district advisory council (dac), district english learner ... advisory council (dac), district...
TRANSCRIPT
District Advisory Council (DAC),
District English Learner Advisory
Committee (DELAC), and Title I
Annual Parent Meeting
Huntington Beach City School District
February 12, 2015
Welcome!
Please share the following information with
us as your introduction:
Your name
The school you represent
Your favorite thing about your child’s
school!
Meeting Agenda
Approval of Minutes
Reports ◦ Food Services
◦ English Learners
◦ Consolidated Application Status/Updates
◦ Title I
◦ Attendance
◦ Resources
Local Control Accountability Plan
Public Comment / Advisory
Unfinished Business
New Business
Adjournment
English Learners - CELDT
School Number
Tested*
% Proficient
(Early Advanced or
Advanced)
IFEP
Candidates**
Smith 40 57.5 4
Seacliff 30 73.3 6
Eader 15 33.3 0
Peterson 76 36.8 3
Hawes 20 45.0 3
Perry 129 24.8 2
Moffett 26 76.9 4
Dwyer 84 55.9 2
Sowers 20 85.0 0 DISTRICTWIDE 440 46.1 24
Title III Program Improvement
Focuses on both State and Federal
achievement targets
Monitors progress for all students and
significant subgroups of students at both the
District and School level
Analyzes results annually to inform and focus
action steps at both the District and Site
Levels
Aligns with No Child Left Behind
requirements for 100% proficiency by 2014
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Federal accountability reporting system
Looks at the percentage of students
meeting proficiency
STAR CST and CELDT used to determine
whether a district/school has made AYP
Goals are articulated as Annual
Measurable Achievement Objectives
(AMAOs)
Title III Program Improvement
AMAO 1 - Percentage of ELs Making Annual
Progress in Learning English
# of 2013-14 Annual CELDT Takers: 366
# with Required Prior CELDT Scores: 366
% with Required Prior CELDT Scores: 100%
# in Cohort Meeting Annual Growth Target: 209
% Meeting AMAO 1 in LEA 57.1%
2013-14 Target 59.0%
Met Target for AMAO 1 - No
Title III Program Improvement
AMAO 2 - Percentage of ELs Attaining the English Proficient Level on the CELDT
Less than 5 Years Cohort
# of 2013-14 English Learners in Cohort: 306
# in Cohort Attaining the English Proficient Level: 80
Percentage in Cohort Attaining the English Proficient Level: 26.1%
2013-14 Target: 22.8%
Cohort Met Target - Yes
5 Years or More Cohort
# of 2013-14 English Learners in Cohort: 133
# in Cohort Attaining the English Proficient Level: 84
% in Cohort Attaining the English Proficient Level: 63.2%
2013-14 Target: 49.0%
Cohort Met Target - Yes
Met Targets for AMAO 2 – Yes
Title III Program Improvement
AMAO 3 - Adequate Yearly Progress for EL Student Group at the LEA Level
English-Language Arts
Met Participation Rate for English Learner student group: Yes
Met Percent Proficient or Above for English Learner student group: No
Mathematics
Met Participation Rate for English Learner student group: Yes
Met Percent Proficient or Above for English Learner student group: Yes
Met Targets for AMAO 3 No
Title III Program Improvement
Complete the Title III Plan Needs Assessment,
Plan Information Summary, Assurance documents,
and Goals/Strategies/Actions/Tasks
Upload completed documents to the California
Accountability Improvement System (CAIS)
Develop, Implement, and Monitor the Title III Plan
Maintain a record of Plan implementation by
posting updates, documents, and other evidence
into CAIS
Title III Program Improvement
Goal 2A: Annual Measurable Achievement Objective
(AMAO) 1 – Annual Progress Learning English
By June 2015, the percentage of ELs learning English will increase from 59% to 61%, in order to move toward state defined growth expectations as measured by the California English Language Development Test (CELDT). (State target for 2014-15 is 60.5%)
By June 2016, the percentage of ELs learning English will increase from 61% to 63%, in order to move toward state defined growth expectations as measured by CELDT. (State target for 2015-16 is 63%)
Title III Program Improvement
2C: AMAO3 – Reading/Language Arts
By June 2015, the percentage of administrators trained in the ELA/ELD Standards in tandem with the CCSS will increase from 0% to 100% as measured by locally developed observation tools.
By June 2015, the percentage of teachers of ELs implementing the ELA/ELD Standards in tandem with the CCSS will increase from 0% to 6% as measured by locally developed observation tools.
By June 2016, the percentage of teachers of ELs implementing the ELA/ELD Standards in tandem with the CCSS will increase from 6% to 100% as measured by locally developed observation tools.
Title III Program Improvement
Goal 2D: High Quality Professional
Development The Local Educational Agency (LEA) will provide high quality
professional development to teachers, administrators and other school
or community-based personnel to improve the education of ELs.
Goal 2E: Parent and Community
Participation The LEA will promote the involvement of parents and community
members in the education of ELs.
Key Strategies and Tasks
Implementation of Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
Teachers will provide daily ELA instruction aligned to CA Common Core State Standards. Integrated and designated English Language (ELD) development will be provided as differentiated instruction within the classroom to address English Learner student learning needs to meet grade level standards. Teachers will address language development needs to support EL student reading, writing, speaking and listening skills. This includes vocabulary development and supporting students in the language of specific subjects.
- Teacher professional development and PLCs
- Administrator CCSS training
- ELA/ELD materials
Key Strategies and Tasks
Instructional Strategies (ELD Training and DII Focus)
The District will provide support to principals and staff in aligning instruction to the ELD Framework and CCSS. OCDE is providing training and support to District instructional services staff. Principals and site administrators will then receive introduction and overview training on ELD framework to support teacher instruction. The focus of the Frameworks implementation will be differentiated instruction for English Learners, specifically the strategic use of Integrated and Designated English Language Development strategies. School staff will participate in DII professional development at the site and district level. Principal will provide focused PLC expectations and monitoring to support implementation of DII practices.
- ELD Frameworks training
- Training of Teachers
- DII Study, Coaching, and PLC Focus
Key Strategies and Tasks
Benchmark Assessments
Three district online (most grades) and paper/pencil (younger students) benchmark assessments were developed in ELA (administered three times per year) to provide formative assessment data to teachers to guide instructional planning decisions for English Learners, as well as to support monitoring of student progress and identification of students for possible participation in interventions and other classroom support systems.
- Develop online benchmark assessments
- Ongoing staff training on benchmark assessments
- Monitoring student progress
Key Strategies and Tasks
Standards Sequence Schedules
Standards sequence schedules have been developed with teacher input and are being implemented in grades 2-8, aligned to CCSS. These instructional guides have created an alignment and established teaching and learning expectations for grade level content to be instructed to all students, specifically our English Learners. The development of Benchmark Assessment blueprints was made in line with these guides to ensure the teaching and monitoring of student progress for all required grade level standards. With continued implementation of the Common Core and English Language Development Standards, the schedules will be reviewed and revised in Summer 2015 as needed to support pacing guide implementation in 2015/16 school year.
- Develop standards sequence schedules
- Monitor implementation
Key Strategies and Tasks
English Language Arts (ELA) and English Language Development (ELD) Instructional Materials Pilot & Training
It is essential for HBCSD to purchase curricular materials and assessment tools aligned to ELA Common Core State Standards and ELD Standards with appropriate interventions and supplemental resources. The research-based pedagogical shifts demanded by the new standards include deeper rigor with an increased focus in reading of informational text, the complexity of texts, academic vocabulary, and evidence-based writing. Teachers will pilot ELA/ELD curriculum before convening in committees to determine District adoption.
- Pilot new materials
- Teacher committee comprehensive review
- Adoption and implementation of ELA/ELD materials
Key Strategies and Tasks
Supplemental Services in the Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP)
Supplementary services for English Learners include assessment, notification, interventions, and professional development. EL-specific supports provided by site staff (instructional aides, classroom teachers - Read 180 & English Language Development courses) and centralized EL staff (EL Coordinator, Bilingual Instructional Aides, EL Technician). Additional supplementary programs include instructional materials, translation services, parent consultations, and progress monitoring (EL and RFEP students).
- Interventions
- Bilingual Instructional Assistants
Key Strategies and Tasks
Parent Involvement and Communication
Parent survey and events based on
responses
Social media
Web resources (website, video portal)
Interim formative report cards
EL Master Plan Updates
Updates Details Rationale
Placement Criteria [Initial Fluent English Proficient (IFEP) and Reclassified Fluent English Proficient (RFEP)]
Update for new assessments
Old assessment data no longer applicable
Assessment Procedures
Update timelines Mostly the same, new CALPADS submission dates
Program Description Update instructional materials
ELA/ELD pilot process
Staffing Coordination with Title I intervention LCAP/Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF)-EL expenditure procedure
Efficiency Other interventions (BIAs, site-specific)
EL Master Plan Updates
Updates Details Rationale
Professional Development
ELA/ELD standards Implementation of new standards, DII, and Path to Proficiency
Funding Update for LCFF New process and language
Parent letters Update and “soften language”
Form letters are compliant but need improvement (focus on growth rather than No Child Left Behind [NCLB]-like targets)
Forms Digitize and update Cost savings Faster feedback for parent notification
Home Language Survey (HLS)
Update and revise New form
Next Steps for Success Continued adherence and implementation of the
State approved Title III Program Improvement Plan and EL Master Plan.
Implementation of a skills-based intervention program for English Learners (EL), in which services are coordinated and adjusted based on student progress.
Focus on EL student opportunities to practice and reinforce language skills with the use of technology and specific curriculum.
Development of a centralized system for ongoing consultations to empower parents, focusing on EL procedures and guidelines, in addition to resources and materials that help develop linguistic skills outside of the school environment.
Application for State and
Federal Funding to Support
Students Allows the district to operate special programs to
support students not yet proficient
Provides for the district to accept State and
Federal funding to support student learning
Requires that the district meet learning targets
and submit fiscal reports on a regular basis to
ensure accountability *
June 2015 Submission Includes
2012-13 Expenditure / Obligation Reporting, 24 Months
Title II, Part A Fiscal Year Expenditure Report
Title III, Part A Immigrant YTD Obligations Report
Title III, Part A LEP YTD Obligations Report
2013-14 Expenditure / Obligation Reporting, 12 Months
Title II, Part A Fiscal Year Expenditure Report
Title III, Part A Immigrant YTD Obligations Report
Title III, Part A LEP YTD Obligations Report
June 2015 Submission Continued:
2013-14 End of Year Reporting
Title I, Part A School Funded Staff Report
Title I, Part A Parental Involvement Policies (LEA and school)
Title I, Part A School Program Improvement Activities
Title II, Part A School Class Size Reduction Report
Title III, Part A LEP Nonprofit Private School Reimbursement
Homeless Education Policy, Requirements and Implementation
Title I, Part A Nonprofit Private School Student Demographics and Services
Title I, Part A Program Improvement Expenditures and Reallocation Criteria
June 2015 Submission Continued:
2014-15 Application for Funding
Certification of Assurances
Protected Prayer Certification
Application for Funding
Other ESEA Nonprofit Private School Participation
School Student Counts Projected
Economic Impact Aid School Funding Plan
Title I, Part A Nonprofit Private School Participation
Title I, Part A Planned School Allocations
Substitute System for Time Accounting
Title I Program and Services Strong Accountability
Local Control
Choice for Parents
Effective Teaching Methods
Title I Funded Schools Dwyer Middle School
Perry Elementary
Peterson Elementary
Smith Elementary
Title I, Part A works for students!
Provides funding to support students
equally
Formalizes Parent Involvement with
District and School policies and
Compacts
Provides trainings, information and
resources throughout the school year
How do we involve parents?
Title I Site Meetings
Parent Conferences and Communication
School and Classroom Events and Activities
Volunteer Opportunities
Parent Survey – hbcsd.us
Parent survey and events based on responses
Social media
Web resources (website, video portal)
Interim formative report cards
Title I Funds Provide the Following
Services in HBCSD Extended Day Academic Learning
Programs
Intervention and Tutorial Support
Parent Involvement Activities
Additional Resources
Attendance
Clarification: Students that have more than 20 absences are considered to be chronic absentees. (~10%)
Truancy = upon the third unexcused absence or tardy in excess of thirty minutes
School Attendance Review Team (SART) meets with parents and students to create a plan to improve attendance. When unexcused absences continue, they are referred to the district’s
School Attendance Review Board (SARB) panel for hearing. The SARB meets regularly to address the attendance concerns of students who are considered truant for five or more school days.
HBCSD LCAP Goals
• Adopt CCSS-aligned materials
• Continue and expand instructional professional development
• Continue implementation of Illuminate
• Technology upgrades
• Web-based communication
• Attendance Recovery Program
• Proactive Intervention supports
• Before/After School Supports (P&D)
• Develop Library/Media Center Model (P&D)
• EL interventions (DW)