discussion on some aspects of compositional simulation

100

Upload: yoleidacr

Post on 12-Jan-2016

15 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Simulación composicional

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 2: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 3: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

WHAT IS SIMULATION?WHAT IS SIMULATION? a process of inferringthe behaviour of a hcreservoir from the

performance of a modela model

CoreScaled Down Scaled Down

Physical ModelPhysical Model

p

p

pp

rp

p

pp

rp

pp

rp

BB

kk

B

kk

B

kk

pS

t=

zz

+yy

+xx

Mathematical ModelMathematical Model

Engineering/Simulation Engineering/Simulation ModelModel

Page 4: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

p

p

pp

rp

p

pp

rp

pp

rp

BB

kk

B

kk

B

kk

pS

t=

zz

+yy

+xx

Grid BlockGrid Block(~100mx100mx10m)(~100mx100mx10m)

Permeability, k Permeability, k Porosity, Porosity, Thickness, hThickness, hElevation, dElevation, d Saturation, SSaturation, S Pressure, pPressure, pCompressibility, c Compressibility, c Fluid PVTFluid PVT RelPerms, kRelPerms, krr

Well data, q, pWell data, q, p

Reservoir Parametersto be assigned

Page 5: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Geologyand

Geophysics

Petro-physics

RCA+SCAL

Geo- Mechanics

WellTests

TracerTesting

DataDataAcquisitionAcquisition

Data Processing Data Processing and Integrationand IntegrationReservoir ModelReservoir Model

Up-scaling/Downscaling

SimulationSimulationModelModel

Up-scaling

Usually Millions of Grid Blocks

CORE SCALECORE SCALE

Validation/Validation/History MatchHistory Match

Technical Scenario

Economical Scenario

Reservoir Study

Page 6: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

PRE-SIMULATION ERAPRE-SIMULATION ERA

Log AnalystGeologist

ProductionAnalyst

Geo-physicist

Reserv.Eng.

SurfaceFacilityDesign

Interaction of peopleIntegration of expertise

Petroleum ReservoirPetroleum ReservoirPerformance EvaluationPerformance Evaluation

viavia

Page 7: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

POST-SIMULATION ERAPOST-SIMULATION ERA

Log Analyst

Geologist

Production

Analyst

Geo-physicis

t

Reserv.Eng.

Surface

FacilityDesign

Surface FacilityDesign

Reserv.Eng.

Geologist Geo-

physicist

Production

Analyst

Log Analyst

Page 8: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

CLASSIFICATION OF SIMULATORS BASED ON FLUID DESCRIPTION

•Black Oil Simulators

•Compositional Simulators.

Page 9: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Black Oil Simulators:

•These types of simulators treat hydrocarbons as two components; gas and oil.

•They are applicable to dissolved gas, medium gravity (~20-35o API) oil-bearing reservoirs under moderate reservoir pressures (2000-6000 psi) and temperatures (200-280oF).

•They can be applied to almost all conventional water flooding simulation studies.

Page 10: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Black Oil Simulators:

•If the oil formation factor is less than two, they can safely be applied to solution-gas drive, gas cap extension or gas injection studies.

•Black oil simulators can also be used for some cases where the formation volume factor is greater than 2.

That is possible if oil and gas formation volume factors, gas in solution, and oil and gas viscosity as a function of pressure can be determined accurately by calculation or experiment.

Page 11: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

The underlying assumptions of Black Oil Models can be summarized as follows:

•The reservoir system should be characterized adequately with three components, namely oil, water and gas.

•The formulation is based on the concept of a solution gas-oil ratio, by which the amount of gas dissolved in oil is represented merely as a function of pressure and temperature.

•The injected gas combines with reservoir oil, in the same way as in-place reservoir gas, disregarding the compositional differences between the gas phases.

Page 12: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

The defects of the black oil model can be summarized as follows:

•It assumes that the properties measured in the lab completely describe the behavior of the fluid system throughout the project life.

•Compositional variations are ignored.

Page 13: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Compositional Models

• This class of simulators has been in use since the late 1960's and became particularly important in the mid 1970's.

•In such models, a balance is kept of

all hydrocarbon component specified,

the distribution between vapor and liquid phases of component, and

the transfer from node to node of each phase and its associated components.

Page 14: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

the simulation method is capable of handling:

•Enhanced Oil Recovery by CO2 or enriched gas injection

•Natural depletion or injection of gases such as nitrogen or residue gas into gas condensate reservoirs

•Natural depletion or gas injection into volatile oil reservoirs

•Re-evaporation of residual oil by injecting residual gas

Page 15: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

compositional simulators are designed to handle the following two classes of process:

•Depletion and/or gas cycling of volatile oil and gas condensate reservoirs

•Multiple contact miscibility (MCM) by miscible flooding.

Page 16: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Advantages of Compositional Simulation

Can account for effects of

• Surface Tension and or Interfacial Tension (IFT)

– Especially the effect of composition on IFT

– The effect of IFT on residual oil saturation and on relative permeabilities.

Page 17: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Problems and Difficulties with Problems and Difficulties with Compositional SimulationCompositional Simulation

• When Calculations of phase composition is in plait - point region, difficulties occur.

– First: the K - values and physical property correlations as well as EOS are less accurate in plait point.

– Second: in the plait point region experimental data are lacking, thus it is difficult to tune the EOS in this region.

• Numerical dispersion.

Page 18: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Ternary Diagram

Plait Point: tie line length = 0

extension of critical tie line

tie lines connect liquidand vapor phases inequilibrium

Vapor Phase Composition: y

Liquid Phase Composition: x

100% methane

100% C4100% C12

40% C1, 50% C4, 10% C12

20% C1, 20% C4, 60% C12

z

Page 19: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Problems and Difficulties with Compositional Simulation

• Model viscous fingering– Complete mixing of fluids within a

grid block assumed. Approximations by Barker and Fayers - works but not correct.

• Computer Time Requirements.

Page 20: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Comparison of Black Oil and Compositional Models

Key Difference: PVT

Compositional: Flash = EOS

Black Oil: Table Vs. Pressure

Page 21: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Comparison of Black Oil and Compositional Models

Black Oil

(2 components, volatile oil)

Gas

Oil + Solution Gas (Rs)

Page 22: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Comparison of Black Oil and Compositional Models

Compositional

Components I =

(nc Components)

yi

123.nc

123.nc

Components I =

xi

V

L

Page 23: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Comparison of Black Oil and Compositional Models

B

B

Rf p

o

g

s

( ) Table Values

Assumes Composition of Gas and Oil Phases constant with Pressure and time

Black Oil

Page 24: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Comparison of Black Oil and Compositional Models

Assumes EOS represents fluids at all, T, P, Composition

),,,( ii

i

ii

yxTPfx

yK

Compositional

Table look-up or EOS Flash

Page 25: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Comparison of Black Oil and Compositional Models

Unknowns (3 Phase System)

3 variables per grid block

P

S

S

w

g

Black Oil

Page 26: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Comparison of Black Oil and Compositional Models

Unknowns ( 3 Phase System)

(Nc+2) variables per grid block

PSwzi, i = 1, .... nc (molar density)

Compositional

Page 27: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 28: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Nomenclaturez = elevation in vertical direction (l.c.)

zi = Feed mole fraction of component i (l.c.)

Z = Compressibility, Zl = compressibility of phase l

Zc critical compressibility (u.c.)

Ki = K-value (equilibrium ratio) of component i (u.c.)

kij = Binary interaction coefficient between components i and j (l.c.)

ko kg = Relative permeability of the oil and gas phases (l.c.)

Page 29: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Relationships

/NN=V n/N=Ny

/N=N=L n/N=Nx

+Vy=Lx z/N Nz

N=N NN

NN

iVyiiVViVi

LixiiLLiLi

iiiii

i

iVi

iL

ii

VL

Page 30: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Relationships

LNN

VNN

L

V

L V 1

1 i i i

iii yxz (EQ 38)

(EQ 37)

Page 31: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

The Continuity The Continuity EquationEquation

The The Equation Equation of Stateof State

The Equation The Equation of Flowof Flow

ConstitutiveConstitutiveEquationsEquations

Simulation Equations

Page 32: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

C o n t i n u u mD o m a in

R e p r e s e n t a t i v eE le m e n t a r yV o lu m e

V o lu m e

1

0

CONTINUUM CONCEPT and SCALECONTINUUM CONCEPT and SCALE

Page 33: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

xV zV

x

z

y

yV yy VV

xx VV yy VV zz VV

x

P=

x

P

0x

Lim

t=

z

V-

y

V-

x

V- zyx

Page 34: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

1-D Horizontal Flow

uk P

xx

3D - 1 Phase Flow with Gravity

uk

Pg

gc

where gc is a conversion constant, note z is positive down

Page 35: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Permeability Tensor

z

2

y

2

x

2

k

Cos+

k

Cos+

k

Cos=

k

1

P1

P2

k

Angle

x

Y

U

kv

Permeability is second rank symmetrictensor

zz zyzx

yz yyyx

xz xyxx

kk k

kk k

kkk

= [k]

where kxy = kyx, kxz = kzx and kyz = kzy.

Page 36: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

zz

yy

xx

k 0 0

0 k 0

0 0 k

SimplificationSimplification

If the principal axes of permeability coincides with the axes of the co-ordinates system, the cross terms disappear.

Page 37: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Figure FPM-4: Reference co-ordinatescompared with spatially varying principle

axes of permeability

Reference Co-ordinates

PermeabilityAxes

Page 38: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

General Compositional Component Balance

Balance on mass or moles of nc components subscript i (moles = mass/MW)

3 Phases

V (g)

L(o)

W

yi = mole fraction of component iin Vapor Phasexi = mole fraction of component i inLiquid (hydrocarbon Phase)

ci = mole fraction of component i in waterPhase

Note: for general treatment all components can dissolvein water phase

Page 39: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

General Compositional Component Balance

Component Balance - 1 - D, No sources or sinks for component (no elevation difference)

iggooiww

w

iw

wwgi

g

ggoi

o

oo

zSScSt

x

Pc

k

x

Py

k

x

Px

k

x

)

Where Zi = Total hydrocarbon (feed) mole fraction of component i

Page 40: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

General Compositional Component Balance

If we Have Nc components (index i) and 3 phases (index l)

Components Unknowns

3

3

33

3

4Nc

2

xi, yi, ci, zi

pl

sl

kl (rel. Perm.)

L,V

l

l

Need 4Nc + 17 Independent Relationshipsto solve this system

Page 41: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Relationships From

1. Differential equations

2. Conservation principles

3. PVT data

4. Relative permeability data

5. Phase equilibrium

6. Flash relationships

7. Capillary pressure

Page 42: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Relationships From

1. PDE for each component (Nc equations)

S S Sg o w

1 (1 equation)

mole fractions in each phase = 1

(3 equations)

x = 1

y = 1

c = 1

i

i

i

2.

Nc+4

Page 43: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Relationships From3. From PVT data

iww

igg

ioo

cTPf

yTPf

xTPf

,,

,,

,,

(3 equations)

iww

igg

io

cTPf

yTPf

xTPf

,,

,,

,,

(3 equations)

Nc+10

Page 44: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Relationships From

4. Relative Permeability Data (3 equations)

k f S S S

k f S S S

k f S S S

o g o w

g g o w

w g o w

, ,

, ,

, ,

Nc+13

Page 45: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Relationships From

L + V = 1 {molar fractions of liquid and vapor} (1 equation)

equations) (N ciii VyLxz

5. Phase Equilibrium - Flash - Thermodynamic principles give the distribution of a component between Liquid (L) and Vapor (V) phases

2Nc+14

Page 46: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Relationships From

g Vz K

V Ki i

ii

nc

1

1 10

1

(Flash, 1 equation)*

* To be discussed in Flash and EOS sections

6. Flash Equation can be developed frombasic principles

2Nc+15

Page 47: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Generalized Model

(2Nc equations)

,,,

,,

iowigo

igw

i

i

iiigwi

i

iiigoi

i

KK

K

c

x

cyPTfKc

y

yxPTfKx

y

6. Flash Relationships, continued

Not independent

4Nc+15

Page 48: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Generalized Model

7. Capillary Pressure (2 equations)

P P P f S S S

P P P f S S S

cgo g o g o w

cow o w g o w

, ,

, ,

Total 4Nc + 17 Equations

4Nc+17

Page 49: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Simplification for Most Compositional Models

Mole fractions of hydrocarbon components in the water are zero

c i wi 0 1, , cw

xw 0 0, yw

No water component dissolves in either the liquid (L) or vapor (V).

In the simplified model, phase behavior involves only the hydrocarbon components in the L and V phases.

Page 50: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

3-D, Nc components, 3 phases - simplified Model

Water component

wwwww

rww S

tq

kk

(EQ 39)

Page 51: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Differential Equation (PDE)

NumericalApproximation

Solve UsingA Computer

Objective [Model of our process]

“FINITE DIFFERENCE”

“A FORTRAN PROGRAM”

Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations

Page 52: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 53: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Specification of Relative Permeability for Compositional Simulators

•In the case of immiscible displacement processes, relative permeability curves show considerable curvature.

•However, for compositional studies, such as multiple contact miscibility, as the fluid approaches to the critical point, the interfacial tension approaches to zero causing:

residual gas and oil saturations to approach zero,relative permeability curves to approach straight line.

•Therefore, gas oil-relative permeability is no longer constant and a relationship must be found to govern this change.

Page 54: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Irre

duci

ble

Sat

urat

ion Res

idua

lS

atur

atio

nkro

krg

Page 55: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 56: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Definition - Surface Tension is the stress at the surface between a liquid and a vapor caused by differences between the molecular force in the vapor and those in the liquid and by the imbalance of these forces at the interface.

Surface tension generally expressed as a pressure difference in a capillary tube or capillary pressure

= surface tension (dynes/cm)

Know:

= contact angle between liquid and solid

r = radius of tube, cm

cc rg

P cos2

Surface Tension Effects

Page 57: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

• Parameter called Parachor is predicted from structure of molecules or computed for pure substances or for mixtures from surface - tension measurements

Surface Tension Effects

Page 58: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

.......

//

//

//

333

222

1114/1

VVLL

VVLL

VVLL

MdyMdxP

MdyMdxP

MdyMdxPWeinaug and Katz

Page 59: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Where

P = Parachor for any component of mixture

xi = mole fraction in liquid phase

dL = density of liquid phase, g/cc

ML = molecular weight, liquid phase

yi = mole fraction in vapor phase

dV = density of vapor phase, g/cc

MV = molecular weight, vapor phase

1,2,3 .... component number

in dynes/cm

Weinaug and Katz

Page 60: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 61: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

0

0

1000

400

300

200

100

400300200100

900

800

700

600

500

Molecular Weight

Parachors for hydrocarbons.(Katz, Monroe, and Trainer)

Par

acho

r

Crude Oil

n - Paraffin

Heptane plus

Gasoline

Surface Tension Effects

Page 62: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Surface Tension Effects Component Parachor

n-Pentane

n-Hexane

n-Heptanen-OctaneEthylene

AcetylenePropyleneHydrogen

Nitrogen

EthanePropaneIsobutanen-ButaneIsopentane

Methane 77.0

189.9

225.0

231.5

271.0

312.5

351.5100.1

88.6

139.9

34 approx.41 approx.

108.0

150.3181.5

Page 63: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 64: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 65: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 66: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 67: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

In compositional model can have

Oil

W

Gas

W

direct transition fromoil to gas from onetime step to another

t=t1+tt=t1

Treatment of Near Critical Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilities

Page 68: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Question: What should hydrocarbon relative permeability be?

rwrg1

rwro1

K and K :Δtt

K and K :t

Treatment of Near Critical Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilities

Page 69: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Temperature

Pre

ssur

eReservoir Temperature

Phase Envelopes

Tcrit

Gas

Tcrit

Oil

At t1 we have an oil, at t1 + dt we have a gas.

t1

t1 + dt

Treatment of Near Critical Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilities

Page 70: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Answer - There must be continuity between

hydrocarbon relative permeability Kro when

system is an oil, Krg when system is a gas, for

any Sw.

Treatment of Near Critical Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilities

Page 71: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Solution - Define the water - hydrocarbon rel. perm. Krh when have single phase HC system

Krh

Krh Kro as system oilKrh Krg as system gas

To set up interpolation - define pseudo-critical temp. Tcrit

(Li correlation)

compcc

compccc

crit

ZV

ZVT

T

Treatment of Near Critical Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilities

Page 72: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Then define: f = Tcrit / Tres

f = 1 res.temp = crit temp.

f > 1 for oil Tcrit > Tres

f < 1 for gas Tcrit < Tres

System completely oil when fo = 1.25

completely gas when fg = 0.75

Treatment of Near Critical Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilities

Page 73: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Define interpolating function

E= (f-fg) / (fo-fg) in region fg < f < fo

E = 0 or 1 outside range

0

.75 1.251

E

f

1

Treatment of Near Critical Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilities

Page 74: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Hydrocarbon - water rel. perm. defined

rgwrowrhw KEKEK 1Continuous User input

Krow Krgw

Treatment of Near Critical Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilities

Page 75: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

3 phases: oil, gas, water

(default Eclipse method)

owcwwcw

grgowrhwrg

gwcwwcw

orowwrhwro

SSSSSh

SKhShKK

SSSSSg

SKgSgKK

/ where

1

/ where

1

Treatment of Near Critical Oil and Gas Relative Permeabilities

Page 76: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 77: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Capillary Number Model

The CN has two effects on the gas and oil relative permeability

As CN increases

•Residual saturation reduces

•Relative permeability curve changes from user-specified (immiscible) to miscible curve (internally generated)

Page 78: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

jrvjjcj

jrvjcj

ggcj

PKKSN

orL

PKKN

or

vN

2/12

Three models the calculate CN for phase j (oil, gas)

= gas-oil surface tension

Capillary Number Model

Page 79: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Once the phase CN has been calculated

Calculate Normalized Capillary Number (NCN)

cj

cbjcnj N

NN

Where Ncbj is Base Capillary Number (BCN) = lower threshold value below which the CN has no effect of the phase relative permeabilities.

BCN should be determined experimentally or E300 will estimate

Capillary Number Model

Page 80: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Effect of CN

Kro

Krg

Soil

Immiscible

Soil

Kro

Krg

Miscible

CN at or below BCN Very high CN

Capillary Number Model

Page 81: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Effect of CN on Residual Saturation

As CN rises above the BCN, the residual saturation is reduced

Use saturation scaling parameter Xj

Must know from Special Core Analysis Srbj , a phase residual saturation and parameter mj

cnjj Nmj

rbjjrbj

eX

where

SXS

1

If mj is set to zero phase residual saturation in zero and independent of CN.

Capillary Number Model

Page 82: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 83: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Dia is the activity-corrected diffusion coefficient.

ii

iai xf

DD

ln/ln Diffusion

Thus

Page 84: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Diffusion

Diffusion coefficients

Use diffuse flow relationship:

c is the total molar concentration, given by

c = 1 / Vm

Vm the molar volume of mixture.

Ji is the molar flux of component i per unit area

Di is the diffusion coefficient of component i

is the mole fraction gradient of component i

d

xcDJ i

ii

d

xi

Page 85: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Diffusion

At high pressures, concentration gradient is not most accurate predictor for diffusion.

Component chemical potential should be used. Can then include effect of gravity.

M = Molecular Weight

G = Gravity Constant

h = elevation

00 ln hhGMfRT ii

Page 86: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Diffusion

For isothermal, horizontal flow and using , RT, let Di

a be defined by

d

fxcDJ i

iaii

ln

d

x

xx

f

d

f i

ii

ii

1

ln

lnlnExpanding So that

d

x

x

fDcJ i

i

iaii

ln

ln

d

xcDJ i

iicomparing

Page 87: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

DiffusionTwo possibilities exist in E300:

1. Use normal diffusion coefficients and mole fractions as the driving force Normal diffusion coefficients are entered using DIFFCOIL

and DIFFCGAS.

2. Use activity corrected diffusion coefficients and chemical potential as the driving force. Activity corrected diffusion coefficients are entered using

DIFFAOIL and DIFFAGAS.

Page 88: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

DiffusionAt low pressures, the two coefficients are equal,

as fixiP

With both oil and gas present, the molar concentrations include the saturation and porosity, so that

igioi JJJ

dxDbSJ

d

RTGhMfxDbSJ

iiomooio

iii

aio

mooio

/or

/ln

with

Page 89: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

DiffusionNote that separate oil and gas diffusion

coefficients may be defined, Dio and Dig.

Often only gas coefficients is non-zero.

Page 90: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

DiffusionThe diffusive flow between grid blocks becomes:

RTGhMfbSxDTF iim

ooia

ioDdiff

io /ln

RTGhMfbSyDTF iim

ggia

igDdiff

ig /ln

Combinations such as (xiSobom) are defined on the cell

and treated using up-steam weighting.

Page 91: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 92: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Grid Orientation• Yanosik and McCracken reported on a nine-point finite

difference scheme that would reduce grid orientation effects in high mobility ratio displacements.

i,j

i,j-1

i

j

i+1,j

i+1,j-1i-1,j-1

i+1,j+1i,j+1

i-1,j

i-1,j+1

normal 5-pointtransmissibilities

diagonal transmissibilitiesadded for 9-point

Page 93: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Diagonal and Parallel Grids for Class Problem

Page 94: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

As expected from the saturation distribution shapes shown the diagonal grid has injected fluid breakthrough at a later time and recovers more oil than the parallel grid model.

Water-Cut

time

parallel

diagonal

Page 95: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 96: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Carbon Dioxide Solution in the Aqueous Phase

When CO2 is injected into a oil reservoir a significant amount of the CO2 will dissolveinto the water.

In a WAG injection the solution of the CO2

can be a very important factor.

To model this in the compositional model,fugacities for the CO2 in the three phasesmust be calculated for the 3 phase flash.

Page 97: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Carbon Dioxide Solution in the Aqueous Phase

The basic model is a fugacity function for aqueous CO2 which is constructed to match solubility data in the form:

PaPf COA

CO 22

Function (P) is constructed by considering a pureCO2/aqueous mixture - gas phase fugacity is obtained from EOS.

Page 98: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation
Page 99: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Carbon Dioxide Solution in the Aqueous Phase

Phase equilibrium between aqueous CO2 and hydrocarbon phases is defined by the conditions that fugacity values are equal.

In E300:

CO2SOL turns on the option.

SOLUBILITY keyword allows the input of non-default properties.

Page 100: Discussion on Some Aspects of Compositional Simulation

Carbon Dioxide Solution in the Aqueous Phase

SOLUBILITY

Pressure Rs(CO2) Bwater Viscosity Compress- Saturated ibility mole Psia Mscf/stb RB/Mscf CP 1/Psi fraction

14.6959 0.0021 1.02802 0.30000 0.00000272 0.00028895 787.3909 0.0836 1.04759 0.30000 0.00000272 0.01120103 1560.0858 0.1268 1.05784 0.30000 0.00000272 0.01689270 2332.7808 0.1511 1.06357 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02006145 3105.4757 0.1656 1.06700 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02195732 3878.1707 0.1752 1.06923 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02318996 4650.8656 0.1820 1.07083 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02407221 5423.5606 0.1874 1.07210 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02477146 6196.2555 0.1921 1.07320 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02538009 6968.9505 0.1967 1.07426 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02596283 7741.6454 0.2012 1.07532 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02654488 8514.3404 0.2057 1.07637 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02712623 9287.0353 0.2103 1.07743 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02770689 10059.7303 0.2148 1.07848 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02828686 10832.4252 0.2193 1.07953 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02886613 11605.1202 0.2238 1.08058 0.30000 0.00000272 0.02944471 12377.8151 0.2284 1.08164 0.30000 0.00000272 0.03002261 13150.5101 0.2329 1.08269 0.30000 0.00000272 0.03059981 13923.2050 0.2374 1.08374 0.30000 0.00000272 0.03117633 14695.9000 0.2420 1.08478 0.30000 0.00000272 0.03175217

--------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------