diverse use of surveys contribute to understanding students and improving courses
DESCRIPTION
Diverse Use of Surveys Contribute to Understanding Students and Improving Courses. Leo F. Denton and Dawn McKinney http://www.cis.usouthal.edu/~mckinney/FIE2005.ppt. Diverse Use of Surveys. Rationale for using surveys Factors measured Findings The instruments Professional practices Tips. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Diverse Use of Surveys Contribute to
Understanding Students and Improving Courses
Leo F. Denton and Dawn McKinneyhttp://www.cis.usouthal.edu/~mckinney/FIE2005.ppt
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
Diverse Use of SurveysRationale for using surveysFactors measuredFindingsThe instrumentsProfessional practicesTips
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
Use of Surveys Understanding students
Educational research
Improvement of courses
Evaluation of student performance
Student self-reflection
Quantitative measures of affective development
Correlation between affective development and cognitive achievement
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
American Association for Higher Education’s Support for Affective Assessment
Learning “involves not only knowledge and abilities but values, attitudes, and habits of mind that affect both academic success and performance beyond the classroom.”
Nine Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning (2003)
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
Obstacles to achievement/retention
Non-sustained student interest Inadequate faculty and peer support Attraction of other disciplines Difficulty of discipline Class sizes Inadequate prior knowledge Intimidating atmosphere Personal problems
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
Affective Factors Measured(1) Competence and lack of pressure
(2) Value and interest
(3) Effort
(4) Student-peer belonging
(5) Student-faculty belonging
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
FindingsAffective Factors
Student interest, belonging, effort, lack of pressure, perceived competence, and value correlate with course grade
These factors often decrease during the course of the semester
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
FindingsObjectives
Sections using systematic affective objectives and strategies have higher levels of affective factors and higher course completion rates
Affective factors impact all students including women and minorities
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
FindingsInternalization
The internalization of professional practices can be accomplished in introductory courses and correlates with higher course grades
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
Assessment Instruments Quantitative
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) Institutional Integration Scale Anderson-Butcher Belonging
Scale Qualitative
Peer Evaluations BAM chart
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
Sample ItemsFactor Item Perceived Competence Value
Effort
Lack of Pressure
Overall Belonging
Faculty Belonging
Interest
Peer Belonging
I am satisfied with my performance in this course.
I think that this course is important because it will help me obtain my goals.
It is important for me to do well in this course.
I have been very relaxed while programming on my laptop.
I think that I have been a valued member of this class.
I have been accepted by the course instructor.
Learning computer language syntax has not held my attention.
I have been accepted by the students in this class.
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
National Association of Colleges and Employers’ Top-10 characteristics most wanted in college graduates Communication skills Honesty/integrity Teamwork skills Interpersonal skills Motivation/initiative Strong work ethic Analytical skills Flexibility/adaptability Computer skills Organizational skills
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
The Good The Bad The Ugly
Communication
“He is good at explaining things to those who are not grasping a particular concept.”
“He sometimes talks over weaker members.”
“Maybe you should discuss appropriate behavior toward women with him.”
Cooperation
“A good quality is her positive attitude and willingness to participate and help where needed.”
“Does not contribute to group discussions/effort noticeably or effectively.”
“I think he talks out of turn, his comments are inappropriate, and he is disrespectful toward the customer.”
Work Ethic
“She is willing to learn and take extra steps to dig for material. I feel she is determined to do well.”
“He is normally absent and when present never wants to work on the project.”
“Sleeps during class, is absent a lot, doesn’t really help during lab, just kind of sits back and watches”
Sample peer evaluations data
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
BAM Chart
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
Leo F. Denton, Dawn McKinney, and Michael V. Doran. Integrated Use of Bloom and Maslow for Instructional Success in Technical and Scientific Fields, ASEE, Montreal, Canada (2002).
Leo F. Denton, Dawn McKinney, and Michael V. Doran. Promoting Student Achievement with Integrated Affective Objectives, ASEE, Nashville, Tennessee, USA (2003).
Dawn McKinney and Leo F. Denton. Houston, we have a problem: there’s a leak in the CS1 affective oxygen tank, SISCSE, Norfolk, VA, March 2004.
Dawn McKinney, Julie Froeseth, Jason Robertson, Leo F. Denton, and David Ensminger. Agile CS1 Labs: eXtreme Programming Practices in an Introductory Programming Course, XPAU 2004, Calgary, Canada, August 15-18, 2004.
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
Leo F. Denton and Dawn McKinney. Affective Factors and Student Achievement: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study, FIE, Savannah, GA (2004).
Dawn McKinney and Leo F. Denton. Affective Assessment of Team Skills in Agile CS1 Labs: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, SISCSE, St. Louis, MO February 23-27, 2005.
Leo F. Denton, Dawn McKinney, and Michael V. Doran. A Melding of Educational Strategies to Enhance the Introductory Programming Course, FIE, Indianapolis, IN (2005).
http://www.cis.usouthal.edu/~mckinney/affective_papers.htm
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
TipsChoose factorsSpecific activitiesStudent benefitsThoughtful responsesSpecific belonging Idealism & burnout
FIE 2005Indianapolis, Indiana
School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
Leo F. [email protected]
Dawn [email protected]
http://www.cis.usouthal.edu/~mckinney/FIE2005Panel.ppt