district irrigation plan- giridih · district irrigation plan- seraikela kharsawan 2016 geo...
TRANSCRIPT
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction:
Government of India and state government of Jharkhand have initiated various
programmes for tapping rain waters in the state. To make it more efficient and cost
effective some ongoing programmes have been merged as one and termed as PRADHAN
MANTRI KRISHI SICHAI YOJANA (PMKSY). The aim of the initiated flagship
programmes is to achieve convergence of programmes at the field level. This will help
in improving the creation of assets at the village level with ease of implementation. It
will improve the ground water and surface water for use by the present society with
much of the water saved for future generations. This will also help in tackling the
phenomena of Climate change which will have much impact on the states like us, with
low adaptive capacity and competing land use patterns.
The aim of the programme is to increase investment in the irrigation infrastructure
with idea of optimum and conjunctive utilization of water resources. It will help in
increasing area under assured irrigation, improve efficiency of the existing irrigation
systems, use of precision farming technologies for meeting the growing demand for
food by the society, improve ground water recharge and aquifers, using treated waste
water for irrigation and generate more potential for investment by the various players
like corporate under their CSR programmes and main streaming of farmers for
increasing their private investment for improving on farm water use efficiency at
individual and community level.
PMKSY has been result of the merger of the ongoing schemes viz. Accelerated Irrigation
Benefit Programme (AIBP) of the Ministry of Water Resources, River Development &
Ganga Rejuvenation (MoWR,RD&GR), Integrated Watershed Management Programme
(IWMP) of Department of Land Resources (DoLR) and the On Farm Water Management
(OFWM) of Department of Agriculture and Cooperation (DAC). The scheme will be
implemented by Ministry of Agriculture, Water Resources and Rural Development.
Ministry of Rural Development is to mainly undertake rain water conservation,
construction of farm pond, water harvesting structures, small check dams and contour
bunding etc. MoWR, RD &GR, is to undertake various measures for creation of assured
irrigation source, construction of diversion canals, field channels, water diversion/lift
irrigation, including development of water distribution systems. Ministry of Agriculture
will promote efficient water conveyance and precision water application devices like
drips, sprinklers, pivots, rain-guns in the farm “(Jal Sinchan)”, construction of micro-
irrigation structures to supplement source creation activities, extension activities for
promotion of scientific moisture conservation and agronomic measures Programme
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 2
architecture of PMKSY will be to adopt a ‘decentralized State level planning and
projectised execution’ structure that will allow States to draw up their own irrigation
development plans based on District Irrigation Plan (DIP) and State Irrigation Plan
(SIP). It will be operative as convergence platform for all water sector activities
including drinking water & sanitation, MGNREGA, application of science & technology
etc. through comprehensive plan. State Level Sanctioning Committee (SLSC) chaired by
the Chief Secretary of the State with the authority to oversee its implementation and
sanction of projects.
The programme will be supervised and monitored by an Inter-Ministerial National
Steering Committee (NSC) will be constituted under the Chairmanship of Prime
Minister with Union Ministers from concerned Ministries. A National Executive
Committee (NEC) constituted under the Chairmanship of Vice Chairman, NITI Aayog to
oversee programme implementation, allocation of resources, inter ministerial
coordination, monitoring & performance assessment, addressing administrative issues
etc.
Components and responsible Ministries/ Departments:
1. AIBP by MoWR, RD &GR To focus on faster completion of ongoing Major and Medium
Irrigation including National Projects.
2. PMKSY (Har Khet ko Pani) by MoWR,RD & GR Creation of new water sources
through Minor Irrigation (both surface and ground water). Repair, restoration and
renovation of water bodies; strengthening carrying capacity of traditional water
sources, construction rain water harvesting structures (Jal Sanchay); Command area
development, strengthening and creation of distribution network from source to the
farm. Improvement in water management and distribution system for water bodies to
take advantage of available source, which is not utilised to its fullest capacity (deriving
benefits from low hanging fruits). At least 10% of the command area to under
micro/precision irrigation.
Diversion of water from source of different location where it is plenty to nearby water
scarce areas, lift irrigation from water bodies/rivers at lower elevation to supplement
requirements beyond IWMP and MGNREGS irrespective of irrigation command.
Creation and rejuvenation of traditional water storage systems like Aharas, Dobhas,
Ponds and Dams at feasible locations.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 3
3. PMKSY (Watershed) by Dept. of Land Resources, MoRD Water harvesting structures
such as check dams, nala bund, farm ponds, tanks etc. Capacity building, entry point
activities, ridge area treatment, drainage line treatment, soil and moisture conservation,
nursery raising, afforestation, horticulture, pasture development, livelihood activities
for the asset-less persons and production system & micro enterprises for small and
marginal farmers etc. Effective rainfall management like field bunding, contour
bunding/trenching, staggered trenching, land levelling, mulching etc.
4. PMKSY (Per drop more crop) by Dept. of Agriculture & Cooperation, MoA
Programme management, preparation of State/District Irrigation Plan, approval of
annual action plan, Monitoring etc. Promoting efficient water conveyance and precision
water application devices like drips, sprinklers, pivots, rain-guns in the farm (Jal
Sinchan). Topping up of input cost particularly under civil construction beyond
permissible limit (40%), under MGNREGS for activities like lining inlet, outlet, silt traps
distribution system etc.
Construction of micro irrigation structures to supplement source creation activities
including tube wells and dug wells (in areas where ground water is available and not
under semi critical /critical /over exploited category of development) which are not
supported under PMKSY (WR), PMKSY (Watershed) and MGNREGS.
Secondary storage structures at tail end of canal system to store water when available
in abundance (rainy season) or from perennial sources like streams for use during dry
periods through effective on-farm water management Water lifting devices like diesel/
electric/ solar pumpsets including water carriage pipes.
Extension activities for promotion of scientific moisture conservation and agronomic
measures including cropping alignment to maximise use of available water including
rainfall and minimise irrigation requirement (Jal sarankchan)
Capacity building, training for encouraging potential use water source through
technological, agronomic and management practices including community irrigation.
Awareness campaign on water saving technologies, practices, programmes etc.
organisation of workshops, conferences, publication of booklets, pamphlets, success
stories, documentary, advertisements etc.
Improved/innovative distribution system like pipe and box outlet system with
controlled outlet and other activities of enhancing water use efficiency.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 4
District Irrigation Plans (DIPs):
District Irrigation Plan (DIP) shall be the cornerstone for planning and implementation
of PMKSY. DIP will identify the gaps in irrigation infrastructure after taking into
consideration the District Agriculture Plans (DAPs) already prepared for Rashtriya
Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY) vis-à-vis irrigation infrastructure currently available and
resources that would be added during XII Plan from other ongoing schemes (both State
and Central), like Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee
Scheme(MGNREGS), Rashtriya Krishi Vikash Yojana (RKVY), Rural Infrastructure
Development Fund (RIDF), Member of Parliament Local Area Development (MPLAD)
Scheme, Member of Legislative Assembly Local Area Development (MLALAD) Scheme,
Local body funds etc. The gaps indentified under Strategic Research & Extension Plan
(SREGP) are be used in preparation of DIP.
DIPs will present holistic irrigation development perspective of the district outlining
medium to long term development plans integrating three components viz. water
sources, distribution network and water use applications incorporating all usage of
water like drinking & domestic use, irrigation and industry. Preparation of DIP will be
taken up as joint exercise of all participating departments. DIP will form the
compendium of all existing and proposed water resource network system in the
district.
The DIPs may be prepared at two levels, the block and the district. Keeping in view the
convenience of map preparation and data collection, the work would be primarily done
at block level. Block wise irrigation plan is to be prepared depending on the available
and potential water resources and water requirement for agriculture sector prioritising
the activities based on socio-economic and location specific requirement. In case of
planning is made based on basin/sub basin level, the comprehensive irrigation plan
may cover more than one district. The activities identified in the basin/sub-basin plan
can be further segregated into district/block level action plans. Use of satellite imagery,
topo sheets and available database may be appropriately utilised for developing
irrigation plans at least on pilot basis to begin with and subsequently extended to all
projects.
Background:
Hon’ble President in his address to the joint Session of the Parliament of 16th Lok
Sabha indicated that “Each drop of water is precious. Government is committed to
giving high priority to water security. It will complete the long pending irrigation
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 5
projects on priority and launch the ‘Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana’ with the
motto of ‘Har Khet Ko Paani’. There is a need for seriously considering all options
including linking of rivers, where feasible; for ensuring optimal use of our water
resources to prevent the recurrence of floods and drought. By harnessing rain water
through ‘Jal Sanchay’ and ‘Jal Sinchan’, we will nurture water conservation and ground
water recharge. Micro irrigation will be to ensure ‘Per drop-More crop’. Out of about
141 m.Ha of net area sown in the country, about 65 million hectare (or 45%) is
presently covered under irrigation. Substantial dependency on rainfall makes
cultivation in unirrigated areas a high risk, less productive profession. Empirical
evidences suggest that assured or protective irrigation encourages farmers to invest
more in farming technology and inputs leading to productivity enhancement and
increased farm income. The overreaching vision of Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee
Yojana (PMKSY) will be to ensure access to some means of protective irrigation to all
agricultural farms in the country, to produce ‘per drop more crop’, thus bringing much
desired rural prosperity.
Vision:
To use the available water resources in the district to the maximum potential in an
efficient way catering to the basic needs of every living being and enhancing the
livelihoods of rural population to the maximum extent thus alleviating poverty in a
sustainable way without compromising the interests of future generations.
Objective:
The broad objectives of PMKSY will be:-
Achieve convergence of investments in irrigation at the field level (preparation
of district level and, if required, sub district level water use plans).
Enhance the physical access of water on the farm and expand cultivable area
under assured irrigation (Har Khet ko pani).
Integration of water source, distribution and its efficient use, to make best use of
water through appropriate technologies and practices.
Improve on-farm water use efficiency to reduce wastage and increase
availability both in duration and in extent.
Enhance the adoption of precision-irrigation and other water saving
technologies (More crop per drop).
Enhance recharge of aquifers and introduce sustainable water conservation
practices.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 6
Ensure the integrated development of rainfed areas using the watershed
approach towards soil and water conservation, regeneration of ground water,
arresting runoff, providing livelihood options and other NRM activities.
Promote extension activities relating to water harvesting, water management
and crop alignment for farmers and grass root level field functionaries.
Explore the feasibility of reusing treated municipal wastewater for peri-urban
agriculture.
Attract greater private investments in irrigation.
This will in turn increase agricultural production and productivity and enhance farm
income.
Strategy /Approach:
To achieve above objectives, PMKSY will strategize by focussing on end-to end solution
in irrigation supply chain, viz. water sources, distribution network, efficient farm level
applications, extension services on new technologies & information etc. Broadly, PMKSY
will focus on:-
Creation of new water sources; repair, restoration and renovation of defunct
water sources; construction of water harvesting structures, secondary & micro
storage, groundwater development, enhancing potentials of traditional water
bodies at village level.
Developing/augmenting distribution network where irrigation sources (both
assured and protective) are available or created;
Promotion of scientific moisture conservation and run off control measures to
improve ground water recharge so as to create opportunities for farmer to
access recharged water through shallow tube/dug wells;
Promoting efficient water conveyance and field application devices within the
farm viz, underground piping system, Drip & Sprinklers, pivots, rain-guns and
other application devices etc.
Encouraging community irrigation through registered user groups/farmer
producers’ organisations/NGOs.
Farmer oriented activities like capacity building, training and exposure visits,
demonstrations, farm schools, skill development in efficient water and crop
management practices (crop alignment) including large scale awareness on
more crop per drop of water through mass media campaign, exhibitions, field
days, and extension activities through short animation films etc.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 7
The aforesaid areas only outline the broad contours of PMKSY; combination of
interventions may be required depending on location specific conditions and
requirements, which will be identified through District and State Irrigation Plans.
Methodology:
The preparation of District Irrigation plan is an integration of geospatial technology,
Space application technologies and spatial and non-spatial data.
Transformation of available thematic information (district provided Gyan data)
on to the village level on Bhuvan portal and extract geo-referenced village map
data.
Integration of thematic layers with socio-economic data for classification of area
into specific composite land units on village level.
Preparation of appropriate action plan based on potential of composite land
units and developmental needs of study area is on the basis of available data.
Field visit to validate the recommended measures with respect to the ground
situation and requirement of the local people.
Finalization of development plans based on field observation.
Available thematic information for preparation for water resource and land resource
development plan.
Landuse / land cover map
Groundwater potential map
Soil map - depth, texture, erosion and land capability
Slope map.
High resolution Satellite mage through Bhuvan portal.
Lithology.
Hydro geomorphology.
Area for development of water resources structure geospatial technology has been used
in this process first identify the area of crop land based on high resolution satellite data
and then identify the irrigated area by different source of irrigation methods. To
identify the un irrigated area an overlay method is used. District irrigation plan covers
the fallowing planning component of the district in sustainable development approach :
Increase in vegetation/biomass in the district.
More number of surface water bodies in district.
Shift from annual crop to perennial.
Increase in the extent of crop area.
Improvement in the soil moisture availability
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 8
Reclamation of waste lands.
Convergence of investments in irrigation at the field level.
Enhance the physical access of water on the farm and expand cultivable area
under assured irrigation (Har Khet ko pani)
Best use of water through appropriate technologies and practices.
Improve on-farm water use efficiency.
Enhance the adoption of precision-irrigation and other water saving
technologies
(More crop per drop).
Enhance recharge of aquifers and introduce sustainable water conservation
practices.
Ensure the integrated development of rainfed areas.
Promote extension activities relating to water harvesting, water management
and crop alignment for farmers and grass root level field functionaries.
Explore the feasibility of reusing treated municipal waste water for peri-urban
agriculture,
Attract greater private investments in irrigation.
Summary of the plan:
To put it precisely Seraikela Kharsawan district has a cumulative water demand of 2.43
BCM. In the district 1.55 BCM water is already available in existing water bodies. The
district needs to create additional water storage of 0.8832 BCM. For meeting the
requirement district has put a plan to construct 8968 Ponds, 21338 Dovas, 877 check
dams/Stop dams along with SMC works in 8000 Ha area to improve ground water
recharge. Drip irrigation will be installed in 15400 units along with sprinklers in 15400
units. It has also been planned to promote drip irrigation and sprinkler irrigation using
water saving measures like mulching to reduce wastage of agriculture byproducts and
improve the water use efficiency.
Sector wise water gap is biggest for agriculture followed by industry. Other sectors like
power generation require 0.06 BCM, domestic water demand stands at 0.0087 BCM.
This has been based at an assumption that domestic water requirement will grow at
20% keeping in mind the decadal population growth,
Making at the block level Adityapur block has highest water gap standing at 0.21 BCM
and lowest at Kukru block standing at 0.03 BCM.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 9
Overall the district will achieve it at a cost of Rs 184637.96 Lakhs INR which will help in
meeting the water gap.
The challenge that the plan has to address is to produce more food under more hostile
conditions in the wake of the looming challenge of the climate change. The state action
plan on the climate change has forecasted the reduction in rain fall beyond 2020 under
A1B scenario with increase in temperature. It puts district in a situation where it has to
harness the opportunities that exist currently.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 10
CHAPTER- 1 District profile:
1.1 General features of the district.
In the year 1620, Kumar Bikram Singh I, the third Maharaja Jagannath Singh, established the Seraikela state, which was merged with Bihar state after independence and ranked as subdivision merged with the boundaries of Kharsawan state. Later on the basis of territories act in 1950, 39 villages of Chandil, Nimdih and Tamar area were included into it.
Seraikela has become the "Mecca" for connoisseurs of music and dance. Here lies the
citadel of world famous Chhau dance. The soil of Seraikela is vibrant with the rhythm of
"Chhau" which fancied the imaginations of not only Indian art lovers, but also allured
and captivated art lovers across the world, due to its grace unique charm and grandeur.
Surrounded by lush green forests, hillocks, serpent like rivers and rivulets, Seraikela
Town is situated on the bank of Kharkai River. The district has not only a rich cultural
heritage but also has large deposits of minerals like Kyanite,Asbestos, quartz etc. and
other valuable minerals. The district also includes the Adityapur Industrial Area which
is one of the biggest industrial areas in Asia. Its development in Bihar was lackadaisical
but after formation of Jharkhand state it has been made a district and many
development plans have been started to strengthen its economic structure. Titirbilla
bridge on the road joining Seraikela Rajnagar, the bridge on Tikar River at Ichagarh,
causeway at Shakha river outlines the developing steps of the district . The road joining
the distant rural areas, blocks and district headquartes are being built. Tube wells ,
tanks and dams are being built for the source of drinking water and irrigation . The
older canals are also being renovated . Ayurvedic medical college, Private engineering
College, Hospitals and ITI for women are being planned to be established for its
educational development. New development programs have been taken up in all eight
blocks of the district. The government has announced the district as a tourist center as
it has many historical and sightseeing places. The day is not very far off when Seraikela
will become an important district and a center of tourist attraction .
History of Seraikela Kharsawan District:
The state was founded in 1620 by Raja Bikram Singh (a forerunner to the ruling family's
current nomenclature of Singh Deo), a descendant of the rulers of Porahat, who claimed
descent from the Rathore clan of Rajputs. The state came under the influence of
the Maratha rulers of Nagpur in the 18th century, and became a princely state of British
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 11
India in 1803, at the conclusion of the Second Anglo-Maratha War at Deogaon of Orissa.
After the war, the East India Company included the Saraikela princely state under the
governance of the Chhota Nagpur Commissioner.
In 1912 Saraikela came under the authority of the province of Bihar and Orissa, which
was newly created from the eastern districts of Bengal. In 1936 the state was placed
under the authority of the Orissa Province. Saraikela, along with 24 other princely
states of the Eastern States Agency, acceded to the Government of India on 1 January
1948, with a will to merge the princely state with Orissa province of the Indian
Republic.
As a result both Saraikela and Kharsawan princely states were merged with Orissa in
1948. On 1 January 1948 itself, the tribals of these two princely states, who were in a
majority, revolted against the merger with Orissa. This was supported by Patayet Sahib
Maharajkumar Bhoopendra Narayan Singh Deo, third son of HH Raja Aditya Pratap
Singh Deo, as a result of which he was imprisoned to ensure the popular movement
died down. The central government appointed a commission under Mr. Baudkar to look
into the matter. On the basis of the Baudkar commission report, Saraikela and
Kharsawan princely states were merged with Bihar on 18 May 1948. These two
princely states became part of Jharkhand when the state was separated from Bihar on
15 November 2000. From 18 May 1948 onward, many non-tribal Oriyas of the districts
ofSaraikela Kharsawan, East Singhbhum, and West Singhbhum have migrated and
settled permanently in Orissa
Geography of Seraikela Kharsawan District:
The district is situated between 22°29'26" and 23°09'34" north latitudes and 85°30'14"
and 86°15'24" east longitudes.
Chhau Dance of Seraikela Kharsawan District:
Definition of Chhau Dance and the word meaning of Chhau: -
The Chhau Dance follows the basic principles of Hindu Dance. Chhau Dance is prevalent not only in Seraikela but also in the same form or the other in many parts of Orissa and West Bengal.
The word Chhau is interpreted in different ways by different quarters and persons: -
In the opinion of Late Bijay Pratap Singh Deo of Seraikela who was an architect of Chhau dance of Seraikella school, Chhau is a masked dance, the motif of which has been drawn from the mythological picturesque.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 12
In the opinion of some people "Chhau" is a dialect which meams six faces, Viz. fore head, eyes, nose, cheeks, lips and chin and a mask bears the six parts of the face. The word "Chhau" ordinarily means mask and because the dance is performed by use of mask, it is called "Chhau Dance".
According to yet another school of thought the word "Chhau" has been derived from the Sanskrit word "Chhabi" which means image or picture. Several others say that as the dance is characterized by variety it is called Chhau dance and therefore the word meaning of "Chhau" is Chhabila in Sanskrit and fancy or picturesque in English.
According to Sitakanta Mohapatra (I.A.S.), Chhau is concocted pronunciation of the word Chhauni (Military Barrack or Cantonment). In his views, the militia man (Paikas) staged and performed in Chhauni (cantonments) for amusement during leisure time and enjoy their success or victory in battle field, so the people called it as "Chhauni dance", Which in course of time has changed to Chhau dance by mispronunciation.
RITUALS
"Chhau" dance flourished at eight Akhadas on the basis of Parikhanda and is not only the means of recreation but is related with the religion beliefs of the people. 13 Bhaktas from different sects of society with "Stubble Bhat" in last 13 days of the month of Chaitra start with "Habissanna" in this function and the dance starts in last four days with "Yatra Ghat" and concludes in the last night with "Kalika Ghat".
HISTORY
The beginning of Chhau dances is lost in hoary past and the rulers have been intimately associated with religious festivals known as "Chaitra Parva" celebrated every year for several centuries. Not only have they been actively associated with religious festivals, they have nurtured the art of dance. They have nurtured the art of dance that blossomed underthe royal patronage. Invariably every year the Chhau dances are performed during the spring and members of the royal family and commoners dance together without distinction of rank and creed. The prince and pauper join each other freely and express their feelings through dance. In early days the dancers used masks of bamboos and gourds and these dances were related with mythological tales of Mahabharata, Ramayana and the life and nature of human beings. Later on masks made of paper mache were used.
The present style of dance is given to its shape by the untiring efforts of Kunwar Bijay Pratap Singhdeo in 1920s. Hence after he is said to be the Father of Modern Saraikela Chhau. Since 1938, Seraikella Chhau dance has added to it's glory by exhibiting the dance to corners of far and near till this date.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 13
The Govt. has given new dimension to the art and culture by establishing state Chhau Dance Centre. The in exhaustive effort of the dancers of Chhau; Seraikela keeps a special position in global world of art.
Our country is predominantly based on religion. People worship different Gods and Goddesses to invoke their blessings to ward off evils. To please the Gods, there was necessity of rejoicing through music and dance in harmony with rituals.
As such the Chhau dance in general and that of Searikela in particular relates this dance with the worship of Lord Shiva in the month of "Chaitra" (Mid April) ushering spring when the hearts of the people are filled with cosmic joy in tune with the "Basant Ritu" the spring.
SARAIKELA CHHAU
The Chhau dance of Searikela is a traditional dance from with classical base. The Chhau dance of Seraikela is a highly specialized masked dance having a rich cultural heritage.
The word 'Chhau' is derived from the Sanskrit word 'Chhaya' meaning 'shade image mask' which is an essential features of this art. In Seraikela Chhau, the mask in the center of attraction, Vachikabhinaya is absent and the elements of speech there is greater scope for expression through mime and body language. Different Bhavas (Moods) and Rasas (sentiments) are exquisitely expressed through the movements of the limbs in Chhau. The Searikela Chhau has evolved from a distinct martial art called "Pharikhanda" play of (sword and shield) and has a few distinguished manners of execution. The style, posture, movements and footwork confirms to positive martial art from bestowed with grace. In this dance form the mask covers the face exerting the dancers to express his Bhava (Mood) and Rasa (sentiments) through body movements like Siro Bhedo (Head gesture) and Griba Bhedo (neck gesture) leaving no room for "Dristi Bhedo" (eye movements and glances).
Natya Shastra enumerates one hundred eight (108) Karanas. In Seraikela these are known as upalayas or uphle, make up basic vocabulary in Chhau dance uphlu (meaning lips and motion).
The music of Chhau in many cases is based on the ragas of the Hindustani classical music as also from folk lure. In some cases it has been borrowed from the composition of outstanding Oriya poets of the past where some cases folk melodies (Dashi) are utilized.
Chhau dance is essentially open-air offer; all the special instruments used for the accompaniment emit loud or sharp songs. Traditional musical instrument used for Chhau in Clude Dhol, Nagara or Dhumsa (kettle dance), Jhanj (brass cymbals), flute, Mohuri, conch shells, Turi and Bheri (Long bamboo pipes) some classical music instruments like Shenal, Veena, Pakhwaj, Mridanga etc.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 14
The subject of matter of Chhau assumed artistic proposals and it's themes are drawn from great epics ?The Ramayana and Mahabharata, Nature and human existence giving rise to dances like Duryodhan ?Urubhanga "Goda Yuddh"(club duel) Astra Dwanada (sword duel) and the sort.
Nature played a significant role in the composition of dance numbers like Mayur (Peacock ? the glorious national bird), Hansa (swan) Prajapati (Butterfly), Sagar(ocean) and all that.
The historical episodes like "Rani of Jhansi"(Laxmibai), Hamara Desh Mahan added in 1995 shows interesting features of the art.
Romance is equally incorporated in the art "sringar" sentiments play a Dominant role in the numbers like "Barsa ghama ghama"(when rains pours in showers)."chandra bhaga"(the eternal love of sun god with maiden chandrabhaga) depicting in episode a "Konark" in Orissa? kach debjani in the lyrics of immortal visvakabi Rabindra Nath Tagore "Biday Abhisaap" has been portrayed to render a romantic and so and so forth.
The great choreographer and a dozen of this celebrated art Kumar Bijay Pratap Singh Deo the illustrious brother of late Maharaja Aditya Pratap Singh Deo is hailed to be the author of the latest treasure in Chhau dance style by invoking the elements of lasya (feminine grace) in its original. To the development of chhau are the most evolved and have a well-structured grammar. The Mayurbhanj Chhau is a beautiful mosaic comprising elements from folk, martial and classical art. The dancers uses basic steps "Topkas", Ufils, Chali.
The word Chhau, now obsolete means to attack stealthily in Oriya.A few derivative words of Chhau such as Chhauri and Chhaurani and Chhamka (meaning resopectively the armor, a military camp and the quality of attacking stealthily) are in still in currency. The rudimentary Chhau dance in Mayurbhanj was called rook-maar ?naacha, literally meaning: the dance of defense and attack.
In Mayubhanj (Orissa) Chhau the great exponents are shri Madan Mohan Lenka ,Sri Hari Nayak recipient academy awards by the president of India.
MANBHUM (PURULIA) CHHAU
This is perhaps the best-known style of Chhau largely due to it energetic and dramatic characteristics. As regards the masks and the mask-makers of Manbhum Chhau much as already been described and discussed.
he vigorous aspects of Purulia Chhau are based illustrated in a series of Asura masks having a fierce countenance and painted bright green and red. In general the range of colour used to symbolize character types in framework and giving a classical touch assisted by local ustad.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 15
Performers of different school's of chhau have achieved World Wide acclamation and bestowed with national and international trophies.
It is worthwhile to mention that living legend late Rajkumar Suddhandra Narayan Singh Deo (Seraikela chhau) who was honoured with PadmashreeAward by the president of India, Guru Kedar Nath Sahu recipient of academy award from the president of India are brilliant exponents of Seraikela style. Ustad Bikram Kumbhkar exponent of Seraikela chhau is a recipient of academy award from the president of India.
MAYURBHANJ CHHAU
Chhau is usually though to be a mask dance. However, that performed Baripada in Mayurbhanj, Orissa, does not use any distinctive masks though the face remains quite immobile. The Mayurbhanj chhau the movements are quite vigorous. Maintaining the basic spirit and style of chhau dance the rulers of Mayurbhanj, cultivated the chhau dance to develop it to a unique from with the support the Govt.
Mayurbhanj chhau seems to be closely related to Seraikela chhau. Because the two Guru's/Ustad had gone to Mayurbhanj and trained the Pharikhanda style dance/martial art name Upendra Biswal and Banamali Das. Seraikela and Mayurbhanj were princely states and their rulers extended enthusiastic patronage. consistent with that used in other forms of traditional Indian performing arts. Purulia masks with towering headgears are more dramatic influenced by the Jatra/theatre of Bengal, Purulia/Manbhum.
Chhau vibrates with a powerful theatrically and imparts to the dance mythical episodes a rare kind of palpability. The themes are drawn from Ramayana (written by Krittibas) and mahabharata or the mythological character. The music of Manbhum chhau in many cases based on the folk melodies and Jhoomer and musical instrument are Dhol, Nagara, and Mahuri etc.
The Manbhum school exhibit of vigorous body movements acrobatics their vigorous dance forms suggests martial origin of Chhau much akin to military exercises.
The revered master and choreographers Guru Gambhir Singh Munda and Nepal Mahto of Mnbhum/Purulia school are greatest exponents of the art and recipient of Padmashree from the president of India.
KHARSAWAN CHHAU
The Kharsawan chhau does not used in any masks except in a single item "Ganesh Bandana" in which mask is used to represent the facial expressions of lord Ganesh. Once a time Kharsawan was also a princely state. The Kharsawan style of chhau dance is in fact a product of fashion of the Mayurbhanj and Purulia style of Chhau. The Kharsawan style of chhau is also a martial art form. The purity of the martial art form
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 16
has been preserved by these indigenous people of this area who constant exchange among the villagers and the communities. It is more modern form owes much to the active intervention of the kings of Kharsawan. Unfortunately these style is not very popular due to some circumstances.
The main three style Seraikela, Mayurbhanj and Manbhum/Purulia are recognized but Kharsawan till date not recognized. Whether Kharsawan Chhau is very beautiful. The movements chali locomotion ufles and steps are full of the velour and dynamism. The costumes and appearance of these dancers are very distinctive.
The music of Kharsawan chhau in many cases based on local folk melodies of and jhoomur. The Kharsawan chhau also used Dhol, Dhumsa, mohuri etc. which traditional musical instrument.
It in significant that not only Seraikela but all the different style of chhau culminate in a festival called CHAITRAPARVA celebrated on the last day of the month of Chaitra. Corresponding with April.The festival proper begins with the Jatraghat ceremony whenever the chaitraparve or the Chhau dance performed whether it is in Seraikela, Mayurbhanj, Kharsawan and Purulia/Manbhum. The jatraghat ceremony must be performed.
The underlying rituals (lord Shiva and Shakti) of the chaitraparava are the same as those of the "DANDAJATRA" or "DANDANATA"
The Chhau dance is of the people By the people and for the people Dance of mother of arts Music and poetry exists in time
District has an area of 281500 ha with agriculture area standing at 52.82 % of the TGA,
forest standing at 28.20 % of the TGA, 4.03% area under different built ups, 4.33% area
under water bodies and 10.59% area under wasteland. Average cropping intensity of
the district is 108%. According to the 2011 census Seraikela Kharsawan district has
a population of 1,063,458. This gives it a ranking of 428 th in India (out of a total
of 640). The district has a population density of 390 inhabitants per square kilometre
(1,000/sq mi). Its population growth rate over the decade 2001-2011 was 25.28%.
Saraikela Kharsawan has a sex ratio of 956 females for every 1000 males, and a literacy
rate of 68.85%. District receives an annual rainfall of 1300 mm with 70 to 80 number of
rainy days spread across 4 moths with July- August month receiving most of the rain
fall. Based on the rainfall and area of the district it receives a total volume of 1.21 BCM
water, currently district is able to store only 1.55 BCM water in the existing water
storage structures and rest flows through the rivers and rivulets.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 17
District at a glance: Table-1
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 18
Administrative set up:
The district comprises of nine blocks, namely Adityapur, Gamharia, Serikela, Kharswan,
Chandil, Ichagarh, Kukru, Gobindpur and Kuchai. As per Census 2011, the district has
1271 villages, 137 Panchayats, 9 Blocks and 2 sub divisions. Census 2011 figures
indicated that the percentage share of scheduled caste population to total population
was 5.27 percent while that of scheduled tribes was 35.17 percent. Based on the
number of total rural households in Census 2011 and BPL Revision Survey of 2010-11
the percentage of BPL households in rural area is 57.85 percent.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 19
1.2 Demography of the District
Demographic Dynamics in district when seen from a wider perspective have larger
implication on the Sustainable Development. The population growth has been marked
at almost 25% over the last decade which means it requires more infrastructure
support, more health services and accordingly more resources for the same. It will also
have implications on a number of important issues in the area of urbanization,
migration and development, and on some important variables which impact on their
interrelationships. In the villages most of the households are headed by male members
where as some of the families are headed by women members. Mostly women members
head family when male guardian is not there. It some cases it is also because of greater
awareness among the women members especially who have been members of the
SHGs. Acceptance of women as head of the family has limited acceptability which needs
to be seen from the gender perspective. This watershed is dominated by people from
other communities. The share of SCs and STs Communities accounts for 40 % of total
population.
The district is dominated by the people from OBC and general category but tribals and
scheduled caste people also have sizable population. Population of the other
communities stands at 60% followed by STs whose population is at 35% and SCs at 5%.
SC population is highest at Adityapur block and STs population is highest at Gobindpur
Gender ratio of the district stands at 956. Gender ratio is best at Gobindpur which is at
1004 and lowest at Adityapur. Average family size of the district is close to five.
Graph-1
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 20
Table-2
Block SC ST Others
Kuchai 921 50169 13230
Kharsawan 6847 35371 46424
Chandil 7755 47748 102446
Ichagarh 6357 26804 49938
Adityapur(Gamharia) 17520 64421 227131
Saraikela 6479 40264 47016
Gobindpur(Rajnagar) 2918 71976 61706
Kukru 3345 8467 41164
Nimdih 4053 29422 45164
Total 56195 374642 634219
Graph-2
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 21
Graph-3
1.3 Bio Mass and Livestock details
Biomass has been used by mankind for cooking and space heating since time
immemorial. While the gaseous fuels like LPG and natural gas have replaced biomass in
cities and most urban homes, half of the world’s population and about72% of rural
households in the state continue to depend on coal or biomass like wood, crop residues,
cattledung and charcoal for their cooking and heating needs. Data from Census, 2011
indicates more than 95% of all households in Seraikela Kharsawan rely on traditional
energies for their cooking needs (Figure 4). Graph-4
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 22
A major part of the household energy consumption is for cooking. Traditional
cookstoves or chulhas, which have efficiencies less than 10% and are known to be
sources of large quantities of pollutants, are used by most rural households in the
developing world for cooking. The large fuel consumption of these chulhas results in a
large amount of time spent in collecting fuel by these households. In such households,
women and children are often exposed to high levels of pollutants, for 3 to 7 hours daily
over many years. There are strong evidences to show the relation between exposure to
such emissions and acute respiratory infections in children, with estimated two- to
three-fold increase in incidence and mortality due to the exposure to these emissions.
Recently, there have been reports on the effect of black carbon released due to unclean
combustion in cookstoves, on climate change. Therefore, development and
dissemination of cookstoves that lead to reducing fuel consumption, cooking time, and
indoor air pollution can effectively contribute to improving the quality of life of rural
women and also contribute to climate change mitigation.
Table-3
Blocks HH
Total fuel requirement
Proportion using fuel wood
Requirement in Tons In KGs In Tons
Kuchai 13405 61160312.5 61160.31 0.99 60475.32
Kharsawan 17664 80592000 80592.00 0.91 73330.66
Chandil 32088 146401500 146401.50 0.67 98572.13
Ichagarh 18673 85195562.5 85195.56 0.97 82409.67
Adityapur(Gamharia) 65423 298492438 298492.44 0.28 83458.49
Saraikela 19147 87358187.5 87358.19 0.68 59071.61
Gobindpur(Rajnagar) 26173 119414313 119414.31 0.81 96355.41
Kukru 11784 53764500 53764.50 0.97 52210.71
Nimdih 16875 76992187.5 76992.19 0.93 71856.81
Total 221232 1009371000 1009371 677740.79
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 23
Graph-5
1.3.1 Green cover:
Carbon is the most important element supporting the existence of life on earth. It also
contributes to the green house gases and its concentration in the atmosphere. Bio mass
estimation based forest management is the key epilogue of Kyoto protocol of United
Nations Framework convention on climate change (UNFCC). Regeneration or
afforestation programme taken up by different nations decides the efforts to neutralize
demand and supply gap for carbon emitted and sequestrated.
Study conducted by institutions reveals that the naturally dominant tree species in
forest of Jharkhand are Shorea robusta, Madhuca indica, Madhuca latifolia, Semicarpus
anacardium, Buchnania lanzen where as in the Trees outside forest (TOF) Anacardium
occidentale, Eucalyptus spp, Pongania piñata and Acacia spp dominate. Estimation in
several district for tree species was found to be at 67.56 ton/ha. On the basis of
individual tree species contribution of carbon sequestration Madhuca indica
(0.207t/tree) supersedes Shorea robusta (0.140 t/tree) in forests where as in TOF
Eucalyptus (0.407t/tree) and Mangifera indica (0.294t/tree) contributes maximum.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 24
Graph-6
Graph-7
Availability of fuel wood:
95% of population in Seraikela Kharsawan continues to depend on biomass for their cooking
needs. The cooking devices used by majority of them have very poor thermal efficiency and
serious health impacts due to unclean combustion. While past few decades have seen a lot of
interest the world over in development of better cookstoves for burning biomass, the
magnitude of the problem is still a major cause of concern. In India, a lot of resources went
into the National Programme on Improved Cookstoves between 1985 and 2004 with mixed
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 25
experiences. Learning from this programme, a need has been felt to start a new initiative on
biomass cookstoves with a different approach considering the changes that have taken place
in the society, technology and the global concerns.
Crop Biomass yield:
Biomass used for cooking involves fuel wood, crop residues, coal and cattle dung. If we see situation
in Seraikela where based on the crop production and collection efficiency along with crop residue
ratio calculated after deducting the crop residue used for cooking, it indicates that we are in a
position to use large volume of crop residue is still available for use as mulching material or to be
used a compost for improving the soil texture and moisture retention ability of soil. It can also add
carbon to soil which works as binding material and reduces erosion.
Table-4
Crop Type of residue
Area under
production (Ha)
Crop to residue
ratio
Collection efficiency
Production Residue volume
Residue collected
Remaining after fuel
Pigeon pea
Stalk 9480 1:04 60% 189600 758400 455040 438840.58
Maize Maize stalk
6900 1:02 60% 103500 207000 124200 119778.48
Paddy Paddy straw
99000 1:02 60% 1188000 2376000 1425600 1374848.6
Wheat Wheat husk
3600 2:03 60% 54000 81000 48600 46869.84
Total 1535100 3422400 2053440 1980337.5
Fodder Yield: Table-5
Crop Residue Balance after Fuel use
Used as fodder
Maize Maize stalk 119778.48 29944.62
Paddy Paddy straw 1374848.64 687424.32
Wheat Wheat husk 46869.84 35152.38
Fodder Availability 1541496.96 752521.32
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 26
Graph-8
Graph-9
Livestock Details:
In the rural settings one of the important contributors to the family income are live
stocks. These not only support agriculture but also work as buffer for the family during
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 27
stress period. Role of the milch animals has been important despite of the fact that
yield/animal remains very low. People are of the opinion that they keep milch animals
not for milk but for purpose of getting dung and also draught animals. Among the
blocks Adityapur, has got the highest number of milch animals. Per animal yield has
been an average 1.9 liter/animal. Lowest number of milk animals is in Kukaru with the
average yield of 1.5 liter/animal. This can be linked to the availability of water for
irrigation and drinking. Villages having higher animals and yield are having more
number of water bodies. This has resulted in greater cropping intensity and higher
availability of green fodder.
Water plays an important role in livestock productivity. Livestock productivity in
pastoral areas depends greatly on the availability of water. There are several factors,
which determine water balance, water turnover and functions of the animal.
Assessment of livestock and water requirement is helpful in modelling water and
livestock relationships.
The demand for meat, dairy products and eggs rises faster than the demand for crops;
thus both scenarios call for livestock production to increase relatively more rapidly
than crops. The world livestock system is broadly divided into pastoral grazing, mixed
farming and industrial systems (Sere and Stienfeld 1996). Estimate of the current
demand of 1.7 billion tons of cereals and 206 million tones of meat in developing
countries could rise by 2020 to 2.5 to 2.8 billion tones of cereals and to 310 millions of
tons of meat (IFPRI 2000). Water is used by the herbivore as a medium for physical and
chemical energy transfer, namely for evaporative cooling and intermediary metabolism
(Konandreas and Anderson; King 1983; Kirda and Riechardt 1986). Livestock and
poultry water consumption depend on a number of physiological and environmental
conditions such as:
• Type and size of animal or bird.
• Physiological state (lactating, pregnant or growing)
• Activity level.
• Type of diet-dry hay, silage or lush pasture.
• Temperature-hot summer days above 25 0C can sometimes double the water
consumption of animals.
• Water quality - palatability and salt content.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 28
Table-6
Large Animals Draft Animal
(Buffalo/Yak/Bulls
/any other (Nos.)
Indigenous
Cow (Nos.)
In descriptvie
Buffalo
(Nos.)
Seraikela 14242 1573 9494
Adityapur 10241 3062 13495
Rajnagar 6802 952 16934
Kharsawan 15316 811 8420
Kuchai 13340 1370 10396
Chandil 13575 2196 10161
Ichagarh 12688 3658 11048
Nimdih 14581 1931 9155
Kukru 17123 4080 6613
Total 117908 19633 119650
Graph- 10
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 29
Table-7
Small Animals
Pigs
(Nos.)
Goats
(Nos.)
Sheeps
(Nos.)
Seraikela 2790 26215 8452
Adityapur 4914 34626 4863
Rajnagar 1094 37355 12506
Kharsawan 1809 22751 7111
Kuchai 1242 31108 6714
Chandil 2166 38530 5114
Ichagarh 1092 17229 6080
Nimdih 927 28275 3702
Kukru 2371 13711 5325
Total 18405 249800 59867
Table-8
Birds
Poultry
(No.)
Ducks
(No.)
Seraikela 71082 3500
Adityapur 87198 4785
Rajnagar 12811 11722
Kharsawan 78945 4280
Kuchai 81556 1826
Chandil 97685 2199
Ichagarh 47309 2716
Nimdih 90196 4421
Kukru 33939 13629
Total 600721 49078
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 30
Graph- 11
Milk production: Table- 9
Cow Buffalo Milk Production
Seraikela 14242 1573 29228
Adityapur 10241 3062 30671.5
Rajnagar 6802 952 14963
Kharsawan 15316 811 27029
Kuchai 13340 1370 26860
Chandil 13575 2196 31342.5
Ichagarh 12688 3658 37322
Nimdih 14581 1931 31526.5
Kukru 17123 4080 46084.5
Total 117908 19633 275027
Potential evapo-transpiration;
Water foot printing is a useful tool to assess future consumption of water for
production of crops and consumers based products that give a forecast of water
demand on regional or national basis. The global consumption of water is doubling
every 20 years, more than twice the rate of human population growth. An FAO estimate
puts that 70-80 per cent of the increase in food demand between 2000 and 2030 will
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 31
have to be met by irrigation (OECD, 2008). Irrigated agriculture is practiced on about
300 million hectares only or 20 per cent of the cultivable area (FAO, 2010), but
contributing substantially with more than 40 per cent of world’s food production.
Irrigation can reduce the risks associated with the unpredictable nature of rainfed
agriculture in dry regions. It helps to insulate farming from droughts that are predicted
to occur more frequently. Efficient water use can increase crop diversity, produce
higher yields, enhance employment and lower food prices (IFAD, 2008). Irrigated
agriculture offers great potential for economic growth and poverty reduction.
Considering the dominant role of irrigated agriculture in global water use, management
practices that increase the productivity of irrigation water use can greatly increase the
availability of water for other human and environmental uses (Tiwari and Dinar, 2002).
Evaporation demand or potential evaporation is projected to increase almost
everywhere in the world in future climate scenarios (IPCC, 2008). This is because the
water holding capacity of the atmosphere increases with higher temperatures, but
relative humidity is not projected to change markedly. As a result water vapor deficit
increases in the atmosphere as does the evaporation rate. Thus, the process of
evapotranspiration (ET) is of great importance in present and future climates. The
measurement of ET from a crop surface is a very difficult and time consuming task.
In spite of the efforts of numerous scientists, reliable estimates of regional ET are
extremely difficult to obtain mainly because of its dependence on soil conditions and
plant physiology, so that advances in the knowledge of the underlined interactions and
it’s all round influence have been few and far between. Because of its complexity, the
concept of potential evapotranspiration (PET) has been introduced, which is largely
independent of soil and plant factors but has shown dependent on climatic factors.
Temporal variations of PET and quantification of its trend can serve as a valuable
reference data for the regional studies of hydrological modeling, agricultural water
management, irrigation planning and water resource management as demonstrated by
Liang et al. (2010).
Potential evapotranspiration
Potential evapotranspiration is defined as “the rate of evapotranspiration from an
extensive surface of 8 to 15 cm tall, green grass cover of uniform height, actively
growing, completely shading the ground and not short of water” (Doorenbos and Pruitt,
1977). As the definition suggests that the PET is for a grass reference ETo. The concept
of reference ET is being used to avoid ambiguities associated in the definition of PET
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 32
(Jensen, 1974 and Perrier, 1982). Reference ETo refers to ET from a vegetative surface
over which weather data are recorded and allows to develop a set of crop coefficients to
be used to determine ET for other crops. By adopting reference ETo, it has become
easier to select crop coefficients and to make reliable ET estimates in new areas. The
use of ETo – crop coefficient approach has been largely successful in obviating the need
to calibrate a separate ET equation for crop and stage of growth (Jensen et al., 1990). In
the present investigation short grass as defined by Doorenbos and Pruitt (1977) is
considered as reference crop and PET values estimated by any method is in reference to
that.
Measuring Potential evapotranspiration
The measurement of PET from a grass surface maintained as per specifications is very
difficult and time consuming process. However, different approaches to measure the
same can be listed as:
1. Water budgeting technique.
2. Direct soil water measurement (Gravimetric, neutron probe, TDR etc).
3. Hydrologic budget (mass balance) method.
4. Lysimetric(Weighing, non-weighing, drainage lysimeters) measurement.
5. Indirect meteorological (Bowen ratio and eddy correlation) methods.
6. Chamber techniques.
7. Biological (Sap flow technique, Porometer, photometer) methods.
8. Passive (Pan evaporation) methods.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 33
Table-10
PET estimating method Annual Southwest Monsoon Northeast Monsoon
a b r R2 SEE a b r R2 SEE a b r R2 SEE
Open pan 1.51 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.7 1.8 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.8 1.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.6
Penman -0.3 1 1 0.9 0.2 -
0.07 0.9 1 1 0.2 -0.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.3
Hargreaves -0.1 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.43 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.8 -0.3 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.5
Turc -8.4 1 0.6 0.3 0.7 -
23.1 2.1 0.7 0.5 0.8 -1.7 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.6
Thornthwaite -0.9 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.7 -
5.64 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.58 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.6 Blaney-Criddle 2.36 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 2.85 0.2 0.9 0.8 0.4 1.73 0.1 0.7 0.5 0.5 Christiansen Pan 1.51 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.76 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.8 1.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.6 PET from Open pan 1.53 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.77 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.9 1.35 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.6
Table-11
PET estimating method
Winter Summer
a b r R2 SEE a b r R2 SEE
Open pan 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.5 2.35 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.8
Penman -0.3 1 1 1 0.1 -
0.36 1 1 1 0.2
Hargreaves -0.5 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.5 -
0.16 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.8
Turc -1.7 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.7 -
7.06 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.9
Thornthwaite 0.42 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.7 1.13 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.9 Blaney-Criddle 1.56 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 3.31 0.1 0.7 0.5 0.8 Christiansen Pan 0.66 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 2.33 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.9 PET from Open pan 0.61 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 2.38 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.9
Source; CRIDA-Hyderabad
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 34
HYDROMETEROLOGY
The climate of Seraikela Kharsawan district can be divided into three distinct seasons in
a year, viz. winter, summer and monsoon seasons. Winter commences from late
November and continues till the end of February. January is the coldest month of the
year. Winter is characterized by heavy dew, thick fog and associated cold wave when
mercury drops down to as low as 30C to 40C. May is the hottest month of the year. The
rainy season commences from the middle of June and continues till the end of
September. The beginning of monsoon is marked by dust storms, thunder and lightning.
The district receives a larger share of the annual rainfall mainly by the south west
monsoon during the rainy season and from the retreating monsoon during the inter
monsoon period which originates in the Bay of Bengal. The district receives most of the
annual rainfall during the monsoon period.
Relative humidity is the lowest during the summer months when it can be as low as
30% in the afternoon. In the night humidity is relatively high.
Light north westerly prevails during the winter and summer months. Towards the end
of the summer season wind begins to blow more and more from directions between
north-east and south-east. These wind strengthen and predominately during monsoon.
Dust storms occur occasionally in April and May.
2.1 Location and Extent
Saraikela district is located in southeastern part of the state. It is bounded by the
Purulia district of west Bengal state in the north, Ranchi district in the west, West
Singhbhum district in south and East Singhbhum district in south east and East. Total
geographical area of the district is 2725 sq. km and population of 8,48,307 persons
(Census of India, 2001). The district comprises two subdivision (Saraikela and Chandil)
and eight development blocks viz. Govindpur, Adityapur, Saraikela, Kharsawan, Kuchai,
Idhagarh, Chandil and Nimdih.
2.2 Physiography, Geology and Drainage
This area is dominated by hilly ranges, valleys and plateaus. Hilly and steeply sloping
area are under dense forest cover. Dalma hills ranges are stretched from Chandil
towards Ghatsila. Geologically the area is comprised of Archean lava, laterite and pre-
cambrian fold mountains. Major river flowing in the district is Kharkai.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 35
2.3 Climate
The district receives an annual rainfall of 1500 mm. and most of the rainfall occurs
during the rainy season. The mean annual temperature remains at about 260C. The
temperature ranges from 160C in winter months to 440C in summer months.
2.4 Agriculture and Land Use
More than 40 per cent area of the district is under forest. The forest is full of kendu
leaves, bamboo, sal, teak and other timber species. The hilly areas are mostly under
forest with patches of cultivation on scarp areas. The valley land in the district provides
suitable site for agricultural use. Major crops grown in the district are rice, oilseed and
pulses.
2.5 Soils
The soils occurring in different landforms have been characterised during soil resource
mapping of the state on 1:250,000 scale (Haldar et al. 1996) and three soil orders
namely Entisols, Inceptisols and Alfisols were observed in Saraikela district (Fig.1 and
table 1). Alfisols were the dominant soils covering 53.8 percent of TGA followed by
Inceptisols (26.5 %) and Entisols (17.4 %).
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 36
Table-12
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 37
SOIL ACIDITY AND FERTILITY STATUS
Soil Reaction
Soil pH is an important soil property, which affects the availability of several plant
nutrients. It is a measure of acidity and alkalinity and reflects the status of base
saturation. The soils of the district have been grouped under seven soil reaction classes
according to Soil Survey Manual (IARI, 1970).
The soil pH ranges from 4.5 to 6.6. The soil reaction classes with area are given in table
13 and figure 2. The data reveals that soils of majority area are acidic (96.1 % of TGA),
in which 42.9 percent area is strongly acidic, 24.2 percent very strongly acidic, 23.1
percent moderately acidic and 5.9 percent slightly acidic in reaction. Soils of 1.6 percent
area of the district are neutral in reaction.
Soils under different reaction classes
Table-13
Soil reaction Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
Very strongly acidic (pH 4.5 to 5.0) 659 24.2
Strongly acidic (pH 5.1 to 5.5) 1169 42.9
Moderately acidic (pH 5.6 to 6.0) 628 23.1
Slightly acidic (pH 6.1 to 6.5) 162 5.9
Neutral (pH 6.6 to 7.3) 43 1.6
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
Organic Carbon
The effect of soil organic matter on soil properties is well recognized. Soilorganic matter
plays a vital role in supplying plant nutrients, cation exchange capacity, improving soil
aggregation and hence water retention and soil biological activity.
The organic carbon content in the district ranges from 0.26 to 1.55 %. They are mapped
into three classes i.e., low (below 0.5 %), medium (0.5-0.75%) and high (above 0.75 %)
(Table 14 and Figure 3). From table 3 it is seen that 60.4 percent area of the district
shows high organic carbon content. Medium and low organic carbon content constitute
22.2 and 15.1 percent area respectively.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 38
Table 14 Organic carbon status
Organic carbon % Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
Low (below 0.50 %) 411 15.1
Medium (0.50-0.75 %) 605 22.2
High (above 0.75 %) 1645 60.4
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
Macronutrients
Nutrients like nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) are considered as
primary nutrients and sulphur (S) as secondary nutrient. These nutrients help in proper
growth, development and yield differentiation of plants and are generally required by
plants in large quantity.
Available Nitrogen
Nitrogen is an integral component of many compounds including chlorophyll and
enzyme essential for plant growth. It is an essential constituent for amino acids which is
building blocks for plant tissue, cell nuclei and protoplasm. It encourage aboveground
vegetative growth and deep green colour to leaves. Deficiency of nitrogen decreases
rate and extent of protein synthesis and result into stunted growth and develop
chlorosis.
Available nitrogen content in the surface soils of the district ranges between 183 and
611 kg/ha and details are given in table 15 and figure 4. Majority soils (80.2 % of TGA)
of the district have medium availability of nitrogen (280-560 kg ha-1) and soils of 12.4
percent area have low available nitrogen content (<280 kg ha-1).
Table 15 Available nitrogen status in the surface soils
Available nitrogen KG/ha Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
Low (below 280) 337 12.4
Medium (280-560) 2185 80.20
High (above 560) 139 5.1
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 39
Available Phosphorus
Phosphorus is important component of adenosine di-phosphate (ADP) and adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP), which involves in energy transformation in plant. It is essential component of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), the seat of genetic inheritance in plant and animal. Phosphorous take part in important functions like photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, crop maturation, root development, strengthening straw in cereal crops etc. The availability of phosphorous is restricted under acidic and alkaline soil reaction mainly due to P-fixation. In acidic condition it get fixed with aluminum and iron and in alkaline condition with calcium. Available phosphorus content in these soils ranges between 0.8 and 25.1kg/ha and their distribution is given in table 5 and figure 5. Data reveals that majority of the soils are low (94.9 % of TGA) followed by medium (2.7 % of TGA) and high (0.1 % of TGA) content of available phosphorous..
Table 16 Available phosphorous status in the surface soils
Available phosphorous Kg/ha Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
Low (below 10) 2585 94.90
Medium (10-25) 74 2.7
High (above 25) 2 0.10
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
Available Potassium
Potassium is an activator of various enzymes responsible for plant processes like
energy metabolism, starch synthesis, nitrate reduction and sugar degradation. It is
extremely mobile in plant and help to regulate opening and closing of stomata in the
leaves and uptake of water by root cells. It is important in grain formation and tuber
development and encourages crop resistance for certain fungal and bacterial diseases.
Available potassium content in these soils ranges between 43 and 420 kg/ha and
details about area and distribution is given in table 17 and figure 6. The data reveals
that most of the soils (64.8 % of TGA) have medium available potassium content (108-
280 kg ha-1). Soils of 27.4 percent area are low (below 108) and 5.5 percent area are
high (above 280 kg ha-1) in available potassium content.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 40
Table 17 Available potassium status in the surface soils
Available potassium Kg/ha Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
Low (below 108) 746 27.40
Medium (108-280) 1765 64.80
High (above 280) 150 5.5
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
Available Sulphur
Sulphur is essential in synthesis of sulphur containing amino acids (cystine, cysteine
and methionine), chlorophyll and metabolites including co-enzyme A, biotin, thiamine,
or vitamin B1 and glutathione. It activates many proteolytic enzymes, increase root
growth and nodule formation and stimulate seed formation.
The available sulphur content in the soils ranges from 0.36 to 81.67 mg kg-1 and details
about area and distribution is given in table 18 and figure 7. Soils of 40.9 percent of the
area are low (<10 mg kg-1) whereas soils of 26.2 and 30.6 percent area are medium (10-
20 mg kg-1) and high (>20 mg kg-1) in available sulphur content respectively..
Table 18 Available sulphur status in the surface soils
Available Sulphur mf/Kg Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
Low (<10) 1244 25.2
Medium (10-20) 1169 23.7
High (>20) 2472 50
Miscellaneous 56 1.1
Total 4941 100
Micronutrients
Proper understanding of micronutrients availability in soils and extent of their
deficiencies is the pre-requisite for efficient management of micronutrient fertilizer to
sustain crop productivity. Therefore, it is essential to know the micronutrients status of
soil before introducing any type of land use.
Available Iron
Iron is constituent of cytochromes, haems and nonhaem enzymes. It is capable of acting
as electron carrier in many enzyme systems that bring about oxidation-reduction
reactions in plants. It promotes starch formation and seed maturation.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 41
The available iron content in the surface soils ranges between 14.9 and 96.8 mg kg-1. As
per the critical limit of available iron (> 4.5 mg kg-1), all the soils are sufficient in
available iron. They are grouped and mapped into four classes. Majority of the soils
(60.5 % of TGA) have available iron between the range of 50 to 100 mg kg-1. The details
of area and distribution is presented in table 19 and figure 8.
Table 19 Available Iron status in the surface soils
Available iron mg/kg Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
<15 101 3.7
15-25 177 6.5
25-50 735 27
50-100 1648 60.50
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
Available Manganese
Manganese is essential in photosynthesis and nitrogen transformations in plants. It
activates decarboxylase, dehydrogenase, and oxidase enzymes.
The available manganese content in surface soils ranges between 9.6 and 48.8 mg kg-1.
As per the critical limit of available manganese (> 2 mg kg-1), all the soils are sufficient
in available manganese. They are grouped and mapped into three classes. Soils of 83.8
% area of district have available Mn content between 25 and 50 mg kg-1. The details of
area and distribution are presented in table 20 and figure 9.
Table 20 Available manganese status in the surface soils
Available manganese mg/kg Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
<10 19 0.70
25-Oct 359 13.2
25-50 2283 83.80
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
Available Zinc
Zinc plays role in protein synthesis, reproductive process of certain plants and in the
formation starch and some growth hormones. It promotes seed maturation and
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 42
production.
The available zinc in surface soils ranges between 0.44 and 5.70 mg kg-1. They are
grouped and mapped into five classes. Soils of Majority of soils (94.1 % of TGA) are
sufficient (>0.5 mg kg-1) whereas soils of 3.6 percent area are deficient (<0.5 mg kg-1) in
available zinc. The details of area and distribution are presented in table 21 and figure
10.
Table 21 Available zinc status in the surface soils
Available zinc mg/kg Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
<0.5 98 3.6
0.5-1.0 439 16.10
1.0-2.0 1188 43.60
2.0-3.0 632 23.20
3.0-6.0 304 11.20
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
Available Copper
Copper involves in photosynthesis, respiration, protein and carbohydrate metabolism
and in the use of iron. It stimulates lignifications of all the plant cell wall and is capable
of acting as electron carrier in many enzyme systems that bring about oxidation-
reduction reactions in plants.
The available copper status in surface soils ranges between 0.16 and 8.62 mg kg-1. They
are grouped and mapped into six classes. Majority of soils (92.3 % of TGA) have
sufficient amount of available copper (>0.2 mg kg-1) and soils of 5.4 % area are deficient
in available copper (<0.2 mg kg-1). The details of area and distribution are presented in
table 22 and figure 11.
Table 22 Available copper status in the surface soils
Available copper mg/kg Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
<0.2 147 5.4
0.2-0.5 38 1.4
0.5-1.0 112 4.1
1.0-2.0 400 14.7
2.0-4.0 847 31.10
4.0-6.0 1117 41
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 43
Available Boron
Boron increases solubility and mobility of calcium in the plant and it act as regulator of
K/Ca ratio in the plant. It is required for development of new meristematic tissue and
also necessary for proper pollination, fruit and seed setting and translocation of sugar,
starch and phosphorous etc. It has role in synthesis of amino acid and protein and
regulates carbohydrate metabolism.
The available boron content in the soils ranges from 0.02 to 3.03 mgkg-1 and details
about area and distribution is given in table 23 and figure 12. The critical limit for
deficiency of the available boron is <0.5. Soils of 54.9 percent area of district are
deficient (<0.50 mgkg-1) whereas 42.8 percent area are sufficient (>0.50 mgkg-1) in
available boron content.
Table 23 Available boron status in the surface soils
Available Boron mg/Kg Area in 000 ha % of the TGA
<0.25 694 25.4
0.25-0.50 802 29.4
0.50-0.75 555 20.40 >0.75 610 22.40
Miscellaneous 64 2.3
Total 2725 100
SUMMARY
The soil pH ranges from 4.5 to 6.6. Soils of majority area are acidic (96.1 % of TGA), in
which 42.9 percent area is strongly acidic, 24.2 percent very strongly acidic, 23.1
percent moderately acidic and 5.9 percent slightly acidic in reaction. Soils of 1.6 percent
area of the district are neutral in reaction. Organic carbon content in the district ranges
from 0.26 to 1.55 %. Soils of 60.4 percent area of the district shows high organic carbon
content. Medium and low organic carbon content constitute 22.2 and 15.1 percent area
respectively.
Available nitrogen content in the surface soils of the district ranges between 183 and
611 kg/ha. Majority soils (80.2 % of TGA) of the district have medium availability of
nitrogen and soils of 12.4 percent area have low available nitrogen content. Available
phosphorus content in these soils ranges between 0.8 and 25.1 kg/ha. Majority of the
soils are low (94.9 % of TGA) followed by medium (2.7 % of TGA) and high (0.1 % of
TGA) in available phosphorous content. Available potassium content in these soils
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 44
ranges between 43 and 420 kg/ha. Soils of majority area (64.8 % of TGA) have medium
vailable potassium content. Soils of 27.4 percent area are low and 5.5 percent areas are
igh in available potassium content. The available sulphur content in the soils ranges
from 0.4 to 81.7 mg kg-1. Soils of 40.9 percent of the area are low whereas soils of 26.2
and 30.6 percent area are medium and high in available sulphur content respectively.
Soils are analyses for available (DTPA extractable) micronutrients and seen that all the
soils are sufficient in available iron and manganese whereas soils of 3.6 and 5.4 percent
area are deficient in available zinc and copper respectively. The available boron content
in the soils ranges from 0.02 to 3.03 mgkg-1. Soils of 54.9 percent area of district are
deficient (<0.50 mgkg-1) whereas 42.8 percent area are sufficient (>0.50 mgkg-1) in
available boron content.
Drainage
The principal rivers of the district are Subarnrekha and Kharkhai Rivers. The general
trend of the drainage is from NW-SE.and SW-SE. The structural features particularly the
foliation and joints exert profound impact upon the drainage and control the drainage
pattern of the district.
Studies/Activities carried out by CGWB
Central Ground Water Board has carried out hydrogeological surveys and ground water
exploration in the district. Ground water regime monitoring is carried out 4 times
annually from 7 HNS wells in the district. Water samples are collected during the month
of May to study the changes in water quality along with monitoring of pre-monsoon
water level.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 45
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 46
Depth to Water level
During May 2012, the depth to water levels in HNS wells tapping shallow aquifer
ranged from 5.23 to 12.20 m bgl. Depth to ground water levels during the post monsoon
period (November 2012) varied between 0.89 and 5.60 m bgl.
Categorization of depth to water level of pre-monsoon period (May 2012) for HNS in
Saraikela district is presented below in table.
Categorization of depth to water level of post-monsoon period (November 2012) for
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 47
HNS in Saraikela district is presented below in table.
Aquifer Parameters
A total of 18 exploratory wells, 04 piezometers and 06 observation wells have been
drilled down to depth of 202 m in hard rock formation to decipher the potential
fracture zones. The morphotectonic analysis of crystalline formation has revealed that
rocks have been subjected to several stages of deformation leading to development of
deep seated tensile and shear fracture. The most potential fracture zones trend along
NNE-SSW, WNW-SSE and NW-SE direction. The exploratory data reveals presence of
potential fractures between 18-109 mbgl. The thickness of the weathered zone varies
from 7 to 30.6.5m. The yield of the well is in the range of 2.52-27.53m3/hr
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 48
Summarised hydrogeological data of exploratory drilling in the district is given in table
below.
Ground Water Quality
Ground water in the phreatic aquifers in Saraikela district slightly alkaline in nature,
which is also colourless, odourless . The specific electrical conductance of ground water
in phreatic zone during May 2011 was in the range of 655 -2408 μS/cm at 25ºC. The
suitability of ground water for drinking purpose has been evaluated on the basis of pH,
Total hardness (T.H), Ca, Cl, F and NO3. The chemical concentration of these
constituents, when compared with the drinking water specification recommended by
IS:10500,1991 as presented below in table.
Number of samples exceeding permissible limit in the district.
Status of Ground Water Development
In the rural areas the entire water supply is dependent on ground water. Ground water
development is mainly carried out in the district through dug wells and Hand pumps. In
general dug wells are of 2 m diameter and the depth ranges between 8 to 15 m
depending on the thickness of the weathered zone, tapping the shallow aquifer in the
weathered zone and uppermost slice of the basement. Large number of dug wells used
for drinking water is under private ownership for which there is no reliable data. Over
the years Mark II/ Mark III hand pumps are being drilled in large numbers for ground
water development. These hand pumps have the following two major advantages i) less
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 49
susceptible to contamination from surface sources and ii) tap fractures between 20-
60m depth which have been found to be less affected by seasonal water level
fluctuation and thus have lesser chances of failure even during extreme summer. In
rural areas of Saraikela district the number of hand pumps drilled by PHED is 12311 of
which 9342 are under working condition. There are 574 dug wells constructed by
government departments that are under regular use.
In the urban areas ground water plays a supplementary role in water supply, the major
supply being made through dams, reservoirs or weirs across rivers or streams. No
authentic data is available on the number of ground water structures catering the urban
water supply.
As per the latest ground water resource estimation carried out adopting GEC 97
methodology, the overall stage of ground water development in Saraikela district has
been found to be 11.71 % indicating enough scope for future development. The ground
water resources of Saraikela district is given in the table.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 50
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development - Ranchi Page 51
GROUND WATER RELATED ISSUES & PROBLEMS
Some of key ground water related issues are
a) Locating suitable sites for bore wells
b) Suitable design of dug wells and hand pumps
c) Taking up artificial recharge projects to augment the resource availability in Godda
district
d) Optimal development of irrigation potential by developing ground water available
for future uses:
e) Creating public awareness for conserving ground water through awareness camps,
NGO’s and mass media.
As the district suffers from water scarcity, it is recommended to take artificial recharge
at suitable locales. On the basis of the hydrogeological criteria such as post monsoon
water level below 7 m bgl indicating availability of sufficient space in the unsaturated
zone to retain additional water and availability of surplus surface runoff. In the hard
rock areas, pin pointing suitable sites for bore wells is always a challenge. Considering
the anisotropy in distribution of fractures at deeper level, suitable sites may be selected
using remote sensing techniques in association with geophysical and hydro-geological
investigations.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 52
Soil Erosion
Soil erosion is a naturally occurring process that affects all landforms. In agriculture, soil
erosion refers to the wearing away of a field's topsoil by the natural physical forces of
weather and wind or through forces associated with farming activities such as tillage.
Erosion, whether it is by water, wind or tillage, involves three distinct actions – soil
detachment, movement and deposition. Topsoil, which is high in organic matter, fertility
and soil life, is relocated elsewhere "on-site" where it builds up over time or is carried "off-
site" where it fills in drainage channels. Soil erosion reduces cropland productivity and
contributes to the pollution of adjacent watercourses, wetlands, and lakes.
Soil erosion can be a slow process that continues relatively unnoticed or can occur at an
alarming rate, causing serious loss of topsoil. Soil compaction, low organic matter, loss of
soil structure, poor internal drainage, salinisation, and soil acidity problems are other
serious soil degradation conditions that can accelerate the soil erosion process. The greater
the intensity and duration of a rainstorm, the higher the erosion potential. The impact of
raindrops on the soil surface can break down soil aggregates and disperse the aggregate
material.
Lighter aggregate materials such as very fine sand, silt, clay and organic matter are easily
removed by the raindrop splash and runoff water; greater raindrop energy or runoff
amounts are required to move larger sand and gravel particles.
Soil movement by rainfall (raindrop splash) is usually greatest and most noticeable during
short-duration, high-intensity thunderstorms. Although the erosion caused by long lasting
and less-intense storms is not usually as spectacular or noticeable as that produced during
thunderstorms, the amount of soil loss can be significant, especially when compounded
over time.
Data of soil erosion is not available for this district as remote sensing based soil erosion
potential map and data attached and there is no sedimentary monitoring station.
Landuse
Concept of Landuse
Landuse is a function of four variables, land, water, air and man, each plays in its own role
in composing its life history. Land constitutes its body, water runs through its veins like
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 53
blood, air gives it oxygen and man acts as the dynamic actor to reflect its types, pattern and
distribution. Land varies in altitudes, forms and expressions. Man has played his part on
land to portray the different phases of his ties with it. The Homo-sapiens moved from one
topography to another where climate, flora and fauna also changed. He used land, flora and
fauna to fit his limited wants. Men multiplied, their wants increased and become complex,
the uses of land also increased, methods and technology also changed. Man was making his
own map on the face of the earth to portray his link, adaptation, creation and destruction.
Man has cleared the forest for shifting (Jhum) cultivation. He then used the land for large-
scale farming, small-scale farming, intensive farming, mixed farming, dry farming, etc. He
has used the land for one crop or another is a minor landuse problem, but to use each plot
of land for the right cultivation under optimum conditions to obtain optimum yield is a
significant problem. Man has learnt the use of grasslands, semi-arid and arid lands to his
own advantage by applying improved methodology and utilisation of his accomplishments.
Over a period, geographic pattern of agricultural landuse are the outcome of concurrent
interaction between the variable combinations of natural condition and human
circumstances. Primarily, these are influenced by natural condition and thereafter affected
by human circumstances because of their colonizing capability. The human circumstances
are mainly responsible for dynamism in agriculture landuse or changing cropland
occupancy.
Therefore, efficient cropland occupancy, say cropping pattern, implies the most successful
use of agriculture land, consequent upon development of irrigation facilities and
application of modern methods of farm technology. The key to the most important aspect
of landuse lies in the relation of population to land. The crux of the review, there fore,
refers to the study of the problems in use of land by man. According to R.H. Best, the term
land use deals with the spatial aspects of human activities on the Land and with the way in
which the land surface is adapted or could be adapted, to serve human needs. This leads
one back to the village farm and farmer, to the fields, gardens, pastures, fallow land, forest
and to the isolated farmstead (Freeman, 1960). The land use shifts from agricultural uses to
residential, industrial, transportation, neighbourhood retail and service activities due to
urbanization. A true nature of these dynamic qualities in land use emerges from a historical
survey designed to reveal the successive development of inherent characteristics of land
because 'some changes are short lived whereas others represent a more constant demand'
(Jackson, 1963).
Land Use Classification
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 54
The conservation and development of land resource is in area needs special focus. It needs
well thought and rational planning, which in turn depends upon minute observation of land
use pattern. The aim of this study is clear visualization of local land environment. The
intense and focused study of the details of land use puts us in a position to conserve the
important elements of the nature, which otherwise lead in a direction of destruction and
consequently threaten the social strata. The present study focuses mainly on dimension,
which is very important from the sustainability point of view that is distribution of
different groups of land use, i.e. their ratios in the region. Therefore, it becomes very
complex and diversified to study all the groups available at micro-level, homogenous
groups are generalized to reduce the number of groups, and these simplified groups of land
use are called generalized land use classification.
World Land Use Classification mainly recognizes nine categories. These are Settlement and
Associated Non Agricultural Land, Horticulture, Tree and Permanent Crops, Crop Land,
Improved Permanent Pasture, Improved Grazing Land, Wood Land, Swamps and Marshes,
Unproductive Land.
In India, a standard classification system is yet to develop. National Atlas and The land use
classification presented by All India Soil and Land Use Survey 1970 is as follows:
1. Forest Land (F) F1 Without Canopy F2 Sparse Forest F3 General Forest F4 Fully
Stocked Top Canopy
2. Cultivated land (CC) C1 Single Cropped C2 Double Cropped C3 Triple Cropped
3. Terraced Land (T) T1 Poorly Bounded Land T2 Poor Terracing Measures T3 Bench
Terraces 4. Waste Land (W) W1 Fit for Cultivation W2 Unfit for Cultivation
5. Pasture Land (P) P Pasture and Grazing Land H Hay Land When the Grass
Periodically Cut P1 With Young Shrubs P2 With Well Grows Shrubs T Thorny Lands and
Heavy Canopy Shrubs.
Land use classification by Statistical Department of Government of India.
I. Geographical Area - Area calculated by Survey Department.
II. Reported Area (Statistical area related to land use)
1. Forest .
2. Land not Available for Cultivation .
a) Land Put to Non- Agricultural Use.
b) Barren and Uncultivable Land.
3. Other Uncultivable and excluding Fallow Land.
a) Permanent Pastures and Other Grazing Land.
b) Miscellaneous Tree Crops and Gardens.
c) Culturable Waste Land.
4. Fallow Land a) Fallow Other than Current Fallow b) Current Fallow
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 55
5. Cultivated Land a) Net Sown Area, b) Area Sown More Than Once.
I. Net Irrigated Area.
II. Total Irrigated Area.
The analysis of land use in the present study is based on district statistical magazine, data
available at block level and revenue office. Following categories of land use have been
recognised in the study area. In the analysis of land use pattern study has been adopted at
block level: Forest Cover, Barren and cultivable waste land, Current Fallow land, Other
Fallow land, Barren & uncultivable Land, Land put to non-agricultural Use, Pastures and
Grazing Land, Area under bush, forest & garden, Net area sown.
Built-Up Land
It is an area of human habitation developed due to non-agricultural use and that has a
cover of buildings, transport and communication, utilities in association with water,
vegetation and vacant lands. For delineating built – up land built up polygons interpreted
under settlement.
Built-up Land (Urban)
All places with a municipality, corporation or cantonment or which are notified as town
areas and all other places which satisfy the criteria of a minimum population of 5000, at
least 75 per cent of whose male working population is non-agricultural and having a
density of population of at least 400 per sq. km. are placed under this category (Census of
India). It comprises areas of intensive use with much of the land covered by intensive use
and covered by structures. It includes residential, recreational, public & semi-public,
transportation, communication and isolated areas such as parks, playgrounds, open spaces
and vegetated areas.
Built-Up Area (Rural)
These are the lands used for human settlement and are of size comparatively less than the
urban settlements of which more than 80% of the people are involved in the primary
activity of agriculture. All the agricultural villages covering 5 hectares area and more are
included in this category. These are the built-up areas, smaller in size, mainly associated
with agriculture and allied sectors and non-commercial activities with population size less
than 5000, generally lack supporting facilities that are unique to urban areas like hospitals,
industries (large and medium scale), institutional etc. They appear in dark bluish green in
the core built-up area and bluish in the periphery; the size varies from small to big;
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 56
irregular and discontinuous in appearance; can be seen in clusters con-contiguous or
scattered.
Agricultural Land
These are the lands primarily used for farming and for production of food, fiber, and other
commercial and horticultural crops. It includes land under crops (irrigated and unirrigated,
fallow, plantations etc.).
Cropland
These are the areas with standing crop as on the date of satellite overpass. Cropped areas
appear in bright red to red in color with varying shape and size in a contiguous to
noncontiguous pattern. They are widely distributed in different terrains; prominently
appear in the irrigated areas irrespective of the source of irrigation.
Forest
These are the areas bearing an association predominantly of trees and other vegetation
types (within the notified forest boundaries) capable of producing timber and other forest
produce. They comprise of thick and dense canopy of tall trees, which can be evergreen,
semi evergreen or deciduous (moist/dry/thorn). Evergreen forest includes both coniferous
and tropical broadleaved evergreen species and predominantly remains green throughout
the year. Semi-evergreen is a forest type that includes a combination of evergreen and
deciduous species with the former dominating the canopy cover. Deciduous forest types
are of predominantly composed of species, which shed their leaves once a year, especially
during summer. They exhibit bright red to dark red in color in varying sizes, smooth to
medium texture depending on the crown density, contiguous to non-contiguous in pattern
based on their location. The size can be irregular and discontinuous occupying medium
relief mountain/hill slopes within the notified areas. Forest blank are the openings amidst
forest areas, devoid of tree cover, observed as openings of assorted size and shapes as
manifested on the imagery. They appear in light yellow to light brown in tone, generally
small in size. They possess regular to irregular shape, scattered in the forested areas. Most
of these areas are seen along hill tops/slopes midst forest areas. Forest blanks are also to
be included in this category.
Dense/Closed
This category includes all the areas where the canopy cover/density is more than 40%.
Open/Degraded
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 57
This category includes all the forest areas where the canopy cover/density ranges
between 10 – 40%.
Wastelands
Wasteland is described as degraded land which can be brought under vegetative cover with
reasonable effort and which is currently underutilized and land which is deteriorating for
lack of appropriate water and soil management or an account of natural causes. Wastelands
can result from inherent / imposed disabilities such as by location, environment.
Dense Scrub
These areas possess shallow and skeletal soils, at times chemically degraded, extremes of
slopes, severely eroded and lands subjected to excessive aridity with scrubs dominating the
landscape. They have a tendency for intermixing with cropped areas.
Open Scrub
This category has a similar description as mentioned in the earlier class excepting that they
possess sparse vegetation or devoid of scrub and have a thin soil cover.
Barren/Rocky/Stony Waste
These are rock exposures of varying lithology often barren and devoid of soil and
vegetation cover. They occur amidst hill-forests as openings or as isolated exposures on
plateau and plains. Such lands can be easily discriminated from other categories of
wastelands because of their characteristic spectral response. They appear in greenish blue
to yellow to brownish in color depending on the rock type. They vary in size with irregular
to discontinuous shape with a linear to contiguous or dispersed pattern. They are located in
steep isolated hillocks/hill slopes, crests, plateau and eroded plains associated with barren
and exposed rocky/stony wastes, lateritic outcrops, mining and quarrying sites.
Water Bodies
This category comprises areas with surface water, either impounded in the form of ponds,
lakes and reservoirs or flowing as streams, rivers, canals etc. These are seen clearly on the
satellite image in blue to dark blue or cyan color depending on the depth of water.
River /Stream/Canal
Rivers/streams are natural course of water flowing on the land surface along a definite
channel/slope regularly or intermittently towards a sea in most cases or a lake or an inland
basin in desert areas or a marsh or another river. Depending upon the nature of availability
of water, rivers are sub-divided into perennial or seasonal. They appear in light to dark
blue in color, long, narrow to wide depending on the size of the river. They appear in
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 58
contiguous, at times non linear pattern and associated with drainage pattern on hill slopes,
flood plains or uplands, at times with vegetation along the banks.
Lakes / Ponds
These are accumulation of water in a depression of various sizes either natural or saline
Lakes / ponds are those that retain water in them either for one season or throughout the
year and usually not subject to extreme fluctuation in water level. Ponds are body of water
limited in size, either natural or artificial, regular in shape, smaller in size than a lake,
generally located near settlements.
Reservoir / Tanks
Reservoir is an artificial lake created by construction of a dam across the river specifically
for irrigation, and water supply for domestic/industrial needs, flood control, etc., either
singly or in combination. Tanks are small lakes of impounded water ways constructed on
land surface for irrigation. They appear in light blue to dark blue depending on the depth
from small to large sizes. They possess regular to irregular shape dispersed to linear,
occupying lowlands, plains. They are associated with croplands, low lands and reservoirs
surrounded by hills with or without vegetation.
Drainage
In geomorphology, a drainage system is the pattern formed by the streams, rivers, and
lakes in a particular drainage basin. They are governed by the topography of the land,
whether a particular region is dominated by hard or soft rocks, and the gradient of the land.
Geomorphologists and hydrologists often view streams as being part of drainage basins. A
drainage basin is the topographic region from which a stream receives runoff, through
flow, and groundwater flow. Drainage basins are divided from each other by topographic
barriers called a watershed. A watershed represents all of the stream tributaries that flow
to some location along the stream channel. The number, size, and shape of the drainage
basins found in an area varies and the larger the topographic map.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 59
CHAPTER- 2
Irrigation is the artificial application of water to the land or soil. It is used to assist in the growing
of agricultural crops, maintenance of landscapes, and revegetation of disturbed soils in dry areas
and during periods of inadequate rainfall. There is a great necessity of irrigation in Indian
agriculture. India has a great diversity and variety of climate and weather conditions. These
conditions range from extreme of heat to extreme of cold and from extreme dryness to excessive
rainfall. Due to some reasons irrigation is needed in Indian agriculture.
Uncertainty of Monsoon rainfall both in time and place.
Irregularity in distribution of rainfall throughout the year.
Excessive rainfall causing flood.
Draught is an annual event in some areas.
India is a land of Rabi Crops. But there is not rainfall in winter months.
Some soils need more water.
Introduction of H.Y.V seeds and multiple cropping need water throughout the
year.
The types of Irrigation mainly practiced in India are:
Tanks
(a) Sichhni (b) Donga
Well
(a) Dug Well (b) Tube Well: (i) Shallow. (ii) Deep.
Canal
(a) Perennial (b) Non-Perennial
2.1. Crop water Requirement
Crop water requirement is the water required by the plants for its survival, growth, development
and to produce economic parts. This requirement is applied either naturally by precipitation or
artificially by irrigation. Hence the crop water requirement includes all losses like:
a) Transpiration loss through leaves (T)
b) Evaporation loss through soil surface in cropped area (E)
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 60
c) Amount of weather used by plants (WP) for its metabolic activities which is estimated as less
than 1% of the total water absorption. These three components cannot be separated so easily.
Hence the ET loss is taken as crop water use or crop water consumptive use.
d) Other application losses are conveyance loss, percolation loss, runoff loss, etc., (WL).
e) The water required for special purposes (WSP) like puddling operation, ploughing operation,
land preparation, leaching, requirement, for the purpose of weeding, for dissolving fertilizer and
chemical, etc. Hence the water requirement is symbolically represented as:
WR = T + E + WP + WL + WSP
(The other application losses and special purposes are mostly indented for wet land cultivation.
Hence for irrigated dry land crop the ET loss alone is accounted for crop water requirement). The
estimations of the water requirement of crop are one of the basic needs for crop planning on the
farm and for the planning of any irrigation project.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 61
Name Of the District- seraikela
Area sown (ha)
Kharif
Area sown (ha) Rabi
Irrigated area (ha)
Crop water
demand (mm)
Water potential required
(BCM)
Existing Water potential
(BCM)
Water potential to be created
(BCM) Crop
Crop water
demand (kharif)(BCM)
Crop water demand
(Rabi)(BCM)
Total water
demand (BCM)
Irrigated Rainfed Total
a. Cereals 10700 10600 0.02332 100 0.001 1100 0.02432 0.03648 0.007296 0.029184
b. Coarse Cereals
780 585 0.000468 280 0.00112
400
0.001588 0.002382 0.0004764 0.0019056
C. Pulses 154 154 0.000139 0 450 0.000139 0.0002079 0.00004158 0.00016632
D. Oil seeds 200 0 200 0.0007 350
0.0007 0.00105 0.00021 0.00084
Mango 21 0.0000126 0 300 1.26E-05 0.0000189 0.00000378 0.00001512
Guava 16 0.0000096 0 300 9.6E-06 0.0000144 0.00000288 0.00001152
Lemon 8 0.0000048 0 300 4.8E-06 0.0000072 0.00000144 0.00000576
Banana 5 0.000006 0 600 0.000006 0.000009 0.0000018 0.0000072
Brinjal 0 52 0.000312 600 0.000312 0.000468 0.0000936 0.0003744
Cabbage 0 0 146 0.000876 600 0.000876 0.001314 0.0002628 0.0010512
Cauliflower 0 125 0.00075 600 0.00075 0.001125 0.000225 0.0009
Cucumber 0 21 0.000126 600 0.000126 0.000189 0.0000378 0.0001512
Okra 0 42 0.000252 600 0.000252 0.000378 0.0000756 0.0003024
Potato 0 63 0.000378 600 0.000378 0.000567 0.0001134 0.0004536
Tomato 0 125 0.000438 350 0.000438 0.00065625 0.00013125 0.000525
Peas 0 63 0.000221 350 0.000221 0.00033075 0.00006615 0.0002646
Other Veg. 0 219 0.000767 350 0.000767 0.00114975 0.00022995 0.0009198
0.030898 0.04634715 0.00926943 0.03707772
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 62
Table – 27
Year January February March April May June July August September October November December Annual Total
2004 0 0 5.7 155.2 27.5 145.9 137.4 189.9 52.1 72 0 0 785.7
2005 24 0 19.5 0 0 41.1 0 0 0 101 0 18 203.6
2006 0 0 31.8 14 0 0 0 325.8 33.3 0 0 0 404.9
2007 0 35 0 8 68 113 0 306.4 306.8 3.4 2 0 842.6
2008 0 1.3 1.2 15.2 31.4 44.4 148 130 159.7 0 0 0 531.2
2009 0 0 0 0 0 148.8 121.2 545.8 285.4 382.7 0 0 1483.9
2010 0 2.2 3 36.4 0 56.3 100 180 172.6 55.6 0 42 648.1
2011 28.4 88.5 133.3 175.5 37.5 463.2
2012 357 237.9 307.4 902.3
2013 31 -116.9 336.3 269.6 224.5 8.5 13.3 24.2 790.5
2014 0 143.6 179.4 280.1 261.4 251.1 0 1115.6
2015 0 8.2 16.1 0 46.5 165.6 321.3 291.9 105.6 66.2 0 0 1021.4
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 63
Graph- 12
Table-28 Types of holdings
Individual
Holdings Joint Holdings
Sub-
Total(Individual+Joint)
Institutional
Holdings Total Holdings
Sl.No. Size of
Holding(in
ha.)
Number Area Number Area Number Area Number Area Number Area
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
1 Below 0.5 68482 20274 4295 1799 72777 22072 0 0 72777 22072
2 0.5-1.0 17797 13634 1539 1274 19336 14907 111 105 19447 15012
3 1.0-2.0 16884 23970 8421 15298 25305 39269 155 298 25460 39567
4 2.0-3.0 5882 15147 4004 9939 9886 25086 280 753 10166 25838
5 3.0-4.0 893 3074 715 2662 1608 5736 0 0 1608 5736
6 4.0-5.0 3932 19077 2277 10821 6209 29898 210 948 6419 30846
7 5.0-7.5 634 4184 560 3895 1194 8078 0 0 1194 8078
8 7.5-10.0 130 1069 330 2953 460 4022 0 0 460 4022
9 10.0-20.0 145 1721 434 6709 579 8430 1 10 580 8440
10 20.0 &
ABOVE 3 64 12 559 15 623 0 0 15 623
11 ALL
CLASSES 114782 102213 22587 55909 137369 158122 757 2114 138126 160236
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 64
Table-29 Average land holding
Sl.No.
Size of
holding(in ha.)
Individual
Holdings Joint Holdings
Sub-
Total(Individual+Joint)
Institutional
Holdings Total Holdings
Number Area Number Area Number Area Number Area Number Area
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
1 MARGINAL 86279 33908 5834 3073 92113 36981 111 105 92224 37084
2 SMALL 16884 23970 8421 15298 25305 39268 155 298 25460 39567
3 SEMIMEDIUM 6775 18221 4719 12601 11494 30822 280 753 11774 31574
4 MEDIUM 4696 24330 3167 17669 7863 41999 210 948 8073 42946
5 LARGE 148 1785 446 7268 594 9053 1 10 595 9063
6 ALL CLASSES 114782 102213 22587 55909 137369 158122 757 2114 138126 160236
Table-30- Source wise irrigation
Sl.No Size Class(HA) Area
Irrigated-
Canal
Area
Irrigated
Tanks
Area
Irrigated
wells
Area
Irrigated
Tibe
wells
Area
Irrigated-
Others
1 Below 0.5 13 17 1 342 1
2 0.5 - 1.0 6 43 2 297 Neg
MARGINAL 18 60 3 639 1
3 1.0 - 2.0 0 11 3 136 102
SMALL 0 11 3 136 102
4 2.0 - 3.0 0 32 0 50 0
5 3.0 - 4.0 0 23 0 44 0
SEMIMEDIUM 0 56 0 93 0
6 4.0 - 5.0 0 67 6 21 0
7 5.0 - 7.5 0 27 Neg 10 0
8 7.5 - 10.0 0 44 10 0 0
MEDIUM 0 138 15 31 0
9 10.0 - 20.0 0 2 Neg Neg 0
10 20.0 & ABOVE 0 0 0 0 0
LARGE 0 2 Neg Neg 0
11 ALL CLASSES 18 267 22 900 103
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 65
Graph-14
Net
Area Current
Net
Cultivated Uncultivated Land
Fallow
Land
Culturable
Waste
Total
Uncultivated
Land Not
Available
Size Class(HA) Sown Fallows Area Excluding Fallow
Land
Land Land for Cultivation
Below 0.5 8330 11654 19984 173 1391 40 1604 485
0.5 - 1.0 3866 9811 13677 211 627 71 908 427
MARGINAL 12195 21465 33660 383 2018 111 2512 912
1.0 - 2.0 11168 22664 33832 620 3654 445 4718 1016
SMALL 11168 22664 33832 620 3654 445 4718 1016
2.0 - 3.0 6888 12995 19883 463 4275 262 5000 955
3.0 - 4.0 1453 3278 4731 139 498 95 732 273
SEMIMEDIUM 8341 16273 24614 602 4773 357 5732 1228
4.0 - 5.0 9454 13402 22857 309 4098 189 4595 3394
5.0 - 7.5 2323 4773 7096 118 523 89 731 252
7.5 - 10.0 1360 2058 3418 62 298 58 418 187
MEDIUM 13137 20233 33371 489 4919 336 5744 3832
10.0 - 20.0 3723 2108 5831 530 1027 463 2020 589
20.0 & ABOVE 278 128 407 38 77 57 173 43
LARGE 4001 2237 6238 568 1104 520 2193 633
ALL CLASSES 48843 82873 131716 2662 16468 1768 20898 7622
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 66
Productivity in Kg per Ha
Productivity
Crop Unirrigated Irrigated
Paddy 2066
Maize 1300 1040
Wheat 1347
Pigeon pea 172
Mustard 360
Potato 9695
Ladies finger 14000
Tomato 20000
Brinjal 20000
Cauliflower 12000
Mango 16000
Banana 20000
Lemon 10000
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 67
Chapter - 3 Water Availability 3.1. Status of Water Availability
Estimation of Ground Water Resources has been carried out based on the methodology
recommended by the Groundwater Estimation Committee (GEC’97). A ground water
resource of the entire state has been computed by CGWB (CGWB, NCCR, 2011) for the year
2008-2009. Salient features of the estimation of ground water resources are described
below. The present computations pertain to the ground water year 2008-09. The resources
have been computed block wise. Areas having slope more than 20 % were excluded from
recharge computations. Ground water recharge and draft were computed separately for
command and non-command areas. The present Ground Water Development in the district
has been calculated for command area and non-command area separately for each block.
All the blocks in the study area have been categorized as safe from ground water
abstraction point of view.
The overall ground water development in the district is moderate.
Ground water availability: Table-33
DYNAMIC GROUND WATER RESOURCES (2009)
Net annual ground water availability (BCM) 0.1886
Gross Ground Water Draft for all uses (BCM) 0.02209
Projected Demand for Domestic and Industrial uses up to 0.01730
next 25 years (BCM)
Stage of Ground Water Development 11.71 %
Surface water is water on the surface of the planet such as in a stream, river, lake, wetland,
or pond/tank. It can be contrasted with groundwater and atmospheric water. Nonsaline
surface water is replenished by precipitation and by recruitment from ground-water. It is
lost through evaporation, seepage into the ground where it becomes ground-water, used by
plants for transpiration, extracted by mankind for agriculture, living, industry etc. or
discharged to the sea where it becomes saline.
To derive Surface Water volume basically, we measure volumes and surface areas of a set
of farm ponds and tanks, and then develop relationships between surface areas and
volumes. After that using these relationships calculated volumes of the whole study region
surface water bodies based on our remote-sensing surface area.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 68
Status of command:
Table-34
Block Total CCA
Pot Created Balance 3 year programme
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Beyond 17-18
Seraikela 12831.78 829 12002.78 360 840 600 10202.78
Gamharia 3332 2305 1027 340 340 347 0
Rajnagar 21960 899 21061 750 1790 1320 17201
Kharsawan 10137 825 9312 700 1100 1340 6172
Kuchai 14071.94 702 13369.94 580 1380 720 10689.94
Chandil 10739.54 733 10006.54 380 560 500 8566.54
Nimdih 14927 582 14345 580 760 620 12385
Ichagarh 13785.22 2034 11751.22 380 460 400 10511.22
Kukru 11000 216 10784 710 1130 960 7984
112784.5 9125 103659.5 4780 8360 6807 83712.48
Table for stored surface water
Table- 35
Block Area in Ha
Adityapur 1788.33
Chandil 1806.13
Gobindpur 750.51
Ichagarh 2762.43
Kharsawan 433.22
Kukru 1260.76
Kuchai 171.83
Nimdih 1673.25
Seraikela 852.41
Total 11498.86
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 69
Graph -15
Table- 36 Calculation of water stored
Block Area in Ha
Water stored
Adityapur 1788.33 52040322.12
Chandil 1806.13 52558424.33
Gobindpur 750.51 21839728.32
Ichagarh 2762.43 80386841.7
Kharsawan 433.22 12606616.52
Kukru 1260.76 36688213.79
Kuchai 171.83 5000298.604
Nimdih 1673.25 48691440.01
Seraikela 852.41 24805011.2
Total 11498.86 334616896.6
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 70
Chapter – 4
Water Requirement /Demand:
4.1. Domestic Water Demand
The quantity of water delivered and used for households is an important aspect of
domestic water supplies, which influences hygiene and therefore public health. To date,
WHO has not provided guidance on the quantity of domestic water that is required to
promote good health. This paper reviews the requirements for water for health-related
purposes to derive a figure of an acceptable minimum to meet the needs for consumption
(hydration and food preparation) and basic hygiene.
Based on estimates of requirements of lactating women who engage in moderate physical
activity in above-average temperatures, a minimum of 7.5 litres per capita per day will
meet the requirements of most people under most conditions. This water needs to be of a
quality that represents a tolerable level of risk. This volume does not account for health
and well-being-related demands outside normal domestic use such as water use in health
care facilities, food production, economic activity or amenity use.
The basic need for water includes water used for personal hygiene, but defining a minimum
has limited significance as the volume of water used by households depends on
accessibility as determined primarily by distance and time, but also including reliability
and potentially cost. Accessibility can be categorised in terms of service level. A summary
of the degree to which different levels of service will meet requirements to sustain good
health and interventions required to ensure health gains are maximised.
According to Froukh the term ‘domestic water demand’ is the amount of water required for
domestic uses. Water demand forecasting is essential to water utilities, both for day-to-day
operations and for long-term planning. A number of factors like climate, culture, food
habits, work and working conditions, level and type of development, and physiology
determine the requirement of water. As per the Bureau of Indian Standards, a minimum
water supply of 200 litres per capita per day (lpcd) should be provided for domestic
consumption in cities with full flushing systems. It also mentions that the amount of water
supply may be reduced to 135 lpcd for the LIG and the economically weaker sections
(EWS) of the society and in small towns. For making it comfortable we have taken the
water demand at 80 liters/day for rural areas and 135 liters/day for urban areas.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 71
Table- 37
Block wise Domestic water demand
2011 2015 2020 Existing Gap
Kuchai 0.0019 0.0019 0.0019 0.0015 0.0004
Kharsawan 0.0070 0.0070 0.0071 0.0056 0.0015
Chandil 0.0056 0.0056 0.0057 0.0045 0.0012
Ichagarh 0.0024 0.0025 0.0025 0.0020 0.0005
Kukru 0.0015 0.0016 0.0016 0.0013 0.0003
Adityapur(Gamharia) 0.0128 0.0130 0.0132 0.0104 0.0028
Saraikela 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0026 0.0007
Gobindpur(Rajnagar) 0.0040 0.0040 0.0041 0.0032 0.0009
Nimdih 0.0023 0.0023 0.0024 0.0019 0.0005
Total 0.0407 0.0412 0.0417 0.0329 0.0087
Graph -16
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 72
Graph -17
4.2. Crop water Demand:
It is essential to know the water requirement of a crop which is the total quantity of water
required from its sowing time up to harvest. Naturally different crops may have different
water requirements at different places of the same country, depending upon the climate,
type of soil, method of cultivation, effective rain etc. The total water required for crop
growth is not uniformly distributed over its entire life span which is also called crop period.
Actually, the watering stops same time before harvest and the time duration from the first
irrigation during sowing up to the last before harvest is called base period. Though crop
period is slightly more than the base period, they do not differ from practical purposes.
Table- 38
Total water
demand (BCM)
Water potential required
(BCM)
Existing Water
potential (BCM)
Water potential
to be created (BCM)
Kuchai 0.033516 0.050274 0.010055 0.040219
Kharsawan 0.032796 0.049195 0.009839 0.039356
Chandil 0.046798 0.070197 0.014039 0.056157
Ichagarh 0.042774 0.064161 0.012832 0.051328
Kukru 0.028607 0.042911 0.008582 0.034329
Adityapur(Gamharia) 0.050146 0.075219 0.015044 0.060175
Saraikela 0.030898 0.046347 0.009269 0.037078
Gobindpur(Rajnagar) 0.04892 0.07338 0.014676 0.058704
Nimdih 0.041141 0.061711 0.012342 0.049369
Total 0.3556 0.53339 0.10668 0.42671
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 73
4.3. Livestock water Demand:
Global trend in animal production indicates a rapid and massive increase in the
consumption of livestock products. It is predicted that meat and milk consumption will
grow at 2.8 and 3.3% per annum, respectively, in developing countries like India where the
whole system of rural economy has revolved around livestock production. Providing
enough quality water is essential for good livestock husbandry. Water makes up 80% of the
blood, regulates body temperature and is vital for organ functions such as digestion, waste
removal and the absorption of nutrients. Understanding daily livestock watering needs is
key when designing a livestock watering system.
The daily water requirement of livestock varies significantly among animal species. The
animal's size and growth stage will have a strong influence on daily water intake.
Consumption rates can be affected by environmental and management factors. Air
temperature, relative humidity and the level of animal exertion or production level are
examples of these factors. The quality of the water, which includes temperature, salinity
and impurities affecting taste and odour, will also have an effect. The water content of the
animal's diet will influence its drinking habits. Feed with a relatively high moisture content
decreases the quantity of drinking water required.
Given that drinking water needs are species-, farm- and management-specific, many
producers today are opting to install water-metering equipment to obtain accurate
measurements of water use. If medication is ever provided through the livestock's watering
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 74
system, the meter can be used to ensure proper dose rates.
Table 4.3 gives block water demand for livestock for current year .Estimation is done based
on livestock water demand which is different for types of animals. There is no additional
water requirement as stored water is more than water requirement. 25% of water is
reserved for this purpose in all current and future structures.
Total water
demand (BCM)
Water potential required
(BCM)
Existing Water
potential (BCM)
Water potential
to be created (BCM)
Kuchai 0.000314 0.000392 0.000251 0.000141
Kharsawan 0.000302 0.000378 0.000242 0.000136
Chandil 0.000330 0.000413 0.000264 0.000149
Ichagarh 0.000324 0.000405 0.000259 0.000146
Kukru 0.000327 0.000409 0.000262 0.000147
Adityapur(Gamharia) 0.000340 0.000425 0.000272 0.000153
Saraikela 0.000315 0.000394 0.000252 0.000142
Gobindpur(Rajnagar) 0.000314 0.000393 0.000251 0.000141
Nimdih 0.000315 0.000394 0.000252 0.000142
Total 0.002883 0.003603 0.002306 0.001297
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 75
4.4. Industrial Water Demand
In Jharkhand, industry is the second highest consumer of water. The main sources of water
for the industrial sector are groundwater and surface water. Groundwater has emerged as
an important source to meet the water requirements of industries. Choice of source of
water depends on the availability of sufficient and regular supply of water and the cost of
water from the source. While the running cost of surface water is mainly the price paid to
the supplier—the municipal bodies; the cost of groundwater is the extraction cost—energy
used (electricity/diesel). Since the prices of all the inputs, water, electricity, and diesel are
administered or regulated by the government, the inefficient use of water remains a normal
practice. Since the surface water supply from municipal sources is not sufficiently
guaranteed, industrial units tend to depend on groundwater.
Net water demand for industries in the current year is 1.272 BCM. Industrial water demand
for the year 2020 is estimated at 1.59 BCM. Data is obtained from CGWB and district
industries department.
Number Capacity 2015 2020 Existing Gap
Small 20 4.8 0.096 0.12 0.0912 0.0288
Medium 75 2.4 0.18 0.225 0.171 0.054
Large 830 1.2 0.996 1.245 0.9462 0.2988
Total 1.272 1.59 1.2084 0.3816
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 76
4.5. Water demand for Power generation:
There is six power plant hence no water demand is there for power generation
Number Capacity Requirement 2015 2020 Existing Gap
Power generation 6 36 216 0.216 0.27 0.2052 0.0648
Combined water demand block wise:
Total water
demand (BCM)
Water potential required
(BCM)
Existing Water
potential (BCM)
Water potential
to be created (BCM)
Kuchai 0.03573 0.052566 0.011806 0.04076
Kharsawan 0.040098 0.056673 0.015681 0.040992
Chandil 0.052728 0.07631 0.018803 0.057506
Ichagarh 0.541598 0.687066 0.486291 0.200774
Kukru 0.030534 0.04492 0.010144 0.034776
Adityapur(Gamharia) 0.559486 0.708844 0.496916 0.211928
Saraikela 0.530413 0.669941 0.483321 0.18672
Gobindpur(Rajnagar) 0.053234 0.077873 0.018127 0.059745
Nimdih 0.043756 0.064505 0.014494 0.050011
Total 1.887577 2.438698 1.555583 0.883212
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 77
4.6. Water Demand of the district for Various sectors (Present)
Based on calculation it is reflect that total current water requirement is 1.88 BCM. Highest
water requirement is in Adityapur block and lowest requirement is in Kukru Block. Due to
rapid urbanisation and increasing population in 2020 water requirement is near about
2.44 BCM.
Total water
demand (BCM)
Water potential required
(BCM)
Existing Water
potential (BCM)
Water potential
to be created (BCM)
Domestic water demand 0.0412 0.0417 0.0329 0.0087
Crop water demand 0.3556 0.53339 0.10668 0.42671
Livestock water demand 0.002883 0.003603 0.002306 0.001297
Industrial water demand 1.272 1.59 1.2084 0.3816
Water demand for power 0.216 0.27 0.2052 0.0648
Total water demand 1.887683 2.438693 1.555486 0.883107
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 78
Chapter -5 Strategic Action plan
Water is essential for sustaining life and at the same time, it is an important component for
almost all developmental plans. Obviously the schemes for development of water resources
for beneficial use of the society have been taken up since the time immemorial.
Considerable progress has been made in respect of water resources development in India
after independence through various Plans and such developments have helped in almost
five fold increase in creation of irrigation potential. Total created irrigation potential at pre-
Plan period was about 22.6 million hectares (Mha) which at present is about 108.2 Mha.
There has also been appreciable development in the areas of drinking water supply and
other uses. However, growing population, urbanization and industrialization has led to
considerable increase in demand of water for various purposes e.g., irrigation, domestic
needs, industrial requirements etc.
In this regard, it may be mentioned that the water sector has very strong linkages with all
other developmental activities. In view of fast changing development scenario, it is
emphasized that the key priorities and identified strategies cannot be considered as static
and firm. These need to be reviewed and improved upon from time to time. In this regard a
comprehensive “Strategic Plan for District Irrigation” has been prepared through
geospatial approach:
5.1. Methodology
Diverse research methodologies using RS and GIS have been applied by different authors to
identify potential rainwater harvestings in remote and data scarce areas; in most of these
methods, thematic maps are derived from remote sensing data and integrated in GIS to
evaluate suitable sites for rainwater harvesting. Remote sensing is of immense use for
natural resources mapping and generating necessary spatial database required as an input
for GIS analysis. GIS is a tool for collecting, storing and analyzing spatial and non - spatial
data, and developing a model based on local factors can be used to evaluate appropriate
natural resources development and management action plans. Both these techniques can
complement each other to be used as an effective tool for selecting suitable sites for water
harvesting structures.
In assessment of proposed rainwater harvesting structures potential using GIS and RS,
outlines six key factors that require to be integrated into a GIS framework in order to
successfully develop a suitable model for RWH. This include; rainfall, hydrology (rainfall
runoff relationships), slope, land cover, soils (texture, structure, depth) and socio-
economics of the area under consideration.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 79
The following criteria have been followed for making decision on selecting suitable site for
various water harvesting structures as per Integrated Mission for Sustainable Development
(IMSD) guidelines.
Check dams
The slope should be less than 15 per cent.
The land use may be barren, shrub land and riverbed.
The infiltration rate of the soil should be less.
The type of soil should be sandy clay loam.
Percolation tanks and nala bunds
The slope should be less than 10 per cent.
The infiltration rate of the soil should be moderately high.
The land use / cover may be barren or scrub land.
The type of soil should be silt loam.
The suitability of WHS sites can be confirmed as the site is located on second and third
order drainage and satisfies the conditions of land use, soil type and slope as per IMSD
guidelines. Water harvesting structures are extremely important to conserve precious
natural resources like, soil and water, which is depleting day by day at alarming rate. The
following table provide strategic action plan for irrigation for each block as well as for
whole district and estimated costs and period of implementation.
5.2. Prioritization of Blocks and activity for Strategic Planning
The prioritization is the heart of the programme in which any programme will be
implemented. Some of the important activities to be included in first phase or first year and
some of the activity included in last year or last phase. For prioritization of the activity and
block fallowing criteria has been adopeted.
1. Map the present situation.
2. Talk to local peoples and public representatives.
3. Availability of Resources.
4. Poverty Index.
5. Percentage of SC & ST Population.
6. Percentage of Formers .
7. Cropping Intensity.
8. Ground Water Situation.
9. Available of Degraded Land.
10. Land Capability Status.
11. Percentage of Irrigated area to total cropped area.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 80
YEAR BATC
H BLOCK(s)
GEOGRAPHIC
AL AREA (in
Ha)
TREATAB
LE AREA
(in Ha)
PROJEC
T COST
(Rs. in
Lakh)
NO. OF
MICRO-
WATERSHE
DS
1 2009-
10 I Rajnagar 3753.3600 5042.7000
605.124
0 10
2 2011-
12 III(A)
Ichagarh, Chandil
6133.4418 5246.2487 629.549
8 5
3 2011-
12 III(A) Ichagarh 7089.0023 6360.3931
763.247
2 7
4 2011-
12 III(B) Gobindpur 6074.5679 5458.4368
655.012
4 7
5 2013-
14 V Kharsawan 6174.7621 5797.3684
869.605
3 4
29225.13 27905.15
3522.538
7 33
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 81
Chapter - 6
Expected Outcomes
Outcomes expected: - The implementation of different interventions as proposed in the
DPR will result in positive changes in life of people of the proposed district. These changes
can be summarized in the following broad headings-
Status of ground water table- Due to the various soil and moisture conservation activities
carried in the different villages of the district, percolation of water will be increased
resulting in the increase of ground water table. It will be further augmented by different
water storage structures and green cover generated from the plantation being done in the
village. Harvesting runoff water for irrigation will also lead to enhanced percolation and
increased ground water table. The increase in ground water table can be seen from the 3rd
year of the intervention.
Ground water structures: It has also come out that ponds have limited use for irrigation.
Lift irrigation systems are becoming costly due to the increasing prices of fossil fuels.
Economics is not setting correctly for the lift irrigation systems. But since PMKSY do not
have any such restrictions, well thought of structures have been put under the proposed
plan. It has been kept in mind that there is a need for conjunctive utilization of surface and
ground water for better sustainability of the water as resource.
Quality of drinking water: Drinking water is a function of ground water availability. In
most of the discussion it has come out that during peak of summers, availability of drinking
water is an issue. The current plan will help in increasing groundwater table and thus
availability of drinking water during the peak summers. In absence of drinking water
availability people drink water which is not suitable and safe for drinking. The project will
help in increasing access to safe drinking water from the 3rd year as a result of different soil
and moisture conservation activities along with the water storage and harvesting
structures.
Due to convergence of the different programmes existing structures will be repaired and it
will help in increasing availability of drinking water across all blocks of the district. Also it
has been proposed that wells will be constructed resulting in increased availability of
water for people of the district.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 82
Availability of drinking water: As said above availability of drinking water during the
peak summers is always an issue. The pre project studies suggest that water is available for
almost 8-9 months in general. Post project availability will be increased to 12 months for
all the families living in the villages under the watershed.
Increase in irrigation potential: Water for irrigation is essential for success of watershed
and livelihood interventions proposed for any watershed. This is mainly because almost 70
to 80 percent of the rural population depends on agriculture for its survival. In the district
people generally opt for the open wells as main source of irrigation, where as ponds came
as the second choice. Construction of check dams and provision of lift irrigation systems
are also proposed as means of irrigation. Along with it construction of irrigation channels
from the check dams and ponds are also proposed to enhance the area under assured
irrigation. According to people 60% of total geographical area should be brought under
assured irrigation for ensuring food security and reducing migration.
Change in the cropping pattern: Since irrigation remains one of the most critical factors
for crop diversification and intensification, with the plan being progressed across district
and increase in the irrigated area, there is going to be a shift in the cropping patter. At least
30000 Ha of land will be brought under irrigation through the PMKSY. Since the plan
focuses on use of mostly run off in the district, limited land will be brought under direct
irrigation but it will lead to increased availability of water to the community in the long
run.
Increase in crop production area: Crop production area will increase due to the
additional land brought under irrigation and cultivation both. Almost 30000 Ha will be
brought under 2nd cropping and 15000 Ha will be brought under 3rd cropping by PMKSY
programme in the district.
Increase in area under vegetation: 512 Ha of unutilized land will be brought under
vegetation. The vegetation will be comprised of Timber, fodder and fruit plantations. This
will help in water regulation and water cycling at the local level. This along with the other
measures will help in maintaining the hydrological cycle at the district level, it will also
help in reducing pressure on forest due to fuel wood and fodder for animals.
Increase in Horticulture crop:145 Ha of unutilized land will be brought under fruit
plants. Plants of Mango, Guava, Lemon and Papaya will be planted. Choice of the species
will be according to the farmers. Since the crops are of different duration intercropping of
the oil seeds will be promoted as under cover. These inter cropping will be helpful in
improving soil texture and also in fixing atmospheric nitrogen in the soil.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 83
Increase in fuel crops: Species like Arjuna, Gamhar, Sissoo, Sagwan and Karanj will be
planted. 367 Ha of land will be brought under timber plantation which will also help in
getting fuel wood through pruning of the plants. These plants will yield high quality timber
on maturity part from increasing green cover during the rotation period. Species of
Susabool and Glyrecidia will be planted to support fodder and green manuring crops on the
plantations. These will also be taken for agro forestry programme under the project.
Increase in fodder crops: Fodder crops like Maize which has multiple uses will be
promoted under the project. 10 Ha of land will be brought under the fodder crop for
supporting animal husbandry based activities.
Increase in milk production: Milk production in the area will be enhanced through the
improved Breed, feed, diseases and housing management practices. Support will be taken
from BAIF for establishing AI center and from Dairy development department for induction
of the cross breed animals. Through feed and breed management milk yield from the
existing indigenous milch animals will be also be increased. From the current level of 1.5
liter/animal/day it will be increased to 1.9 liter/animal/day at the end of the project.
No of SHGs promoted: 600 more number of women SHGs will be promoted and through
these SHGs at least 6600 families will be accessed directly for the livelihood interventions
through theNRLM scheme or through direct bank linkage.
Increase in Number of livelihoods: Due to different community based organizations like
SHGs, farmer’s club and user groups promoted under the project variety of options for the
livelihood will be generated. Activities like Dairy, Goatry, Poultry, Piggery and vocational
training based service activities like paravets will take shape. Programme plans to access
30% of the total families living in the project area through the livelihood activities.
Resource use agreement: for all the 30913 water storage structures, common property
resources developed under the programme there will write norms of garment with the
watershed committee for use. There will be written benefit sharing mechanism between
the watershed committee and watershed community under the programme.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 84
1 2 3 4 5 6
S.
No. Item
Unit of
measurement
Pre-project
Status
Expected
Post-project
Status
Remarks
1 Status of water table
(Depth to Ground water
level)
Meters 12 11 Rise in water
table
2 Ground water structures
repaired/ rejuvenated
No. 00 2118 All wells will
have enhanced
water table
3 Quality of drinking water Description Good Better Improved
quality of
water
4 Availability of drinking
water
Description 10 months 12 months Round the year
availability of
water
5 Increase in irrigation
potential
Hec. 22325 52325 30000
additional area
brought under
irrigation
6 Change in cropping/ land
use pattern
Description More intensive
Kahriff and
Rabi crops
7 Area under agricultural
crop
Ha 91400 99400 Increased due
to SMC works
I Area under single
crop
Ha 91400 99400 Due to SMC
works
II Area under double
crop
Ha 22325 52325 Due to water
storage
structures
III Area under multiple
crop
Ha 11000 26000 Due to
enhanced
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 85
irrigation
potential
8 Net increase in crop
production area
Ha 91400 99400 Increased due
to SMC works
9 Increase in area under
Vegetation/Forest
Ha 00 512 Under IWMP
and
MGNREGA
10 Increase in area under
horticulture
Ha 00 145 Under IWMP
11 Increase in area under fuel Ha 00 367 Under
MGNREGA
12 Increase in area under
Fodder
Ha 00 10 As
undergrowth in
plantations
13 Increase in milk
production
Litres/day 1.50 1.95
14 Environmental Impact
Change in Soil Loss
Perenniality of flow and
change in Run-off
Recharge of ground water
Less soil
erosion, more
perennial water
sources, water
table raised
14 No. of SHGs Promoted No. 1200 1800 600 more SHG
promoted
15 Increase in no. of
livelihoods
No. 13200 19800 6600 more
women will
have access to
livelihoods
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 86
Chapter- 7
Water Audit Water audit for the PMKSY at Seraikela
The main aim of the Seraikela Water Resources Audit (WRA) is to assess the status of water
resources in the district and to provide a framework for more productive, sustainable
and/or equitable use of water resources. A major feature of the WRA is the consolidation,
ground truthing and analysis of water-related information using a GIS database. This
involved collecting data from a wide range of different sources and carrying out field
surveys to update and validate spatial and non-spatial data.
Land Use
The main land use across ditrcit is rainfed arable cropping. On the red soils, a single crop is
grown each year and around 80% of the rainfed arable area is under Paddy. On the shallow
and medium-depth black soils, rainfed double-cropping is possible and Maize is most
common crop.F
Analysis of the net revenues of the main rainfed and irrigated crops shows that, in most
cases, the relative percentage area under different crops is consistent with the relative net
revenue. Anomalies occur in the case of crops that are grown for subsistence purposes (e.g.
jowar, ragi, bajra, seteria) or crops that have high risks associated with them (e.g. onion).
As might be expected, in the case of irrigated crops, comparisons of net revenues per unit
area and net revenues per unit volume of water show that farmers are currently more
interested in maximising profit per unit of land. Analysis of data from on-farm trials shows
that substantial improvements in net revenue per unit area (for irrigated and rainfed
crops) and per unit volume of water are possible if a range of improved practices is
adopted by farmers.
Objective of the water audit:
To assess the status of water and other natural resources at scales ranging from the
micro-watershed to the macro-watershed, thereby, to inform decision-making and
policy formulation at all levels irrigation based programme.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 87
To assess pressures on groundwater and surface water resources and current
trends in use and demand (e.g. water demands for domestic purposes, irrigation,
non-land based activities).
To assess the relative value of different water uses in terms of productivity, equity
and basic human and environmental needs.
Based on the above, to identify resource management practices and policies that are
economically viable and that have the potential to bring about more equitable,
sustainable and productive use of water in the long term.
To provide baseline data against which some resource-related indicators can be
monitored.
To build capacity of officials so that they have the skills and confidence to undertake
and update resource audits.
Why carry out a water audit?
Because a water audit can:
· Identify the current status of water resources at different scales and trends in
demand and use;
· Provide information on access and entitlements to water and the trade-offs that
have resulted or will result from different patterns of water use;
· Provide information on social and institutional factors affecting access to water and
reliability of water supplies;
· Help identify externalities which only become apparent when the patterns of water
use are considered at the macro temporal and spatial scales;
· Provide information that is required for assessing efficacy of existing water-related
policies;
· Identify opportunities for saving or making more productive and/or equitable use of
water;
· Identify the effectiveness of current drought and flood coping strategies;
· Identify potential problems resulting from competing or multiple uses of water;
· Assess the accuracy of government statistics;
· Identify the extent to which decision making is based on hydrological myths or
misconceptions.
Water Audit design philosophy
· Make maximum use of secondary baseline information (e.g. soil maps, remotely-
sensed data, etc.) and resource monitoring information (e.g. rainfall records,
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 88
groundwater levels, agricultural statistics etc.) that has been or is being collected by
government line departments and other organisations;
· Adopt an approach that builds on experience gained in different Water Audit and, in
particular, include systematic collection of social and institutional data;
· Use GIS software to consolidate spatial information and, where necessary, reconcile
differences between administrative and physical boundaries;
· Ensure maximum involvement of specialists who have long experience of working
in this area;
· Encourage the active involvement of line department staff.
Availability of natural resources, particularly land and water, for people of India is
inequitable at global level. Presently, with 2.4 per cent of land and 4 per cent of water
resources, India has to support 16 per cent of world’s population and 15 per cent of
livestock. India gets an average precipitation of 4000 billion cubic meters (BCM) per
annum. Precipitation is highly unevenly distributed with respect to time and space, over
the country. As much as 75% of total average annual precipitation occurs in 4 months of
monsoon period. Even during the monsoon months, about 50% of total annual rainfall
takes place only in 15 days and in less than 100 hrs. As far as spatial unevenness is
concerned, the average rainfall in Meghalaya is 10900 mm, whereas, in Rajasthan it is as
low as 100 mm against the national average annual rainfall of 1100 mm. On the other hand
demand for fresh water is increasing with every passing day. It is not only due to rapid
population growth alone, but also on account of many other factors such as rise in per
capita water demand arising out of continuous upward movement of living standards,
increased reliance on irrigated agriculture, massive urbanization and industrialization etc.
As per the present indication, population of the country may stabilize by the year 2050 at
around 1.6 billions. The available utilizable water resource of the country is considered
insufficient to meet all future needs. Under such a situation, in order to face the challenge of
water deficit, apart from accelerating pace of development of available utilizable water
resources, all out efforts, on the part of people from every walk of life, would need to be
made to conserve every drop of water and improve efficiency in all areas of water use.
With a view to improving performance of irrigation programme and to increase
productivity per drop of water, “Performance Evaluation Studies of Irrigation Projects”
have been taken up in the country since the seventies. Central Water Commission started
such exercise since the 8th plan period. So far (till the end of Ninth Five Year Plan)
performance evaluation studies of 110 major and medium irrigation projects from various
regions / states of the country have been successfully accomplished by the Central Water
Commission (CWC), State Governments, Central Board of Irrigation and Power (CBIP) and
Ministry of Water Resources (MOWR), Govt. of India. Ten irrigation projects have been
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 89
identified for undertaking post project evaluation studies in the tenth five year plan by
Central Water Commission. Besides performance evaluation of irrigation projects,
benchmarking of irrigation systems has also been taken up since 2002. Benchmarking may
provide an effective tool for measurement of relative performance of irrigation projects
and suggest ameliorative measures for performance improvement.
Though water audit is not a new concept, yet, no guidelines for water audit is available in
the country. Keeping this in view, Central Water Commission has taken a lead role to bring
out “General Guidelines for Water Audit”.
The “General Guidelines for Water Audit” have been prepared as conceptual guidelines to
cover broadly three main sectors of water use viz. irrigation, domestic and industrial. The
aims and objectives of these guidelines are to introduce, standardize and popularize the
water audit system for conservation of water in all sectors of water use and improve the
water use efficiency.
As hydro-dynamics and hydrology are stochastic in nature depending on various surprises,
intrinsically each and every project or water management system is unique in character.
Departments, Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), Agencies and other such organizations of
Central and State Governments, Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) working for
sustainable development of water resources, may formulate comprehensive guidelines
considering state-specific, region-specific and project specific needs, based on these
conceptual guidelines and keeping in view local/regional perspectives and aspirations.
2.0 STEPS OF WATER AUDIT
2.1 Water Supply and Usage Study
Water audit comprises of preparation of layout of water sources, distribution network,
service/delivery points to water users and return flow of waste or excess water. The layout
should include locations and capacities of flow measurement devices installed at key
points, dimensions of pipes and fittings in the water supply system, locations and
particulars of flow control devices and history sheets of all measuring and control devices
including pipes and fittings.
A study of the availability of water sources and past consumption patterns for various
sectors is necessary to understand the present water utilization and projecting future
requirement. Data on development of sustainable source of water through rainwater
harvesting and effluent recycling should also be taken into consideration.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 90
2.2 Process Study
Flow measurement devices may be installed at all strategic points so that water losses from
various components such as raw water source, conveyance system from raw water source
to treatment plant, from treatment plant to treated water storage system, treated water
storage system to distribution networks, individual users, etc. could be assessed at regular
intervals. Such studies will also prove useful for future extension, renovation and
modernization of the system.
Water quality of the distribution system needs to be monitored regularly at strategic points
to find out the level and nature of contaminants present in the supplied water. Depending
on the types of application and degree of purity needed, the treatment system can be
designed and developed. The water distribution system, leakage assessment etc. will form
an integral part of this study.
2.3 System Audit
The current water usages and systems for water use under various sectors such as
irrigation, industry and commerce, hydropower, domestic water supply, thermal power
and others need to be studied to check their operational efficiency and level of
maintenance. The scope for any modification or up-gradation will depend on the status of
existing systems. Measurement methodology from the intake point of the system through
various sub-systems to the ultimate user points needs to be verified periodically for its
suitability, efficiency and accuracy. Bulk metering should be done at the source for zones,
districts etc. and revenue metering for consumers. This will help in identifying the reaches
of undue wastewater generation.
2.4 Discharge Analysis
The domestic wastewater, return flows from irrigation, and effluents from the industries
need to be studied for conformity to environment standards, possibility of recovery of
valuable by-products and the opportunity for recycling of waste water.
2.5 Water Audit Report
Adequate planning and standard procedures are necessary prior to undertaking the water
audit of a system. A water audit can be accomplished on the basis of water allotted for a
service and water actually utilized for that service. After assessing the loss of water and the
efficiency of the system, steps needed for utilization of recoverable water loss may be
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 91
listed. A cost-benefit study for optimum recovery of water loss may be performed. A water
audit report may, invariably, contain:
(a) amount of water earmarked/made available to the service.
(b) amount of water utilized, both through metered and unmetered supplies.
(c) water loss and efficiency of the system along with reasons for such water losses.
(d) Suggested measures to check water loss and improve efficiency.
An effective water audit report may be purposeful in detection of leak in distribution
system, taking timely action for plugging such leaks and thereby reducing conveyance
losses of water and improving efficiency of the system. Water audit of the system should be
undertaken at regular interval of time, at least on an annual basis.
3.0 IRRIGATION
Irrigation is the major consumer of water accounting for about 83 percent of the current
level of total water utilization in the country. It is estimated that with increasing demand
from other competing sectors, the availability of water for irrigation sector is likely to
reduce progressively to about 70 percent in future. Irrigated agriculture is therefore,
considered a thrust area for achieving maximum conservation in water use. Even a
marginal improvement in the efficiency of water use in irrigation sector will result in
saving of substantial quantity of water which can be utilized either for extending the
irrigated area or for diverting the saving to other sectors of water use.
3.1 Water Demand
In irrigation sector, water demand is region specific depending upon the type of soil,
cropping pattern/practices, climatic condition, etc. Irrigation water demand also depends
upon the type of infrastructure, conveyance system, water application technique etc.
Among various methods available for working out irrigation water demand, Modified
Penman Method Ψ is considered the most suitable and is recommended for assessing crop
water demand.
As a first step, crop evapotranspiration (Et Crop) is assessed. The crop water requirement
can then be worked out, in consideration of percolation losses and other requirements like
pre-sowing / land preparation, transplantation requirements etc., as applicable. The
quantity of water actually used by the plants for their growth is termed as consumptive
use. The Net Irrigation Requirement (NIR) is then worked out by deducting effective
rainfall from the consumptive water use. The effective rainfall may meet only part of crop
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 92
water demand. It may be insignificant in arid areas but may be a major portion in humid
areas.
3.2 Irrigation Efficiencies
3.2.1 Field Application Efficiency (Ef)
On application of water to fields, a part of it gets evaporated, another part goes as losses
(run off, percolation loss, etc) and the remaining is used by the crops to meet
evapotranspiration needs. Actual quantity of irrigation water required to be released at
field head is called Field Irrigation Requirement (FIR). Field application efficiency (Ef)
takes into consideration above losses in application of irrigation water and may be defined
as ratio of Net Irrigation Requirement (NIR) over Field Irrigation Requirement (FIR) i.e. Ef
=NIR/FIR
The field application efficiencies considered for Irrigation Planning for ponded and non-
ponded crops are,
(a) Ponded Crops 80% to 85%
(b) Non-ponded crops 65%
Ψ “A Guide for Estimating Irrigation Water Requirement”, July, 1984 of Water
Management Division, Ministry of Water Resources, New Delhi
The Field Irrigation Requirement can then be estimated as a ratio of Net Irrigation
Requirement and Field Application Efficiency i.e. NIR/Ef The actual field application
efficiency and total application loss can also be worked out by taking measurement of the
water released at the field head (Field Irrigation Requirement) and working out Net
Irrigation Requirement (NIR) as discussed above.
3.2.2 Conveyance Efficiency (Ec)
Conveyance Efficiency may be defined as a ratio of water released at the field head (FIR) to
irrigation water needed to be released at the canal head. The quantity of water required to
be released at the canal head is termed as Gross Irrigation Requirement (GIR).
Therefore, Conveyance Efficiency (Ec) =FIR/GIR
Depending upon the type of distribution system (lined, unlined, partially lined canal
system) the following values for conveyance efficiency are taken for planning.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 93
(a)For fully lined system 70% to 75%
(b)For partially lined system 65%
(c)For unlined canal system 60%
From the above relationship, Gross Irrigation Requirement
(GIR) = FIR / Ec
The actual conveyance efficiency and actual conveyance loss can be worked out by taking
measurement of the water released at the canal head (Gross Irrigation Requirement) and
that at the field head (Field Irrigation Requirement).
3.3 Water Audit
As one step ahead of evaluation studies and benchmarking of irrigation projects, water
audit is required to be made applicable to all irrigation systems. The measurement of water
is essential for calculation of water losses during conveyance in canal and distribution
network and also during application in the field. Some of the methods that can be used for
measurement of actual quantity of water delivered are (a) Velocity Area Method, (b) Weir
Method and (c) Meter Flume Method.
Complete records of water withdrawn from the reservoir or the river system and of water
that flows through the various branches, distributaries and other network channels and at
outlets as well as water flowing through escapes are needed to be maintained.
Simultaneously, record of rainfall, crops sown, area irrigated and depth of water provided
are also required to be maintained. Actual conveyance and field application losses and
efficiencies of an irrigation system can be calculated from such records. Various proformae
required for water audit in irrigation system (as are in use by Govt. of Maharashtra) are
available.
Analysis of the data collected as outlined in the performae will give the actual conveyance
and field application efficiencies. These efficiencies are to be compared with the planned /
achievable efficiencies to assess the scope for improvement. The corrective measures need
to be taken accordingly.
3.4 Implementing Agencies
State Governments should form Water Audit Cells under Monitoring Units in their Water
Resources Departments. The Project Authorities will maintain the water account and
Monitoring Unit of Irrigation/Water Resources Departments can be given the
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 94
responsibility of carrying out the water audit. The number of projects to be audited by a
Water Audit Cell may depend upon the size of the irrigation projects.
Government of Maharashtra has formed a ‘Water Audit cell’ to carry out water audit of
1229 projects and issued first report in this regard in March 2005.The report can be seen in
the aforesaid web site of Government of Maharashtra.
4.0 DOMESTIC
Domestic water is a basic need for human as well as livestock. The main objective of
domestic water supply system is to provide safe and clean water in adequate quantity at
reasonable cost. For sustainability, the planning may be required at national level as a
whole for policies and subsequently at state or region or at community levels. Lot of waste
water is generated specially in urban areas. It is estimated that return flow from urban and
rural uses is about 50% of supplies and pollute the very fresh water resources. It is
expected that 85 percent of the return flow would go the surface water source and balance
15 percent to ground water source. There are considerable losses in the distribution
system on account of leakages due to networks being old and poor maintenance in addition
to lack of efforts towards conservation.
4.1 Per Capita Water Requirement
The quantity of water required for domestic purposes depends mainly on habits, social
status, climatic conditions and customs of the people. The per capita water requirement in
urban areas is more than that in the rural areas. As per yardstick of the Union Ministry of
Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation, water requirement for domestic purposes in
urban areas is 40 litres per capita per day (lpcd) in case of supply through public stand
posts and 70 lpcd in the case of supply through house service connections, where no
sewerage system is existing or contemplated. Where sewerage system is existing or
contemplated, water supply would be 135 lpcd in the urban areas. In the case of
metropolitan cities having population of more than 1 million, the domestic water supply
would be 150 lpcd. Over and above the aforesaid demand, 15% losses may be allowed for
determining the quantity of raw water required.
4.2 Transmission Losses
A study undertaken by the Ministry of Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation through
NEERI, Nagpur has revealed that about 30 to 50% of the water produced and supplied in
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 95
the cities goes as waste through leakages in the distribution system. About 80% of the
aforesaid losses are estimated in the household connections due to worn out pipes etc.
In view of this, the Ministry of Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation has emphasized
the need for control of unaccounted supply of water (nonrevenue water) through leak
detection programmes for identifying leakages and rectifying the same through suitable
replacement of pipelines. A manual containing details of various aspects of O&M of water
supply systems has been brought out by the Ministry of Urban Development & Poverty
Alleviation recently.
4.3 Water Audit
In domestic water supply, water audit is considered very important, since treatment of
water to bring it to drinking water standard costs a lot of money to the supplier. Water
audit helps in determining the amount of water lost from a distribution system due to
leakages etc. Water audit compares the amount of water supplied with the amount billed
and accounts for the water loss.
4.3.1 Water Measurement
For the purpose of water audit, bulk metering system should be devised zone-wise,
including group-consumer-wise in a system or a subsystem. This will facilitate
identification of the reaches where actually the wastage of water is taking place.
One can determine average daily water use by using one of the following two methods.
(a) Metered Water: In the case of metered water use, per capita per day consumption is to
be obtained by dividing water usage by the number of days in the billing period and also by
the number of residents of household.
(b) Unmetered Water: If water use is not metered, one must determine water use for each
fixture. Flow rates for showers and faucets can be determined by using a container and
stop watch to measure the amount of water discharged through the fittings in a minute.
Toilet use per flush can be approximated by the capacity of the flushing tank. After
determining the water use of each fixture, one will need to record the number of uses/ the
length of time each fixture is used to determine average daily water use. Alternately,
legitimate unmetered consumption can be worked out based on average domestic
(metered) consumption per capita per day for consumers having similar water use habits
plus an allowance for unmetered commercial consumption.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 96
A worksheet, similar to an accounting spreadsheet, should be developed. Such an exercise
makes the computations clear and simple and allows the utility to balance water supplied
with water used. For balancing water in and out of the distribution system, the worksheet
should list and account for various water usages. Worksheet may have adequate details of
the distribution system. A more detailed worksheet will provide better understanding of
the water usage and could be a useful tool for the service provider.
Distribution system characteristics vary and hence, each utility will have different
challenges in performing the water audit. Each utility will need to decide how it can
perform the audit accurately with the least cost. A worksheet should be developed, with a
set study period. A study period should be set considering evaluation of the complete water
system. Shorter periods might not give a complete picture of the water system, and longer
periods can be difficult to manage. One year is recommended because it includes all
seasons and gives enough time to eliminate the effect of meter reading lag.
Once the study period has been set and a worksheet has been developed, the audit can be
conducted. A set of model forms and instructions may be included that can be used if the
utility does not choose to develop one. Records should be compiled and meters should be
checked so that usages are recorded accurately. Once usages are computed, the worksheet
should then be filled in, and water delivered should be balanced with water used.
Unmetered uses should be documented along with the methods to quantify them. An
attempt to account for water loss should be made. Based on the findings of the audit,
options should be developed to reduce water losses.
While making adjustments to metered amounts, all adjustments and how they were
calculated should be properly documented. All records should reflect adjustments and such
adjustments should be verifiable. If adjustments are for significant amounts of water then
necessary changes in the system should be made to eliminate need for such adjustments in
the future. Adjustments could be known from the difference between storage in system at
the beginning and that at the end of the study period. Some difficulty might be there in
adjusting existing records to fit the study period. When meter-reading periods overlap,
some adjustments will be necessary to represent the study period. Some flow records
might have to be pro-rated so that all flow measurements reflect the same period. This
should be done carefully to ensure the accuracy of the audit.
A preliminary audit should be undertaken to determine the amount of water loss. If water
loss is significant, a more detailed study should be undertaken and accordingly measures
should be taken to reduce the loss.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 97
In addition to the above, a more thorough or comprehensive audit would include the
following:
(a) An inventory of meters
(b) Analysis of water loss and methods to reduce the loss
(c) Periodic checking for accuracy of meters
Inventory of meters may contain details such as types, sizes, and age of meters in the
distribution system. This will help in estimating the accuracy of the meters in a system on
wide scale. This can supplement the water usage information and show usage patterns in
the distribution system. It will also help any meter replacement program and cross-
connection control program. Possible corrective measures include leak detection
programs, meter replacement or installation programs, and conservation programs.
Factors to be considered for corrective measures may include:
(a) Where the losses occur
(b) How much loss is in each problem area
(c) What possible solutions exist
(d) Cost of the solutions, and
(e) Time to implement the solutions
It will be important to verify records and check meter accuracy, as these will affect the
accuracy of the audit. Records should be checked carefully to make sure that units are
correct, all measurements are included, measurements represent the same time period,
and that calculations are correct.
4.4 Water Losses and Follow up
There are two types of losses, real and apparent losses. Real loss includes water lost
through leakages in distribution systems, service connections, and storage tanks (including
overflow). Apparent loss includes meter and record inaccuracies and unauthorized water
uses such as theft and unauthorized connections. Unauthorized/Unmetered uses can be
considered a special type of water loss and they can also represent lost revenue and
therefore they should be estimated carefully.
If the unaccounted or unmeasured water loss is beyond permissible limit, it is
recommended to prepare a plan within a reasonable time period outlining steps necessary
for further identification and reduction of water losses. Such steps may include initiating or
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 98
expanding leak detection and repair program or eliminating unmetered accounts. Cost
benefit analysis should be conducted to choose the right option. If future annual audits
continue to show unmeasured water loss greater than the permissible limit, the plan for
reducing water losses should be updated.
Long term follow up should include updating the audit, reducing loss and checking meters.
After the first audit, areas where data is lacking should be identified and addressed.
Subsequent audits should provide greater accuracy and reduction of water losses.
5.0 INDUSTRY
Growing population and rising standard of living of people are pushing up demand for
quality industrial products at phenomenal pace. Thus the industrial requirement for water
is increasing day by day. As one of the large users of this precious resource, industry has an
important responsibility to practice water audit. Industries can realize many benefits from
the practice of water audit. By reducing consumption of water, industries will only effect
saving but also protect the environment.
Industrial effluents constitute a major source of polluted water and contain different kinds
of toxic pollutants. Treatment of industrial waste water is necessary to lower the
concentration of toxic pollutants to permissible limits. With the quality of water becoming
poor, availability of fresh water being scarce and statutory environmental regulations
becoming more stringent, optimization in use of water calls for a closer monitoring by
industrial sector.
5.1 Industries in India
As per Central Statistical Organization (CSO), there are about 32 lakhs industries in India in
the year 1998-99, out of which 1,35,551 are registered manufacturing industries.
Remaining industries are, in general, service industries like taxi stands, restaurants, hotels,
cafes, computer services, training institutes, shops, beauty parlours, tailoring etc. As per the
latest inventory of Central Pollution Control Board, there are about 8432 large and medium
polluting industries in India. The number of small-scale industries, which are polluting
cannot be ascertained due to many reasons. Most of them are located in unplanned areas
and in an unsystematic manner. Such industries are located even in residential areas. A
large number of them are not even registered.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 99
Summary of Recommendations of National Workshop for Water Audit and Water
Conservation Organized at New Delhi on 30th January 2004
Water is a precious natural resource. Its limited availability and increasing demand
prompted for drafting ‘Guidelines for Water Audit and Water Conservation’. These were
deliberated upon in a national level workshop organized at New Delhi in January, 2004,
jointly by Central Water Commission and Central Ground Water Board. Senior level officers
from various States, Central Ministries and NGOs attended the workshop.
Recommendations emerged in the seminar are as given below:
I. Water Audit
(i) Water audit is an important management tool for effective conservation of water.
Broadly water audit should be conducted categorically in two systems, resource audit or
supply side audit and the other one as consumption audit on demand side. All efforts
should be made for improvement of not only water use efficiency and distribution system,
but also on the efficient development and management of the source of water.
(ii) It has been strongly advocated that the water audit system needs to be framed and
incorporated in every significant water resources project as a routine exercise during
operation and maintenance of the project by the project authorities. A separate cell may be
constituted for this purpose. This is as per suggestion of Govt. of Maharashtra. They have
established a separate Chief Engineer’s Office for this purpose.
(iii) The periodicity of water audit and its report may be determined in advance at the
commencement of commissioning the project by the project authority and the concerned
Governments and appropriate provision of fund may be made for its implementation. In
general, it may be carried out annually.
(iv) The recommendations in the water audit report for corrective measures of the system
may be considered on priority for implementation by the competent authority. All efforts
should also be made to provide all technical and financial provisions in a time bound
manner.
(v) The irrigation sector utilizes about 83% of water as a major stakeholder. Due to the
thrust on account of rapid urbanization and modernization, the demands for domestic and
industrial uses are progressively increasing, thus creating a situation of competing of
demands from value added sectors of water use and threatening irrigation sector even in
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 100
maintaining current level of water use whereas more water is needed for growing more to
meet the demand of growing population. A systematic comprehensive water audit will be
very useful in bringing out the trend of changes on demand and supply scenario which will
help in deciding the methodology for improving the efficiency of the system by adopting
conjunctive use of surface and ground water, application of
modern irrigation techniques including drip and sprinkler irrigation wherever feasible and
other improvised agricultural devices in addition to development of wasteland and
waterlogged areas.
(vi) Due to over exploitation of ground water, the water table at vulnerable places like
thickly populated urban areas are depleting at very fast rate. Private tube wells are
mushrooming without control, to meet the growing demand. Industries should be
discouraged to exploit ground water on their own. As far as possible supplies to industries
should be from surface water and if ground water supply is considered essential, it should
be managed by a Government Agency. There is general apathy towards conjunctive use of
ground water and surface water. Specific water audit needs to be conducted on regular
basis for realistic assessment of ground realities and initiating remedial measures under
the umbrella of holistic approach.
(vii) Pollution level of fresh surface water and ground water resources are alarmingly
increasing due to excessive use of pesticides and fertilizers in agriculture and discharge of
untreated waste by industries and sewage disposal leading to health hazards and scarcity
of fresh water. Water audit from this angle needs to be conducted strategically and
periodically. The existing laws regarding pollution control need to be strictly observed by
not only imposing penalties but also restricting the polluters.
(viii) To prevent wastage of water, pricing of water for irrigation, domestic and industrial
uses needs to be revised and updated periodically so that subsidy is phased out as quickly
as possible and at least operation and maintenance cost is recovered for sustainability of
the system. Further,
gradually the pricing of water at flat rate system needs to be replaced by actual cost rate by
volume. The differential pricing system should also be suitably introduced keeping in view
the socio-economic aspects of the people and the region in addition to their life style and
ethnic background.
(ix) Benchmarking system of various suitable parameters for all sectors of water use may
be developed and introduced for optimizing and enhancing the efficiency of the system. It is
an effective tool for water audit and measurement of relative performance and suggests
ameliorative measures for performance improvement.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 101
(x) To identify source of water loss due to leakage, the approach of bulk metering system
should be installed at various well defined macro and micro systems like various zones,
districts, towns, colonies and even large group-consumers to single unit consumers so that
water audit can be effectively conducted.
II. Water Conservation
(i) Water Conservation is prime and challenging concern. Numerous types of water
conservation techniques are available in the country. The scientists constantly innovate the
new techniques, but there is a gap on the application of the appropriate technologies,
which needs to be removed. Due to lack of proper operation and maintenance in irrigation,
industry and domestic water distribution system, there is huge loss of water. Hence it is
emphasized to improve the O&M system.
(ii) For developing the water resources, age-old traditional water conservation methods
need to be judiciously adopted in conjunction with the latest modern conservation
technology. Keeping this in view, rain water harvesting, revival of traditional water
storages, check dams and other similar structures need to be adopted. Building byelaws
should be suitably modified to introduce mandatory roof top rain water harvesting.
(iii) In order to conserve precious fresh water, recycling of waste water may be
incorporated wherever feasible. Dual water supply system, one for treated wastewater and
the other for fresh water may be introduced so that treated waste water can be used for
secondary purposes such as toilets flushing, gardening, agriculture and selective industries
etc. New urban colonies, big hotels industries and other similar establishments should have
mandatory dual water supply systems.
(iv) Cropping pattern and crops water requirement varies from time to time due to the
dynamic socio-economic condition of the people and the region in addition to geo-
morphological, climatic and metrological changes. Hence, for effective management,
appropriate base line data for water demand under different situations needs to be brought
out for optimum crop water management and field activities considering effective rainfall
in different physiological stages.
(v) Night irrigation practice may be introduced to minimize evaporation loss thus
conserving irrigation water. Timely and need based irrigation should be done to minimize
loss of water. Further, for boosting productivity, rotational cropping pattern may be
introduced for balancing fertility of soil and natural pest control.
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 102
(vi) Various water savings devices are being developed under various ongoing R&D Programmes. These devices may be suitably adopted in the system. (vii) Strategic mass awareness campaign should be conducted regularly to cover all
stakeholders, including service providers and consumers, for water conservation in
irrigation, domestic and industrial sectors. Special attention must be given so that the fruits
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 103
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Kharsawan
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP
2
Sub Total-A 0.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 5000 0 2nd to 4th year 250.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 1000 0 2nd to 4th year 45.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 40 9000 2nd to 4th year 800.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 20 4500 2nd to 4th year 300.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 50 500 2nd to 4th year 600.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 403 1088100 2nd to 4th year 1329.90
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 64 172800 2nd to 4th year 176.00
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 672 201600 2nd to 4th year 1209.60
11 Ponds- medium irrigation 85.00 10 1400000 850.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 24 3360000 384.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 5944.50
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 1000 4800000 3rd and 4th year 2850.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 1000 4800000 4th and 4th year 2250.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 3000 3600000 1st to 5th year 150.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of srip No 40.00 7 126000 2nd year to 4th year 280.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 2000 0 1st and 2nd year 4.00
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 2000 0 1st and 2nd year 4.00
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 100 0 1st and 2nd year 20.00
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 40 0 1st and 2nd year 0.40
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 500 0 1st and 2nd year 12.50
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 200 0 1st and 2nd year 40.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 104
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 2000 0 1st to 4th year 500.00
13326000 Sub Total-C 6110.90
24
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 50 135000 1st and 2nd year 165.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 15 40500 1st and 2nd year 41.25
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 12 180000 1st and 2nd year 21.00
27 Checkdams No 5.00 10 1125 1st and 2nd year 50.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 160 8640 1st and 2nd year 19.20
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 160 8640 1st year to 3rd year 19.20
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 225 0 2nd year to 3rd year 18.00
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 225 0 3rd year to 3rd year 54.00
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 56 0 4th year to 3rd year 33.60
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 22 330 5th year to 3rd year 66.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 45 6th year to 3rd year 13.50
374235 Sub Total-D 487.25
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 400 3000000 1st year to 3rd year 1320.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 800 160000 1st year to 3rd year 680.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 137 7398 1st year to 3rd year 16.44
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 34 0 1st year to 3rd year 10.20
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 136 0 1st year to 3rd year 10.88
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 162 0 1st year to 3rd year 194.40
41 Drinking water No 1.75 613 0 1st year to 3rd year 1072.75
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 786 42444 1st year to 3rd year 188.64
43 Well No 1.75 114 0 1st year to 5th year 199.50
3209842 Sub Total-E 3692.81
44 DoLR-MoRD IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 382.84
Grand Total 41330950.85 Grand Total 16618.30
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 105
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Kuchai
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP
2
Sub Total-A 0.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 4000 0 2nd to 4th year 200.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 1200 0 2nd to 4th year 54.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 35 7875 2nd to 4th year 700.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 12 2700 2nd to 4th year 180.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 45 450 2nd to 4th year 540.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 350 945000 2nd to 4th year 1155.00
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 50 135000 2nd to 4th year 137.50
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 500 150000 2nd to 4th year 900.00
11 Ponds- medium irrigation 85.00 8 1120000 680.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 20 2800000 320.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 4866.50
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 1200 5760000 3rd and 4th year 3420.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 1200 5760000 4th and 4th year 2700.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 2500 3000000 1st to 5th year 125.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of drip No 40.00 10 180000 2nd year to 4th year 400.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 2400 0 1st and 2nd year 4.80
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 2400 0 1st and 2nd year 4.80
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 200 0 1st and 2nd year 40.00
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 50 0 1st and 2nd year 0.50
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 500 0 1st and 2nd year 12.50
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 100 0 1st and 2nd year 20.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 106
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 2400 0 1st to 4th year 600.00
14700000 Sub Total-C 7327.60
24
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
27 Checkdams No 5.00 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st year to 3rd year 0.00
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 0 0 2nd year to 3rd year 0.00
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 0 0 3rd year to 3rd year 0.00
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 0 0 4th year to 3rd year 0.00
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 0 0 5th year to 3rd year 0.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 0 6th year to 3rd year 0.00
0 Sub Total-D 0.00
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 700 5250000 1st year to 3rd year 2310.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 1200 240000 1st year to 3rd year 1020.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 150 8100 1st year to 3rd year 18.00
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 55 0 1st year to 3rd year 16.50
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 236 0 1st year to 3rd year 18.88
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 162 0 1st year to 3rd year 194.40
41 Drinking water No 1.75 500 0 1st year to 3rd year 875.00
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 600 32400 1st year to 3rd year 144.00
43 Well No 1.75 200 0 1st year to 5th year 350.00
5530500 Sub Total-E 4946.78
44 DoLR-MoRD IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 0.00
Grand Total 44651373.85 Grand Total 17140.88
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 107
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Chandil
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP Swarnrekha project No 700.00 2 18000000 1st year to 3rd year 1400.00
2
Sub Total-A 1400.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 5000 0 2nd to 4th year 250.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 1000 0 2nd to 4th year 45.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 20 4500 2nd to 4th year 400.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 10 2250 2nd to 4th year 150.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 40 400 2nd to 4th year 480.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 400 1080000 2nd to 4th year 1320.00
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 50 135000 2nd to 4th year 137.50
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 400 120000 2nd to 4th year 720.00
11 Ponds- medium irrigation 85.00 10 1400000 850.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 10 1400000 160.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 4512.50
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 1500 7200000 3rd and 4th year 4275.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 1500 7200000 4th and 4th year 3375.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 3000 3600000 1st to 5th year 150.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of drip No 40.00 7 126000 2nd year to 4th year 280.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 2000 0 1st and 2nd year 4.00
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 2000 0 1st and 2nd year 4.00
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 100 0 1st and 2nd year 20.00
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 40 0 1st and 2nd year 0.40
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 500 0 1st and 2nd year 12.50
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 200 0 1st and 2nd year 40.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 108
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 2000 0 1st to 4th year 500.00
18126000 Sub Total-C 8660.90
24
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 20 54000 1st and 2nd year 66.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 10 27000 1st and 2nd year 27.50
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 10 150000 1st and 2nd year 17.50
27 Checkdams No 5.00 2 225 1st and 2nd year 10.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 30 1620 1st and 2nd year 3.60
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 30 1620 1st year to 3rd year 3.60
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 40 0 2nd year to 3rd year 3.20
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 40 0 3rd year to 3rd year 9.60
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 25 0 4th year to 3rd year 15.00
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 20 300 5th year to 3rd year 60.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 10 6th year to 3rd year 3.00
234765 Sub Total-D 216.00
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 800 6000000 1st year to 3rd year 2640.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 2000 400000 1st year to 3rd year 1700.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 150 8100 1st year to 3rd year 18.00
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 45 0 1st year to 3rd year 13.50
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 150 0 1st year to 3rd year 12.00
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 150 0 1st year to 3rd year 180.00
41 Drinking water No 1.75 400 0 1st year to 3rd year 700.00
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 600 32400 1st year to 3rd year 144.00
43 Well No 1.75 200 0 1st year to 5th year 350.00
6440500 Sub Total-E 5757.50
44
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 169.71
Grand Total 49222138.85 Grand Total 20716.61
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 109
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Ichagarh
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP Swarnrekha project No 700.00 2 18000000 1st year to 3rd year 1400.00
2
Sub Total-A 1400.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 3000 0 2nd to 4th year 150.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 1000 0 2nd to 4th year 45.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 40 9000 2nd to 4th year 800.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 20 4500 2nd to 4th year 300.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 50 500 2nd to 4th year 600.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 400 1080000 2nd to 4th year 1320.00
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 64 172800 2nd to 4th year 176.00
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 650 195000 2nd to 4th year 1170.00
11 Ponds- medium irrigation No 85.00 30 4200000 1st year to 4th year 2550.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 30 4200000 2nd year to 4th year 480.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 7591.00
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 2000 9600000 3rd and 4th year 5700.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 2000 9600000 4th and 4th year 4500.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 3000 3600000 1st to 5th year 150.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of drip No 40.00 7 126000 2nd year to 4th year 280.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 2000 0 1st and 2nd year 4.00
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 2000 0 1st and 2nd year 4.00
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 100 0 1st and 2nd year 20.00
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 40 0 1st and 2nd year 0.40
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 500 0 1st and 2nd year 12.50
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 110
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 200 0 1st and 2nd year 40.00
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 2000 0 1st to 4th year 500.00
22926000 Sub Total-C 11210.90
24
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 100 270000 1st and 2nd year 330.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 40 108000 1st and 2nd year 110.00
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 20 300000 1st and 2nd year 35.00
27 Checkdams No 5.00 10 1125 1st and 2nd year 50.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 200 10800 1st and 2nd year 24.00
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 200 10800 1st year to 3rd year 24.00
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 225 0 2nd year to 3rd year 18.00
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 225 0 3rd year to 3rd year 54.00
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 56 0 4th year to 3rd year 33.60
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 40 600 5th year to 3rd year 120.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 45 6th year to 3rd year 13.50
701325 Sub Total-D 798.60
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 600 4500000 1st year to 3rd year 1980.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 2000 400000 1st year to 3rd year 1700.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 300 16200 1st year to 3rd year 36.00
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 45 0 1st year to 3rd year 13.50
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 200 0 1st year to 3rd year 16.00
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 200 0 1st year to 3rd year 240.00
41 Drinking water No 1.75 400 0 1st year to 3rd year 700.00
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 600 32400 1st year to 3rd year 144.00
43 Well No 1.75 300 0 1st year to 5th year 525.00
4948600 Sub Total-E 5354.50
44
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 627.47
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 111
Grand Total 52996798.85 Grand Total 26982.47
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Kukru
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP
2
Sub Total-A 0.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 3000 0 2nd to 4th year 150.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 1000 0 2nd to 4th year 45.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 20 4500 2nd to 4th year 400.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 10 2250 2nd to 4th year 150.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 45 450 2nd to 4th year 540.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 350 945000 2nd to 4th year 1155.00
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 40 108000 2nd to 4th year 110.00
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 600 180000 2nd to 4th year 1080.00
11 Ponds- medium irrigation 85.00 10 1400000 850.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 24 3360000 384.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 4864.00
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 1400 6720000 3rd and 4th year 3990.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 1400 6720000 4th and 4th year 3150.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 3000 3600000 1st to 5th year 150.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of srip No 40.00 7 126000 2nd year to 4th year 280.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 2800 0 1st and 2nd year 5.60
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 2800 0 1st and 2nd year 5.60
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 100 0 1st and 2nd year 20.00
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 40 0 1st and 2nd year 0.40
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 112
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 500 0 1st and 2nd year 12.50
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 200 0 1st and 2nd year 40.00
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 2800 0 1st to 4th year 700.00
17166000 Sub Total-C 8354.10
24
DoLR-MoRD IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
27 Checkdams No 5.00 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st year to 3rd year 0.00
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 0 0 2nd year to 3rd year 0.00
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 0 0 3rd year to 3rd year 0.00
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 0 0 4th year to 3rd year 0.00
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 0 0 5th year to 3rd year 0.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 0 6th year to 3rd year 0.00
0 Sub Total-D 0.00
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 400 3000000 1st year to 3rd year 1320.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 2000 400000 1st year to 3rd year 1700.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 200 10800 1st year to 3rd year 24.00
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 34 0 1st year to 3rd year 10.20
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 200 0 1st year to 3rd year 16.00
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 150 0 1st year to 3rd year 180.00
41 Drinking water No 1.75 400 0 1st year to 3rd year 700.00
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 700 37800 1st year to 3rd year 168.00
43 Well No 1.75 300 0 1st year to 5th year 525.00
3448600 Sub Total-E 4643.20
44 DoLR-MoRD IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 0.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 113
Grand Total 45035473.85 Grand Total 17861.30
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Gamhariya
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP
2
Sub Total-A 0.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 4000 0 2nd to 4th year 200.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 1000 0 2nd to 4th year 45.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 40 9000 2nd to 4th year 800.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 20 4500 2nd to 4th year 300.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 50 500 2nd to 4th year 600.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 403 1088100 2nd to 4th year 1329.90
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 64 172800 2nd to 4th year 176.00
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 672 201600 2nd to 4th year 1209.60
11 Ponds- medium irrigation 85.00 10 1400000 850.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 24 3360000 384.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 5894.50
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 3000 14400000 3rd and 4th year 8550.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 3000 14400000 4th and 4th year 6750.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 3000 3600000 1st to 5th year 150.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of drip No 40.00 10 180000 2nd year to 4th year 400.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 4000 0 1st and 2nd year 8.00
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 4000 0 1st and 2nd year 8.00
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 100 0 1st and 2nd year 20.00
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 40 0 1st and 2nd year 0.40
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 114
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 500 0 1st and 2nd year 12.50
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 200 0 1st and 2nd year 40.00
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 2000 0 1st to 4th year 500.00
32580000 Sub Total-C 16438.90
24
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
27 Checkdams No 5.00 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st year to 3rd year 0.00
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 0 0 2nd year to 3rd year 0.00
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 0 0 3rd year to 3rd year 0.00
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 0 0 4th year to 3rd year 0.00
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 0 0 5th year to 3rd year 0.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 0 6th year to 3rd year 0.00
0 Sub Total-D 0.00
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 300 2250000 1st year to 3rd year 990.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 2000 400000 1st year to 3rd year 1700.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 200 10800 1st year to 3rd year 24.00
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 50 0 1st year to 3rd year 15.00
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 300 0 1st year to 3rd year 24.00
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 150 0 1st year to 3rd year 180.00
41 Drinking water No 1.75 400 0 1st year to 3rd year 700.00
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 600 32400 1st year to 3rd year 144.00
43 Well No 1.75 300 0 1st year to 5th year 525.00
2693200 Sub Total-E 4302.00
44 DoLR- IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 0.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 115
MoRD
Grand Total 59694073.85 Grand Total 26635.40
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Seraikela
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP
2
Sub Total-A 0.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 5000 0 2nd to 4th year 250.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 1000 0 2nd to 4th year 45.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 30 6750 2nd to 4th year 600.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 10 2250 2nd to 4th year 150.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 50 500 2nd to 4th year 600.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 350 945000 2nd to 4th year 1155.00
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 64 172800 2nd to 4th year 176.00
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 500 150000 2nd to 4th year 900.00
11 Ponds- medium irrigation 85.00 10 1400000 850.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 24 3360000 384.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 5110.00
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 1500 7200000 3rd and 4th year 4275.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 1500 7200000 4th and 4th year 3375.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 3000 3600000 1st to 5th year 150.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of srip No 40.00 7 126000 2nd year to 4th year 280.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 3000 0 1st and 2nd year 6.00
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 3000 0 1st and 2nd year 6.00
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 100 0 1st and 2nd year 20.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 116
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 40 0 1st and 2nd year 0.40
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 500 0 1st and 2nd year 12.50
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 200 0 1st and 2nd year 40.00
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 3000 0 1st to 4th year 750.00
18126000 Sub Total-C 8914.90
24
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
27 Checkdams No 5.00 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st year to 3rd year 0.00
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 0 0 2nd year to 3rd year 0.00
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 0 0 3rd year to 3rd year 0.00
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 0 0 4th year to 3rd year 0.00
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 0 0 5th year to 3rd year 0.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 0 6th year to 3rd year 0.00
0 Sub Total-D 0.00
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 300 2250000 1st year to 3rd year 990.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 2000 400000 1st year to 3rd year 1700.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 137 7398 1st year to 3rd year 16.44
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 34 0 1st year to 3rd year 10.20
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 136 0 1st year to 3rd year 10.88
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 162 0 1st year to 3rd year 194.40
41 Drinking water No 1.75 613 0 1st year to 3rd year 1072.75
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 786 42444 1st year to 3rd year 188.64
43 Well No 1.75 114 0 1st year to 5th year 199.50
2699842 Sub Total-E 4382.81
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 117
44
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 0.00
Grand Total 45246715.85 Grand Total 18407.71
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Rajnagar
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP
2
Sub Total-A 0.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 5000 0 2nd to 4th year 250.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 1000 0 2nd to 4th year 45.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 40 9000 2nd to 4th year 800.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 20 4500 2nd to 4th year 300.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 50 500 2nd to 4th year 600.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 403 1088100 2nd to 4th year 1329.90
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 64 172800 2nd to 4th year 176.00
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 672 201600 2nd to 4th year 1209.60
11 Ponds- medium irrigation 85.00 10 1400000 850.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 24 3360000 384.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 5944.50
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 2000 9600000 3rd and 4th year 5700.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 2000 9600000 4th and 4th year 4500.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 3000 3600000 1st to 5th year 150.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of srip No 40.00 7 126000 2nd year to 4th year 280.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 4000 0 1st and 2nd year 8.00
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 4000 0 1st and 2nd year 8.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 118
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 100 0 1st and 2nd year 20.00
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 40 0 1st and 2nd year 0.40
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 500 0 1st and 2nd year 12.50
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 200 0 1st and 2nd year 40.00
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 2000 0 1st to 4th year 500.00
22926000 Sub Total-C 11218.90
24
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 50 135000 1st and 2nd year 165.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 15 40500 1st and 2nd year 41.25
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 12 180000 1st and 2nd year 21.00
27 Checkdams No 5.00 10 1125 1st and 2nd year 50.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 160 8640 1st and 2nd year 19.20
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 160 8640 1st year to 3rd year 19.20
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 225 0 2nd year to 3rd year 18.00
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 225 0 3rd year to 3rd year 54.00
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 56 0 4th year to 3rd year 33.60
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 22 330 5th year to 3rd year 66.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 45 6th year to 3rd year 13.50
374235 Sub Total-D 487.25
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 300 2250000 1st year to 3rd year 990.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 2000 400000 1st year to 3rd year 1700.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 200 10800 1st year to 3rd year 24.00
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 40 0 1st year to 3rd year 12.00
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 200 0 1st year to 3rd year 16.00
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 300 0 1st year to 3rd year 360.00
41 Drinking water No 1.75 400 0 1st year to 3rd year 700.00
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 600 32400 1st year to 3rd year 144.00
43 Well No 1.75 300 0 1st year to 5th year 525.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 119
2693200 Sub Total-E 4471.00
44
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 382.84
Grand Total 50414308.85 Grand Total 22504.49
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Nimdih
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP Swarnrekha project No 700.00 1 9000000 1st year to 3rd year 700.00
2
Sub Total-A 700.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 5000 0 2nd to 4th year 250.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 1000 0 2nd to 4th year 45.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 40 9000 2nd to 4th year 800.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 20 4500 2nd to 4th year 300.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 50 500 2nd to 4th year 600.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 403 1088100 2nd to 4th year 1329.90
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 64 172800 2nd to 4th year 176.00
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 672 201600 2nd to 4th year 1209.60
11 Ponds- medium irrigation 85.00 10 1400000 850.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 24 3360000 384.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 5944.50
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 1800 8640000 3rd and 4th year 5130.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 1800 8640000 4th and 4th year 4050.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 3000 3600000 1st to 5th year 150.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of srip No 40.00 7 126000 2nd year to 4th year 280.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 3600 0 1st and 2nd year 7.20
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 3600 0 1st and 2nd year 7.20
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 120
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 100 0 1st and 2nd year 20.00
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 40 0 1st and 2nd year 0.40
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 500 0 1st and 2nd year 12.50
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 200 0 1st and 2nd year 40.00
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 3600 0 1st to 4th year 900.00
21006000 Sub Total-C 10597.30
24
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
27 Checkdams No 5.00 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st and 2nd year 0.00
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 0 0 1st year to 3rd year 0.00
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 0 0 2nd year to 3rd year 0.00
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 0 0 3rd year to 3rd year 0.00
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 0 0 4th year to 3rd year 0.00
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 0 0 5th year to 3rd year 0.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 0 6th year to 3rd year 0.00
0 Sub Total-D 0.00
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 300 2250000 1st year to 3rd year 990.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 2000 400000 1st year to 3rd year 1700.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 200 10800 1st year to 3rd year 24.00
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 30 0 1st year to 3rd year 9.00
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 200 0 1st year to 3rd year 16.00
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 100 0 1st year to 3rd year 120.00
41 Drinking water No 1.75 300 0 1st year to 3rd year 525.00
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 500 27000 1st year to 3rd year 120.00
43 Well No 1.75 300 0 1st year to 5th year 525.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 121
2687800 Sub Total-E 4029.00
44
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 0.00
Grand Total 48114673.85 Grand Total 21270.80
Proposed Budget for the District irrigation plan- Seraikela Kharsawan
Sl No District
Concerned Ministry
Component Activity Units Unit cost Quantity
Impounding capacity in Cum
Period of implementation
Estimated cost in Lakhs INR
1
Seraikela- Kharsawan
MoWR AIBP Swarnrekha project No 700.00 5 9000000 1st year to 3rd year 3500.00
2 0
Sub Total-A 3500.00
3
MoWR HKKP
Irrigation channels- New Mtr 0.05 39000 0 2nd to 4th year 1950.00
4 Irrigation channels- Renovated Mtr 0.05 9200 0 2nd to 4th year 414.00
5 Checkdams-New No 20.00 305 68625 2nd to 4th year 6100.00
6 Checkdams-Renovated No 15.00 142 31950 2nd to 4th year 2130.00
7 Stop dam with diversion channels-Weir No 12.00 430 4300 2nd to 4th year 5160.00
8 Ponds- New No 3.30 3462 9347400 2nd to 4th year 11424.60
9 Ponds- Renovation No 2.75 524 1414800 2nd to 4th year 1441.00
10 Percolation tanks No 1.80 5338 1601400 2nd to 4th year 9608.40
11 Ponds- medium irrigation 85.00 108 15120000 1st year to 4th year 9180.00
12 Renovation of other water bodies No 16.00 204 28560000 2nd year to 4th year 3264.00
24420873.85 Sub Total-B 50672.00
13
MDA & W-DAC & FW
Per Drop More Crop
Drip Irrigation system No 2.85 15400 73920000 3rd and 4th year 43890.00
14 Sprinkler Irrigation system No 2.25 15400 73920000 4th and 4th year 34650.00
15 Mulching with crop residue Ha 0.05 26500 31800000 1st to 5th year 1325.00
16 Lift irrigation systems with provision of drip No 40.00 69 1242000 2nd year to 4th year 2760.00
17 Awareness about water saving measures Families 0.00 25800 0 1st and 2nd year 51.60
18 Training on Drip/sprinkler Families 0.00 25800 0 1st and 2nd year 51.60
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 122
19 Extesion activities training Villages 0.20 1000 0 1st and 2nd year 200.00
20 Training on watershed based activties Families 0.01 370 0 1st and 2nd year 3.70
21 Training for user groups Groups 0.03 4500 0 1st and 2nd year 112.50
22 Training on water audit Members 0.20 1700 0 1st and 2nd year 340.00
23 Crop technology promotion Families 0.25 21800 0 1st to 4th year 5450.00
180882000 Sub Total-C 88834.40
24
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP
Ponds No 3.30 220 594000 1st and 2nd year 726.00
25
Seraikela- Kharsawan
Pond-Renovation No 2.75 80 216000 1st and 2nd year 220.00
26 Renovation of other water bodies No 1.75 54 810000 1st and 2nd year 94.50
27 Checkdams No 5.00 32 3600 1st and 2nd year 160.00
28 Contour trench Ha 0.12 550 29700 1st and 2nd year 66.00
29 Staggered contour trench Ha 0.12 550 29700 1st year to 3rd year 66.00
30 Soil treatment Ha 0.08 715 0 2nd year to 3rd year 57.20
31 Field bunding Ha 0.24 715 0 3rd year to 3rd year 171.60
32 Water absorption trench No 0.60 193 0 4th year to 3rd year 115.80
33 Earthen checkdams No 3.00 104 1560 5th year to 3rd year 312.00
34 Plantations Ha 0.3 145 6th year to 3rd year 43.50
1684560 Sub Total-D 1989.10
35
MoRD MGNREGA
Ponds No 3.30 4100 30750000 1st year to 3rd year 13530.00
36 Dovas No 0.85 16000 3200000 1st year to 3rd year 13600.00
37 Trench Ha 0.12 1674 90396 1st year to 3rd year 200.88
38 Plantation Ha 0.30 367 0 1st year to 3rd year 110.10
39 Gully Pluggs No 0.08 1758 0 1st year to 3rd year 140.64
40 Land levelling Ha 1.20 1536 0 1st year to 3rd year 1843.20
41 Drinking water No 1.75 4026 0 1st year to 3rd year 7045.50
42 30/40 model Ha 0.24 5772 311688 1st year to 3rd year 1385.28
43 Well No 1.75 2128 0 1st year to 5th year 3724.00
District Irrigation Plan- Seraikela Kharsawan 2016
Geo Informatics for Social Development- Ranchi Page 123
34352084 Sub Total-E 41579.60
44
DoLR-MoRD
IWMP Cost for other activities under IWMP 1st year to 5th year 1562.86
Grand Total 241339517.8 Grand Total 188137.96