5/24

So whatdo linguists do?

We look at how languages work and how theyvary.

These tell us how the mind works.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.5/24

So whatdo linguists do?

We look at how languages work and how theyvary.

These tell us how the mind works.

In particular that there is a rich invisiblestructure underlying language that revealsitself in different ways

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.5/24

So whatdo linguists do?

� We look at how languages work and how theyvary.

� These tell us how the mind works.

� In particular that there is a rich invisiblestructure underlying language that revealsitself in different ways, even in languagegames and dirty words.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.5/24

High tech

Time (s)0 2.36898

0

5000

Fre

qu

en

cy (

Hz)

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.6/24

High tech

Time (s)0 2.36898

0

5000

Fre

qu

en

cy (

Hz)

“Ernie, Ernie, bo-bernie. . . Dirty Words/Hammond – p.6/24

Low tech?

Two language systems that tell us about that“invisible” structure:

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.7/24

Low tech?

Two language systems that tell us about that“invisible” structure:

� the “Name Game”

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.7/24

Low tech?

Two language systems that tell us about that“invisible” structure:

the “Name Game”

Expletive Infixation

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.7/24

The “Name Game”

Ernie

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.8/24

The “Name Game”

Ernie, Ernie, bo-Bernie,

Banana, fana, fo-Fernie,

Me, my, mo-Mernie,

Er-nie.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.8/24

Another name

Jonah

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.9/24

Another name

Jonah, Jonah, bo-bonah,

Banana, fana, fo-Fonah,

Me, my, mo-Monah,

Jo-nah.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.9/24

How to play

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.10/24

How to play

� Replace any word-initial consonants with [b],[f], and [m].

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.10/24

How to play

� Replace any word-initial consonants with [b],[f], and [m].

� If there’s no word-initial consonant:Ernie/Anna bernie/banna

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.10/24

How to play

� Replace any word-initial consonants with [b],[f], and [m].

� If there’s no word-initial consonant:Ernie/Anna bernie/banna

� If there’s just one consonant, replace it:Todd/Bonnie bodd/bonnie

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.10/24

More than one consonant

If there’s more than one consonant, replace themall:

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.11/24

More than one consonant

If there’s more than one consonant, replace themall:Steve/Stella beve/bellaBrad/Brenda bad/bendaDwight/Gwen bight/benStrom/Sprague bom/bag

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.11/24

More than one consonant

If there’s more than one consonant, replace themall:Steve/Stella beve/bellaBrad/Brenda bad/bendaDwight/Gwen bight/benStrom/Sprague bom/bag

But:Beula/Buford b[y]eula/b[y]uford

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.11/24

Names that work fine

one syllable two syllables three syllablesBob Joseph ChrıstopherAnne Robert MadelineStrom Jonah CatherineEd Mıchael Sergio

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.12/24

Stress matters

one syllable two syllables three syllablesBób Jóseph ChrístopherÁnne Róbert MádelineStróm Jónah CátherineÉd Míchael Sérgio

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.13/24

Names that don’t work!

� Two syllables (final stress): Daniélle

� Three syllables (second syllable stress):Amánda

� Three syllables (third syllable stress):Adriénne

� Four syllables+ (any stress): Agamémnon,Ábernathy

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.14/24

Names that don’t work!

� Two syllables (final stress): Daniélle (cf.Dániel)

� Three syllables (second syllable stress):Amánda (cf. Ágatha)

� Three syllables (third syllable stress):Adriénne (cf. Ádrian)

� Four syllables+ (any stress): Agamémnon,Ábernathy

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.14/24

The generalization

The game can be played with names that arecomposed of a “stressed” syllable followed by atmost two (unstressed) syllables.

yes noBób DaniélleJóseph AmándaChrístopher Adriénne

AgamémnonÁbernathy

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.15/24

The generalization

The game can be played with names that arecomposed of a “stressed” syllable followed by atmost two (unstressed) syllables.

yes noBób DaniélleJóseph AmándaChrístopher Adriénne

AgamémnonÁbernathy

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.15/24

Don’t be offended!

Minnesota

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.16/24

Don’t be offended!

Minnesota

Minne–f*–sota

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.16/24

Don’t be offended!

Minnesota

Minne–f*–sotaNot: *Mi(n)–f*–nesotaNot: *Minneso–f*–ta

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.16/24

Some more

Tennessee

Montana

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.17/24

Some more

Tennessee

Tenne–f*–ssee

Montana

Mon–f*–tana

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.17/24

Some more

Tennessee

Tenne–f*–sseeNot: *Te(n)–f*–nessee

Montana

Mon–f*–tanaNot: *Monta–f*–na

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.17/24

Multiple options

Timbuktu

Apalachicola

Alamagordo

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.18/24

Multiple options

Timbuktu

Tim–f*–buktu and Timbuk–f*–tu

Apalachicola

Apa–f*–lachicola and Apalachi–f*–cola

Alamagordo

Ala–f*–magordo and Alama–f*–gordo

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.18/24

Some words don’t work at all!

These work but these don’tMınne–sota MissouriTenne–ssee FloridaMon–tana GeorgiaTım–buk–tu ConnecticutApa–lachi–colaAla–ma–gordo

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.19/24

Stress patterns

These work but these don’tMìnne–sóta MissóuriTènne–ssée FlóridaMòn–tána GeórgiaTìm–bùk–tú ConnécticutÀpa–làchi–cólaÀla–ma–górdo

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.20/24

What’s the pattern?

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.21/24

What’s the pattern?

� The expletive must have at least one stressedsyllable on either side.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.21/24

What’s the pattern?

� The expletive must have at least one stressedsyllable on either side.

� If there’s one or more stressless syllables inbetween, at least one of those must be to theleft of the infix.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.21/24

The trochaic foot

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.22/24

The trochaic foot

� There is an invisible grouping of syllables thatcontrols the “Name Game” and ExpletiveInfixation.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.22/24

The trochaic foot

� There is an invisible grouping of syllables thatcontrols the “Name Game” and ExpletiveInfixation.

� This invisible grouping includes a singlestressed syllable and up to two followingstressless syllables.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.22/24

The trochaic foot

� There is an invisible grouping of syllables thatcontrols the “Name Game” and ExpletiveInfixation.

� This invisible grouping includes a singlestressed syllable and up to two followingstressless syllables.

� This is called the trochaic foot.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.22/24

Confirmation

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.23/24

Confirmation

� Nicknames tend to be of this form as well,e.g. Bóbbie, Cáthy, Jóey, etc.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.23/24

Confirmation

� Nicknames tend to be of this form as well,e.g. Bóbbie, Cáthy, Jóey, etc.

� Children tend to reduce longer words to justthis pattern as well, e.g. banána ’nána(Gerken, Carter).

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.23/24

Conclusions

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.24/24

Conclusions

� There are hidden structures in language.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.24/24

Conclusions

� There are hidden structures in language.

� These can only be detected by looking at howlanguage works in various contexts.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.24/24

Conclusions

� There are hidden structures in language.

� These can only be detected by looking at howlanguage works in various contexts.

� Here a language game and dirty wordsconverge on the same hidden structure.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.24/24

Conclusions

� There are hidden structures in language.

� These can only be detected by looking at howlanguage works in various contexts.

� Here a language game and dirty wordsconverge on the same hidden structure.

� People don’t learn how to play this game orinsert the expletive in school.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.24/24

Conclusions

� There are hidden structures in language.

� These can only be detected by looking at howlanguage works in various contexts.

� Here a language game and dirty wordsconverge on the same hidden structure.

� People don’t learn how to play this game orinsert the expletive in school.

� Poetry and literature may be satisfying toread, but sometimes the most revealinglanguage is of a very different sort.

Dirty Words/Hammond – p.24/24