doc.: ieee 802.11-10/0130r0 submission january 2010 yung-szu tu, et al., ralink tech.slide 1...

34
January 2010 Yung- Szu T u, et Slide 1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 N am e C om pany A ddress Phone em ail Y ung-Szu Tu [email protected] Y en-Chin Liao [email protected] Cheng-H suan W u 5F., N o.36, Taiyuan St., JhubeiCity, H sinchu County 302, Taiw an +886-3-560-0868 cs_wu@ ralinktech.com.tw PeterLoc +1-408-807-0868 [email protected] Tom Pare [email protected] K iran Uln Ralink Technology 20833 StevensCreek Blvd, Suite 200., Cupertino CA 95014 +1-408-725-8070 [email protected] Leonardo Lanante [email protected] Y uheiN agao [email protected] W ahyulA m ien Syafei K yushu Institute ofTechnology K aw azu 680-4, Iizuka, JA PAN +81-948-29-7692 [email protected] H iroshiO chi [email protected] ThetH tun K hine R adrix C orp. K aw azu 680-4, Iizuka, JA PAN +81-948-29-7692 [email protected] Shin Chon Park K orea A dvanced Institute of Science and Technology 2201 Creation H all, K A IST-ICC, 103-6, Munji-Dong, Y useong-G u, KO REA +82-42-350-6921 [email protected] Authors:

Upload: cory-lawrence

Post on 08-Jan-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 3 PPDU Format

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 1

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Proposed TGac Preamble

Date: 2010-01-20

Name Company Address Phone email Yung-Szu Tu [email protected]

Yen-Chin Liao [email protected]

Cheng-Hsuan Wu

5F., No.36, Taiyuan St., Jhubei City, Hsinchu County 302, Taiwan

+886-3-560-0868

[email protected]

Peter Loc +1-408- 807-0868 [email protected]

Tom Pare [email protected]

Kiran Uln

Ralink Technology 20833 Stevens Creek

Blvd, Suite 200., Cupertino CA 95014

+1-408-725-8070 [email protected]

Leonardo Lanante [email protected]

Yuhei Nagao [email protected]

Wahyul Amien Syafei

Kyushu Institute of Technology

Kawazu 680-4, Iizuka, JAPAN

+81-948-29-7692

[email protected]

Hiroshi Ochi [email protected]

Thet Htun Khine Radrix Corp. Kawazu 680-4, Iizuka, JAPAN

+81-948-29-7692 [email protected]

Shin Chon Park Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

2201 Creation Hall, KAIST-ICC, 103-6, Munji-Dong, Yuseong-Gu, KOREA

+82-42-350-6921

[email protected]

Authors:

Page 2: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Outline

• PPDU format• VHT-SIG• Legacy Rx state machine for VHT-SIG• VHT-LTF

– 2 options

• Conclusion and future work

Page 3: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

PPDU Format

Page 4: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 4

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

VHT PPDU Format Design Considerations

• Immediate (no symbol delay) detection• Reliable• Backward compatibility with 11a/n• Low PAPR

Page 5: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 5

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Possible VHT PPDU Formats

• All packet types present in MM-VHT network– Support for VHT-GF is optional

HT-SIG2HT-SIG1L-SIG

DATA2DATA1L-SIG

VHT-SIGn VHT-STF VHT-LTFVHT-SIG1L-SIG

11aLegacy

11nMM

11acMM

VHT-DATA1

HT-STF HT-LTF HT-DATA1

HT-SIG2HT-SIG111nGF HT-LTF HT-DATA1

11a Legacy Packet

VHT-SIGn VHT-LTFVHT-SIG111acGF

VHT-DATA1

11n Packet Types

11ac Packet Types

L-LTFL-STF

L-LTFL-STF

HT-LTF1HT-GF-STF

L-LTFL-STF

VHT-LTF1VHT-GF-STF

Page 6: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 6

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Phase Rotation

• 09/1174r0 [2] mentioned phase rotation over 4 sub-bands is required for low PAPR

• Our simulation result on phase rotation agrees with 09/0847r1 [3] by Leonardo et al., i.e. 1 j 1 -j

• We also found other sets of rotation that yield low PAPR

Page 7: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 7

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

VHT-SIG

Page 8: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 8

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

VHT Signal Field

• Challenges for VHT-SIG design• Immediate and Reliable detection on first symbol after L-SIG

– Minimize false detection• Backward compatibility

– With 11a/n• Efficiency

– Support enhanced features of TGac with no unnecessary fields

Page 9: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 9

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Previously Proposed VHT Preamble Format

• Proposed Signaling scheme allows MM/GF structure identical to 11n• Alternating subcarriers get 90-degree shift

– “Orthogonal shift” compared to 0-degree and 90-degree

HT-SIG2HT-SIG1L-SIG

DATA2DATA1L-SIG11aLegacy

11nMM HT-STF HT-LTF HT-DATA1

VHT-SIGn VHT-STF VHT-LTFVHT-SIG1L-SIGVHTMM

VHT-DATA1

90 degreerotation

90 degreeAlternate

subcarriers

Page 10: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 10

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

11n HT-SIG Field detection using 90 degree BPSK

• 90 degree detector– Operate on 1st symbol following L-SIG– Detection:

• Measure FEQ output • Compare I vs Q energy levels: High Q energy HT packet• Legacy data symbols: low Q, or equal I and Q components

-1 +1

L-SIG

-j

+j

HT-SIG

Q

DATA(QPSK e.g.)

I

Q

I

Q

I

Page 11: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 11

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Previously Proposed VHT-SIG modified 90 degree BPSK

• Alternate 0/90 degree BPSK symbols on odd/even subcarriers

• Will not be detected as 11n HT-SIG field

-1 +1

VHT-SIG

-j

+jQ

I

Q

I

OddSC’s

EvenSC’s

Page 12: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 12

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Previously Proposed VHT-SIG MM Detection Scheme

xHT-SIGn xHT STF xHT-LTFxHT-SIG1L-SIG xHT-DATA1

2 2

1

Nsc

i ii

I Q

2 2 2 2

, ,

Nsc Nsc

i i k ki even k odd

I Q I Q

11n Detection

11ac Detection

nS

acS

Metric Data Symbol 11a L-SIG 11n HT-SIG 11ac VHT-SIG

11n 0 S -S 0

11ac 0 0 0 -S

Page 13: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 13

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Newly Proposed VHT-SIG with +45/+135 degree BPSK

• Rotate VHT BPSK symbols +45 degrees– Alternate +45/-45 (+135) degree BPSK symbols on odd/even

subcarriers– Will not be detected as 11n HT-SIG field

• Even just a few subcarriers would detect equal I/Q energy

VHT-SIG

(1-j)

(-1+j)Q

I

Q

I

OddSC’s

EvenSC’s

(1+j)

(-1-j)

45.0°

45.0°

Page 14: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Newly Proposed VHT-SIG MM Detection with Rotation

xHT-SIGn xHT STF xHT-LTFxHT-SIG1L-SIG xHT-DATA1

2 2

1

Nsc

i ii

I Q

2 2 2 2

, ,

Nsc Nsc

i i k ki even k odd

I Q I Q

11n Detection

VHT Detection

nS

acS-45-deg rotation

4je

• Detection metrics unchanged• More robust 11n spoofing

• All subcarriers appear as QPSK to 11n detector (i.e., data symbol)• VHT detection on de-rotated symbols

– Recovers original orthogonal 90-degree BPSK shift

Page 15: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 15

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Orthogonal shift provides better backward compatibility

• Both VHT-SIG1, 2 appear as QPSK data to 11n detector– All subcarriers contain both I/Q energy– Both VHT-SIG fields appear as data symbols under 11n detection

• Delayed-90 shift could result in “false positive” 11n detection – Certain 11n implementations could trigger off either HT-SIG field

to declare 11n packet• More efficient SIG field design

– Open possibility to QPSK VHT-SIG2– No need for VHT-SIG3– Or, pack twice as much VHT descriptor info. by employing higher-

order Modulation and Code Rate

Page 16: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 16

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Detection Timeline with and without Rotation of VHT-SIG1

• With VHT-SIG1 rotation, 11ac devices can recognize 11ac packets at FEQ output

immediately after VHT-SIG1

VHT-SIG3 VHT-STF VHT-LTFVHT-SIG1L-SIG11acMM

VHT-DATA1L-LTFL-STF

No rotation of

VHT-SIG1

VHT-SIG2

with rotation of

VHT-SIG1

11ac detectedStart VHT processing

11ac detectedStart VHT processing

Page 17: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 17

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Straightforward Extension to Greenfield

• Allows highly efficient all-GF operation– Eventual phase-out of 11a devices: all 11n/ac network

HT-SIG2HT-SIG1L-SIG11nMM HT-STF HT-LTF HT-

DATA1

HT-SIG2HT-SIG111nGF HT-STF HT-LTF HT-

DATA1

VHT-SIGn VHT-STF VHT-LTFVHT-SIG1NewVHTGF

VHT-DATA1

Orthogonal Shift0-degree shift 90-degree shiftSHIFT DEFINITIIONS

Page 18: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 18

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Rx State Machine

Page 19: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 19

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

11a PLCP Rx State Machine

Page 20: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 20

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

11n PLCP Rx State Machine

Page 21: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 21

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Legacy Rx State Machine

• 11a devices can recognize L-SIG but not the following VHT-SIG, so it will wait LENGTH indicated in L-SIG

• 11n devices cannot recognize VHT-SIG, so three ways at “RX HT-SIG” are all possible1. Carrier lost2. HT-SIG, but CRC will fail3. Claimed as 11a/g, but can’t be decoded wait LENGTH– 1 and 2 will return to IDLE state when the PPDU is over, just as

invalid and corrupted 11n PPDU

All legacy devices are not affected

Page 22: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 22

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Summary

• Use “orthogonal shift” to signal new VHT packet format– Take advantage of OFDM property to expand signaling space– More robust detection VHT-SIG1,2 appear as QPSK to 11n detector

• More efficient SIG field design– Open possibility to QPSK VHT-SIG2

• No need for VHT-SIG3 • Additional user data

• GF compatibility– Extends gracefully to VHT-GF operation

Page 23: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 23

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

VHT-LTF

Page 24: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 24

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Channel Estimation by P Matrix

28:28

28:28

28:28

28:28

Tx1= * 1 1 1 1

Tx2= * 1 1 1 1

Tx3= * 1 1 1 1

Tx4= * 1 1 1 1

HTLTF

HTLTF

HTLTF

HTLTF

CSD Q IFFT

Page 25: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 25

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Generation of the New P matrixfor More Tx Antenna

• Requirement of generating P– P must be a unitary matrix ( )– The element of P must be +1 or -1

• Ensures the Tx and Rx power the same as payload. – The 2x2 P must be a sub-matrix of 3x3 P

1 TP P

Page 26: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 26

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Compatible with 11n P Matrix• The size of the P matrix must be even.• There exists no 6x6 P matrix which is also compatible with the 11n P

matrix(4x4)

1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1-1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 -1

88

87

86

85

44

43

22

11

NDLTFNSTS

Page 27: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 27

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

MIMO Channel Estimation by FDM LTF (1)

LTF1

LTF2

LTF6

IFFT

Page 28: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 28

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

MIMO Channel Estimation by FDM LTF (2)

LTF1 LTF2 LTF3 LTF4 LTF5 LTF6 Data

LTF2 LTF3 LTF4 LTF5 LTF6 LTF1 Data

LTF3 LTF4 LTF5 LTF6 LTF1 LTF2 Data

LTF4 LTF5 LTF6 LTF1 LTF2 LTF3 Data

LTF5 LTF6 LTF1 LTF2 LTF3 LTF4 Data

LTF6 LTF1 LTF2 LTF3 LTF4 LTF5 Data

Tx1

Tx6

Tx2

Tx3

Tx4

Tx5

Page 29: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 29

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Mean Square Error for 6x6

• Channel B • Channel D

Page 30: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 30

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Mean Square Error for 6x8

• Channel B • Channel D

Page 31: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 31

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Mean Square Error for 8x8

• Channel B • Channel D

Page 32: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 32

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Comparison

• FDM is more efficiency– For FDM, No. of symbols = No. of streams– For P matrix, No. of symbols = 8 for 5~7 streams– At the expense of worse MSE

• P matrix method is compatible with 11n and has lower MSE

Page 33: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 33

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

Conclusion and Future Work

• VHT-SIG is refined with extra 45 degree rotation, compared with 09/1258r0

• VHT-SIG is backward compatible with legacy Rx state machine

• Two options of VHT-LTF are proposed• Future work:

– Simulation of VHT-SIG– More PHY designs

Page 34: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: 2010-01-20 Authors:

January 2010

Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Slide 34

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0

Submission

References

• [1] Yug-Szu Tu, et. al., Proposal for TGac VHT Format , IEEE 802.11-09/1258r0, Nov. 19, 2009

• [2] Hongyuan Zhang , et. al., 802.11ac Preamble, IEEE 802.11-10/0070r0, Jan. 19, 2010

• [3] Leonardo Lanante , et. al., IEEE802.11ac Preamble with Legacy 802.11a/n Backward Compatibility, IEEE 802.11-09/0847r1, Nov. 16, 2009