donna page hsd meeting 23 february 2010. history ahps web pages phase v implemented june 2007...
DESCRIPTION
Summary of Phase VI Features Migration from region-based web farms to NWS Consolidated Internet Farm (CIF) Use of new data pathways, including National River Location Database (NRLDB) Updated hydrograph image generation program (database driven) Transparent to users - with a few enhancements Precip Page modifications Pacific NW Service Assessment item (multiple data sources at a site) Product segmentation issue (associate proper product with location) Use of Google Maps for gauge site location map TARGET DATE – Mid-March Spring Flooding (Iowa, Red River, West) will begin in MarchTRANSCRIPT
Donna PageHSD Meeting
23 February 2010
HistoryAHPS Web Pages – Phase V implemented June 2007Hydrology Program decided to make investment in the
Consolidated Internet Farm (CIF) to accelerate the inclusion of the AHPS Web Pages into the CIF in Dec. 2006
Work began on Phase VI software in Q2 2007The hardware was delivered in March/April 2007
Summary of Phase VI FeaturesMigration from region-based web farms to NWS Consolidated
Internet Farm (CIF)Use of new data pathways, including National River Location
Database (NRLDB)Updated hydrograph image generation program (database driven)Transparent to users - with a few enhancements
Precip Page modifications Pacific NW Service Assessment item (multiple data sources at a site) Product segmentation issue (associate proper product with location) Use of Google Maps for gauge site location map
TARGET DATE – Mid-March Spring Flooding (Iowa, Red River, West) will begin in March
Key BenefitsRedundancy, load balancing – entire nation can be served by
one, two or three farmsMore frequent hydrograph updatesRealize enhancements for our customersWorks around existing SRH-HQ comms issueBegin addressing requirements backlog – “Phase VII” and
beyondCIF soon to be a Certified and Accredited systemLower contractor costs for support and future developmentImplementation of NetCache servers will decrease load on DB
and backend servers, improve download time for users
Key RisksNew data pathways and new software
Extensive testing requiredLess than preferred time (or dollars) available
Exposure to CIF outages – database, filers, network, etc.Gain CIF support
How will the performance change when the CIF is under heavy loads?
New, untested 3-tier support paradigm: TOC (Tier 1), CIF – OCWWS/HSD – AHPS Contractor (Tiers 2 and 3)
Potential for multiple versions of a hydrographOriginal plan – database synchronization – infeasible with MySQLSecondary plan – create all images from one farm and rsync – infeasible
due to bandwidth limitationsCurrent plan – create images at each farm and monitor
Intangibles / Other IssuesCIF Issues
Bandwidth is filling up Can we “reserve” future bandwidth to implement “secondary plan” of rsyncing images?
Will CIF be more stable than region farms? Will Phase VI overwhelm the CIF? Will bandwidth issues improve when we deploy Phase VI and stop rsyncing large HydroGen HML files?
Governance model under development/review No decision on who will pay for hardware refresh and CIF enhancements, CIF
O&M costs, etc.Less work (NRLDB) for HPM’s … or more questions? Training to mitigateDecision to Launch – based on Go-No Go ChecklistSpring Floods deadline - benefits vs. risksOther Phase VI preparations – PNS, Training, HydroGen Cron Coordination,
Lat-Lon and Flood Stage DiscrepanciesCurrent momentum between OHD and OCIOQuickly using up AHPS FY10 funds for support & development
Memorandum of AgreementDefines the responsibilities of each party in support of the
AHPS information dissemination. (OCIO, OCWWS, OOS, OHD)Support Structure defined
Tier 1 – TOCTier 2, 3 – CIF, WHFS Support, OHD Support ContractorTier 2 only - RegionTier 3 only – NCF
Tracking of issues through TOC ticket system, othersService Level Agreements for response and notification times.
Responses based on Emergency, High, Medium, Low impact designation.
Current StatusCIF
CR and HQ farms - generating full AHPS web pages on test siteSR – delay because of N-CIRT issue and risk to AHPS precip pages.
Will come on line shortly after deployment.To be done
Setup of ldm feeds of RFC probabilistic graphics and precipTraining for TOC and WHFS Support (Feb. 25-26)Training for WFOs (Regional reps: 3 sessions to be scheduled)Test of rehost of AHPS Web on 3rd party web (this week)Send out PNS for new URLs
Post deploymentChange WFO HydroGen crons
Go/No Go Checklist (part 1)
System is ReadyCIF is ready to operate AHPS. CIF Manager
AHPS development is complete. Orion
Testing shows data flow works and performance is within accepted performance thresholds.
AHPS Web Team
Support is ReadyTOC is ready to assume Phase VI support responsibilities. TOC Manager
CIF is ready to assume Phase VI support responsibilities. CIF CCB Manager
OCWWS / HSD is ready to assume Phase VI support responsibilities. OCWWS / HSD
Orion is ready to assume Phase VI support responsibilities. Orion
Go/No Go Checklist (part 2)
Region Data Calls are CompleteHydroGen crons are coordinated; flood stage and lat/lon discrepancies in the CMS are acceptably low.
Alaska Region
HydroGen crons are coordinated; flood stage and lat/lon discrepancies are acceptably low.
Central Region
HydroGen crons are coordinated; flood stage and lat/lon discrepancies are acceptably low.
Eastern Region
HydroGen crons are coordinated; flood stage and lat/lon discrepancies are acceptably low.
Southern Region
HydroGen crons are coordinated; flood stage and lat/lon discrepancies are acceptably low.
Western Region
The Timing is AcceptableIs not a CIF Critical Weather Day, and no other critical upgrades are planned
CIF CCB Manager
Current hydrologic situation is conducive to transition to Phase VI AHPS Web Team
Approval to Deploy Phase VIOCWWS supports and approves deployment of AHPS Phase VI. OCWWS
Director
OHD supports and approves deployment of AHPS Phase VI. OHD Director