d.j. boehm and w.a. berzonsky

18
The Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Frozen Dough End-Use Quality in Hard Red Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Upload: teryl

Post on 15-Jan-2016

48 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Frozen Dough End-Use Quality in Hard Red Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky. Objectives. 1. To study nitrogen effects on quality of HRSW 2.To study increased GPC effects on fresh and frozen dough - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

The Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates onFrozen Dough End-Use Quality in Hard Red

Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Page 2: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Objectives

1. To study nitrogen effects on quality of HRSW

 

2. To study increased GPC effects on fresh and frozen dough

3. To determine if there is a correlation between increased N fertilizer applications and frozen dough quality 

Page 3: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Experimental Design

• Genotypes– Argent

– Glupro

– Grandin

– Trenton

• N Treatments– 0 kg ha -1

– 67 kg ha -1

– 134 kg ha -1

• ND Locations– Minot

– Carrington

– Casselton

– Plot design is a split-block (strip-plot)

– 3 replicates

Page 4: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Kernel Quality Characteristics

• Yield

• Protein

• Test weight

• Kernel brightness (L*)

• Falling number

• Kernel size, hardness, and weight

Page 5: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Dough Quality Characteristics

• Farinograph – Water absorption and flour strength

Page 6: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

• Extensigraph– Dough extensibility and resistance to extension

– Frozen samples stored at - 23oC for 90 days

Dough Quality Characteristics

Page 7: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

• Bread Baking– Bread quality through mixing time, proof height,

loaf volume, and loaf weight

– Frozen samples stored at - 23oC for 90 days

Dough Quality Characteristics

Page 8: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Results – Kernel Quality

*, **, and *** significant at P = 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively

Treatment Environment Genotype

Yield NS ** ***Protein ** *** ***Test Weight * *** ***L* Brightness NS * ***Falling # NS ** NSK. Hardness NS ** *K. Size NS *** NS

K. Weight NS *** NS

Page 9: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

N Effects on ProteinGrain Protein Content by Treatment

16.0

15.2

16.2

14.5

15.0

15.5

16.0

16.5

0 67 134

N Treatments - kg ha -1

% G

PC

Grain Protein Content by Genotype

14.615.2

18.5

14.9

1213141516171819

Argent Glupro Grandin Trenton

Genotypes

% G

PC

b

a a

bc

a

c b

a

Page 10: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

N Effects on YieldYield by N Treatment

1,960

2,1782,226

1,800

1,900

2,000

2,100

2,200

2,300

0 67 134

N Treatment - kg ha -1

Yie

ld -

kg

ha -1a

a

a

Yield by Genotype

2,2312,293

1,638

2,323

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

2,250

2,500

Argent Glupro Grandin Trenton

Genotype

Yie

ld -

kg

ha -1

a

a a a

b

Page 11: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Results – Fresh Dough Quality

*, **, and *** significant at P = 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively

Treatment Environment Genotype

H2O Abs. ** *** ***Arrival Time * ** ***Peak Time * *** ***Loaf Vol. ** *** NSLoaf Wt. NS ** ***45 Res to Ext. NS ** *45 Extensibility NS NS ***

Page 12: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Water Absorption by Treatment

68.4

69.6

70.0

67.5

68.0

68.5

69.0

69.5

70.0

70.5

0 67 134

N Treatment - kg ha -1

% A

bsor

ptio

n

N Effects on Water Absorption

b

aa

Water Absorption by Genotype

68.4

73.1

68.567.3

65.0

67.0

69.0

71.0

73.0

75.0

Argent Glupro Grandin Trenton

Genotype

% A

bsor

ptio

n

b

a

b b

Page 13: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

N Effects on Loaf Volume

Bread Loaf Volume by Treatment

216

222

230

205

210

215

220

225

230

235

0 67 134

N Treatment - kg ha -1

Loa

f V

olum

e -

cc

a

a

b

Page 14: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Results – Frozen Dough Quality

*, **, and *** significant at P = 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively

Treatment Environment Genotype

Proof Time NS NS NSLoaf Vol. NS NS NSLoaf Wt. NS NS NS45 Res to Ext. NS NS *45 Extensibility NS NS ***

Page 15: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Protein Correlations

*, **, and *** significant at P = 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively

Correlation

Yield - 0.36 **

Test Wt. - 0.77 ***

H2O Abs. 0.55 ***

Loaf Wt. 0.37 **

Frozen Loaf Wt. 0.57 ***

45 Res. To Ext. - 0.33 **

45 Extensibility 0.77 ***

Page 16: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Conclusions

• N treatments significantly increase GPC, water absorption, loaf volume, and Farinograph arrival and peak times

• Protein has significant positive correlations: – water absorption, arrival, peak, departure, and

stability times – extensibility – mixing time, loaf weight

Page 17: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

Conclusions

• Increased N treatments have no significant effect on frozen dough or bread quality in first year of study

Page 18: D.J. Boehm and W.A. Berzonsky

[email protected]

Acknowledgements: NDSU Cereal Science Dept.

The Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Frozen Dough End-Use Quality in Hard Red

Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)