distribution of chloride, ph, resistivity, and sulfate ... · pdf filereductions in test error...

Download Distribution of Chloride, pH, Resistivity, and Sulfate ... · PDF filereductions in test error associated with material properties, sample processing, ... Revise the FMs for pH, minimum

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: lynguyet

Post on 06-Feb-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Distribution of Chloride, pH, Resistivity, and

    Sulfate Levels in Backfill for Mechanically-

    Stabilized Earth Walls and Implications for

    Corrosion Testing

    BDV25-977-03

    Mr. Ivan Sokolic, Project Manager Construction Manager

    FDOT Ft. Myers Operations CenterDistrict One

    2981 N. E. Pine Island Road

    Cape Coral, Florida 33909

    Dr. Manjriker Gunaratne, Principal Investigator Chair

    Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering

    University of South Florida

    4202 E. Fowler Avenue

    Tampa, Florida 33620

    Final Report Performance Period: June 3, 2013 through May 31, 2015

    May 2015

    Prepared by

    Noreen Poor, Manjriker Gunaratne, and Thilanki Rajaguru

    University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

  • ii

    Disclaimer

    The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and

    not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation.

  • iii

    Approximate Conversions to SI Units

    SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL

    LENGTH

    mm millimeters 0.039 inches in

    m meters 3.28 feet ft

    m meters 1.09 yards yd

    km kilometers 0.621 miles mi

    SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL

    AREA

    mm2 square millimeters 0.0016 square inches in

    2

    m2 square meters 10.764 square feet ft

    2

    m2 square meters 1.195 square yards yd

    2

    ha hectares 2.47 acres ac

    km2 square kilometers 0.386 square miles mi

    2

    SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL

    VOLUME

    mL milliliters 0.034 fluid ounces fl oz

    L liters 0.264 gallons gal

    m3 cubic meters 35.314 cubic feet ft

    3

    m3 cubic meters 1.307 cubic yards yd

    3

    SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL

    MASS

    g grams 0.035 ounces oz

    kg kilograms 2.202 pounds lb

    Mg (or "t") megagrams (or "metric

    ton")

    1.103 short tons (2000 lb) T

    SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL

    TEMPERATURE (exact degrees)

    oC Celsius 1.8C+32 Fahrenheit

    oF

    *SI is the symbol for the International System of Units. Appropriate rounding should be made to comply with

    Section 4 of ASTM E380.

    (Revised March 2003)

    (Downloaded from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/aaa/metricp.cfm January 2015)

    http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/aaa/metricp.cfm%20January%202015

  • iv

    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No.

    2. Government Accession No.

    3. Recipient's Catalog No.

    4. Title and Subtitle

    Distribution of Chloride, pH, Resistivity, and Sulfate Levels in

    Backfill for Mechanically-Stabilized Earth Walls and

    Implications for Corrosion Testing

    5. Report Date

    6. Performing Organization Code

    7. Author(s) Noreen Poor, Manjriker Gunaratne, Thilanki Rajaguru

    8. Performing Organization Report No.

    9. Performing Organization Name and Address

    Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of South Florida

    4202 E. Fowler Avenue

    Tampa, Florida 33620

    10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)

    11. Contract or Grant No.

    BDV25-977-03 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address

    Florida Department of Transportation

    605 Suwannee Street, MS-30

    Tallahassee, Florida 32399

    13. Type of Report and Period Covered

    Final Report

    06/03/2013 to 05/31/2015

    14. Sponsoring Agency Code

    15. Supplementary Notes

    16. Abstract

    The ultimate goals of this research were to improve quality, speed completion, and reduce risk in mechanically-stabilized

    earth (MSE) wall projects. Research objectives were to assure (1) that variability in the corrosion properties of soil (pH,

    minimum resistivity, chloride, and sulfate levels) due to sampling and analytical technique was much lower than variability

    in these levels within and between soil sources and types and thus did not inflate the risk of emplacing a corrosive soil as

    MSE wall backfill, (2) that the number of soil type samples analyzed prior to acceptance of a backfill was appropriate, based

    on the expected distribution of corrosion properties within the backfill, and (3) that the corrosion properties of backfill

    material did not change appreciably over time, especially after emplacement and over the design lifetime of an MSE wall.

    Corrosion properties of soil were tested with Florida Methods (FMs) 5-550, 5-551, 5-552, and 5-553 for pH, minimum

    resistivity, water-soluble chloride, and water-soluble sulfate, respectively. Changes to the quality assurance (QA) plan for

    acceptance quality characteristics (AQC) of backfill corrosion properties were recommended based on research outcomes.

    These changes had as their focus an improvement in the buyers statistical power to accept good backfill material through

    reductions in test error associated with material properties, sample processing, and laboratory procedures. Recommended

    changes included (1) proposed revisions to the FMs for pH, minimum resistivity, chloride, and sulfate, (2) an increase in the

    number of independent samples tested for pH and minimum resistivity, (3) a revised acceptance limit for minimum

    resistivity, (4) method operator training and independent audits, (5) an inter-laboratory study post-implementation of the

    revised methods, and (6) re-evaluation of the need for chloride and sulfate testing for backfill above a pre-determined

    minimum resistivity. Geochemical modeling with the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) model PHREEQC for a conservative case of a low ionic strength and poorly buffered sandy backfill revealed that in a few years time the pore water

    of emplaced backfill could equilibrate with infiltrating rainfall. The model results suggested that a soils buffering capacity

    might be important consideration when metal is used as reinforcement in MSE wall backfill. Field and laboratory testing of

    candidate sands to calibrate the model were recommended ahead of any proposed changes to the QA plan based on model

    results. 17. Key Word

    Mechanically-stabilized earth (MSE) wall, corrosion, pH,

    resistivity, chloride, sulfate, select backfill, ruggedness

    study, inter-laboratory study

    18. Distribution Statement

    No restrictions.

    19. Security Classif. (of this report)

    Unclassified

    20. Security Classif. (of this page)

    Unclassified

    21. No. of Pages

    378 22. Price

    Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized

  • v

    Acknowledgments

    The authors of this report would like to express their gratitude for access to mines from which we

    collected soil samples, and we would like to thank mine owners and operators that gave us that

    access: Angelos Recycled Materials, Dade City; C. C. Calhoun, Haines City; Cemex Alico Quarry,

    Ft. Myers; Hickey Excavation, Sebring; Jahna Industries, Haines City; Titan Florida Center Sand,

    Clermont; Transcor Dirt Services, Wimauma; and Youngquist Brothers Rock Mine, Ft. Myers. We

    would also like to thank the commercial laboratories that opened their laboratories for a visit or

    participated with a split-sample analysis. These laboratories included Environmental &

    Geotechnical Specialists (EGS), Tallahassee; Ellis & Associates, Jacksonville; Universal

    Engineering Services (UES), Jacksonville; Universal Engineering Services (UES), Orlando;

    Professional Service Industries (PSI), Orlando; Madrid Engineering, Bartow; Professional Service

    Industries (PSI), Tampa; Tally Engineering, Tampa; Tierra, Tampa; Universal Engineering

    Services (UES), Tampa; Ardaman & Associates, Ft. Myers; and Professional Services Industries

    (PSI), Ft. Lauderdale. We would like to extend our sincere appreciation for the help received from

    the FDOT facilities that allowed two laboratory visits and participated in the inter-laboratory study:

    Districts 1 and 7 Materials Office Laboratory, Bartow; District 2 Materials Office Laboratory,

    Lake City; District 3 Materials Office Laboratory, Chipley; Districts 4 and 6 Materials Office

    Laboratory, Davie; District 5 Materials Office, Deland; and the State Materials Office (SMO)

    Corrosion Laboratory and Environmental Laboratory, Gainesville. The authors would like to thank

    Ingrid Eversley, Barbara Johnson, Melissa Lopez, Carol Marrero-Placeres, Julie McCoy and

    Shivali Vyas, USF College of Engineering, for their assistance with purchasing and travel. Finally,

    we would like to thank project team membersformal and informalfor their enthusiasm and

    support of this project. These team members included Project Manager Ivan Sokolic, Sam Joseph,

    Timothy Meeks, Xiaoyan Zheng, Teresa Puckett, and Angela Koloc, FDOT Districts 1 and 7

    Materials Office; Mario Paredes (retired from FDOT), David Horhota, Ronald Simmons, and

    Nikita Reed, State Materials Office; Patti Brannon and Latashi Kitchen, FDOT Research Office;

    and Corinne Walters and Stephanie Rios, USF Sponsored Research. This research would not have

    been possible without the assistance provided by courteous and professional staff of mine owners

    and operators, commercial laboratories, USF departments, and FDOT offices.

  • vi

    Executive Summary

    The ultimate goals of this research were to improve quality, speed completion, and reduce risk in

    mechanically-stabilized earth (MSE) wall projects. Research objectives