disk resonator format for kinetic inductance...

1
Feedline ground Substrate Microstrip, coupler and bottom disk Top disk Dielectric Disk Resonator Format for Kinetic Inductance Detectors N. Zobrist, M. Daal, B. Mazin, B. Sadoulet UCSB, Broida 2015A, 805-893-3344, [email protected] Motivation We are interested in resonators that allow for higher power readout. Higher readout powers may improve the signal to noise ratio by saturating two level systems. The base design is simple and avoids detailed lithography. Challenges and Ongoing Development Simulations Design Equations Substrate Feedline layer Dielectric layer Disk layer Ls= 20 pH/sq = 2 = 0.2 = 0.02 0.01 0.10 1 10 100 1 5 10 50 Disk Separation, h [μm] f r [GHz] f r = j 1,1 2πr μ 1+ Ls,1+Ls,2 μh Resonant Frequency 0.5 1 5 10 1 5 10 50 100 Disk Radius, r [mm] f r [GHz] Q c = 2 L(C + C c ) 3 Z 0 C 2 c Coupling Q r α P 1/4 μw QQ i δE T 2 c V Signal To TLS Noise α = 1 1+ μh Ls,1+Ls,2 Kinetic Inductance Fraction Disks are well suited for detectors where the event energy spot size is large (e.g. phonon mediated membrane suspended devices). Disk resonators are analytically solvable as microwave circuit elements. All of the wavelengths All of the times mazinlab.org Inductively coupled Disk does not share feedline ground Capacitively coupled Disk shares feedline ground • Sonnet ® E&M Simulation of TM 02 resonance mode f r =4.13 r =0.5 Resonance still exists after meshing Reduces resonance frequency by up to ~17% Reduces metal volume Avoids vortex losses from magnetic flux penetration Meshing is being explored as a way to reduce the resonator volume and vortex penetration. Nearby disk modes could interfere with reading out large numbers of resonators on the same feedline. Slits in the disk may suppress some of these modes. ~10 nm thick dielectrics are needed to reduce the resonator size. We’ve currently reached internal quality factors of ~40,000. See Grégoire Coiffard’s talk (Thursday 12:45 O-65) for another example of a parallel plate resonator geometry that we are exploring. A disk resonator’s resonant frequency depends on its size, disk separation and its surface inductance. High surface inductance materials and small disk separations are needed to bring the resonant frequency into a usable range. Resonator footprints of 500 x 500 µm to 1000 x 1000 µm can be realized in the 1 – 10 GHz range. Resonant frequencies are related to Bessel function zeros. j 1,1 is the first zero of the first Bessel function. Lumped Element Approximation C = πr 2 h L = μh πj 2 1,1 1+ L s,1 + L s,2 μh μ, r h Ls,1 Ls,2 Cc Meshed Disk Solid Disk Disk Radius: 1 mm Disk Separation: 10 nm

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jul-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Disk Resonator Format for Kinetic Inductance Detectorsweb.physics.ucsb.edu/~bmazin/Posters/LTD17_Poster_Zobrist.pdf · N. Zobrist, M. Daal, B. Mazin, B. Sadoulet UCSB, Broida 2015A,

Feedline ground

Substrate

Microstrip, coupler and bottom disk

Top disk

Dielectric

Disk Resonator Format for Kinetic Inductance Detectors N. Zobrist, M. Daal, B. Mazin, B. Sadoulet

UCSB, Broida 2015A, 805-893-3344, [email protected]

Motivation •  We are interested in resonators that allow for higher

power readout. Higher readout powers may improve the signal to noise ratio by saturating two level systems.

•  The base design is simple and avoids detailed lithography.

Challenges and Ongoing Development

Simulations

Design Equations

Substrate

Feedline layer Dielectric layer

Disk layer

Ls= 20 pH/sq= 2= 0.2= 0.02

0.01 0.10 1 10 1001

5

10

50

Disk Separation, h [μm]

f r[GHz]

fr =j1,1

2�r�

µ��

1 + Ls,1+Ls,2

µh

Resonant Frequency

0.5 1 5 101

5

10

50

100

Disk Radius, r [mm]

f r[GHz]

Qc =2�

L(C + Cc)3

Z0 C2c

Coupling Q

� r � � P 1/4µw

�QQi

�E

T 2c V

Signal To TLS Noise

� =1

1 + µhLs,1+Ls,2

Kinetic Inductance Fraction

•  Disks are well suited for detectors where the event energy spot size is large (e.g. phonon mediated membrane suspended devices).

•  Disk resonators are analytically solvable as microwave circuit elements.

All of the wavelengthsAll of the times

mazinlab.org

•  Inductively coupled

•  Disk does not share feedline ground

•  Capacitively coupled

•  Disk shares feedline ground

•  Sonnet® E&M Simulation of TM02 resonance mode

• 

• 

fr = 4.13

r = 0.5

•  Resonance still exists after meshing

•  Reduces resonance frequency by up to ~17%

•  Reduces metal volume

•  Avoids vortex losses from magnetic flux penetration

•  Meshing is being explored as a way to reduce the resonator volume and vortex penetration.

•  Nearby disk modes could interfere with reading out large numbers of resonators on the same feedline. Slits in the disk may suppress some of these modes.

•  ~10 nm thick dielectrics are needed to reduce the resonator size. We’ve currently reached internal quality factors of ~40,000.

•  See Grégoire Coiffard’s talk (Thursday 12:45 O-65) for another example of a parallel plate resonator geometry that we are exploring.

A disk resonator’s resonant frequency depends on its size, disk separation and its surface inductance. High surface inductance materials and small disk separations are needed to bring the resonant frequency into a usable range. Resonator footprints of 500 x 500 µm to 1000 x 1000 µm can be realized in the 1 – 10 GHz range.

Resonant frequencies are related to Bessel function zeros. j1,1 is the first zero of the first Bessel function.

Lumped Element Approximation

C =��r2

hL =

µh

�j21,1

1 +Ls,1 + Ls,2

µh

µ, �

r

hLs,1

Ls,2

Cc

Meshed Disk Solid Disk

Disk Radius: 1 mm

Disk Separation: 10 nm