dissertation group

Upload: torry-reynolds

Post on 04-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    1/19

    DISSERTATION GROUP: SUPPORTING

    DOCTORAL RESEARCH & COMPLETION

    Deborah J. Taub, Ph.D.

    Torry Reynolds, M.Ed.

    University of North Carolina Greensboro

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    2/19

    OVERVIEW

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    3/19

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES

    Understand the research findings aboutdoctoral completion

    Learn how a dissertation group can facilitate

    completion Explore the example of a dissertation group,

    including qualitative and quantitative

    evaluation results Discuss how to adapt this example to their own

    situations

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    4/19

    The phrase all but dissertation gives the false

    impression that the dissertation is a minor technicality,

    just another of the many requirements for obtainingthe PhD. In reality, the dissertation is perhaps the

    biggest obstacle the PhD candidate has to overcome

    (Monsour & Corman).

    Nearly 50% of all doctoral

    students fail to complete their

    degree; and, the dissertationprocess is cited as contributing

    significantly to this attrition

    problem.

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    5/19

    RESEARCH INDICATES

    CHALLENGES SUGGESTIONS

    stress

    isolation

    poor writing skills

    procrastination

    mentoring andadvising

    peer support

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    6/19

    PEER SUPPORT + MENTORING =DISSERTATION GROUP

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    7/19

    THEORIZING A DISSERTATION GROUP

    Vygotsky (1978) - sociocultural (or socialdevelopment) theory

    Liechty, Liao & Schull (2009) scaffolding helpsstudents expand from their zone of currentdevelopment (ZCD) into their zone of proximaldevelopment (ZPD)

    Wenger, McDermott & Snyder (2002) communityof practice

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    8/19

    In 2008, a UNCG Higher Eddepartment dissertation groupwas formed.

    Albold and Miller-Dyces 2011qualitative study found that groupmembers appreciated:

    plugging in to a network of

    support

    the community ofaccountability

    the means of measuringprogress

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    9/19

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    10/19

    SURVEY RESULTSDISSERTATION STAGE

    3

    18%

    4

    23%

    2

    12%

    847%

    >21 Hrs

    < 21 Hrs

    ABD

    PhD

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    11/19

    STAGE IN DISSERTATION PROCESS

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    >21 Hrs

    < 21 Hrs

    ABD

    PhD

    Diss Grp

    Enhanced

    My

    Persistence

    Id

    Participate

    if Not Reqd

    Id

    Recommen

    d Diss Grp

    I share Info

    from Diss

    Grp with

    Other Stdts

    >21 Hrs 4 4 4.33 4

    < 21 Hrs 4.25 4.75 4.75 4.5

    ABD 5 5 5 5

    PhD 4 4.14 4.53 4

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    12/19

    SURVEY RESULTS--ENROLLMENT STATUS

    Full-Time Part-Time

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    13/19

    ENROLLMENT STATUS

    4.33

    4.58

    4.83

    4.58

    3.6 3.63.8

    3.4

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Diss Grp

    Enhanced My

    Persistence

    Id Participate if

    Not Reqd

    Id

    Recommend

    Diss Grp

    I share Info

    from Diss Grp

    with Other

    Stdts

    FT

    PT

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    FT

    PT

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    14/19

    This group is what pushed

    me though. I struggle at

    times with self

    accountability, so attending

    this group kept me on

    task.

    It was a great addition to

    my PhD experience and I

    learned a lot...but it does

    not compensate for one on

    one mentorship.

    The guidance from our faculty leader

    was instrumental towards

    understanding the nature of writing a

    dissertation, understanding key steps,

    and engaging in a strategic approach to

    writing (e.g., reverse planning to help

    achieve target goals)

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    15/19

    STARTING A DISSERTATION GROUP

    Membership

    Open vs. closed

    Stage of program

    Discipline/topic

    Practical considerations

    Day/time

    Frequency

    Location Focus/style

    Individual goal-setting

    Accountability

    Supports/resources

    Books, articles, websites Examples/exemplars

    Blackboard or othercourse managementsoftware

    Group alumni, recentcompleters

    Repetition is not bad

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    16/19

    HELPFUL RESOURCES

    Dissertation Timeline Calculator(www.lib.umn.edu/help/disscalc)

    OWL @ Purdue (owl.english.purdue.edu)

    Roberts, C. M. (2010). The dissertation journey(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Single, P. B. (2009). Demystifying dissertation

    writing. Sterling, VA: Stylus. ABD Survival Guide

    (www.abdsurvivalguide.com)

    http://www.lib.umn.edu/help/disscalchttp://www.abdsurvivalguide.com/http://www.abdsurvivalguide.com/http://www.lib.umn.edu/help/disscalc
  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    17/19

    Deb Taub

    [email protected]

    Torry [email protected]

    QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ETC

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    18/19

    REFERENCES

    Albold, C., & Miller-Dyce, C. (2011, Fall). A community of scholars: The role of a peer-baseddissertation group in countering attrition and prolonged ABD status in doctoral students.Perspectives, 23(4), 13-18.

    Bair, C., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Research on doctoral student attrition and retention: A metasynthesis. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research XIX(pp. 481-534).New York, NY: Agathon.

    Bryant, M. T. (2004). The portable dissertation advisor. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Davidson, M., & Foster-Johnson, L. (2001). Mentoring in the preparation of graduate students of color.Review of Educational Research, 71, 549-574.

    Gardner, S. (2008). Whats too much and whats too little? The process of becoming anindependent researcher in doctoral education.Journal of Higher Education, 79, 326-350.

    Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessonsfrom four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 669-700.

    Holley, K. A., & Caldwell, M. L. (2012). The challenges of designing and implementing a doctoralstudent mentoring program. Innovations in Higher Education, 37, 243-235.

  • 7/31/2019 Dissertation Group

    19/19

    REFERENCES

    Liechty, J. M., Liao, M., & Schull, C. P. (2009). Facilitating dissertation completion and success among doctoralstudents in social work.Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 481-497.

    Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Lovitts, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from PhD programs.Academe,86(6), 44-50.

    Monsour, M., & Corman, S. (1991). Social and task functions of the dissertation partner: One way of avoiding terminalABD status. Communication Education, 40, 180-186.

    Peters, R. L. (1992). Getting what you came for. New York, NY: Noonday.

    Single, P. B. (2010). Demystifying dissertation writing. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard

    Business Review Press.

    Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In Mind in Society(trans. M. Cole) (pp. 79-91).Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.