district instruction planning

15
District Instruction Planning April 29, 2013 Wm Murphy

Upload: arty

Post on 06-Feb-2016

22 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

District Instruction Planning. April 29, 2013 Wm Murphy. 2012-2013 Proportional Implementation Responsibility. 2012-2013 Proportional Implementation Responsibility. District Instructional Focus Areas. District Instructional Focus Teams. Stages of Curricular Implementation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: District Instruction Planning

District Instruction Planning

April 29, 2013

Wm Murphy

Page 2: District Instruction Planning

District

NetworkSchool

2012-2013 Proportional Implementation Responsibility

Page 3: District Instruction Planning

District

Network

School

2012-2013 Proportional Implementation Responsibility

Page 4: District Instruction Planning

District Instructional Focus Areas

Common Core"What we teach"

Quality Teaching & Learning

"How we teach"

Literacy"What/how we teach"

Culture"What we believe"

Page 5: District Instruction Planning

District Instructional Focus Teams

Common Core"What we teach"

Page 6: District Instruction Planning

6

Stages of Curricular Implementation

Pre-awareness

2-3 years from implementation

Materials and assessments aligned to state standards. Practice may be

misaligned to state standards

Build knowledge and excitement about the rationale for and format of CCSS

Initiation

2-3 years from implementation

Materials and assessments of varying degrees of alignment

Create a strategic plan. Help make meaning/assuage fear.

Page 7: District Instruction Planning

7

Stages of Curricular Implementation

Implementation

0-1 year from implementation

Partial implementation transitioning to full implementation

Evaluating progress and making necessary revisions to the strategic plan

Readiness

1-2 years from implementation

Assessments aligned to CCSS, materials continue transitioning to CCSS. Possible

partial implementation.

Focusing on program development/adoption and accessing the

full range of assessment strategies

Awareness

1-2 years from implementation

Rigor of assessments shift/increase, possible materials transitioning to CCSS

Identify, understand, and experiment with sig.instructional shifts in Math and ELA

Page 8: District Instruction Planning

• Principals acting as lead learner and meaning maker

• This content is new to everyone.

• School leaders must help the community make the transition

• District acting as organizer of support - not yet an issue of compliance.

• Everyone in the system needs to appreciate this initiative for what it is, an opportunity to reform education.

• Teachers acting learners and experimenters

• Need opportunities to learn and process these expectations

• Not just a new scope and sequence.

• Recognize this as hard work, worth doing.

8

Build Capacity for Fall 2013

Page 9: District Instruction Planning

• Look for people to go through the stages of awareness, application and experimentation, and ownership.

9

Stages of Capacity Building

August 2012

January 2013

Page 10: District Instruction Planning

10

TARGET SUPPORT TREATMENT

State Teacher Leaders

We have identified 15 support treatments ranging from individual coaching to Common Core Green Belt Certification to provide every

school with at least one teacher who is considered an expert in the new curriculum.

Green Belt Certification – School Level

14-16 Leading Educator Masters/Teacher Leader Cert

State Toolkit Training - Lafayette

State Toolkit Training 1– JP Specific

Math Text Book Adoption training

Toolkit Viewing party*

K-2 Individual School Training – State *

ANet & TFA Math and ELA Sessions*

HS CCSS Roadshow OR K-8 Central Common Core 101 *

Test Construction activity with Human Capital

MDC/LDC – HS ELA and Math State Training*

IB and AP training

Mid. Grades Summer and LAP CCSS Training

Coaching from the School Support Specialists

JASON Science Training

Investing in Educator Excellence

Page 11: District Instruction Planning

11

TARGET INITIATIVE

Principals

We have identified 12 support treatments targeting principals so

that every school leader has the skills needed to not only coach teachers in the new curriculum but help engage

them in change leadership.

Black Belt Certification – School Leader

State Toolkit Training - Lafayette

State Toolkit Training – JP Specific

Math Text Book Adoption training

K-2 Individual School Training – State

ANet & TFA Math and ELA SessionsHS CCSS Roadshow OR K-8 Central Common Core 101COMPASS norming

MDC/LDC – HS ELA and Math State Training*

IB and AP training

Mid. Grades Summer and LAP CCSS Training

JASON Science Training

Investing in Educational Leadership

Page 12: District Instruction Planning

SAMPLE ACTIVITY• State Teacher Leader (STL) Toolkit 1 (April 18 and 19)• K-2 CCSS 101 – State School Site visits (various)• High School CCSS 101 - Roadshow (various)

12

Phase 0 – Build Awareness (April – June)

Phase 1 – Build Knowledge (May – July)

SAMPLE ACTIVITY• State Teacher Leader (STL) Toolkit 2 – June 11-13• HS & MS MDC – Arizona – July 8-11

Page 13: District Instruction Planning

13

Phase 2 -

SAMPLE ACTIVITY• COMPASS norming – July 29-31• STL – CCBlackBelt Training – August 1-6

Phase 2 – Build Readiness (June – August)

Phase 3 – Build Capacity (August – December)

SAMPLE ACTIVITY•STL – CCBlackBelt Training Ongoing•STL - Leading Educators Fellows Ongoing•Twice monthly centralized offered on COMPASS skills

Page 14: District Instruction Planning

14

Performance Evaluation

Score by room Grand Total3

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.8

3.9

4

* Represents average presentation value score on a four point scale for 7 sessions held thus far by central staff and state partners.

Page 15: District Instruction Planning

15

Performance Evaluation

Question Score

1. Objectives of the training were clearly stated. 3.92

2. Objectives of the training were met. 3.88

3. Information can be applied in my work as both a teacher and a Teacher Leader. 3.90

4. Ideas and skills presented will enhance student learning/work performance. 3.85

5. Presentation was effectively delivered. 3.89

6. Materials were appropriate and useful. 3.87

7. Time was used effectively. 3.90

8. Questions and needs were addressed. 3.86

9. This training helped me acquire the intended knowledge and skills. 3.81

10. This training will integrate materials discussed in my work as a Teacher Leader. 3.81