disruption of the filamentous actin cytoskeleton is necessary for the activation of capacitative...
TRANSCRIPT
www.elsevier.com/locate/cellsig
Cellular Signalling 17
Disruption of the filamentous actin cytoskeleton is necessary for the
activation of capacitative calcium entry in naive smooth muscle cells
Sara Moralesa, Pedro J. Camelloa, Juan A. Rosadoa, Gary M. Maweb, Marıa J. Pozoa,*
aDepartment of Physiology, University of Extremadura, 10071 Caceres, SpainbDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, VT05405, USA
Received 6 September 2004; accepted 11 October 2004
Available online 13 November 2004
Abstract
It has been proposed that cytoskeleton plays a key positive role in the activation of capacitative calcium entry (CCE), which supported the
secretion-like hypothesis for the mechanisms underlying this process. However, its role on CCE in native smooth muscle is unknown. Here
we demonstrate that CCE in isolated gallbladder myocytes was enhanced by cytochalasin D or latrunculin A treatments (agents that cause
actin disassembly) whereas it was reduced by jasplakinolide treatment (which causes actin polymerization), suggesting that actin
cytoskeleton acts as a barrier in CCE. In addition, we show for the first time that depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores by thapsigargin and
cholecystokinin in BAPTA-loaded cells induced a decrease in F-actin content that was consistent with a link between CCE and actin
reorganization. In conclusion, these data suggest an active participation of actin reorganization in the implementation of CCE and support a
conformational coupling model for this process in naive smooth muscle cells.
D 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: F actin content; Store depletion; Thapsigargin
1. Introduction
In smooth muscle, changes in cytosolic Ca2+ concen-
tration ([Ca2+]i) control a vast array of cellular functions
ranging from contraction or relaxation to growth and
apoptosis. This ubiquitous signal is tightly controlled by a
variety of cellular transport systems that act to increase or
remove Ca2+ from the cytosol [1]. One of the least
understood systems is activation of Ca2+ entry through
plasma membrane following depletion of intracellular Ca2+
stores, a process termed capacitative Ca2+ entry (CCE) [2].
The base of this mechanism, initially observed in non
excitable cells, is that Ca2+ concentration within the intra-
cellular Ca2+ pools (mainly endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic
reticulum, E/SR) determines the permeability of plasma
0898-6568/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.10.002
* Corresponding author. Department of Physiology, Nursing School,
Avda Universidad s/n, 10071 Caceres, Spain. Tel.: +34 927 257450; fax:
+34 927 257451.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M.J. Pozo).
membrane to external Ca2+, so that Ca2+ release from the
stores increases Ca2+ influx, resulting in a sustained Ca2+
plateau during stimulation. Contrary to non-excitable cells,
reports of CCE in excitable tissues are relatively scarce. In
gallbladder smooth muscle (GBSM), we have recently
demonstrated that release of Ca2+ from internal stores
activates a CCE pathway, in addition to activating Ca2+
influx through L-type Ca2+ channels [3].
Despite the intense research in the field, the mechanism
that links fall of Ca2+ concentration in the stores to opening
of plasma membrane Ca2+ channels remains highly con-
troversial. One set of hypotheses postulates the release of a
diffusible messenger by the pools, while others claim a
physical interaction between the empty stores and plasma
membrane involving membrane proteins, secretory vesicles
and possibly cytoskeletal elements (reviewed in Ref. [4]).
The cytoskeleton is an integrated, dynamically arranged
network of actin fibers, microtubules and intermediate
filaments that is involved in various cellular processes
including cell motility, intracellular transport and smooth
(2005) 635–645
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645636
muscle contraction [5,6]. F-actin cytoskeleton rearrange-
ment provides cells a valuable tool to control a variety of
functions such as cell strength and contractility [7,8]. The
actin cytoskeleton forms a complex network, providing the
structural basis for simultaneous interactions between multi-
ple cellular structures. A number of studies in different cell
types have reported a positive role for the actin cytoskeleton
in the activation of CCE. For example, experimental
manipulation of the cortical actin cytoskeleton has been
used as evidence for a secretion-like coupling model in
cultured smooth muscle cells [9] and other cell types
[10,11]. However, in other cells, such as RBL-1 cells
[12,13] or vascular smooth muscle cells [14], CCE has been
shown to be unaffected by such cytoskeletal disruption.
In the current study, we sought to test the hypothesis that
the actin cytoskeleton plays a role in the CCE process of
GBSM cells. Our results demonstrate that disruption of actin
cytoskeleton is associated with an increase in CCE, which
supports a negative role for actin cytoskeleton acting as a
barrier in the activation of capacitative mechanisms. In
addition, we show for the first time that CCE activation by
experimental and physiological stimuli is linked to actin
depolymerization. All together, our data indicate that a
direct coupling model is the one that best fit with our
findings.
2. Methods
2.1. Tissue preparation
Gallbladders, isolated from 300- to 500-g male guinea
pigs, after deep halothane anesthesia and cervical disloca-
tion, were immediately placed in cold Krebs-Henseleit
solution (K-HS; for composition see Solutions and chem-
icals) at pH 7.35. The gallbladder was opened from the end
of the cystic duct to the base, and trimmed of any adherent
liver tissue. After the preparation was washed with the
nutrient solution to remove any biliary component, the
mucosa was carefully dissected away. All the experiments
were carried out according to the guidelines of Animal Care
and Use Committees of the University of Extremadura.
2.2. Cell isolation
GBSM cells were dissociated enzymatically using a
previously described method [15]. Briefly, after preparing
the tissue as indicated above, the gallbladder was cut into
small pieces and incubated for 35 min at 37 8C in
enzyme solution (ES, for composition see Solutions and
chemicals) supplemented with 1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mg/ml
papain and 1 mg/ml dithioerythritol (DTT). Then the tissue
was transferred to fresh ES containing 1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mg/
ml collagenase and 100 AM CaCl2, and incubated for 9 min
at 37 8C. The tissue was then washed three times using Na+-
HEPES solution (for composition see Solutions and
chemicals), and the single smooth muscle cells were isolated
by several passages of the tissue pieces through the tip of a
fire-polished glass Pasteur pipette. The resultant cell
suspension was kept in Na+- HEPES solution at 4 8C until
use, generally within 6 h. All experiments involving isolated
cells were performed at room temperature (22 8C).
2.3. F-actin content measurement
The F-actin content of resting and stimulated GBSM
cells was determined according to a previously published
procedure [16]. Briefly, samples of GBSM cell suspen-
sions (200 Al) were challeged in Na+-HEPES solution
and quickly transferred to 200 Al ice-cold 3% (w/v)
formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS,
for composition see Solution and chemicals) for 10 min.
Fixed cells were permeabilised by incubation for 10 min
with 0.025 % (v/v) Nonidet P-40 detergent dissolved in
PBS. Cells were then incubated for 30 min with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-labeled phalloidin (FITC-phalloidin; 1 AM)
in PBS solution supplemented with 0.5 % (w/v) bovine
serum albumin (BSA). After incubation, the cells were
collected by centrifugation for 2 min at 10000�g and
resuspended in PBS solution. Staining of actin filaments
was measured using a Shimadzu fluorescence spectro-
fluorimeter. Samples were excited at 496 nm and emission
was recorded at 516 nm.
For actin filament visualization, aliquots of FITC-
phalloidin-stained cells were transferred to an experimen-
tal chamber made with a glass poly-d-lysine-treated
coverslip (0.17 mm thick), and mounted on the stage
of an inverted microscope (Eclipse TE300, Nikon). F-
actin was visualised using a confocal laser-scanning
system (model MRC-1024, Bio-Rad) with excitation
wavelength of 488 nm and emission at 515 nm. The
cell F-actin content was quantified as arbitrary units of
fluorescence using the ImageJ software.
2.4. Cell loading and [Ca2+]i determination
[Ca2+]i was determined by epifluorescence microscopy
using the fluorescent ratiometric Ca2+ indicator, fura-2.
Isolated cells were loaded with 4 AM fura 2-AM at room
temperature for 25 min. An aliquot of cell suspension was
placed in an experimental chamber made with a glass poly-
d-lysine-treated coverslip (0.17 mm thick) filled with Na+-
HEPES solution, and mounted on the stage of an inverted
microscope (Diaphot T200, Nikon). After the cell sedimen-
tation, a gravity-fed system was used to perfuse the chamber
with Na+-HEPES solution in absence or presence of
experimental agents. For deesterification of the dye, z20
min were allowed to elapse before Ca2+ measurements were
started.
Cells were illuminated at 340 and 380 nm by a computer-
controlled filter wheel (Lambda-2, Sutter Instruments) at
0.3–1 cycles/s and the emitted fluorescence was selected by
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645 637
a 500-nm band-pass filter. The emitted fluorescence images
were captured with a cooled digital charge-coupled device
camera (model C-4880-91, Hamamatsu Photonics) and
recorded using dedicated software (Argus-HisCa, Hama-
matsu Photonics). The ratio of fluorescence at 340 nm to
fluorescence at 380 nm (F340/F380) was calculated pixel by
pixel and used to indicate the changes in [Ca2+]i. A
calibration of the ratio for [Ca2+] was not performed in
view of the many uncertainties related to the binding
properties of fura-2 with Ca2+ inside of smooth muscle cells.
For loading with dimethyl BAPTA, cells were incubated
for 30 min at 37 8C with 10 AM dimethyl BAPTA/AM.
2.5. Intracellular recording from smooth muscle
The methods to be used for intracellular electrophysio-
logical recording were similar to those previously described
[17]. The gallbladder whole mount preparation was pinned,
serosal side up, in a 3-ml tissue chamber and placed on the
stage of an inverted microscope (Diaphot T300, Nikon).
Smooth muscle bundles were visualized at �200 with
Hoffman Modulation Contrast optics (Modulation Optics,
Greenvale, NY, USA). The preparations were continuously
perfused at a rate of 10–12 ml/min with modified Krebs
solution (for composition see Solutions and drugs) aerated
with 95% O2–5% CO2. Temperature was maintained
between 36 and 37 8C at the recording site.
Glass microelectrodes were filled with 2.0 M KCl and
had resistances in the range of 50–110 MV. A negative-
capacity compensation amplifier (Axoclamp 2A; Axon
Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA) with bridge circuit
was used to record membrane potentials, and outputs were
displayed on an oscilloscope (Hitachi VC-6050). Electrical
signals were recorded using the computer program, MacLab
(CB Sciences, Milford MA, USA). Experimental com-
pounds were applied by addition to the superfusing solution.
2.6. Solutions and chemicals
The K-HS solution contained (in mM): NaCl 113, KCl
4.7, CaCl2 2.5, KH2PO4 1.2, MgSO4 1.2, NaHCO3 25 and
d-glucose 11.5. This solution had a final pH of 7.35 after
equilibration with 95% CO2–5% O2. The composition (mM)
of the modified Krebs solution used in the intracellular
recordings was: NaCl 121, KCl 5.9, CaCl2 2.5, NaH2PO4
1.2, MgCl 1.2, NaHCO3 25 and d-glucose 8. The ES
solution used to disperse cells was made up of (in mM): N-
2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-NV-2-sulphonic acid (HEPES) 10,
NaCl 55, KCl 5.6, Na-Glutamate 80, MgCl2 2, and d-
glucose 10, with pH adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH. The Na+-
HEPES solution contained (in mM): HEPES 10, NaCl 140,
KCl 4.7, CaCl2 2, MgCl2 2 and d-glucose 10, with pH
adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH. The PBS solution used in F-
actin studies contained (in mM): NaCl 137, KCl 2.7,
Na2HPO4 5.62, NaH2PO4 1.09 and KH2PO4 1.47 with pH
adjusted to 7.2.
Drug concentrations are expressed as final bath concen-
trations of active species. Drugs and chemicals were
obtained from the following sources: cholecystokinin (26–
33) (CCK-8) sulfated, 1,4-dithio-dl-threitol (DTT), nonidet
P40, paraformaldehyde, fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled
phalloidin (FITC-phalloidin) and thapsigargin (TPS) were
from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), cytochalasin D (CytD)
and latrunculina A (LatA) were from Calbiochem (La Jolla,
CA, USA), 2-aminoethoxydiphenylborane (2-APB) was
from Tocris (Bristol, UK), dimethyl bis-(o-aminophe-
noxy)-ethane-N,N,NV,NV-tetra-acetic acid acetoxymethyl
ester (dimethyl BAPTA AM), fura-2 AM and jasplakinolide
(JP) were from Molecular Probes (Molecular Probes
Europe, Leiden, Netherlands), collagenase was from Fluka
(Madrid, Spain), and papain was from Worthington Bio-
chemical (Lakewood, NJ, USA). Other chemicals used were
of analytical grade from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain).
Stock solutions of 2-APB, dimethyl BAPTA-AM, fura 2-
AM, JP, LatA and TPS were prepared in dimethylsulph-
oxide (DMSO) and stocks solutions of CytD and FITC-
phalloidin were prepared in ethanol. The solutions were
diluted such that the final concentration of DMSO or
ethanol was V0.1% v/v. These concentrations of solvents did
not themselves affect the mechanical activity of the tissue
nor interfere with fura-2 fluorescence.
2.7. Quantification and statistics
Results are expressed as meanFthe standard error of the
mean of n cells. Statistical differences between means were
determined by Student’s t-test. Differences were considered
significant when Pb0.05.
3. Results
3.1. F-actin content in GBSM was decreased by cytocha-
lasin D and latrunculin A and increased by jasplakinolide
In the current investigation, cytochalasin D (CytD),
latrunculin A (LatA) and jasplakinolide (JP) were used to
modify the F-actin content in GBSM. To inhibit actin
filament assembly we used CytD and LatA [18] whereas JP
was the tool of choice to increase actin polymerization [19].
In the current study, F-actin was quantified using the
fluorescent derivative of phalloidin, FICT-phalloidin, and
two different fluorescence methods. Fig. 1 shows the
distribution of actin in control GBSM cells (panel A) and
after exposure to 10 AM CytD, 3 AM LatA and 10 AM JP
(panels B, C and D). Isolated GBSM cells do not have
prominent actin stress fibres that are typical of cultured
smooth muscle cells, rather their cytoskeleton resem-
bles that of other fresh isolated smooth muscle cells [20].
Both CytD and LatA induced a decrease in phalloidin
fluorescence (control: 34.31F2.95 arbitrary units, a.u., n=8;
CytD: 19.03F1.43 a.u., n=9, Pb0.001 vs. control; LatA:
Fig. 1. Effects of cytochalasin, latrunculin A and jasplakinolide on GBSM cell F-actin content. Confocal fluorescence images of FITC-labelled phaloidin
showing the distribution of F-actin content in GBSM cells in control conditions (A), and after treatment with 10 AM CytD (B), 3 AM LatA (C) and 10 AM JP
(D). Cells were treated with the cytoskeleton modifying drugs for 45 min, except for LatA that was always incubated for 60 min. Images are representative of
six to nine experiments. Panel E shows summary data of fluorescence intensities from confocal images in the above-described conditions. Histograms are
meanFSEM of six to nine experiments. Similar pattern in F-actin content is shown in panel F where fluorescence was measured in a cell suspension using a
fluorescence spectrophotometer. F-actin content is expressed as percentage of control. To reduce variability due to cell isolation and to changes in the cell
density along the experiment each time two volumes of cell suspension were taken: one for control and the other for the corresponding experimental group.
Histograms are meanFSEM of four to nine experiments. *Pb0.05, **Pb0.01, ***Pb0.001 respect to control, respectively.
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645638
20.75F2.43 a.u., n=6, Pb0.01 vs. control; Fig. 1E), whereas
the treatment with JP caused a significant increase in
detectable fluorescence, indicating an increase in actin
polymerization (JP: 44.65F3.35 a.u., n=6, Pb0.05 vs.
control). Similar results were obtained when a suspension
of FITC-phalloidin stained GBSM cells was evaluated by
spectrofluorometry. To minimize variability in fluorescence
due to changes in the density of the cell suspension
throughout time or in different preparations, we routinely
acquired two samples at the same time: one for control and
the other for the experimental conditions. As indicated
above, CytD decreased F-actin content (in arbitrary units) by
62.3% (7.20F0.5 vs. 2.62F0.39 a.u., n=5, Pb0.001, Fig.
1F), LatA also caused a significant reduction (11.25F1.91
vs. 6.45F1.17 a.u., n=9, 41.6% of reduction, Pb0.05, Fig.
1F) whereas JP increased the F-actin content (9.28F0.99 vs.
13.22F0.8 a.u., 46.2% of increase, n=4 , Pb0.05, Fig. 1F).
Based on the consistency of the results obtained by both
methods, and to avoid cellular variability, we selected the
spectrofluorimeter technique to quantify actin content
throughout the remainder of the study.
3.2. CCE was altered by disassembly and polymerization/
reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton
To test whether the actin cytoskeleton plays a role in CCE
mechanisms in GBSM cells we activated CCE by using a
protocol previously validated in this cellular model [3]. Ca2+
stores were depleted by the SERCA pump inhibitor,
thapsigargin (TPS, 1 AM) in a Ca2+-free medium for 30
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645 639
min. When external Ca2+ was reintroduced, a sustained
[Ca2+]i increase (0.074F0.003 DF340/F380, n=39) was
observed (Fig. 2A), indicative of enhanced permeability to
extracellular Ca2+. To assess the effects of actin cytoskeleton
in the activation of Ca2+ entry, fura 2-loaded cells were pre-
treated with 10 AMCytD for 45 min before emptying of Ca2+
stores. Interestingly, under these conditions Ca2+ reintroduc-
tion induced a [Ca2+]i increase that reached a plateau of
0.138F0.014 DF340/F380 (n=11, Pb0.01 vs. control, Fig.
2B). A similar pattern was also observed when actin
disassembly was evoked with 3 AM LatA (0.137F0.014
Fig. 2. CCE is altered by disassembling and polymerization/reorganization of
fluorescence ratio in response to Ca2+ store depletion and Ca2+ restoration in contr
latrunculin A (C) and 10 AM jasplakinolide (D). Fura-2 loaded GBSM cells were
stores. When indicated, cells were perfused with a 2 mM Ca2+ HEPES solution r
incubated with the cytoskeleton modifying drugs at least 45 min prior to TPS trea
above described conditions. Histograms are meanFSEM of 12–15 experiments. *
DF340/F380, n=15, Pb0.001 vs. control, Fig. 2C). However,
when 10 AM JP was used, restoration of external Ca2+
induced a capacitative behaviour, although the plateau was
smaller than in control cells (0.050F0.004DF340/F380, n=12,
Pb0.001 vs. control, Fig. 2D). These data suggest that the
membrane-associated cytoskeleton acts a physical barrier
that inhibits Ca2+ entry by capacitative mechanisms.
We have previously demonstrated that in addition to
bclassicalQ capacitative channels L-type channels are acti-
vated in GBSM cells in response to depletion of Ca2+ stores
[3]. To determine whether actin cytoskeleton integrity is
the actin cytoskeleton. Representative original traces of changes in the
ol GBSM cells (A) and in the presence of 10 AM cytochalasin D (B), 3 AMtreated with 1 AM thapsigargin (TPS) in Ca2+ free solution to deplete the
esulting in a sustained [Ca2+]i increase. In panels B, C, D, cells were pre-
tment. Panel E shows summary data of DF340/F380 from experiments in the
*Pb0.01, ***Pb0.001 respect to control.
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645640
necessary in the overall influx or specifically to a particular
channel, CCE was activated in the presence of the L-type
Ca2+ channel inhibitor, nitrendipine (1 AM). As observed in
Fig. 3A and B, CytD-induced actin disassembly caused a
significant increase in CCE (0.055F0.004 vs. 0.108F0.006
DF340/F380, 198 % of increase, n=15 and 13, respectively;
Pb0.001).
When external Ca2+ restorationwas performed in presence
of 100 AM 2-APB, to block capacitative channels and allow
Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channels, disruption of the
actin cytoskeleton did not modify Ca2+ influx (0.044F0.003
vs. 0.052F0.003 DF340/F380 in the absence and presence of
CytD, respectively, n=14; PN0.05; Fig. 3C and D). These
results suggest a specific and negative role for the actin
cytoskeleton in the activation of mechanisms gating CCE
channels in GBSM cells. According to this hypothesis, in the
presence of JP the activation of capacitative channels should
be impaired. Consistent with this model, in the presence of JP
Ca2+ restoration-induced Ca2+ influx was almost completely
Fig. 3. Actin cytoskeleton disassembly induces activation of Ca2+ influx through
presence of the L-type Ca2+ channel blocker, nitrendipine (1 AM) and the capac
presence (B, D) of 10 AM CytD, respectively. CCE was activated as described in
treatment. Panel E shows summary data of DF340/F380 from experiments in the abo
***Pb0.001 respect to control.
blocked when the membrane potential was hyperpolarized by
the KATP channel activator pinacidil (5 AM) (81.3F7.0% of
inhibition, n=15, Pb0.001), indicating that in these con-
ditions there was not Ca2+ influx through voltage-independ-
ent Ca2+ channels.
To further investigate if actin cytoskeleton disruption was
affecting Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channels, we
studied the effects of CytD-induced actin filament dis-
assembly on KCl-induced Ca2+ signaling. CytD by itself did
not modify resting [Ca2+]i, nor had any effects on the
fluorescent probe, fura-2, as there was no changes in the
time course of DF340/F380 when fura-2-loaded cells where
monitored in the absence and presence of 10 AM CytD for
45 min (0.855F0.038 vs. 0.864F0.037, n=20). This treat-
ment did not cause any substantial alteration in cell
morphology. The presence of CytD also did not modify
Ca2+ influx through L-type channels, as similar changes in
[Ca2+]i were recorded in response to exposure of the cells to
60 mM KCl in the absence or presence of CytD (KCl:
capacitative Ca2+ channels. Representative original traces of CCE in the
itative Ca2+ channel blocker, 2-APB (100 AM) in the absence (A, C) and
the legend of Fig. 2. In panels B, D CytD was applied 45 min prior to TPS
ve-described conditions. Histograms are meanFSEM of 13–15 experiments.
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645 641
0.28F0.03 DF340/F380; KCl+CytD: 0.29F0.04 DF340/F380,
n=13, PN0.05, Fig. 4A and B). Consistent with these results,
JP also had no effects on KCl-induced Ca2+ entry (KCl:
0.153F0.032 DF340/F380; KCl+JP: 0.153F0.036 DF340/
F380, n=7, PN0.05, Fig. 4C).
To confirm our hypothesis that actin cytoskeleton
disruption specifically affected specifically CCE mecha-
nisms, we used 10 nM CCK to activate IP3-mediated Ca2+
release and activate CCE. As shown in Fig. 4D, we recorded
the typical pattern for SR depleting agents as the response
consisted of a transient elevation followed by a steady state
level slightly above the resting level. After CytD pre-
treatment, the peak, indicative of store depletion, was
unchanged (CCK: 0.37F0.06 DF340/F380; CCK+CytD:
0.40F0.07 DF340/F380, n=13 and 16 for control and CytD,
respectively, PN0.05, Fig. 4D and E). However, the steady
state level, which reflects Ca2+ entry activated by store
depletion, was significantly increased (CCK: 0.065F0.020
DF340/F380; CCK+CytD: 0.160F0.030 DF340/F380, n=13
and 16 for control and CytD, respectively, Pb0.05, Fig. 4D
and E). When cells were pre-treated with JP and then
challenged with 10 nM CCK there was not any significant
change in CCK-evoked Ca2+ transient (CCK: 0.246F0.044
DF340/F380; CCK+JP: 0.254F0.046 DF340/F380, n=10,
PN0.05, Fig. 4F). However, the sustained plateau indicative
Fig. 4. Effects of cytoskeleton disruption on KCl and CCK-induced Ca2+ transi
GBSM fura-2 loaded cells in response to 60 mM KCl and 10 nM CCK, in the ab
(panels C, F). These recordings are representative of 10–16 such experiments. In
drug at least 45 min prior to the stimuli.
of CCE, was significantly reduced (CCK: 0.031F0.006
DF340/F380; CCK+JP: 0.011F0.002 DF340/F380, n=10,
Pb0.01, Fig. 4F). These findings suggest that actin
disassembly does not change the size of the Ca2+ pools or
the release mechanisms of the stores but it favours CCE,
which is consistent with a specific inhibitory role of
cytoskeleton on CCE.
As the increase in CCE we found could be due to
alterations in the membrane potential and thus, to changes
in the driving force for Ca2+ influx, we performed
intracellular recordings in the whole mount gallbladder
preparation to test whether actin disruption affects the
resting membrane potentials. GBSM cells generate rhyth-
mic spontaneous action potentials with a depolarizing
spike that results from activation of L-type voltage-
dependent calcium channels [17]. As demonstrated in
Fig. 5, addition of 10 AM CytD did not cause a detectable
change in the resting membrane potential (control:
�48.0F4.3 mV; 3 min after 10 AM CytD: �47.5F4.1
mV; 10 min after 10 AM CytD: �50.3F5.1 mV; 30 min
after 10 AM CytD: �48.8F7.1 mV, n=3–7, PN0.05 vs.
control), the frequency of action potentials (control:
0.28F0.05 Hz; 3 min after 10 AM CytD: 0.31F0.05
mV; 10 min after 10 AM CytD: 0.23F0.04 mV; 30 min
after 10 AM CytD: 0.23F0.06 mV, n=3–7, PN0.05 vs.
ents. Representative original traces of changes in the fluorescence ratio in
sence (panels A, D) or presence of 10 AM CytD (panels B, E) or 10 AM JP
panels B, C, E, F cells were pre-incubated with the cytoskeleton modifying
Fig. 5. Actin cytoskeleton disassembly does not alter resting membrane potential or spontaneous action potentials. Representative transmembrane voltage
recordings (Vm) from an intact gallbladder smooth muscle cell showing the effects of 10 AM CytD. Expanded speed traces below demonstrate individual action
potentials recorded in the two experimental conditions (n=7). The resting membrane potential of the cell impaled was �42.7 mV.
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645642
control) or the shape of action potentials, indicating no
changes in membrane conductances that contribute to the
active or passive membrane properties of these cells.
3.3. CCE induced actin disassembly
Our results suggest that actin cytoskeleton manipulation
affects CCE, supporting a role for the actin cytoskeleton as a
Fig. 6. CCE activation causes actin cytoskeleton disassembly. (A) Changes in F-ac
stimulation of GBSM cells with 10 nM CCK and 60 mM KCl. Data are expressed a
meanFSEM of 7–11 experiments. These decreases in F-actin content are not relate
reduction when TPS and CCK were applied in 10 AM BAPTA loaded cells (B).
barrier for Ca2+ influx after store depletion. These data are the
result of using pharmacological tools to manipulate the
cytoskeleton, which might have a general effect on CCE,
although changes in the cytoskeleton should not participate in
the activation of CCE. To assess whether CCE activation is
related to changes in actin cytoskeleton, the F-actin content
was measured after inducing CCE with TPS in Ca2+-free
medium or 10 nM CCK. TPS treatment (for 30 min) caused a
tin contents after the depletion of stores with TPS in Ca2+ free medium and
s % of F-actin content in control or unstimulated conditions. Histograms are
d to TPS depletion- or CCK-induced increases in [Ca2+]i as there was also a
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645 643
reduction in F-actin content (7.32F0.95 vs. 4.72F0.45 a.u.,
26.2% reduction, n=12, Pb0.05, Fig. 6A). Application of 10
nM CCK for 7–8 min also decreased actin polymerization
(8.68F0.42 vs. 4.25F0.46 a.u., 51.0% reduction, n=8, P b
0.001, Fig. 6A). To our knowledge, this is the first
experimental evidence demonstrating that cell stimulation
with Ca2+ releasing-agonists induces a net and sustained actin
filament depolymerization. To investigate whether this effect
was due to Ca2+ store depletion we performed a series of
experiments using KCl depolarization. When 60 mM KCl
was applied, there was no significant change in F-actin
content (10.08F2.23 vs. 10.75F2.62 a.u., n=7, PN0.05, Fig.
6A). To rule out the possibility that increases in [Ca2+]ievoked by store depletion would be responsible for actin
reorganization, we repeated the TPS and CCK experimental
groups in BAPTA-loaded cells. BAPTA loading was able to
abolish the [Ca2+]i increases in response to both KCl and
CCK in fura-2 loaded cells (data not shown). As shown in
Fig. 6B, pre-treatment with BAPTA did not have any effect
on actin reorganization induced by both TPS and CCK (TPS:
8.79F0.672 vs. 5.91F0.052 a.u., 30.9% reduction, n=8,
Pb0.01; CCK: 8.90F0.56 vs. 3.94F0.43 a.u., 55.7 %
reduction, n=8, Pb0.001; Fig. 6B), suggesting that actin
depolymerization was mediated by store depletion (Fig. 6).
4. Discussion
The present study was conducted to elucidate the
possible role of actin cytoskeleton in CCE mechanisms in
GBSM cells. This study provides the first demonstration
that Ca2+ store depletion is linked to actin cytoskeleton
depolymerization to activate capacitative channels and
induce Ca2+ influx in naive smooth muscle cells. We
provide evidence for a novel negative regulatory role of
actin cytoskeleton on CCE.
In this cellular model, the FITC-phalloidin stained actin
cytoskeleton appears as a uniform structure in contrast with
previous reports involving cultured smooth muscle cells,
where stress fibers are evident [9,21,22]. Similar to our
results, actin cytoskeleton in isolated mesenteric artery
myocytes is more densely packed and is not organized into
thick strands [20], as in myocytes from intact preparations
[23,24]. Thus, actin stress fibers reflect an actin filament
reorganization that is associated with maintenance of cells in
culture.
In the current study, actin disassembly induced by pre-
treatment with two unrelated depolymerizing agents, CytD
and LatA, enhanced CCE, whereas actin stabilization
induced by JP caused a reduction of capacitative Ca2+
influx. These effects appear to be specific to a CCE
mechanism as [Ca2+]i mobilization from intracellular stores
or Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channles remained
insensitive to actin cytoskeleton dynamics.
A link between cytoskeletal structure and intracellular
levels of Ca2+ has been suggested in other studies, and a
number of underlying mechanisms have been proposed [25–
29]. The actin cytoskeleton may itself be part of the
intracellular Ca2+ store apparatus, and actin depolymeriza-
tion might result in cytoplasmic Ca2+ elevation [25]. This
mechanism probably is not responsible for the CytD effects
in our experiments because there was no changes in [Ca2+]iin response to CytD application in resting conditions.
Smooth muscle cells, as other excitable tissues, are
largely dependent on ionic conductances in the sarcolemma
[30], a cell region that is closely related to cytoskeleton.
This structural element could modify Ca2+ entry by
modulating Ca2+ channels or other ionic conductances in
the plasma membrane that determine membrane potential
[30]. However, results from this investigation rule out the
possibility of changes in the membrane potential and hence
driving force for Ca2+ entry to explain the increase in CCE
caused by disruption of actin cytoskeleton, as under CytD
treatment membrane membrane potential remained the
same. This was also confirmed by the lack of effects of
CytD in resting Ca2+ levels in isolated smooth muscle cells.
Provocative results have been reported regarding the role
of actin cytoskeleton on L-type Ca2+ channel activity in
smooth muscle; either inhibition or activation has been
reported for vascular cells [31,32] and no effects were found
on cells isolated from ileum [33]. In the present study, we
did not detect any change in KCl-induced [Ca2+]i elevation
in CytD or JP pre-treated cells compared to controls.
Moreover, when store-depletion induced-Ca2+ influx was
induced in the presence of 2-APB, to block capacitative
Ca2+ channels, and isolate store depletion-induced L-type
Ca2+ channel activation [3], no changes were induced by
modifications in actin cytoskeletal dynamics. In addition,
spontaneous action potentials, which involve Ca2+ entry
through L-type Ca2+ channels [17], were unaltered by CytD.
These results suggest that, at least in GBSM cells, L-type
Ca2+ channels are not regulated by actin cytoskeleton,
consistent with results reported for another gastrointestinal
smooth muscle type [33]. The discrepancy with the results
reported by Gokina and Osol [32] could be due to
interferences of mechanoreception-induced changes in the
cytoskeleton, as this study was performed in pressurized
arteries. On the other hand, the study of Nakamura et al.
[31] was performed in cultured vascular cells, and, as
discussed above, maintenance of smooth muscle cells in
culture conditions induces an obvious rearrangement in the
cytoskeleton, which could also be responsible for changes in
the regulatory functions of this element.
Several investigations have suggested the existence of a
physical relationship between the ER and the actin
cytoskeleton [26,34]. Moreover, there is evidence for
impaired function of ER enzymes and/or receptors in cells
with cytoskeletal disruption. In agreement with this, it has
been proposed that the cytoskeleton is involved in the
regulation of IP3 binding, IP3 receptor-mediated Ca2+
release and the spatial relationship between plasma mem-
brane and IP3 receptors [26,35,36]. Our results do not
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645644
indicate a primary role for the cytoskeleton in affecting Ca2+
release through IP3Rs, as the Ca2+ transients evoked by the
IP3 releasing agent, CCK remain unaltered after CytD or JP
pre-treatment. This might be related to the lack of changes
in cell shape induced by cytoskeletal alterations in our
cellular model. However, the significant changes in CCK-
evoked [Ca2+]i plateau induced by CytD and JP treatment,
clearly indicate a role of the cytoskeleton in the communi-
cation between depleted stores and CCE channels in the
plasma membrane.
The activation of Ca2+ entry following depletion of
intracellular Ca2+ stores is a signalling process of great
relevance both in excitable and non-excitable cells. In this
process, studies on the role of the actin cytoskeleton have
provided conflicting results in different cell types. In this
context, it is important to differentiate between the roles
suggested to the experimentally induced cortical membrane-
associated actin barrier and the normal cytoplasmic actin
network. The former has been found to act as a negative
clamp preventing Ca2+ entry in several cell types such as
cultured smooth muscle cells [9], platelets [29], corneal
endothelial cells [10], DT40 lymphocytes [37] and pancre-
atic acinar cells [11]. On the other hand, a role for the
integrity of the cytosolic actin network in CCE has been
demonstrated by using cytoskeletal disrupters in some cells,
including vascular endothelial cells [38], astrocytes [39],
platelets [29], HepG2 cells [40], pancreatic acinar cells [11],
while this experimental manoeuvre had no effect in NIH
3T3 [26], cultured smooth muscle cells [9] or RBL-1 cells
[12]. Although the reasons for this discrepancy are unclear,
the proximity of the ER to the plasma membrane, and
therefore the requirement of transport of portions of the ER
toward the cell membrane, supported by the actin cytoske-
leton, might be important.
Using different cytoskeletal modifications our results
provide new insight regarding the involvement of the actin
cytoskeleton in the activation of CCE in a naive smooth
muscle cellular model. Our results clearly indicate that the
actin cytoskeleton in GBSM cells acts as a barrier
preventing conformational coupling between the sarcoplas-
mic reticulum and plasma membrane. In these cells, store
depletion stimulated by the physiological agonist CCK or
induced by TPS resulted in a net decrease in the F-actin
content. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration
that the disruption of actin cytoskeleton can be linked to
store depletion. This effect was found to be entirely
dependent on store depletion and not on rises in [Ca2+]isince BAPTA loading did not modify the effects of CCK or
TPS on the F-actin content. Consistent with this finding,
disruption of the GBSM cell actin filament network with
CytD or LatA was found to facilitate the coupling
mechanism increasing CCE whereas increased actin poly-
merization by JP significantly inhibited CCE in these cells.
Taken together, the findings of this investigation indicate
that the conformation coupling model is the paradigm that
best describes the activation of CCE in GBSM cells. In
contrast to the model described by Patterson and co-workers
[9] in cultured smooth muscle cells, in GBSM cells CytD-
or LatA-treatment increased CCE. In this cellular model
vesicle trafficking or any other event that requires the
support of the actin cytoskeleton does not seem to be needed
for CCE. Our results are inconsistent with the hypothesis
that Ca2+ pool depletion promotes an insertion of vesicles
containing capacitative Ca2+ entry channels [41], since such
an exocytotic mechanism usually depends on an intact
cytoskeletal network. Instead, the physiological cortical
actin network would act as a barrier, preventing coupling
between elements in the SR and plasma membrane. Thus,
CCE is facilitated by cytoskeletal disrupters and prevented
by stabilization of the cortical barrier. Although speculative,
the different sources of the smooth muscle cells and/or the
use of cultured or fresh cells might account for these
differences. In summary, our results support a coupling
mechanism involving direct, spatially restricted interactions
between SR and plasma membrane proteins in the activation
of CCE in GBSM cells. The intracellular signaling between
depleted Ca2+ stores and changes in the actin cytoskeletal
dynamics remains to be determined.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Dr Onesmo Balemba for
assistance with the intracellular electrophysiological studies
and to M.P. Delgado for her technical assistance. This work
was supported by the Spanish MCyT grant SAF-2001-0295
0295 (MJP) and NIH grant NS26995 (GMM). S. Morales is
supported by Ministry of Education Predoctoral Research
Grant.
References
[1] K.M. Sanders, J. Appl. Physiol. 91 (2001) 1438.
[2] J.W. Putney, Cell Calcium 7 (1986) 1.
[3] S. Morales, P.J. Camello, S. Alcon, G.M. Salido, G. Mawe, M.J.
Pozo, Am. J. Physiol., Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 286 (2004)
G1090.
[4] J.W. Putney, R.R. McKay, Bioessays 21 (1999) 38.
[5] C.L. Carpenter, Crit. Care Med. 28 (2000) N94.
[6] P.A. Janmey, Physiol. Rev. 78 (1998) 763.
[7] D. Mehta, S.J. Gunst, J. Physiol. 519 (1999) 829.
[8] C. Li, Q. Xu, Cell. Signal. 12 (2000) 435.
[9] R.L. Patterson, D.B. van Rossum, D.L. Gill, Cell 98 (1999) 487.
[10] Q. Xie, Y. Zhang, C. Zhai, J.A. Bonanno, J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002)
16559.
[11] P.C. Redondo, A.I. Lajas, G.M. Salido, A. Gonzalez, J.A. Rosado,
J.A. Pariente, Biochem. J. 370 (2003) 255.
[12] D. Bakowski, M.D. Glitsch, A.B. Parekh, J. Physiol. 532 (2001)
55.
[13] D. Bakowski, R.D. Burgoyne, A.B. Parekh, J. Physiol. 553 (2003)
387.
[14] T. Smani, S.I. Zakharov, P. Csutora, E. Leno, E.S. Trepakova, V.M.
Bolotina, Nat. Cell Biol. 6 (2004) 113.
[15] M.J. Pozo, G.J. Perez, M.T. Nelson, G.M. Mawe, Am. J. Physiol.:
Gasterointest. Liver Physiol. 282 (2002) G165.
S. Morales et al. / Cellular Signalling 17 (2005) 635–645 645
[16] J.A. Rosado, S.O. Sage, Biochem. J. 347 (2000) 183.
[17] L. Zhang, A.D. Bonev, M.T. Nelson, G.M. Mawe, Am. J. Physiol. 265
(1993) C1552.
[18] I. Spector, N.R. Shochet, D. Blasberger, Y. Kashman, Cell Motil.
Cytoskelet. 13 (1989) 127.
[19] M.R. Bubb, A.M. Senderowicz, E.A. Sausville, K.L. Duncan, E.D.
Korn, J. Biol. Chem. 269 (1994) 14869.
[20] V. Pucovsky, R.F. Moss, T.B. Bolton, J. Physiol. 552 (2003) 119.
[21] S. Saegusa, H. Tsubone, M. Kuwahara, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 413 (2001)
163.
[22] S.S. An, R.E. Laudadio, J. Lai, R.A. Rogers, J.J. Fredberg, Am. J.
Physiol., Cell Physiol. 283 (2002) C792.
[23] M.J. Cipolla, N. Lessov, E.S. Hammer, A.B. Curry, Stroke 32 (2001)
1658.
[24] S.M. Smiley-Jewell, M.U. Tran, A.J. Weir, Z.A. Johnson, L.S. Van
Winkle, C.G. Plopper, J. Appl. Physiol. 93 (2002) 1506.
[25] K. Lange, U. Brandt, FEBS Lett. 395 (1996) 137.
[26] C.M. Ribeiro, J. Reece, J.W. Putney Jr., J. Biol. Chem. 272 (1997)
26555.
[27] P.A. Janmey, J. Kas, J.V. Shah, P.G. Allen, J.X. Tang, Biol. Bull. 194
(1998) 334.
[28] Z. Wu, K. Wong, M. Glogauer, R.P. Ellen, C.A. McCulloch, Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 261 (1999) 419.
[29] J.A. Rosado, S.O. Sage, J. Physiol. 526 (2000) 221.
[30] T.B. Bolton, S.A. Prestwich, A.V. Zholos, D.V. Gordienko, Annu.
Rev. Physiol. 61 (1999) 85.
[31] M. Nakamura, M. Sunagawa, T. Kosugi, N. Sperelakis, Am. J.
Physiol., Cell Physiol. 279 (2000) C480.
[32] N.I. Gokina, G. Osol, Am. J. Physiol., Heart Circ. Physiol. 282 (2002)
H1410.
[33] K. Obara, H. Yabu, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 255 (1994) 139.
[34] O. Baumann, B. Walz, Int. Rev. Cytol. 205 (2001) 149.
[35] L.Y. Bourguignon, N. Iida, H. Jin, Cell Biol. Int. 17 (1993) 751.
[36] Y. Wang, M.P. Mattson, K. Furukawa, J. Neurochem. 82 (2002) 945.
[37] H.T. Ma, K. Venkatachalam, J.B. Parys, D.L. Gill, J. Biol. Chem. 277
(2002) 6915.
[38] J.R. Holda, L.A. Blatter, FEBS Lett. 403 (1997) 191.
[39] M. Grimaldi, A. Favit, D.L. Alkon, J. Biol. Chem. 274 (1999) 33557.
[40] J.A. Rosado, I. Rosenzweig, S. Harding, S.O. Sage, Am. J. Physiol.,
Cell Physiol. 280 (2001) C1636.
[41] B. Somasundaram, J.C. Norman, M.P. Mahaut-Smith, Biochem. J.
309 (1995) 725.