dorrance h. hamilton building · josh kreutzberger dorrance h. hamilton building 22 motor control...
TRANSCRIPT
Dorrance H. Hamilton Building
Josh KreutzbergerLighting/ElectricalPenn State Architectural EngineeringSenior Thesis
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 2
Building OverviewThomas Jefferson University (TJU)
Philadelphia, PAMedical Education129,000 ft2 with an additional 60,000 ft2plaza area6 stories above grade with 2 story underground parking garageArchitect: Burt Hill
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 3
Presentation Outline
Lighting DepthClassroomAuditoriumLobby
Electrical DepthCentral Transformer vs. Distributed Transformers
Construction Management BreadthCost Analysis
Bus Duct vs. FeedersConstruction Management Breadth
Cost AnalysisMotor Control Center
Conclusions
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 4
Classroom (5th Floor)
Design ObjectivesReading/Writing TasksIlluminance target = 50fc Accent BlackboardDimmable Fixtures for use with VDT ScreenASHRAE 90.1 Standards
1.4 W/ft2
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 5
Classroom Lighting Plan
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 6
Classroom Isolines
Power Density = 1.31 W/ft2Average Illuminance on Workplane = 49.6 fc
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 7
Classroom Renderings
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 8
Auditorium
Design ObjectivesReading/Writing TasksIlluminance target = 50fc Accent BlackboardDimmable Fixtures for use with VDT ScreenUse Cove LuminairesASHRAE 90.1 Standards
1.4 W/ft2
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 9
Auditorium SectionCove Luminaires
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 10
Auditorium Lighting Plan
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 11
Auditorium Renderings
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 12
Auditorium Pseudo Color
Average Illuminance on the Work Plane is 42.3 fc.
Power Density is 1.47 W/ft2.
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 13
Lobby
Design ObjectivesCirculation - TaskIlluminance target = 5fc Aesthetically AppealingSparkleAccent ArchitectureHighlight Elevators & DoorwaysASHRAE 90.1 Standards
1.3 W/ft2
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 14
Lobby Lighting Plan
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 15
Lobby Isolines
Average Illuminance on the Work Plane is 22.1 fc.
Power Density is 1.05 W/ft2.
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 16
Lobby Renderings
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 17
Central vs. Distributed Transformers
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 18
Central vs. Distributed TransformersCost Analysis – Construction Management Breadth
Distributed Transformers are 10.0% cheaper and cost $24,120 less than the Central Transformer.
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 19
Busduct vs. Feeders
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 20
Busduct vs. FeedersCost Analysis – Construction Management Breadth
Busduct is 7.6% cheaper and costs $4,508 less than the individual feeders.
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 21
Motor Control Center
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 22
Motor Control Center - Sizing600 amp busduct is needed.
A 600-amp busduct will need 6X number of spaces.
Total of 93X number of spaces. Since there are 12X spaces per section, I will need 8 sections.
Final dimensions of the motor control center are 16”deep, 90” high, and 180”long.
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 23
Motor Control Center Layout
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 24
ConclusionLighting Depth
ClassroomTarget Illuminance = 50 fc, 49.6 fc averageAccent BlackboardDimmable Fixtures for use with VDT ScreenASHRAE 90.1 Standards
1.31 W/ft2 calculated, 1.4 W/ft2 allowed Auditorium
Target Illuminance = 50 fc, 42.3 fc averageAccent BlackboardDimmable Fixtures for use with VDT ScreenUse Cove LuminairesASHRAE 90.1 Standards
1.47 W/ft2 calculated, 1.4 W/ft2 allowed Lobby
Target Illuminance = 5 fc, 22.1 fc averageAesthetically Appealing/SparkleAccent ArchitectureHighlight Elevators and DoorwaysDimmable Fixtures for use with controlsASHRAE 90.1 Standards
1.05 W/ft2 calculated, 1.3 W/ft2 allowed
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 25
ConclusionElectrical Depth
Distributed Transformers vs. Central TransformerDistributed Transformers are 10.0% cheaper and cost $24,120 lessthan the Central Transformer.Recommendation: Go with the Distributed Transformers due to thecheaper system cost even when the sixth floor transformer is added.
Busduct vs. FeedersBusduct is 7.6% cheaper and costs $4,508 less than the individual feeders.Recommendation: Go with the Busduct due to the cost savings and square footage savings.
Motor Control CenterRecommendation: Go with the MCC due to the square footage savings and the organization provided with a MCC.
Josh Kreutzberger Dorrance H. Hamilton Building 26
Thanks!
Questions?
Comments?
Acknowledgments
Design Firms
The Lighting Practice
Burt Hill
AE Faculty
Dr. Mistrick
Prof. Dannerth
Prof. Parfitt
Prof. Holland
Family & Friends