doc.: ieee 802.11-09/0953r1 submission november 2009 adrian stephens, intel corporationslide 1...
TRANSCRIPT
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
802.11 TGmb Editor Report - Nov 2009
Date: 2009-11-03
Name Company Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel
Corporation [email protected]
Authors:
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Abstract
• This document summarises editorial activities on the TGmb Draft since the last meeting
• Status of Draft
• Status of comments from LB149
• Style
• E-Motions
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 3
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
November 2009
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
REVmb Draft Numbering History (>D1)
• D1.0, 2009-05 – Balloted as LB149
• D1.01, 2009-07 – speculative resolution of editorials
• D1.02, 2009-08 – speculative resolution of minor technical comments
• D1.03, 2009-08 – editing of approved resolutions
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Process for D1.04-D1.06
• D1.04 contains speculative editing of ~200 non-editorial comment resolutions approved in Sept 2009
• D1.04 was reviewed and ~xxx defects were reported
• D1.05 was prepared containing a roll-up of STD 802.11w-2009
• D1.05 was reviewed and ~xxx defects were reported
• D1.06 was prepared containing bugfixes for the D1.04 and D1.05 defects.
• Thankyou to the reviewers:
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 6
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
LB149 Documents
• REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website)– Draft P802.11REVmb_D1.06.pdf
• + Incremental redlines D1.04->D1.05 etc
• Composite comments (all ad-hocs)– 11-09-0706-02-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-comments.xls
• Comments assigned to / held by editor– For: resolution, editing or other action
– 11-09-0956-00-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-editor-comments.xls
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
WG Ballot 149 Comments
Count Part of No VoteType of Comment N Y Grand Total
E 224 15 239T 313 178 491
Grand Total 537 193 730
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 8
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Status by ad-hoc – 2009-11-03 (summary)O
wni
ng A
d-ho
c
Una
ssig
ned
Ass
igne
d
Res
olve
d
Rea
dy fo
r M
otio
n
App
rove
d
Dup
licat
e
Edi
toria
l App
rove
d
Gra
nd T
otal
ARCHITECTURE 80 11 57 148EDITOR 219 7 233 459
GEN 41 7 48MAC 11 5 31 13 4 64
SECURITY 2 9 11Grand Total 132 12 44 79 219 11 233 730
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 9
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
E-Motions
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 10
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
“Go to ballot” Motion
• Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D1.0,
• Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 2.0 incorporating these resolutions and,
• Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 11
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Sept 2009
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 12
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Process for D1.01-D1.03
• D1.01 contains speculative editing of editorial comment resolutions (~770 pages modified)
• D1.01 was reviewed (~100 defects reported)
• D1.02 contains speculative editing of minor technical comment resolutions, and resolution of the D1.01 defects (~410 pages modifed)
• D1.02 was reviewed (~20 defects reported)
• D1.03 contains editing of comment resolutions approved in July 2009, plus resolution of the D1.02 defects (~12 pages modified)
• D1.03 was reviewed and no defects were reported
• Thankyou to the reviewers: Bill, Eldad, Gary, Jon, Kaberi, Mark, Matthew, Michael, Peter, Stephen and Sudheer
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 13
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
LB149 Documents
• REVmb DRAFT (members’ area of 802.11 website)– Draft P802.11REVmb_D1.03.pdf + D1.02, D1.01, D1.0
– + Incremental redlines D1.02->D1.03 etc
• Composite comments (all ad-hocs)– 11-09-0706-02-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-comments.xls
• Comments assigned to / held by editor– For: resolution, editing or other action
– 11-09-0956-00-000m-revmb-wg-ballot-editor-comments.xls
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 14
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
WG Ballot 149 Comments
Count Part of No VoteType of Comment N Y Grand Total
E 224 15 239T 313 178 491
Grand Total 537 193 730
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 15
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Status by ad-hoc – 2009-09-01 (summary)
Count state
Ow
nin
g A
d-h
oc
Un
ass
ign
ed
As
sig
ne
d
Re
so
lve
d
Ap
pro
ve
d
Du
plic
ate
Ed
ito
ria
l Re
so
lve
d
Gra
nd
To
tal
ARCHITECTURE 80 68 148EDITOR 57 13 7 228 305
GEN 93 7 1 101MAC 96 3 20 5 124
SECURITY 4 48 52Grand Total 273 10 194 13 12 228 730
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 16
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Style – “Puttin’ on the Ritz” **
• Decisions on global edits made by TGmb are effectively creating a “TGmb style”
• Adrian and Bill are creating a document to describe this style– Based on decisions made by TGmb on editorial comments
• This style does not apply to amendments to STD-2007, but will apply to amendments to STD-20xx.
• Learnings from early TGn publication editing: publication editor will ensure stylistic consistency with STD-2007
• Some unknowns: will publication editor of STD-20xx reverse some of these stylistic decisions?– Are we wasting our time worrying about this now?– Are we creating work for publication editor?
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puttin'_on_the_Ritz
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 17
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Compiling the MIB
• Hide any editorial tags
• Save contents of Annex D and Annex Q as text
• Move contents of Annex Q just before “END” statement of Annex D.
• Comment out headings and Editorial Notes
• Run through MIB Browser– If any errors fix them up till the file compiles while making
matching changes in the Annex D / Annex Q sources.
– Freeware MIB browsers are available that can perform this compilation.
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 18
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
E-Motions
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 19
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Editorial Motion 1
• Approve resolutions of P802.11REVmb WG ballot 149 comments– in document 11-09-0956r0
– on the “Editorials” tab
• Marshall/Stephens
• Motion # 6: 9,0,1Part of No Vote A D P U Grand Total
N 118 21 76 1 216Y 5 3 2 10
Grand Total 123 24 78 1 226
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 20
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Editorial Motion 2
• Approve resolutions of P802.11REVmb WG ballot 149 comments– in document 11-09-0956r0
– on the “Minor Technical” tab
• Worstell/Montemurro
• Motion # 7: 6,0,4Part of No Vote A D P S U Grand Total
N 19 2 19 40Y 5 2 4 11
Grand Total 19 2 24 2 4 51
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 21
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Editorial Motion 3
• Approve resolutions of P802.11REVmb WG ballot 149 comments– in document 11-09-0956r1
– on the “MIB” tab
• Montemurro/Marshall
• Motion # 8
• Withdrawn
• One comment (P), “compile the MIB”, see submission 11-09/0921r1
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 22
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
Editorial Motion 4
• Approve resolutions of P802.11REVmb WG ballot 149 comments– in document 11-09-0956r0
– on the “Annex C” tab
• Moved: Stephens / Myles
• Motion # 9: 5,4,2
• Proposed resolutions replace Annex C by a placeholder.Part of No Vote P Grand Total
N 6 6Y 1 1
Grand Total 7 7
November 2009
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 23
doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0953r1
Submission
“Go to ballot” Motion
• Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D1.0,
• Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 2.0 incorporating these resolutions and,
• Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”