cynthiadick.files.wordpress.com … · web viewinstructional coaching to improve student...
TRANSCRIPT
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 1 of 28
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement
07.750 Graduate Summative Seminar July 2017
Dr. Cam Symons
Cindy Dick
Brandon University
881649
Abstract
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 2 of 28
Coaching teachers can be used as a method to assist teachers with their professional knowledge
and practice and increase student achievement. Coaching can also provide administrators with a
strategy to distribute the leadership and support in a school. This paper will provide a definition
of instructional coaching, peer coaching, and mentoring. The effects of professional develop-
ment in relation to instructional coaching will be discussed. Results from research on instruc-
tional coaching will be included along with the benefits and limitations of using coaching to im-
prove student achievement. Also included will be a job description of an instructional coach, an
evidence based framework, as well as specific strategies for classroom application.
Keywords: instructional coaching, mentoring, instructional leader, reflective practice,
leadership, professional development, collaboration
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 3 of 28
Introduction:
School reform and improving student achievement is a goal that most schools and divi-
sions strive towards. Many schools in the United States have been feeling the pressure of stan-
dards testing and failing schools. School divisions and districts have been working towards re-
form for many years. In order to improve student learning, schools must improve the instruction
and therefore improve teacher ability. Helping teachers improve their teaching can come from
professional development. “Improving professional learning for educators is a crucial step in
transforming schools and improving academic achievement” (Wei, Darling-Hammond, Andrew,
Richardson, & Orphanos, 2009, p. ii). Most professional development sessions do not culminate
in the high results that administrators may desire. In fact, research states that in order to estab-
lish any long lasting change, “job-embedded professional development in collegial environments
falls short” (Wie, et. al., 2009, p. iii). Professional development that involves support in the area
of “intensive forms of support” is the most effective (Devine, Houssemand, & Meyers, 2013, p.
1126). Therefore, instructional coaching that provides ongoing support and intensity has been
proven to improve teachers’ instruction and increase student achievement (Devine, et. al., 2013,
1126).
A qualified instructional coach can provide this professional development. “Coaching is
a form of professional learning within classrooms that helps teachers develop strong plans, ob-
tain feedback, refine their practices, and examine results” (The University of Florida Lastinger
Center for Learning, 2016, p. 3). In my opinion, providing a coach for teachers, using specific
guidelines and strategies, may result in the largest impact on school reform.
Defining Instructional Coaching:
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 4 of 28
Peer coaching can be defined “as a collegial process whereby two faculty members vol-
untarily work together to improve or expand their approaches to teaching” (Huston & Weaver,
2007, p. 6). This model involves having two teachers collaboratively working together. Coach-
ing can involve a variety of approaches in the area of professional growth and evaluation.
Poglinco & Bach define coaching “as a process whereby seasoned teachers provide instructional
support, professional development opportunities, feedback, and materials to classroom teachers -
as a central means to improve instruction and build the capacity of school staff members”
(Poglinco & Bach, 2004, p. 398). Toll defines coaching as one who helps teachers to recognize
what they know and can do, assists teachers as they strengthen their ability to make more effec-
tive use of what they know and do, and support teachers as they learn more and do more (Toll,
2004, p. 5). This type of coaching model is supportive, and as stated above, works towards
teacher improvement.
An instructional coach is also defined as a “form of professional learning within the
classroom or school that helps teachers develop and apply new knowledge, make strong plans for
instruction and assessment, obtain feedback, refine their practices, and examine results” (The
University of Florida, 2016, p. 5). The teacher will work closely with the coach on a regular ba-
sis and the plan will be designed around the teacher’s needs and goals. This ongoing support is
provided in order to create change within the teachers’ instructional practices, and in turn, have
an impact on higher student achievement. The University of Florida report goes on to describe
three different types of approaches to coaching; peer coaching, (as described above), school-wide
coaching, and an accountable leadership team. This leadership team may be a representative
teacher from each grade level in a school that meets regular throughout the year with the admin-
istration. In the author’s experience, a well-represented team of teacher leaders can provide joint
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 5 of 28
responsibility for the leadership of a school community in the area of coaching, data analysis,
school planning, and student achievement. This leadership team becomes one part of a three
team member effort to establish communication and the development of key strategies for im-
provement. The three components of this team are the administrator, the instructional coach and
the teachers and staff (Spaulding & Smith, 2012, p. 5).
Koe and Neuman define coaching for teachers as opportunities with the following out-
comes:
• “To receive support and encouragement through the opportunity to review experiences,
discuss feelings, describe frustrations, and check perceptions with a partner.
• To fine-tune skills or strategies through technical feedback and technical assistance from
a coaching partner.
• To analyze practices and decision making at a conscious level.
• To adapt or generalize skills or strategies by considering what is needed to facilitate
particular outcomes, how to modify the skills or practice to better fit interactions with
specific families or practitioners or what results may occur from using the skills
or
practice in different ways.
• To reflect on what they perceive or how they are decisions, which helps improve their
knowledge and understanding of professional practices and activities” (Koe &
Neuman, 2006, p. 1).
“The purpose of an instructional coach is to work directly with and indirectly with teach-
ers, staff, and the building principals to improve the effectiveness of classroom instruction and
increase student learning, performance, and overall achievement; however, the instructional
coach cannot and will not be successful working solo in a school building” (Spaulding & Smith,
2012, p. 3). An effective instructional coach does not work in isolation, nor do they hold the re-
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 6 of 28
sponsibility of increased student achievement alone. An instructional coach becomes part of a
school leadership team in order to create change and growth.
Defining the Role of an Administrator:
An administrator seeks to be an instructional leader and coach. Huff, Preston & Goldring
discuss implementing a coaching program for school principals. “We define coaching in gen-
eral as a helping relationship between (1) a client with managerial authority in an organization
and (2) a consultant who uses a wide variety of behavioural techniques and methods to help the
client achieve a mutually identified set of goals, within a formally defined cooperative agreement
(Flaherty, 2005; Hargrove, 1995; Kilburg, 1996; Koonce, 1994; Thach and Heinselman, 2000)
(Huff et al., 2013, p. 503). An effective instructional leader should balance the relationship with
a coaching delivery in order to assist teachers with their teaching.
The process and steps involved in coaching can take a variety of approaches. The first
steps are usually a consult between the coach and the teacher where they discuss and decide on a
focus and identify the goals (Huston & Weaver, 2007, p. 9). The next couple of steps involve the
coach observing the teacher teach a lesson within a classroom setting followed with a debrief
session (Huston & Weaver, 2007, p. 9). The teacher will usually take the lead in identifying
what the goals are and work with the coach in a collaborative dialogue throughout the process.
This cycle would continue several times during a school year. “During coaching, teachers are
prompted to use a newly learned practice in a classroom setting while receiving feedback on
their performance from an expert” (Kretlow & Bartholomew, 2010, p. 280). Another approach
is from the administrator taking the role as an instructional leader and coach. There are two
types of coaching by principals; performance based which is specific to practices and bench-
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 7 of 28
marks and an in-depth coaching method that provides deeper cognitive or psychoanalysis issues
(Huff, Preston, Goldring, 2013, p. 507).
The principal that takes the role of coach, works closely with the teacher. The principal
will set up a pre-conference dialogue as the ‘groundwork’ in order to establish a relationship
with the teacher. After the relationship has been set and there is a level of trust, the instructional
leader can start to plan, observe and set goals with the teacher. Paramore uses a pre-conference
form to begin the dialogue and discuss the teacher’s perceived strengths and weaknesses, as well
as the makeup and challenges of the class being observed (Paramore, 2007, p. 73). She would
also use an observation form which includes notes on the lesson as well as an area addressing the
impact on learning and instructional considerations (Paramore, 2007, p. 74). At this stage, the
goals and the action begin to take shape. It is crucial for the conversations to continue at a deep
level with effective questions, strategies, and the types of changes that are necessary (Paramore,
2007, p. 76). Similar to Huston and Weaver’s procedure of coaching, Huff, Preston & Goldring
follow the same model from an administrators’ lens. The principal has the responsibility of mon-
itoring teacher practices, supervising and evaluating, therefore, taking the role of instructional
coach helps fulfill this role in a supportive manner while also expecting change in practices, if
necessary. “The work of coaches is squandered if school principals are not instructional leaders”
(Fullan & Knight, 2011, p. 53). Coaches can also establish a study group with a group of teach-
ers that further explores teaching strategies. “The coaches’ lesson study group offered an oppor-
tunity for coaches to build knowledge beyond that routinely expected for all elementary teach-
ers” (Lewis, Perry, Foster, Hurd, & Fisher, 2011, p. 67). According to Lewis, et al., evidence
shows that when teachers looked at research and data, a rich dialogue resulted in changes in the
teachers’ approaches to mathematical concepts (Lewis, et al., 2011, p. 67).
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 8 of 28
Defining Professional Development:
According to research, professional development has most impact when teachers are ac-
tively involved in the support (Sun, Penuel, Frank, Gallagher, & Youngs, 2013, p. 348). Profes-
sional development sessions that are conducted as a one day workshop may not be effective for
teacher change nor have positive results for student achievement. The learning that takes place
during the one day workshop is not applied on a regular basis and teachers often revert back to
old ways and traditional practices. Professional development that involves active learning for
teachers means the teacher retains an ongoing voice in the learning and the learning occurs over
a longer period of time. “Such active learning strategies may take place in the context of inten-
sive, multi-week professional development (Lieberman & Wood, 2003), protocol-driven discus-
sions of student work among peers (Horn & Little, 2010), peer observation of classroom instruc-
tion, or peer instructional coaching (Darling-Hammond et al., 2009)” (Sun, et.al, 2013, p. 347).
An instructional coach can provide this ongoing professional development for teachers. At
Brown University, The Annenberg Institute for School Reform, has conducted work in commu-
nities with disadvantaged children. Their findings have also indicated that coaching supports
school reform. “In our work, we support and encourage the use of instructional coaching, a
promising new professional development practice in which teacher leaders serve as coaches to
facilitate and guide content-focused professional learning for a school’s teachers” (King, Neu-
man, Pelchat, Potochnik, Rao, Thompson, 2014, p. 1). Experts have stated that professional de-
velopment that involves consistent support for teachers, as an instructional coach can provide,
will assist teachers in delivering high instructional practices with a reflective component that en-
courages collaboration in a safe professional environment. “Recent research on professional de-
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 9 of 28
velopment suggests that it is most effective when it includes components that are based in the
school and embedded in the job and when it increases teachers’ theoretical understandings of
their work (Miller, 1995)” (King, et al, 2014, p. 1).
Administrators are responsible for the professional development of their staff. It is the
job of the administrator to ensure high level of learning for their teachers that can be sustained
and boost the learning of their students. “The emergence of job-embedded professional develop-
ment as strategic support for teachers has enabled school leaders to provide teachers with person-
alized and prescriptive coaching and feedback in order to maximize impact on student achieve-
ment” (Knight, 2007). An instructional coach should be embedded within the staff, visible at all
times, and not an add-on visitor type of role. An administrator can ensure this type of profes-
sional development approach.
Staff need to be aware that the implementation of an instructional coach is a method of
professional development that has been proven to be effective and will create increase in student
achievement. Teachers need to be given opportunities to discuss the results of the implementa-
tion and allow their own results to indicate the change. “The model that we are proposing incor-
porates an additional component to a professional development model that allows teachers and
staff the opportunity to field-test these evidence-based strategies in their own classroom to deter-
mine for themselves if they are effective and truly work” (Spaulding & Smith, 2012, p. 99).
Research:
Administrators have an immense task of providing leadership in the area of supervision,
evaluation and professional growth. There are varying leadership styles that leaders may take on
and apply to their approaches in order to achieve the goals for the school. Administrators may
adapt a transformative leadership style or a distributed leadership style. The multiple tasks that
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 10 of 28
leaders are responsible, may move principals to delegate and use a distributed leadership style.
Busy principals strive to make the best use of their time and talents in their building. Bain &
Company conducted various research studies that indicate distributed leadership has had a posi-
tive impact on teachers. Bain & Company discovered that some urban schools in the United
States using professional learning communities, were not always effective due to the fact that
teachers were not asked to “develop and coach” (Bierly, Doyle, & Smith, 2016, p. 2). “By defi-
nition, instructional coaches play a significantly different role than either teacher leaders or PLC
leads. School systems have deployed them widely - often one or two per building - precisely to
provide the observation, coaching and feedback teachers aren't getting otherwise” (Bierly, et al,
2016, p. 12). The research indicated that coaching falls apart when there is a disconnect between
evaluation and instructional support, where the coach lacks “mandate and the authority to truly
lead” (Bierly, et al, 2016, p.13 ). The distribution in the leadership needs to allow the instruc-
tional teacher-coach to provide power in the area of leading their teachers. Denver Public
Schools have been piloting a distributed leadership model that shows 85% of the teachers com-
mented their “Team Lead is successful at both evaluating their practice and coaching them to im-
prove” (Bierly, et al, 2016, p. 14). “Districts like Denver are finding that the most effective
coaching and mentorship involves not only one-to-one observation and feedback, but also time
spent working together and collaborating to solve everyday problems” (Bierly, et al, 2016, p.
14). This type of distributed leadership may help teachers improve by accessing the talented in-
structional coaches in schools and qualified lead teachers to provide the coaching and evaluating
for improvement for the teachers.
The evolution of teacher coaches has developed into more content coaches in schools.
Content coaches have particularly concentrated on literacy or numeracy. One Florida research
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 11 of 28
on literacy studied the effects of literacy coaching on reading coaches that supported a Florida
initiative “Just Read, Florida”, established in 2001. Research showed that “40% of all reading
teachers and 40% of all social studies teachers reported that the reading coach had influenced
them to make changes in their instruction to a moderate or great extent” (Marsh, McCombs, &
Martorell, 2012, p. 19). The research goes on to examine the importance of coach quality, ex-
pertise in supporting adult leaners and educating administrators on hiring practices for effective
reading coaches (Marsh, et al, 2012, p. 20). Even though the research shows that two-thirds of
all of the teachers involved with the reading coach used the experience to help them plan and or-
ganize instruction, implementing a coach can not go without support and training (Marsh, et al,
2012, p. 20).
A research study conducted in five school districts in Virginia, analyzed the impact of el-
ementary numeracy coaches on elementary student achievement. During the three year study in
2005, students who were exposed to a “mathematics coach had significantly higher scores on
their state’s high-stakes standardized mathematics achievement tests (grades 3-5) than did stu-
dents in the control schools” (Cambell & Malkus, 2011, p. 450). Despite the higher scores after
the implementation of a math coach, the report goes on to emphasize that coaching is only im-
pactful when there is enough time for interaction and “active learning” with a focus on “mathe-
matics content and pedagogy, as well as on student understanding” (Cambell & Malkus, 2011, p.
451). The concept of simply placing an experienced teacher in a classroom as a numeracy coach
without support nor without time to develop a meaningful relationship will not be effective.
In Pennsylvania, there was a three year study focusing on a coaching model using four
strategies: one-on-one teacher engagement, evidence-based literacy practices applied across the
curriculum data analytics, and reflection on practice (Medrich, Fitzgerald, & Skomsvold, 2013,
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 12 of 28
p. 2). All teachers in this study were coached and the student achievement test results were com-
pared to schools that did not have instructional coaches. The results showed evidence in in-
creased reading results to the coaching schools (Medrich et al, 2013, p. 2). The results were con-
sistent with the previous research in the analysis with suggestions for the delivery of coaching re-
quires time and quality instructional programs in order to show improved student learning.
Research has shown that content coaches may not always have an impact on student
learning. “Theoretically, these leaders support collective collaborative professional develop-
ment, providing knowledgeable “critical collegiality” (Lord, 1994). But substantive change is
neither rapid nor consistent” (Cambell & Makus, 2011, p. 449). According to this data, coaches,
or the administrator, need training in order to be an effective coach. Coaching can have a posi-
tive impact on teachers providing there is follow-up support provided (Mangin & Dunsmore,
2015, p. 296). The effectiveness of a coaching model delivery is dependent on a sustained
amount of time provided for dialogue, reflection and collaboration rather than a one-time evalua-
tion that may omit the rich conversations. The use of coaching in teacher preparation takes this
into consideration as it moves beyond a “one-shot” training to guide teachers toward fidelity in
the classroom over time (Mangin & Dunsmore, 2015, p. 296).
It is clear from the research that instructional coaching can show gains in student achieve-
ment after teacher instructional practices are improved as a result of this collaborative model. In-
structional coaches can also assist with the implementation of response to intervention programs
for students with special needs (Desimone & Pak, 2017, p. 4). Particular supports and features
need to be in place in order for the instructional coach to improve teaching practice and student
learning. Desimone and Pak outline the following five strategies for effective coaching;
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 13 of 28
a. “content focus - activities are focused on subject matter content and how stu-
dents learn that content
b. active learning - there are opportunities for teachers to observe, receive feed-
back analyze student work, or make presentations
c. coherence - content, goals, and activities are consistent with the school curricu-
lum and goals, teacher knowledge and beliefs, needs of the students, school, district, and
state reforms and policies
d - sustained duration - PD activities are ongoing throughout the school year and
include 20 hours or more of contact time
e - collective participation - groups of teachers from the same grade, subject, or
school participate in PD activities together to build an interactive learning community”
(Desimone & Pak, 2017, p. 4-5).
Research was conducted in the Silicon Valley in 2000 on the effects of how a lesson
study, a collaborative teacher-led approach to learning from practice, was helping teachers’ prac-
tices (Lewis, Perry, Foster, Hurd & Fisher, 2011, p. 64). The teachers with the Silicon Valley
Mathematics Institution were following a cycle of lesson evaluations in a study cycle where a
small group of teachers worked together on a research lesson. “The coaches’ lesson study group
offered an opportunity for coaches to build knowledge beyond that routinely expected for all ele-
mentary teachers” (Lewis, et al, 2011, p. 67). This research again shows the value of an instruc-
tional coach working closely with a teacher on a lesson, teaching practices, anticipated student
learning and student questioning. The group of teachers working together allowed a collabora-
tive dialogue on the instruction, pedagogy and the level of learning for the students. As the
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 14 of 28
coaches visited the classrooms, they were given a first-hand opportunity on the progression of
the lesson delivery and the debrief following allowed more reflective practice to take place.
Strategies and Practices:
The first step that needs to take place when implementing an instructional coach is estab-
lishing the roles and responsibilities of the job. Everyone in the school needs to be aware of the
job description and role of their coach. “An instructional coach position was created to improve
classroom instruction and enhance student achievement. Roles: mentor to teachers, model to
teachers, instructional leader, data analyst, teacher liaison (teacher-administrator)” (Spaulding &
Smith, 2012, p. 7).
Instructional coaching is not effective and does not result in any improvement in student
achievement without support and key strategies for implementation. According to the research
conducted by the Gates Foundation in 2014, teachers expressed a strong preference for a coach-
ing program design in the areas of content expertise, provide specific actions to try in a class-
room, and a coach well trained at giving feedback and not evaluative (Desmond-Hellman &
Gates, 2014, p. 7). All of these qualities would appear to logically fit within an instructional
coaches’ job description, except the latter strategy. Contradictory to the Denver Public School’s
distributed leadership program discussed earlier, teachers may not be ready to view their instruc-
tional coach as the evaluator. It is the belief of this author that distributed leadership in the area
of coaching and evaluation for improvement would take a great deal of time, reflective practice
and more research to substantiate the distributive leadership model built within the instructional
coach’s responsibilities.
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 15 of 28
According to Knight, coaching needs to use several principles and components based on
a theoretical framework that has been proven (Knight, 2007). The principles and components are
aligned in a similar fashion that enhances the importance of each strategy.
Principles Components Description
Equality Teacher enrollment The coach initiates interview, builds rapport
Choice & voice Collaborative Planning Teacher and coach collaboratively develop a plan, build rubric to guide lessons.
Dialogue Model the lessons Coach delivers lesson, teacher observes, takes notes.
Reflection Teacher-directed post-conference
Immediately following discuss lesson, use data from rubric
Observing the lesson The pair reverses roles, teacher delivers the lesson using the data and coach observes teacher
Praxis Collaborative Data exploration
Discuss the data from coaches' observations
Reciprocity Continued support Coach provides continued support in development of lessons, pedagogical techniques, until BOTH parties feel recognized mastery of the practice
Effective Instructional Coaching Implementation (Knight, 2007)
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 16 of 28
The teacher enrolment portion of instructional coaching could involve a presentation
from the coach to the staff, outlining their job description, responsibilities, structure, and how to
access or schedule their expertise. In the experience of this author, this stage is truly important
and will set the stage for either a negative or positive reception from the teachers. The coaches’
knowledge of the content and relationship with the staff need to be established and open. The
coach is encouraged to ask teachers to volunteer, as Knight states, and emphasize the “opportuni-
ties of the professional development and clarify the partnership philosophy which underpins the
coaching” (Devine, et al, 2013, p. 1127).
After the enrolment of the teachers, the rest of the components and principles outlined by
Knight can effectively occur with support from the administrator. As the definition of an instruc-
tional coach has been stated; to improve classroom instructional practice and increase student
achievement, the collaboration, data analysis and co-planning must take place (Hanover Re-
search, 2015, p. 3). In order for the time needed for this collaboration, the administrator needs to
allow these meetings to occur. The administrator will need to ensure timetabling and other re-
sponsibilities of both the teacher and the coach align within the schedule.
An effective coach also needs to possess highly skilled facilitation and learning-focused
conversational skills (Hanover Research, 2015, p. 4). They need to be able to engage the teacher
in discussions that will revolve around the lessons observed, data analysis and the goals collabo-
ratively set together. Knight also adds that an instructional coach needs to understand the coach-
ing cycle for improvement, teaching practices, how to work with adult learners and how to
gather data and monitor progress toward learning goals (Knight, 2007).
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 17 of 28
The establishment of a leadership team comprised of the instructional leader, administra-
tor and teachers, as described earlier, can be a key strategy for school improvement. The instruc-
tional coach plays an important role on this team. This team can establish specific roles on ana-
lyzing school data and “disaggregation” of the data (Spaulding & Smith, 2012, p. 24). This fo-
cus on data allows the team to engage in student achievement and avoid derailing the process
with distractions. Spaulding & Smith suggest using the following steps; “analyze school data,
identify areas of instruction needed for improvement, conduct a review of the literature, deter-
mine evidence-based practices and develop a professional plan, work with teachers, re-examine
data, examine new data and reflect on practice” (Spaulding & Smith, 2012, p. 25). In the experi-
ence of this author, this data “disaggregation” is a very effective method of looking at data and
getting deep into the reasons for the data. For example, a school survey data can be used to look
at gender, ethnicity background, social economic status and Aboriginal identity in order to nar-
row the focus and discover what the goals of the school should include.
Instructional coaches also need to support their own professional learning. An effective
coach will require professional training in the multiple facets of the skills necessary. “Coaches
need to practice, learn communication skills, and have a deep understanding of the complexities
of working with adults” (Knight, 2007). Professional learning can also take the form of a men-
tor. “Mentors support coaches from many different specialities, trained in many different ways,
providing professional development and professional learning that is essential to their work”
(Medrich & Charner, 2017, p. 4 ). Coaches that work with a mentor will have opportunities to
access resources, research practices, and reflect on their own practice with other coaches
(Medrich & Charter, 2017, p. 5). Similar to the coaching model, coaches themselves will bene-
fit from discussing the roles and responsibilities with other coaches in order to improve.
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 18 of 28
Goal setting is a key element with the coach and teacher, but it is also important for a
global vision from the district’s perspective. Once a district has established an instructional
coaching program in its schools, it is imperative that the focus is on the goals and standards in an
unified way. “To position coaching as a districtwide effort, a school and district need to develop
a decision-making system that show commitment to a coaching program as a part of a shared
practice” (King, Neuman, Pelchat, Potochnik, Rao, & Thompson, 2014).
Once the goals are established for the instructional coaching program, the instructional
coach can work with a group of teachers on research-based practices. One strategy that has
proven to be effective, especially with resistant teachers, is classroom field-testing projects
(Spaulding & Smith, 2012, p. 90). An action-research framework will help an instructional
coach gather information, content knowledge, and use research design models, and also give the
teacher another adult in the room to help teachers with data on their chosen action-research
project (Spaulding & Smith, 2012, p. 92). The teachers are able to chose the action they feel is
needed based on their students’ needs, and the research-based practices are supported by the in-
structional coach.
Any new initiative in education needs ongoing monitoring and evaluation. Establishing a
coaching model in any school requires evaluating the program consistently. There is a great deal
at stake involved with teachers, coaches and students, therefore, there must be a value attached to
the efforts that are required. “Experts interviewed for this report make a variety of recommenda-
tions to support evaluation. First, Ann O’Doherty suggests schools and districts measure three
major types of data surrounding coaching: product - did you get the outcomes you hoped for?
process - how well did coaching serve each of the parties involved? inputs - what was invested in
the program? (e.g. frequency of meetings, content and quality of coaching, etc)” (Hanover Re-
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 19 of 28
search, 2015). The other obvious question here should be, was there an increase in student
achievement after the implication of an instructional coach?
Benefits and Pitfalls
There are many benefits of using a coach in a classroom environment. There is a great
deal of time required for an instructional leader to coach teachers. Despite time as a challenge,
along with the many duties and responsibilities that an administrator is responsible for everyday,
the benefits of an administrator taking the role as coach can be substantial. There is a rich learn-
ing environment for both the coach and the teacher (Huston & Weaver, 2007, p. 8). Reflecting
on the teaching practice is an important piece of growth and coaching allows for this deep level
of analysis (Huston & Weaver, 2007, p. 8). Western School Division in Morden, Manitoba, has
recently adopted a reflective practice in their supervision for growth policy. Partners in Practice
is a new initiative that gives teachers in Western School Division the opportunity to visit a col-
league within the Province, observe their teaching, participate in professional dialogue with the
teacher about their practice and then share their reflections and possible ideas for change with
their own administrator. This innovative approach follows a similar philosophy as a coaching
model discussed here, where reflection and dialogue are expected with results of increased
teacher knowledge and practices. “Coaching provides an opportunity to improve faculty peda-
gogical content knowledge” (Huston & Weaver, 2007, p. 10). Coaching allows teachers to par-
ticipate in safe conversations for experienced faculty by questioning assumptions, sharing prob-
lems, and addressing emerging issues generated by a changing classroom landscape (Huston &
Weaver, 2007, p. 17).
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 20 of 28
A study conducted in 2011 by the American Productivity and Quality Centre, analyzed
the impact of instructional coaches on teaching and learning. Five exemplary districts were stud-
ied from Texas, Arizona, Virginia, North Carolina, and Missouri. The findings showed im-
proved teacher retention with a decline in teacher attrition from 31% to 13%, overall district per-
formance gains of 16 points in reading, 12 points in math and 10 points on state exams, im-
proved graduation rates and improved campus collaboration between school teams and the dis-
trict offices (Hanover Research, 2015, p. 26). This data supports the benefits that have been out-
lined here and shows the impact instructional coaching can have on a school.
Some of the pitfalls that can occur with a coaching program are also evident. “Whether
voluntary or mandated, coaching can fail to reach resistant teachers” (King, et al, 2014, p. 5).
Despite a coach’s efforts on delivery and the support of an administrator, a resistant teacher will
opt out of this professional development opportunity. If the program was mandated, then the re-
sistant teacher may feel resentment and bring a negative tone to the program, diminishing the ef-
fects.
Even though an evaluation of a coaching program is suggested, this process could prove
to be difficult and demanding. “The lack of documented examples of coaching allows districts to
construct their own process and content, but these new models must then be tracked in order to
share the lessons learned” (King, et al, 2014, p. 6). Many other variables contribute to the lack
of evaluation or difficulty with sustaining the personnel due to staff changes. Senior administra-
tion may put off the important work of the data gathering, begin other initiatives, and assume
there has been progress due to an increased moral, without the supporting data to substantiate the
claim.
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 21 of 28
“Coaching must move beyond a “universal best practices” approach to instruction in or-
der to effectively deal with complex equity issues such as language diversity and special needs”
(King, et al, 2014, p. 6). Content coaches must remember to get to know all of the students in a
class and recognize any language needs instead of teaching the teacher global strategies that may
not be effective for all the learners. The relationship and collaboration between the teacher and
coach must be open and close enough with time built in for the coach to discuss the student
needs of the class.
Conclusion
Instructional coaching is an initiative that involves highly trained teachers that work with
other teachers to improve student achievement. According to the research, instructional coach-
ing has been proven to be an effective method of professional development for teachers with rev-
olutionary change to teachers’ practices. This author has experienced coaching first hand, and
believes that with strong administrative support, a strong candidate, and time for growth, coach-
ing will positively affect not only the teacher’s instruction but also high rates of learning for stu-
dents.
The University of Florida study suggests several strategic pillars in order to create im-
pactful coaches (The University of Florida, 2016, p. 8). There must be a unified vision and com-
mitment from all of the stakeholders of a school. In order for school reform to take place, every-
body needs to not only understand the movement, but also agree and support the initiative en-
tirely. The goals need to be visibly set and confirmed with all the teachers. “The most signifi-
cant movement is that as a district, we are now approaching a critical mass of educators who
have meaningful discussions around classroom practice based data. Those important conver-
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 22 of 28
sions are creating more reflective teachers and impacting student learning” (Univeristy of Flor-
ida, 2016, p. 8).
As mentioned earlier, hiring practices of the coach are another key pillar to success (Uni-
versity of Florida, 2016, p. 8). It is not effective to only hire experienced teachers without con-
sidering the content knowledge, pedagogical expertise, conversational skills, and data analysis
abilities. An instructional coach requires a high level of expertise that can be developed over
time with the proper training and reflective learning. Administrators that are trained in what
characteristics to look for in a quality coach, that will be helpful with sustaining and supporting
the personnel that becomes an instructional coach.
Sharing the responsibilities with all parties involved will help alleviate the tremendous re-
sponsibilities of implementing an instructional coaching program. The administrator must share
this responsibility in the form of not only support but also shared conversations on the develop-
ment and improvements of the teachers. The shared conversation can take place within the
school leadership team that involves the instructional coach, teachers and the administrator. The
administrator should support and dedicate time allotments that allow teachers and coaches to
meet regularly. A coach’s role must become part of the daily work within the school culture and
become a part of the daily work that is achieved. Although some research does not support
coaches as evaluators, and the current teacher unions in Manitoba would likely not support this
form of evaluation, it is the belief of this author that following the Denver model of distributed
leadership has merit. More research is required in the area of content coach evaluators.
The development and support of coaches requires the commitment of time, money and at-
tention on an ongoing basis. Most coaches do not receive the necessary training that is required
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 23 of 28
to be highly effective. They need regular meetings, mentors and involvement with their adminis-
trator and other coaches. The job description needs to be clearly outlined for the coach and the
teachers. They need time to work with teachers and they need support with resistant teachers.
The structure of the program needs to be clearly outlined with a concentration on groups of
teachers not just individual teachers that are coached. The coach should work with a leadership
team of teachers that have the opportunity to collaborate together, gather data and evidence of
their practice and time given to go through a cycle of change. This collaboration and reflective
dialogue is the most important and vital component of an effective instructional coaching pro-
gram. Data and evidence should drive the coach’s program and goals. Using data and analyzing
the results keeps the focus on student learning and removes any personal interferences or misun-
derstandings of the purpose.
The final suggestion for effective implementation of an instructional coach is compensa-
tion and sustainability (University of Florida, 2016, p. 18). Professional learning costs money
and the budget does not always allow for the spending of professional development funds. In or-
der for the sustainability of instructional coaching and the high impact on teachers and students,
districts and divisions will need to allocate the necessary monetary support to achieve these
goals. There may be a high cost front-loading the program, but the results will pay dividends in
the future. “Experience and emergent studies have illustrated that coaching roles can be a pow-
erful mechanism to achieve an array of goals: meaningful career paths to retain top performers,
job-embedded professional learning that creates a cycle of continuous improvement in schools,
and instructional practice that raises outcomes for students” (University of Florida, 2016, p. 21).
In conclusion, schools do not need to wait for the support or further research in the area
of implementing an instructional coaching model. Teachers can simply start the dialogue with a
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 24 of 28
fellow teacher on instructional strategies, data, and research practices. A lesson study evaluation
can take place within a professional learning community at any time, in any school. This move-
ment could result in an instructional coaching initiative. As instructional coaches work with
groups of teachers, the collaborative dialogue contributes to higher skill sets and therefore will
improve and contribute to the teacher capacity of the school. The results for teachers will be evi-
dent as their instructional practices will increase in proficiency, they will participate in highly re-
flective dialogue about their lessons, and the collaboration with others will all contribute to
higher achievements with students.
References
Bierly, C., Doyle, B., & Smith, A. (2016). Transforming schools: How distributed leadership
can
create more high-performing schools. Bain & Company: Boston.
Retrieved from: http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/transforming-schools.aspx
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 25 of 28
Campbell, P. F., Malkus N. N. (2011). The Impact of Elementary Mathematics Coaches on
Student Achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 111, 3, 430-454.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/657654
Desimone, L.M., & Pak K. (2017) Instructional Coaching as High-Quality Professional
Development. Theory Into Practice, 56:1, 3-12, doi: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947
Desmond-Hellman, S. & Gates, W. (2014). Teachers know best: Teachers’ views on profes-
sional
development. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from:
http://k12education.gatesfoundation.org/resource/teachers-know-best-teachers-views-on-
professional-development/
Devine, M., Houssemand, C. and Meyers, R. (2013). Instructional Coaching for Teachers: A
Strategy to Implement New Practices in the Classrooms. Procedia - Social and
Behavioural Sciences, 93, 1126-1130.
Fullan, M., & Knight, J. (2011). Coaches as System Leaders. Educational Leadership,
69(2), 50-53. Retrieved from EBSCO Publishing database.
Hanover Research (2015). Best practices in instructional coaching: Prepared for Iowa Area
Education Agencies. Retrieved from: https://www.educateiowa.gov/sites/files/
ed/documents/Best%20Practices%20in%20Instructional%20Coaching%20-%20Iowa
%20Area%20Education%20Agencies.pdf
Huff, J., Preston, C. & Goldring, E. (2013). Implementation of a Coaching Program for School
Principals: Evaluating Coaches’ Strategies and the Results. Educational Man-
agreement Administration & Leadership. Sage Pub., UK., 41(4), 504–526.
doi: 10.1177/1741143213485467
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 26 of 28
Huston, T., Weaver, C.L. (2007). Peer Coaching: Professional Development for Experienced
Faculty. Vol. 33. pages 5-20. DOI 10.1007/s10755-007-9061-9.
King, D., Neuman, M., Pelchat, J., Potochnik, T., Rao, S., & Thompson, J. (2014). Instructional
coaching: Professional development strategies that improve instruction. Annenberg
Institute for School Reform. Brown University: RI. Retrieved from:
http://www.annenberginstitute.org/sites/default/files/product/270/files/Instructional-
Coaching.pdf
Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Koh, S. & Neuman, S.B. (2006). Exemplary elements of coaching: Ann Arbor MI: University of
Michigan Research Program on Ready to Read.
Kretlow, A.G., & Bartholomew, C.C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of
evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education,
33, 4, 279-299. doi: 10.1177/0888406410371643 http://tese.sagepub.com.
Lewis, C., Perry, R., Foster, D., Hurd, J., & Fisher, L. (2011). Lesson Study: Beyond Coaching.
Educational Leadership. ASCD.
Marsh, J.A., McCombs, J.S. & Martorell, F. (2012). Reading coach quality: Findings from
Florida Middle Schools. Literacy Research and Instruction, 51:1, 1-26. Retrieved
from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2010.518662
Marshall, K. (2013). Rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation. San Francisco, CA: John
Wiley.
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 27 of 28
Mangin, M.M. & Dunsmore, K. (2014). How the framing of instructional coaching as a lever
for systemic or individual reform influences the enactment of coaching. Educa-
tional
Administration Quarterly, 51(2), 179-213. doi: 10.1177/0013161X14522814
eaq.sagepub.com.
Medrich, E.A., Fitzgerald, R., Skomsvold, P. (2013). Instructional coaching and student
outcomes: Findings form a three year pilot study. MPR Associates, Inc.: Pennsylvania
Department of Education. Retrieved from:
http://piic.pacoaching.org/images/PIICdocuments/Research_and_Eval/piic_report_ab-
stract.pdf
Medrich, E. & Charner, I. (2017). Educator-centered instructional coaching practices that
work: Lessons from PIIC research. FHI 360 National Institute for Work and Learning:
Pennsylvania Institute for Instructional Coaching. Retrieved from: http://instituteforin-
structionalcoaching.org/attachments/article/301/LegacyReport.pdf
Olthoff, R.J. (1992). Principal as Instructional Coach Providing Quality Education. Sage Pub.
NASSP, 76(546), 6-12. doi: 10.1177/019263659207654203.
Paramore, T. (2007). Coaching conversations for beginners. Journal of Language and Literacy
Education, 3(1).
Poglinco, S.M. & Bach, A.J. (2004). The heart of the matter: Coaching as a vehicle for
professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(5), 398-400.
Spaulding, D. and Smith, G. (2012). Instructional coaches and the instructional leadership team
a guide for school-building improvement. California: Corwin.
Sun, M., Penuel, W.R., Frank, K.A., Gallagher, H.A., & Youngs, P. (2013). Shaping
Instructional Coaching to Improve Student Achievement 28 of 28
professional development to promote the diffusion of instructional expertise among
teachers. Education Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 35(3), 344-369.
doi: 10.3102/0162373713482763 Retrieved from:
http://journals.sagepub.com.berlioz.brandonu.ca/doi/pdf/10.3102/0162373713482763
Toll, C. A. (2004). Separating coaching from supervising. North Central Regional Laboratory.
Naperville, IL: 5-7.
The University of Florida Lastinger Center for Learning, Learning Forward, & Public Impact.
(2016). Coaching for impact: Six pillars to create coaching roles that achieve
their
potential to improve teaching and learning. Gainesville: University of Florida Lastinger
Center; Oxford, OH: Learning Forward; and Chapel Hill, NC: Public Impact. Re-
trieved from: https://learningforward.org/docs/default-source/pdf/coaching-for-
impact.pdf
Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., Orphanos, S. (2009).
Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development
in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX. National Staff Development Coun-
cil.
Retrieved from:
https://learningforward.org/docs/pdf/nsdcstudytechnicalreport2009.pdf?sfvrsn=0