documenting changes in moth life- cycles and abundance caused by urban warming and pollution trung...
TRANSCRIPT
Documenting Changes in Moth Documenting Changes in Moth Life-Cycles and Abundance Life-Cycles and Abundance
Caused by Urban Warming and Caused by Urban Warming and PollutionPollution
Trung Quach, Yen Duong, Vy TranTrung Quach, Yen Duong, Vy Tran
What is DiscoverLife?
• Ecology research project run by Dr. John Pickering, University of Georgia.
• Provides tools for documenting (photographs) and identifying (interactive guides) insects.
• Uses a network of sites to model the potential impacts of climate change and actual impacts of pollution.
Where and Why?• Atlanta and Athens have the same basic
climate and habitats.– Atlanta has more pollution.– Atlanta is (artificially) warmer at night.
2010 Monthly average daily high and low temperatures for major Georgia cities
City Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Athens 51/33 56/35 65/42 73/49 80/58 87/65 90/69 88/68 82/63 73/51 63/42 54/35
Atlanta 52/34 57/36 65/44 73/50 80/60 86/67 89/71 88/70 82/64 73/53 63/44 55/36
Heat Islands Model Global Warming
• Major cities have artificially hotter night-time temperatures. (Pavement holds heat longer.)
• Changes in biodiversity in these Heat Islands can predict future changes in biodiversity for the whole region due to global warming.
• “Natural” Experiment
What are we comparing?• Total number of species and number of each
species seen
• Representation of major categories, such as Lichen Moths– Lichen moths feed off of lichens ascaterpillars.– Lichens are sensitive to pollution.
Lichen Moth
Overall Moth Data• Preliminary data available to compare Atlanta to Athens.
• Table 1 & 2 shows the quality of the data. Pay attention to the following:– Number of total photos taken (including moth, light
source, phone pictures)– Number of moths that are identified to the species
level– Number of “Phone” pictures (nights of effort)
Quality of DataYear
Monthphoto
sidentified to
speciesPhon
e
2013 01 66 15 19
2013 02 106 6 23
2013 03 179 54 31
2013 04 159 53 24
2013 05 264 114 28
2013 06 203 56 21
2013 07 121 46 15
2013 08 212 81 18
2013 09 207 68 22
2013 10 435 62 38
2013 11 121 3 14
2013 12 79 4 10
2014 01 102 8 18
2014 02 92 29 9TOTALS 2,346 599 290
AtlantaYear
Monthphoto
sidentified to
speciesPhon
e2013 01 1,839 1,564 31
2013 02 891 693 28
2013 03 1,559 1,161 34
2013 04 3,545 2,563 41
2013 05 5,391 3,705 33
2013 06 4,727 3,419 39
2013 07 4,615 3,103 35
2013 08 5,053 3,920 37
2013 09 4,002 2,888 38
2013 10 1,902 963 31
2013 11 964 272 30
2013 12 479 178 31
2014 01 309 130 35
2014 02 441 251 20TOTALS 35,717 24,810 463
Athens
Species Data
• Atlanta has a lower abundance of moths.- Additionally, the species seen in Atlanta should be among the common moths of Athens.
• Table 2 shows the 30 most common species in both Athens and Atlanta.
Top 30 Species Athens vs. AtlantaAthens most common
mothsNumber of photos (Athens)
Number of photos (Atlanta)
Ranking in Athens
Ranking in Atlanta
Phigalia denticulata 3,738 20 1 18Hypoprepia fucosa 2,729 0 2 999
Hypagyrtis unipunctata 2,262 4 3 83Melanolophia signataria 1,889 9 4 31
Cissusa spadix 1,692 1 5 175Microcrambus elegans 1,549 33 6 7Eupithecia miserulata 1,458 22 7 15
Phigalia strigataria 1,451 0 8 999Dolichomia olinalis 1,302 50 9 4
Sciota uvinella 1,203 0 10 999Ectropis crepuscularia 1,157 0 11 999
Phoberia atomaris 1,036 0 12 999Iridopsis defectaria 1,017 3 13 100Clemensia albata 987 0 14 999
Alsophila pometaria 934 12 15 33Marimatha nigrofimbria 880 17 16 24
Spilosoma congrua 865 0 17 999Lochmaeus bilineata 850 0 18 999
Hypena scabra 842 73 19 1Idia rotundalis 728 0 20 999
Acrolophus popeanella 723 10 21 39Eutrapela clemataria 718 6 22 60
Nadata gibbosa 701 1 23 211Epimecis hortaria 660 15 24 28
Glenoides texanaria 615 0 25 999Baileya ophthalmica 585 0 26 999
Costaconvexa centrostrigaria
58150
279
Nigetia formosalis 564 0 28 999Cisthene packardii 556 0 29 999Paleacrita vernata 532 0 30 999
Top 30 Species Atlanta vs. AthensAtlanta most common
mothsNumber of photos (Atlanta)
Number of photos (Athens)
Ranking in Atlanta
Ranking in Athens
Hypena scabra 73 842 1 19Fissicrambus mutabilis 66 86 2 222Blastobasis glandulella 57 237 3 89
Dolichomia olinalis 50 1,302 4 9Udea rubigalis 36 380 5 48
Clepsis peritana 35 133 6 143Microcrambus elegans 33 1,549 7 6
Galgula partita 31 257 8 81Melanolophia signataria 31 1,889 9 4
Costaconvexa centrostrigaria 30 581 10 27
Acleris semipurpurana 29 103 11 184Glyphidocera juniperella 27 323 12 59
Idia aemula 26 279 13 74Archips argyrospila 22 70 14 258
Eupithecia miserulata 22 1,458 15 7Parapediasia teterrella 21 141 16 134
Diatraea lisetta 20 210 17 99Phigalia denticulata 20 3749 18 1
Pleuroprucha insulsaria 20 261 19 78Atteva aurea 19 343 20 55
Celypha cespitana 19 2 21 997Herpetogramma aeglealis 18 16 22 575
Platynota idaeusalis 18 158 23 118Marimatha nigrofimbria 17 880 24 16
Palthis asopialis 17 300 25 65Argyrotaenia velutinana 16 79 26 233
Tetanolita floridana 16 70 27 259Epimecis hortaria 15 660 28 24Scoparia basalis 15 433 29 40
Tetanolita mynesalis 15 102 30 186
Atlanta most commonAthens ratio (moth
pics/phone)Atlanta ratio (moth pics/
phone)Hypena Scabra 0.5682 0.1682
Fissicrambus mutabilis 0.0580 0.1521Blastobasis glandulella 0.1599 0.1313
Dolichomia olinalis 0.8785 0.1152Udea rubigalis 0.2564 0.0829
Clepsis peritana 0.0897 0.0806Microcrambus elegans 1.0452 0.0760
Galgula partita 0.1734 0.0714Melanolophia signataria 1.2746 0.0714
Costaconvexa centrostrigaria 0.3920 0.0691Acleris semipurpurana 0.0695 0.0668
Glyphidocera juniperella 0.2179 0.0622Idia aemula 0.1883 0.0599
Archips argyrospila 0.0472 0.0507Eupithecia miserulata 0.9838 0.0507Parapediasia teterrella 0.0951 0.0484
Diatraea lisetta 0.1417 0.0461Phigalia denticulata 2.5297 0.0461
Pleuroprucha insulsaria 0.1761 0.0461Atteva aurea 0.2314 0.0438
Celypha cespitana 0.0013 0.0438Herpetogramma aeglealis 0.0108 0.0415
Platynota idaeusalis 0.1066 0.0415Marimatha nigrofimbria 0.5938 0.0392
Palthis asopialis 0.2024 0.0392Argyrotaenia velutinana 0.0533 0.0369
Tetanolita floridana 0.0472 0.0369Epimecis hortaria 0.4453 0.0346Scoparia basalis 0.2922 0.0346
Tetanolita mynesalis 0.0688 0.0346
Athens most common Athens ratio (moth pics/phone) Atlanta ratio (moth pics/phone)Phigalia denticulata 2.5223 0.0461Hypoprepia fucosa 1.8414 0.0000
Hypagyrtis unipunctata 1.5263 0.0092Melanolophia signataria 1.2746 0.0207
Cissusa spadix 1.1417 0.0023Microcrambus elegans 1.0452 0.0760Eupithecia miserulata 0.9838 0.0507
Phigalia strigataria 0.9791 0.0000Dolichomia olinalis 0.8785 0.1152
Sciota uvinella 0.8117 0.0000Ectropis crepuscularia 0.7807 0.0000
Phoberia atomaris 0.6991 0.0000Iridopsis defectaria 0.6862 0.0069Clemensia albata 0.6660 0.0000
Alsophila pometaria 0.6302 0.0276Marimatha nigrofimbria 0.5938 0.0392
Spilosoma congrua 0.5837 0.0000Lochmaeus bilineata 0.5735 0.0000
Hypena scabra 0.5682 0.1682Idia rotundalis 0.4912 0.0000
Acrolophus popeanella 0.4879 0.0230Eutrapela clemataria 0.4845 0.0138
Nadata gibbosa 0.4730 0.0023Epimecis hortaria 0.4453 0.0346
Glenoides texanaria 0.4150 0.0000Baileya ophthalmica 0.3947 0.0000
Costaconvexa centrostrigaria 0.3920 0.1152Nigetia formosalis 0.3806 0.0000Cisthene packardii 0.3752 0.0000Paleacrita vernata 0.3590 0.0000
Clarke County Atlanta
BlueHeron
Sandy Creek
Hypoprepia fucosaminiata
2,72919
26327
00
Clemensia albata 987 101 0
Cisthene packardiiplumbea
556407
113
00
Crambidia uniformis +pallida
865 15 0
Totals lichen moths
5,563 420 0
all moths 96,630 7,005 1,932
5.8% 6.0% 0.0%
Lichen moths
Conclusions• Atlanta has a lower abundance of moths and of species even
with equal effort. (phone pictures)• Comparing Athens to Atlanta, many species match each
other in top 30. However, the ratio of top 1 Moths and photos in Atlanta is even lower than the ratio of top 30 of Athens.
• Atlanta does not have any lichen moths, while 6% of Athens’ moths are lichen ones. Atlanta’s air pollution may reduce the lichen’s population.
• April, May, and June will be incredibly important months for the project!
Acknowledgments• Dr. John Pickering and Ms. Nancy Lowe (UGA)
- Ms. Victoria Staples and Mr. Cameron Prybol
• Dr. Jonathan Lochamy and Dr. Ilse Rickets (GPC)
• Additional Interns not present: Priscilla Adodo, Dienabou Diawara, Tshibambe Tshimbombu*, Ndasi Hepi*, Folashade Maxwell*, Yitbarek Kazentet*, Mwoddah Habib, Imien Adodo*, Hanna Nune*, Fatima Yadudu*, Quan Bui*, Khoa Nguyen*, Kristen Farley*, and Jabrel Hersi*.
• Funding provided by STEM II Minigrant
* Interns from prior year.