doe advice

3
Objective: Minimize the number of defects (smaller the better) Number of factors: 3 (Power, Heating Time, Feed Pressure) Number of levels: 3 (see matrix) Method: Taguchi Matrix L9 using Minitab Powe r Heating Time Feed Pressure Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 55 3 1.5 1 0 0 55 6 2 2 3 3 55 9 2.5 3 3 3 60 3 2 0 1 1 60 6 2.5 2 2 3 60 9 1.5 1 1 1 65 3 2.5 1 1 1 65 6 1.5 1 1 1 65 9 2 3 3 3 Analysis of Variance for S/N ratio Source D F Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Power 2 9.759 9.759 4.88 2.5 4 0.2 82 Heating Time 2 131.1 95 131.1 95 65.5 98 34. 18 0.0 28 Feed pressure 2 103.0 42 103.0 42 51.5 21 26. 84 0.0 36 Residual Error 2 3.839 3.839 1.91 9 Total 8 247.8 36 Response Table for S/N ratio Lev el Powe r Heating Time Feed Pressure

Upload: retrogrades

Post on 28-Sep-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Design of experiments

TRANSCRIPT

Objective: Minimize the number of defects (smaller the better)

Number of factors: 3 (Power, Heating Time, Feed Pressure)

Number of levels: 3 (see matrix)

Method: Taguchi Matrix L9 using Minitab

PowerHeating TimeFeed PressureRun 1Run 2Run 3

5531.5100

5562233

5592.5333

6032011

6062.5223

6091.5111

6532.5111

6561.5111

6592333

Analysis of Variance for S/N ratio

Source DFSeq SSAdj SSAdj MSFP

Power29.7599.7594.882.540.282

Heating Time2131.195131.19565.59834.180.028

Feed pressure2103.042103.04251.52126.840.036

Residual Error23.8393.8391.919

Total8247.836

Response Table for S/N ratioLevelPowerHeating Time Feed Pressure

1-4.4752.1771.59

2-1.924-5.395-5.478

3-3.181-6.362-5.692

Delta2.5518.5397.282

Rank312

Prediction

Selected the optimum settings from the Main effects plot and response table for S/N ratios

PowerHeating Time Feed Pressure

6031.5

Predicted values:

S/N ratioMean

8.23011-0.55556

Question:

The objective was to minimize the number of defects. I selected the optimum settings from my DOE and predicted the results. What does a mean of -0.55556 imply? Does that mean the number of defects will be less than zero? Please advice.